11
Inspections on file
4
Deficiencies cited
8
Visits with none
0
Substandard care
0
Immediate jeopardy

The most recent inspection on file for Brookdale Pinnacle took place on February 5, 2026. Across the 11 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 4 deficiencies.

A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.

This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 11 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 3; for the other 8 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 8 of which found none.

Facility Details

Ohio license number
#2492R
County
Franklin
Administrator
Rainy Pierce
Director of nursing
Leslie Scales
Phone
(614) 277-1200
Ownership
For Profit - Corporation

Inspections

11 on file · 4 deficiencies
February 5, 2026Complaint survey2 deficiencies
R-0333Personal care services provided appropriatelyOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide proper incontinent care This affected one (#03) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 65.

Findings Included:

Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on 03/09/24. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis and cerebral atherosclerosis.

Review of the Service Plan Report dated 12/04/24 revealed Resident #03 required bathroom assistance that included managing resident's incontinence products. Resident #03 was unable to use the bathroom on their own and required assistance including pulling down pants, handling toilet paper, wiping, changing protective undergarments and onto and off of the toilet. Resident #03 had urinary incontinence and used incontinent products like pull ups. Resident #03 had bowel incontinence and was unable to stand while using the bathroom. Resident #03 needed additional help because of bowel accidents. Resident #03 needed washed and cleaned up after accidents, and changing of clothes.

Review of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/14/25 revealed that Resident #03 had a BIMS of 11 that indicated he was moderately impaired.

Observation on 02/05/26 from 1:04 P.M. through 1:18 P.M. with Resident #03 who was provided incontinence care with Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #126 and CNA #118. Both CNAs' had turned and repositioned Resident #03 from left to right after pulling his pants down. CNA #126 opened the dirty incontinent brief and verified he was moderately saturated with urine in front of the incontinent brief. CNA #126 took a cleanse wipe and wiped Resident #03's penis shaft, around the bottom, under the scrotum, and never wiped the top of the penis, or pulled the foreskin down to wipe the penile head. CNA #126 finished care and placed a new incontinent brief under him.

Interview on 02/05/26 at 1:15 P.M. with CNA #126 verified she never wiped Resident #03's penis head or pulled back the foreskin to wipe the penis head. CNA #126 also verified that she had not wiped the back of Resident #03's bottom.

Interview on 02/05/26 at 5:00 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the nurses were expected when providing incontinence care for male residents to use a wash cloth or wipes. Start at the top and work your way down the penis shaft. Turn cloth to clean side if necessary during the process. When reaching the bottom of the penis use a new side on the cloth or wipe to clean the scrotum and under. The DON stated this was the proper way for prevention of urinary tract infections.

Review of the facility policy titled Incontinence Care dated 08/2022 revealed that associates will assist with personal continence care as needed by the resident.

Review of the facility policy titled Perineal Care dated 06/22 revealed that the associates should assist with perineal care as needed by the resident. Suggested guidelines included for men, clean the penis starting from the tip toward the bottom. Retract the foreskin if uncircumcised. Return the foreskin to its natural position after rinsing. Then clean the scrotum, while using a clean area of the washcloth or disposable cleansing wipe for each stroke. Rinse and dry all areas. Observe for skin changes, report to the nurse. Apply lotion or powder per resident's preference. Assist resident with undergarments, use of incontinent products. Dispose of soiled linen appropriately. Remove and dispose of gloves. Wash hands.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 169160.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
R-0711Free from abuseOhio citation
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected two (#03 and #58) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 65.

Findings Included:

1. Review of medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to the facility on 03/09/24. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis and cerebral atherosclerosis.

Review of the fall risk evaluation dated 03/09/24 revealed that Resident #03 had a level three risk of falls due to answering the following: in the past 12 months resident experienced a fall without injury and had fallen 15 times without injury. Resident #03 was incontinent. Resident #03 needed assistance with toileting. Resident #03 had experienced a one fall with injury in last year. Resident #03 had vision deficits, problems ambulating or transferring, and was unsteady. Resident #03 was level three that one or more level three question had a yes response. This indicated that level one to three was scored as level one had mild risk and level three was the highest risk for falls.

Review of the Service Plan Report dated 12/04/24 revealed that Resident #03 required bathroom assistance including managing resident's incontinence of bowel and bladder. Resident #03 was unable to use the bathroom on their own and required assistance.

