13
Inspections on file
20
Deficiencies cited
7
Visits with none
0
Substandard care
0
Immediate jeopardy

The most recent inspection on file for Paramount Senior Living at Polaris took place on March 31, 2026. Across the 13 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 20 deficiencies.

A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.

This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 13 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 6; for the other 7 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 7 of which found none.

Facility Details

Ohio license number
#2909R
County
Delaware
Administrator
Hannah Wantz
Director of nursing
Lori Pensis
Phone
(614) 392-2079
Ownership
For Profit - Corporation

Inspections

13 on file · 20 deficiencies
March 31, 2026Licensure survey7 deficiencies
R-0342Comply with Board of Pharmacy and DEA regulationsOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, staff interviews, review of manufacturer guidelines, review of facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of insulin pens. This affected four Residents (#16, #17, #18, and #28) of four reviewed for medication storage. The facility identified 12 residents (#16, #17, #18, #28, #34, #37, #45, #47, #55, #58, #72, and #78) with orders for insulin injectable's. The facility census was 77.

Findings include:

1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 11/27/24. Diagnoses included heart failure, cerebral infarct, diabetes and metabolic encephalopathy.

Review of physician orders revealed orders dated 11/27/24 for Humalog kwikpen injection with instructions to inject subcutaneously before meals per sliding scale with instructions for blood sugar of 141 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) to 180 mg/dL give one unit, 181 to 220 mg/dL give two units, 221 to 260 mg/dL give three units, 261 to 300 mg/dL give four units, 301 to 340 mg/dL give five units, 341 to 380 mg/dL give six units and greater that 381 mg/dL give seven units. Additionally, there was an order for Humalog kwikpen injection with instructions to inject subcutaneously at bedtime per sliding scale for blood sugar of 251 to 300 mg/dL give one unit, 301 to 340 mg/dL give two units, 341 to 380 mg/dL give three units, and greater that 381 mg/dL give four units. The resident was also ordered Humalog kwikpen injection with instructions to inject three units subcutaneously before meals and Lantus solos injection with instructions to inject five units subcutaneously in the morning with instructions to not mix with other insulin's and discard 28 days after opening.

Interview and observation on 03/30/26 at 3:00 P.M. with Medication Tech #55 revealed in the medication cart, Resident #16's Humalog pen was found dated 01/29/26 with an expiration date of 02/27/26, the Lantus pen was found undated, and the Lispro was found dated 02/25/26 with an expiration date of 03/25/26. Medication Tech #55 confirmed the insulin's were considered expired and/or undated and should have been discarded.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Lantus dated 05/2025 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for 28 days then should be discarded.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Lispro dated 12/2018 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for at room temperature for 28 days then should be discarded.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Humalog dated 03/2013 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for 28 days then should be discarded even if it had insulin remaining.

2. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 07/02/23. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary disease, cognitive impairment, anxiety and diabetes.

Review of physician orders revealed orders dated 06/30/25 for ASPA (Novolog) injection flexpen with instructions to inject subcutaneously four times daily before meals and at bedtime with instructions stating if blood sugar was 151 to 200 mg/dL give three unit, 201 to 250 mg/dL give five units, 251 to 300 mg/dL give eight units, 301 to 350 mg/dL give 10 units, 351 to 400 mg/dL give 12 units, and greater that 400 mg/dL give 15 units.

Interview and observation on 03/30/26 at 3:00 P.M. with Medication Tech #55 revealed in the medication cart, Resident #17's Novolog insulin pen was undated. Medication Tech #55 confirmed the insulin was undated, it was unknown when it was opened, and should have been discarded.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Novolog dated 02/2023 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for 28 days then should be discarded even if it had insulin remaining.

3. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 08/07/25. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness and diabetes.

Review of physician orders revealed orders dated 08/07/25 to 08/08/25 for Lantus injection with instructions to inject 10 units subcutaneously in the morning. Additionally, there was a physician order dated 08/08/25 for Tresiba flex injection with instructions to inject 10 units subcutaneously in the morning and an order dated 08/08/25 for Novolog injection flexpen with instructions to inject subcutaneously before meals with instructions stating for blood sugar 151 to 200 mg/dL give two units, 201 to 250 mg/dL give four units, 251 to 300 mg/dL give six units, 301 to 350 mg/dL give eight units, and 351 to 400 mg/dL give 10 units.

Interview and observation on 03/30/26 at 3:00 P.M. with Medication Tech #55 revealed in the medication cart, Resident #18's Novolog pen was found undated, a Tresiba pen was found undated, and a Lantus pen was found to be dated 01/16/26 with expiration date of 02/16/26. Medication Tech #55 confirmed the insulin's were considered expired and/or undated and should have been discarded.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Novolog dated 02/2023 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for 28 days then should be discarded even if it had insulin remaining.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Tresiba dated 07/2022 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once needed for use the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for 56 days then should be discarded.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Lantus dated 05/2025 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for 28 days then should be discarded.

4. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 11/26/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, diabetes and multiple sclerosis.

