Sunrise at Hunter Mill was inspected 11 times between November 13, 2020 and May 7, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 9 of those visits ended with violations cited and 2 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 22 violations under 18 distinct standards. 1 inspection was prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 10 of these 11 are still on the state's site; the other 1 has since dropped off it and is reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
11Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
May 7, 2026Inspection
November 20, 2025Inspection
- During facility tour on 11/20/2025, Two licensing staff observed two second floor resident rooms did not have screens.
- Staff confirmed the missing window screens with licensing staff outside of the facility.
- Resident 3’s record contained an oral order taken on 10/30/2025 for “Wound care – Stage 4 sacrum pressure injury….”. The order was not signed as of date of inspection on 11/20/2025.
- Staff 4 confirmed that Resident 3 has been obtaining wound care services for the Stage 4 wound.
- Licensing staff did not observe a valid order from a physician or other prescriber for Resident 3’s wound care treatment as of 11/20/2025.
- Resident 3 began receiving hospice services on 09/03/2024 per hospice documentation. Resident 3’s ISP dated 07/28/2025 did not include hospices services that are being provided by each party.
- Resident 4’s physician order to admit to hospice for wound care was dated 10/03/2025. Resident 4’s ISP dated 07/08/2025 with an indication that the ISP had a revision on 10/15/2025 did not include hospice services that are being provided by each party.
- Staff 2 and Staff 4 acknowledged Resident 3 and Resident 4’s ISPs did not contain the specific services provided by the facility and the licensed hospice organization in the plan.
- Resident 1’s record contained oral order taken on 05/20/2025 for Morphine 20mg Q4 hours PRN that was not signed by a physician as of date of inspection on 11/20/2025.
- Resident 3’s record contained the following oral orders that were not signed as of date of inspection on 11/20/2025: - 10/30/2025 for “Wound care – Stage 4 sacrum pressure injury….”. - 10/29/2025 to DC “Morphine ER 15mg…” and to start “Oxycodone 10mg...” - 10/23/2025 oral order to DC “morphine 100mg PRN…” and “Oxycodone 10mg tablet PRN…” - 10/23/2025 oral order to “Edit/Start - Oxycodone 325mg tablet…” - 10/21/2025 oral order to DC “metoprolol ER 25mg…” and to Start “Morphine ER 15mg…” - 10/18/2025 oral order to start “2-guard BID…” and “Morphine 20mg…” - 08/19/2025 for detailed wound care cleansing orders. - 08/14/2025 for detailed wound care cleansing orders.
- Staff 2 and Staff 4 acknowledged the unsigned oral orders in Resident 1 and 3’s record.
- During inspection on 11/20/2025, Resident 3’s medical record contained an unsigned physician order stating, “Wound care – Stage 4 sacrum pressure injury”. Additionally, Residents 3’s ISP dated 07/08/2025 with a revision date of 10/15/2025 indicated having “Stage 4 pressure ulcer on coccyx”.
- Staff 2 to provided list of additional residents with wounds which included Resident 4’s medical documentation titled “IDG Meeting Review” dated 10/15/2025 (electronically signed by physician, nurse practicer, Chaplin and Social worker for the resident) assessment indicating that Resident 4 has a “Stage 4 pressure ulcer to right hip and buttocks and left inner new, and unstageable to left heel are getting worse, requiring wound care days increased to three times a day, Also continue to manage wounds and foul odor….”
- During inspection on 11/20/2025, Resident 5’s medical documentation from 11/12/2025 visit indicates having a “Stage 3 Pressure injury acquired on 10/07/2025…” and further stated that Resident 5’s wound has worsened with a new areas of DTI.
- Staff 2 and Staff 4 both confirmed Resident 3 and Resident 4 both have Stage 4 wounds and are presently still retained as residents at the facility.
- During inspection on 11/20/2025, two licensing inspectors observed first floor door leading to an outside sitting patio area to be locked with keypad and code from the inside. From the outside of the door, two licensing staff observed that the door was locked from the outside leading back into the facility requiring a code as well. The door was not within the safe, secure environment.
- During inspection on 11/20/2025, two licensing inspectors observed two first floor doors within the activity room leading to an outside front porch sitting area to be locked. The two doors observed were not within the safe, secure environment.
- Staff 4 confirmed that the doors are locked and require code to enter and exit.
November 25, 2024Inspection
September 19, 2024Inspection
- LI also observed Lidocaine 4% patches prescribed to Resident 4 unsecured on top of the cart.
- Facility staff down the hall informed LI that staff 2 was currently in a resident 4’s room administering medications at the time of observation.
- LI obtained photo evidence.
- Healthcare oversight documents dated 6/25/2024 did not identify the residents reviewed during oversight period.
- During interview on 09/19/2024, staff 4 confirmed the 06/25/2024 health care oversight report did not specify the residents included the oversight period.
- LI requested documented Emergency preparedness semi-annual review. Staff 4 provided a ‘midnight census’ dated 6/28/2024 with “semi-annual review” hand-written at the top.
