10
Inspections on file
12
Deficiencies cited
6
Visits with none
0
Substandard care
0
Immediate jeopardy

The most recent inspection on file for Ohio Living Rockynol took place on October 9, 2025. Across the 10 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 12 deficiencies.

A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.

This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 10 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 4; for the other 6 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 6 of which found none.

Facility Details

Ohio license number
#1280R
County
Summit
Administrator
Thomas Durbin
Phone
(330) 867-2150
Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation

Inspections

10 on file · 12 deficiencies
October 9, 2025Licensure survey4 deficiencies
R-0313Annual health assessment contentOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete an annual fall risk assessment. This affected one resident (#34) of five residents reviewed for annual health assessments. The facility census was 57.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed admission to facility on 07/16/24 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, high blood pressure, and osteoporosis. Further review revealed Resident #34 had an initial functional assessment completed by the facility on 07/16/24 which included a fall risk assessment. The initial fall risk assessment completed on 07/16/24 indicated that Resident #34 was a low fall risk.

Review of the medical record further revealed no other fall risk assessments completed until 10/01/25. The medical record indicated that Resident #34 had fallen at the facility on 07/21/25, 09/02/25, and again on 09/24/25. There were no post fall assessments completed after each fall that occurred. There were no interventions added to the service plan following the 07/21/25 fall. Further record review indicated on 08/17/25 interventions for fall risk were added to service plan to include, Resident to call for assistance with transfers

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0338Administered meds - MD ordersOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to obtain authorized prescriber signatures on verbal and telephone orders within 14 days for residents. This affected two (#64, #65) of five residents reviewed for signing orders timely. The facility census was 57.

Findings include:

1. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed admission to facility on 09/10/24 with diagnoses including early onset of Alzheimer's Disease, vitamin D deficiency, asthma, and osteoarthritis. On 08/13/25 diagnoses were updated to include severe dementia (impaired mental status with forgetfulness) with agitation.

Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed the following orders:

On 09/10/25 an order to discontinue Aricept (medication used for memory) 10 milligrams (mg) was entered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #22 as written order received by the Medical Doctor (MD) but there was no corresponding written order available to match.

On 04/16/25 an order to discontinue Seroquel (medication for psychotic behaviors and agitation) 25 mg twice a day was entered by Registered Nurse (RN) #23 as written order with no provider listed with no written/signed order to match.

On 02/11/25 an order to discontinue Seroquel 50 mg twice a day was entered by LPN #21 as written order from the nurse practitioner but unable to produce written order to match.

On 01/29/25 an order to start Ativan/Benadryl/Haldol (ABH) Gel (medication used for agitation) 0.5/25/1 mg topically every 12 hours as needed to area of choice was entered by by LPN #21 as written by Mind Care nurse practioner, no name provided. There was no written/signed order or to match.

Interview on 10/09/25 at 3:00 P.M. with the Assisted Living Director, LPN #20 revealed she could not find the matching orders signed by a authorized prescriber for the orders dated 09/10/25, 04/16/25, 02/11/25, or 01/29/25.

2. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed admission to facility on 12/02/24 with diagnoses of dementia (mental impairment leading to forgetfulness). Further record review revealed an order dated 06/24/25 to discontinue dextromethorphan-guaifenesin syrup: 10-100 mg/5 milliliters (ml) administer 20 ml four times a day entered by LPN #24 as a telephone order from the MD. The order was not signed.

Interview on 10/09/25 at 3:00 P.M. with the Assisted Living Director, LPN #20 revealed verification of order not being signed by the MD with in 14 days.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0344Prescribed meds kept in locked storageOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation of medication carts and interview with staff the facility failed to properly store medications. This had the potential to affect 37 residents that utilize Medication Carts #01 and #03. The facility census was 57.

Findings Include:

Observation on 10/09/25 at 8:45 A.M. revealed Medication Cart #01 assigned to the first floor contained in the bottom drawer an open box of Lidocaine 4% Patches (topical pain relief medication). The contents of the box revealed silver packages containing the patches with no written information on the packages. Observation further revealed there was no expiration date on the box nor the individual packages. There was no resident identifier information or pharmacy label present on the box or individual packages.

