6
Inspections on file
4
Deficiencies cited
4
Visits with none
0
Substandard care
0
Immediate jeopardy

The most recent inspection on file for National Church Residences at Hopeton Village took place on February 2, 2026. Across the 6 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 4 deficiencies.

A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.

This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 6 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 2; for the other 4 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 4 of which found none.

Facility Details

Ohio license number
#2585R
County
Ross
Administrator
Jonathon Harrison
Director of nursing
Brandy Garrison
Phone
(740) 773-8107
Ownership
Non Profit - Church Related

Inspections

6 on file · 4 deficiencies
February 2, 2026Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
April 14, 2025Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
October 15, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
June 21, 2024Complaint survey2 deficiencies
R-0391Resident incidents and log; identify resident upon requestOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, review of a police report, detective interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure investigations for allegations of abuse were initiated and thoroughly investigated. This affected one (#8) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 39.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 09/29/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, shortness of breath, and mild intellectual abilities.

Review of the annual assessment dated 03/05/24 revealed Resident #8 was independent with most mobility tasks. Further review of the cognitive assessment dated 03/01/24 revealed the resident had no suspected dementia.

Review of a progress note dated 05/15/24 revealed staff received a complaint that Resident #8 approached a female resident and placed his hands on her back and called her beautiful. The reporting resident stated she was uncomfortable with the encounter. Further review of a progress note dated 05/16/24 revealed the previous Wellness Director spoke with the resident about the allegation on 05/15/24. The note provided no additional information. Lastly, review of a progress note dated 05/19/24 revealed a resident made a complaint to staff of Resident #8 rubbing her shoulders. She stated it made her feel uncomfortable.

Review of the facility's investigations revealed Resident #8 was involved in two investigations:

Investigation dated 05/07/24 revealed Resident #30 was invited to watch a baseball game. During this visit, Resident #30 came to staff and informed them Resident #8 made a sexual advance and asked do you want me to do it. Resident #30 stated he was not that kind of guy. There was no information to indicate what Resident #8 meant when he asked do you want me to do it. The investigation included a statement from Nursing Aide (NA) #58 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #55. The investigation included an interview with Resident #8 but included no statement or interview with Resident #30. Five additional residents were interviewed with no concerns identified with Resident #8. The investigation included no evidence of staff education related to the facility's abuse policy.

Investigation dated 05/15/24 revealed Resident #6 reported Resident #8 touched her shoulders and called her beautiful. She informed staff it made her feel uncomfortable. Staff spoke with Resident #6 and #8 about the incident but no statements were obtained or documented. No staff statements were taken, no other residents were interviewed and no education was provided to staff.

Interview on 06/17/24 at 10:31 A.M. with Executive Director (ED) revealed several months ago the police conducted an investigation related to Resident #8 talking with children on-line. The allegation came from a vigilante child predator group from another state. The ED stated no charges had been filed.

Interview on 06/17/24 at 4:17 P.M. with the Executive Director (ED) and Corporate Nurse (CN) #70 confirmed residents had reported feeling uncomfortable at times with Resident #8, according to progress notes, but those notes did not correspond to investigations. The ED verified the facility did not initiate or complete thorough investigations, including statements from all parties, interviews with residents, resident assessments or staff education on the abuse policy and procedures. The ED confirmed staff should complete a concern form when an incident occurred and not just document in the progress notes, to ensure management was aware and to conduct a thorough investigation.

Interview on 06/18/24 at 9:19 A.M. with Police Detective (PD) #100 revealed in March 2024 he had forwarded a criminal investigation to the county prosecutors office on Resident #8, after an allegation was made by a vigilante child predator group in another state. PD #100 did not provide any specific information related to those allegations. While that investigation was open, he was informed of a new allegation involving Resident #8. Resident #40 alleged Resident #8 fondled her breasts without her consent and called her his girlfriend. While his investigations had been turned over to the prosecutors office, no charges had been filed at this time against Resident #8.

Review of a police report dated 03/12/24 revealed Resident #40 alleged Resident #8 fondled her breasts and referred to her as his girlfriend. The report indicated the resident provided conflicting information on when this occurred and filed the report after receiving information Resident #8 was the focus of a child predator group from another state. PD #100 interviewed Resident #8, who denied the allegation. The report indicated there was no known video of the alleged incident, no witnesses and no physical evidence.

