Sancerre Atlee Station was inspected 20 times between July 31, 2023 and April 6, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 7 of those visits ended with violations cited and 13 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 13 violations under 9 distinct standards. 13 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 2 of these 20 are still on the state's site; the other 18 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
20Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
April 6, 2026Complaint survey
October 14, 2025Inspection
July 21, 2025Complaint survey
July 21, 2025Complaint survey
- An allegation was received that resident # 1 had a fall on 6/30/25 and remained on the floor in his room for over five hours. Date and time stamped video photographs were received showing resident on the floor from 11:55 pm on 6/30/25 to 5:21 am on 7/1/25. The video photographs do not show staff checking on the resident during the time period, staff does not appear in the video photographs until 5:21 am.
July 14, 2025Complaint survey
- An allegation and video was received by VDSS on 7/10/25 of staff 4 and 5 engaging in inappropriate sexual conduct and sleeping in the room of resident 1 from approximately 1:15 am to 5:45 am on the 11 pm to 7 am shift on 7/9/25 while resident 1 was present and sleeping in the room.
- Staff 1 stated on 7/14/25 that there were 21 residents in care on the memory care unit.
- The staffing schedule for the 11 pm to 7am shift on 7/9/25 document three staff assigned to the memory care unit - staff 4, staff 5, and staff 6.
- Staff 1 and 2 confirmed the validity of the allegation and video in an incident report submitted to VDSS on 7/10/25.
- Staff 4 and 5 were observed on surveillance video engaging in inappropriate sexual conduct in the room of resident 1 while resident 1 was present and sleeping.
- Resident 1 resides in a secure memory care environment due to a serious cognitive impairment and is unable to recognize danger or protect her own safety and welfare.
- Staff 4 and 5 disregarded the rights and dignity of resident 1 by engaging in inappropriate sexual activity and sleeping in full view of resident 1 who was present and sleeping.
- Staff 1 and 2 confirmed the validity of the allegation and video in an incident report submitted to VDSS on 7/10/25.
- Two direct care staff, staff 4 and 5, were videotaped engaged in inappropriate sexual conduct and sleeping in the room of resident 1 in the memory care unit for more than four hours.
- Staff 4 was also the medication aide assigned to administer medications on the memory care unit. 3.The physical and mental well-being of the residents in the secure memory care environment was not protected as staff 6, the staff member in charge on the 11 pm to 7 am shift on 7/9/2025, confirmed during a telephone interview on 7/21/25 that: (a) She was not aware that the two staff were asleep and that the 13 residents assigned to the two staff (according to the assignment sheet) were unsupervised from 1:15 am on 7/9/25 until 5:45am on 7/10/25. (b) She did not have a key to access residents? rooms in the event of a health or safety emergency. (c) She was unaware of the whereabouts of staff 4 and staff # 5 from 1:15am on 7/9/25 until 5:45pm on 7/10/25.
- Staff 6 during an interview on 7/21/25 could not confirm if care was provided to the 13 residents that staff 4 and staff 5 were responsible for from 1:15am on 7/9/25 until 5:45am on 7/10/25.
- Staff 4 and 5 were observed on a surveillance video entering the room of resident 1 at 1:15am on 7/9/25 and not leaving the room until 5:45am on 7/10/25.
- Staff 4 and 5 were responsible for a total of 13 residents in the safe, secure environment.
- There was no documentation of rounds being completed on 7/9/25 for the shift from 11:00pm to 7:00am.
- When asked for documentation of the rounds completed on 7/9/25 and 7/10/25. staff 1 and 2 were unable to provide documentation to support that rounds had been completed on the 11 pm to 7 am shift that started on 7/9/25 and ended on 7/10/25.
July 14, 2025Complaint survey
July 7, 2025Inspection
- The individualized service plan for resident # 1 dated 3/2/25 document that resident # 1 is a two person assist with bathing, toileting and transfers. On 5-15-25 the facility self-reported an incident in which the resident received bruising and a cut on the foot as a result of a one person assist with toileting.
July 7, 2025Complaint survey
July 7, 2025Complaint survey
- Photos were received along with a report that resident # 1 was found with bruising on the face and a raised area on the forehead on 5/11/25. The facility was unable to provide documentation of submission of a written report to the regional licensing office when asked by licensing staff.
- The individualized service plan for resident # 1 dated 2/25/25 (updated 7/18/25) document ed that resident # 1 is a two person assist with toileting and all transfers. Staff # 1 was observed by licensing staff attempting a one person assist with the resident during a sit-to-stand transfer on 7/7/25. An electronic communication log note dated 6/20/25 record one staff assisting resident # 1 during the provision of incontinence care.
- Two photographs of resident # 1 were forwarded to the licensing inspector showing bruising to the face and a discolored raised area on the forehead. A review of facility documentation found that facility staff was unaware of the origin of the injuries. There was no documentation provided of any monitoring or follow-up regarding the unknown injuries.