Interview on 10/09/25 at 8:45 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #25 revealed she did not know which resident the Lidocaine patches belonged to. LPN #25 confirmed there was no expiration date or pharmacy label present on the box or individual packages in the box. LPN #25 removed the box of Lidocaine patches from the medication cart for disposal.

Observation on 10/09/25 at 8:55 A.M. revealed Medication Cart #03 assigned to the third floor had a stock bottle of Ibuprofen (medication to treat fever/pain) 200 milligrams (mg) tablets with manufacturer's expiration date of 08/2025 on the bottle.

Interview on 10/09/25 at 8:55 A.M. with LPN #22 revealed confirmation of the expiration date of 08/2025 on the bottle of Ibuprofen. LPN #22 removed the bottle from the medication cart for disposal.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0677Storage of poisons and hazardous materialsOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation on the memory care unit and staff interview the facility failed to keep chemicals in a locked storage area. This had the potential to affect 14 cognitively impaired residents, (#27, #29, #38, #40, #51, #52, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #68, #69, and #70) residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 57.

Findings Include:

Observation on 10/08/25 at 10:06 A.M. revealed the nurses' charting area by the common area on the memory care unit with unlocked cabinets. The area was open with no door or gated devices connecting the two areas. The cabinets contained two bottles of regular nail polish remover, one bottle of hydrogen peroxide, and one package of Tandill Laundry detergent pacs.

Interview on 10/08/25 at 10:06 A.M. interview with the Director of Environmental Services (DES) #26 revealed verification that the cabinets did not lock and should be locked if there are chemicals present. DES #26 verified there were two bottles of regular nail polish remover, one bottle of hydrogen peroxide, and one package of Tandill Laundry detergent pacs. The Assisted Living Director, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20 was notified and she removed the chemical products from the cabinet. LPN #20 verified that the first floor (memory care)was a locked unit and all residents residing on unit had cognitive (mental) impairments.

Observation 10/08/25 at 10:08 A.M. revealed the soiled utility room on the memory care unit locked with a key pad device. The code to unlock the key pad was taped on the key pad for easy entry. Inside of the soiled utility room was a half empty bottle of bleach and 1 spray bottle of Big Shot all purpose cleaner.

Interview on 10/08/25 at 10:09 A.M. with Personal Care Aide (PCA) #27 revealed verification of the key pad code taped on the key pad and easily visible. PCA #27 promptly removed the taped code from the key pad.

Interview on 10/08/25 at 10:09 A.M. with DES #26 revealed verification of code taped to key pad of soiled utility room and the presence of chemicals including bleach and multipurpose cleaner in the soiled utility room.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
September 9, 2025Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0339Administered meds - given only to and as prescribedOhio citation · correction confirmed 10/09/2025
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were given per physicians order. This affected one (#500) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 56.

Findings Include:

Review of Resident #500's medical record revealed the resident had a most recent admission to the facility on 03/28/25 with diagnoses including dementia and atrial fibrillation.

Review of the most recent functional assessment completed on 04/07/25 revealed Resident #500 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from one staff member to complete activities of daily living (ADLs).

Review of Resident #500's physician orders revealed the resident was ordered a medication to help the heart beat at a normal rhythm, sotalol tablet, 120 milligrams (mg) twice daily orally on 03/27/24. Further review of the sotalol order revealed no ordered parameters or other instructions for withholding the medication.

Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for April 2025 revealed Resident #500's sotalol was held on 04/06/25 and 04/11/25 with no documentation of the reason for holding the medication.

Review of a nursing progress note dated 04/06/25 at 7:45 A.M. revealed Resident #500's sotalol was held due to low blood pressure. Further review of the medical record provided no evidence or reasoning for not administering Resident #500's sotalol on 04/11/25.

Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/09/25 at 1:45 P.M. verified there was no documentation in the medical record supporting the withholding of Resident #500's sotalol on 04/06/25 and 04/11/25.

