The most recent inspection on file for Brookdale Pinnacle took place on February 5, 2026. Across the 11 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 4 deficiencies.
A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.
This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 11 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 3; for the other 8 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 8 of which found none.
Facility Details
Inspections
11 on file · 4 deficienciesFebruary 5, 2026Complaint survey2 deficiencies▼
R-0333Personal care services provided appropriately▼
Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide proper incontinent care This affected one (#03) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 65.
Findings Included:
Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on 03/09/24. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis and cerebral atherosclerosis.
Review of the Service Plan Report dated 12/04/24 revealed Resident #03 required bathroom assistance that included managing resident's incontinence products. Resident #03 was unable to use the bathroom on their own and required assistance including pulling down pants, handling toilet paper, wiping, changing protective undergarments and onto and off of the toilet. Resident #03 had urinary incontinence and used incontinent products like pull ups. Resident #03 had bowel incontinence and was unable to stand while using the bathroom. Resident #03 needed additional help because of bowel accidents. Resident #03 needed washed and cleaned up after accidents, and changing of clothes.
Review of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/14/25 revealed that Resident #03 had a BIMS of 11 that indicated he was moderately impaired.
Observation on 02/05/26 from 1:04 P.M. through 1:18 P.M. with Resident #03 who was provided incontinence care with Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #126 and CNA #118. Both CNAs' had turned and repositioned Resident #03 from left to right after pulling his pants down. CNA #126 opened the dirty incontinent brief and verified he was moderately saturated with urine in front of the incontinent brief. CNA #126 took a cleanse wipe and wiped Resident #03's penis shaft, around the bottom, under the scrotum, and never wiped the top of the penis, or pulled the foreskin down to wipe the penile head. CNA #126 finished care and placed a new incontinent brief under him.
Interview on 02/05/26 at 1:15 P.M. with CNA #126 verified she never wiped Resident #03's penis head or pulled back the foreskin to wipe the penis head. CNA #126 also verified that she had not wiped the back of Resident #03's bottom.
Interview on 02/05/26 at 5:00 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the nurses were expected when providing incontinence care for male residents to use a wash cloth or wipes. Start at the top and work your way down the penis shaft. Turn cloth to clean side if necessary during the process. When reaching the bottom of the penis use a new side on the cloth or wipe to clean the scrotum and under. The DON stated this was the proper way for prevention of urinary tract infections.
Review of the facility policy titled Incontinence Care dated 08/2022 revealed that associates will assist with personal continence care as needed by the resident.
Review of the facility policy titled Perineal Care dated 06/22 revealed that the associates should assist with perineal care as needed by the resident. Suggested guidelines included for men, clean the penis starting from the tip toward the bottom. Retract the foreskin if uncircumcised. Return the foreskin to its natural position after rinsing. Then clean the scrotum, while using a clean area of the washcloth or disposable cleansing wipe for each stroke. Rinse and dry all areas. Observe for skin changes, report to the nurse. Apply lotion or powder per resident's preference. Assist resident with undergarments, use of incontinent products. Dispose of soiled linen appropriately. Remove and dispose of gloves. Wash hands.
This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 169160.
R-0711Free from abuse▼
Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected two (#03 and #58) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 65.
Findings Included:
1. Review of medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on 03/09/24. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis and cerebral atherosclerosis.
Review of the fall risk evaluation dated 03/09/24 revealed that Resident #03 had a level three risk of falls due to answering the following: in the past 12 months resident experienced a fall without injury and had fallen 15 times without injury. Resident #03 was incontinent. Resident #03 needed assistance with toileting. Resident #03 had experienced a one fall with injury in last year. Resident #03 had vision deficits, problems ambulating or transferring, and was unsteady. Resident #03 was level three that one or more level three question had a yes response. This indicated that level one to three was scored as level one had mild risk and level three was the highest risk for falls.
Review of the Service Plan Report dated 12/04/24 revealed that Resident #03 required bathroom assistance including managing resident's incontinence of bowel and bladder. Resident #03 was unable to use the bathroom on their own and required assistance.
Review of the Service Plan Report dated 09/11/25 revealed that Resident #03 was at risk for falls. Resident #03's interventions included: consider involvement of physical and occupational therapy, consider resident's pain level, educate resident on reducing environment clutter and arrange furniture for adequate walkways, resident on supplemental lighting including nightlight's, educate resident on the use of comfortable fitted non-slip footwear, encourage the participation in B-Fit programs, be in activities for increase observation, encourage proper use of assistive device as needed, fall interventions also include repositioning, non-skid strips in front of the toilet, non-skid socks or shoes to be worn in the recliner, bedside table to be beside the recliner with the wheels locked, referral to therapy for transfers and safety, educate staff to pick items off floor to prevent falls, educate staff not to transfer resident alone, all transfers in Hoyer lift, assist with toileting after breakfast, urinal to be placed within reach, encourage resident to sleep in his bed, educate resident on importance of utilizing the call light for assistance, dycem placed in recliner, resident night checks increased, keep personal items within safe reach, recliner closer to the wall, and re-educate staff on use of gait belt.
Review of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/14/25 revealed that Resident #3 had a BIMS of 11 that indicated he was moderately impaired.
Observation on 02/05/26 at 11:00 A.M. Resident #03 was lying in his bed dressed in shoes. He had no call light, the phone was dead, and the fall mat was not beside the bed, it was stored in the bathroom. Resident #03 said he does not know why he was here. He said, he used the phone to call the facility for help, but his phone was broken.
