Mulberry Creek Assisted Living was inspected 11 times between October 31, 2023 and October 9, 2025 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 5 of those visits ended with violations cited and 6 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 20 violations under 18 distinct standards. 4 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window and no longer serves any of these on its site. All 11 are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
11Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
October 9, 2025Inspection
- On 07/25/2025, LI received a phone call from staff 1 reporting that an investigation of staff 2 was in progress for suspicion of misappropriation of resident funds. Staff 1 also indicated that local law enforcement was also working with the facility to determine the total dollar amount, and which residents were affected.
- On 08/21/2025, LI received a written update from staff 1 on the investigation which confirmed that staff 2 was no longer employed at the facility as of 07/25/2025, and staff 1 had indicated the name of the local law enforcement investigator who was assisting with the investigation at the facility.
- On 10/09/2025, LI performed an on-site follow-up to the self-report and reviewed and obtained documentation that was compiled by staff 1 regarding an approximate total of $2,582 that was misappropriated from 18 resident accounts since February 2025. Staff 1 revealed to LI that as a result of the facility’s investigation, the previous employee (staff 2) has been charged for embezzlement by local law enforcement; however, the facility has reimbursed all 18 affected residents.
July 22, 2025Complaint survey
March 25, 2025Inspection
- On the date of inspection, on the REPORT OF PHYSICAL EXAMINATION for resident 1, the following fields were blank or incomplete: The person’s address and telephone number; Significant medical history; Description of the person’s reactions to allergies.
- An interview with staff 4 was unsuccessful at locating a REPORT OF PHYSICAL EXAMINATION for resident 1 where all fields were completed.
- During a physical plant walk-through of the facility on the date of inspection, at 09:50 AM and 02:40 PM, LI did not see any menu (day or weekly) for meals and snacks that was posted within the facility.
- A discussion with staff 4 was unable to identify any area(s) of the facility where the weekly menu was posted for residents.
- During the physical plant walk-through of the facility on the date of inspection, at 08:59 AM, LI observed a bottle of CVS Health Artificial Tears and a tube of CVS Health Ultra Strength Muscle Rub pain relieving cream on the nightstand next to resident 7’s bed.
- A review of resident 7’s record revealed that she does not have physician’s orders for the use of artificial tears nor the muscle rub.
- An interview with staff 4 on the date of inspection confirmed that there are no physician’s orders for the use of the artificial tears or the muscle rub that were in resident 7’s room.
- During the physical plant walk-through of the facility on the date of inspection, at 09:36 AM, LI observed a tub of ARCTIC ICE PAIN RELIEVING GEL on the nightstand next to resident 5’s bed.
- A review of resident 5’s record revealed that she does not have physician’s orders for the use of pain-relieving gel.
- An interview with staff 4 confirmed that there are no physician’s orders for the use of pain-relieving gel that was in resident 5’s room.
- During the on-site inspection, the record for resident 3 contained a medication order summary, signed 03/20/2025, for CARVEDILOL ORAL TABLET 3.125 MG “ Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Heart Health ” Hold if SBP < 100 or HR < 60.
- A review of the February 2025 medication administration record (MAR) for resident 3, regarding the CARVEDILOL ORAL TABLET 3.125 MG, indicated that staff 5 administered that medication on the following dates and times even though the pulse reading (HR) was below 60: 02/09/2025 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 59; 02/12 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 58; 02/13 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 57; 02/23 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 57; 02/26 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 57; 02/27 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 56.
- A review of the March 2025 MAR for resident 3 regarding the CARVEDILOL ORAL TABLET 3.125 MG, indicated that staff 5 administered that medication on the following dates and times even though the pulse reading (HR) was below 60: 03/04/2025 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 57; 03/07 at 2000, resident 3’s pulse reading was 57.
- An interview with staff 4 on the date of inspection confirmed that staff 5 had administered the medication on dates and times when the pulse reading (HR) was outside of the ordered parameter.
March 25, 2025Complaint survey
December 10, 2024Complaint survey
September 24, 2024Inspection
June 13, 2024Inspection
April 10, 2024Inspection
- The record for resident 3, date of admission 11/10/2023, contained documentation that a sex offender search had occurred on 04/09/2024.