Review of the Service Plan Report dated 09/11/25 revealed that Resident #03 was at risk for falls. Resident #03's interventions included: consider involvement of physical and occupational therapy, consider resident's pain level, educate resident on reducing environment clutter and arrange furniture for adequate walkways, resident on supplemental lighting including nightlight's, educate resident on the use of comfortable fitted non-slip footwear, encourage the participation in B-Fit programs, be in activities for increase observation, encourage proper use of assistive device as needed, fall interventions also include repositioning, non-skid strips in front of the toilet, non-skid socks or shoes to be worn in the recliner, bedside table to be beside the recliner with the wheels locked, referral to therapy for transfers and safety, educate staff to pick items off floor to prevent falls, educate staff not to transfer resident alone, all transfers in Hoyer lift, assist with toileting after breakfast, urinal to be placed within reach, encourage resident to sleep in his bed, educate resident on importance of utilizing the call light for assistance, dycem placed in recliner, resident night checks increased, keep personal items within safe reach, recliner closer to the wall, and re-educate staff on use of gait belt.

Review of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 11/14/25 revealed that Resident #3 had a BIMS of 11 that indicated he was moderately impaired.

Observation on 02/05/26 at 11:00 A.M. Resident #03 was lying in his bed dressed in shoes. He had no call light, the phone was dead, and the fall mat was not beside the bed, it was stored in the bathroom. Resident #03 said he does not know why he was here. He said, he used the phone to call the facility for help, but his phone was broken.

Observation and interview on 02/05/26 at 11:05 A.M. with the Executive Director/Licensed Practical Nurse (ED/LPN) who verified Resident #03 was lying in bed and did not have his call light pendent on. The ED/LPN stated Resident #03 used his telephone on the bedside table to call the facility for help. When Resident #03 picked up his phone to see if he could use, he said it's not working. The ED/LPN stated let me see and said, your phone is not charged. The ED/LPN stated you wouldn't be able to call the facility. The ED/LPN verified Resident #03's floor mat was stored in the bathroom, and not on the floor at the bedside. The ED/LPN stated staff were expected to make sure call lights were in reach, the floor mat was on the floor, and making sure residents had no more needs.

2. Review of medical record for Resident #58 revealed she had an admission date of 04/12/23. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, confusion arousals, and initial falls before being admitted.

Review of the fall risk assessment dated 04/12/23 revealed that Resident #58 had a score of level one that indicated she at low risk for falls. Resident #58 had no cognitive decline, was not unsteady when ambulating, had no factors that caused falls, had no injury in last 12 months, but had visual deficits.

Review of the service plan report dated 11/27/25 revealed Resident #58 was at risk for falls. Interventions included be alert to placing resident's personal items within reach, consider annual eye examination, consider involvement with primary care provider and monitor Vitamin D deficiency, consider resident's medications, consider resident's pain level, educate on resident on reducing environmental clutter and arrange furniture for adequate walkways, educate resident on supplemental lighting, resident on use of comfortable, properly fitting non-slip footwear, encourage participation in B-Fit program, use scoop mattress, increase frequency in monitoring, monitor change in status and notify physician for possible urinalysis lab, daughter to consider hospice, familiarize resident to environment, and use Broda chair as mobility aid.

Review of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) dated 12/16/25 revealed that Resident #58 had a BIMS of score of 99 that indicated she was severely cognitively impaired.

Observation on 02/05/26 from 11:50 A.M. through 12:05 P.M. revealed Resident #58 was sitting in her Broda chair with regular socks on her feet. Resident #58's left foot had slid off her Broda chair while in the dining room. Resident #58's left foot hung off the foot pedal.

Interview on 02/05/26 at 12:05 P.M. with Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #145 verified Resident #58 had regular socks on, and her left foot was hanging off the footrest of her Broda chair. CNA #145 verified she was a fall risk, and she was supposed to have non-skid socks or shoes on.

Interview on 02/05/26 at 12:06 P.M. with the Memory Care Director #222 who stated she expected staff to put fall interventions in place that included non-skid socks for Resident #58 to prevent falls.

Review of the facility policy titled Fall Interventions dated 05/24 revealed the facility was to do a fall risk evaluation form for the assisted living and dementia care upon move in or admission to the community to consider residents risk of falls. The residents' level of risk will be scored by level 1, 2, or 3. This indicated that level 1-3 scale had level 1 at low risk, level 2 was moderate risk, and level 3 was highest risk for falls. Residents' fall interventions included floors should be clean and dry, resident bed and wheelchair locked, wear comfortable and fitting non-slide footwear, follow safe handling practices, familiarize residents to the environment, familiarize residents with call system, beds with the lowest position, residents to use handrails in bathroom, and place residents' personal items within reach.

