The most recent inspection on file for Walnut Creek Care Community took place on May 11, 2026. Across the 17 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 26 deficiencies.
A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.
This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 17 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 12; for the other 5 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 5 of which found none.
Facility Details
Inspections
17 on file · 26 deficienciesMay 11, 2026Complaint survey1 deficiency▼
R-0559Procure, store, prepare, distribute and serve foods▼
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 86 residents.
Findings include:
Observation on 05/11/26 at 8:50 A.M. of a test tray at breakfast after all residents in the dining room had been served, revealed the sausage patty, eggs, and grits were cold to taste. The sausage temperature was 96.8 degrees Fahrenheit (F), eggs were 101.6 degrees F, and grits were 130 degrees F.
Interview on 05/11/26 at 8:55 A.M. with Dietary Aide (DA) #300 verified the food temperatures were not hot enough. DA #300 stated he looked for food temperatures to be at 165 degrees F at the start of meal service.
Interview on 05/11/26 at 9:39 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #305 confirmed foods should measure 145-150 degrees F when it is served to the residents. DM #305 stated he suspected nobody had turned on the warming wells during the breakfast meal.
Interviews on 05/11/26 between 8:53 A.M. and 11:15 A.M. with Residents #17, #42, #60, and #61 confirmed the food at breakfast on 05/11/26 was served cold. All residents indicated the food was frequently served cold.
Review of the facility policy titled Food Temperatures dated 2021 revealed all hot food items must be cooked to appropriate internal temperatures, held, and served at a temperature of at least 135 degrees F.
This violation represents noncompliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00170471.
February 19, 2026Complaint survey2 deficiencies▼
R-0559Procure, store, prepare, distribute and serve foods▼
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and kitchenettes were maintained in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected 84 residents who the facility identified as receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84.
Findings include:
Observation of Memory Care Unit (MCU) kitchen on 02/18/26 at 8:58 A.M. with Dietary Cook (DC) #250, revealed the dishwasher was not working and in need of repair. The MCU kitchen floor was heavily soiled with brown build up on the tile and grout of the kitchen floor along the wall and under the appliances. There was black substance on the plastic ledge on the inside of the ice machine. Interview with DC #250 at the same time verified the conditions of the MCU kitchen. DC #250 stated the dishwasher needed to be fixed.
Observation of the main kitchen on 02/18/26 at 9:02 A.M. with Dietary Cook (DC) #251 revealed the walk refrigerator contained two large pies that were not labeled or dated. A block of American cheese was opened and wrapped in plastic with no label or date. Three large bags of shredded cheese opened with no label or date. An open carton of liquid eggs with no label or date. A gallon bag of tomatoes, a gallon bag of lettuce, and a gallon bag of sliced onions were all identified with no label or date. A large bag of whipped cream opened with no label or date. An outdated bag of buns dated 02/13/26 by manufacturer with no label and a large bag of buns with no label or date. The dishwasher was heavily soiled, and dust was hanging from numerous areas. All the kitchen ceiling vents in the kitchen were heavily soiled, rusted and dust hanging from them, which included vents directly over the food preparation areas. The ice machine had brown spotted substances along the top over the ice. The floor was heavily soiled around the appliances with scattered debris. The refrigerator under the drink preparation area had a personal size soda opened with no label or date. There were three refrigerators that were not working. Interview with DC #51 at the same time verified the conditions of the kitchen including the three refrigerators not working. DC #251 stated the refrigerators had been broken for approximately three months.
Observation of the third facility kitchen called the T2 kitchen on 02/18/26 at 9:25 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #252, revealed a dishwasher that was out of order. The refrigerator contained two large salads covered with plastic no label, an opened pie with no label. The ice machine was heavily soiled on the plastic lid of the ice machine. The vents throughout the kitchen were very heavily soiled with debris and fuzzy dust. The floor throughout the kitchen along with walls and around the appliances were heavily soiled. DM #252 verified the conditions of the T2 kitchen, DM #252 stated the dishwasher in the MCU, the dishwasher in T2 kitchen, and the three refrigerators in the main kitchen have been out of order for greater than three months.
Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage, dated 2021 revealed food would be stored in an area that is clean, dry, and free from contamination or cross contamination. All foods should be covered, labeled, dated, and routinely monitored to ensure that foods, including leftovers, would be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen, or discarded. The leftover food should be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely and clearly labeled and dated before refrigerated and the leftover food must be used within seven days. All refrigerators should be kept clean and in good working condition at all times.
Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Sanitation of Dining and Food Services Areas policy, revealed the food and nutrition services staff would maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of dining and food service areas.
R-0801Content of resident record; review and update of contact information▼
Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This affected one (Resident #51) out of three residents revived. The facility census was 84.
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed she was admitted to the facility on 12/18/25. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), cocaine dependence, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes mellitus (DM), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease, adjustment disorder with anxiety, and major depressive disorder.
