The Barclay at Tuckahoe was inspected 15 times between April 25, 2024 and May 14, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 7 of those visits ended with violations cited and 8 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 19 violations under 18 distinct standards. 7 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
Every inspection listed here is currently published on the VDSS site.
Provider Information
Inspection History
15Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
May 14, 2026Inspection
November 26, 2025Inspection
- Licensing inspector reviewed the internal facility incident report which documented that Staff 1 hit the hand and was physically rough with Resident 1.
- Licensing inspector reviewed the witness statements regarding the incident which stated Staff 1 hit the hand of Resident 1 and was rough with him when putting him in bed.
- When asked Staff 2 stated, based on the evidence Staff 1 was rough with Resident 1 and Staff 1 also hit the hand of Resident 1.
October 28, 2025Inspection
- Staff 6’s (hire date 8/14/25) did not contain a current first aid certification.
- Staff 7’s (hire date 8/12/25) did not contain a current certification in first aid within 60 days of employment.
- Staff 1 and Staff 2 were unable to provide documentation of first aid certification for Staff 6 and Staff 7.
- Resident 1’s record did not contain a disclosure statement from the facility.
- Resident 2’s record did not contain a disclosure statement.
- When asked, Staff 1 and Staff 2 were unable to provide disclosure statements for Resident 1 and Resident 2.
- of an annual review of resident rights and responsibilities with each resident or their legal representative, was filed in the resident’s record. Evidence:
- Resident 1’s (admit date 5/14/24) record did not contain an annual review of resident rights and responsibilities.
- Resident 2’s (admit date 10/24/22) record did not contain an annual review of the rights and responsibilities of residents.
- Resident 5’s (admit date 1/5/24) record did not contain an annual review of the rights and responsibilities of residents.
- When asked, Staff 1 and Staff 2 were unable to provide documentation of an annual review of resident rights and responsibilities with Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 5.
- Resident 1’s record did not contain a written assurance document signed by the facility administrator.
- Resident 2’s record did not contain a written assurance document signed by the facility administrator.
- When asked, Staff 1 and Staff 2 were unable to provide a written assurance document for Resident 1 and Resident 2.
- Resident 5’s last documented tuberculosis assessment was dated 4/16/24.
- Resident 3’s last documented tuberculosis assessment was dated 4/16/24.
- Resident 1’s last documented tuberculosis assessment was dated 5/23/24.
- Resident 4’s last documented tuberculosis assessment was dated 4/16/24.
- Staff 1 and Staff 2 were unable to provide documentation of risk assessments for tuberculosis for Resident 5, Resident 3, Resident 1, and Resident 4.
- Licensing inspector reviewed facility documentation and there was no documented evidence of a semi annual review of the emergency preparedness and response plan for all staff, residents, and volunteers.
- When asked, Staff 1 and Staff 2 were unable to provide documentation of a semi annual review of the emergency preparedness and response plan.
- Resident 3 has an order for DNR.
- Resident 3’s individualized service plan dated 9/26/2025, states they are full code.
- Staff 2 stated the DNR orders could be found in the facility’s electronic system, however it was not noted on the current individualized service plan.
- Licensing inspector reviewed resident 5’s record and there was no documentation of a six month review of appropriateness of placement in the special care unit.
- Resident 5 was admitted to the special care unit on 10/15/24.
- When asked, Staff 1 and Staff 2 were not able to provide documentation of a six month review of appropriateness of placement in the special care unit.
- Resident 1’s record did not contain documentation of an orientation to the facility.
- Resident 2’s record did not contain acknowledgement of having received an orientation to the facility.
- Resident 4’s record did not contain acknowledgement of having received an orientation to the facility.
- Resident 5’s record did not contain documentation of an orientation to the facility.
- When asked, Staff 1 and Staff 2 were unable to provide documentation of an orientation to the facility for Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 4, and Resident 5.
September 15, 2025Complaint survey
January 15, 2025Complaint survey
January 15, 2025Complaint survey
January 15, 2025Complaint survey
January 15, 2025Complaint survey
October 31, 2024Inspection
- Staff #2 Documented date of hire: 12/13/2023 Upon request and review of facility records with staff #3 the facility did not submit for the inspector’s review documented evidence that they had obtained verification that staff #2 is free of tuberculosis in a communicable form. The Virginia Tuberculosis(TB) Assessment form in the employee’s record that was submitted for the inspector’s review is not dated to verify that the screening assessment was conducted on owithin seven days prior to the first day of work at the facility.
- Accompanied by facility staff #s 3 and 8 on11/20/2024 and as evidenced by the photographs taken on the safe and secure environment of the facility the windows in room #s 145, 140, 116 and a window in the common area near room # 145 did not have protective devices that would prevent the windows from being opened wide enough for a resident to crawl through.
- Staff #1 Documented date of hire: 12/13/2023 Staff #1: verification that the facility had obtained a copy of the staff’s criminal record report. Staff #3 stated that the document was not in the employee’s facility records or archived record.
- of: Facility annual training for two of the staff records reviewed. -Resident Hospice contract - Home health agreement/assessment/notes for resident
October 31, 2024Complaint survey
- Resident #1 The facility submitted for the inspector’s review a 07/27/2024 physician’s order for 1-500mg tablet of the medication Levothyroxine to be administered to the resident daily. The resident’s medication administration record (MAR) charting for July 2024 that was submitted for the inspector’s review is not documented to note that the medication Levothyroxine was administered to the resident as prescribed.