Kensington Reston Owner LLC was inspected 16 times between January 13, 2021 and December 11, 2025 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 6 of those visits ended with violations cited and 10 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 16 violations under 15 distinct standards. 2 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 13 of these 16 are still on the state's site; the other 3 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
16Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
December 11, 2025Inspection
- Facility documentation indicated that Resident #1 eloped from the facility's special care unit on 11/28/25. Resident #1 was reported to have gotten on the elevator and exited the building. Resident #1 told Staff #1 that she wanted to go downstairs. Staff #1 reported that she believed that Resident #1 was a visitor. Staff #1 then provided access to the elevator and assistance with the facility's front door, both of which require a key fob or door code to operate. A facility picture shows Resident #1 leaving the building at approximately 4:02 PM. Facility documentation indicated that Resident #1 walked to a nearby store after leaving the facility. Collateral #1 reported speaking with Resident #1 and Collateral #2, after Resident #1 asked for assistance in making a telephone call. Collateral #2 informed Collateral #1 that the resident lives at the nearby assisted living facility. Collateral #2 reported receiving the phone call at approximately 4:08 PM. Collateral #2 then contacted the facility to provide information about Resident #1's whereabouts. Collateral #1 escorted Resident #1 back to the facility and they were observed on a facility camera at approximately 4:15 PM. Resident #1's record contained an assessment of serious cognitive impairment form, dated 10/16/25, that states that she has a serious cognitive impairment and that she is unable to recognize danger or protect her own safety and welfare. Resident #1's individualized service plan (ISP), dated 10/20/25, states that she has a "current or history of occasional disorientation to person, place, time or situation even in familiar surroundings and requires supervision and oversight for safety." The ISP goes on to state that Resident #1 has "poor short term memory," and that the "care team will provide direction and supervise behaviors to ensure safe decisions are being made."
July 15, 2025Inspection
- Resident #3's record was reviewed during the inspection. Resident #3 was admitted into the facility's safe, secure, environment on 4/11/25. Resident #3's record contained an Assessment of Serious Cognitive Impairment form, dated 4/9/25. The form indicates that Resident #3 does not have a serious cognitive impairment due to a primary psychiatric diagnosis of dementia. Facility staff confirmed that no other Assessments of Serious Cognitive impairment, for Resident #3, were present at the time of the record review.
- Staff #3 was observed administering medication during the inspection. Facility documents indicate that Staff #3 is a nurse that was hired on 10/8/24. Staff #3's nursing license was not present in the staff record, at the time of the inspection. Facility staff confirmed that Staff #3's nursing license was not in the staff member’s record, at the time of the inspection.
- PRN Hydrocortisone Suppository and PRN Procto cream, ordered for Resident #8, were expired at the time of the medication cart inspection. The Hydrocortisone suppository package indicated that the medication expired in December 2024. The PRN Procto cream package indicated that it expired in June 2025. Facility staff confirmed that the medications were expired, at the time of the medication cart inspection. PRN Mupirocin ointment, ordered for Resident #8, was not present at the time of the medication cart inspection. Facility staff confirmed that the PRN Mupirocin ointment was not present, at the time of the medication cart inspection.
- Resident #7's July medication administration record (MAR) was observed during the inspection. Resident #7's Clonidine patch (ordered 2/17/25) was documented as not administered on 7/7/25. The MAR stated that the drug/item was not administered because it was "unavailable."
May 14, 2025Inspection
- The record for Staff #1, hired on 3/4/24, was observed during the inspection. Staff #1's record contained documentation of an initial review of resident rights in March 2024. No documentation was provided, during the inspection, to indicate that Staff #1 has completed a review of resident rights since March 2024. Facility staff confirmed that additional resident rights training, was not present in the record for Staff #1.
December 18, 2024Inspection
November 18, 2024Inspection
November 18, 2024Complaint survey
August 23, 2024Inspection
August 23, 2024Inspection
August 5, 2024Inspection
- The record for Resident #9 contained a hospice agreement between the facility and Company A that was not signed by a facility representative, or a representative of Company A.
- Private duty aide documentation was reviewed during the inspection. No criminal history record report or qualifications were included in the files for the private duty aides for Resident #12 or Resident #13.
- The facility's second-floor treatment cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended, during a facility tour at approximately 8:58 AM on 8/5/24.
- The second-floor treatment cart contained Resident #10's Ketoconazole cream (ordered 7/11/24).
- Staff #6 conducted the tour, and locked the cart after being informed that the cart was unlocked.
- Resident #4's record contained an order for Metoprolol Succinate 50mg to be administered daily. The order states "hold for systolic blood pressure <110 or Heart Rate <55."
- Resident #4's July and August MARs only contained documentation of the resident's vital signs on the first day of the month. No records were provided, during the inspection, to verify that Resident #4's blood pressure was taken before each administration of her Metoprolol Succinate.
- The facility's resident council binder was observed during the inspection. Notes from the 6/25/24 resident council meeting indicated that resident recommendations were provided regarding staff entry into resident rooms, and for regular visual sweeps of the dining room.
- The most recent resident council meeting occurred on 7/30/24. No written response to the resident recommendations from the previous meeting on 6/25/24 had been provided to the council, before the 7/30/24 meeting.
- Staff #6 confirmed that a written response had not been provided to the council regarding the resident recommendations.
- Resident #11's discharge documentation was reviewed during the inspection. Resident notes indicate that Resident #11 never returned to the facility after a hospitalization on 3/16/24.
- Resident #11's discharge statement indicates the resident’s contact person was notified about the discharge verbally on 3/16/24. No information was included on the discharge form, to indicate when and to whom the discharge statement was provided.
- Staff #6 confirmed that discharge notification was only provided verbally.
- Resident #1's UAI, dated 2/4/24, states hat she needs mechanical assistance and supervision for bathing. Resident #1's ISP, dated 3/2/24, states that she needs physical assistance for bathing.
- Resident #6's UAI, dated 6/6/24, states that he needs mechanical and physical assistance for toileting. Resident #6's ISP, dated 6/6/24, states that the resident requires one person assistance in managing bowel and/or bladder care.
- Resident #7's UAI, dated 4/16/24, states that the resident needs no assistance for bathing, dressing, toileting, or transferring. Resident #7's ISP, dated 4/16/24, states that the resident needs physical assistance for bathing, dressing, toileting, and transferring.
- The record for Staff #2, hired 8/24/15 as a LPN. Staff #6 reported that Staff #2 was originally hired at a sister facility, and that Staff #2 transferred to this facility on 10/25/22.
- Facility training documents indicate that Staff #2 attended 5.5 hours of training within the annual review period of 10/25/22 through 10/25/23.