Observation and interview on 02/05/26 at 11:05 A.M. with the Executive Director/Licensed Practical Nurse (ED/LPN) who verified Resident #03 was lying in bed and did not have his call light pendent on. The ED/LPN stated Resident #03 used his telephone on the bedside table to call the facility for help. When Resident #03 picked up his phone to see if he could use, he said it's not working. The ED/LPN stated let me see and said, your phone is not charged. The ED/LPN stated you wouldn't be able to call the facility. The ED/LPN verified Resident #03's floor mat was stored in the bathroom, and not on the floor at the bedside. The ED/LPN stated staff were expected to make sure call lights were in reach, the floor mat was on the floor, and making sure residents had no more needs.
2. Review of medical record for Resident #58 revealed she had an admission date of 04/12/23. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, confusion arousals, and initial falls before being admitted.
Review of the fall risk assessment dated 04/12/23 revealed that Resident #58 had a score of level one that indicated she at low risk for falls. Resident #58 had no cognitive decline, was not unsteady when ambulating, had no factors that caused falls, had no injury in last 12 months, but had visual deficits.
Review of the service plan report dated 11/27/25 revealed Resident #58 was at risk for falls. Interventions included be alert to placing resident's personal items within reach, consider annual eye examination, consider involvement with primary care provider and monitor Vitamin D deficiency, consider resident's medications, consider resident's pain level, educate on resident on reducing environmental clutter and arrange furniture for adequate walkways, educate resident on supplemental lighting, resident on use of comfortable, properly fitting non-slip footwear, encourage participation in B-Fit program, use scoop mattress, increase frequency in monitoring, monitor change in status and notify physician for possible urinalysis lab, daughter to consider hospice, familiarize resident to environment, and use Broda chair as mobility aid.
Review of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 12/16/25 revealed that Resident #58 had a BIMS of score of 99 that indicated she was severely cognitively impaired.
Observation on 02/05/26 from 11:50 A.M. through 12:05 P.M. revealed Resident #58 was sitting in her Broda chair with regular socks on her feet. Resident #58's left foot had slid off her Broda chair while in the dining room. Resident #58's left foot hung off the foot pedal.
Interview on 02/05/26 at 12:05 P.M. with Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #145 verified Resident #58 had regular socks on, and her left foot was hanging off the footrest of her Broda chair. CNA #145 verified she was a fall risk, and she was supposed to have non-skid socks or shoes on.
Interview on 02/05/26 at 12:06 P.M. with the Memory Care Director #222 who stated she expected staff to put fall interventions in place that included non-skid socks for Resident #58 to prevent falls.
Review of the facility policy titled Fall Interventions dated 05/24 revealed the facility was to do a fall risk evaluation form for the assisted living and dementia care upon move in or admission to the community to consider residents risk of falls. The residents' level of risk will be scored by level 1, 2, or 3. This indicated that level 1-3 scale had level 1 at low risk, level 2 was moderate risk, and level 3 was highest risk for falls. Residents' fall interventions included floors should be clean and dry, resident bed and wheelchair locked, wear comfortable and fitting non-slide footwear, follow safe handling practices, familiarize residents to the environment, familiarize residents with call system, beds with the lowest position, residents to use handrails in bathroom, and place residents' personal items within reach.
This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 169160.
November 13, 2025Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
July 17, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
May 21, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
February 12, 2025Licensure survey1 deficiency▼
R-0345Labeling of medications▼
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens and eye drops were dated when opened and a controlled medication was not repackaged. This affected fourteen residents (1, 3,7,11,13,19,20,25,33,34,36,38,40, and 43) of 14 residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 48.
Findings include:
1. Observation on 02/12/25 at 11:22 A.M. of the assisted living medication cart revealed opened medications with no open dates for the following medications:
Resident #1 Latanoprost 0.05% eye drop bottle with a dispense date of 11/20/24;
Resident #3 Lumigan 0.01% eye drop bottle, Simbrinza eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained)
Resident #7 Atropine 0.01% eye drop bottle, two lantus long acting insulin pens with the dispense dates of 01/31/25 and 01/10/25;
Resident #13 pataday 0.2% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);
Resident #11 Artificial Tears eye drop bottle with a dispense date of 07/18/24 and two novolog short acting insulin pens with the dispense dates of 01/01/25 and 09/09/24;
Resident #19 Artificial Tears eye drop bottle with the dispense date of 07/18/24;
Resident #20 Artificial tears 1.4 % two eye drop bottles (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained) and
Resident #25 Rhopressa 0.02% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained).
Interview on 02/12/25 at 11:25 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 verified the listed eye drops and insulin pens were not dated when opened in the assisted living medication cart.
2. Observation on 02/12/25 at 11:34 A.M. of the assisted living/memory care medication cart revealed opened medications with no open dates for the following:
Resident #33 prednisone 1% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);
Resident #34 lantus long acting insulin pen (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);
Resident #38 latanoprost 0.0005% two eye drop bottles (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);
Resident #40 Humalog vial with a dispense date of 12/12/24;
Resident #43 ciprofloxacin 0.3% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained)
Resident #36 lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet card had medication taped to slot #24 in the medication bubble card.
Interview on 02/12/25 at 11:35 A.M. with LPN #4 verified eye drops, insulin pens and insulin vial were not dated when opened in the assisted living/ memory care medication cart. Also verified a lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet was taped into slot #24 on the medication bubble card in the narcotic lock box. The LPN shared this was not an appropriate way to store a narcotic in the bubble card.
Interview on 02/12/25 at 1:01 P.M. with the Executive Director revealed she is unsure as to why the eye drops and insulins are undated in the medication carts and they should be dated when opened.
Review of the facility policy titled Medications & Treatments - Labeling Policy Last revised 03/2023 revealed all medications and treatments should be labeled with the necessary information to provide safe medication management administration/ assistance.
Review of the clinical guidelines titled Diabetes Mellitus-Disease Process Management and Insulin Administration Last revised 06/2024 revealed opened insulin vials (vials in use) stored at room temperature or in the refrigerator will last 28 days.