19
Inspections on file
16
Deficiencies cited
11
Visits with none
0
Substandard care
0
Immediate jeopardy

The most recent inspection on file for Kensington Place took place on May 14, 2026. Across the 19 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 16 deficiencies.

A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.

This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 19 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 8; for the other 11 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 11 of which found none.

Facility Details

Ohio license number
#2667R
County
Franklin
Administrator
Erin Stucky
Director of nursing
Stephanie Walker-Howard
Phone
(614) 251-7688
Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation

Inspections

19 on file · 16 deficiencies
May 14, 2026Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0339Administered meds - given only to and as prescribedOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were not pre-poured prior to medication administration. This had the potential to affect 28 residents (#1, #40, #24, #32, #21, #55, #61, #12, #43, #62, #19, #20, #7, #8, #11, #12, #44, #52, #56, #9, #29, #63, #41, #31, #25, #36, #18 and #45) of 28 residents assigned to Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #112 for medication administration. The facility census was 66.

Findings include:

Observation on 05/14/26 at 7:58 A.M. revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #112 administering medications. On top of the medication cart were five medication cups labeled with various resident room numbers. The medication cups contained medications that had been removed from their original packaging prior to administration.

Interview on 05/14/26 at 8:04 A.M. with CMA #112, who reported working at the facility since last year, revealed the staff member identified herself as a medication technician and stated she had been instructed not to speak with state surveyors. The staff member acknowledged that multiple pre-prepared medication cups had been on the medication cart and stated the medications had already been administered. She confirmed that pre-preparing medications was not an acceptable standard practice. When asked to open the medication cart for observation, the staff member refused.

Interview on 05/14/26 at 12:02 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed that pre-preparation of medications is not permitted and is not part of standard nursing practice. The Administrator confirmed that medications must be prepared and administered directly from the original packaging at the time of administration.

Interview on 05/14/26 at 4:50 P.M. with the Director of Nursing confirmed that pre-pouring and preparing medications is not consistent with standard nursing practice or facility policy. The Director of Nursing confirmed medications must be prepared before administration and that staff should not have multiple pre-prepared medication cups on the medication cart at any time.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00170326.

This violation is evidence of continued non-compliance from the survey dated 07/08/25.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
April 1, 2026Complaint survey3 deficiencies
R-0344Prescribed meds kept in locked storageOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure medications were secured from unauthorized access. This had the potential to affect three residents (#33, #42 and #59) of 12 residents identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile on the fourth floor. The census was 59.

Findings include:

Observation on 03/26/26 at 8:35 A.M. revealed a medication cart was observed unlocked on the fourth floor with no staff in attendance and no staff were seen on the fourth floor and residents were returning from breakfast. At 8:45 A.M. the surveyor found the Director of Recreation (#285) and she confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and unattended by staff and she locked the medication cart.

Observation on 03/27/26 at 8:10 A.M. on the fourth floor revealed the medication cart was left unattended and unlocked. At 8:14 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 returned and verified he had left it unlocked because maintenance was supposed to be working on it because it was not working.

The facility identified three residents (#33, #42, and #59) as being cognitively impaired and independently mobile and would be able to access the unsecured medication cart.

This violation represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number Master Complaint Number OH00170156 and Complaint Number OH00169754.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0390Significant change in resident statusOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and timely identify a decline in Resident #59's condition thereby delaying treatment and necessary medical care for the resident. In addition, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of the decline in condition. This affected one resident (#59) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 59.

Actual harm occurred on 03/19/26 when Resident #59, who had a diagnosis of dementia with memory loss was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with sepsis, acute kidney failure, high sodium levels, urinary tract infection and an elevated troponin level. Upon physical examination in the hospital the resident's mucous membranes were dry with poor skin turgor (sign of dehydration). Resident #59 required intravenous antibiotics and fluids to treat his condition. Prior to being transferred to the hospital, on 03/03/26 the resident was assessed to be more lethargic. However, the facility failed to provide evidence of ongoing comprehensive monitoring and/or intervention between 03/03/26 and 03/19/26 to prevent hospitalization. The resident was hospitalized until 03/28/26.

