Riverside Assisted Living at Patriots Colony was inspected 9 times between September 29, 2020 and April 13, 2026 by the Virginia Department of Social Services. 9 of those visits ended with violations cited and 0 with none. Across that history VDSS cited 41 violations under 26 distinct standards. 1 inspection was prompted by a complaint.
A violation is a licensing standard - a rule in the Virginia Administrative Code - that the inspector found the facility was not meeting. Each is shown with the evidence the inspector recorded and, where VDSS publishes it, the facility's own plan of correction.
VDSS publishes inspections on a rolling window. 7 of these 9 are still on the state's site; the other 2 have since dropped off it and are reproduced from Assisted Living Magazine's archive of the original VDSS reports.
Provider Information
Inspection History
9Select an inspection to read the areas reviewed, the inspector's comments and any violations cited.
April 13, 2026Inspection
- Staff #2 and staff #3 acknowledged there was no discharge documentation for resident #5. Resident #5’s discharge date was documented as 12/24/2025.
March 11, 2025Inspection
- On 3-11-25, the Resident Program Staff schedule provided for January, February and March 2025 noted only the first name of staff and no department or job classification. Dietary staff schedule did not include job classification.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the department schedules did not include all required information.
- On 3-11-25, resident #1’s uniformed assessment instrument dated 5-2-24 noted the resident was disoriented some spheres (time, place, situation), some time. The ISP dated 5-2-24 noted resident to be reorientation, how the services were to be provided was not documented.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s ISP did not include all required information.
- On 3-11-25 during the medication pass observation with staff #2 on the facility’s safe, secure unit, resident # 7’s Eucerin cream was observed on a table in the resident’s room. The resident’s physician’s order noted the cream was prescribed on 2-7-25. The resident #7’s uniform assessment instrument (UAI) dated 1-28-25 documented resident’s medication is administered by nursing staff.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s medication should be stored on the facility’s medication cart and not in the resident’s room.
- On 3-11-25, resident #3’s uniformed assessment instrument (UAI) dated 5-9-24 noted bowel need assessed as less than weekly and bladder need assessed as greater than weekly. The ISP dated 5-9-24 did not document resident’s use of adult briefs for incontinence. The resident’s transferring need assessed as mechanical help/physical assistance. The resident’s ISP noted resident’s use of a wheelchair to transfer onto the toilet. Staff #1 stated resident does not use a wheelchair.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s ISP did not include all required care needs.
- On 3-12-25, resident #6, record documented the sex offender information was ascertained on 11-13-24. The resident’s date of admit to the facility was noted as 11-7-24.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s sex offender information was not ascertained prior to admission to the assisted living facility.
- On 3-11-25, the posted menu in the safe, secure unit did not document the change of orange slices to include the fruit cup observed being served during the breakfast meal.
- Staff #7, preparing the meal acknowledged the orange slices were not available and the fruit cup was substituted. Staff was shown the menu which was not changed to reflect the substitution.
- On 3-11-25, resident 3’s approval for placement in the facility’s safe, secure unit was documented by staff #1 but the date was not documented. Prior to placement could not be determined.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s approval document by the facility did not have a date.
- On 3-11-25, resident #3’s preadmission physical examination dated 5-8-24 documented the resident “required continuous licensed nursing care, needs continuous supervision”.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s physical examination did not meet assisted living criteria.
March 25, 2024Inspection
- On 3-25-24, resident #5’s UAI dated 9-18-23 noted transferring assessed as mechanical help (mh). The ISP revised on 1-15-24 did not include transferring need.
- Resident #7’s UAI dated 10-05-23 noted walking assessed as no help needed. The ISP revised on 10-12-23 noted “resident does not need help…walking: human help physical is needed”. Wheeling assessed as mechanical help/human help/physical assistance (mh/hh/pa). The ISP noted “wheeling: human help physical is needed”. ISP noted “abusive/aggressive/disruptive -less than weekly…redirect: familiar topics”. The UAI did not include an assessment for abusive/aggressive/disruptive behaviors.
- Staff #1 acknowledged, the residents’ UAI and ISP did not match and/or included all elements required for the ISP.
- On 3-25-24, resident #1’s individualized service plan (ISP) completed 11-8-23 was not signed and dated by the resident nor the resident’s legal representative.