Review of physician orders revealed orders dated 11/21/25 for Lantus solos injection with instructions to inject five units subcutaneously in the morning with instructions stating do not mix with other insulin's and discard 28 days after opening. Additional orders dated 11/26/25 revealed orders for Lispro injection with instructions to inject before meals and at bedtime if blood sugar was 151 to 200 mg/dL give two units, 201 to 250 mg/dL give four units, 251 to 300 mg/dL give six units, 301 to 350 mg/dL give eight units, 351 to 400 mg/dL give 10 units, and 401 to 500 mg/dL give 12 units.

Interview and observation on 03/30/26 at 3:00 P.M. with Medication Tech #55 revealed in the medication cart, Resident #28's Lispro and Lantus pen's were undated. Medication Tech #55 confirmed the insulin's were undated, it was unknown when they were opened, and they should have been discarded.

Interview with on 03/30/26 around 3:45 P.M. with Resident Care Manager #50 confirmed staff should be dating and labeling the insulin pens and they should be discarded once they go past expiration.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Lantus dated 05/2025 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for 28 days then should be discarded.

Review of the manufacturer guidelines for Lispro dated 12/2018 stated vials shall be stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Once opened the vial can remain outside the refrigerator for at room temperature for 28 days then should be discarded.

Review of facility policy titled, Diabetes Management dated 10/01/18 revealed all residents who were ordered blood glucose monitoring would have their own monitor, alcohol wipes, test strips and lancets. All insulin dependent diabetics would have their own supply of insulin and syringes. All insulin would be stored in the refrigerator before being opened. Once insulin pens were opened they would be dated and stored in the medication carts.

Review of facility policy titled, Pharmaceutical Services-Labeling of Medications dated 10/01/18 revealed all medications shall be maintained in the facility and properly labeled. Drug labels must be legible at all times and labels shall include date drug was dispensed and expirations date.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0509Requirements for hospice careOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure signed agreements were completed for residents receiving skilled care over 120 days. This affected two residents (#7 and #12) of two reviewed for skilled care. The facility identified six residents who had received greater than 120 days of skilled wound or tube feed care. The facility census was 77.

Findings include:

1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/13/24. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, pulmonary embolism, and pressure ulcer of an unspecified site.

Review of the wound care log dated 03/26/26 revealed Resident #12 had a wound which originated on 11/12/23 (prior to facility admission). The wound was described as a surgical wound to the left flank and was noted to be healing.

Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 03/12/25-10/10/25 for Resident #12 revealed medication Triad wound dressing paste (topical ointment ordered to assist with wound healing) with instructions apply topically Triad to the periwound (skin surrounding the wound) and any other open wounds, cover with an abdominal (abd) pad (highly absorbent dressing), change daily and as needed for soilage/detachment.

Review of physician orders for 03/12/25-10/08/25 for Resident #12 revealed an order for the resident's wounds to be cleansed with Vashe (wound cleansing solution), pat dry, apply topical Gentamycin (antibiotic) ointment to the left lateral main hip wound, apply Fibrocol (a collagen-alginate wound dressing) and alginate cut to size, cover with an abd pad, and secure with tape. The dressing was ordered to be changed daily and as needed for soilage/detachment.

Review of physician orders for 04/07/25-07/16/25 for Resident #12 revealed medication Gentamicin Ointment 0.1 % with instructions apply topically to left flank wound bed daily during wound care.

Review of the Physician Provider plan of care dated 06/09/25 revealed Residents #12's primary diagnoses included cerebral infarction and chronic wounds. The assessment indicated the resident had a wound on the left hip with chronic scarring.

Review of physician orders for 07/28/25-10/08/25 for Resident #12 revealed an order to cleanse the left hip with Vashe for 3 minutes, apply Hydrofera Blue (a highly absorptive, antibacterial dressing used to kill bacteria and manage wound drainage) and foam/silicone daily and as needed for wound care.

Review of physician orders for 10/8/25 for Resident #12 revealed an order for Prisma (a sterile collagen matrix dressing which helps to create a moist wound bed and an environment that supports wound healing), with instructions to cleanse the left hip with soap and water, pat dry, apply slightly-moistened Prisma, cover with calcium alginate and a dry dressing. The dressing was ordered to be changed daily and as needed for soilage/detachment.

Review of physician order for 01/19/26 for Resident #12 revealed an order for Chlorhexidine Gluconate Liquid 4% (commonly known as Hibiclens) with instructions to cleanse the left hip wound with soap and water, apply Prisma to wound surface, apply calcium alginate over the area, and cover dressing with abd pad with each dressing change.

Review of home health care visit notes dated 03/09/26 revealed Resident #12 was seen by home health care for ongoing wound management.

Review of physician orders for 03/17/26 for Resident #12 revealed an order for Chlorhexidine Gluconate Liquid 4% with instructions to cleanse the left hip wound with Hibiclens, apply Silver Alginate (a sterile, highly absorbent wound dressing which releases silver to kill bacteria and form a moist gel to facilitate autolytic debridement) to wound surface, cover with an abd pad or border dressing, and apply to the surrounding skin a thin layer of a 1-1-1 mixture of Terbinafine, Triamcinolone and Zinc mixture (this mixture is often used in combination to treat complex and inflamed skin infections) daily with each dressing change.