Findings include:

Review of the closed medical record for Resident #59 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 09/26/25 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, memory deficit, arteriosclerotic heart disease, functional dyspepsia, and high blood pressure.

Review of Resident #59's service plan dated 10/06/25 revealed the resident had moderate dementia with significant short-term memory and possibly long-term memory loss. Resident #59 required reminders and set up for hair care, washing face, shaving, oral care. Care Staff would report any changes in the resident's ability to provide personal hygiene/oral care. The service plan included the resident demonstrated inappropriate judgment related to safety.

Review of the progress noted dated 03/03/26 at 10:01 P.M. revealed Resident #59 appeared lethargic throughout the shift and was observed having difficulty keeping his eyes open. The note included the resident was weak and fatigued for the majority of the day. All meals were offered; however, he refused to eat. With encouragement the resident was able to drink a Boost (nutritional) supplement, which resulted in slight improvement in alertness, though he remained weak and tired. The note included Resident #59 would continue to be monitored. However, there was no evidence the physician or resident's family was notified of this change in the resident's condition.

Record review revealed no evidence a comprehensive assessment of the resident including vital sign monitoring was completed at this time.

The next progress note dated 03/08/2026 at 9:59 A.M. revealed staff documented Resident #59 appeared to be more energetic this A.M. His eyes were fully open and he was communicative.

Record review revealed no progress notes between 03/08/26 at 9:59 A.M. and 03/18/26 at 2:44 P.M. regarding the resident's status or condition.

Review of a progress note dated 03/18/26 at 2:44 P.M. revealed the nurse received a phone order to crush the resident's medication. However, there was no corresponding information related to why the resident now had to have his medications crushed or evidence of an assessment of the resident's status/condition at this time.

Review of a progress note dated 03/19/26 at 11:15 P.M. revealed the nurse received a call from a Veterans Administration (VA) nurse with a new order for Potassium Chloride 20 milliequivalent (meq) one tablet twice a day. However, there was no corresponding information related to why the medication was ordered or evidence of an assessment of the resident's status/condition at this time.

Record review revealed no evidence of laboratory testing or laboratory results in the resident's medical record.

Resident #59 was transferred to the hospital on 03/19/26. However, there was no information contained in the record or progress notes on 03/19/26 to indicate why he was transferred or what the resident's status/condition was at the time of transfer.

Review of hospital documentation dated 03/19/26 revealed Resident #59 arrived (to the hospital) by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for altered mental status. EMS reported the resident was at an assisted living facility and was found in bed altered (without evidence of trauma or injury). EMS stated the resident's room did have a strong urine odor. The resident's glucose was 138 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (normal range 70-99 mg/dL). EMS stated they did not know the resident's baseline mentation and neither did the facility. Emergency room staff were unable to gather any history from the resident given his current altered state.

Review of hospital admission documentation revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses of sepsis, altered mental status, acute kidney failure, high sodium levels, urinary tract infection, elevated troponin level and difficulty walking. Physical exam on admission revealed the resident's mucous membranes were dry with poor skin turgor (a sign of dehydration). Resident #59 was started on Vancomycin (antibiotic), Zosyn (antibiotic) and IV (intravenous) fluids. The resident was also assessed to be hyernatremic (high sodium). Additional laboratory testing revealed chloride 133 meq/L (normal 96-106 meq/L) (an abnormal result can indicate dehydration and kidney disease), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 56 mg/dl (normal range 7 to 20 mg/dl) (also indicative of dehydration) and a GFR of 11 ml/min (normal 90-120 ml /min) (also indicative of kidney disease).

On 03/26/26 at 9:40 A.M., interview with Resident #59's daughter revealed her father was still in the hospital but slowly improving. The daughter reported the resident was severely dehydrated upon his admission to the hospital. During the interview the resident's daughter voiced concerns related to the overall care the resident had received and was concerned about the lack of licensed nurses to administer medications and that the Director of Nursing had quit.

On 03/26/26 at 3:44 P.M. interview with the Executive Director (ED) verified there was no documentation to support Resident #59's condition had been monitored (or provided necessary intervention) prior to him being transferred to the hospital. In addition, the ED also verified there was no documentation in the medical record to reflect why the resident was transferred to the emergency room.

