Hunters Woods at Trails Edge was inspected 22 times between February 11, 2021 and May 27, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 15 of those visits ended with violations cited and 7 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 39 violations under 31 distinct standards. 6 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 2 of these 22 are still on the state's site; the other 20 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
22Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
May 27, 2026Inspection
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 1 confirmed that the medication plan submitted and approved in March of 2026 was still the most up to date copy being used in the facility.
- Page 319 of the Medication Management Plan states that all orders will be transcribed to the EMAR within 24 hours of receipt.
- Resident 1’s record contains an order for Lactin Lotion, dated 05/02/2026, that states to apply topically to affected skin of feet and lower legs
- Resident 1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May of 2026 indicates that despite the start date of 05/02/2026, the Lactin Lotion was not started on the MAR until 05/22/2026. It was marked as administered on 05/22/2026, but not administered and pending delivery on 05/23/2026 and 05/24/2026.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 1 confirmed that the facility’s medication management plan was not followed.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 2 confirmed that Resident 3 receives direct care or companion services provided by private duty personnel.
- Resident 3’s ISP, dated 11/11/2025, did not include documentation of the direct care or companion services provided by private duty personnel.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 1 and Staff 2 confirmed that the direct care or companion services provided by private duty personnel were not listed on Resident 3’s ISP.
- During a criminal history record report and sworn statement of affirmation review, Staff 12’s record was reviewed. Staff 12 was hired on 05/06/2026. Staff 12’s Criminal Record Report, dated 05/01/2026, contained two barrier crime convictions dated 06/26/1992, 01/19/1993, and 11/13/2002.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 1 confirmed that Staff 12 remained employed despite conviction of multiple barrier crimes.
- During a medication pass observation between Resident 1 and Staff 7, the LI observed that Resident 1’s room did not have a bed.
- Resident 1’s record did not include written approval for Resident 1’s room not to have a bed.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 1 confirmed that written specification to not have a bed, as listed in subsection B, was maintained in Resident 1’s record.
- Resident 1’s record contains an order for Lactin Lotion, dated 05/02/2026, that states to apply topically to affected skin of feet and lower legs.
- Resident 1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May of 2026 indicates that despite the start date of 05/02/2026, the medication was not started on the MAR until 05/22/2026. It was marked as administered on 05/22/2026, but not administered and pending delivery on 05/23/2026 and 05/24/2026.
- Resident 6’s record contains an order for Cod Oil, dated 04/13/2026, that states take one capsule by mouth every day.
- Resident 6’s MAR for May of 2026 indicates that the Cod Oil was not administered on 05/11/2026 because it was discontinued; however, medication administration resumed on 05/12/2026. Resident 6’s record did not include a discontinuation order for Cod Oil.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 2 stated that the RX number changed by the pharmacy, so the barcode of the medication was pulling an error code, as if the medication was discontinued – despite not being discontinued.
- In an interview with LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 1 and Staff 2 confirmed that the medication for Resident 1 and Resident 6 were not administered per physician instructions.
- Resident 1’s records include documentation of a fall that occurred on 05/22/2026. Resident 1’s record does not contain a fall risk rating.
- Resident 2’s, admitted 11/01/2024, record contains a fall risk rating completed 11/18/2024. Resident 2’s record did not contain completion of an annual fall risk rating.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 2 stated that Resident 1’s fall risk rating for Resident 1’s fall on 05/22/2026 was in progress but not completed. Staff 2 confirmed that Resident 2’s fall risk rating was not completed annually.
- Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on 01/31/2024.
- Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on 06/10/2024.
- Both Resident 6 and Resident 7 reside in the safe, secure unit. In an interview with the LI on 05/27/2026, Staff 2 stated that both Resident 6 and Resident 7 require rounding due to an inability to use the signaling device.
- Resident 6’s ISP, dated 05/12/2026, and Resident 7’s ISP, dated 01/21/2026, do not include the resident’s inability to use the call bell device.
- In an interview with the LI on05/27/2026, Staff 1 and Staff 2 confirmed that the ISP’s of Resident 6 and Resident 7 do not include the inability to use the signaling device.
March 5, 2026Inspection
August 19, 2025Inspection
- On 08/02/2025, the LI received a written incident report for an elopement from the secure unit at the facility. 2.The facility’s written incident report and the egress door’s alarm records show that Staff 3 cleared the door alarm at 3:47 a.m. after hearing it; however, Staff 3 did not check for or notice that Resident 1 (admitted 07/15/2024) had exited through the same door leading outside of the safe, secure environment.
