Commonwealth Senior Living at the Ballentine was inspected 13 times between February 10, 2021 and February 24, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 12 of those visits ended with violations cited and 1 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 42 violations under 30 distinct standards. 1 inspection was prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 11 of these 13 are still on the state's site; the other 2 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
13Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
February 24, 2026Inspection
- During observation of the medication cart with staff #4, the Licensing Inspector (LI) observed the following medications not properly stored according to the pharmacy label instructions to keep the medication refrigerated: • Lorazepam for resident #7 • Lorazepam for resident #8 • Lorazepam for resident #9 • Lorazepam for resident #10
- During an interview on 02/24/26 with staff #4, staff #4 confirmed the Lorazepam for residents #7, #8, #9, #10 are labeled to keep refrigerated however the medication was not kept refrigerated.
- The record for resident #1, admission date of 5/30/25, contains documentation of an orientation dated as completed on 9/26/25.
- During an interview on 02/24/2026 with staff #6, staff #6 confirmed the orientation for resident #1 is dated as completed on 9/26/25, after the resident’s admission.
- The record for resident #1, admission date 5/30/25,contains a sex offender search dated as completed on8/19/25. 2.During an interview on 2/24/26 with staff #6, staff #6confirmed the sex offender search for resident #1 was completed on 8/19/25, after the resident’s admission.
- The record for resident #1, admission date of 5/30/25, contains the following that documents the resident needs a mechanical soft diet: • An admission physical examination dated 5/30/25. • A dietary communication notification form dated 5/30/25. • A Physician order dated 01/09/26. Resident #1’s ISP dated 10/24/25 does not include the resident’s need for a mechanical soft diet and the ISP documents the resident’s diet as a regular diet.
- Resident #1’s UAI dated 10/24/25 documents the resident needs mechanical support with transferring. The resident’s ISP dated 10/24/25 does not include a mechanical support need for transferring and documents the resident does not require assistance with transferring.
- During an interview on 02/24/26 with staff #5, staff #5 confirmed resident #1’s ISP dated 10/24/25 does not include the resident’s need for a mechanical soft diet nor a mechanical support need for transferring.
February 24, 2026Inspection
December 11, 2025Inspection
- The record for resident #1, admission date 10/28/25, contains an ISP dated 10/28/25 that documents an allergy to seafood, need to monitor for allergies, and not to receive known allergy. 2.Resident #1’s incident report dated 11/01/25 documents the following: •Resident informed staff the resident needed something for allergy treatment because the resident had eaten fish for dinner. The resident was noted to be wheezing. •Resident has an allergy to seafood and was given fish at dinner when given a choice by staff. 3.During an interview on 12/11/25 with staff #3 and staff #5, staff #3 and staff #5 confirmed staff #1 provided resident #1 with a seafood meal that contained fish on 11/01/25.
- Resident #1’s emergency department hospital paperwork dated 11/01/25 documents the resident was evaluated for possible allergic reaction. The resident was prescribed Benadryl and Pepcid as needed for allergic symptoms.
July 9, 2025Inspection
- Resident #1’s incident report dated 06/26/2025 documents the following “elopement” that occurred on 06/21/2025 from the facility’s safe secure unit: “The Camera review showed resident pushing egress bar and exiting out of stairwell 2 door at 1:14 pm.”
- Staff #3 sent an email on 07/07/25 to the Licensing Inspector (LI) documenting that an alarm did not sound when resident #1 exited the safe secure unit though an exit door.
- During an interview on 07/09/25 with staff #1, staff #1 reported that on 06/21/25, resident #1 exited the safe secure unit through an exit door. Staff #1 confirmed the exit door was not secured with a lock, and the door alarm did not sound when the resident exited the door. 4.The record for resident #1 admitted to the facility’s safe secure unit on 06/19/25, contains an assessment for serious cognitive impairment that documents the resident has serious cognitive impairment due to a diagnosis of dementia and the resident is unable to recognize danger or protect his/her own safety.
- The record for resident #1 contains a physical exam dated 06/15/25 that documents a diagnosis of moderate dementia w/ anxiety.
- Resident’s #1 incident report dated 06/26/2025 documents the following “elopement” that occurred on 06/21/2025 from the facility’s safe secure unit: • “The Camera review showed resident pushing egress bar and exiting out of stairwell 2 door at 1:14 pm;” • Around 2:45 pm the facility received a call from the Norfolk fire department stating resident #1 was at Walgreens (115 West Little Creek Road, Norfolk, VA 23505) located a ½ mile from the facility.
- MapQuest directions identifies the route from the facility to Walgreens located at 115 West Little Creek Road as a distance of 0.55 miles with a duration time of 15 minutes when walking. The route includes a 0.3 mile walk along Granby St. Granby St. consist of 3 lanes on each side of the street.
