Indian River Assisted Living was inspected 26 times between January 27, 2021 and September 29, 2025 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 17 of those visits ended with violations cited and 9 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 75 violations under 51 distinct standards. 16 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 23 of these 26 are still on the state's site; the other 3 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
26Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
September 29, 2025Complaint survey
- A review of the record for Resident #1, admission date 2/4/22, contained a ISP that was not signed by the resident’s guardian.
- Staff #1 confirms the ISP in Resident #1’s record was not signed by the resident’s guardian.
- On 09/26/2025, during the medication cart audit for the North Hall cart, medications for Resident #1 were observed dispensed in a cup at 9:48am. According to the physician’s order, the medication administration time is 7:00 am.
- Staff #2 was asked why medications were dispensed and still on the cart, Staff #2 states Resident #1 prefers to take her medication after breakfast.
- During the exit on 9/26/25, Staff #3 was informed of the medications being on the cart by the licensing inspector, Staff #3 states she was unaware medications were dispensed but still on the cart.
September 18, 2025Complaint survey
- During the record review for Resident #1, admission date 4/11/2025, it was determined that the record did not contain a Comprehensive ISP. The preliminary plan was reviewed in the record, dated 4/11/25.
- Staff #1 confirms the preliminary plan was present in the resident’s record during the onsite inspection on 9/18/25.
- A Review of Resident #2s record contained a UAI dated 7/24/24. The facility did not update the UAI annually.
- Staff #1 confirms the UAI was not completed at the time of the onsite inspection on 9/18/25.
- of this review shall be the resident's, his legal representative's or responsible individuals, or staff person's written acknowledgment of having been so informed, which shall include the date of the review and shall be filed in the resident's record. Evidence:
- During the record review for Resident #2, the record contained a Resident Rights review dated 1/8/25 that was not signed by the Resident’s Guardian.
- Staff #1 confirms the document was not signed by Resident #2s Guardian at the time of inspection on 9/18/25.
- The MAR for Midodrine HCL 5mg tab did not indicate whether the medication was administered, or it was not administered on the following dates: 9/21/25 11:00 pm; 9/25/25 3:00 pm; 9/26/25 3:00 pm. Documentation did not indicate an error or refusal.
- The MAR for Midodrine HCL 2.5 mg tab did not indicate whether the medication was administered, or it was not administered on the following dates: 9/21/25 11:00 pm; 9/25/25 3:00 pm; 9/26/25 3:00 pm. Documentation did not indicate an error or refusal.
- The MAR for Gabapentin 400 mg capsule did not indicate whether the medication was administered, or it was not administered on the following dates: 9/25/25 12:00 pm
- Staff #1 and Staff #2 reviewed MAR and acknowledged the signatures were missing.
- A Review of Resident #2’s record contained a fall risk rating dated 2/14/19. The facility did not update the Falls Risk Rating annually.
- Staff #1 confirms the Falls Risk Rating was not completed at the time of the onsite inspection on 9/18/25 for Resident #2.
September 18, 2025Complaint survey
August 5, 2025Complaint survey
- During the record review for Resident #1, the record did not contain an annual ISP. The last plan was dated 7/30/24.
- Staff #2 states there was a level of care completed July 2025 and it was determined the facility could not provide the level of care Resident #1 required. Resident #1 was awaiting discharge at the time of the record review on 8/5/25.
- During the onsite inspection on 8/5/25, a review of Resident #1’s record contained a Physicians Order stating Resident #1 Refused Physician assessment, last seen 3/25/25.
- During the onsite inspection on 8/5/25, Staff #2 stated “A Level of Care assessment occurred during July, the resident is awaiting discharge as she needs a higher level of care”.
- The MAR for Resident #1 indicates medications were not administered to the resident due to documented refusals in the record: Atorvastatin 20 mg; Benztropine MES 1 mg; Loratadine 10 mg; Midodrine HCL 5 mg; Perphenazine 4 mg; Vitamin B-12 1,000 mcg; Vitamin D2 1.25 mg (50,000 unit); Acetaminophen 500 mg (prn) refused almost the entire month of June 2025, July 2025 and all of the month of August 2025 until she went out of the facility on 08/07/2025 and no evidence the physician or POA were notified of refusals.
