COMMONWEALTH SENIOR LlVING AT CHURCHLAND HOUSE was inspected 16 times between January 4, 2021 and April 28, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 15 of those visits ended with violations cited and 1 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 43 violations under 27 distinct standards. 7 inspections were prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 12 of these 16 are still on the state's site; the other 4 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
16Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
April 28, 2026Inspection
- The record for resident #1 contains the following progress note dated 03/24/26, documented by staff #2 (medication aide): Staff observed red/purple bruising on left eye and left side of nose. The resident’s record did not contain documentation of the resident receiving any medical attention from a licensed healthcare professional within 24 hours.
- During an interview on 04/28/26 with staff #3 (licensed health care professional), staff #3 stated their initial assessment and attempt to provide medical attention to the resident was on 03/26/26. Staff #3 observed a purplish/red bruise on the resident’s left eye. Staff #3 proceeded to apply a cold pack to the resident’s eye however the resident refused for the cold pack to be applied. Staff #3 stated the resident’s physician was notified of the bruise to the resident’s eye on 04/02/2026.
- The record for resident #1 does not contain documentation of staff #3 assessing the resident on 03/26/26, observation of the resident’s eye nor the medical attention staff #3 attempted to provide and the resident’s refusal.
- The record for resident #1 contains the following: • A physician communication form dated 04/02/26 notifying the physician of the bruise on the resident’s eye. • A Physician note dated 04/02/26 of the resident’s visit with the physician for observation of the bruise on the eye.
- Resident #1’s individualized service plan (ISP) dated 03/20/26 documents the resident has a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and resides in the facility’s safe secure environment.
- Resident #1’s Uniform Assessment Instrument (UAI) dated 03/20/26 documents the resident’s orientation as disoriented, some spheres, all the time
- During an interview on 04/28/26 with staff #1, staff #1 stated on 03/23/26 at 5am, staff #1 observed resident #1 on the floor of the resident’s bedroom and staff observed the resident lying on the stomach. Staff #1 proceeded to assist the resident off the floor. Staff #1 confirmed staff #1 did not document the incident in the resident’s record nor in the staff-to-staff communication log.
- The record for resident #1 nor the facility’s communication log contain documentation of staff #1 observing resident #1 on the floor on 03/23/26.
January 21, 2026Inspection
- During a tour of the facility on 01/21/26 the Licensing Inspector (LI) observed resident records located in the lobby. The resident records were not in a locked area.
- During an interview on 01/21/26 with staff #4, staff #4 observed the resident records and confirmed the resident records were not in a locked area.
- Resident #1’s, (admitted to safe secure environment on 01/15/26) assessment for serious cognitive impairment dated 01/02/26 documents a response of “No” for the question, Is the Individual named above unable to recognize danger or protect his/her own safety and welfare.
- During an interview on 01/21/26 with staff #6, staff #6 confirmed resident #1’s assessment for serious cognitive impairment did not document the resident had an inability to recognize danger or protect her own safety prior to the resident’s admission to the safe secure environment on 01/15/26.
- The water temperature measured in resident #4’s restroom sink was measured to be 94°F.
- Staff #5 confirmed the water temperature measured in resident #4’s restroom sink was measured to be 94°F.
August 14, 2025Complaint survey
- The record for resident #1 contains the following: • A physician note and hospital discharge summary signed and dated by the physician on 11/26/24 that includes instructions to take paroxetine 20 mg daily for major depressive disorder. • a physician visit note dated 12/04/24 that includes instructions to take paroxetine 20mg, 1 tablet by mouth once a day • a physician visit note dated 05/19/25 that includes instructions to take paroxetine 20mg, take 1 tablet by mouth every night at bedtime.
- Resident #1’s November 2024, December 2024, January 2025, February 2025, March 2025, April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, and July 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) did not include paroxetine as a listed medication for medication administration.
- During an interview on 08/14/25 with staff #1, staff #1 stated resident #1 was not administered paroxetine during the timeframe of November 2024 through June 2025. Staff #1 stated the medication was to be filled and provided by the resident’s family however the facility did not have documentation of the facility’s attempts to receive the medication from the family nor the facility’s attempts to fill the medications per the instructions as provided in the resident’s physician notes.