Review of the policy titled, Medication Administration

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
August 20, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
August 2, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
January 24, 2025Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0712Adequate and appropriate treatment and careOhio citation · correction confirmed 04/30/2025
What the surveyor found

Based on closed medical record review, review of hospital records, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate and timely care and medical intervention for Resident #55. This affected one resident (#55) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 58.

Actual harm occurred beginning on 06/25/24 at 1:07 A.M. when Resident #55 was found on the floor next to her bed after two previous falls within the previous 24 hours (06/24/24 at 3:33 A.M. and 06/24/24 at 6:44 A.M.) and the physician and/or certified nurse practitioner (CNP) were not notified. On 06/25/24 at 1:48 A.M. the neurological checks which were initiated for suspected head injury as a result of the falls indicated a change in condition including unclear speech with slurred and mumbled words and weakness and no action was taken. No neurological checks were documented again until 06/25/24 at 11:30 A.M. which indicated Resident #55's speech was clear, lower extremities were weak, and edema and bruising were noted around Resident #55's left eye. Again, no further action was taken including notification of the physician or certified nurse practitioner (CNP) until 06/25/24 at 1:00 P.M. when the family arrived and questioned Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 regarding extensive bruising, swollen eye and Resident #55's weakness. A neurological check on 06/25/24 at 1:00 P.M. revealed Resident #55's left eye was swollen shut and bilateral extremities were weak. LPN #100 told the family Resident #55 could be transferred to the emergency room; however, the family decided to take Resident #55 to a previously scheduled appointment with the resident's neurosurgeon. At the appointment the neurosurgeon encouraged Resident #55 to go to the emergency room given the extensive bruising after the fall. On 06/25/24 at 3:56 P.M. a family member notified the facility Resident #55 was taken to the emergency room and was being admitted to the hospital for overnight observation. On 06/28/24 at 10:28 A.M. the hospital called an update to the facility. Resident #55 was not doing well and was placed on hospice and was sent to a hospice center.

Findings include:

Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on 06/21/24 and discharged 06/25/24 with diagnoses that included fusion of cervical spine, hypertension, osteoporosis, syncope and collapse, delirium, and insomnia.

Review of the Assisted Living Admission Health and Functional Observation form dated 06/21/24 revealed Resident #55's decision making/cognitive functioning skills were reasonable and speech was clear. A Mini Mental State Exam dated 06/21/24 revealed Resident #55 had severe cognitive impairment.

Review of a progress note dated 06/24/24 timed 3:33 A.M. revealed Resident #55 was found on the floor. Resident #55 stated she had rolled out of bed. Resident #55 denied hitting her head and denied any pain. There was no written evidence the resident's physician or CNP was notified at this time.

Review of a progress note dated 06/24/24 timed 6:44 A.M. revealed Resident #55 was found on the floor. Resident #55 stated she heard a car. The note revealed Resident #55 denied any pain and was assisted to the toilet. While toileting Resident #55, a bump was observed to the posterior left side of Resident #55's head and a small bruise was noted to Resident #55's left shoulder. There was no written evidence the resident's physician or CNP was notified at this time.

Review of a neurological check dated 06/24/24 timed 6:50 A.M. revealed Resident #55's speech was clear and upper and lower extremities had strong movement.

Review of a progress note dated 06/24/24 timed 10:04 A.M. revealed the CNP was notified Resident #55 had two falls, had a bruise on the left shoulder and neurological checks were started. The documentation did not reveal the CNP was notified about the bump to the posterior left side of Resident #55's head.

Review of a progress note dated 06/25/24 timed 1:07 A.M. revealed Resident #55 was found lying flat on the floor next to the bed. Resident #55 could not say what happened. Resident #55 had an abrasion to the left inner knee. The abrasion was cleansed with normal saline and a bandage was applied. There was no written evidence the resident's physician or CNP was notified at this time.

Review of a neurological checks revealed on 06/25/24 at 1:48 A.M. Resident #55's speech was unclear with slurred and mumbled words and Resident #55 was weak. There was no written evidence the resident's physician or CNP was notified at this time or that the resident was transferred to the hospital for further assessment, evaluation or care following the repeated falls and identified change in condition (mumbled words and weakness).