- The record for Resident #1 has a physician order for monthly weights effective 08/04/2024. There were no set perimeters stated in the orders. The June, July and August 2025 medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #1 reveals a highlighted section for the 5th of the month that is blank. The MAR does not have documentation of the results of a weight on 06/05/2025, 07/05/2025 or 08/05/2025 as ordered.
- During an interview with Staff #1 and Staff #2 on 09/26/2025, it was revealed the highlighted section means something should be documented there but there is no evidence that any staff did it because the resident keeps refusing.
- Progress notes dated 1/25/2025 at 6:11 pm – “Resident #1 was in a very negative space today. Though she did take her AM medications, she refused to take her evening meds. The other RMA tried giving meds to her, and yet again she refused. Will reach out to her guardian to make aware of the situation.”
- Progress notes dated 2/26/2025 at 3:28 pm – “ Resident #1 refused the lab blood work and UA from homehealth so Dr. Kleiman tried to send her out to the ER to get Tx she refused that her POA was called about this left message. Dr. Klieman states we can’t do anything if she keeps refusing everything until it gets worse unfortunately.”
- Progress notes dated 6/20/2025 at 12:01 am – “ Resident #1 slipped in the shower onto the floor, and she did not bump her head. RMA and staff member helped her up off the floor and return her to the room. Resident #1 refused to go to the hospital for further evaluation.”
- Progress notes dated 6/20/2025 at 10:58 pm – “ Resident #1 refused her meds and seems to be experiencing anxiety hallucinations.”
- Physician orders dated for monthly weight by the 5th. On the June MAR dated 6/05/2025 states Resident #1 refused. On a physician assessment on 03/25/2025 it shows resident’s weight was 129 lbs. The physician documented “Her treatment will be dictated by her symptomatology and lab values.”
- Medications were not administered for Resident #1 as follows: Atorvastatin 20 mg; Benztropine MES 1 mg; Loratadine 10 mg; Midodrine HCL 5 mg; Perphenazine 4 mg; Vitamin B-12 1,000 mcg; Vitamin D2 1.25 mg (50,000 unit); Acetaminophen 500 mg (prn) refused almost the entire month of June 2025, July 2025 and all of the month of August 2025 until she went out of the facility on 08/07/2025 and no evidence the physician or POA were notified of refusals.
- The med management plan on page 30-31 reads in part the following: “Documentation of Medication Administration B. The facility is to have procedures to ensure that there is a consistent method of documenting why a medication was not administered…The employee is also to be knowledgeable of the facility's policy when a resident refuses medications, i.e., notifying the supervisor or physician. E. Any contact with the prescribing practitioner is documented in the resident's record. The employee needs to be knowledgeable of how to write a note in the residents’ record appropriately, i.e., dates and employee's signature. The employee also must be knowledgeable of the facility's procedures for documenting information that needs to be communicated to other staff or health professionals. This may be in the residents’ record or on some other document used to communicate with staff or health professionals.
August 5, 2025Complaint survey
- Resident #1 made a complaint stating on two separate occasions two staff employed by the facility touched him inappropriately, dates were not specified.
- During the onsite investigation on 8/5/25, Resident #1 stated staff #3 hit him on the wrist when he attempted to eat another residents’ breakfast.
- During the onsite investigation on 8/5/25, Staff #3 stated during the interview “I tapped food, it had medicine in it”.
- Staff #2 was present during the interview; he suspended staff #3 while an internal investigation was conducted. The claim was valid.
- During the onsite investigation on 8/5/25, Resident #1 stated staff #4 rubbed her breasts on his shoulders while asking him to be her date for the prom at the facility.
- During the onsite investigation on 8/5/25, Staff #4 stated she did ask Resident #1 to attend the prom, but did not touch him inappropriately and did not get in his body space.