Review of Resident #12's medical record from 06/13/24 to 03/31/26 revealed the facility had no agreement for skilled care to be provided which had been signed between a home health company representative, the physician, the facility, and the resident and/or resident representative.

Interviews on 03/31/26 from 10:30 A.M. to 10:53 A.M. with Wellness Director #50 revealed the home health provider and the residents typically have a signed agreement visit note but confirmed the facility did not have an agreement for Resident #12 to receive skilled care and confirmed the resident had received skilled care for greater than 120 days. Wellness Director #50 acknowledged facility staff were not aware of the requirement for a written agreement for skilled care.

2. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 10/17/24. Diagnoses included heart failure, acute respiratory failure, cardiomyopathy, and cancer.

Review of the physician order for 10/17/24 for Resident #7 revealed an order to cleanse the resident's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube site with soap and water, apply split gauze daily (wound care) and as needed.

Review of physician order for 01/23/25 for Resident #7 revealed medication Jevity 1.5 calorie (tube feeding solution) with instructions to give 240 milliliter (ml) via peg tube four times daily. The order specified diamond does not supply.

Review of physician order for 04/10/25 for Resident #7 revealed an order for free water flushes with instructions for 120 ml of water to be administered via PEG tube four times daily.

Review of the Physician Provider plan of care dated 10/23/25 revealed Resident #7 had left-sided paralysis and a PEG tube. The physician noted the resident was ordered a mechanical soft diet and nectar thick liquids and also used Jevity 1.5 calorie solution 240 ml four times daily as a supplement. The physician indicated the resident's needs could be met in the residential care facility setting.

Review of the resident's medical record dated 10/17/24 through 03/31/26 revealed the facility had no agreement for skilled care to be provided which had been signed between physician, the facility, the resident and/or resident representative, and any outside provider if applicable.

Interviews on 03/31/26 from 10:30 A.M. to 10:53 A.M. with Wellness Director #50 revealed the facility and the residents typically have a signed agreement visit note but confirmed the facility did not have an agreement for Resident #7 to receive skilled care and confirmed the resident had received skilled care for greater than 120 days. Wellness Director #50 acknowledged facility staff were not aware of the requirement for a written agreement for skilled care.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0559Procure, store, prepare, distribute and serve foodsOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. The affected all 77 residents who received meals from the kitchen.

Findings include:

Observation on 03/30/26 at 9:30 A.M. of the facility kitchen revealed the following concerns:

a. In the freezer there were two bags of undated onion rings, an undated opened bag of tater tots, an undated bag of cheese stuffed pastries, and an undated opened bag of green beans. There was also a box with about six hamburgers, a package of chicken strips, a box of grilled chicken breasts, and three ice cream cups found to be open to air and uncovered.

b. In the refrigerator there was a large container of sour cream with a best by date of 02/25/26, four containers of vanilla yogurt with a best by date of 02/28/26, cottage cheese with a best by date of 03/09/26, a bag of five hard boiled eggs with no date, and an open pack of lettuce/salad mix with no date and it appeared brown and was a soup-like consistency. In the refrigerator was also a container of cheese and a container of lettuce that were left open to air and uncovered.

c. In the dry storage area there was an open bag of rice crispy cereal with a best by date of 01/2026 and over four bags of powdered sugar with a best by date of 01/31/26.

Interview on 03/30/26 at 9:30 A.M. with Kitchen Manager #70 confirmed the findings of foods not being dated and covered and confirmed dates on the expired food items. She stated they would be removed and thrown away.

Observation on 03/30/26 at 11:20 A.M. upon a return visit to the kitchen, the previous items identified to be improperly stored were still in place.

Review of facility policy titled, Food Storage/Dry Storage dated 06/20/17 revealed food storage areas shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All items shall be used on a first-in first-out rotation and food items shall be stored with labels facing outward with name, weight/count, and date. All open items must be dated with the date of opening and tightly covered to preserve freshness.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0563Food texture meets individual needs, except no syringe feedingsOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observations, staff interview and record review, facility failed to ensure pureed food was made to the right consistency. This had the potential to affect four residents (#7, #16, #19 and #21) who the facility identified to have orders for puree textured foods. The facility census was 77.

Findings include

Observation on 03/30/26 at 11:20 A.M. revealed Cook #80 placed four servings of already grilled Reuben sandwiches in the blender along with about a half cup of broth. She reported the sandwiches included bread, corn beef, sauerkraut, cheese and thousand island dressing. The mixture was blended and the sides were scraped with a spatula. Another half cup of broth was added and the mixture was blended again. The Cook and Kitchen Manager #70 looked at the mixture and placed it into a metal serving dish.

Observation and interview on 03/30/26 at 11:30 A.M. with Kitchen Manager #70 revealed the mixture was tasted and found to have a chunky consistency. Pieces of meat were distinguishable from the mixture. Kitchen Manager #70 confirmed the mixture should be smooth and without chunks and instructed Cook #80 to place the food back in the blender to continue mixing.

