10
Inspections on file
7
Deficiencies cited
7
Visits with none
0
Substandard care
0
Immediate jeopardy

The most recent inspection on file for Artis Senior Living of Bridgetown took place on February 27, 2026. Across the 10 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 7 deficiencies.

A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.

This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 10 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 3; for the other 7 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 7 of which found none.

Facility Details

Ohio license number
#2757R
County
Hamilton
Administrator
John Tepe
Director of nursing
Michelle Cardwell
Phone
(513) 832-1597
Ownership
For Profit - Corporation

Inspections

10 on file · 7 deficiencies
February 27, 2026Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
July 22, 2025Licensure survey5 deficiencies
R-0090Administrator responsible for meeting requirementsOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff members had a criminal background check completed and on file. This affected two (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #171 and Housekeeper #150) of the five personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

1) Review of personnel file on 07/22/2025 for LPN #171 revealed no documentation that a criminal background check was completed. Review of a document titled New Hire Sign Off Sheet in the personnel file for LPN #171 contained no indication that a background check had been completed or received by the facility.

Interview on 07/22/2025 at 4:10 P.M. with Director of Business Services (DBS) #129 confirmed the facility had no documentation on file to indicate a criminal background check was completed for LPN #171.

2) Review of personnel file on 07/22/2025 for Housekeeper #150, revealed no documentation that a criminal background check was completed. Review of document titled New Hire Check List in Housekeeper #150's personnel file contained no indication that a background check had been completed or received by the facility.

Interview on 07/22/2025 at 4:10 P.M. with DBS #129 confirmed the facility had no documentation on file to indicate a criminal background check was completed for Housekeeper #150.

Interview on 07/22/2025 at 4:57 P.M. with Executive Director (ED) #215 revealed that ED #215 was unable to find a written policy on maintaining employee files. ED #215 verbally reported the standard procedure is for all employees to have a completed New Employee Checklist in their personnel file.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0098Attestation, LogOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a criminal background check log that was separate from personnel files. This impacted all staff members and had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

An interview on 07/22/25 at 4:34 P.M. with Executive Director (ED) #215 revealed the facility did not have a criminal background check log separate from personnel files. ED #215 provided acknowledgement that the facility should maintain a criminal background check log for all employees separate from personnel files.

Review of an undated document titled New Employee Checklist provided by ED #215 revealed that a BCI log entry is a requirement of the final verifications/spreadsheets section of this form.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0122Physical exams for staffOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that all staff members had a physical completed and on file. This affected one (Licensed Practical Nurse #171) of the five personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

Review of personnel file on 07/22/25 for LPN #171, revealed LPN #171's hire date was 05/28/25. The personnel file revealed no documentation that a physical was completed for LPN #171. Review of a document titled New Hire Sign Off Sheet in the personnel file for LPN #171 contained no indication that a physical had been completed.

Interview on 07/22/25 at 4:10 P.M. with Director of Business Services (DBS) #129 confirmed the facility had no documentation on file to indicate that a physical was completed for LPN #171.

Interview on 07/22/25 at 4:57 P.M. with Executive Director (ED) #215 revealed that ED #215 was unable to find a written policy on maintaining employee files. ED #215 stated the standard procedure was for all employees to have a completed New Employee Checklist in their personnel file which included having a physical.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0126Evidence of first aid trainingOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all required staff members had first aid training within 60 days of hire. This impacted one (Housekeeper #150) of the five personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

Review of personnel files on 07/22/25 for Housekeeper #150, revealed no documentation that Housekeeper #150 completed first-aid training within 60 days of hire.

Interview on 07/22/25 at 4:10 P.M. with Director of Business Services (DBS) #129 confirmed the facility had no documentation on file to indicate that Housekeeper #150 completed first-aid training.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0393Tuberculosis control plan and risk assessmentOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all staff members had Tuberculosis (TB) testing and/or annual TB screenings as outlined in the facility's TB prevention plan. This impacted four (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] #171, Housekeeper #150, Care Partner [CP] #105, and CP #153) of the five personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 54.

Findings include:

1) Review of personnel file on 07/22/25 revealed LPN #171's hire date was 05/28/25. The personnel file revealed no documented evidence that LPN #171 completed an initial TB test or other testing to rule out TB prior to employment. Review of a document titled New Hire Sign Off Sheet in the personnel file for LPN #171 contained no indication that a TB test or other testing to rule out TB had been completed.