Review of the service plan assessment for Resident #51 dated 01/23/26, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with mild short-term memory deficient. Resident #51 required assistance from staff with meal preparation, and assistance with activities of daily living. Resident #51 was dependent on staff for medication administration.
Review of the census information for Resident #51 verified she was discharged from the facility on 02/07/26 and readmitted to the facility on 02/17/26.
Review of the progress notes for Resident #51 reveled nothing documented related to her discharge from the facility on 02/07/26, hospital admission and no documentation of her being readmitted to the facility on 02/17/26.
Review of the Assisted Living (AL) readmission assessment dated 02/17/26 revealed the general information section was blank, the medical information was blank, the assessment portion was partially completed, the notes were blank, and the skin assessment was blank. The readmission note had the word error across the top and was not signed or dated.
During an interview on 02/19/26 at 9:27 A.M., Resident #51 stated on 02/07/26 she felt very ill. Resident #51 stated she attempted to call the nurse and waited for a response for approximately forty-five minutes. Resident #51 stated when no staff member would address her call light, she called 911 herself and was taken to the emergency room for evaluation and was admitted to the hospital.
During an interview on 02/19/26 at 10:09 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #51 called 911 on 02/07/26 and was taken to the emergency room for evaluation and was admitted. The DON stated Resident #51 was discharged from the hospital on 02/09/26 and admitted to a Skilled Nursing Facility then readmitted to the AL on 02/17/26. The DON verified the facility failed to document in Resident #51's medical chart when the resident was discharged to the hospital and when she was admitted. The DON verified the facility failed to complete an appropriate readmission nursing assessment on 02/17/26. The DON stated readmission nursing assessments should be completed on all residents the day they return from a hospital or another skilled nursing facility. The DON verified the facility failed to obtain the discharge orders and discharge summary for Resident #51 when she returned to the facility on 02/17/26.
Review of the facility policy titled, Record Retention for All AL Residents Policy, undated, revealed the facility would maintain accurate and complete medical records as ordered by law.
February 3, 2026Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
January 7, 2026Complaint survey2 deficiencies▼
R-0339Administered meds - given only to and as prescribed▼
Based on record review, staff interviews and observation, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected four Residents (#60, #25 #30 and #31) out of the six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 89.
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 09/14/25. Diagnosis included anxiety, diabetes schizophrenia, Guillain Barre Syndrome, hydrocephalus, hypertension, gastroparesis, and neurogenic bladder
Review of the functional assessment for Resident #60 dated 12/12/25, revealed the resident was dependent on staff for medication administration.
Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 08/25/25. Diagnosis included atrial fibrillation, diabetes, congestive heart failure, bipolar disorder, and hypertension
Review of the functional assessment for Resident #25 dated 10/31/25, revealed the resident was dependent on staff for medication administration.
Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 10/10/24. Diagnosis included anxiety, hypothyroidism, diabetes, obesity, Guillain Barre, non-pressure hydrocephalus, gastroparesis and neurogenic bladder.
Review of functional assessment for Resident #30 dated 12/12/25, revealed the resident was dependent on staff for medication administration.
Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 05/14/25 and a discharge date of 12/30/25. Diagnosis included chronic kidney disease stage 3, depression, lower extremity thrombophlebitis, encephalopathy, congestive heart failure, and dysphagia.
Review of assessment for Resident #31 dated 05/14/25, revealed the resident was dependent on staff for medication administration.
Observation of medication administration for Resident #60 on 12/30/25 at 9:45 A.M., revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #81 was unable to administer three medications (midodrine [used to treat symptomatic orthostatic hypotension/low blood pressure], linaclotide [used to treat bowel conditions], and benztropine [used to treat symptoms of Parkinson's disease and to control movement disorders]) to Resident #60. LPN #81 stated the medications were not available due to not being delivered from the pharmacy. LPN #81 verified the resident was not administered the medications as ordered.
Continued observation of medication administration for Resident #25 on 12/30/25 at 9:50 A.M., revealed LPN #81 was unable to administer one medication (Dofetilide [antiarrhythmic medication]) to the resident. LPN #81 stated the medications were not available due to not being delivered from the pharmacy. LPN #81 verified the resident was not administered the medications as ordered.
Continued observation of medication administration for Resident #30 on 12/30/25 at 9:55 A.M., revealed LPN #81 was unable to administer one medication (Robaxin [muscle relaxant medication] to the resident. LPN #81 stated the medications were not available due to not being delivered from the pharmacy. LPN #81 verified the resident was not administered the medications as ordered.
Continued observation of medication administration for Resident #31 on 12/30/25 at 9:50 A.M., revealed LPN #81 was unable to administer two medications (Vitamin D-3 [vitamin D deficiency], Folic Acid [anemia] to the resident. LPN #81 stated the medications were not available due to not being delivered from the pharmacy. LPN #81 verified the resident was not administered the medications as ordered.
