Harpers Station Yorktown was inspected 5 times between August 22, 2024 and February 12, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 5 of those visits ended with violations cited and 0 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 19 violations under 18 distinct standards.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
Every inspection listed here is currently published on the VDSS site.
Provider Information
Inspection History
5Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
February 12, 2026Inspection
- The facility’s MAR/MOR- Change of Shift Accuracy Check policy states, “The MAR/MOR Sign off Sheet will be initialed by outgoing and incoming Nurse/Medication Assistant Tech at the change of every shift after MAR/MOR has been perused for accuracy.”
- A review of the Change of Shift-Controlled Medication Count Sheet for the month of February 2026 documented staff failed to ensure counts of all controlled substances occurred 4 times between outgoing and incoming Nurse/Medication Assistant Tech for controlled medications.
- Staff #4 acknowledged the Change of Shift-Controlled Medication Count Sheet was not completed for each change of shift.
- During the on-site inspection on 2/12/2026, the Licensing Inspector observed the following 8:00 am medications being administered more than an hour outside the standard dosing schedule. The following 9:00 am medications were administered by Staff #6: Resident #5 at 10:57 am: amlodipine 5 mg, Lisinopril 20 mg, Meloxicam 15mg, memantine Hcl 5mg Resident #6 at 11:09 am: amiodarone 200mg, aspirin 81mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, duloxetine 30 mg Resident #7 11:17 am: amlodipine 10 mg, prednisolone acetate 1%, Triamcinolon cre 0.1%
- Staff # 6 acknowledged the medication was being administered outside of the standard dosing schedule.
- During the on-site inspection of the facility on 2/12/2026, the most current health inspection provided by the facility was dated 7/8/2024.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the 7/8/2024 inspection was the facility’s most recent inspection by the health department.
February 3, 2025Inspection
- On 2-3-25, the menu on the safe, secure unit posted near the nurse’s station and activity room did not include snacks.
- The menu on the assisted living unit near the elevator across from the dining room did not include snacks.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the snacks for the current week was not dated and posted for the residents.
- On 2-3-25, resident #1’s record included a valid written order for DNR dated 12-4-24. The resident’s personal and social data form also noted the resident’s DNR. The resident’s individualized service plan (ISP) dated 12-3-24 noted the resident was a “Full Code…staff would perform CPR in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest”.
- Staff #2 acknowledged the resident’s record did include a valid written order for DNR and the ISP noted resident to receive CPR in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest.
- On 2-3-25, resident #4 acknowledged having all meals in room and not eating in the facility’s dining room. The resident’s record did not have documentation of this written agreement to this effect, signed and dated by both the resident and the licensee or administrator and filed in the resident’s record.
- Staff #2 and #5 both when asked, acknowledged the resident eats all meals in room and does not dine in the facility’s dining room.
- Staff #2 acknowledged the facility did not have a specific written agreement to eat meals in the room that was signed and dated by the licensee or administrator.
January 16, 2025Inspection
- On 12-25-24, per the facility’s revised self-report, interviews with the facility administrator, and facility video recording at 7:37 p.m., resident #1, who reside in the facility safe, secure unit, was observed to be agitated, trying to exit the facility door near resident’s room on two occasions. Resident observed on video trying to use the facility keypad to exit the facility and pushing on the door.
- Per the facility’s video, resident then enters another room (1009) on the safe, secure unit. The facility video at 8:01 p.m. shows resident #1 walking on the sidewalk/parking lot side of the Assisted Living (ALF) section of the facility. Resident enters the front entrance of the ALF through the automatic sliding door and goes toward the safe, secure unit area of the building. Resident exits the building again with staff following resident out the front entrance to the ALF building.
- The facility contacts the local police for assistance. Resident runs into wooded area between the facility and a church. Staff continues to follow resident. Police report noted resident back in facility (20:24:39). Upon return to room, the resident was evaluated by staff #2, observed an abrasion on bridge of nose and skin tear on left hand above thumb, first aid provided.
September 21, 2024Inspection
- On 10-21-24, resident #2’s record did not have documentation of having received orientation to the facility. The resident’s date of admit noted as 10-1-24.
- Resident #3’s record did not have documentation of having received orientation to the facility. The resident’s date of admit noted as 9-28-24.
- Staff #1 and #2 acknowledged residents #2 and #3’s record did not have documentation of acknowledgement of receiving orientation to the facility.