- Staff #2 was present during the interview; Staff #2 stated an investigation was completed and no evidence of Staff #4 inappropriately touching Resident #1.
June 26, 2025Complaint survey
- During an tour of the facility, it was determined that temperatures exceeded 80 degrees. An emergency plan was not in place at the time of inspection.
- Staff #1 confirmed the Air Conditioning unit was not working on the North, South and East locations in the building.
- Staff #1 reports Atlantic Coast and Heating would be onsite on 07/09/2025 to repair the unit.
- During an interview with staff #1 on 06/26/2025, staff #1 reported he was waiting to take the test for the assisted living facility administrator license. This is more than 90 days since his appointment as Acting Administrator. The test date was not available during the inspection.
June 26, 2025Complaint survey
- A self report was received on 05/18/2025 of an incident requiring medical attention to resident #1 due to overdose.
- A Review of the record included medical documentation that indicates the incident occurred on 04/18/2025, and resident #1 required hospitalization following the incident at the facility.
March 25, 2025Complaint survey
- A complaint was received by licensing inspector that the facility has bed bugs and does not provide appropriate PPE for residents and staff.
- Staff #1 confirms the presence of bed bugs at the facility. Staff #1 provided to licensing inspector reports received from Pest Control shows treatment to the facility.
January 2, 2025Inspection
- The following staff records did not have a criminal history record report completed on or prior to the 30th day of employment: Staff #1 (hired 8/12/24), Staff #4 (hired 4/29/24), Staff #5 (hired 2/8/24), Staff #7(hired 3/6/24), Staff #8 (hired 4/16/24), Staff #9 (hired 2/29/24) at the time of inspection on 1/2/2025.
- Staff #1 confirmed the Criminal Record Reports were not completed.
- of this review shall be the resident's, his legal representative's or responsible individual's, or staff person's written acknowledgment of having been so informed, which shall include the date of the review and shall be filed in the resident's or staff person's record. Evidence:
- The record for resident #3 record did not contain the rights and responsibilities of residents document.
- The record for resident #4 record contained the rights and responsibilities of residents document that was dated 6/16/21.
- The record for resident #5 record contained the rights and responsibilities of residents document that was dated 12/11/19.
- The record for resident #6 record contained the rights and responsibilities of residents document that was dated 9/19/19.
- The record for Staff #3 contained the rights and responsibilities of residents document that was dated 1/21/22.
- The record for Staff #10 did not contain the rights and responsibilities of residents’ document.
- Staff #1 reviewed the records for residents #3, #4, #5, #6, and staff #3 and staff #10 but unable to provide documentation during the onsite inspection that the resident rights and responsibilities were reviewed annually for each of the residents and staff listed.
- d by the completion of the current screening form published by the Virginia Department of Health or a form consistent with it. Evidence:
- Staff #10’s record did not have documentation of the absence of TB in a communicable form on or within seven days prior to the first day of work at the facility.
- Staff #1 acknowledged there was no documentation of the absence of TB within the required time prior to the first day of work
- The following staff records did not have a the sworn statement or affirmation completed: Staff #1 (hired 8/12/24), Staff #6 (hired 12/3/24) at the time of inspection on 1/2/2025. 2.Staff #1 confirmed the sworn statement or affirmation were not completed.
- The record for resident #1 did not include a Sex Offender registry check prior to admission. The Sex Offender check in the record was dated 1/2/2025.
- Staff #1 confirmed the registry check in the file was the most current.
- During the medication cart inspection, Artificial Tears Eye Drops for resident #8 were found with an expiration date of 06/01/24.
- Staff #3 confirmed the medication for resident #8 was expired.
- Staff #1 was unable to provide documentation of monthly checks on the first aid kit.
- The first Aid kit did not contain Blankets, Disposable single-use breathing barriers or shields, Plastic bags; Scissors; Small flashlight and extra batteries; Thermometer; Triangular bandages; during the day of inspection.
- Staff #1 confirmed the first aid kit did not contain all required items.