This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 169160.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
November 13, 2025Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
July 17, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
May 21, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
February 12, 2025Licensure survey1 deficiency
R-0345Labeling of medicationsOhio citation · correction confirmed 11/13/2025
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens and eye drops were dated when opened and a controlled medication was not repackaged. This affected fourteen residents (1, 3,7,11,13,19,20,25,33,34,36,38,40, and 43) of 14 residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 48.

Findings include:

1. Observation on 02/12/25 at 11:22 A.M. of the assisted living medication cart revealed opened medications with no open dates for the following medications:

Resident #1 Latanoprost 0.05% eye drop bottle with a dispense date of 11/20/24;

Resident #3 Lumigan 0.01% eye drop bottle, Simbrinza eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained)

Resident #7 Atropine 0.01% eye drop bottle, two lantus long acting insulin pens with the dispense dates of 01/31/25 and 01/10/25;

Resident #13 pataday 0.2% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);

Resident #11 Artificial Tears eye drop bottle with a dispense date of 07/18/24 and two novolog short acting insulin pens with the dispense dates of 01/01/25 and 09/09/24;

Resident #19 Artificial Tears eye drop bottle with the dispense date of 07/18/24;

Resident #20 Artificial tears 1.4 % two eye drop bottles (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained) and

Resident #25 Rhopressa 0.02% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained).

Interview on 02/12/25 at 11:25 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 verified the listed eye drops and insulin pens were not dated when opened in the assisted living medication cart.

2. Observation on 02/12/25 at 11:34 A.M. of the assisted living/memory care medication cart revealed opened medications with no open dates for the following:

Resident #33 prednisone 1% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);

Resident #34 lantus long acting insulin pen (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);

Resident #38 latanoprost 0.0005% two eye drop bottles (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained);

Resident #40 Humalog vial with a dispense date of 12/12/24;

Resident #43 ciprofloxacin 0.3% eye drop bottle (the facility discarded before a dispensed date could be obtained)

Resident #36 lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet card had medication taped to slot #24 in the medication bubble card.

Interview on 02/12/25 at 11:35 A.M. with LPN #4 verified eye drops, insulin pens and insulin vial were not dated when opened in the assisted living/ memory care medication cart. Also verified a lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet was taped into slot #24 on the medication bubble card in the narcotic lock box. The LPN shared this was not an appropriate way to store a narcotic in the bubble card.

Interview on 02/12/25 at 1:01 P.M. with the Executive Director revealed she is unsure as to why the eye drops and insulins are undated in the medication carts and they should be dated when opened.

Review of the facility policy titled Medications & Treatments - Labeling Policy Last revised 03/2023 revealed all medications and treatments should be labeled with the necessary information to provide safe medication management administration/ assistance.

Review of the clinical guidelines titled Diabetes Mellitus-Disease Process Management and Insulin Administration Last revised 06/2024 revealed opened insulin vials (vials in use) stored at room temperature or in the refrigerator will last 28 days.

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
January 13, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
August 5, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
June 5, 2024Complaint survey1 deficiency
R-0711Free from abuseOhio citation · correction confirmed 01/13/2025
What the surveyor found

Based on review of medical records, review of a police report, review of an abuse investigation, interviews with staff, residents, Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) #800 and Police Detective #801, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37, #53, #55 and #100, who were cognitively impaired and resided on a memory care unit, were free from sexual abuse by Resident #44 who was also cognitively impaired and had a history of sexually inappropriate behavior. This resulted in Real and Present Danger and the potential for serious physical, mental and/or psychosocial negative outcomes for four residents (#37, #53, #55 and #100) when the facility failed to recognize and respond to Resident #44's increased sexual behavior. Resident #44 was found in Resident #37's bed naked under the covers on 03/09/24. Resident #44 took his pants off and pulled Resident #53 out of bed and then put his hand over her mouth when she was screaming and crying on 03/13/24. Resident #44 was also holding onto Resident #53's arms on 03/13/24. Resident #100 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #53 on 05/16/24 that Resident #44 raped her on the night of 05/15/24. Resident #44 was observed in Resident #55's room with his left-hand covering Resident #55's mouth and his right hand tucked into the front of his sweatpants on 05/18/24. There were no interventions put in place for staff to implement to address Resident #44's behaviors on 03/09/24, 03/13/24, 05/16/24 and 05/18/24 and to prevent further abuse from happening. This affected four (#37, #53, #55 and #100) of four residents reviewed for abuse and placed an additional twelve (#35, #36, #38, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #51, #52, #54, and #56) cognitively impaired female residents residing on the memory care unit of the facility, where Resident #44 had unrestricted access, at risk for further potential sexual abuse. The facility census was 57.