- Interview with staff 4 revealed that there were no sex offender checks for resident 3 prior to admission.
- The medication management plan for the facility, last revised on 07/17/2023, states that medications in storage or refrigeration are checked daily for expiration dates.
- The unit 2 medication cart contained a BASAGLAR KWIKPEN 100UNIT/1ML insulin pen for resident 5, with a filled date of 03/21/2024, with instructions to INJECT 10 UNITS SUBCUTANEOUSLY AT BEDTIME FOR DIABETES MELLITUS. The bag that contained the insulin pen contained a label which stated "STORE IN REFRIGERATOR UNTIL OPEN. ONCE OPEN MAY STORE AT ROOM TEMPERATURE FOR ____ DAYS". The bag also contained a blank label with fields for DATE OPENED, EXP. DATE, and INITIAL.
- The insulin pen itself was not labeled with an open date or expiration date, and it was reading as being about halfway full of insulin based on the plunger location in the tube.
- Staff 1 confirmed to LI that this insulin pen appeared to have been used but there was no open date or expiration date indicated.
- The record for resident 2 contained physician’s orders, signed 03/21/2024, for the following heart medication with parameters: CARVEDILOL ORAL TABLET 3.125 MG “Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for Heart Health ” Hold if SBP < 100 or HR < 60?. On the March 2024 medication administration record (MAR) for resident 2, on 03/12/2024 at 20:00, the blood pressure reading was noted as 99/48 and the pulse (heart rate) reading was 58; however, the MAR also indicated that the CARVEDILOL medication was checked as given on that date and time. On the April 2024 MAR for resident 2, on 04/06/2024 at 08:00, the blood pressure reading was 115/89 and pulse (heart rate) was 61; however, the exception note on that date and time indicates that the CARVEDILOL was held ?Pulse below 60/min?. On 04/07/2024 at 08:00, the pulse (heart rate) reading was 56; however, the MAR also indicated that the CARVEDILOL medication was checked as given on that date and time. On 04/08/2024 at 08:00, the pulse (heart rate) reading was 60; however, the exception note on that date and time indicates that the CARVEDILOL was held “Pulse below 60/min”.
- The record for resident 2 contained physician’s orders, signed 03/21/2024, for the following heart medication with parameters: FUROSEMIDE ORAL TABLET 40 MG “Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day for CHF ” Hold if SBP < 100?. On the March 2024 medication administration record (MAR) for resident 2, on 03/06/2024 at 08:00, the blood pressure reading was 115/47; however, the exception note on that date and time indicates that the FUROSEMIDE was held ?Pulse below 60/min?. The orders for FUROSEMIDE do not indicate to hold based on the pulse reading. On 03/07/2024 at 08:00, the blood pressure reading was 123/53; however, the exception note on that date and time indicates that the FUROSEMIDE was held “Pulse below 60/min” The orders for FUROSEMIDE do not indicate to hold indicates that the FUROSEMIDE was held “Pulse below 60/min”. The orders for FUROSEMIDE do not indicate to hold based on the pulse reading. On the April 2024 MAR for resident 2, on 04/04/2024 at 08:00, the blood pressure reading was 136/56; however, the exception note on that date and time indicates that the FUROSEMIDE was held “Pulse below 60/min”. The orders for FUROSEMIDE do not indicate to hold based on the pulse reading. On 04/08/2024 at 08:00, the blood pressure reading was 134/66; however, the exception note on that date and time indicates that the FUROSEMIDE was held “Pulse below 60/min”. The orders for FUROSEMIDE do not indicate to hold based on the pulse reading.
- Staff 4 acknowledged to LI that there were some errors on March and April MARs for resident 2 regarding administration of CARVEDILOL and FUROSEMIDE.
