Lansdowne Heights, LLC was inspected 25 times between August 4, 2021 and May 20, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 11 of those visits ended with violations cited and 14 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 25 violations under 19 distinct standards. 8 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 23 of these 25 are still on the state's site; the other 2 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
25Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
May 20, 2026Inspection
- On 04/20/2026, the facility reported an incident that occurred on 04/19/2026 in which Resident 1 fell and was placed back in bed following the discovery of Resident 1 on the floor of the bathroom. The report states that Resident 1 was sent to the hospital on 04/19/2026. In the follow-up report, dated 04/29/2026, the facility stated that Resident 1 fell on 04/17/2026 and was located by Staff 2 who notified Staff 3, the staff person in charge, at the time of the incident. The report stated that Staff 3 did not report the incident, and asked Staff 2 not to disclose upon notification that Resident 1 was at the hospital with a fracture.
- Resident 1’s progress notes did not include documentation of the incident that occurred on 04/17/2026. Resident 1’s progress notes do include PRN administration of pain medication on 04/18/2026, and documentation on 04/19/2026 of Resident 1 being sent out to the hospital due to tremors, poor body alignment, and Resident 1 only opening Resident 1’s left eye during assessment. The progress note stated that Resident 1 appeared to be in pain.
- Staff 2 and Staff 3’s written statements were reviewed. Staff 2’s statement indicates that Staff 2 entered Resident 1’s room around 10:00 AM and found Resident 1 on the bathroom floor. Staff 2’s statement describes Resident 1 as conscious but struggling to stand. Staff 2’s statement confirms that Staff 2 called Staff 3 to Resident 1’s room, where Staff 3 and Staff 2 assisted Resident 1 off the floor and to the toilet before Staff 3 left the room without completing an assessment. Staff 2’s written statement confirmed that Staff 2 did not document the fall.
- Staff 3’s statement confirms that Staff 3 was called to Resident 1’s room where Staff 2 and Staff 3 assisted the resident off the bedroom floor and returned Resident 1 to bed.
- A time-stamped document included with Staff 2 and Staff 3’s statements, prepared by Staff 4, indicates that Staff 3 entered Resident 1’s room at 9:59 PM and left at 10:02 PM.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/20/2026, Staff 1 stated that their procedures following a fall were not completed. Staff 1 confirmed that Resident 1 did not receive immediate medical attention after an incident, specifically a fall, occurred on 04/17/2026.
- On 04/20/2026, the facility reported that Resident 1 had an undocumented, unwitnessed fall that resulted in the resident being sent to the hospital on 04/19/2026. The follow up report, dated 04/29/2026, indicates that Resident 1 fell on 04/17/2026, and that Staff 2 and Staff 3 had failed to report the incident.
- On 05/20/2026, Staff 1 provided a copy of the Falls Protocol and Falls Protocol checklist. The protocol indicates that a head-to-toe assessment must be completed first, including LOC, pupils, injuries, behaviors, full set of vitals, and PMS in extremities. The second and third steps include addressing bleeding and/or wounds as appropriate. The fourth through seventh step indicate required contacts including the provider, 911, family or POA, and identified facility leadership. The eighth step includes documenting in the electronic record to include a detailed incident note, vital signs, and a falls form update. Follow-up should be completed at 24 hours, 72 hours, and seven (7) days.
- A written statement from Staff 2 states that a head-to-toe assessment was not completed. Staff 3’s statement indicates that vitals were not completed on 04/17/2026 or 04/18/2026. Statements written by Staff 2 and Staff 3 state that documentation of the incident was not completed.
- Resident 1’s progress notes did not include documentation of a fall on 04/17/2026, as confirmed by the written staff statements.
- Staff 3’s record included a termination notice, dated 04/21/2026, that stated Staff 3 was terminated due to not following facility procedures and protocol.
- In an interview with the LI on 05/20/2026, Staff 1 confirmed that Staff 2 and Staff 3 failed to follow facility policies and procedures related to falls protocol after Resident 1 had a confirmed fall on 04/17/2026 resulting in a fracture.
- On 04/20/2026, the facility reported that Resident 1 had an undocumented, unwitnessed fall that resulted in the resident being sent to the hospital on 04/19/2026. The follow up report, dated 04/29/2026, indicates that Resident 1 fell on 04/17/2026, and that Staff 2 and Staff 3 had failed to report the incident.
- Statements written from Staff 2 and Staff 3 confirm that the incident was not reported and/or documented in the residents’ records.
- Resident 1’s progress notes do not include documentation of communication with Resident 1’s preferred contact after Resident 1’s fall on 04/17/2026.
December 22, 2025Inspection
November 10, 2025Inspection
- On 11/03/2025, the facility submitted a reportable incident in which Staff 3 let Resident 1 out of the unit accidentally, resulting in Resident 1 entering the parking lot and being returned to the facility by Staff 4 within two minutes after exiting the building.
- On 11/10/2025, Staff 1 reviewed the video footage with the LI that confirms the information submitted in the report.
- In an interview with the LI, Staff 1 stated that Staff 3 had been out of the building when Resident 1 was admitted, and this was Staff 3’s first night in the building. Staff 3 confirmed supervision was not provided to ensure attention to specialized needs such as wandering from the premises.
August 28, 2025Complaint survey
- On August 18, 2025, at approximately 4:07 p.m., Staff 1 submitted an incident report via email to the licensing inspector regarding a potential environmental issue that occurred on August 15, 2025, involving suspected mold detected in the HVAC units of six occupied resident rooms.
- On 08/28/2025, in an interview with the LI, staff 1 confirmed the incident report was emailed on 08/18/2025, although the incident occurred on 08/15/2025.
- Photos evidence taken.
August 28, 2025Complaint survey
July 11, 2025Inspection
- On 07/11/2025, during the inspection, the licensing inspector (LI) observed six locked resident rooms on hallway one, two, three, and four.
- Staff 1 acknowledged that resident rooms were locked.
- Photos taken as evidence.
July 29, 2024Inspection
- .
- The facility failed to provide documentation of initial or annual receipt of information pertaining to the sex offender registry and how to obtain such information.
- Staff 1 verified this was not completed initially or annually for any residents.
- Resident’s 11and 12, had a signed physician order on file for oxygen.
- The physician’s order did not specify compressed gas or concentrators.
- Resident 1’s record contained an oxygen order from 10/26/2023, but no oxygen notification sign was posted for the resident’s room.
- Resident 11’s record contained an oxygen order from 10/16/2023, but no oxygen notification sign was posted for the resident’s room.
- Resident 12’s record contained an oxygen order from 10/16/2023, but no oxygen notification sign was posted for the resident’s room.
- The following resident ISP were not signed and dated by the licensee, administrator, or his legal representative. A. Resident 6’s ISP was revised on 5/29/2024. B. Resident 7’s ISP was revised on 05/14/2024. C. Resident 2’s ISP was revised on 03/30/2024. D. Resident 8’s ISP was revised on 05/14/2024. E. Resident 9’s ISP was revised on 06/06/2024. 2.Staff 2 and 3 interviews with the licensing inspector (LI) determined that ISPs are electronically emailed and not signed.