On 03/27/26 at 11:15 AM, a telephone interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 revealed she worked at night. She stated on 03/19/26 as soon as she came on duty she knew something was going on with Resident #59. The family was present and the resident had a change in condition. LPN #206 spoke to the resident's daughter and a decision was made to transfer the resident to the hospital. The resident was weak and lethargic; he would respond, but he just wasn't with it. The resident had not been eating or drinking, so she thought he was dehydrated. LPN #206 stated she called 911 and after being rerouted on the call, they sent someone out to transfer the resident. During the interview, LPN #206 revealed she had heard the resident was admitted with sepsis and then transferred to large metropolitan trauma hospital for treatment.

Attempts to interview the resident's physician during the investigation were unsuccessful as the physician refused to speak with the surveyor.

Review of the facility undated Change in Condition policy revealed make a notation of the change in the health status and any intervention taken should be noted in the resident's record. Notify the sponsor to be notified. The documentation for this notification would be found in the resident's medical record.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00170156.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0712Adequate and appropriate treatment and careOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to administer and secure ordered medications. This affected three residents (#3, #40 and #59) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 59.

Findings include:

1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed he was admitted to the facility on 09/26/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, memory deficit, arteriosclerotic heart disease, functional dyspepsia, and high blood pressure.

Review of the resident's progress notes revealed the following:

On 02/05/26, and 02/07/26 Paroxetine HCL (antidepressant) 10 milligrams (mg), give 1/2 tablet (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/30/26, 02/03/26, 02/04/26, 02/05/26, 02/07/26, 02/08/26, and 02/10/26 Finasteride (treatment of enlarged prostate) 5 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 02/08/26 Gabapentin (treatment of nerve pain) 100 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/23/26, and 02/22/26 Donepzil (used for treatment of dementia) 5 mg two tablets (receives once a day at bedtime) was unavailable.

On 03/26/26 at 3:44 P.M. interview with the Executive Director revealed potassium did come up missing and they do not know where it went. The Executive Director called the doctor and was going to have the company pay for the missing potassium, but Resident #59 went to the hospital prior to getting the potassium.

Review of the facility documentation revealed on 03/18/26 the missing potassium was reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) by the Executive Director. The potassium was given to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #153 in a brown paper bag from a pharmacy by a friend of the family and then LPN #153 gave it to LPN #166. It was told to the friend they had an order for liquid potassium and if they wanted him to have the pills, a prescription was needed from the physician.

The facility documentation revealed an investigation of nursing areas and all medication carts revealed no bottle of potassium was found. On 03/19/26 the Executive Director revealed LPN #301 was making a call to Resident #59's physician. On 03/20/26 the resident was sent to the hospital.

2. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on 03/14/13 with diagnoses of atrial fib, PVD, CHF, pressure ulcer of the right hip (Stage III) and cardiomyopathy.

On 01/21/26 Metoprolol ER ( blood pressure medications) 25 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/20/26, and 01/21/26 Multivitamin (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/21/26 Ascorbic Acid 250 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/20/26, 01/21/26 Docusate Sodium (stool softener) 100 mg two capsules (receives twice a day) was unavailable.

On 01/21/26 Simvastin (cholesterol medication) 40 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/21/26, and 01/22/26 Apixaban 5 mg (blood thinner) (receives twice a day) was unavailable.

On 02/04/26, 02/07/26, and 02/08/26 Gabapentin (treatment for nerve pain) 600 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/17/26 and 02/15/26 Melatonin (helps with sleep) 10 mg (receives once a day at bedtime) was unavailable.

On 01/22/26, 01/24/26, 01/25/26, 01/29/26, 02/03/26, and 03/16/26 Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D supplement)25 mcg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/30/26, and 03/16/26 Potassium Chloride 20 meq (milliequivilents) (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 03/24/26 Glucosamine (used for joint health) 750 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 01/19/26 and 03/26/26 Levothyroxine Sodium (thyroid medication) 50 micrograms (mcg) (receives once a day) was unavailable.

3. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on 01/31/20. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, scoliosis, high blood pressure and dementia.

