The most recent inspection on file for Kensington Place took place on May 14, 2026. Across the 19 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 16 deficiencies.
A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.
This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 19 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 8; for the other 11 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 11 of which found none.
Facility Details
Inspections
19 on file · 16 deficienciesMay 14, 2026Complaint survey1 deficiency▼
R-0339Administered meds - given only to and as prescribed▼
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were not pre-poured prior to medication administration. This had the potential to affect 28 residents (#1, #40, #24, #32, #21, #55, #61, #12, #43, #62, #19, #20, #7, #8, #11, #12, #44, #52, #56, #9, #29, #63, #41, #31, #25, #36, #18 and #45) of 28 residents assigned to Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #112 for medication administration. The facility census was 66.
Findings include:
Observation on 05/14/26 at 7:58 A.M. revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #112 administering medications. On top of the medication cart were five medication cups labeled with various resident room numbers. The medication cups contained medications that had been removed from their original packaging prior to administration.
Interview on 05/14/26 at 8:04 A.M. with CMA #112, who reported working at the facility since last year, revealed the staff member identified herself as a medication technician and stated she had been instructed not to speak with state surveyors. The staff member acknowledged that multiple pre-prepared medication cups had been on the medication cart and stated the medications had already been administered. She confirmed that pre-preparing medications was not an acceptable standard practice. When asked to open the medication cart for observation, the staff member refused.
Interview on 05/14/26 at 12:02 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed that pre-preparation of medications is not permitted and is not part of standard nursing practice. The Administrator confirmed that medications must be prepared and administered directly from the original packaging at the time of administration.
Interview on 05/14/26 at 4:50 P.M. with the Director of Nursing confirmed that pre-pouring and preparing medications is not consistent with standard nursing practice or facility policy. The Director of Nursing confirmed medications must be prepared before administration and that staff should not have multiple pre-prepared medication cups on the medication cart at any time.
This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00170326.
This violation is evidence of continued non-compliance from the survey dated 07/08/25.
April 1, 2026Complaint survey3 deficiencies▼
R-0344Prescribed meds kept in locked storage▼
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure medications were secured from unauthorized access. This had the potential to affect three residents (#33, #42 and #59) of 12 residents identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile on the fourth floor. The census was 59.
Findings include:
Observation on 03/26/26 at 8:35 A.M. revealed a medication cart was observed unlocked on the fourth floor with no staff in attendance and no staff were seen on the fourth floor and residents were returning from breakfast. At 8:45 A.M. the surveyor found the Director of Recreation (#285) and she confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and unattended by staff and she locked the medication cart.
Observation on 03/27/26 at 8:10 A.M. on the fourth floor revealed the medication cart was left unattended and unlocked. At 8:14 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #201 returned and verified he had left it unlocked because maintenance was supposed to be working on it because it was not working.
The facility identified three residents (#33, #42, and #59) as being cognitively impaired and independently mobile and would be able to access the unsecured medication cart.
This violation represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number Master Complaint Number OH00170156 and Complaint Number OH00169754.
R-0390Significant change in resident status▼
Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and timely identify a decline in Resident #59's condition thereby delaying treatment and necessary medical care for the resident. In addition, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of the decline in condition. This affected one resident (#59) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 59.
Actual harm occurred on 03/19/26 when Resident #59, who had a diagnosis of dementia with memory loss was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with sepsis, acute kidney failure, high sodium levels, urinary tract infection and an elevated troponin level. Upon physical examination in the hospital the resident's mucous membranes were dry with poor skin turgor (sign of dehydration). Resident #59 required intravenous antibiotics and fluids to treat his condition. Prior to being transferred to the hospital, on 03/03/26 the resident was assessed to be more lethargic. However, the facility failed to provide evidence of ongoing comprehensive monitoring and/or intervention between 03/03/26 and 03/19/26 to prevent hospitalization. The resident was hospitalized until 03/28/26.
Findings include:
Review of the closed medical record for Resident #59 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 09/26/25 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, memory deficit, arteriosclerotic heart disease, functional dyspepsia, and high blood pressure.
