Living Well Assisted Living was inspected 9 times between November 2, 2022 and April 13, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 8 of those visits ended with violations cited and 1 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 60 violations under 48 distinct standards. 1 inspection was prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
Every inspection listed here is currently published on the VDSS site.
Provider Information
Inspection History
9Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
April 13, 2026Inspection
- Resident #1 (admitted 11/16/25) did not have written acknowledgement of the receipt of the disclosure statement by the resident or their legal representative in their record.
- Staff #2 was unable to provide documentation during the onsite inspection 4/13/2026 that the written acknowledgement of the receipt of the disclosure statement by the resident or their legal guardian was retained in the record for the resident.
March 28, 2025Inspection
- The record for Resident #3 did not contain the signed Written Assurance in the resident’s record during inspection on 3/28/25.
- Staff #2 confirms the Written Assurance was not present in the Resident’s record during inspection on 3/28/25.
- of this review shall be the resident's, his legal representative's or responsible individual's, or staff person's written acknowledgment of having been so informed, which shall include the date of the review and shall be filed in the resident's or staff person's record. Evidence:
- The record for Resident #3 did not contain the signed Rights and Responsibilities for 2025 (last 1/31/24) in the resident’s record during inspection on 3/28/25.
- Staff #2 confirms the Rights and Responsibilities was not present in the Resident’s record during inspection on 3/28/25.
- The physical examination for Resident #3 (completed 01/31/2024) was missing page 2 which reviews if Resident #3 has any of the conditions or care needs prohibited by 22VAC40-73-310 H.
- Staff #2 confirms page 2 of the ISP was not in the record during inspection on 3/28/25.
October 29, 2024Complaint survey
- The record for Resident #2 contained a Written Assurance document dated for 9/25/24, but it did not contain signatures from the resident or their legal representative.
- Staff 1 reviewed the record for resident #2 and acknowledged the Written Assurance document in the file dated for 9/25/24, but it did not contain signatures from the resident or their legal representative.
March 19, 2024Inspection
- Staff #1 was unable to provide documentation of the monthly checks of the first aid kit from June 2023-January 2024.
- Staff #2 was unable to provide documentation that staff had participated in an exercise in which the procedures for resident emergencies were practiced at least every six months.
- During a tour of the facility on 03/19/2024, the medication cart was observed to be unattended with the keys noted in the cart and not on the individual responsible for medication administration.
- During a tour of the facility, Resident #1 was noted in a common dining area with an oxygen concentrator with a long plastic tether line.
- Staff #1 confirmed the last medication review was conducted on 08/17/2023.
- The physical examination for Resident #2 (completed 01/31/2024) was missing page 2 which reviews if Resident #2 has any of the conditions or care needs prohibited by 22VAC40-73-310 H.
- During the tour of the facility on 03/19/2024, the current month’s activity calendar posted did not include the type and hour of the activity.
- There was not a health care oversight completed from 02/08/2023 to 01/19/2024.
- The UAI completed on 12/21/2023 for Resident #3 was not approved and signed by the administrator or the administrator’s designated representative.
- There was no documentation of a fire and emergency evacuation drill conducted from 05/31/2023-1/25/2024.
- Staff #1 confirmed the facility does not currently employ a qualified individual to supervise medication aides.
- There was not a dietary oversight completed from 03/29/2023 to 11/01/2023.
- Staff #3 was hired on 02/01/2024; however, the criminal history record report for Staff #3 was completed 08/28/2023.
- Resident #1 admitted to the facility on 12/21/2023 with an order for a puree diet with nectar thickened liquids; however, the order is not reflected in the resident’s record.
- The resident was not served food pureed at lunch while onsite on 03/19/2024.
- Staff confirmed there were no residents with a special diet.
December 28, 2023Inspection
- On 12/18/2023, Resident #1 wheeled themselves out of the front door and fell. The resident sustained a bruise and contusion to forehead with 5 stitches.
- Staff #2 was the designated person in charge at the time of the incident.
- Staff #3 reported Staff #2 was “inattentive” to the resident.
- Resident #1 meets the criteria for assisted living care and fell on 12/18/2023. The last fall risk rating completed for Resident #1 was 12/5/2022.