- Staff #1 stated the resident’s caregiver, C-1 signed for the resident’s representative. Staff did not have documentation from the resident’s representative authorizing C-1 to sign resident’s ISP.
- Staff #7 provided the inspectors with documentation of the representative’s verbal consent. This note was written on 3-25-24 following, the inspector’s conversation with staff #1 regarding no documentation of consent in the resident’s record.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the facility did not have written consent for C-1 to sign the resident’s ISP and the ISP was not signed and dated by the resident’s legal representative.
- On 3-25-24, resident #1’s uniformed assessment instrument (UAI) dated 11-8-23 noted toileting need assessed as mechanical help/human help/physical assistance (mh/hh/pa). The ISP dated 11-8-23 noted “toileting does need help”. Eating/feeding need assessed as human help/supervision (hh/s). The ISP noted “does need help”. Walking assessed as mh/hh/pa. The ISP noted “mechanical help and human physical help is needed-uses walker”. Stairclimbing assessed as mh/hh/pa. The ISP noted “mechanical and human physical help is needed”. Mobility assessed as mh/hh/pa. The ISP noted “mechanical and human help physical: uses wheelchair for distances”. Orientation assessed as disoriented some spheres all the time to time and place. The ISP noted, “offer to call family”.
- Resident #3’s UAI dated 1-31-24 noted bathing need assessed as mechanical help/human help/supervision (mh/hh/s). The ISP dated 2-14-24 noted “bathing does not need help”. Transferring assessed as mh. The ISP noted “mechanical help” no mechanical device noted. Walking assessed as mh. The ISP noted “mechanical help is needed”, no mechanical device noted. Mobility assessed as mh. The ISP noted “requires mechanical help”, no mechanical device noted. Medication assessed as administered by facility staff. The ISP need did not include who, what, when, where or goal for this assessed need (area of document is blank).
- Resident #4’s UAI dated 1-13-24 noted walking need assessed as not performed. The ISP noted “walking: mechanical help is needed. Walker and electric scooter, manual wheelchair”. Wheeling assessed as no help needed. The ISP noted “wheeling: mechanical help is needed. Uses electric scooter and a manual wheelchair elevated by PT for safety”. Dressing assessed as no help needed. The ISP noted “does need help, shoehorn to help apply shoes”. Mechanical help. Assessed needs did not match ISP care needs.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s assessed needs and the ISPs of the residents do not match or document the ISP requirements.
- On 3-25-24, during the medication pass observation with staff #2, resident #1’s March 2024 medication administration record (MAR) noted resident prescribed Clonazepam (Klonopin) 0.5 mg. as needed (PRN) for anxiety, start date noted as 11-22-23.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s record did not include a psychotropic treatment plan for the prescribed Clonazepam (Klonopin).
- On 3-25-24, the menu observed posted on the safe, secure unit was “week 1” and did not include the current date of 3-25-24.
- Staff #1 and #9 acknowledged the menu posted did not reflect the current date of 3-25-24.
- On 3-25-24 during the medication pass observation with staff #4, resident #6’s Saline Nasal Spray Solution for dry nose was not available on the cart. Staff #1 assisted staff in searching for the nasal spray by checking the medication cart and the treatment cart located in the nurse’s station.
- Staff #1 acknowledge resident #6’s PRN Saline Nasal Spray was not available in the facility.
- On 3-25-24, resident #8’s ISP documented resident’s use of oxygen “continuous oxygen at bedtime only at 2 liters/m via nasal cannula”. The information noted on the “order audit report” provided to the inspector noted “Oxygen at 2 LPM”. The facility’s record did not have a physician’s order that included the delivery source.
- Staff #1 acknowledged, the physician’s order in the record did not include all the requirements for oxygen order in assisted living facilities.
- On 3-28-24, staff record review conducted with staff #1 and #8, staff #4 ‘s record did not include documentation of staff’s verification of current job description. Interview with staff #8, staff stated, staff #4 is sent an electronic reminder every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The staff’s date of hire noted as 2-5-24.
- Staff #1 stated it is the role of Human Resources and Education to ensure all staff documentation is completed.
- Staff #1 acknowledged staff #4’s record did not include documentation of staff’s verification of job description.