On 02/27/26 Atorvastatin (cholesterol medication) 40 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 03/01/26 Melatonin 5 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

On 02/21/26, 02/22/26, 02/26/26, 03/03/26 PreserVision AREDS (receives twice a day) was unavailable.

On 01/25/26, 01/27/26, 01/28/26, 01/29/26, 01/30/26, 02/18/26, 02/19/26, 02/21/26, 02/23/26, 03/03/26, 03/06/26,03/08/26,03/15/26, 03/18/26, 03/19/26, 03/21/26, 03/22/26, 03/26/26 Fexofedadine (allergy medication) HCL 30 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.

Interview with the Executive Director on 03/26/26 at 3:44 P.M. verified the medications were documented as unavailable.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00170156.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
September 3, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
July 8, 2025Licensure survey2 deficiencies
R-0339Administered meds - given only to and as prescribedOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility to ensure an extended release medication was not crushed prior to administration. This affected one (Resident #38) of two residents reviewed for medications administration. The facility census was 47.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 09/10/24 with diagnoses of dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

The service plan report dated 09/10/24 revealed a goal to maintain medication management with assistance.

Review of the physician order dated 09/11/24 revealed Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) 24 hours 25 milligrams (mg) one time a day for high blood pressure. There were no instructions on if the medication can be crushed or not crushed.

Observation of medication administration on 07/08/25 at 9:42 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #171 was administering medications to Resident #38. LPN #171 crushed the medications including Metoprolol Succinate extended release 24 hours 25 mg. LPN #171 confirmed all medications including Metoprolol Succinate prepared were appropriate for crushing since this was not specified in the medication administration instructions. LPN #171 confirmed the Metoprolol Succinate was an extended-release tablet.

Interview on 07/08/25 at 1:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Metoprolol Succinate ER was on the do not crush list.

Review of facilities Medications that should not be Crushed dated 04/2025 revealed Metoprolol Succinate tablet modified release should not be crushed.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0559Procure, store, prepare, distribute and serve foodsOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during kitchen tasks. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents who received food from the kitchen.

Findings include:

Observations on 07/08/25 between 12:04 P.M. and 12:18 P.M. revealed Cook #156 and Cook #147 were actively working on the cooking the food and plating the food on the trayline. During this time, Cook #156 were observed donning clean gloves and reaching directly into a bread bag to retrieve a hamburger bun. While still wearing the same gloves, Cook #156 moved to the grill line, used a spatula to flip meat, and then returned to the prep station, where she handled lettuce, tomato, and onion with gloved hands to assemble the burger. She was further observed opening and closing the cooler cabinet, reaching again into the bread bag for a hot dog bun, and returning to the grill to prepare a hot dog, all without changing gloves. After completing these tasks, Cook #156 removed her gloves, donned a new pair without performing hand hygiene, and wiped her nose with her wrist during the process.

Interview on 07/08/25 at 12:18 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #157 confirmed staff were expected to perform hand hygiene before putting on new gloves and acknowledged that tongs were not required in bread bags when gloves were changed appropriately and hand hygiene was performed. However, DM #157 also stated that when multiple tasks were being conducted, especially in areas with high risk for contamination, such as retrieving produce from the deli fridge or handling multiple food items, tongs should be used to prevent cross-contamination.

Interview on 07/08/25 at 12:20 P.M. with Cook #156 and DM #157 confirmed Dietary Cook #156 should have changed gloves and washed their hands in between each task.

Review of the facilities Infection Control and Handwashing Policies

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
May 27, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
March 27, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
January 24, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
November 23, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
October 15, 2024Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0390Significant change in resident statusOhio citation · correction confirmed 07/08/2025
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and interview the facility failed to take immediate and proper steps following a change in Resident #11's health status to ensure the resident received appropriate and proper care and to prevent complications. The facility failed to timely address, monitor, and treat the resident's urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#11) of three resident changes in condition reviewed. The census was 106.

Findings Include:

Record review revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on 06/02/21 with diagnoses including basil cell carcinoma, actinic keratosis, polymyalgia rheumatica, hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, and vitamin D deficiency.

Review of the assisted living wellness assessment, dated 06/06/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact.