Review of facility policy titled, NDDD Dysphagia Pureed dated 01/11/22 revealed the pureed diet is a modification of the regular diet and should be the consistency of smooth, moist mashed potatoes or pudding like consistency with no coarse texture or lumps allowed.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0564Kitchen and dining areas clean and sanitary; transporting meals; garbageOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, staff interview, review of temperature logs, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the dish washing machine was working properly to clean and sanitize dishes. The affected all 77 residents who received food and beverages from the kitchen.

Findings include

Observation and interview on 03/30/26 at 9:00 A.M. of Kitchen Staff #60 revealed she was actively washing dishes. The machine had a plaque on it stating for a high temperature wash the temperatures should read minimum of 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for the wash cycle and minimum of 180 degrees F for the rinse cycle. A cycle was started and the temperature for the wash cycle was 122 degrees F and the temperature for rinse cycle was 160 degrees F. Several additional cycles were observed with temperatures for the wash cycle being 120 to 125 degrees F and 160 to 182 degrees F for the rinse cycle. Kitchen Staff #60 watched the temperatures and confirmed the temperatures showed a wash cycle of 120 degrees to 125 degrees F and a rinse cycle of 160 to 182 degrees F. She stated she was not aware of what the temperature should be and reported she was not aware of any issues with the dishwasher. During this observation, dishes were being sent through the machine at an improper temperature and were subsequently being stored on the shelves for use. She acknowledged she did not know much about the dishwasher and continued to send through more sets of dishes.

Review of the temperature logs revealed multiple missing days with the last documented on 03/28/26.

Observation and interview on 03/30/26 at 9:30 A.M. with Kitchen Manager #70 confirmed the dishwashing machine was not getting to the required temperatures. The Kitchen Manager confirmed the temperature for the wash cycle was reading 122 to 125 degrees F and the rinse cycle was reading 160 to 182 degrees F. She agreed the wash was low and the rinse was not reading the right temperatures consistently. She confirmed the dishwashing temperature log had not been completed daily and was missing entries for the past two days.

Review of facility policy titled, Dish Machine and Pot Sink Temperature and Chemical Test Log dated 06/20/17 revealed the consistent water temperature monitoring promotes good performance and ensures sanitation of dishes. The policy referenced a chemical structured dishwasher and the one in use was a high temperature structured dishwasher.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0615Fire drill requirementsOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, facility failed to ensure fire drills were completed at least once each shift every three months. Facility also failed to document alarm transmission to the monitoring company. This affected all facility residents. Facility census was 77.

Findings include

Review of facility fire drills revealed first shift drills were completed on 04/30/25 at 1:30 P.M., 07/31/25 at 2:00 P.M., 08/30/25 at 10:30 A.M., 09/26/25 at 1:50 P.M., 11/27/25 at 10:30 A.M., 12/23/25 at 10:15 A.M., 01/30/26 at 7:15 A.M., 02/26/26 at 2:15 P.M.

Review of fire drill documentation revealed second shift drills were completed on 05/29/25 at 3:20 P.M. and 10/31/25 at 4:30 P.M.

Review of fire drill documentation revealed third shift drills were completed on 03/21/25 at 5:32 A.M. and 06/20/25 at 4:45 A.M.

Review of the Fire drill documentation revealed no mention of when the alarm was transmitted and confirmed of time it was received and no documentation of any delayed transmissions for alarms completed form 9:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M.

Interview on 03/30/26 at 4:10 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #65 confirmed fire drills should be completed monthly on a rotating basis and should include one drill every shift every three months. MD reviewed the fire drills and confirmed he had eight first shift drills, two second shift drills and two third shift drills. He also confirmed on third shift drills they did silent drills and inform the monitoring company the next day. He confirmed the documentation did not state any details of the monitoring company being notified the morning after a night fire drill.

Review of facility policy titled Fire Drill Procedure dated 10/01/18 revealed facility shall have 12 unannounced fire drills once every shift every three months.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0619Written record of drills and evaluationOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, facility failed to ensure fire drill documentation included the method of activation of the alarm and staff attendance. This affected all facility residents. Facility census was 77.

Findings include:

Review of the fire drill documentation revealed no mention of when the alarm was transmitted or confirmation of the time it was received. Additionally, the fire drills contained no documentation of any delayed transmissions for alarms activated during fire drills conducted between 9:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M.

Interview on 03/30/26 at 4:10 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #65 confirmed the fire drill documentation did not include the method of activation. He also confirmed staff attendance was not documented on the fire drills completed 11/2025, 12/2025, 01/2026, and 02/2026.

Review of facility policy titled Fire Drill Procedure dated 10/01/18 revealed facility shall have 12 unannounced fire drills. Fire drill records shall include date and time, number of resident who evacuated, staff who participated, and if the alarm was activated.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
November 10, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
November 5, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
October 1, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
June 5, 2025Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0712Adequate and appropriate treatment and careOhio citation · correction confirmed 03/31/2026
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, record review, resident interviews, staff interviews and review of call light response logs, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with adequate and timely personal care. This affected two (Resident #96 and #47) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 78.

Findings include:

1. Review of Resident #96's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 05/01/25 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, retention or urine, and hypertension.

Review of Resident #96's service plan dated 05/01/25 revealed Resident #96 required one- person assist for activities of daily living (ADL's), the resident was documented to be incontinent and require staff assist every two hours for care.