No neurological checks were documented again until 06/25/24 at 11:30 A.M. The neurological check dated 06/25/24 at 11:30 A.M. revealed Resident #55's speech was clear, lower extremities were weak, and edema and bruising were noted around Resident #55's left eye. The neurological check completed on 06/25/24 at 1:00 P.M. revealed Resident #55's left eye was swollen shut and bilateral extremities were weak. There was no written evidence the resident's physician or CNP was notified at this time or that the resident was transferred to the hospital for further assessment, evaluation or care.

Review of a progress note dated 06/25/24 timed 1:00 P.M. revealed LPN #100 was called into Resident #55's room by the resident's daughter. Resident #55's eye was completely swollen shut with bruising noted around the eye and down the left side of Resident #55's face and neck. LPN #100 assisted Resident #55's daughter with transferring Resident #55 from a chair to wheelchair. Resident #55 was very tired, weak, and required a lot of assistance with the transfer. The note indicated LPN #100 suggested Resident #55 could be taken to the emergency department for evaluation due to Resident #55's current condition. The family decided to take Resident #55 to a scheduled neurosurgeon appointment stating it would be quicker, and the neurosurgeon could decide if Resident #55 needed to go to the hospital.

Review of a progress note dated 06/25/24 timed 2:15 P.M. revealed the CNP was updated Resident #55's condition had gotten worse. Resident #55's left eye was swollen shut with bruising around the left eye and down the side of the resident's face and neck. The CNP was notified Resident #55's family had transported Resident #55 to a neurosurgeon appointment and would let the neurosurgeon decide if Resident #55 should be sent to the emergency department.

Review of a progress note dated 06/25/24 timed 3:56 P.M. revealed a family member reported Resident #55 was taken to the emergency department and admitted for overnight observation. A progress note dated 06/28/24 at 10:28 A.M. revealed the hospital called an update to the facility. Resident #55 was not doing well. Resident #55 was placed on hospice and was sent to a hospice center and would not be returning to the facility.

Review of the hospital records dated 06/25/24 revealed Resident #55 had a past medical history of hypertension, urinary tract infection, and syncope and presented to the hospital with multiple falls in the past few weeks with head trauma. Resident #55 was at a follow up appointment on 06/25/24 when the physician encouraged Resident #55 to go to the emergency department for evaluation given extensive bruising after fall. Resident #55 reportedly had four falls over the past few days. Resident #55 was not on any oral anticoagulation.

An interview on 01/17/25 at 9:13 A.M. with the daughter of Resident #55 revealed when the family arrived at the facility to take Resident #55 to a scheduled appointment with neurosurgeon in June 2024, they discovered Resident #55's left eye was swollen closed and Resident #55 had extensive bruising to her face. The nurse stated they could transfer Resident #55 to the hospital if the family wanted. The resident's daughter stated the nurse did not seem concerned, so the family decided to take Resident #55 to the neurosurgeon. The daughter stated she felt the neurosurgeon would be more qualified to assess Resident #55 because of the head injury. When Resident #55 arrived at the neurosurgeon appointment, the neurosurgeon called an ambulance due to the terrible bruising and head trauma.

Interview on 01/17/25 at 2:16 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 revealed she received report the morning of 06/25/24 that Resident #55 had a fall. Neurological checks were done and LPN #100 kept Resident #55 within sight during her shift. The LPN stated Resident #55 did not have bruising at first and the bruising just appeared all of the sudden. LPN #100 stated she offered to send Resident #55 to the hospital after Resident #55's family arrived, and the bruising showed up. LPN #100 verified she had documented edema and bruising to Resident #55's eye and weakness to bilateral lower extremities on 06/25/24 at 11:30 A.M. (prior to the daughter's arrival). LPN #100 verified the CNP was not notified when LPN #100 noticed the edema and bruising at 11:30 A.M. or that Resident #55 had another fall the morning of 06/25/24. LPN #100 stated her shift started at 7:00 A.M. and verified she did not complete any neurological checks until 11:30 A.M. LPN #100 indicated she could not recall how much time had gone by since Resident #55 was within her sight and Resident #55's family called LPN #100 to the room to assess Resident #55 because of the bruising to Resident #55's face and her left eye being swollen shut.