- Based on observation and discussion with Staff #1, all facility doors are secured upon entering and exiting the facility and only accessible via an access card.
- As of 12/13/2023, the facility has not employed a new administrator or appointed a qualified acting administrator causing a lapse in administrator coverage.
July 7, 2023Inspection
- Staff #4, Staff #5, and Staff #6 did not have a statement verifying that the criminal history record report by the Virginia State Police has been obtained within 30 days of employment, is on file at the temporary agency, and does not contain barrier crimes.
- Resident #2’s blood pressure check order reads the following: “check blood pressure while seated 3 times daily with meals for monitoring. If Blood Pressure <105/70, see as needed Midodrine Order.” Upon review of the June 2023 MAR, Resident #2 received 1 dose of Midodrine on 6/15/23, 6/17/23, 6/22/23, and 6/29/23. However, Resident #2’s BP met the parameters of <105/70 to receive Midodrine on the following days: 1 dose on 6/15/23, 1 dose on 6/23/23, 1 dose on 6/26/23, 2 doses on 6/29/23, and 1 dose on 6/30/23.
- The June 2023 MAR for Resident #1 indicates the resident was not administered their 8:00 PM medications (7 total) on 06/18/2023.
March 23, 2023Inspection
- During a tour of the facility, the medication cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended with the keys noted on the cart and not on the individual responsible for medication administration.
- Staff #5’s record did not include written acknowledgement of having been so informed of the review of the rights and responsibilities of residents within the last year as the last review was completed on 12/23/2021.
- While ensuring accurate counts of all controlled substances with Staff #6, it was discovered that the count indicated on the Controlled Drug Record was not consistent with the amount of medication for Resident #3’s Lorazepam .5 mg tablets with 11 noted on the record as available with 10 tablets on the medication cart and Resident #4’s Gabapentin 100 mg capsule with 47 noted on the record as available with 46 capsules on the medication cart.
- Staff #1 and Staff #6 acknowledged the Controlled Drug Record was not consistent with the amount of two medications identified on the medication cart.
- Based on record review, the UAI completed on 3/15/23 for Resident #1 was not approved and signed by the administrator or the administrator’s designated representative.
- Staff #3 (hire date 11/17/22) works as direct care staff and does not have documentation of a current certification in first aid in their staff record.
- Staff #1 was unable to provide the results of a TB risk assessment for Staff #6.
- The MAR did not include the following for Resident #1: date prescribed, diagnosis, condition, or specific indications for administering the drug or supplement, and name, signature, and initials of all staff administering medications.
- During a medication observation with Staff #6, the document that was being utilized as the MAR for Resident #1 were the physician order sheets for Resident #2 (one sheet) and Resident #3 (one sheet). The medications, date of birth, and names of Resident #2 and Resident #3 were marked thru, but still legible. The physician orders sheets included all other personal information of Resident #2 and Resident #3 to include their allergies, diagnoses, room number, and Medicare Number, and not information pertaining to Resident #1.
- Staff #1 and Staff #6 acknowledged the MAR being utilized to document medication administration of Resident #1 contained other resident information and did not include all of the required MAR items in the standard.
- During a review of Resident #2’s record, it was noted that on 2/1/23 Resident #2 fell out of bed, sustained a laceration to the back of the head, and was sent to the ER. The resident received stitches to the back of the head and returned to the facility. The assigned licensing inspector did not receive a notification of the incident.
- During the onsite inspection, Resident #1’s record did not contain a preliminary plan of care.
- Staff #1 acknowledged Resident #1 (admitted 3/21/23) did not have a preliminary plan of care.
- During the onsite inspection, Staff #1, Staff #5, and Staff #6 were unable to provide a method of written communication as a means of keeping direct care staff on all shifts informed of significant happenings or problems experienced by residents, including complaints and incidents or injuries related to physical or mental conditions.
- Staff #3’s record does not include verification that the staff person has received a copy of their current job description.
- During the onsite inspection, Staff #1 and Staff #2 were unable to provide evidence of the required six hours of training in working with individuals who have a cognitive impairment within four months of the starting date of employment and licensure (11/9/2023) for Staff #3 (hired 11/17/2022) and Staff #5 (hired prior to licensure).