Observation on 06/05/25 at 9:15 A.M., revealed Resident #96's couch cushion wet with urine.

Interview on 06/05/25 at 9:15 A.M., Resident #96 verified the couch cushion cover was taken by an aide to be washed after it had urine on it because that is where the resident sometimes slept. Resident #96 stated it needed to be washed as it had urine on it for a few days but had gotten worse since the previous night.

Interview on 06/05/25 at 2:30 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified residents should be given incontinence care and checked on every two hours or as needed.

Interview with the Executive Director (ED) and DON on 06/02/25 at 3:10 P.M. revealed the expectation for staff to answer call lights is ten minutes.

Review of the call light logs for 05/01/25 through 06/05/25 for Resident #96 revealed 68 of 144 call light response times were over ten minutes with the longest time being 55 minutes when the resident pendant was pressed at 4:17 P.M. and pendant was cleared at 5:13 P.M.

Interview on 06/05/23 at 5:30 P.M., with the ED verified the staff response to Resident #96's call light was often over the facility expected 10 minute response time.

2. Record of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 03/05/25 with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with early onset, dementia - moderate with agitation, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis.

Review of Resident #47's service plan dated on 03/05/25 revealed Resident # 47 required two-person assist, was incontinent, and requires staff assist every two hours for care.

Interview with Resident #47's Hospice Case Manager Registered Nurse # 205 on 06/05/25 at 1:17 P.M. revealed she and the hospice staff find Resident #47 saturated at least once weekly due to not having had timely incontinence care.

Interview on 06/05/25 at 2:30 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Residents should be given incontinence care and checked on every two hours or as needed.

Interview with the Executive Director (ED) and DON on 06/02/25 at 3:10 P.M. revealed the expectation for staff to answer call lights is ten minutes.

Review of call light logs for 04/05/25 through 06/02/25 for Resident #47 revealed 31 of 49 call light response times were over ten minutes with the longest time being on 57 minutes when the pendant was pressed at 8:23 A.M. and pendant was cleared at 9:20 A.M.

Interview on 06/05/23 at 5:30 P.M., with the ED verified the staff response to Resident #47's call light was often over the facility expected 10 minute response time. ED stated she will print the call light log each day and discuss with the aides to find out what caused a delay in answering call lights over ten minutes.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00165361.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
November 7, 2024Licensure survey2 deficiencies
R-0097Personnel recordOhio citation · correction confirmed 03/31/2026
What the surveyor found

Based on employee personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) reports for each employee was maintained in a confidential manner either sealed in, or kept separate from, but part of the employee personnel file. This had the potential to effect all 78 residents residing in the facility. The census was 78.

Findings include:

1. Review of the Executive Director's (ED) personnel file revealed a hire date of 10/04/23 with no evidence of a BCI report completed.

2. Review of Resident Care Associate (RCA) #302's personnel file revealed a hire date of 09/26/24 with no evidence of a BCI report completed.

3. Review of Medication Technician (MT) #305's personnel file revealed a hire date of 09/05/24 with no evidence of a BCI report completed.

4. Review of Dishwasher #300's personnel file revealed a hire date of 09/13/24 with no evidence of a BCI report completed.

5. Review of MT #205's personnel file revealed a hire date of 04/05/24 with no evidence of a BCI report completed.

6. Review of Dietary Aide (DA) #310's personnel file revealed a hire date of 10/05/23 with no evidence of a BCI report completed.

Interview on 11/07/24 at 3:00 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #400 confirmed she does not receive a background check paper report for each employee. BOM #400 stated the facility had a contract with an outside company to run the background checks, and they are notified by telephone if a result showed any criminal history. BOM #400 confirmed the BCI reports for the ED, RCA #302, MT #305, Dishwasher #300, MT #205, and DA #310 were not maintained within the personnel file, or separately but part of, each employee's personnel record.

Interview with the ED on 11/07/24 at 3:30 P.M. confirmed the facility did not have a policy for BCI reports.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0098Attestation, LogOhio citation · correction confirmed 03/31/2026
What the surveyor found

Based on employee personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an applicant log separate from the personnel record. This had the potential to effect all 78 residents residing in the facility. The census was 78.

Findings include:

During entrance conference for the annual and complaint survey on 11/07/24, the facility was asked to provided documentation for review including the applicant log and employee personnel records. No applicant log was provided prior to survey exit on 11/07/24.

Interview on 11/07/24 at 3:00 P.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #400 confirmed she does not maintain an applicant log separate from the employee personnel files. BOM #400 stated the facility had a contract with an outside company to run the background checks, and they are notified by telephone if a result showed any criminal history.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
September 12, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
December 18, 2023Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
October 16, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
May 18, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
March 21, 2023Complaint survey2 deficiencies
R-0344Prescribed meds kept in locked storageOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately. This affected two residents (#11 and #17) and had the potential to affect all 21 residents residing on the 200 hall (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #9, #10, #11, #14, #15, #16, #17, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, and #43). The census was 86.

Findings include:

1. Clinical record review for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 08/31/22 with diagnoses including encephalopathy and stroke.