On 05/23/24 at 11:20 A.M., Executive Director (ED) #68 and Health and Wellness Director (HWD) #74 were notified Real and Present Danger began on 03/09/24 after Resident #44 was found in Resident #37's bed naked under the covers on 03/09/24. Resident #44 took his pants off and pulled Resident #53 out of bed and then put his hand over her mouth when she was screaming and crying on 03/13/24. On 05/16/24, Resident #100 reported to LPN #53 on 05/16/24 that Resident #44 raped her on the night of 05/15/24. Resident #44 was observed in Resident #55's room with his left-hand covering Resident #55's mouth and his right hand tucked into the front of his sweatpants on 05/18/24. There were no interventions put in place for staff to implement and/or to address Resident #44's behaviors on 03/09/24, 03/13/24, 05/16/24 and 05/18/24 and/or to prevent further abuse from happening.

The Real and Present Danger was abated on 05/29/24 when the facility implemented the following corrective actions:

On 05/20/24, Resident #44 was admitted to a behavioral health hospital.

On 05/23/24, ED #68 filed a police report regarding the incidents that took place on 03/09/24, 03/13/24 and 05/18/24.

On 05/23/24, ED #68, HWD #74, and Registered Nurse (RN) Care Manager #580 or designee completed resident interviews of all female residents residing in the memory care unit. There were no identified abuse concerns from the interviews with the female residents.

On 05/23/24, ED #68, HWD #74, and RN Care Manager #580 or designee completed skin assessments on all female residents residing on the memory care unit. There were no identified abuse concerns from the skin assessments with the female residents.

Beginning 05/23/24, District Director of Clinical Services (DDCS) #583, District Director of Operations (DDO) #802, and District Clinical Specialist (DCS) #581 or designee audited chart notes of all female residents on the memory care unit to help identify additional residents who may have been impacted by the allegation of noncompliance. The audits were completed on 05/28/24 and there were no identified abuse concerns.

On 05/24/24, ED #68 issued an immediate discharge notice to Resident #44.

On 05/24/24, DDCS #583, and Divisional Director of Memory Care (DDMC) #582 or designee will begin reviewing potential admissions for appropriateness.

Beginning 05/24/24, ED #68, and DDO #802 or designee completed interviews with all associates who had provided care in the affected unit as a measure to help identify additional residents who may have been impacted by the allegation of noncompliance. The interviews will be completed by 05/29/24.

Beginning 05/24/24, ED #68, HWD #74, and RN Care Manager #580 or designee will review the 24-hour report each day for the next 90 days to help identify residents that may present a safety risk. This will be completed on 08/23/24.

Beginning 05/24/24, DDCS #583, and DCS #581 or designee will conduct a site visit monthly for the next ninety days that will include an audit of any incident reports from the prior ninety dates, interviews of five associates, and interviews of five memory care residents to help identify any potential at risk residents. This will be completed on 08/23/24.

Beginning 05/28/24, ED #68, and DCS #581 or designee conducted retraining for all clinical associates and leadership on sexuality and intimacy, abuse and neglect, the Ohio Bill of Rights, and associate obligations, creating a culture of behavior and problem solving and reportable events. The training will be completed by 05/29/24 or staff who have not completed the training will not be permitted to provide resident care until training is completed.

Beginning on 06/22/24, ED #68, HWD #74, and RN Care Manager #580 or designee will interview five female residents weekly for sixty days to verify reports of safety and comfort in their home.

Although the Real and Present Danger was abated on 05/29/24, the violation continues as the facility is still in the process of implementing their corrective action plan and monitoring to ensure on-going compliance.

Findings include:

Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 02/27/24. Diagnoses include other long term drug therapy, frontotemporal dementia, encephalopathy, hypertension, chronic viral hepatitis B with delta agent and depression.

Review of Resident #44's personal service assessment dated 03/13/24 revealed the resident had memory loss and cognitive impairment. Resident #44 had difficulty with orientation to person, place, and time. Resident #44 requires assistance with dressing, grooming, showering, and going to and from the dining room. Resident #44 was independent with toileting.

Review of Resident #44's progress note dated 03/09/24 at 9:53 P.M. revealed the resident was in another resident's (Resident #37) bed naked and with her under her covers. The nurse and three Resident Assistants (RA's) attempted to get the resident from her bed and room. Resident #44 was cursing and kicking. Staff moved the female resident (Resident #37) from her bed to another location.

Review of Resident #44's progress note dated 03/13/24 at 1:27 A.M. revealed the resident was going into other female resident rooms and shaking their shoulders to wake them up out of sleep. Resident #44 was not listening to redirection and Resident #44 pushed on the memory care doors and left to read the visitor book in the lobby of the memory care unit.

