Viva Memory Care at Chesapeake was inspected 32 times between September 17, 2020 and February 18, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 23 of those visits ended with violations cited and 9 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 59 violations under 39 distinct standards. 15 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 1 of these 32 is still on the state's site; the other 31 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
32Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
February 18, 2026Inspection
- During the Licensing Inspector (LI) observation of the facility’s call alert system on 02/18/2026 with staff #1, the pull cords located in the bathrooms and resident rooms that are to be used for residents to alert staff when assistance is needed were not working.
- During an interview on 02/18/26 with staff #1, staff #2, and staff #3, staff #1, staff #2, and staff #3 confirmed the facility did not have an operable and working signaling device that is accessible to the residents that alerts staff when the resident needs assistance.
October 30, 2025Complaint survey
October 30, 2025Complaint survey
October 30, 2025Inspection
September 11, 2025Complaint survey
- The record for resident #1 contains the following: ? A physician order signed and dated 03/18/25 for Eliquis 2.5 mg, one tablet by mouth twice a day for a start date of 03/09/25. ? Resident’s March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) includes instructions to take Eliquis 2.5mg one tablet by mouth twice a day with a start date of 03/09/25 and a discharge date of 03/25/25.
- The record for resident #1 did not contain a valid order from a physician or other prescriber to discontinue Eliquis 2.5mg one tablet twice a day.
- Upon request, and during an interview on 09/11/25 with staff #2, staff #2 was not able to provide a valid order to discontinue Eliquis 2.5mg for resident #1. Staff #2 confirmed a valid order to discontinue Eliquis 2.5mg was not in the resident’s record.
- The record for resident #1 contains a physician order and physician note dated 07/25/25 to increase Seroquel to 75mg at night and maintain 50mg in the morning for agitation/anxiety/aggression related to dementia.
- Resident #1’s July and August 2025 Medication Administrator Records (MARs) did not include instructions to take Seroquel 75 mg every night at bedtime starting 07/25/25. The instructions on the July and August 2025 MARs is to take Seroquel 50mg one tablet by mouth twice a day.
- During an interview on 09/11/25 with staff #2, staff #2 confirmed resident #1’s July and August 2025 MARs did not include instructions per the physician order dated 07/25/25 for the resident to start taking Seroquel 75mg at bedtime starting 07/25/25.
August 27, 2025Inspection
- The facility’s medication management plan dated 09/01/24, documents that medications always need to be administered according to the “7 rights” (right person, right medication, right time, right route, right reason, and right record). 2.Staff #5 sent an incident report via email to the Licensing Inspector (LI) on 8/26/25 that included the following for a medication error that occurred on 08/20/25: Resident #1 was administered resident #2’s medications at 9am.
- During an interview on 08/27/25 with staff #1, staff #1 stated on 08/20/25 at 9am, staff #1 administered the following medications to resident #1 in error as these medications are prescribed to resident #2: ? Amlodipine 1mg for hypertension ? Aspirin 81 mg for blood thinner ? Calcium 600mg for supplement ? Ezetimbe 10mg for hyperlipidemia ? Pepcid/Famotidine 20 mg for Gerd ? Januvia 100mg for Diabetes ? Metformin 500mg for Diabetes ? Multivitamin for Supplement ? Omega Fish Oil for Dyslipidemia ? Ramipril 10mg for Hypertension
- Resident #1’s hospital visit summary dated 8/20/25 documents the reason for visit as drug overdose and the diagnoses as hypotension, hyperglycemia, medication administered in error, and accidental overdose. Lab tests were completed and the resident was treated with sodium chloride. Staff #1 stated resident returned to the facility on 08/20/25 with no new orders from the hospital.
- Staff #5 sent an incident report via email to the Licensing Inspector (LI) on 8/23/25 that included the following for a medication error that occurred on 08/22/25: ? Resident #3 was given resident #4’s medication.
- An email sent to the LI on 8/26/25 states that on 08/22/25, resident #3 was administered the following medications prescribed to resident #4: ? Atorvastation 40 mg for hyperlipidemia ? Lantus 38 units for diabetes ? Ativan/Lorazepam for dementia 0.5mg ? Metformin 500mg for diabetes
- Resident #3’s hospital documentation (pages 30-35) dated 08/22/25 through 08/24/2025 states the resident was admitted 08/22/25 through 08/24/25 for receiving another resident’s medication, insulin overdose, accidental or unintentional. The resident received IV dextrose for treatment and the resident’s blood sugar levels were monitored during the hospital stay.
August 27, 2025Complaint survey
- The record for Staff #1, (hire date of 07/16/25 and suspended on 09/25/25), contains a personal care aide (PCA) training certificate with a date of December 2024. During a phone interview on 09/24/25 with collateral contact #1, collateral contact #1 stated staff #1 did not enroll in and/or complete the personal care aide training program provided by collateral contact #1’s home health care agency. Collateral contact #1 stated the instructor listed on the PCA certificate does not provide instructor training for collateral contact #1’s PCA training program.
- Upon request on 09/24/25 for evidence of staff #1’s qualifications as a direct care staff, staff #3 sent the Licensing Inspector (LI) an email on 09/25/25 containing an email from collateral contact #1’s agency stating staff #1 has not completed the personal care aide training program with the agency.
- During a phone interview on 09/25/25, with staff #3, staff #3 stated staff #1 was suspended from the facility on 09/25/25 due to not providing evidence of qualifications as a direct care staff.
- Upon request and during an interview on 08/27/25 with staff #3, staff #3 provided a health care oversight completed on 12/27/24. Staff #3 was not able to provide a healthcare oversight completed within six months after 12/27/24.
August 27, 2025Complaint survey
August 27, 2025Complaint survey
- Resident #2’s UAI in the record is dated as completed on 03/20/24. The resident’s record did not contain an annual UAI completed after 03/20/24.
- Upon request and during an interview on 09/11/25 with staff #2, staff #2 was not able to provide an annual UAI completed after 3/20/24 for resident #2.
- Resident #4’s UAI in the record is dated as completed on 04/26/24. The resident’s record did not contain an annual UAI completed after 04/26/24.
- Upon request and during an interview on 09/11/25 with staff #2, staff #2 was not able to provide an annual UAI completed after 04/26/24 for resident #4.
- Resident #2’s ISP in the record is dated as completed on 03/20/24. The resident’s record did not contain an ISP reviewed and updated at least 12 months after 03/20/24.
- Upon request and during an interview on 09/11/25 with staff #2, staff #2 was not able to provide an ISP completed after 3/20/24 for resident #2.
- Resident #4’s ISP in the record is dated as completed on 04/26/24. The resident’s record did not contain an ISP reviewed and updated at least 12 months after 04/26/24.
- Upon request and during an interview on 09/11/25 with staff #2, staff #2 was not able to provide an ISP
- The record for staff #8, hire date of 04/01/25, does not contain a criminal history report.
- Upon request and during an interview on 09/11/25 with staff #3, staff #3 was not able to provide a criminal history report for staff #8.