Brookdale Roanoke was inspected 15 times between April 19, 2021 and March 12, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 7 of those visits ended with violations cited and 8 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 18 violations under 17 distinct standards. 4 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 13 of these 15 are still on the state's site; the other 2 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
15Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
March 12, 2026Inspection
- The record for resident 3 contained documentation that the resident has been receiving hospice services from collateral 1 since 10/29/2025.
- The most current hospice plan of care for resident 3 contained orders from 02/25/2026 for: Home health aide (HHA) 2x per week for 1 week starting on 02/23/2026 (week 5) and 2x per week for 8 weeks starting on 03/01/2026 (week 6).
- The current hospice plan of care for resident 3 also contained orders from 03/02/2026 for: Social worker (MSW) 1x per month for 2 months starting on 03/02/2026 (week 6) and MSW (PRN) 5 visits starting 01/27/2026 (week 1). Reason for PRN: Change in condition/pt needs.
- The ISP for resident 3, dated 11/30/2025, did indicate that resident 3 has been receiving hospice services from collateral 1 since 10/30/2025; however, the ISP did not contain documentation of the services that will be provided by the hospice staff and how often, per the hospice plan of care.
- An interview with staff 4 and staff 5 was unsuccessful at locating an ISP for resident 3 where this information is documented.
October 21, 2025Inspection
March 12, 2025Inspection
January 15, 2025Complaint survey
January 15, 2025Complaint survey
July 30, 2024Complaint survey
June 28, 2024Inspection
- The Virginia Department of Social Services Standards for Assisted Living Facilities, last revised 10/13/2021, defines a licensed healthcare professional as “any health care professional currently licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia to practice within the scope of his profession, such as a nurse practitioner, registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, clinical social worker, dentist, occupational therapist, pharmacist, physical therapist, physician, physician assistant, psychologist, and speech-language pathologist”.
- According to the License Lookup webpage through the Virginia Department of Health Professions, staff 1 is registered to provide medications in an assisted living facility; however, staff 1’s position is not defined as a licensed healthcare professional.
- The facility’s direct care staff flowsheet for witnessed, unwitnessed, or suspected falls with head injury indicates that for falls with no apparent injury or minor injury (small laceration, bump, or bruise), the Health and Wellness Director/Nurse Designee (RN, LPN, LVN) is to be notified to evaluate and/or direct next the step.
- The facility’s incident report indicates that at around 05:45 AM on 06/14/2024, resident 1 appeared to have had a fall that was unwitnessed. Per the facility report, resident 1 appeared to have slipped in urine in his room and after being assessed, resident 1 had a small hematoma to the back of his head as well as a superficial abrasion to the left upper arm and elbow but was otherwise ok. Per the facility report, resident 1 was not sent out for evaluation, which is inconsistent with the facility’s fall protocol. The facility report also states that the family of resident 1 was not notified at the time of the fall.
- On 06/28/2024, during LI’s on-site follow up, staff 2 stated to LI that part of the facility’s internal investigation of the incident consisted of an interview with staff 1 who disclosed that, even though she is not a nurse or other licensed healthcare professional, she assessed resident 1 upon discovering him after a suspected unwitnessed fall. Despite having a small hematoma to the back of his head as well as a superficial abrasion to the left upper arm and elbow, staff 1 decided not to seek medical evaluation nor did she contact the facility’s Health and Wellness Director or other licensed healthcare professional to seek guidance on whether resident 1 should receive medical attention, as is instructed to do in the direct care staff flowsheet for resident falls.
- The facility’s incident report indicates that around 05:45 AM on 06/14/2024, resident 1 appeared to have had a fall that was unwitnessed. Per the facility report, resident 1 appeared to have slipped in urine in his room and after being assessed, resident 1 had a small hematoma to the back of his head as well as a superficial abrasion to the left upper arm and elbow but was otherwise ok.
- The facility’s incident report indicates that staff 1 did not notify resident 1’s family at the time of the fall. The facility report, and the interview of staff 2 revealed to LI that due to the time of morning, staff 1 had assumed that the oncoming 7 AM – 3 PM charge staff member in that unit would notify the family of resident 1; however, staff 1 did not inform that oncoming staff member at shift change that this task still needed to be completed. As a result, the resident’s family was not notified that he had fallen earlier that morning.