Review of Resident #44's progress note dated 03/13/24 at 10:00 P.M. revealed Resident #44 was going into other female resident rooms. When asked to leave the room or when staff tried to redirect Resident #44, the resident became agitated and was swinging his arms. Resident #44 entered a female resident's (Resident #53) room where he took off his pants and pulled her out of bed. The female resident was screaming and crying, and Resident #44 then put his hand over her mouth. Resident #44 was holding onto the female resident by her arms. The RA tried to redirect Resident #44 but was unsuccessful. The RA called the nurse and when the nurse approached the situation, Resident #44 and the female were standing in the hallway fully clothed. The female resident was still screaming, and the nurse tried to redirect the resident but was not successful. The nurse was able to remove Resident #44 from the female's room where he became agitated and aggressive. Resident #44 refused as needed medications. The Power of Attorney (POA) and HWD #74 were made aware.

Review of Resident #44's progress notes from 05/15/24 to 05/17/24 revealed no information related to Resident #100 alleging Resident #44 raped her at the facility on 05/15/24.

Review of Resident #44's progress note dated 05/18/24 at 8:09 P.M. revealed the resident was observed in another resident's (Resident #55) room at approximately 8:00 P.M. with his left hand covering the female resident's mouth. Resident #44 had his right hand tucked into the front of his sweatpants. The caregivers redirected Resident #44, and the resident exited the room immediately.

Review of Resident #44's progress note dated 05/19/24 at 10:00 P.M. revealed the RA told the nurse that Resident #44 punched her in the left side of her face. Resident #44 was inside another resident's room going through her things when she was asking him to get out and he would not leave. Two RA's were trying to redirect Resident #44 out of the other resident's room when Resident #44 punched and grabbed the RA. This was reported to HWD #74 and the POA.

Review of Resident #44's progress note dated 05/20/24 at 9:07 A.M. revealed the nurse attempted to redirect the resident into his room due to him continuously going into multiple resident rooms and causing a disturbance. Resident #44 punched the nurse with his right fist on the left side of her face and stated you expletive term. HWD #74 was notified.

Review of Resident #44's progress note dated 05/20/24 at 8:00 P.M. revealed Resident #44 was noted with physical aggressive behaviors toward staff. Resident #44 was more agitated when staff attempted to redirect Resident #44 out of other resident rooms. Resident #44 continued to refuse medication. Staff spoke to the physician regarding medication changes and a possible psychiatric stay. Resident #44 was transported to the psychiatric hospital and the POA was notified.

Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 08/27/18. Diagnoses include major depressive disorder and unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety.

Review of Resident #37's personal service assessment dated 12/28/23 revealed the resident had memory loss and cognitive impairment. Resident #37 had difficulty with orientation to person, place, and time. Resident #37 required assistance with dressing, grooming, toileting, showering, and going to and from the dining room.

Review of Resident #37's progress notes from 01/01/24 to 05/22/24 revealed no information related to Resident #44 being found in Resident #37's bed naked under the covers on 03/09/24.

Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 04/12/23. Diagnoses include confusional arousals, and vascular dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety.

Review of Resident #53's personal service assessment dated 03/15/24 revealed the resident had memory loss and cognitive impairment. Resident #53 had difficulty with orientation to person, place, and time. Resident #53 required assistance with dressing, grooming, toileting, showering, and going to and from the dining room.

Review of Resident #53's progress notes from 01/01/24 to 05/22/24 revealed no information related to Resident #44 taking his pants off, pulling Resident #53 out of bed and/or putting his hand over Resident #53's mouth when she was screaming and crying on 03/13/24. Resident #53's progress notes also had no information regarding Resident #44 holding onto Resident #53's arms on 03/13/24.

Review of Resident #100's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 05/15/24. Diagnoses include major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, old myocardial infarction, and chronic pain. Resident #100 discharged from the facility on 05/17/24.

Review of Resident #100's personal service assessment dated 05/15/24 revealed the resident had memory loss and cognitive impairment. Resident #100 had difficulty with orientation to person, place, and time. Resident #100 was independent with dressing, grooming, showering, and toileting. Resident #100 required assistance with going to and from the dining room and community activities.

Review of Resident #100's progress note dated 05/15/24 revealed the resident arrived at the facility at 2:20 P.M. and was admitted. Resident #100 was shown her room and became very sad when she saw her bed and rocking chair. Resident #100 wanted to know how long she was going to be there.