Review of Resident #11 urinalysis lab test and results revealed a urine sample for testing was obtained on 09/11/24 and submitted that day to the laboratory. On 09/12/24, the results were available which revealed the resident had a urinary tract infection (UTI).

Review of Resident #11's physician's orders, dated 09/19/24 (seven days after the urine test was completed), revealed the resident was prescribed the antibiotic, Fosfomycin Tromethamine three grams with an order to take one packet by mouth one time only for her urinary tract infection. There was no medical documentation to support she was treated or monitored for her UTI from the time the results were read on 09/12/24, and when the first medication was ordered to treat her UTI on 09/19/24.

Interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #153 on 10/10/24 at 1:45 P.M. and 3:30 P.M. revealed Resident #11 was deemed to be independent and they didn't order/prescribe or administer any of her medications. She confirmed the facility ordered Resident #11's urinalysis to determine if she had a UTI, but she stated she had no information as to who would get the results and/or order any medication for the UTI. She stated again Resident #11 was independent and would be able to do all of this herself. She confirmed she was able to get the urinalysis results online.

Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/10/24 at 3:50 P.M. confirmed the dates of when the UTI results were available (09/12/24) and the date in which they added medication to treat the resident's UTI was put into her medical record (09/19/24). She stated she was not sure if medications or treatment were ordered prior to 09/19/24, or if Resident #11 had seen the urinalysis results between 09/12/24 to 09/19/24, because Resident #11 was independent with her medical care.

Interview with Resident #11 on 10/10/24 at 4:00 P.M. revealed she was not aware of the urinalysis results until 09/19/24. She stated she was not feeling well on 09/11/24 and went to the nurse's station to ask for a urine sample collection kit so she could be tested for a UTI. She stated she collected her sample and gave it back to the nurse's for them to send to the lab for analyzing. She revealed she did not hear anything from the facility about the results, until she asked about them on 09/19/24, when she was told she was positive for a UTI. The resident stated she was very frustrated about this, because she was told she would get the results from the nurses. She confirmed she did not start medication or treatment for the UTI until 09/19/24.

Review of documentation on file with the State agency as part of the facility residential care facility license revealed the room Resident #11 resided in was a licensed residential care facility bed.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00157937.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
August 5, 2024Licensure survey4 deficiencies
R-0312Initial health assessment contentOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the falls assessment was completed for all residents upon admission. This affected one (Resident #6) of seven residents for initial health assessments. The facility census was 103.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 04/23/24 with diagnoses including cellulitis of right lower limb, localized edema, and dyspnea.

Review of Resident #6's assessments from 04/23/24 to 08/05/24 revealed the initial falls assessment was not completed.

Review of Resident #6's progress notes from 04/23/24-08/05/24 revealed Resident #6 had falls on 06/30/24, 07/23/24, and 08/03/24

Interview on 08/05/24 at 2:45 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified all residents should have a falls assessment upon admission and verified Resident #6 did not have a completed falls assessment.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0400Shared adult day care must be in compliance with ruleOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the Tuberculosis (TB) Mantoux testing for State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #58 prior to providing care for residents. This had the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility.

Findings include:

Review of STNA #58's personnel record revealed a hire date of 04/25/24. STNA #58's TB Mantoux test was initially conducted on 04/25/24 without a second step completed. STNA #58 had a Mantoux test first step on 05/21/24 and second step on 05/31/24.

Interview on 08/05/24 at 4:50 P.M. with Human Resource (HR) #225 verified STNA #58 started providing care prior to the completed Mantoux testing.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0504If skilled care provided - resident evaluated every 7 daysOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure ostomy bag changes were evaluated every seven days and comprehensively assessed. This affected one resident (Resident #3) out of one resident reviewed for skilled care. The facility census was 103.

Findings include:

Record review revealed Resident #3's admission date was 08/05/23 with diagnosis including malignant neoplasm.

Review of Resident #3's progress notes from 10/01/23 to 08/05/24 revealed no skilled charting documentation for the resident receiving ostomy care.

Interview on 08/05/24 at 1:32 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #3 had ostomy care provided for skilled care and verified there was no documentation or assessments every seven days for Resident #3.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0614Notify director when normal business interruption due to emergency/disasterOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident evacuations occurred during at least two fire drills a year on each shift. This had the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility.