- During the onsite inspection, shelves were noted outside the kitchen area in a resident hallway and contained a jug of vegetable oil and the staff member’s personal belongings (purse, water bottle, lunch, etc.).
- Staff #1 and Staff #2 acknowledged the potential of these ordinary materials or objects may be harmful to a resident with a serious cognitive impairment and were accessible to residents without staff supervision.
- Resident #1 admitted on 3/21/23, and their admitting physician orders (11 total) did not identify the diagnosis, condition, or specific indications for administering each drug.
- The records of Staff #3 and Staff #4 indicate the criminal history record reports were not completed by the facility administrator or licensee.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the criminal history record reports were completed by a separate organization/entity that is not owned nor operated by the facility.
- During the onsite inspection, there was no evidence of written assurance for Resident #1 (admitted 3/21/2023) or their legal representatives documenting that the facility has the appropriate license to meet their care needs at the time of admission.
- Upon entry on 03/23/2023, the signage of the manager on duty was blank and did not indicate the designated person in charge. Staff #4, Staff #5, and Staff #6 verbally stated Staff #6 was the designated person in charge; however, later Staff #1 stated Staff #4 was the designated person in charge at the time of the initiation of the inspection.
- On 03/23/2023, Staff #1 acknowledged the current on-site person in charge was no posted in a place in the facility that is conspicuous to the residents and the public.
- On the follow-up visit on 03/30/2023, the signage of the manager on duty was blank and did not indicate the designated person in charge.
- Resident #1’s record did not include a current picture or a narrative physical description in their resident record.
- Upon entry and during the tour of the facility, the area where resident records are stored was open, unlocked, unattended, and accessible.
- The records of Staff #6 and Staff #7 indicate the background checks are not completed by the Virginia State Police.
December 29, 2022Inspection
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, the Licensing Inspector did not observe paper towels or an air dryer for hand washing in a hall bathroom used for resident use. The hall bathroom had a hand towel available for use.
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, there was no evidence of written assurance to Resident #2, Resident #3 or their legal representatives documenting that the facility has the appropriate license to meet their care needs upon receiving licensure.
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, Resident #1 (admitted 11/26/2022) and Resident #3 did not have evidence of receiving orientation.
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, Resident #4 (admitted 12/02/2022) did not have written acknowledgement of the receipt of the disclosure statement by the resident or their legal representative in their resident record.
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, Staff #4 acknowledged Resident #4 did not have written acknowledgement of receiving the facility’s disclosure statement in their resident record.
- The facility did not obtain a completed criminal history record reports for Staff #2 and Staff #6 (both hired 11/17/2022) on or prior to the 30th day of hire.
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, Staff #4 was unable to provide documentation indicating Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, or Resident #4 have signed and dated their individualized service plan.
- On the admitting orders for Resident #1, there is an order for Flomax .4 mg tablet to be administered at night; however, the MAR and medication in the medication in the medication cart is in capsule form.
- The December MAR for Resident #2 indicates the resident received a multivitamin tab on the following days: 12/02/22-12/06/22, 12/08/22-12/10/22, 12/15/22, 12/16/22, 12/19/22-12/21/22, 12/26/22, and 12/27/22. However, during the onsite inspection on 12/29/22, Staff #5 presented a signed discontinued order for the medication dated 11/21/2022.
- A expired medication, Pantoprazole Sod DR 40 mg tablets expired 03/2022, for Resident #2 was observed in the medication cart for administration.
- Resident #4 admitted to the facility on 12/02/2022. A progress note dated 12/06/2022 indicates resident is diagnosed with advanced dementia, was physically aggressive with a family member, and admitted to an ALF due to the inability to manage the resident in the home setting.
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, Staff #4 acknowledged Resident #4 did not have a mental health screen completed in their resident record.
- During the onsite inspection on 12/29/2022, Resident #2 did not have a completed sex offender screening in their record.
- Staff #5 was unable to provide the physician’s order for Mucinex Fast-Max DM Max Liquid as shown on Resident #4’s MAR.