Review of Resident #100's progress note dated 05/17/24 revealed the resident's sister and daughter arrived at the facility very hostile and speaking loudly and negatively to the nurse. They stated that Resident #100 was not returning to the community and demanded her medications and reported Resident #100's other daughter that was the POA relinquished her POA at the hospital stating she was done and could not deal with her. Staff asked if she was the alternative POA listed on the documents, and she stated she was not the alternate POA. Staff explained that they would need to contact the POA directly before releasing any information or medication. Staff called the POA, and she stated it was okay to release the medication and information to them and stated, give them what they want. Resident #100's POA stated she had not relinquished her POA yet and felt it would be better for the facility not to deal with her family. The POA stated she believed that Resident #100 wanted to leave the facility and go home and will state whatever she needed in order for her to do so. Medications were released with current medication orders, and she stated they would be there sometime that weekend to move Resident #100's belongings out of the facility. Resident #100's door was locked per family request.

Review of Resident #100's medical record from 05/15/24 to 05/17/24 revealed there was no documentation related to Resident #100's allegedly being raped by Resident #44 at the facility on 05/15/24.

Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on 06/28/22. Diagnoses include unspecified dementia unspecified severity with behavioral disturbance, heart failure, hyperlipidemia, polycystic ovarian syndrome, cramp and spasm and Vitamin D deficiency.

Review of Resident #55's personal service assessment dated 04/12/24 revealed the resident had memory loss and cognitive impairment. Resident #55 had difficulty with orientation to person, place, and time. Resident #55 required assistance with dressing, grooming, toileting, and going to and from the dining room. Resident #55 did not require assistance with showering.

Review of Resident #55's progress notes from 01/01/24 to 05/22/24 revealed no information related to Resident #44 being observed in Resident #55's room with his left-hand covering Resident #55's mouth and his right hand tucked into the front of his sweatpants on 05/18/24.

Review of the redacted police report dated 05/17/24 revealed the incident occurred on 05/15/24 from 9:30 P.M. to 05/16/24 at 8:30 A.M. HWD #74 contacted the police to report a resident (Resident #100) there alleged another resident (Resident #44) raped her. HWD #74 stated LPN #53 was with the resident when she said, the man in the red shirt raped me. HWD #74 stated the suspect was a resident who also resided in the memory care unit. HWD #74 and Memory Care Program Director (MCPD) #75 spoke with the resident since she began staying at the facility to see how she was doing. HWD #74 and MCPD #75 stated that the resident made several comments about not wanting to be at the facility. HWD #74 and MCPD #75 wrote witness statements saying the resident told them the other resident had been in her room, but the resident did not make the allegation of rape to them. The officer spoke to the resident about the allegation and the resident stated she went to bed about 9:30 P.M. on 05/15/24 and during the night she found the other resident lying with her. The resident said she told the other resident to get the hell out but he would not leave. When asked what the other resident did to her, she stated he raped her by penetrating her. The resident was transported to the hospital by private ambulance for treatment and examination. The detective responded to the facility and spoke with HWD #74 and MCPD #75. There was no scene to process and no further leads, evidence, or witnesses.

On 05/22/24 Resident #100's hospital medical records were requested but were not received during the survey.

Review of the facility's investigation dated 05/17/24 revealed HWD #74 checked on Resident #100 as she was a new resident, and it was her first night at the facility on 05/16/24 at 7:40 A.M. HWD #74 asked how her night was, and Resident #100 stated it was not good. HWD #74 asked what happened and Resident #100 stated a man came into her room two times and the first time he ate her cookies and the next time she woke up and he was laying in her bed. HWD #74 stated she told him to get the hell out. HWD #74 asked if he hurt her, but Resident #100 stated no, and she just told him to get the hell out. Resident #100 reported she was raped by another resident on 05/16/24 at 9:00 P.M. HWD #74 was notified, and an investigation was started. Police were notified and Resident #100 was sent to the hospital for examination. Resident #100 was then interviewed with HWD #74 and MCPD #75 after the allegation was reported on 05/17/24 at 9:30 A.M. HWD #74 stated HWD #74 and MCPD #75 wanted to talk to Resident #100 about what she told the nurse last night and Resident #100 replied I was raped. HWD #74 told her she would have to be sent out for a medical evaluation and the police would have to come. MCPD #75 asked if he took her clothes off and Resident #100 stated that she only slept in a T-shirt and underwear. The police then came and interviewed the resident.

Review of the facility's investigation dated 05/17/24 revealed LPN #53 was interviewed on 05/16/24 at 9:00 P.M. LPN #53 stated that it was reported to her that Resident #100 stated she was raped. LPN #53 notified HWD #74 and helped Resident #100 back to her room and got her in her bed. LPN #53 explained there was a lock on her door so no one would be able to get in if they did not have a key.