- In a separate interview, staff 3 revealed to LI that resident 1’s family only learned of the fall when they came to visit at the facility during the late morning on 06/15/2024. Once the family observed the abrasion to his elbow, they asked the direct care staff on duty how it occurred. It was at that time that the family learned of the unwitnessed fall that occurred the morning before, and the family decided to take resident 1 to the hospital for evaluation where he was diagnosed with a minor head injury.
April 2, 2024Inspection
- The form RECORD OF INITIAL STAFF TRAINING for staff 1 indicated that staff 1’s first day of work was 08/14/2023; however, the form was incomplete to show that staff 1 had received training the following areas: Use of the first aid kit and knowledge of its location; handwashing techniques, standard precautions, infection risk-reduction behavior, and other infection control measures; procedures for reporting and documenting incidents; methods of alleviating common adjustment problems that may occur when a resident moves from one residential environment to another; and the needs, preferences, and routines of the residents for whom they will provide care.
- Interview with staff 5 revealed that there is no other documentation which verifies that staff 1 had received initial training in those areas which were incomplete.
- The form RECORD OF INITIAL STAFF TRAINING for staff 2 indicated that staff 2’s first day of work was 10/05/2023; however, the form was incomplete to show that staff 2 had received training the following areas: Emergency and disaster plans for the facility; Procedures for the handling of resident emergencies; use of the first aid kit and knowledge of its location; handwashing techniques, standard precautions, infection risk-reduction behavior, and other infection control measures; procedures for reporting and documenting incidents; methods of alleviating common adjustment problems that may occur when a resident moves from one residential environment to another; and the needs, preferences, and routines of the residents for whom they will provide care.
- Interview with staff 5 revealed that there is no other documentation which verifies that staff 2 had received initial training in those areas which were incomplete.
July 11, 2023Inspection
- On the evening of 06/22/2023, LI received a self-report from staff 2 about a staff to resident incident. The report alleged that resident 1 had called for assistance while toileting between 03:00 AM and 03:30 AM on 06/22/2023. The report further alleged that staff 1 responded to the request for assistance but refused to assist resident 1. Then, staff 1 was reported to have pushed resident 1 and threw a plastic fork at him. The report added that there was no injury to resident 1 and that staff 2 was suspended pending an investigation.
- During the on-site incident follow up on 07/11/2023, staff 2 revealed to LI that during their investigation, staff 1 did not confirm that an assault had occurred; however, staff 1 did admit that she felt uncomfortable helping resident 1 that morning, so staff 1 distanced herself from resident 1, left the room, and asked staff 3 to assist him with toileting instead, so staff 3 provided him assistance.
- Further interview with staff 2 revealed that staff 3 did provide assistance to resident 1 at the time of the incident, and staff 1 is no longer employed at the facility.
April 11, 2023Inspection
- At approximately 9:21AM during on-site inspection, collateral 1 (LI) noted a container of Super Sani-cloth germicidal disposable wipes and a spray bottle of 14 Antibacterial All-Purpose Cleaner located in the unlocked cabinet above the small sink in the Cottage kitchen. Both items contained a warning to keep out of reach of children.
- The flooring in front of the dresser in room 35 contained a large area of a dark staining. Also, collateral 1 (LI) noted a quarter sized hole in the flooring beside the end of bed in room 35.
- It was noted by collateral 1 that the carpet in the back corner beside the window in the Cottage living room contained a large area of staining. The carpet in the Cottage living room contained small pieces of debris along the baseboards, mainly behind the furniture. The baseboards in the Cottage dining room contained areas of peeling and chipping white paint. Also, in the Cottage dining room, the wall by a table that is pushed up against the wall appeared that something had been spilled down the wall.
- The baseboards in the Country dining room contained areas of peeling and chipping white paint
- d by the completion of the current screening form published by the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) or a form consistent with it. EVIDENCE:
- The record for staff 2, date of hire 08/30/2022, contained a VDH TB risk assessment form for staff 2; however, the document did not contain a date of when the risk assessment was completed.
- Interview with staff 6 confirmed this was accurate and there was no other TB risk assessment document for staff 2 to indicate this was done on or within seven days prior to staff 2’s first day of work.