August 14, 2025Inspection
- Resident #1’s incident report dated 07/31/25 documents the following incident: • On 07/17/25 at 10:34 pm, “while resident was being transferred from shower chair to wheelchair resident became weak unable to stand and was lowered to the floor by staff, who requested immediate assistance to transfer resident back to wheelchair and into bed. Resident did not complain of pain at this time.” • On 07/22/25 at 10:30 am, “x-ray was ordered per physician, resident sent to ER.”
- The record for resident #1 contains the following: • A progress note dated 07/18/25 stating the resident is complaining about her right leg and right hip hurting. An x-ray exam was completed on the resident. • x-ray results sent to the facility on 7/18/25 at 22:47/10:47 pm documents “Bones are osteoporotic. A right hip prosthesis is seen. A distal femoral nondisplaced oblique fracture is seen in the supracondylar region. Nondisplaced distal femoral supracondylar fracture.”
- During an interview on 08/14/25 with staff #1, staff #1 confirmed resident #1’s x-ray results were sent to staff #1’s fax machine located in staff #1’s locked office however staff #1 was not working at the facility when the x-ray results were sent. Staff#1 did not read the results until 07/21/25 when staff #1 returned to the facility. Staff #1 confirmed the direct care staff was aware of resident #1’s completion of an x ray, but the direct care staff did not have access to the results.
- Staff #1 confirmed resident #1’s physician order instructing the facility to send the resident to the emergency department (ED) was sent to the facility on 07/21/25 however staff #1 did not read the physician order until 07/22/25 and the resident was sent to the ED on 07/22/25 around 10:30 am. The resident did not receive treatment until the 4th day after the x ray results were completed.
- The record for resident #1 contains hospital notes (page 5) dated 07/22/25 that document the following: • “right distal femur metaphysical comminuted closed fracture. Other fracture of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture.” • The patient was treated non operatively and was placed in a hinged knee brace locked in 30 degrees of flexion, The leg was wrapped in soft roll and an ace wrap to help protect the skin from the brace. The resident returned to the facility on 07/22/25.
January 14, 2025Inspection
- The record for resident #1 contains the following progress notes: 11/09/24 “resident did not return from hospital on 7-3 shift.” 11/09/24 “resident is still in the hospital. Daughter called and said he would not be coming back today.” 11/10/24 “resident returned home around 2:45 pm.” The resident’s record did not contain documentation of reason for the resident’s hospital visit to include problems experienced by resident, incidents, or injuries.
- Upon arrival at the facility on 01/14/2025 at 8:09 am, the Licensing Inspector (LI) observed a posting of the Manager on Duty listed as staff #5 and the Shift Supervisor listed as staff #7. Staff #4 and staff #6 was not on site at the facility upon the LI arrival.
- Resident’s #3 UAI dated 7/26/24 documents the resident needs mechanical help for walking and mobility. The resident’s ISP dated 7/23/24 does not include the mechanical help needed for walking and mobility.
- Resident’s #4 UAI dated 10/26/24 documents the resident needs mechanical help for transferring. The resident’s ISP dated 10/26/24 does not include the mechanical help needed for transferring.
- Staff #4, date of hire 10/01/24, criminal record report contains two convictions for barrier crimes (18.2-57).
October 22, 2024Complaint survey
- The record for resident #2 contains an Individualized Service Plan (ISP) dated 7/12/24 that documents the following: resident has a diagnosis of “dementia” and residents in the “memory care unit.” “resident requires occasional reminding with how to use the emergency response system.” “status checks, 2 per shift.”
- The facility’s round logs did not include documentation status checks, 2 per shift, and 2-hour rounds from the time the resident went to bed each evening until arisen in the morning were completed for resident #1 on the following dates: (a) 8/8/24, 8/9/42, 8/13/24, 8/15/24, 8/17/24, and 8/30/24 during the 7am to 3pm shift. (b) 8/3/24, 8/4/24, 8/6/24, 8/14/24, 8/17/24, 8/18/24, 8/26/24, and 8/27/24 during the 3pm to 11pm shift. (c) 8/24/24 and 8/29/24 during the 12pm to 7am shift.
- The record for resident #2, admission date of 5/31/24, did not contain a UAI completed prior to admission. The UAI in the record is dated 6/03/24.
- The record for staff #1, hire date 5/07/24, did not contain documentation of staff #1 meeting one of the direct care staff qualifications.