- During routine safety rounds at 4:45 a.m., Staff 5 observed that Resident 1 was not in their room. A search was initiated within the entire facility and Resident 1 was not located.
- The police located Resident 1 at 6:20 a.m. and returned them to the facility.
- Staff 1 confirmed the details in the incident report regarding the elopement and acknowledged that Resident 1’s health, safety, and well-being were potentially compromised by being outside the secure environment.
- On 08/02/2025, the facility submitted a written incident report stating that Resident 1 had eloped around 3:50 a.m. and was found outside the Safe, Secure Unit off premises on 08/02/2025 around 6:20 a.m.
- Communication log completed by staff 5 on 08/02/2025 states that Resident 1 was not seen in their room during the round checks at 4:45 a.m.
- According to data from the nearest weather station at Washington Dulles International Airport (KIAD), the weather in Reston, VA, at 4:52 a.m. on Saturday, August 2, 2025, was clear with a temperature of 61°F.
- Based on Google Maps, the distance from the facility to the Safeway where Resident 1 was found is approximately a 6-minute walk. The route passes through a primarily residential area and involves crossing one road, Colts Neck Road, which has a crosswalk and is located in front of the shopping center adjacent to the residential neighborhood.
- In an interview conducted with the Licensing Inspector (LI) on 08/19/2025, Staff 1 confirmed that resident 1 eloped off premises during the early morning of 08/02/2025 potentially through a fire door equipped with delayed egress. Staff 1 also indicated that the police located the resident at approximately 6:20 a.m. at the Safeway grocery store located .03 miles from the facility and returned the resident to the facility around 6:36 a.m.
July 29, 2025Complaint survey
- On 07/29/2025, the LI observed resident 1’s apartment, specifically noting the condition of the carpet surrounding the lti l sofa area. The carpet had multiple stained and worn spots by the sofa area.
- Staff 2 acknowledged the appearance and condition of the carpet.
- Photo evidence taken.
March 26, 2025Complaint survey
- The facility’s call bell documents were reviewed during the inspection. From 03/04/2025 to 03/23/2025, there were 7 call bell response times for resident 1 that exceeded 20 minutes. ith th LI 05/22/2025 St ff 1 t t d ?Th f ilit d
- In an email exchange with the LI on 05/22/2025, Staff 1 stated. ?The facility does not have a set policy specifying an exact time frame for responding to call bells, our internal practice emphasizes timely and efficient responses as a standard of quality care.?
February 26, 2025Inspection
- Staff 1 acknowledged resident 1’s most current ISP was completed on 07/08/2024 during the onsite inspection on 02/26/2025.
- Upon review of resident 1’s record, it contained fall risk assessments completed after resident 1 fell 02/05/2025.
- Resident 1’s ISP dated 07/08/2024 was not updated after fall risk assessments completed on 02/05/2025 and on 02/09/2025, to indicate any intervention put into place.
February 5, 2025Complaint survey
October 16, 2024Inspection
- Facility policy dated 4/17/2023, stated, “Telephone orders will not be accepted for new medications”, ?Telephone orders may be accepted for changes to existing medications and must be properly documented.?
- On 9/27/2024, staff 2 took a telephone order for a new medication, Lisinopril, for Resident 1
- Staff 1 confirmed that taking a verbal telephone order for a new medication was not following the facility’s written policy.
- Resident 1’s record had a telephone order form dated 9/27/2024 to, ?* DC amlodipine and HCTZ once lisinopril is available to administer, *DC Lasix.? The new medication was (Lisinopril). The form was signed by staff 2. On 9/27/2024, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for resident 1 indicated Lisinopril 10 mg was administered at 8:00 a.m. and amlodipine 10 mg, Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 20 mg and Furosemide 20 mg were administered at 9:00 a.m.
- Staff 1 confirmed there was a medication error by not discontinuing the amlodipine and HCTZ before starting the Lisinopril.
October 16, 2024Inspection
- Resident 1 (admitted on 8/5/2024) had an orientation form in the record; however, it was not signed or dated by the resident.
- Staff 1 confirmed that the orientation form was not signed by resident 1.
- Resident 1’s record had an ISP dated 8/5/2024 that was not signed or dated by resident 1 or their legal representative.
- Staff 1 confirmed in an interview that the ISP was not signed by resident 1 or the legal representative.
- The resident’s rights and responsibilities for staff 2 (hired 4/2/2024) was not signed or dated to indicate the completion of training.
- In an interview, staff 1 confirmed the resident’s rights and responsibilities training acknowledgement was not signed and dated.