Findings include:

Review of the fire drills revealed there were no evacuations of residents during the third-shift fire drills in the past year. The third-shift fire drills occurred on 11/30/23, 02/29/24, 05/31/24, and 07/31/24.

Interview on 08/05/24 at 9:36 A.M. with Maintenance Director #132 verified there were no evacuation of residents during the four third-shift fire drills in the past year.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
June 4, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
February 16, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
December 9, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
November 7, 2023Complaint survey2 deficiencies
R-0337Meds administered by authorized staffOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/04/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered safely and in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This affected eight residents (#13, #14, #15, #16, #20, #29, #65, #76) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 105.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 04/23/18. Medical diagnoses included hypertension, hypothyroidism, and depression.

Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 07/07/23. Medical diagnoses included cerebral infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease, and hyperlipidemia.

Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 01/30/23. Medical diagnoses included hypothyroidism, hypertension, depression, and atrial fibrillation.

Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 03/27/23. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, and repeated falls. Review of physician's orders dated 11/03/23 revealed an order for hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic) 25 milligrams (mg) one tablet daily at bedtime and an order for amlodipine 10 mg one tablet daily at bedtime.

Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 09/29/22. Medical diagnoses included osteoarthritis, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, and depression.

Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/02/21. Medical diagnoses included dementia, hypertension and hypothyroidism.

Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 09/29/22. Medical diagnoses included emphysema, hypotension, and muscle weakness.

Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/17/22. Medical diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic pulmonary embolism, and depression.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:07 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 stood at the medication cart on the second floor. On top of the cart was a gray basket with six cups of medications labeled with room numbers.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 8:08 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed she had prepared multiple residents' medications ahead of time, and it was her practice to sign the medications off as administered on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) immediately after she had prepared them.

Observation on 11/07/23 from 8:09 A.M. to 8:23 A.M. of medication administration per LPN #201 revealed the nurse prepared morning medications for Resident #20, Resident #14, Resident #65, Resident #76, Resident #16, and Resident #29. LPN #201 placed a hydrochlorothiazide tablet and an amlodipine tablet in the cup with Resident #76's morning medications, although the physician had ordered these medication to be given at bedtime.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 8:23 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed Resident #76 routinely took his hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine in the morning even though the physician had ordered these medications to be given at bedtime.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:24 A.M. revealed LPN #201 attempted to deliver Resident #20's medications, but Resident #20 was not in her room. LPN #201 then returned to the cart and prepared morning medications for Resident #15.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:26 A.M. revealed LPN #201 entered Resident #15 and Resident #16's room. Resident #15 was seated in a chair in the living room area. LPN #201 sat down her basket containing seven resident's medications on a table next to Resident #15 and filled a cup with water at Resident #15's sink. LPN #201 assisted Resident #16 from a lying position in bed to a seated position on the edge of the bed prior to administering his medications. LPN #201 did not perform hand hygiene and then administered medications to Resident #15. LPN #201 did not perform hand hygiene after administering medications to Resident #15.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:43 A.M. revealed LPN #201 entered Resident #14's room and handed the resident a cup of medications. As Resident #14 began to take her morning pills, a red capsule fell onto the floor. LPN #201 picked the dropped pill off the floor with her ungloved hand and handed the pill to the resident. Resident #14 took all of the medications, including the pill that had dropped to the floor. LPN #201 did not offer to replace the medication. LPN #201 did not perform hand hygiene after administering medications to Resident #15.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 8:45 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed she should not have let Resident #14 take the medication that had been on the ground, nor should she touch medications with her ungloved hand.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:46 A.M. revealed LPN #201 entered Resident #65's room. Resident #65 was lying in bed on top of an incontinent pad. LPN #201 touched Resident #65's legs and back with an ungloved hand while she assisted the resident to a seated position on the edge of the bed. LPN #201 then administered medications to Resident #65. LPN #201 did not perform hand hygiene after administering medications to Resident #65.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:52 A.M. revealed LPN #201 administered medications to Resident #20. LPN #201 did not perform hand hygiene after administering medications to Resident #20.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:55 A.M. revealed LPN #201 administered medications to Resident #76. LPN #201 did not perform hand hygiene after administering medications to Resident #65.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:57 A.M. revealed LPN #201 return to the medication cart on the second floor and retrieved a cup of medications she stated were for Resident #13. LPN #201 administered medications to Resident #13. LPN #201 did not perform hand hygiene after administering medications to Resident #13.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 8:57 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed she had prepared Resident #13's medications earlier in the shift and had already signed out the medications in the MAR.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 9:01 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed she had prepared Resident #29's medication earlier in the shift and needed to go to a different unit to administer the medications. LPN #201 confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene following resident care for the previous medications passed.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 9:04 A.M. revealed LPN #201 entered the memory care unit and administered medications to Resident #29.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 10:45 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed she administered Resident #76's hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine in the morning even though the medications were ordered by the physician to be administered at bedtime.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 11:08 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that at no time should the nurse touch medications with bare hands or allow a resident to ingest a medication after it had fallen onto the floor. Additionally, the DON confirmed LPN #201 should have performed hand hygiene immediately after medication administration to each resident. Further interview confirmed nurses should not pre-pour medications and should document medication administration at the time the medications are given. Interview with the DON confirmed the actions of LPN #201 did not align with the standards of nursing practice.