- The record for resident #1 admitted to the facility’s safe secure unit on 06/19/25 contains an assessment for serious cognitive impairment that documents the resident has a serious cognitive impairment due to a diagnosis of dementia and the resident is unable to recognize danger or protect his/her own safety.
- The record for resident #1 contains a physical exam dated 06/15/25 that documents a diagnosis of moderate dementia w/ anxiety.
February 4, 2025Inspection
- The record for resident #1, admission date 01/18/24, did not contain documentation the facility provided an orientation to the resident and/ or their legal guardian upon admission. The orientation in the record was dated as completed on 02/04/25.
- During the medication cart observation with staff #3, the Licensing Inspector observed an unlabeled Lantus insulin pen.
- During a tour of the facility’s outside grounds, four of the windows appeared to have a rotted windowsill.
- The record for resident #1 contains physician orders dated 07/18/24, and 12/03/24 that includes the following instructions: “check resident’s weight monthly and record on the fifth.” Resident’s #1 Medication Administration Records for the months of September 2024 through January 2025 did not include documentation the resident’s weight was checked monthly.
- The record for resident #1, admission date 01/18/24, did not contain a written acknowledgement of the receipt of the disclosure statement by the resident or their legal representative.
- of such inspection. Evidence:
- The facility’s elevator inspection certificate expired 06/01/24.
July 2, 2024Inspection
- Resident’s #1 incident reports for “resident elopement” dated 6/07/24 and 6/14/24 documents the following: “sweet memories (facility’s safe secure unit) courtyard gate left unlocked by community’s landscaping company;” “resident breached the secured gate;” “resident found walking on the sidewalk by the community.”
- The record for resident #1 contains a progress note dated 6/07/24 that documents the following: “lawn care workers left the back gate open and resident walked out of the gate and walked across the street.” 3.During an interview with staff #1, staff #1 reported that resident #1 left the safe secure unit’s courtyard through an unlocked gate located outside. Staff #1 reported the courtyard gate was left unlocked by the community’s landscaping company.
- During observation with staff #2, the secured gate located outside of the safe secure unit’s courtyard was observed to lead to a sidewalk area that is not protected or secured by the facility. Staff #2 confirmed the secured gate observed was the gate left unlocked and the gate resident #1 exited during the elopement incident on 06/07/24.
- Resident’s #1 incident reports dated 6/07/24 and 6/14/24 documents the following “resident elopement” that occurred on 06/07/14: “sweet memories (facility’s safe secure environment) courtyard gate left unlocked by community’s landscaping company;” “resident breached the secured gate;” “ resident found walking on the sidewalk by the community;” “resident out 30 minutes or less.”
- The record for resident #1 contains a progress note dated 6/07/24 that documents the following: “lawn care workers left the back gate open and resident walked out of the gate and walked across the street.”
- During an interview with staff #1, staff #1 reported that resident #1 left the safe secure unit’s outside courtyard through an unlocked gate. Staff #1 reported resident #1 was on the sidewalk across the street from the facility when located by the facility staff.
- The record for resident #1 contains an approval for placement in the safe secure unit dated 03/19/19 and a review for appropriateness of placement in the safe secure unit dated 05/05/24.
- The record for resident #1 contains a uniform assessment instrument (UAI) dated 5/04/24 and an individualized service plan (ISP) dated 5/04/24 that documents a behavior pattern of wandering.
- The record for resident #1 contains a physician order dated 07/06/23 and a physician note dated 05/09/24 that documents a diagnosis of Dementia.
January 18, 2024Inspection
- Resident’s #1 incident report dated 12/17/23 documents the following information: On the date and time of 12/10/23 @ 12:09pm, “an RMA reported resident #1 was “prevented from eating her meal, by staff #2, the resident was admonished verbally as well as poked in the shoulder by staff # 2;” “Staff #2 was suspended pending investigation and released from employment.”
- During an interview with staff #1, staff # 1 stated staff # 1 observed staff #2 curse at resident #1.
January 16, 2024Inspection
- The facility’s fire and emergency evacuations drills dated 10/20/23, 11/23/23, and 12/28/23 did not include the following documentation: The method used for notification of the drill; number of staff and residents participating; any special conditions stimulated; the time it took to complete the drill; weather conditions; and problems encountered if any.
- Staff #8, hired 02/07/23, criminal record report contains two convictions for barrier crimes (18.2-57).
- During an observation of the facility’s basement area, water was observed on the floor throughout the entire basement. Staff #5 reported an outside vendor assessed the water in the basement area on 01/03/24 as coming from a “possible leak from a roof drain.”