December 12, 2023Complaint survey
- On 12-12-23, during a complaint inspection, resident #1’s individualized service plan (ISP) provided to the inspector by staff #1 was not updated. The target date for the resident’s goals were dated 3-31-23. The resident’s progress notes documented cognitive changes for the resident. The facility’s 72-Hour Summary also documented cognitive changes. The resident’s Progress notes documented the following: (a) On 12-21-22 at 12:01, staff was assisting resident with shower, when staff observed resident removing undershirt and disposed of the shirt in the toilet and closed the lid. Staff removed the shirt from toilet. (b) On the morning of 12-24-22 at 12:06, it was noted, the resident was walking towards the entrance of the building with a coat on and only an underdress slip underneath. It was noted resident stated going out with family and that is what resident wanted to wear. Note documented several staff members tried reasoning with resident because of what resident was wearing and the extreme cold temperature. (c) On 1-3-23, resident observed attempting to go to the dining room in a cardigan and night gown and not wearing any undergarments. Staff tried to reason with staff regarding dressing appropriately for the dining room. Resident did change outfit. (d) 1-16-23 noted facility staff communicating with resident’s POA, the resident’s service plan and level of care reviewed via telephone. The note indicated, due to continued and steady cognitive decline, resident is requiring more care needs to be meet by staff. Level of care was increased to a 83 for this reason. POA voiced understanding and also stated noticing the cognitive decline. (e) On 2-6-23 at 11: 53, resident observed attempting to enter the dining room in a bathrobe and night gown, redirected to go back upstairs to dress appropriately. (f) On 6-1-23, staff contacted family member to discuss staff concerns, resident refusing to wear or change briefs and not wanting to dirty laundry or linens to be washed, voice message left. (g) On 7-31-23 at 06:18, staff documented resident came to nurse’s station at 0030 and was confused about time and making remarks that did not make sense. Resident came again at 03:15, when asked, resident denied having trouble sleeping. Resident stated wanting to go downstairs and see “how it is outside”. Resident returned to 10 minutes later but did not sleep and was awake. (h) 9-6-23, staff noted, resident confused but calm and cooperative. (i) 9-9-23 staff noted, resident showing more signs of confusion or not comprehending; did not remember that resident usually get a croissant for breakfast daily and eats in room. (j) 9-13-23, resident did not know what resident’s key was or how to use; resident seems more confused than normal. (k) On 9-16-23 at 06:32, staff noted resident showing increased confusion, came to nurse’s station three times asking the same question. Resident also wandering around unconvinced about the time of day; went to check if breakfast was being served at 23:30. (l) On 9-16-23 at 18:58, staff documented, resident dementia is worsening. Resident is not eating; staff in the dining room report having to cue resident to eat. Resident takes one bit than voice being full. Resident unaware of time anymore, continuously going to the dining room asking for lunch all times of the day. (m) On 9-24-23, resident not aware of bowel movement in brief, resident changed by staff and assisted with night clothes and prepare for bed. (n) On 10-1-23 staff noted resident required extensive encouragement for all 3 meals; drank small amount of boost and ate small bites of meals.
September 21, 2023Inspection
- On 9-21-23, resident #1’s physical examination record was dated 1-10-23. The record noted the resident’s date of admission was 2-15-23.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the resident’s physical examination was older than 30 days and no other notation from the medical individual who signed and dated the physical examination.
- On 9-21-23, resident #1’s uniformed assessment instrument (UAI) dated 2-1-23 noted bathing need assessed as mechanical help/human help/physical assistance. The individualized service plan (ISP) noted initial assessment mechanical help/physical assistance on 2-1-23. The ISP also noted bathing need revision on 7-13-23. The bathing need was revised to mechanical help and human supervision. Dressing need assessed as human help/physical assistance. The ISP noted initial help- physical assistance on 2-1-23. The ISP noted on 3-27-23, dressing need revised to human supervision. Eating/Feed assessed as no help needed. The ISP noted resident has diet restrictions needs and does need help. The help needed is not documented. The resident’s clinical notes/progress notes provided by staff #4 on 9-21-23 noted the resident receiving mental health services. This info was not documented on the resident’s ISP.
- Staff #2 acknowledged all assessed needs for the resident was not documented on the resident’s ISP.