January 10, 2024Inspection
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon entering the facility on 01/10/2024, LI observed that the facility’s previous license, under the previous licensee, was posted and that the new licensee’s conditional license was not posted. An email had been sent to the new licensee on 12/01/2023 at 04:06 PM which contained the conditional license and cover letter that indicates that it is necessary that the conditional license be prominently posted in the facility at all times.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for staff 2 and staff 3, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the resident records have been updated with a disclosure statement under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for staff 2 and staff 3, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the staff records have been updated with a staff orientation and initial training under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for staff 2 and staff 3, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the staff records have been updated to reflect the date of hire and verification that the staff person received a copy of his or her current job description under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for staff 2 and staff 3, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the staff records have been updated with an initial (7-day) tuberculosis assessment under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for resident 1 and resident 2, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the resident records have been updated to reflect resident agreement documentation under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for resident 1 and resident 2, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the resident records have been updated to reflect this orientation under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for staff 2 and staff 3, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the staff records have been updated with sworn disclosure documentation under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
- During the mid-way monitoring inspection for the conditional license on 01/10/2024, LI attempted to perform a 60-day follow up with facility staff under the new licensee to ensure compliance with regulations for licensed assisted living facilities and terms of the license issued by the department.
- Upon a review of records for staff 2 and staff 3, staff 1 revealed to LI that none of the staff records have been updated with a criminal history record report under the new licensee, which became effective 11/30/2023.
December 8, 2023Complaint survey
- of successful completion of the education or training course required to act as a medication aide on a provisional basis for no more than 120 days before successfully completing any required competency evaluation. EVIDENCE:
- During the on-site complaint investigation on 12/08/2023, staff 2 indicated to LI that staff 1 was the RMA on duty that day in unit 2. During the inspection, LI observed staff 1 looking through the unit 2 medication cart and reviewing the e- MAR system at 10:35 AM. During this encounter, staff 1 revealed to LI that she has been working as a registered medication aide (RMA) since around February or March 2023, under the facility’s previous licensee. Staff 1 stated that she had taken the RMA curriculum training class in February 2023, had taken the exam, and was currently licensed as an RMA. Staff 1 revealed to LI that she did not have verification of her RMA licensure with her, but her current staff record, or Human Resources (HR) should have a copy.
- While performing the on-site complaint investigation on 12/08/2023, the record for staff 1 contained a signed job description, dated 02/07/2023, that staff 1 is a “Certified Medicine Aide” and ?is responsible for administering medications to residents as ordered by the attending physician and under the direction of the attending physician, charge nurse, and the Director of Nursing?. The record also contained a training certificate for staff 1 having completed the 68- hour Medication Aide Curriculum program, dated 02/01/2023. Alternately, the record for staff 1 did not contain evidence of RMA licensure nor did it contain a provisional RMA practice letter. Staff 2 indicated that she would have to locate and send verification that staff 1 is authorized to administer medications as an RMA.
- On 01/16/2024, staff 2 provided LI a training certificate for staff 1 having also completed the 68-hour Medication Aide Curriculum program on 07/29/2023. On 01/22/2024, staff 2 provided LI a copy of a letter, dated 12/26/2023, which indicated that staff 1 was authorized at that point to practice as a provisional medication aide and is eligible to take the RMA examination for licensure.
- The December 2023 MAR for resident 1 contained orders for CARVEDILOL TAB 3.125 MG ? Take 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. The orders also indicated to check BP and heart rate daily and to hold CARVEDILOL TAB 3.125 MG if systolic BP is less than 100 or heart rate less than 55.
- On the December 2023 medication administration record (MAR) for resident 1 on 12/05/2023, the heart rate (pulse) for resident 1 was recorded as 54; however, the MAR was signed by staff 1 as having given the CARVEDILOL medication.
- On 12/09/2023, the heart rate (pulse) for resident 1 was recorded as 44; however, the MAR was signed under staff 1 as having given the CARVEDILOL medication. On 12/10/2023, the systolic blood pressure reading was 90; however, the MAR was signed under staff 1 as having given the CARVEDILOL medication.
- Interview with staff 2 and signed statements by staff 1 and staff 6 revealed that staff 6 was the RMA who administered the CARVEDILOL medication on 12/09 and 12/10/2023 while logged in under staff 1 in the e-MAR system.
- The December 2023 MAR for resident 1 indicated that staff 1 administered the 08:00 AM medications on 12/09 and 12/10; however, an interview with staff 2 and signed statements by staff 1 and staff 6 revealed that staff 6 was the RMA who administered the 08:00 AM medications on 12/09 and 12/10 while logged in under staff 1 in the e-MAR system.