Golden Years Assisted Living Facility, Inc. was inspected 30 times between September 22, 2020 and December 18, 2025 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 23 of those visits ended with violations cited and 7 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 147 violations under 71 distinct standards. 18 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 27 of these 30 are still on the state's site; the other 3 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
30Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
December 18, 2025Complaint survey
November 18, 2025Complaint survey
- The facility is licensed for residential and assisted living level of care.
- On 10/29/2025 the LI received a complaint alleging the facility’s administrator’s Administrator In Training license expired in April 2025.
- During the inspection on 11/18/2025, Staff #1 self-identified as the administrator of record.
- During the 11/18/2025 inspection, the Licensing Inspector searched the Virginia Department of Health Profession’s license lookup webpage for Staff #1’s name. The results revealed that Staff #1’s Acting Administrator in Training license expired on 04/14/2025.
- During the interview on 11/18/2025, Staff #1 acknowledged that Staff #1’s license expired on 04/14/2025. Staff #1 stated there have been no arrangements made to complete the licensure process required to become a licensed assisted living facility administrator.
November 18, 2025Complaint survey
- The Licensing Inspector observed live and crawling bed bugs on the bedroom wall of resident bedroom #3 on 12/16/2025. Photographic evidence taken during the inspection.
- Staff # 1 acknowledged the facility has an on-going pest control issue (bed bugs) which is being addressed. Interview with Collateral #1 confirmed the building is being treated for an insect infestation.
- d by the completion of the current screening form published by the Virginia Department of Health or a form consistent with it. Evidence:
- The most recent TB assessment in the file for Resident #1 (date of admission 6/1/2018) was dated 9/4/2024.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the TB assessment dated 9/4/2024 was the most recent.
- Resident # 1’s date of discharge from the facility was 10/11/2025, per the Discharge Notification statement. The resident’s representative/next of kin was provided with a final statement of account within 60 days of the discharge.
- Resident # 2’s date of discharge from the facility was 7/29/2025, per the Discharge Notification statement. The resident nor the resident’s representative was not provided with a final statement of account within 60 days of discharge.
- Staff #1 acknowledged that neither Resident #1 nor Resident #2 received a final statement within 60 days of their discharge.
- The Division received a complaint on 10/20/2025 regarding the facility discarding the personal belongings for Resident #1.
- A review of Resident #1’s file contained an incident report which detailed that on 9/17/2025, Resident #1’s roommate moved out of the facility and some of Resident #1’s belongings were inadvertently packed and taken with the roommate’s clothing.
- During the inspection Staff #1 acknowledged the incident occurred and the resident’s family had not been monetarily compensated for the items.
- The records for Resident #1 and Resident #2 contained discharge statements which did not document the reason for the discharge, the actions taken by the facility to assist the resident in the discharge and relocation process.
- The discharge statement for Resident # 2 did not contain the actual date of the discharge.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the discharged resident statements did not contain the required information.
- Documentation in the file for Resident #1 noted on 6/6/2025, the resident’s physician ordered for the resident to have GI consult – Colonoscopy. There was no evidence in the resident’s file that the resident had seen the specialist or received a colonoscopy.
- Staff # 1 acknowledged the facility did not have documentation the resident was seen by a GI specialist or received a colonoscopy.
October 27, 2025Inspection
October 17, 2025Complaint survey
- The physical for Resident #1 dated 8/15/2025 did not document the resident’s height or weight.
- Photographic evidence obtained at the time of
- The UAI (2/7/2025) for Resident # 1 states the resident has the following needs which were not identified on the resident’s most recent ISP (8/21/2025): disorientation- some spheres all the time (time and place), wandering, short-term memory loss and judgment problems.
- The physical (8/15/2025) for Resident #1 stated the resident was allergic to Tylenol. This was not identified on the resident’s ISP which stated the resident did not have any known allergies.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the above needs were not addressed on the resident’s ISP.
- Photographic evidence obtained at the time of inspection.
- The MAR for Resident #1 documented the resident’s blood glucose was 441 on 10/6/2025. The physician’s order states if the blood glucose is greater than 400 the physician should be notified. There was no documentation the facility contacted the physician as directed by the physician’s order.
- Staff #1 and #2 could not provide documentation the facility contacted the physician.
- Photographic evidence obtained at the time of inspection.
- Resident #1 was prescribed Insulin Lispro 100 unit.ML pen to be administered on a sliding scale 4 times a day before meals and at bedtime. 151-200= 2 units, 201-250= 4 units, 251-300= 6 units, 301-350= 8 units and 351-400=10 units. The October 2025 MAR for Resident #1 documented the resident’s blood glucose as being: 255 on 10/5/2025 at 7:30 am, 244 on 10/6/2025 at 7:30 am, 335 on 10/7/2025 at 7:30 am, 221 on 10/8/2025 at 7:30am, 174 on 10/11/2025 at 7:30 am, 325 on 10/12/25 at 7:30 am, 158 on 10/13/2025 at 7:30am, 270 on 10/14/2025 at 7:30 am, 270 on 10/14/2025 at 7:30 am, 187 on 10/15/2025 at 7:30 am, 178 on 10/16/2025 at 7:30 am, 126 on 10/17/2025 at 7:30 am. Resident #1’s documented blood glucose was: 125 on 10/4/2025 at 11:30 am, 202 on 10/6/2025 at 11:30 am, 314 on 10/18/2025 at 11:30 am, 325 on 10/14/2025 at 11:30 am, 146 on 10/15/2025 at 11:30 am, 153 on 10/17/2025 at 11:30 am. Resident #1’s documented blood glucose was: 228 on 10/2/2025 at 8:00 pm, 228 on 10/4/2025 at 8:00 pm, 242 on 10/4/2005 at 8:00 pm, 238 on 10/5/2025 at 8:00 pm, 441 on 10/6/2025 at 8:00 pm, 227 on 10/7/2025 at 8:00 pm, 288 on 10/9/2025 at 8:00 pm. The number of units administered to Resident #1 on the above dates and times were not documented on the MAR provided to the inspector at the time of the inspection.