- On 9-1-23, the licensing inspector received an incident report for resident #1. The initial report noted a negative interaction between resident #1 and staff #4 occurred on 8-13-23. The final report noted the administrator was informed on the incident on 8-17-23 of the incident.
- On 9-21-23, staff #1 acknowledged not reporting the incident to the licensing office within 24 hours.
April 3, 2023Inspection
- On 4-3-23, resident #9’s record did not contain a sex offender screening document.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the aforementioned resident’s record did not have a sex offender screening.
- On 4-3-23, resident #2’s personal and social information data form did not include the resident’s allergy, Amoxicillin and dust mite. The resident’s physical examination document dated 8-5-21 noted resident’s allergy.
- On 4-3-23, staff #1 acknowledged the aforementioned resident’s record did not include updated and/or completed personal social data information.
- On 4-3-23, resident #1’s ISP dated 12-6-22 did not document who would provide services, frequency and where for bathing assessed need of mechanical help/supervision, dressing assessed as human help/supervision, behavior patterns assessed weekly or more and orientation assessed as disoriented some spheres all of the time (spheres: time, place, situation). Stairclimbing assessed as mechanical/human help needed, mechanical item and goal or is not documented. The resident’s date of admission noted as 12-6-22.
- On 4-4-23, resident #3’s uniform assessment instrument (UAI) dated 3-7-23 documented resident behavior as appropriate. The ISP dated 3-29-23 documented the resident has “serious cognitive impairment…Resident is (an Elopement Risk/unable to exit with one command in an emergency). Falls need did not document when, where and who would provide services to prevent major injury from falls. Wheeling documented as no help needed/ the ISP documented wheeling not performed. Resident observed on 4-3-23 walking and able to use if wheelchair if needed to. Bathing assessed as mechanical help/supervision on the UAI, dated 3-7-23. The ISP documented resident requires mechanical and physical human help, no documentation of who when and where services will be provided. Mobility assessed as mechanical and physical human help. The ISP did not document who, when and where services to be provided and did not document what mechanical help was needed. Stairclimbing assessed as mechanical/human help-physical and disoriented some spheres some time (time), these needs are not addressed on the ISP. Resident’s date of admission noted as 3-29-23.
- On 4-3-23 and 4-4-23, staff #1 acknowledged the aforementioned residents’ ISP did not include all assessed needs.
- On 4-3-23, resident #2’s ISP dated 8-13-22, documented stairclimbing assessed as mechanical help/human supervision, the ISP did not document who, when or where services would be provided. Laundry services assessed as help need, who and when services were to be provided not documented. The resident’s date of admission noted as 8-3-21.
- On 4-4-23, resident #10 had an identified need for physical therapy evaluation on 2-22-23 based on the facility’s fall risk screening. The facility obtained a verbal order for skilled physical therapy 2-3 times a week for 30 days on 3-16-23. The resident was not evaluated for physical therapy until 4-3-23 and physical therapy was not updated on the resident’s ISP until 4-4-23. The ISP did not contain a written description of the services to be provided to address the need and who will provide them, where the services will be provided, the expected outcome and the time frame for expected outcome. The resident’s ISP did not document what type of assistance was needed for eating/feeding and who would provide the services. Bathing assessed as mechanical help/ human help. The ISP did not document who would assist the resident with this assessed need. Resident #10’s ISP revised date 11-18-22 and date of admission noted as 10-4-22.
- d by the completion of the current screening form published by the Virginia Department of Health or a form consistent with it within 30 days preceding admission. Evidence:
- On 4-3-23, resident #1’s risk assessment was dated 1-12-23. The resident’s date of admission was documented as 12-6-22.
- On 4-4-23, resident #3’s record did not include documentation of a risk assessment. Resident’s date of admission documented as 3-29-23.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the aforementioned residents’ record did not have admission risk assessments per the required admissions timeframe.
- On 4-4-23, resident #3’s record did not include a signed and dated copy of the resident agreement/acknowledgement document. Staff #1 contacted the marketing office staff who stated that a resident agreement should be signed/dated. Staff #1 also spoke with the individual who signed the admissions document, that individual stated a resident agreement was not provided.
- The record included documentation of an admission (sex offender, disclosure, written assurance, physical examination, orientation, interview and resident rights, UAI and ISP).