Interview on 06/18/24 at 4:10 P.M. with the ED and CN #74 confirmed allegations of unwanted touching were considered sexual abuse and an investigation should have been completed when Resident #40, who transferred to a skilled nursing facility and no longer resided at the facility, made the allegation of Resident #8 fondling her breasts. The ED and CN #74 verified they were unable to locate any investigations related to allegations made in March 2024 by the child predator group (no specific information related to the allegations) or the allegation involving Resident #8 and Resident #40. The ED and CN #74 also verified the facility did not conduct an investigation for the incident on 05/19/24 involving Resident #8 rubbing another resident's shoulders.

Review of facility policy titled Abuse Neglect and Misappropriation

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0713Requests and inquiries responded to promptlyOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were responded to timely. This affected one (#13) of three residents reviewed for concerns. The facility census was 39.

Findings include

Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 03/31/23. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, heart disease, mood disorder and muscle weakness.

Review of a progress note dated 05/20/24 revealed Resident #13 made a complaint to management related to his bathroom and vents smelling like cigarette smoke. Further review of another progress note dated 05/20/24 revealed the Wellness Director spoke with the resident and stated they would look into it.

Observation on 06/18/24 at 2:45 P.M. of Resident #13's room revealed the bathroom had a faint smell of cigarette smoke.

Interview on 06/18/24 at 3:36 P.M. with Resident #13 revealed he informed the facility approximately one month ago of a cigarette smell in his bathroom, stating he had spoken with a nurse about his concern. Resident #13 denied the odor had stopped or improved since he reported it. Resident #13 stated smoking was not allowed in the building and he believed someone was smoking in their bathroom and the smoke traveled through the vent system.

Interview on 06/18/24 at 4:10 P.M. with the Executive Director (ED) and Corporate Nurse (CN) #74 confirmed the facility had no record of the complaint being on file or any documentation of a resolution or plan to address the concern.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00154282.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
December 18, 2023Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
September 12, 2022Licensure survey2 deficiencies
R-05513 meals and snackOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, document review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to use appropriate serving sizes for the lunch meal. This had the potential to affect all 43 facility residents who eat from the kitchen. The facility census was 43.

Findings include:

Observation on 09/12/22 at 12:05 P.M. revealed Cook #9 starting tray line for the lunch meal. The food being served included sweet and sour pork with a four ounce (oz) serving size scoop, brusell sprouts with a two oz serving size scoop, and rice with a two oz serving size scoop.

Interview with Cook #9 on 09/12/22 at 12:05 P.M. revealed the food and scoop sizes being used included sweet and sour pork with a four ounce (oz) serving size scoop, brusell sprouts with a two oz serving size scoop, and rice with a two oz serving size scoop.

Review of the spreadsheet for Monday week nine on 09/12/22 at 12:10 P.M. revealed sweet and sour pork should be six oz serving. The brusell sprouts,which was a substitute for japanese vegetable medley, should be four oz serving. The rice should be a four oz serving.

Interview with Executive Cook (EC) #14 on 09/12/22 at 12:20 P.M. verified the sweet and sour pork should of been a six oz serving instead of a four oz serving size scoop. The EC verified the brusell sprouts, which was a substitute for japanese vegetable medley, should of been four oz and was only a two oz serving size scoop. The EC also verified the rice should of been a four oz serving and they used a two oz serving size scoop.

Review of a facility policy titled Portion Control Guidelines dated 01/01/16 revealed portion control shall be used to ensure nutritional adequacy of standardized recipes for optimal care and cost control. Portion sizes shall be denoted on standardized recipes, therapeutic diet sheets, and production sheets. Portion control utensils such as scoops,and ladles shall be used during food preparation and services.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0645Resident-activated call systemOhio citation · correction confirmed 12/18/2023
What the surveyor found

Based on staff interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to maintain a call system in good functioning order. This affected one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 43.

Findings include:

Record review of Resident #20 revealed with pertinent diagnoses of chronic neck pain, osteoarthritis of the bilateral knees, chronic pancreatitis, fibromyalgia, hypertension, seizure disorder, cervical spine stenosis, and intrathecal pain pump.

Interview with Resident #20 on 9/12/22 at 11:12 A.M. revealed she had to use the call light last week and it did not register through the walkie talkie to the staff.

Observation on 09/12/22 at 11:14 A.M. revealed, Resident #20 in her room and the Surveyor pulled the call light cords in the bathroom and bedroom and they did not register to the walkie talkie of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 while in the room.

Interview with LPN #13 on 09/12/22 at 11:15 A.M. verified that Resident #20 call light in her bathroom and bedroom were not operable.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules