Shenandoah Valley Westminster-Canterbury was inspected 9 times between December 8, 2020 and November 20, 2025 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 3 of those visits ended with violations cited and 6 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 15 violations under 14 distinct standards. 2 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 8 of these 9 are still on the state's site; the other 1 has since dropped off it and is reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
9Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
November 20, 2025Inspection
September 18, 2025Inspection
- The regional licensing office received a self-reported incident on 09/10/2025 indicating that on 09/9/2025 resident 1 did not return with the group to Blue Ridge Hall (memory support) following an activity off of the unit in Lawrence Hall. The self-report indicated that resident 1 was unaccounted for from 11:49 a.m. until 12:08 p.m.
- Staff 6 and 7 showed licensing inspector (LI) Lawrence Hall, where the activity was held, and the location of where resident 1 was found, which was outside of their former apartment on Winchester Hall in independent living, at 12:08 p.m. Resident 1 had walked down two hallways and took the elevator or the stairs to get from Lawrence Hall to Winchester Hall.
- Staff 4 confirmed that on 09/09/2025, resident 1 was found by security cameras outside of her former apartment, and staff 4 accompanied resident 1 back to memory support.
- During an interview, LI asked staff 4 if certain residents were assigned to certain staff members when off of the memory support hall. Staff 4 stated, “There is usually a group, and one staff member leads and one is behind, and the 2 to 3 staff, depending, help watch everyone.”
- '
- Resident 1 admitted 7/22/2025 did not have a resident agreement in the resident record.
- Upon request, the facility did not provide a resident agreement for admission to Blue Ridge Hall (memory support) for resident 1.
- During an interview with staff 6, when asked if there was a resident agreement for resident 1’s admission to memory support, staff 6 stated, “I would say no; we have an admission agreement for when they moved into independent living”.'
- During an interview with staff 4, when asked if there was a resident agreement for resident 1’s admission to memory support, staff 4 stated, “No, not an admission agreement with the information you described”.
- Resident 1’s record did not contain documentation of the elopement on 09/09/2025 or notification to the family of the elopement.
- During an interview with staff 6, when asked if there was documentation of resident 1’s elopement or speaking with the family following the incident, staff 6 stated, “No documentation and no wander assessment after incident”.
November 20, 2024Inspection
- Resident 2 had order for Occupational Therapy dated 9/4/2024 and the Individualized Service Plan (ISP) developed on 6/8/2024 did not include his need for these services.
- Resident 4 had a SV Morse Fall Scale assessment completed on 9/4/2023 that indicated a score of 85, which according to the assessment scale is a high risk for falls. The ISP developed on 5/6/2024 did not identify Resident 4 as a high risk for falls.
- Resident 4 had a physician’s order dated 9/6/2024 for minced and moist meats. Resident 4’s ISP developed on 5/6/2024 did not identify his need for the ordered diet.
- Resident 4 wears a wander management device and the ISP developed on 5/6/2024 did not identify his need to wear such device.
- Resident 6 had a SV Morse Fall Scale assessment completed on 9/25/2024 that indicated a score of 80, which according to the assessment scale which is a high risk for falls. The ISP developed on 3/25/2024 did not identify Resident 6 as a high risk for falls.
- During tour of the facility the LI observed a door to a room containing resident records was left unattended. LI asked Staff 4 if the door was normally left open and unattended and she said yes.
June 13, 2024Complaint survey
June 13, 2024Complaint survey
December 7, 2023Inspection
May 24, 2023Inspection
- There was no documentation indicating a semi-annual review of the emergency preparedness and response plan had been completed with staff, residents, and volunteers.
- The LI interviewed the administrator on 05/24/2023 who confirmed a review a had not been completed and was unable to confirm the date of the previous review.
- The records for residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 did not contain information regarding previous mental health or intellectual disability services history, if any, and if applicable for care or services.
- The records for residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8 did not contain information regarding current behavioral and social functioning, strengths, and problems.
- The records for residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8 did not contain information regarding substance abuse history if applicable for care or services.
- A review of the on-site health care oversite completed on 03-31-2023 did not include the date oversight was provided, signature of the licensed health care professional(s) and recommendations for change for the following: Monitor conformance to the facility’s medication management plan and the maintenance of required medication reference materials; Evaluate the ability of residents who self-administer medications to continue to safely do so; Observe infection control measures and consistency with the infection control program of the facility.
- During a walk-though of the third floor, the LI observed the mechanical room door propped open and unattended. A shelf in the room contained multiple containers of cleaning supplies and chemicals.
- The file for staff #19, hired on 06/14/2022, did not contain a criminal history record report.
- The LI interviewed the administrator who stated “the criminal history report could not be located for staff #19.”
- d by the completion of the current screening form published by the Virginia Department of Health of a form consistent with it. EVIDENCE:
- The risk assessment form for staff #3 hired on 06/15/2021 was incomplete.
- The risk assessment form for staff #4 hired on 06/16/2021 was incomplete.
- Resident 9 has the following order: Tramadol HCL Oral tablet 50mg: Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for severe pain.
- Documentation in the MAR indicates medication was administered on 05/16/2023 at 6:02am and was not effective. There is no documentation of follow-up.
- Documentation in the MAR indicates medication was administered on 05/20/2023 at 8:40am and was not effective. There is no documentation of follow-up.
- Documentation of fire drills indicate a fire drill was conducted on 02/28/2023 at 11:06pm; 03/29/2023 at 11:35pm and 04/27/2023 at 9:45pm.
- Documentation of a day shift fire drill is 12/30/2022 at 1:54pm.
- The Uniform Assessment Instrument (UAI) for resident #2, dated 12/11/2022 indicates resident requires physical assistance with dressing. This is not indicated on the ISP dated 12/11/2022.
- The Uniform Assessment Instrument for resident #6 dated 05/04/2023 indicates mechanical assistance is needed with walking. The type of mechanical support is not identified on the ISP dated 05/04/2023.