- Staff #1 acknowledged the aforementioned resident’s record did not include a signed resident agreement for an admission to the assisted living facility. The resident was noted as a transfer resident. The resident previously resided in the independent section of the campus.
- On 4-3-23, the facility’s resident emergency practice exercises, did not have documentation of staff members on the third shift (11p- 7a) participation. Staff #8 stated the practices are not being conducted with staff on the third shift.
- Staff #1 and #8 acknowledged the resident emergency practices are not completed on all shifts.
- On 4-3-23, resident #1’s record did not have documentation of the facility’s determination and justification for the decision to place a resident in the safe, secure environment from the licensee, administrator, or designee.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the aforementioned resident’s record did not have the requirement from the facility to place resident in the safe, secure environment.
- On 4-3-23, resident #1’s record did not have documentation of the resident, guardian or legal representative, relative or independent physician (order of priority) providing approval for the resident to be place in the facility’s safe, secure unit.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the record did not have documentation of approval from the required order of priority individual.
- On 4-3-23, residents #7 and #9’s record did not contain documentation of resident’s orientation.
- Staff #1 acknowledged the aforementioned residents record did not have documentation of orientation to the facility.
- On 4-3-23 during the medication pass observation with staff #2, resident #4 had a physician’s order for Famotidine, Clotrimazole cream and Hydrocortisone cream. These medications were not available in the facility for the resident during the medication pass observation.
- Resident #6 had a physician order for Ativan and Pramoxine suppositories. These medications were not available in the facility for the resident during the medication pass observation.
- Staff #2 acknowledged the aforementioned residents’ medications, suppositories, and creams were not available on the medication cart during the medication observation.
April 5, 2022Inspection
- On 4-5-22 during a tour of the safe, secure unit with staff #10 and #11 the following items were observed in resident #5’s bathroom: hand- sanitizer, two tubes of protective ointment, shampoo and a bar of soap.
- Staff #10 and #11 acknowledged the items were in the resident’s bathroom.
- On 4-5-22 during a tour of the safe, secure unit (SCU), a type of bedrail was observed on resident #1’s bed. The resident could not demonstrate the use of the rail, but stated it was for “safety”. The resident continue to repeat the word “safety” and became agitated by the questions and want to go and complete a crossword book.
- The resident’s individualized service plan (ISP) dated side-rails were in place for positioning. The record did not include a physician’s written order nor the written consent of the legal representative for the side-rails. The ISP noted for the side-rails the staff would provide services.
- On 4-5-22 and 4-6-22 during the exit meeting, staff #1 and #2 acknowledged the facility did not have the required documents from the legal representative physician for the side-rail.
- Resident #4’s personal and social information document noted the resident as “Full Code”. The resident’s record included a “POST” document which noted resident preference as “Do Not Resuscitate”. The “POST” document was signed and date by the physician on 5-29-20. The social and personal document was not updated to reflect resident’s current status in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest.
- Resident #1’s record did not include a personal and social information document. The resident’s date of admission was documented as 7-16-21.
- Resident #3’s record did not include a personal and social information document. The resident’s date of admission was documented as 12-10-20.
- Resident #5’s record did not include a personal and social information document. The resident’s date of admission was documented as 2-15-22.
- Resident #6’s record did not include a personal and social information document. The resident’s date of admission was documented as 1-31-22.
- On 4-5-22 and 4-6-22 during the exit meeting, staff #1 and #2 acknowledged the aforementioned residents’ record did not include the personal and social data information and resident #4’s social data form was not updated to reflect DNR status.
- Resident #3’s April 2022 medication administration record (MAR) documented resident prescribed Lorazepam. The treatment plan dated 1-27-22 did not include this include this psychotropic medication.
- Resident #4’s April 2022 MAR documented resident prescribed Haldol and Xanax. The treatment plan dated 2-18-22 did not include these psychotropic medications.
- Resident #5’s February 2022 MAR documented resident prescribed Seroquel and Lorazepam. The treatment plan dated 4-5-22 did not include these psychotropic medications.
- Resident #7’s February 2022 MAR documented resident prescribed Lorazepam. The treatment plan dated 1-27-22 did not include this psychotropic medication.
- On 4-5-22 and 4-6-22 during the exit meeting, staff #1 and #2 acknowledged the aforementioned residents’ psychotropic treatment plans did not include all psychotropic medications.