- The record for resident #3 contains a physician order dated 07/06/23 for Atenolol “take one tablet by mouth every morning hold if systolic is less than 130 or if heart rate is less than 60.” Resident’s #3 Dec. Medication administration record (MAR) documents the resident was administered Atenolol on the following dates when the resident’s systolic was documented as being less than 130 and when the resident’s heart rate was documented as less than 60: 12/10/23, Systolic (117); 12/11/23, Systolic (124), heart rate (56); 12/13/23, Systolic (127); 12/14/23, Systolic (122); 12/18/23, Systolic (127); 12/23/23, Systolic (111); 12/31/23, Systolic (124).
- During observation of the facility on 01/16/24 at 8:10 am, the facility’s manager on duty posting listed staff #5 and staff #6 as the manager on duty. Staff #5 and staff #6 was not onsite in the building at 8:10 am. Staff #7 confirmed that staff #5 and staff #7 was not onsite in the building at 8:10 am.
- During observation on 01/16/24 at 8:10 am, the facility’s shift supervisor posting included the date for 01/15/24 and did not include a listing of the shift supervisor on duty for 01/16/24.
- The record for resident #1 contains a physician order dated 08/14/23 that documents to change diet to No added Salt (NAS) Mechanical Soft. The facility’s dietary oversight dated 10/30/23 includes a recommendation for a NAS, diet order. Resident’s #1 ISP dated 12/15/23 documents the resident’s diet as “regular diet” and does not include the resident’s dietary needs to include a NAS, and mechanical soft diet.
- The record for resident #1 did not contain a sex offender screening for resident #1.
October 3, 2023Inspection
- The record for resident #1 contains an incident report dated 09/08/23 documenting “staff #2 reported resident #1 was prevented from going to the restroom of resident #1’s choice and time of choice by staff #1. Resident #1 was admonished verbally and made to wait to use the restroom. Staff #2 was separated from employment, findings did show neglect.”
- During an interview with staff #2, staff #2 reported “hearing resident #1 request assistance from staff #1 to use the bathroom located in the facility’s common area, staff #1 informed resident #1 to “urinate in resident #1’s diaper and staff #1 refused to provide assistance to the resident to use the bathroom located in the facility’s common area.”
- Upon arrival at the facility on 10/03/2023 at 9:07 a.m. the Licensing Inspector (LI) observed a posting dated 10/07 and 10/08 that listed the “manager on duty” as staff #6. A posting dated 10/04 listed staff #5 as the “1'' shift supervisor”. Staff #5 and Staff #6 was not on site at the facility at the time of the LI arrival at the facility.
- Staff #4 acknowledged being the onsite person in charge, however there was no posting to include the name of staff #4 as the on-site person in charge and no posting identifying the on-site person in charge for the date of 10/03/2023.
February 7, 2023Inspection
- During observation of the facility on 02/07/23 and 02/08/23 the listing of staff certified in First Aid or CPR was not posted in the facility.
- Staff #2 and staff #7 acknowledged the listing of staff certified in First
- The record for resident #1, contains progress notes documenting a hospital admission the dates of 12/13/22 through 01/24/23.
- The record for resident # 3, contains progress notes documenting a hospital admission on the following dates: 01/24/23 through 01/27/23; 11/23/22 through 12/07/22; 12/08/22 through 01/10/23.
- Staff # 7 acknowledged an incident report was not submitted to the regional licensing office to report the hospital admissions for residents #1, and # 3.
- The record for resident # 1, did not contain documentation of a completed sex offender screening.
- by the completion of the current screening form published by the Virginia Department of Health or a form consistent with it. Evidence:
- The record for staff # 3, contains documentation of a TB risk assessment completed 12/17/19. There is no documentation of an annual TB risk assessment completed after 12/17/19.
- The record for staff #4, contains documentation of a TB risk assessment completed 07/03/21. There is no documentation of an annual TB risk assessment completed after 07/03/21.
- Resident’s #4, discharge statement dated 12/13/22 did not include documentation of the actions taken by the facility to assist the resident in discharge and relocation process.
- The facility provided documentation the facility participated in an exercise in which the procedures for resident emergencies were practiced on 12/12/22 and 01/24/23. The facility did not provide documentation of a practice of resident emergencies every six months during the year of 2022.
- Staff #2 acknowledged there is no evidence of documentation within the last year of the facility practicing procedures for resident emergencies every 6 months.
- The facility provided evidence of a fire and emergency evacuation drill dated 11/29/22. There was no evidence of the facility conducting fire and emergency evacuation drills on each shift at least quarterly.
- Staff # 2 acknowledged the facility did not have documentation of fire and emergency evacuation drills being conducted on each shift at least quarterly.
- The record for resident #7, did not contain documentation of a written assurance provided to the resident.