- Staff #1 and Staff #2 acknowledged the MAR is not documented to reflect the number of units administered to the resident.
- Photographic evidence obtained at the time of inspection.
- The October 2025 Medication Administration Record for Resident #1 documented that the resident was out of the facility on the following days at an unknown location: 10/2/2025, 10/4/2025, 10/5/2025, 10/9/2025, and 10/13/2025. The physical for Resident #1 documented the resident as having dementia.
- Staff #1 acknowledged that Resident #1 exits the facility and walks the area.
- Photographic evidence obtained at the time of inspection.
October 7, 2025Inspection
- The last Resident Rights review documented in the record for Staff #2 was dated 5/28/2024.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the last documented review of Resident’s Rights in the file provided to the Licensing Inspector was dated 5/28/2024. Staff #1 acknowledged Resident’s Rights training had been provided to Staff # 2 since 5/28/2024, however the documentation of the training could not be located at the time of the inspection.
- On 10/6/2025, the facility self-reported an allegation of physical abuse made by the family of Resident #1. Resident #1 was interviewed by Licensing Inspector, and the resident denied any physical abuse by Staff #2, however the resident did indicate the staff member spoke to the resident in an inappropriate manner by teasing and using misgendering names towards the resident which upset him.
- Staff #1 acknowledged that Staff #2 had been placed on suspension while the facility conducted an internal investigation.
- The file for Resident #1 documented a fall which resulted in the resident going to the emergency room on 8/19/2025. There was no fall assessment in the resident’s file pertaining to the fall.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the file for Resident #1 did not contain a fall risk assessment for the resident’s fall which occurred on 8/19/2025.
- The ISP for Resident #1 (with an administrator signature date of 7/22/2025), did not contain a resident signature.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the ISP did not contain the resident’s or legal representative signature.
- The ISP for Resident #1 (with an administrator signature date of 7/22/2025), did not address all the resident’s assessed needs as documented on the Uniform assessment instrument (UAI) dated 3/31/2025. The UAI indicated the resident required mechanical help and physical assistance with bathing. The ISP for Resident #1 only indicated the resident required mechanical assistance. The UAI indicated the resident required human help-physical assistance with dressing, the ISP stated the resident required no assistance. The UAI indicated the resident required mechanical and physical assistance for toileting the ISP indicated the resident required mechanical assistance. The UAI indicated the resident required mechanical and human help with walking the ISP indicated the resident required mechanical assistance.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the ISP did not addressed all of the resident’s assessed needs which were documented on the UAI.
September 27, 2025Complaint survey
- The Licensing Inspector observed a live and crawling bed bug on the bedroom wall of resident #1 on the date of the inspection.
- Staff # 1 acknowledged the facility has an on-going contract for pest control contract but there continue to be reports of bed bugs.
- During the on-site inspection the facility’s current rotating emergency food stock, peanut butter, which was most of the emergency food, was expired with an expiration date of 6/20/2021.
- Staff #3 acknowledged the food was expired.
- On 9/27/2024, during the inspection of the facility, the Licensing Inspector observed carpet that was worn and taped down throughout the building (hallways leading to resident bedrooms, dining room, and common rooms used by the residents).
- Staff #3 acknowledged the carpet was worn.
August 27, 2025Inspection
August 27, 2025Complaint survey
- The August 2025 MAR for Resident # 1 for August 18, 2025, did not contain documentation of staff initials to indicate the resident received the following medications and supplements: Divalproex Dod ER 500 mg, Ensure High Protein, Levetiracetam 500 mg, Melatonin 3 mg, Midodrine HCL 5 mg, Rosuvastatin Calcium 20 mg, and Tamsulosin HCL 0.4 mg. The MAR also did not contain initials for August 22, 2025, to indicate if Resident #1 received the prescribed Midodrine HCL 5 mg and Olanzapine 5 mg. There were no notes or documentation on the MAR to indicate why the prescribed medications were not administered or why the MAR did not contain staff initials.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the August 2025 MAR for Resident #1 did not contain the proper documentation.
- The facility parking lot has multiple potholes and uneven pavement. A resident fell in a pothole on 4/8/2025 as documented in the Nurse’s Notes in the file of Resident #1.
- During the on-site inspections on 8/17/2025 and 10/27/2025 the Licensing Inspector observed at least 5 large potholes at least 12 inches in diameter and at least 2 inches deep.
- Staff #2 acknowledged to the Licensing Inspector on 10/27/2025, the parking lot is in need of repair.
- The resident file for Resident #1 contained documentation that the resident fell in a pothole in the facility parking lot on 4/8/2025.
- There was no fall risk assessment in the file associated with the 4/8/2025 fall.
- Staff #1 acknowledged there was no fall risk assessment in the file for the documented fall on 4/8/2025.
August 27, 2025Complaint survey
- The resident record for Resident #1 admitted 6/6/2025, did not contain an initial ISP for the resident. The ISP in the resident file contained an ISP dated 8/1/2025.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the ISP for Resident #1 was dated 8/1/2025.
- Resident #1 has been prescribed Sertraline 50 mg. There was no psychotropic treatment plan in the resident’s file presented to the inspector at the time of the inspection.