- On 4-5-22 during the medication pass observation with staff #3, resident #3’s Epipen’s label noted the pen was to be discarded 3-31-22. The Epipen remained on the cart until the inspector inquired about expired items on the medication cart.
- Staff # 3 acknowledged the Epipen had expired and was on the medication cart on 4-5-22 during the medication observation.
- Resident #4’s record documented hospice services, dated 3-9-22 was being provided. The individualized service plan (ISP) dated 3-14-22 did not include what hospice services were provided. The ISP also documented psychological services but did not include who and when psychological services were being provided.
- Resident #6’s uniformed assessment instrument (UAI) dated 9-24-21 documented dressing need assessed as physical assistance. The ISP dated 9-26-21 did not document the type of assistance needed.
- On 4-5-22 and 4-6-22, staff #1 and #2 acknowledged the aforementioned residents’ ISP did not include all assessed needs.
May 21, 2021Inspection
- Resident #1’s uniformed assessment instrument (UAI) documented a reassessment date of 1-8-21 did not include the name, signature and date of the individual who completed the assessment and who reviewed the assessment.
- A review of other UAIs submitted were completed as required.
- On 5-27-21 and 6-2-21, staff #1 and #2 acknowledged the UAI was not complete as required.
- Resident #1’s nutrition report dated 2-26-21 documented resident received Boost as desired at least twice a day. On 5- ?s ut t o epo t dated docu e ted es de t ece ed oost as des ed at east t ce a day. O 5 27-21, staff #1, #2, and #5, acknowledged information documented in nutrition report regarding resident receiving Boost.
- Staff #2 stated resident’s family supplied Boost for resident. Staff also stated resident received Boost intermittently.
- On 5-27-21, the inspector requested from staff #1 and #2 the physician’s order for the Boost.
- On 5-31-21, during the inspector’s interview with staff #6, staff stated resident did receive Boost. When asked if there was an order for the Boost, staff stated searching the resident’s record but was not able to locate a physician’s order for the Boost.
- Staff #1 and #2 acknowledged during the final exit on 6-2-21, the facility did not have a physician’s order for Boost for resident #1.
September 29, 2020Inspection
- During the remote monitoring inspection, a review of resident #1's record, the uniformed assessment instrument (uai) dated 3-18-20 noted eating/feeding was not a need; however, a review of the individualized service plan (ISP) dated 3-18- 20 noted meal preferences indicated resident #1 needed "cueing, reminder to meals, need encouragement at mealtime for nutrition. Further review of the uai noted mobility need: mechanical help/human help/supervision, however, the ISP noted "cues/ coaxing to go outside, no mechanical help noted.
- A review of resident #2's recent uai dated 9-28-20 noted, mechanical help need, however, the ISP dated 9-28-20 noted resident did not need help and was not documented as a need on the ISP. Further review of the ISP noted resident's diet needs indicated no restrictions, however, resident #2's physical examination dated 8-29-20 noted soft food and no excess sugar. A review of the resident's signed physician's order dated 9-14-20 noted a "NAS/RCS" diet. This assessed need was not included on resident #2's recent ISP dated 9-28-20 presented for review during the monitoring inspection.
- A review of resident #4's uai dated 4-7-20 indicated toileting need assessed as mechanical help/human help/supervision, however, the ISP dated 4-7-20 noted “bedside toilet” and resident providing services; supervision assessment not documented on ISP. Stairclimbing need assessed as mechanical help/human help/supervision, however, the ISP noted handrail services and staff to provide services. The ISP dated 4-7-20 provided for inspector's review did not include what type of supervision help was needed. Further review of the uai also noted resident #2's need for assistance with instrumental activities of daily living (iadls): meal preparation, money and housekeeping, however, these iadls needs were not care planned as to who would provide services, where, when, and what services were provided. Another iadl- laundry need was assessed, however, the ISP did not include who, when and where the services would be provided. Also a review of resident #4's ISP noted no diet restrictions, however, resident #4's physical examination dated 4-7-20 noted NAS (no added salt) diet need.
- Staff #1 and #2 acknowledged the resident's ISP did not include all assessed needs for resident's records reviewed during the monitoring inspection on 10-7-20 during the exit interview.