- Staff 4 confirmed that the review dated 06/28/2024 did not contain signatures or dates.
- LI obtained photo evidence
December 7, 2023Inspection
- Resident #11’s MARs were observed during the inspection. Resident #11’s record contained an order for Metoprolol, dated 9/21/22, that calls for the medication to be held if the resident’s systolic blood pressure (SBP) is less than 100 and heart rate (HR) is less than 60. Resident #11’s MAR states that her Metoprolol was held on 11/15/23, 11/18/23, 11/22/23, 11/24/23, and 12/2/23 due to her vitals being outside of the parameters. Resident #11’s MAR did not contain the resident’s vitals for 11/15/23, 11/18/23, 11/22/23, 11/24/23, and 12/2/23. No documentation was provided, during the inspection, to identify what Resident #11’s vitals were on these dates.
- Resident #1’s record was reviewed during the inspection. Resident #1’s ISP, dated 9/8/23, states that the resident receives hospice services, does not walk, and uses a hoyer lift for transfers. Progress notes, included in Resident #1’s record, indicate that he was walking independently on 10/27/23 and that he was discharged from hospice on 11/4/23. During the inspection, Resident #1 was observed walking and transferring without a hoyer lift.
June 15, 2023Inspection
- The morning medication administration, for Resident #8, was observed during the inspection. Resident #8's medications were removed from their medication packages, and placed in a pill sleeve to be crushed. Resident #8's medications were crushed and administered in yogurt. Protonix, ordered 9/21/22, was one of the medications that was crushed and administered. The Protonix medication package states that the medication should not be crushed.
February 27, 2023Inspection
- The morning medication administration, for Resident #2, was observed during the inspection. Resident #2’s order, for Vitamin D2, did not include the strength of the supplement.
- The morning medication administration was observed, for Resident #1, during the inspection. Resident #1’s Synthroid was administered at approximately 8:27 AM. The medication package stated that it should be given on an empty stomach. At approximately 8:50 AM, Resident #1 was observed eating breakfast. Resident #1’s Synthroid was not administered at least one-half to one hour before eating breakfast.
December 2, 2022Inspection
- Upon the licensing inspector’s arrival at the facility at 8:01 AM, the facility’s front door was unable to be opened from outside the building. Shortly after the inspector arrived, a visitor attempted to exit the building using the front door. He pushed on the door, but it would not open. The visitor stated that he was unable to open the door, as he did not have the code for the door. No staff members were present to open the door, and the visitor pushed on the door for 15 seconds, in order for the door’s security to be released. After the door was opened, a staff member was located and informed about the door. Facility staff reported that a staff member was supposed to be present to open the door for visitors. There is a device that would allow the staff member to disengage the door’s security, so that it can be freely opened. The Fairfax Fire Marshal’s office was contacted about the facility’s permit to secure the front doors. The Fire Marshal’s representative reported that their office did not have a permit on file, for the facility to secure doors that lead outside.
- Resident #1’s November MAR (medication administration record) was reviewed during the inspection. Resident #1 receives Eliquis twice per day. The MAR states that Resident #1’s Eliquis wasn’t administered on 11/21/22, 11/22/22, or 11/23/22. Resident #1’s morning administration of Eliquis was also not administered on 11/24/22. The MAR listed Resident #1’s Eliquis as a “medication pending delivery,” on those dates.
June 27, 2022Inspection
- Resident #1’s June MAR (medication administration record) was reviewed during the inspection. Resident #1 receives Amlodipine Besylate at bedtime. Resident #1’s Amlodipine Besylate order, dated 3/9/22, states that the medication should be held when her systolic blood pressure is below 120. Resident #1’s MAR indicated that the medication was administered on 6/4/22, when her systolic blood pressure was 112. The medication was also documented as being administered on 6/11/22, when her systolic blood pressure was 116.
- Resident #4’s PRN Famotidine, Midazolam, and Tylenol suspension were not available for administration, at the time of the medication cart inspection. Facility staff confirmed that Resident #4’s PRN Famotidine, Midazolam, and Tylenol were not available for administration, at the time of the medication cart inspection.
August 10, 2021Complaint survey
- The record for Resident #1, admitted 4/22/21, was observed during the inspection. Resident #1's Uniform Assessment Instrument (UAI), dated 4/22/21, states that the resident needs mechanical and physical assistance for walking and mobility. Resident notes indicate that Resident #1 fell on 4/22/21 (4:15 PM), 4/27/21 (4:15 AM and 11:00 AM), and 4/28/21 (1:10 AM, 6:00 AM, and 9:15 AM). Some progress notes reported that Resident #1 was agitated and anxious after falling, and PRN medication was given as a result. No information was found in the record to document an analysis of the circumstances of the falls and interventions that were initiated to prevent or reduce risk of subsequent falls. Facility staff confirmed that no additional information was present, to document the required information.