Interview on 01/17/25 at 2:29 P.M. with Assisted Living Manager #101 revealed Resident #55 had light bruising when LPN #100 started her shift and the bruising worsened during the day. Assisted Living Manager #101 verified there was no documentation of the monitoring of the bump to Resident #55's head or the bruise to Resident #55's left shoulder after the assessment on 06/24/24 at 6:44 A.M. Assisted Living Manager #101 also verified documentation did not reveal neurological checks being completed every two hours, detailed information about how Resident #55 was lying (face up/face down/etc) after the falls on 06/24/24 at 6:44 A.M. and 06/25/24 at 1:07 A.M. when injuries were noted, and the CNP was not notified of changes discovered during neurological checks. A neurological check on 06/25/24 at 1:48 A.M. revealed changes in Resident #55's speech and weakness in lower extremities. Assisted Living Manager #101 verified there were no further neurological checks until 06/25/24 at 11:30 A.M.

During an interview on 01/21/25 at 2:15 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) verified neurological checks were not completed on 06/24/24 at 9:00 P.M. or 11:00 P.M. The DON also verified an agency nurse was working on 06/25/24 at 1:07 A.M. when Resident #55 had a fall and the agency nurse did not complete a fall event (incident report).

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00160530.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
June 20, 2024Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
May 11, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
July 11, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
March 3, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
December 5, 2022Licensure survey6 deficiencies
R-0122Physical exams for staffOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/20/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a physical examination completed for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #506 before their first day worked. This had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.

Findings include:

Review of the personnel file for STNA #506 revealed a first day worked as 12/02/22.

Review of physical examination for STNA #506 revealed no physician or nurse practitioner signature.

Interview on 12/05/22 at 2:00 P.M. with Human Resources #502 confirmed that STNA #506's physical assessment had not been reviewed or signed off by a physician or nurse practitioner. She reported all staff upon hire complete a questionnaire about their health and then the nurse practitioner reviews them later and signs them off.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0345Labeling of medicationsOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/20/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed properly and safely store medication for Resident #34. This affected one of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 12/07/18. Diagnoses included hypothyroidism, type two diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder.

Observation of medication administration on 12/05/22 at 8:20 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #500 revealed her filling medication for Resident #34 into a medication cup. LPN #500 then went to Resident #34's room to administer the medication and he was not in his room. LPN #500 then placed the medication cup on top of her medication cart and began to fill another medication cup for a different resident, Resident #33. LPN #500 then wrote Resident #34's room number on his medication cup and placed it in the top drawer of the medication cart, locked the cart and went to administer Resident #33's medications. When LPN #500 arrived at Resident #33's room she was not available. LPN #500 then went back to the medication cart, opened it, and removed the medication cup labeled with Resident #34's room number. The medication cup had no lid or covering over it. Interview during this observation with LPN #500 confirmed she was not able to identify all the medications in the cup or if they were all the same pills she had placed earlier. LPN #500 then took the elevator and went to the second-floor dining room and administered Resident #33 the medication from the unlabeled medication cup and then she administered the medications to Resident #34 labeled with his room number.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0347Use/order/dispense/administer/dispose of controlled substancesOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/20/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of narcotic medication for Resident #55. This affected one of seven residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 01/02/20 and a discharge date of 11/27/22. Diagnoses included cerebral atherosclerosis, atrial ventricular block, and hypertension.

Review of physician's order dated 09/02/21 for Resident #55 revealed morphine sulphate (a narcotic pain medication) 20 milligrams (mg) per milliliters (ml), was ordered at 10 mg/0.5 ml every one hour for pain or dyspnea (shortness of breath).

Review of physician's order for Resident #55 dated 09/08/21 revealed morphine sulphate 20 mg/ml was changed to 5 mg/0.25 ml every one hour for pain or dyspnea.

Review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) #229021 revealed on 11/09/22 the Director was notified by nursing staff that Resident #55's morphine sulfate was a lighter color then it normally had been. The pharmacy was notified, and the pharmacist confirmed the color change and indicated it was likely that someone had tampered with this medication. The SRI indicated facility nursing staff were drug tested and the local police were notified.