2) Review of personnel file on 07/22/25 revealed Housekeeper #150's hire date was 03/19/25. The personnel file revealed no documented evidence Housekeeper #150 completed an initial TB test or other testing to rule out TB prior to employment. Review of a document titled New Hire Sign Off Sheet in the personnel file for Housekeeper #150 contained no indication that a TB test or other testing to rule out TB had been completed.

Interview on 07/22/25 at 4:10 P.M. with Director of Business Services (DBS) #129 confirmed LPN #171 and Housekeeper #150 did not obtain an initial TB test or other testing to rule out TB prior to working in the facility.

Review of facility policy revised 01/2023 and titled Tuberculosis Prevention and Monitoring: Associates revealed that prior to hire, all associates would complete a Tuberculosis Screening Questionnaire and associates would complete either a first and second step TB test or a chest x-ray. No associate will be permitted in the resident areas until a two-step TB test or chest x-ray had deemed employee free of TB.

3) Review of personnel file on 07/22/25 revealed that CP #105's hire date was 05/15/23. The personnel file revealed no documented evidence CP #105 completed a Tuberculosis Screening Questionnaire annually.

4) Review of personnel file on 07/22/25 revealed that CP #153's hire date was 10/25/22. The personnel file revealed no documented evidence CP #153 completed a Tuberculosis Screening Questionnaire annually.

Interview on 07/22/25 at 4:10 P.M. with DBS #129 confirmed CP #105 and CP #153 did not complete an annual Tuberculosis Screening Questionnaire.

Review of facility policy revised 01/23 and titled Tuberculosis Prevention and Monitoring: Associates revealed all current associates will complete the Tuberculosis Screening Questionnaire form annually.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
May 2, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
July 9, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
December 27, 2023Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
October 27, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
October 12, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
August 28, 2023Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0314Assess for change in conditionOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/27/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to adequately assess a resident who tested positive for Coronavirus (COVID-19). This affected one resident (#16) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 63 residents.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 04/24/23 with diagnoses including COVID-19, dementia, diabetes mellitus (DM), and depression.

Review of the admission health assessment for Resident #16 dated 04/24/23, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.)

Review of a fax communication sheet to the physician for Resident #16 dated 05/23/23, revealed the resident had tested positive for COVID-19 and the physician had responded with orders for Paxlovid (antiviral medication) based on the renal dosing and to hold Flomax (medication for enlarged prostate) and Primidone (anticonvulsant) for five days while taking Paxlovid and to hold Atorvastatin (statin medication to lower cholesterol) for eight days while taking Paxlovid.

Review of the nurse's progress note for Resident #16 dated 05/23/23, revealed the resident tested positive for COVID-19 and the physician was notified. Review of the nurse progress notes dated 05/23/23 to 05/31/23 revealed no documented evidence Resident #16 had a physical assessment, respiratory assessment and/or vital signs following the resident's COVID-19 diagnosis.

Review of the May 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #16, revealed Flomax, Primidone, and Atorvastatin were marked as held per the physician's order. Paxlovid two tablets daily for five days was marked as administered per physician's order from 05/24/23 to 05/30/23 for a total of ten doses.

Review of the May 2023 vital signs record for Resident #16, revealed the resident had vital signs taken on 05/15/23 and a daily temperature taken from 05/01/23 to 05/31/23.

Interview on 08/28/23 at 1:21 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed Resident #16 tested positive for COVID-19 on 05/23/23 and was treated with Paxlovid. The DON confirmed Resident #16's record did not include any assessments and vital signs following the resident's COVID-19 diagnosis. The DON confirmed Resident #16's record should include an assessment of resident's symptoms and respiratory status following a COVID-19 diagnosis.

Review of the facility policy titled Change of Condition dated January 2020, revealed staff will monitor residents for change in condition, nurses will provide assessment and intervention and prompt notification to the resident's physician and responsible party. Nurse will document assessment of the change in condition in the resident's medical record.

Review of the facility policy titled COVID-19 Protocols dated 05/11/23, revealed COVID-19 positive residents will have increased monitoring and if they do not have respiratory distress the resident may remain in the community and be managed in-house. Residents testing positive will be isolated in a single room with dedicated staff for at least five days after they first tested positive.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00144531

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
June 26, 2023Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0770Requirements of notificationOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/27/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on record review, staff interview, review of the resident agreement, and review of the facility admission packet, the facility failed to ensure residents discharged from the facility were provided with a written notice of discharge which included information regarding the resident's right to appeal the decision. This affected one resident (#64) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 63.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 12/21/22 with diagnoses including arthropathy, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, cataracts, and dementia and a discharge date of 05/17/23.