Review of Resident #59's service plan dated 10/06/25 revealed the resident had moderate dementia with significant short-term memory and possibly long-term memory loss. Resident #59 required reminders and set up for hair care, washing face, shaving, oral care. Care Staff would report any changes in the resident's ability to provide personal hygiene/oral care. The service plan included the resident demonstrated inappropriate judgment related to safety.
Review of the progress noted dated 03/03/26 at 10:01 P.M. revealed Resident #59 appeared lethargic throughout the shift and was observed having difficulty keeping his eyes open. The note included the resident was weak and fatigued for the majority of the day. All meals were offered; however, he refused to eat. With encouragement the resident was able to drink a Boost (nutritional) supplement, which resulted in slight improvement in alertness, though he remained weak and tired. The note included Resident #59 would continue to be monitored. However, there was no evidence the physician or resident's family was notified of this change in the resident's condition.
Record review revealed no evidence a comprehensive assessment of the resident including vital sign monitoring was completed at this time.
The next progress note dated 03/08/2026 at 9:59 A.M. revealed staff documented Resident #59 appeared to be more energetic this A.M. His eyes were fully open and he was communicative.
Record review revealed no progress notes between 03/08/26 at 9:59 A.M. and 03/18/26 at 2:44 P.M. regarding the resident's status or condition.
Review of a progress note dated 03/18/26 at 2:44 P.M. revealed the nurse received a phone order to crush the resident's medication. However, there was no corresponding information related to why the resident now had to have his medications crushed or evidence of an assessment of the resident's status/condition at this time.
Review of a progress note dated 03/19/26 at 11:15 P.M. revealed the nurse received a call from a Veterans Administration (VA) nurse with a new order for Potassium Chloride 20 milliequivalent (meq) one tablet twice a day. However, there was no corresponding information related to why the medication was ordered or evidence of an assessment of the resident's status/condition at this time.
Record review revealed no evidence of laboratory testing or laboratory results in the resident's medical record.
Resident #59 was transferred to the hospital on 03/19/26. However, there was no information contained in the record or progress notes on 03/19/26 to indicate why he was transferred or what the resident's status/condition was at the time of transfer.
Review of hospital documentation dated 03/19/26 revealed Resident #59 arrived (to the hospital) by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) for altered mental status. EMS reported the resident was at an assisted living facility and was found in bed altered (without evidence of trauma or injury). EMS stated the resident's room did have a strong urine odor. The resident's glucose was 138 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (normal range 70-99 mg/dL). EMS stated they did not know the resident's baseline mentation and neither did the facility. Emergency room staff were unable to gather any history from the resident given his current altered state.
Review of hospital admission documentation revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses of sepsis, altered mental status, acute kidney failure, high sodium levels, urinary tract infection, elevated troponin level and difficulty walking. Physical exam on admission revealed the resident's mucous membranes were dry with poor skin turgor (a sign of dehydration). Resident #59 was started on Vancomycin (antibiotic), Zosyn (antibiotic) and IV (intravenous) fluids. The resident was also assessed to be hyernatremic (high sodium). Additional laboratory testing revealed chloride 133 meq/L (normal 96-106 meq/L) (an abnormal result can indicate dehydration and kidney disease), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 56 mg/dl (normal range 7 to 20 mg/dl) (also indicative of dehydration) and a GFR of 11 ml/min (normal 90-120 ml /min) (also indicative of kidney disease).
On 03/26/26 at 9:40 A.M., interview with Resident #59's daughter revealed her father was still in the hospital but slowly improving. The daughter reported the resident was severely dehydrated upon his admission to the hospital. During the interview the resident's daughter voiced concerns related to the overall care the resident had received and was concerned about the lack of licensed nurses to administer medications and that the Director of Nursing had quit.
On 03/26/26 at 3:44 P.M. interview with the Executive Director (ED) verified there was no documentation to support Resident #59's condition had been monitored (or provided necessary intervention) prior to him being transferred to the hospital. In addition, the ED also verified there was no documentation in the medical record to reflect why the resident was transferred to the emergency room.