Observation of Resident #17 in her room on 03/20/23 at 8:40 A.M. revealed Resident #17 was sitting in a recliner chair with a cup containing seven medications sitting on the nightstand. The medications included: gabapentin (medicaiton used for neuropathy) 100 milligram (mg) two tablets, sertraline (anti-depressant medication) 100 mg one tablet, potassium chloride 20 milliequivalents (meq) one tablet, spironolactone (diuretic medication) 250 mg one tablet, baby aspirin one tablet and flecainide (anti-arrthymic medication) 100 mg one tablet. At that time, Resident #17 stated the nurse left the medications at the bedside because she takes them when she eats the food her son was going to bring in later.

Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #60 on 03/20/23 at 8:45 A.M. verified there were seven medications in a cup which had been left on Resident #17's nightstand. After surveyor intervention, LPN #60 told Resident #17 she had to observe her swallow the medications at that time. LPN #60 verified Resident #17 was not safe to self-administer medications.

2. Clinical record review for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 10/31/22 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, and urinary tract infection.

Observation of Resident #11 in her bed on 03/20/23 at 8:50 A.M., revealed Resident #11 had a cup with 11 medications on the tray table near her couch. The cup contained one tablet of each of the following medications: Ciprofloxacin (antibiotic medication) 500 mg; Flagyl (antibiotic medication) 500 mg; Carbidopa/levodopa (medication used to treat Parkinson's disease) 50 mg; Pramipexole (medication used to treat Parkinson's disease) 0.25 mg; Amantadine (medication used to treat Parkinson's disease) 100 mg; Pantoprazole (proton pump inhibitor) 40 mg; Cymbalta (anti-depressant medication) 60 mg; Buspirone (anti-anxiety medication) 7.5 mg; Fludrocortisone (corticosteroid medication) 0.1 mg; hydrochlorothyiazide (diuretic medication) 12.5 mg; and Plavix (antiplatelet medication) 75 mg.

Interview with LPN #60 on 03/20/23 at 8:55 A.M., verified there were 11 medications in a cup which had been left on Resident #11's tray table. After surveyor intervention, LPN #60 told Resident #11 she had to observe her swallow the medications at that time. LPN #60 verified Resident #11 was not safe to self-administer medications.

Interview with the Administrator on 03/20/23 at 9:50 A.M. revealed it was never acceptable for a nurse to leave medications with a resident and not observe the resident swallow the medications.

3. Observation on 03/21/23 from 7:11 A.M. through 7:21 A.M., revealed the medication cart located outside Room 207 was unlocked and no staff were observed to be around the cart. Resident Care Assistant (RCA) #802 was then found and stated the licensed nurse for the unit was not currently on the floor. The interview confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and RCA #802 indicated she would get the nurse. LPN #76 arrived to the 200 hallway medication cart at 03/21/23 at 7:28 A.M. and confirmed the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended.

Review of the policy titled Medication Administration

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0399Water management program; legionella preventionOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on review of the state of ohio Certification and Licensure (CALS) system and staff interview, the facility failed to appoint a infection control designee and include their name and contact information in the state of ohio CALS system. This had the potential to affect all 86 residents residing in the facility. The census was 86.

Findings include:

Review of the state of ohio's CALS system for the facility revealed the section for the infection control coordinator was blank in the system.

Interview with the facility Director of Nursing on 03/21/23 at 8:41 A.M. confirmed there was no infection control coordinator listed for the facility in the CALS system. The interview revealed she was not sure which staff should be listed there.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
January 13, 2023Licensure survey6 deficiencies
R-0312Initial health assessment contentOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assess resident's height and record in the medical record. This affected four (#3, #6, #7, and #8) of six medical records reviewed for documentation of resident's height. Facility census was 92.

Findings include:

1. Review of medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on 11/29/22, with diagnoses: rheumatoid arthritis, edema, and hypertension. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #3's height.

Interview on 01/13/22 at 12:32 P.M., Administrator verified Resident #3's height was not recorded in the medical record.

2. Review of medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted on 05/25/21, with diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease, major depressive disorder, and urinary incontinence. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #6's height.

Interview on 01/13/22 at 12:32 P.M., Administrator verified Resident #6's height was not recorded in the medical record.

3. Review of medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted on 12/23/21, with diagnoses: type two diabetes mellitus, cellulitis of left lower leg, embolism and thrombosis for femoral vein, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, kidney failure, major depressive disorder, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #7's height.

Interview on 01/13/22 at 12:32 P.M., Administrator verified Resident #7's height was not recorded in the medical record.

4. Review of medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on 11/15/22, with diagnoses: history of traumatic brain injury, dysphasia, and hypotension. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation of Resident #8's height.

Interview on 01/13/22 at 12:32 P.M., Administrator verified Resident #8's height was not recorded in the medical record.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0391Resident incidents and log; identify resident upon requestOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on review of the incident and accident log and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete incident/accident log, which contained the time, place, date of the occurrence, a general description of the incident, and the care provided or action taken. This had the potential to affect 92 of 92 residents. The faciltiy census was 92.

Findings include:

Review of the print out of incident/accident log revealed the following categories: incident number, incident date, incident close date, type/nature of incident, and resident name. This form was provided by the Administrator.