- The record for staff #1 contains a new hire form that documents staff #1’s job title as a personal care assistant (PCA). Staff #5 was unable to provide documentation staff #1 completed a personal care aide training program approved by the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services.
July 25, 2024Complaint survey
- The facility’s medication management plan includes the following: “shift counts are performed at the end of each shift or when the person responsible for medication changes.”
- The facility’s “Narcotic Shift Count” form did not include staff signatures for both the off going and oncoming shifts for the following dates and shifts: 06/04/24, 3-11 Shift. 06/04/24, 11-7 shift. 06/07/24, 11-3 shift. 06/20/24, 3-11 shift. 06/22/24, 7-3 shift. 06/23/24, 7-3 shift. 07/14/24, 3-11 shift. 07/17/24, 7-3 shift.
- Resident’s #3 “Controlled Drug Record” documents the resident was given one tablet of Tramadol as a PRN on the dates of 04/09/24 and 04/13/24. Resident’s #3 MAR for April 2024 does not include documentation the resident was given Tramadol as a PRN on the dates of 04/09/24 and 04/13/24 and does not include symptoms for which the Tramadol was given and the effectiveness for the dates of 04/09/24 and 04/13/24.
- The record for resident #3, admission date 12/07/23, contains a preliminary plan of care dated 12/07/23. Resident’s #3 ISP is dated as completed on 02/10/24. The resident’s record does not contain an ISP completed 30 days after the resident’s admission date of 12/07/23.
February 8, 2024Inspection
- The record for resident #2, admission date 12/31/22, contains a preliminary plan of care dated 12/31/22, and an ISP completed 03/14/23 and 08/23/23. Resident’s #2 record does not contain an ISP completed within 30 days after the resident’s admission date.
- The record for resident #3, admission date 12/15/23, contains a preliminary plan of care dated 12/14/23. The record for resident #3 does not contain an ISP completed within 30 days after the resident’s admission date.
- Staff #6 confirmed the records for residents #2 and #3 does not contain an ISP completed within 30 days after the resident’s admission.
- The facility’s record contains an annual fire inspection completed on 02/14/22. Staff # 6 acknowledged the facility’s record of the last fire inspection completed is dated 02/14/22 and the facility has no record of an annual fire inspection being completed for 2023.
- The record for resident #1 contains a physician order dated 10/11/23 documenting the following instructions: “Take blood pressure Q AM if systolic is less than 110 administer Midodrine 2.5mg.” Resident’s #1 record and the Jan. 2024 Medication administration record (MAR) does not include documentation the resident was administered Midodrine when the resident’s systolic was documented on the MAR as being less than 110 on the following dates: 01/02/24 through 01/10/24, and 01/15/24 through 01/25/24.
- The record for resident #2 contains a hospice care evaluation and a hospice care plan with an effective date of 11/29/23. Resident’s #2 progress notes documents resident is currently receiving hospice care services. Resident’s #2 most recent ISP in the record is dated 08/23/23. The record for resident #2 does not contain an ISP completed when the resident began receiving hospice care services effective 11/29/23.
- Resident’s #7, discharge statement dated 09/20/23 did not include the following documentation: actions taken by the facility to assist the resident in discharge and relocation process and the resident’s destination.
- The record for resident #2 contains a hospice care evaluation and a hospice care plan with an effective date of 11/29/23. Resident’s #2 progress notes documents resident is currently receiving hospice care services. Resident’s #2 most recent UAI in the record is dated 08/23/23. The record for resident #2 does not contain a UAI completed when the resident began receiving hospice care services effective 11/29/23.
September 25, 2023Inspection
June 27, 2023Complaint survey
- The record for resident #1 contains an Individualized Services Plan (ISP) dated 04/16/23 documenting the resident requires assistance with bathing and identifies Direct Care Staff as the persons to provide the assistance. The resident’s record, skin assessment sheets, and shift to shift communication log included documentation the resident received assistance with bathing once a week on 05/11/2023, during the week of 05/07/23 through 05/14/2023, and once a week on 05/29/2023 during the week of 05/28/2023 through 06/04/2023.
- The record for resident #2 contains an ISP dated 06/13/22 documenting the resident requires assistance with bathing and identifies Direct Care Staff as the persons to provide the assistance. The resident’s record, skin assessment sheets, and shift to shift communication log did not include documentation assistance with bathing occurred twice a week during the timeframe of 05/13/2023 through 05/23/2023.