- On 10-21-24, resident record review with staff #2, resident #1’s uniform assessment instrument (UAI) dated 10-3-24 noted transferring need assessed as mechanical help/physical assistance. The individualized service plan (ISP) dated 10-15-24 noted mechanical help/supervision. “resident will need assistance of grab bars and wheelchair…staff will provide supervision with bathing. Staff will report any changes in their physical needs to the person in charge”. Resident’s eating need assessed as independent. The ISP noted, “staff will provide reminders of all meals and supervision during mealtimes”. Wheeling need assessed as mechanical help. The ISP noted wheeling as mechanical and supervision. “resident needs supervision with transferring into wheelchair. Staff will monitor to ensure resident is propelling wheelchair safely, locked brakes and getting assistance with transferring”.
- Resident #2’s UAI dated 9-6-24 noted stairclimbing need assessed as mechanical help/supervision. The ISP dated 10-1-24 (10-6-24) noted stairclimbing as mechanical help/physical assistance. “Resident will need handrails and physical assistance to perform stairclimbing safely”. Staff #2 made written change to ISP prior to the inspector taking a photograph of the ISP document.
- Resident #3’s UAI dated 9-10-24 noted bathing need assessed as mechanical help/physical assistance. The ISP dated 10-10-24 noted “bathing needs help, yes Mechanical & Human Help Supervision. Resident requires the use of shower chair and grab bars for bathing. Care staff will set up showers, and provide supervision for bathing while encouraging to participate to the highest level of independence”.
- Staff #2 acknowledged the residents’ assessed needs and care plan were not in agreement.
- On 10-21-24, the facility assisted living activities calendar posted on the bulletin board located near the mailboxes was observed to be in less than 12-point type.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the posted schedule’s font was not at least 12-point type.
- On 10-21-24, during a tour of the kitchen with staff #1, staff #6 was not able to provide the inspector a copy of the diet manual.
- Staff #1 and #6 acknowledged the facility did not have a copy of the diet manual as required.
- On 10-21-24 during the medication pass observation with staff #3, resident #2’s blood glucose instrument (glucometer) was not labeled as required.
- Staff #1 and #3 acknowledged the resident’s blood glucose instrument (glucometer) was not labeled.
- On 10-21-24 during the medication pass observation with staff #3, resident #1’s October medication administration record (MAR) noted resident prescribed Miconazole Nitrate as needed, PRN. A check of the medication cart was conducted, and this specific PRN medication was not available in the facility.
- Staff #2 and #3 acknowledged the resident’s PRN Miconazole Nitrate was not available in the facility.
- On 10-21-24, the management, maintenance, dietary, activity schedule neither the clinical schedule indicated whoever is in charge at any given time. The management, maintenance, dietary, and activity schedules did not include the names of the staff person. The activity calendar provided did not include the job classification of the staff noted.
- Staff #1 and #2 acknowledged the written schedules provided did not include all of the required information.
- On 10-21-24, the facility’s menu for meals and snacks for the current week was not posted in the facility.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the posted menu and snack for the current week was not posted in the facility on the morning of 10-21-24.
August 22, 2024Inspection
- On 8-22-24 during a tour of the facility with staff #1 and #2, the fire and emergency evacuation postings show the primary and secondary escape routes, telephones, fire alarm boxes, and fire extinguishers.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the fire and emergency evacuation postings in the facility did not include all requirements.
- On 8-22-23 during a tour of the facility with staff #1 and #2, the wall to the right of the entrance was observed to have a hole. The wall in the bathroom of room # 1016 was observed to have a hole above the bathroom lights.
- The fenced grass area outside of the safe, secure unit was observed to have a low drain resembling a hole in the ground. Also observed was a board that stood approximately 2 feet tall with nails in it ground near the drain.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the buildings and grounds items were in need of repair.
- On 8-22-24, during a tour of the facility with staff #1 and #2, the sampled rooms observed did not have toilet tissue and soap accessible in the bathrooms.
- Staff #1 stated facility did not supply these items.
- On 8-22-24 during a tour of the facility with staff #2, the water temperature in the memory care rooms were 122.4 degrees in room #1010 and 124.9 degrees in room #1009.
- Staff #2 acknowledged the water temperature in the rooms were not within the required range 105 to 120 degrees F.