Review of the policy titled Medication Administration Documentation undated revealed when administering a medication, documentation must include the date, time, medication and dosage on the MAR, and name of the individual administering the medication.

Review of the policy titled Administration of Medication undated revealed medications should be administered to the resident for whom they are prescribed and shall be given in accordance with the directions on the prescription or the physician's orders and shall be recorded on the resident's record.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00146925.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0627Smoking requirements, including electronic smoking device, and vapor productsOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/04/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure no smoking signage was posted on the doors of resident rooms in which oxygen is in use. This affected two residents (#15 and #13) of two reviewed for appropriate no smoking signage. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a portable oxygen cylinder was stored in a safe and secure manner. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The facility census was 105.

Findings include:

1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 09/29/22. Medical diagnoses included emphysema, hypotension, and muscle weakness.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:36 A.M. revealed Resident #15 was sitting in a chair in his room and was wearing supplemental oxygen per concentrator via nasal cannula with oxygen tubing visible from the bedroom area to the living room area. There was no signage placed outside of Resident #15's room which indicated oxygen was in use.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 8:42 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed there was no signage place outside of Resident #15's room which indicated oxygen was in use.

2. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/17/22. Medical diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), chronic pulmonary embolism, and depression.

Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:57 A.M. revealed LPN #201 delivered Resident #13 was sitting on the couch and was wearing supplemental oxygen per concentrator via nasal cannula. There was no signage placed outside of Resident #13's room which indicated oxygen was in use.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 9:00 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed there was no signage place outside of Resident #13's room which indicated oxygen was in use.

3. Observation on 11/07/23 at 8:25 A.M. of the hallway across from the activity office revealed a portable oxygen cylinder was propped up against the medication cart. The oxygen cylinder was not in a rack, cart, or holder.

Interview on 11/07/23 at 8:25 A.M. with LPN #201 confirmed there was an oxygen cylinder propped against the medication cart. LPN #201 further confirmed the oxygen cylinder should have been placed in a proper storage rack.

Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Storage revised August 2017 revealed that oxygen should be secured and stored in a safe environment. The policy identified that oxygen cylinders should be stored in racks or secured by chains.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
October 5, 2023Licensure survey2 deficiencies
R-05513 meals and snackOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/04/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on observation and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide residents with appetizing meals. This affected six residents (#5, #27, #28, #34, #62, and #98) interviewed during mealtimes. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility.

Findings include:

An interview conducted on 10/05/23 at 9:41 A.M. with Resident #5 and Resident #34 revealed Resident #5 stated they repeat the same menu; breakfast was their best meal of the day; their lunch and evening menus are both horrible. There were no seasonings in the food provided to residents. Resident #34 stated the meals they serve were not palatable, and feels the menu was not appropriate because the food served resembles what would be served at a nursing home.

An interview conducted on 10/05/23 at 9:47 A.M. with Resident #98 stated the food from the facility was a disaster and dreadful. All the fruit and vegetables residents received came from cans, and residents are not given adequate protein. Resident #98 said meals served were very poor quality, and something needed to be done about the food.