April 25, 2024Inspection
- At approximately 8:17AM during the walk through of the facility’s memory care unit, there was an operable long-stem lighter with an orange base located in the unlocked top far right drawer of the cabinet on the same wall as the refrigerator in the country kitchen which is accessible to residents. This was also observed by staff person 4.
- The ISP for resident 2, dated 02/29/2024, indicates that the resident is receiving hospice/palliative care and that the resident is receiving end of life comfort care services through collateral 2; however, the ISP does not include information of what services are being provided by Collateral 2 to the resident.
- Staff persons 4 and 5 verified that the resident is receiving hospice services from Collateral 2.
- The uniform assessment instrument (UAI) dated 02/13/2024 in the record for resident 1 has documentation that the resident has a supra-pubic catheter. The ISP dated 02/13/2024 does not have a written description of services to be provided for this identified need. The ISP also does not have any time frames listed for expected outcomes for any of resident 1’s identified needs.
- The record for resident 5 has a signed Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNR) dated 04/16/2024. The ISP dated 04/20/2024 in the record for resident 5 does not include resident 5’s DNR status and has documentation of “CPR” located under the photo for resident 5 on the first page. The ISP also does not have any time frames listed for expected outcomes for any of resident 5’s identified needs.
- The ISP for resident 2, updated 02/29/2024, and the ISP for resident 3, updated 04/05/2024, do not have any time frames listed for expected outcomes for any of resident 2 or 3’s identified needs.
- The record for resident 1 has physician orders signed on 10/02/2023 that include that resident 1 has been ordered a diabetic diet. The special diet book located in the facility kitchen has documentation that resident 1 is on a regular diet. Interviews by two licensing inspectors (LIs) and staff persons 8 and 9 conducted on 04/25/2024 expressed that they were not aware of the physician order for a diabetic diet for resident 1 and have been providing a regular diet to the resident.
- The record for resident 2 has physician orders signed on 03/27/2024 that indicate for the resident’s current diet to be discontinued and to start the resident on a pureed diet with thin liquids. The special diet book located in the facility kitchen has documentation that resident 2 is on a low sodium diet with thin liquids. In addition, observation of the noon-time meal during the on-site inspection, the two LIs along with staff persons 8 and 9 observed that the resident was being served lunch entree 2 which was a chicken salad sandwich on white bread with lettuce, tomato, and onion with house made potato chips. Staff persons 8 and 9 expressed that they were not aware of the physician order for the resident to be served a pureed diet and have been providing a regular diet to the resident.
- The facility medication management plan has documentation under Med 14- Outdated, Damaged or Contaminated Medications that “2. All RMAs are to confirm expirations dates of medications during the medication pass” and under Med 22-Administering and Assisting with Injections that ?10. Note the expiration dates for injectables and discard upon expiration “and ”11. Once an injectable medication is opened follow the expiration date according to manufacturer’s instructions?.
- An opened Lantus Insulin pen was observed by two licensing inspectors (LIs) in the presence of staff person 5 in the memory care medication cart for resident 3. The pen did not have a date that the Insulin was opened or a date to discard the insulin to be able to follow manufacturer’s instructions which is to discard a Lantus Insulin pen 28 days following the first use.
- The record for resident 3 contains a signed physician’s order, dated 04/15/2024, for potassium chloride 20MG tablet take one tablet by mouth every day for two days for a total of two doses.
- The April 2024 MAR for resident 3 includes documentation that the mediation was only administered on 04/18/2024 at 8:00AM.
- Interview with staff person 5 revealed that the medication was administered to the resident per the physician’s order for a total of two doses; however, staff person 5 was unable to find MAR documentation of the second dose of the aforementioned medication that was administered to resident 3.
- The records for staff person 10, date of hire 09/19/2023, and staff person 11, date of hire 08/08/2023, did not contain documentation of a criminal history record report being completed on or prior to their 30th day of employment. In an interview conducted with staff person 7 on the day of inspection, staff person 7 expressed that this was correct and that criminal history reports could not be found for these employees.
- The record for staff person 12, date of hire 09/19/2023, has documentation of a criminal history record report being processed on 10/25/2023 but the report has documentation that the transaction is being processed. The record for staff person 12 does not have a completed criminal history record report. In an interview conducted with staff person 7 on the day of inspection, staff person 7 expressed that this was correct and that a completed criminal history report could not be found for this employee.
- The record for staff person 13, date of hire 09/05/2023, has documentation that a criminal history record report was not completed until 11/02/2023 for this employee.
- The record for staff person 14, date of hire 09/19/2023, has documentation that a criminal history record report was not completed until 10/30/2023 for this employee.