Review of the facility's investigation dated 05/17/24 revealed RA #49 was interviewed on 05/16/24 at 10:30 P.M. RA #49 stated Resident #100 came to the main area in the memory care unit on 05/15/24 and stated there was a man in her room and she asked if she could remove him. RA #49 went to Resident #100's room and noticed that Resident #44 was in her room going through her things. RA #49 asked Resident #44 to leave and he did.

Interview with ED #68 on 05/22/24 at 9:59 A.M. revealed she was out of the facility on leave at the time Resident #100 alleged Resident #44 raped her at the facility on 05/15/24 and she did not have any details regarding the incident.

Interview with MCPD #75 on 05/22/24 at 10:09 A.M. revealed Resident #100 moved into the facility on 05/15/24. MCPD #75 stated she met with Resident #100's POA early in the morning on 05/16/24 and Resident #100's POA stated Resident #100 was upset with her because she did not want to be at the facility. MCPD #75 stated she went down to Resident #100's room and the resident's POA stayed outside the room, and she asked the resident how her night was because the resident's POA wanted her to diffuse the situation before she visited. MCPD #75 stated that Resident #100 stated there was a man (Resident #44) in her room overnight and she told him to get the hell out. MCPD #75 reported Resident #100 told her that the resident was walking around and eating her snacks. MCPD #75 stated that Resident #100 then asked about her POA and her POA came in the room. MCPD #75 reported Resident #100 did not tell her about the rape allegation when she spoke with her the morning of 05/16/24 and she also did not tell her POA who visited on 05/16/24 or HWD #74 who also visited on 05/16/24. MCPD #75 stated Resident #100 later told the night shift nurse while she was seated in the common area You see that guy over there? He raped me. MCPD #75 stated that Resident #100 was referring to Resident #44 as the guy who raped her. MCPD #75 stated Resident #44 was a Caucasian male and there were no cameras on the unit.

Telephone interview on 05/22/24 at 11:10 A.M. with SANE #800 revealed she examined Resident #100 at the hospital on 05/17/24. SANE #800 reported Resident #100 told her that a black man that was younger than her raped her. SANE #800 stated that Resident #100 had no obvious tearing but did have a small abrasion to the labia which could have been caused by wiping. SANE #800 reported the majority of sexual assault victims did not have signs of trauma. SANE #800 stated Resident #100 originally declined a rape kit but then changed her mind and one was completed. SANE #800 reported the rape kit could take six months to one year to be processed.

Observation of the facility on 05/22/24 at 11:14 A.M. revealed Resident #53 was ambulating independently and wandering the hallway on the memory care unit. Resident #53 was clean and dressed appropriately.

Attempts to interview Resident #53 on 05/22/24 at 11:14 A.M. revealed the resident was not able to provide any information due to cognition.

Interview with HWD #74 on 05/22/24 at 11:25 A.M. revealed Resident #100 moved into the facility on 05/15/24. HWD #74 stated she came in early on 05/16/24 and she went to Resident #100's room around 7:40 A.M. because staff reported Resident #100 did not have a good night and she did not go to breakfast. HWD #74 stated Resident #100 told her that there was a resident (Resident #44) in her room eating her snacks and then tried to sleep in her bed. HWD #74 stated she told him to get the hell out and he did not get out at first but eventually did get out. HWD #74 stated she told Resident #100 that a lock was ordered for her door and would be placed on her door that day. HWD #74 reported Resident #100 did not have a lock on her door on the night of 05/15/24. HWD #74 stated Resident #100 wanted to know when she was going to be able to go home and she continually asked about leaving throughout the day. HWD #74 reported Resident #100's daughter came to visit on 05/16/24 at around 8:00 A.M. HWD #74 stated Resident #100 told LPN #53 You see that guy over there in the red shirt. He raped me last night on 05/16/24. HWD #74 reported she was informed of the allegation on 05/16/24 and she called Resident #100's POA and informed her. HWD #74 stated the facility offered to send Resident #100 out to the hospital on 05/16/24 but she refused, and Resident #100 was sent out to the hospital by private ambulance on 05/17/24 at 10:30 A.M. HWD #74 stated she also notified the police of Resident #100's rape allegation on 05/17/24 at 9:20 A.M. HWD #74 stated she spoke with Resident #100's POA on 05/17/24 and Resident #100's POA felt that Resident #100's family members had put things in her head. HWD #74 also reported she interviewed Resident #100 on 05/17/24 and she reported she only slept in a T-shirt and underwear and Resident #44 raped her. HWD #74 stated Resident #44 was not placed on one-on-one checks after the allegation was made on 05/16/24 but Resident #44 mostly stayed in his room. HWD #74 reported Resident #44 was later sent out to the psychiatric hospital on 05/20/24 for hitting staff members.