An interview conducted on 10/05/23 at 12:12 P.M. with Resident #62 stated the food did not taste good. Resident #62 avoided coming down to the dining room area because the food tasted terrible and would rather prepare meals in the apartment.

An interview conducted on 10/05/23 at 12:30 P.M. with Server #23 stated he has had multiple complaints from residents regarding the taste of the food.

An interview conducted on 10/05/23 at 12:40 P.M. with Resident #27 and Resident #28 revealed Resident #27 stated they provide us the same thing every day and repeat the menu. Resident #28 agreed, and stated they do a terrible job with making the food taste good.

An interview was conducted on 10/05/23 at 3:30 P.M. with the Administrator and Resident #98. Resident #98 voiced his concern regarding the food quality at the facility. The Administrator acknowledged Resident #98's complaint stating she was an active member of the facility food service committee. The committee, which consisted of residents and staff in the facility, was making an effort to improve resident meals, and the Administrator explained the menu had improved over the last few months.

A lunch tray was ordered on 10/05/23 at 12:30 P.M. This tray consisted of seasoned mustard greens, butternut squash soup, tomato soup, and steamed rice. Initial observation of the lunch side items resembled the appearance of a mechanical soft diet and did not appear appetizing. The mustard greens were mushy and lacking in flavor. The tomato soup had a dull, tomato juice-like flavor. No complaints were noted on the butternut squash soup and steamed rice.

An interview on 10/05/23 at 12:40 P.M. with Resident #27 stated salt and pepper needed to be added to the mustard greens because they lacked flavor. Resident #27 stated the facility does not add any seasonings because of other residents' special diets.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0563Food texture meets individual needs, except no syringe feedingsOhio citation · correction confirmed 06/04/2024
What the surveyor found

Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to have lids on their garbage cans. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility.

Findings include:

Observation of the kitchen on 10/05/23 at 7:55 A.M. revealed four garbage cans without lids located in the food preparation area during breakfast prep and service.

Interview on 10/05/23 at 8:45 A.M. with Food Services Director (FSD) #58 stated they have never had lids for the garbage cans. The FSD #58 asked Cook #40 if they had any since she started employment at the facility. Cook #40 stated they have not had trash cans with lids in the kitchen since she started employment on 01/10/23.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
July 8, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
March 9, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
December 27, 2022Licensure survey1 deficiency
R-0614Notify director when normal business interruption due to emergency/disasterOhio citation · correction confirmed 10/05/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on fire drill record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to vary the times of fire drills. This had the potential to affect 121 of 121 residents in the facility.

Findings Include:

Review of first shift facility fire drills revealed the following dates and times they were executed: 03/30/22 at 1:30 P.M. and 06/30/22 at 2:00 P.M..

Review of second shift facility fire drills revealed the following dates and times they were executed: 01/31/22 at 3:22 P.M., 04/29/22 at 3:30 P.M., 07/29/22 at 3:40 P.M., and 10/31/22 at 3:30 P.M.

Review of third shift facility fire drills revealed the following dates and times they were executed: 02/28/22 at 5:38 A.M., 05/31/22 at 5:41 A.M., 08/31/22 at 6:16 A.M., and 11/30/22 at 6:11 A.M.

Interview with Property Management Staff #106 on 12/27/22 at 2:35 P.M. confirmed the times that the fire drills were completed. He confirmed they are to vary the times for the fire drills, and confirmed the fire drills that were completed could have been varied more in times.

Review of facility Fire Drills policy, dated 10/08/15, revealed fire drills shall be conducted monthly on alternating shifts, at a minimum each shift per quarter to familiarize facility personnel with the signs and emergency action required under varied conditions.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
September 26, 2022Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.

Resident Satisfaction

2025-2026 survey

Ohio interviews residents directly and publishes the results by area. Scores run from 0 to 100.

82.3Overall satisfaction score
85.5Ohio average
Below Ohio average
AreaThis facility 
Care and services88.9
Caregivers81.1
Environment85.8
Facility culture83.7
Meals and dining83.5
Moving in92.9
Spending time77.3