Review of facility investigation for this SRI revealed no staff witness statements were documented and no interviews or observations of similar residents were documented.

Interview on 12/05/22 at 9:34 A.M. with the Director confirmed Resident #55's morphine sulfate medication was tampered with and the bottle was replaced by pharmacy for this reason and the SRI was substantiated. The Director confirmed she had no documentation of any staff interviews and no documentation of interviews/observations of other residents in the facility who received narcotic pain medications to identify any additional concerns. The Director said Resident #55 was assessed for potential complications, but no documentation was available. The Director said the police were called but they did not file a report because the officer told her even if a nurse was positive for drugs in their system there is no way to prove it was Resident #55's morphine sulfate.

Review of facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation and Crime Reporting

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0362Accounting of held resident funds, written authorizationOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/20/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have financial authorization forms witnessed for Residents #11 and #15. This affected two of five residents reviewed for authorization forms for managing resident funds. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/23/22. Diagnoses included asthma, diverticulosis, and Alzheimer's disease.

Review of personal use fund authorization for Resident #11 signed by her power of attorney on 11/08/22 revealed no witness signature.

Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 08/29/22. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, hyperkalemia, and chronic kidney disease.

Review of personal use fund authorization form for Resident #15 signed by his power of attorney on 05/20/22 revealed no witness signature.

Interview on 12/05/22 at 3:30 P.M. with Business Manager #508 revealed she did not get witness signatures on those forms because someone told her if a resident's power of attorney signed the form then a witness signature was not required.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0392Establish/implement written infection control P/P; infection prevention and control program and designee requirementsOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/20/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the glucometer, a blood sugar testing device, was properly cleaned/disinfected. This affected Residents #10 and #18 who had physician ordered blood sugar checks and resided on the second floor. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

Observation on 12/05/22 at 8:20 A.M. of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #500 revealed her exiting Resident #10's room with a glucometer, a blood sugar testing device, in her hand. She returned to the medication cart, removed the used test strip with blood, and immediately placed the glucometer in the top drawer of the medication cart. LPN #500 then took the elevator to the third floor to pass medications. Interview after this observation with LPN #500 confirmed she did not properly clean and disinfect the glucometer before placing it back in the medication cart for the second floor residents.

The facility indicated there were two residents residing on the second floor who had physician ordered blood sugar testing using the glucometer, Resident #10 and Resident #18.

Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 02/23/21. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus. Resident #10 had a physician's order dated 11/01/22 to have a fasting blood sugar check completed daily.

Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 04/18/22. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus. Resident #18 had a current physician order to have blood sugar checks completed twice daily. Nursing staff were to call the physician if the blood sugar was less than 90 or greater then 400.

Review of the facility policy titled, Glucometer Cleaning, last reviewed 04/22/21, revealed glucometers were shared by multiple patients and were to be thoroughly wiped with an approved disinfectant and allowed to air dry after every use and between every patient per recommendation of disinfectant.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0400Shared adult day care must be in compliance with ruleOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/20/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all employees employed greater than a year were assessed/screened for tuberculosis. This affected three of five employee files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 54 residents residing in the facility.

Findings include:

Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #503 revealed a first day worked as 05/24/21. Review of the file revealed no annual tuberculosis screening or testing documented.

Review of the personnel file for LPN #504 revealed a first day worked as 07/19/07. Review of the file revealed no annual tuberculosis screening or testing documented.

Review of the personnel file for State Tested Nursing Assistant #507 revealed a first day worked as 02/21/20. Review of the file revealed no annual tuberculosis screening or testing documented.

Interview on 12/05/22 at 2:00 P.M. with Human Resources #502 confirmed there was no documentation to verify these staff members were assessed/screened or retested for tuberculosis annually.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules

Resident Satisfaction

2025-2026 survey

Ohio interviews residents directly and publishes the results by area. Scores run from 0 to 100.

82.4Overall satisfaction score
85.5Ohio average
Below Ohio average
AreaThis facility 
Care and services87.8
Caregivers85.1
Environment92.6
Facility culture86.5
Meals and dining84.4
Moving in84.3
Spending time69.3