Interview on 01/13/23 at 12:26 P.M., with the Administrator verified the log did not contain all of the required information.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0567Special diets; preparation and menuOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on review of resident diet list and staff interview, the facility failed to have a dietitian to monitor the therapeutic diets and nutritional needs of the residents. This affected 24 (#2, #3, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #24, #28, #29, #34, #59, #63, #69, #72, #74, #77, #83, #87, and #92) of 24 residents reviewed for nutrition.. Facility census was 92.

Findings include:

Review of resident diet order list revealed:

Resident #5 was ordered a no concentrated sweet diet.

Resident #8 was ordered nothing by mouth and eternal tube feeding.

Resident #24 was ordered carbohydrate control diet.

Resident #63 was ordered low carbohydrate and no concentrated sweet diet.

Resident #3, #29, #34, #72, and #74 were ordered a no added salt diet.

Resident #2, #14, #28, #59, #69, #77, and #83 were ordered a mechanical soft diet.

Resident #6, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #87, and #92 were ordered a pureed diet.

Interview on 01/13/23 at 12:32 P.M., Administrator verified the facility currently did not have a dietitian to monitor therapeutic diets including resident's intake and acceptance of diet and if any diets needed to be adjusted. The Administrator verified this was the physician ordered diets for the residents listed.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0614Notify director when normal business interruption due to emergency/disasterOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on review of fire drills and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct fire drills each shift every quarter. The facility also failed to have residents evacuate at least two fire drills a year on each shift. This had the potential to affect 92 of 92 residents in the faciltiy. The census was 92.

Findings include:

Review of the fire drills from January 2022 through December 2022 revealed the following:

a fire drill was not completed from 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M., during the first quarter of 2022;

fire drills were not completed from 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M., during the third quarter of 2022;

a fire drills were also not completed from 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. and 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., during the fourth quarter of 2022.

Review of the fire drills from January 2022 through December 2022, revealed no residents that were capable of self-evacuation were evacuated to safe areas during any of the fire drills.

Interview on 01/13/23 at 2:25 P.M. Maintenance Director #1 verified fire drills were not completed every shift, every quarter during 2022. Maintenance Director #1 also verified residents did not participate in any of the fire drills.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0701Establish grievance committeeOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on review of the Grievance Procedure and staff interview, the facility failed to establish a grievance committee. This had the potential to affect 92 of 92 residents in the facility. The census was 92.

Findings include:

Review of the Grievance Procedure, dated 11/30/22, revealed the facility would establish a grievance committee comprised of facility staff, residents or outside representatives to ensure investigation and resolution of complaints. The committee would have a ratio of one staff member for every two residents or outside representatives

Interview on 01/13/23 at 12:26 P.M., Administrator verified the facility did not have a grievance committee established.

.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0720PrivacyOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained for resident care. This affected eight (#76, #77, #82, #83, #84, #85, #86, and #87) of eight residents observed for privacy and had the potential to affect all 20 residents who had semi-private rooms without a form of privacy barrier. The census was 92.

Findings include:

Observation on 01/13/23 at 9:17 A.M., during tour of the facility, revealed privacy curtains were not in place for residents who shared a room. Resident #76, and #77, #82 and #83, #84 and #85, #86, and #87, were in semi-private rooms with two beds facing each other. There was no privacy curtain or any form of privacy barrier in these rooms.

Interview on 01/13/23 at 2:32 P.M., Administrator verified no privacy barriers had been put in place. The facility was waiting on corporate to get estimates for privacy curtains. The Administrator verified this potentially could affect 20 residents who reside in semi private rooms.

This violation represents the continued noncompliance from the survey dated 11/03/22.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
November 3, 2022Complaint survey2 deficiencies
R-0712Adequate and appropriate treatment and careOhio citation · correction confirmed 01/13/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure resident weights were obtained as ordered. This affected one (Resident #98) of four residents reviewed for weights and dietary services. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 05/06/22 and a discharge date of 06/06/22. Diagnoses included heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes type two, high blood pressure, localized swelling, morbid obesity, and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #98's care plan, dated 05/06/22, revealed the resident had a diagnoses of heart failure and staff were to obtain weights per the physician orders. Review of the physical assessment dated 05/06/22, revealed the physician noted a plan for Resident #98 to have daily weights. Review of Resident #98's physician order form, dated 05/31/22, revealed an order to check weights daily. Review of Resident #98's weights revealed she was weighed on 05/06/22, 05/08/22, 06/02/22, 06/03/22, 06/04/22, and 06/06/22. There was no documented evidence that Resident #98 had her weights monitored daily per the physicians note on 05/06/22. Interview on 11/03/22 at 12:24 P.M. with the Executive Director confirmed no daily weights were obtained per Resident #98's physicians plan from 05/06/22. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Vital Signs: WeightBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure resident weights were obtained as ordered. This affected one (Resident #98) of four residents reviewed for weights and dietary services. The facility census was 96.

Findings Include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 05/06/22 and a discharge date of 06/06/22. Diagnoses included heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes type two, high blood pressure, localized swelling, morbid obesity, and acute kidney failure.

Review of Resident #98's care plan, dated 05/06/22, revealed the resident had a diagnoses of heart failure and staff were to obtain weights per the physician orders.