Review of care conference note for Resident #64 dated 05/10/23 revealed facility Director of Artis Way Experience (DAWE) #365 and Executive Director (ED) met with resident's representative and informed her if resident had another episode of unprovoked combativeness towards other residents the representative would need to find alternate placement. DAWE #365 suggested the name of another facility.

Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #64 dated 05/17/23, revealed the resident was involved in an altercation with another resident (Resident #14), and Resident #64 was sent to the hospital for psychiatric evaluation.

Interview on 06/26/23 at 9:05 A.M. with the ED and DAWE #365 confirmed Resident #64 had a history of aggressive behaviors towards other residents and the staff. ED confirmed Resident #64's behaviors had never resulted in any significant injury to others, but facility felt the resident was a risk to others due to his behaviors. ED confirmed he and DAWE #365 met with Resident #64's representative on 05/10/23 and informed her she would need to find alternate placement for resident if he had another episode of unprovoked aggression towards another resident. ED confirmed Resident #64 was physically aggressive towards Resident #14 and the facility obtained an order to send resident to the hospital via 911 for a psychiatric evaluation. ED confirmed the resident went to the hospital but was not admitted and the emergency personnel brought resident back to the facility. ED confirmed the facility staff told the emergency personnel they would not accept the resident back due to his aggressive behaviors, and the emergency personnel took Resident #64 back to the hospital. ED confirmed he spoke with hospital staff and told him the facility would not accept resident back due his aggressive behaviors. ED confirmed the hospital found alternate placement for the resident at another assisted living facility, and the Director of that facility called for an update on Resident #64's behaviors. ED confirmed the other facility accepted Resident #64 for admission and resident never returned to the facility. DAWE #365 confirmed all the information provided by the ED, and also that she was present when the facility met with Resident #64's representative on 05/10/23. ED and DAWE #365 confirmed Resident #64 and his representative were not provided with a written notice of discharge and were not advised of their rights to appeal the decision to discharge the resident.

Interview on 06/26/23 at 2:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) / Director of Health and Wellness (DHW) confirmed Resident #64 was involved in an altercation with Resident #14 on 05/17/23, and the facility sent Resident #64 to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation.

Review of the facility's Residency Agreement dated 01/01/20 revealed if a resident's condition changes so that the assessed level of assistance is no longer appropriate, the facility will reassess resident and determine appropriate level of need and will notify the resident and responsible party of the same. The facility may terminate the agreement at any time with or without cause by giving 30 days written notice to the responsible party or less than 30 days' notice if facility determines the resident is engaging in a behavior that is a threat to his/her mental and/or physical health and safety or the health and safety of others. The facility will assist the resident and responsible party with discharge planning and referrals.

Review of the undated facility's Admission Packet revealed the facility followed the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) which indicated the resident has the right not to be transferred or discharged from the home unless the transfer is necessary because safety of individuals in the home is endangered. The Administrator of the home should notify the resident and the resident's sponsor in writing of any proposed transfer or discharge from the home at least thirty days in advance. If an emergency arises and a thirty-day notice cannot be given, notice should be made as soon as possible. The written notice should be sent the state department of health and should be sent via certified mail with return receipt requested and should include the following: the reasons for the proposed transfer or discharge, the proposed date the resident is to be transferred or discharged, a proposed location to which the resident may relocate and a notice that the resident and resident's sponsor may choose another location to which the resident will relocate,

notice of the right of the resident and the resident's sponsor to an impartial hearing at the home on the proposed transfer or discharge, the manner in which and the time within which the resident or sponsor may request a hearing, the address of the legal services office of the department of health, the name, address and telephone number of the state long term care ombudsman, the proposed location to which a resident may relocate.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00143404.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
September 29, 2022Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.

Resident Satisfaction

2025-2026 survey

Ohio interviews residents directly and publishes the results by area. Scores run from 0 to 100.

91.2Overall satisfaction score
85.5Ohio average
Above Ohio average
AreaThis facility 
Care and services83.3
Caregivers93.2
Environment99.4
Facility culture89.1
Meals and dining93.0
Moving in88.9
Spending time85.2