Telephone interview with LPN #53 on 05/22/24 at 11:55 A.M. revealed Resident #100 told her Do you see that man over there in the red shirt? He raped me last night on 05/16/24 at approximately 10:00 P.M. LPN #53 reported Resident #100 told her that Resident #44 took his clothes off and then took her clothes off and raped her. LPN #53 stated she asked Resident #100 if she wanted to go to the hospital and she declined but she stated she wanted to talk to the police department. LPN #53 stated she reported the allegation to HWD #74.

Telephone interview with RA #49 on 05/22/24 at 12:02 P.M. revealed she was sitting in the common area on night shift on 05/15/24 and Resident #100 came out of her room and stated a man was in her room. Resident #100 told RA #49 that she tried to get the man to leave but he would not leave. RA #49 stated she went to Resident #100's room and found Resident #44 was in her room going through her stuff. RA #49 stated that she told Resident #44 that it was not his room and he told her to expletive off and drew his fist at RA #49. RA #49 stated he was able to get Resident #44 out of Resident #100's room, but RA #49 did not ask if Resident #100 was hurt. RA #49 stated Resident #100 was wearing a robe and night gown and did not appear in distress.

Telephone interview with Police Detective #801 on 05/22/24 at 12:35 P.M. revealed he was investigating Resident #100's allegation that she was raped by Resident #44. Police Detective #801 stated Resident #100's rape kit was sent off, but it would take months to get back. Police Detective #801 stated Resident #100 had a lot of family conflict.

Telephone interview with LPN #29 on 05/22/24 at 4:09 P.M. revealed she was called to Resident #53's room on 03/13/24 by a RA. LPN #29 stated that Resident #44 was standing behind Resident #53 with his pants down and his hand covering her mouth when LPN #29 arrived at the room. LPN #29 reported Resident #44 was telling Resident #53 to be quiet and shut up. LPN #29 stated she got between the residents and Resident #44 pulled his own pants up. LPN #29 reported she felt the incident was sexually motivated and that she had heard that Resident #44 had a history of sexual behaviors such as being found asleep naked in female resident beds or taking female residents out of their bed. LPN #29 stated she reported the incident to HWD #74.

Telephone interview with RA #260 on 05/22/24 at 4:17 P.M. revealed she was changing a resident in another room on 05/18/24 when she heard yelling. RA #260 stated she found Resident #55 in her bed trying to yell. RA #260 reported Resident #44 had his left hand over Resident #55's mouth and had his right hand in his pants grabbing at his penis. RA #260 stated Resident #44 told Resident #55 I'm coming back repeatedly. RA #260 reported she felt the incident was sexually motivated and she reported it to HWD #74 and the nurse on duty. RA #260 stated Resident #44 was not on one-on-one, or any type of checks and she was not aware of the rape allegation made by Resident #100 on 05/16/24.

Interview with Resident #45 on 05/22/24 at 4:39 P.M. revealed Resident #44 used to bang on her door all night and try to get in, but she kept her door locked. Resident #45 stated he would sit on the edge of her bed when he came in the room, and everyone was afraid of him. Resident #45 stated she was afraid of Resident #44 and staff had told her that Resident #44 may return to the facility.

Observation of the facility on 05/23/24 at 9:05 A.M. revealed Resident #37 was sitting at the dining room table. Resident #37 was clean and dressed appropriately.

An attempt to interview Resident #37 on 05/23/24 at 9:05 A.M. revealed the resident was not able to provide any information due to being cognitively impaired.

Observation of the facility on 05/23/24 at 9:07 A.M. revealed Resident #55 was sitting at the dining room table. Resident #55 was clean and dressed appropriately.

An attempt to interview Resident #55 on 05/23/24 at 9:07 A.M. revealed the resident was not able to provide any information due being cognitively impaired.

Interview with HWD #74 on 05/23/24 at 11:05 A.M. verified she was informed of Resident #44's sexual behavior towards other residents on 03/09/24, 03/13/24 and 05/18/24 but no formal investigation was completed. HWD #74 stated Resident #44 was placed on increased checks but stated they did not do them at a specific time frame, and she was not able to provide dates, times, or any documentation on when the checks were completed. HWD #74 verified the police were not contacted or notified of the incidents on 03/09/24, 03/13/24 or 05/18/24. The facility confirmed there were twelve (#35, #36, #38, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #51, #52, #54, and #56) additional cognitively impaired female residents residing on the memory care unit of the facility, where Resident #44 had unrestricted access and who were at risk for potential sexual abuse.

Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - residential care rules
March 14, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
January 18, 2024Licensure survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
December 15, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.