Review of the physical assessment dated 05/06/22, revealed the physician noted a plan for Resident #98 to have daily weights.

Review of Resident #98's physician order form, dated 05/31/22, revealed an order to check weights daily.

Review of Resident #98's weights revealed she was weighed on 05/06/22, 05/08/22, 06/02/22, 06/03/22, 06/04/22, and 06/06/22. There was no documented evidence that Resident #98 had her weights monitored daily per the physicians note on 05/06/22.

Interview on 11/03/22 at 12:24 P.M. with the Executive Director confirmed no daily weights were obtained per Resident #98's physicians plan from 05/06/22.

Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Vital Signs: Weight

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0720PrivacyOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview and review of the facility's resident agreement, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained for resident care. This affected two (Residents (#5 and #6) of five residents reviewed for privacy and had the potential to affect all 20 residents who had semi-private rooms without a form of privacy barrier. The census was 96.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/15/21. Diagnoses included heart failure, diabetes mellitus type two, and muscle weakness.

Review of the care plan dated 05/17/22, revealed Resident #5 wears incontinence products and she will receive total care for urinary incontinence. It also stated Resident #5 required total assistance for fecal-incontinence related problems with interventions for the resident to have total staff assistance with fecal-incontinence related problems. The care plan stated Resident #5 required assistance with personal hygiene and staff will provide assistance with personal hygiene, including nail care and showering two times weekly and as needed.

Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 04/01/21. Diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, constipation, conduct disorder, and history of urinary tract infections.

Review of the care plan dated 04/01/21 revealed Resident #6 would require total assistance with bladder management and she would need checked and changed every two hours and as needed. It also stated the resident required total assistance with fecal incontinence related problems and she would require total assistance with fecal incontinence related problems. The care plan further revealed Resident #6 required assistance with personal hygiene with interventions for staff to provide assistance with personal hygiene, including nail care and showering two times a week and as needed.

Observation on 11/02/22 at 2:50 P.M. revealed Resident #5 and Resident #6's room was a semi-private room (one large room) with two beds facing each other at each end of the room. There was no privacy curtain or any form of privacy barrier in this room.

Interview on 11/02/22 at 11:37 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #102 revealed the staff cares for residents that were in a double bedroom (semi-private) very carefully as there was no form of barrier. She stated she will ask one resident to move outside while the other was being changed or whatever the care may be. She confirmed though that sometimes it was not possible to provide full privacy so they were careful, but she would like there to be a barrier for them.

Interview on 11/02/22 at 2:50 P.M. with Resident #6 revealed she had a shared room with Resident #5. Resident #6 stated there was no privacy in her room and she and Resident #5 were mostly bed bound and receiving a lot of care in bed. She stated she tries to ignore the lack of privacy and to just try to get through the care being provided, but she knows Resident #5 was able to see her. She stated she knows Resident #5 tries to ignore it too. Resident #6 was on the phone with her family during the interview and her family confirmed the above knowledge and the lack of privacy. Subsequent interview on 11/03/22 at 7:35 A.M. with Resident #6 revealed she would like some sort of privacy barrier.

Interview on 11/02/22 at 3:10 P.M. with the Executive Director revealed the facility staff was told by their corporation that they didn't need curtains/barriers in semi-private rooms, so none of the semi-private rooms had them, but they would think the residents would need a sort of barrier between them when providing care. She stated both Resident #5 and #6 were able to get out of bed, but they chose to stay in the bed. She further stated when a resident was bed bound, they would expect a barrier for care if in a semi-private room setting.

Interview on 11/03/22 at 7:30 A.M. with Resident #5 revealed she always looks the other way when Resident #6 was receiving care, but she know Resident #6 watches her receive care. She stated she would like some sort of privacy barrier.

Observation on 11/03/22 at 8:40 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) #105 and Resident Care Assistant (RCA) #107 revealed incontinence care and activities of daily living care for Resident #5. Resident #6 was also in the room. STNA #105 had two training staff hold a blanket between the residents to provide a barrier between the residents during the care.

Interview on 11/03/22 at 9:43 A.M. with STNA #105 revealed there were normally two aides and one nurse on duty, there happened to be four this day because they were training two new aides. She stated if there was enough staff, they will have them hold a blanket to create a barrier between Resident #5 and #6 and if there was not extra staff, one of the aides will stand between the residents to be a barrier, but they were only so wide themselves and they do their best.

Interview on 11/03/22 at 9:05 A.M. with RN #106 revealed every resident has to sign a resident agreement upon admission.

Review of the Residency Agreement, dated 11/20/20, revealed resident shall have the right to privacy in medical examinations, treatments, and in caring for all personal needs.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00136849 and Complaint Numbers OH00133753 and OH00133189.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules

Resident Satisfaction

2025-2026 survey

Ohio interviews residents directly and publishes the results by area. Scores run from 0 to 100.

74.9Overall satisfaction score
85.5Ohio average
Below Ohio average
AreaThis facility 
Care and services85.2
Caregivers70.9
Environment92.1
Facility culture75.5
Meals and dining84.4
Moving in59.6
Spending time68.7