On 03/27/26 at 11:15 AM, a telephone interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #206 revealed she worked at night. She stated on 03/19/26 as soon as she came on duty she knew something was going on with Resident #59. The family was present and the resident had a change in condition. LPN #206 spoke to the resident's daughter and a decision was made to transfer the resident to the hospital. The resident was weak and lethargic; he would respond, but he just wasn't with it. The resident had not been eating or drinking, so she thought he was dehydrated. LPN #206 stated she called 911 and after being rerouted on the call, they sent someone out to transfer the resident. During the interview, LPN #206 revealed she had heard the resident was admitted with sepsis and then transferred to large metropolitan trauma hospital for treatment.
Attempts to interview the resident's physician during the investigation were unsuccessful as the physician refused to speak with the surveyor.
Review of the facility undated Change in Condition policy revealed make a notation of the change in the health status and any intervention taken should be noted in the resident's record. Notify the sponsor to be notified. The documentation for this notification would be found in the resident's medical record.
This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00170156.
R-0712Adequate and appropriate treatment and care▼
Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to administer and secure ordered medications. This affected three residents (#3, #40 and #59) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 59.
Findings include:
1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed he was admitted to the facility on 09/26/25. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, memory deficit, arteriosclerotic heart disease, functional dyspepsia, and high blood pressure.
Review of the resident's progress notes revealed the following:
On 02/05/26, and 02/07/26 Paroxetine HCL (antidepressant) 10 milligrams (mg), give 1/2 tablet (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/30/26, 02/03/26, 02/04/26, 02/05/26, 02/07/26, 02/08/26, and 02/10/26 Finasteride (treatment of enlarged prostate) 5 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 02/08/26 Gabapentin (treatment of nerve pain) 100 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/23/26, and 02/22/26 Donepzil (used for treatment of dementia) 5 mg two tablets (receives once a day at bedtime) was unavailable.
On 03/26/26 at 3:44 P.M. interview with the Executive Director revealed potassium did come up missing and they do not know where it went. The Executive Director called the doctor and was going to have the company pay for the missing potassium, but Resident #59 went to the hospital prior to getting the potassium.
Review of the facility documentation revealed on 03/18/26 the missing potassium was reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) by the Executive Director. The potassium was given to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #153 in a brown paper bag from a pharmacy by a friend of the family and then LPN #153 gave it to LPN #166. It was told to the friend they had an order for liquid potassium and if they wanted him to have the pills, a prescription was needed from the physician.
The facility documentation revealed an investigation of nursing areas and all medication carts revealed no bottle of potassium was found. On 03/19/26 the Executive Director revealed LPN #301 was making a call to Resident #59's physician. On 03/20/26 the resident was sent to the hospital.
2. Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on 03/14/13 with diagnoses of atrial fib, PVD, CHF, pressure ulcer of the right hip (Stage III) and cardiomyopathy.
On 01/21/26 Metoprolol ER ( blood pressure medications) 25 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/20/26, and 01/21/26 Multivitamin (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/21/26 Ascorbic Acid 250 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/20/26, 01/21/26 Docusate Sodium (stool softener) 100 mg two capsules (receives twice a day) was unavailable.
On 01/21/26 Simvastin (cholesterol medication) 40 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/21/26, and 01/22/26 Apixaban 5 mg (blood thinner) (receives twice a day) was unavailable.
On 02/04/26, 02/07/26, and 02/08/26 Gabapentin (treatment for nerve pain) 600 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/17/26 and 02/15/26 Melatonin (helps with sleep) 10 mg (receives once a day at bedtime) was unavailable.
On 01/22/26, 01/24/26, 01/25/26, 01/29/26, 02/03/26, and 03/16/26 Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D supplement)25 mcg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/30/26, and 03/16/26 Potassium Chloride 20 meq (milliequivilents) (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 03/24/26 Glucosamine (used for joint health) 750 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 01/19/26 and 03/26/26 Levothyroxine Sodium (thyroid medication) 50 micrograms (mcg) (receives once a day) was unavailable.
3. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on 01/31/20. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, scoliosis, high blood pressure and dementia.
On 02/27/26 Atorvastatin (cholesterol medication) 40 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 03/01/26 Melatonin 5 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
On 02/21/26, 02/22/26, 02/26/26, 03/03/26 PreserVision AREDS (receives twice a day) was unavailable.
On 01/25/26, 01/27/26, 01/28/26, 01/29/26, 01/30/26, 02/18/26, 02/19/26, 02/21/26, 02/23/26, 03/03/26, 03/06/26,03/08/26,03/15/26, 03/18/26, 03/19/26, 03/21/26, 03/22/26, 03/26/26 Fexofedadine (allergy medication) HCL 30 mg (receives once a day) was unavailable.
Interview with the Executive Director on 03/26/26 at 3:44 P.M. verified the medications were documented as unavailable.
This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00170156.
September 3, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
July 8, 2025Licensure survey2 deficiencies▼
R-0339Administered meds - given only to and as prescribed▼
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility to ensure an extended release medication was not crushed prior to administration. This affected one (Resident #38) of two residents reviewed for medications administration. The facility census was 47.
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 09/10/24 with diagnoses of dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
The service plan report dated 09/10/24 revealed a goal to maintain medication management with assistance.
Review of the physician order dated 09/11/24 revealed Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) 24 hours 25 milligrams (mg) one time a day for high blood pressure. There were no instructions on if the medication can be crushed or not crushed.
Observation of medication administration on 07/08/25 at 9:42 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #171 was administering medications to Resident #38. LPN #171 crushed the medications including Metoprolol Succinate extended release 24 hours 25 mg. LPN #171 confirmed all medications including Metoprolol Succinate prepared were appropriate for crushing since this was not specified in the medication administration instructions. LPN #171 confirmed the Metoprolol Succinate was an extended-release tablet.
Interview on 07/08/25 at 1:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Metoprolol Succinate ER was on the do not crush list.
Review of facilities Medications that should not be Crushed dated 04/2025 revealed Metoprolol Succinate tablet modified release should not be crushed.
R-0559Procure, store, prepare, distribute and serve foods▼
Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during kitchen tasks. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents who received food from the kitchen.
Findings include:
Observations on 07/08/25 between 12:04 P.M. and 12:18 P.M. revealed Cook #156 and Cook #147 were actively working on the cooking the food and plating the food on the trayline. During this time, Cook #156 were observed donning clean gloves and reaching directly into a bread bag to retrieve a hamburger bun. While still wearing the same gloves, Cook #156 moved to the grill line, used a spatula to flip meat, and then returned to the prep station, where she handled lettuce, tomato, and onion with gloved hands to assemble the burger. She was further observed opening and closing the cooler cabinet, reaching again into the bread bag for a hot dog bun, and returning to the grill to prepare a hot dog, all without changing gloves. After completing these tasks, Cook #156 removed her gloves, donned a new pair without performing hand hygiene, and wiped her nose with her wrist during the process.
Interview on 07/08/25 at 12:18 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #157 confirmed staff were expected to perform hand hygiene before putting on new gloves and acknowledged that tongs were not required in bread bags when gloves were changed appropriately and hand hygiene was performed. However, DM #157 also stated that when multiple tasks were being conducted, especially in areas with high risk for contamination, such as retrieving produce from the deli fridge or handling multiple food items, tongs should be used to prevent cross-contamination.
Interview on 07/08/25 at 12:20 P.M. with Cook #156 and DM #157 confirmed Dietary Cook #156 should have changed gloves and washed their hands in between each task.
Review of the facilities Infection Control and Handwashing Policies
May 27, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
Resident Satisfaction
2025-2026 surveyOhio interviews residents directly and publishes the results by area. Scores run from 0 to 100.
| Area | This facility | |
|---|---|---|
| Care and services | 88.9 | |
| Caregivers | 81.1 | |
| Environment | 85.8 | |
| Facility culture | 83.7 | |
| Meals and dining | 83.5 | |
| Moving in | 92.9 | |
| Spending time | 77.3 |