Interview with LPN #81 on 12/30/25 at 10:07 A.M., revealed the facility changed pharmacies as of 12/15/25 and they have struggled daily to have the ordered medications they need to administer to the residents. LPN #81 stated she has called the pharmacy numerous times over other medication orders.
Interview with Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator on 12/30/25 at 3:35 P.M., stated the facility has struggled with pharmacy issues and getting medications delivered since switching to a new pharmacy on 12/15/25. The DON stated he has been working with pharmacy daily to work out the supply issues. The DON and Administrator verified there have been other times when ordered medications were not available.
This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00168941 and OH00168981.
R-0559Procure, store, prepare, distribute and serve foods▼
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and kitchenettes were maintained in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This affected 89 residents who the facility identified as receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 89.
Findings include:
Observation of the facility's kitchen on 12/30/25 at 11:07 A.M., revealed Cook #47 was putting away the clean dishes. Cook #47 was not wearing a hair net. Further observation of the kitchen revealed there was a red sanitizer bucket next to the three-compartment sink. The sanitizer bucket was observed to have bubbles in it and the sanitizer bucket was sitting next to a bottle of blue dish soap. Observation of Dietary Manager (DM) #79 testing the sanitizer solution in the sanitizer bucket, revealed the sanitizer solution was zero parts per million (ppm).
Interview on 12/30/25 at 11:07 A.M., Cook #47, verified she was not wearing a hair net while putting away clean dishes in the kitchen.
Interview with DM #79 on 12/30/25 at 11:07 A.M., verified the sanitizer solution in the red sanitizer bucket next to the three-compartment sink was zero ppm.
Observation of the kitchenette on the Memory Care Unit (MCU) on 12/30/25 at 11:17 A.M. with DM #79, revealed there was brown build up on the tile and on the grout of the kitchen floor. There was a black substance on the plastic ledge on the inside of the ice machine and a gray fuzzy substance on the vent on the front of the ice machine. The black substance was observed to wipe off of the inside ledge of the ice machine when wiped by DM #79. Further observation of the kitchenette on the MCU, revealed there was a half-gallon of chocolate milk with an expiration date of 12/28/25 in the refrigerator and an undated block of American cheese in the refrigerator. Interview with DM #79 at the same time verified the findings in the MCU kitchenette.
Observation of the kitchenette in the T-2 unit on 12/30/25 at 11:24 P.M. with DM #70, revealed there were two half gallons of chocolate milk with expiration dates of 12/28/25. Interview with DM #70 at the same time verified the findings.
Review of the facility's undated ice machine and equipment policy revealed the ice machine would be cleaned and sanitized on a regular basis.
Review of the facility's undated food storage policy revealed food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves.
Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning and Sanitation of Dining and Food Services Areas policy, revealed the food and nutrition services staff would maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of dining and food service areas.
Review of the facility policy titled Employee Sanitary Practices revealed employees shall wear hair restraints to prevent hair from contacting exposed food.
November 18, 2025Complaint survey2 deficiencies▼
R-0391Resident incidents and log; identify resident upon request▼
Based on medical record review, staff interview, personnel file review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely care following a fall and failed to thoroughly investigate a fall. This affected one (#205) of the four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #205 revealed an admission date of 03/29/25. The resident transferred to the hospital on 11/01/25 and did not return to the facility. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the incident log from 08/17/25 to 11/17/25, revealed there was no incident listed for Resident #205 on 11/01/25. Review of the Resident Evaluation and Level of Care, dated 09/25/25, revealed the resident was independent with bathing, eating, mobility, transfers, and toileting. The resident was noted to be alert and oriented. Review of a statement dated 11/05/25 at 9:22 A.M., authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300, revealed she was dealing with another issue on the unit with another resident while passing medications and was under the impression Resident #205 was okay after they had gotten him up. LPN #300 stated staff asked her to print the resident's face sheet and medications because the wife had called 911 after the resident had fallen when he returned to the Memory Care Unit (MCU). LPN #300 stated she had to leave the unit and print everything off and, by the time she did that, Resident #205 had already left with Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Review of a progress note dated 11/01/25, authored by LPN #300, revealed the resident's wife took him off the MCU and staff were later called to a sitting area on the Assisted Living (AL) unit as the resident was unable to get off the couch. A caregiver was sent to assist and walked the resident back to the MCU where he sat down on the ground and was unable to be assisted to stand. The resident's wife called the son, who was unable to get the resident to his feet. The resident's wife then called 911 and EMS transported the resident to the hospital for evaluation. Interview on 11/17/25 at 2:18 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated LPN #300 was recently written up for a delay in responding to Resident #205's fall on 11/01/25. The DON stated Resident #205 had to be lifted, by a caregiver and AL nurse (LPN #330), from a couch on the AL and was brought back to the MCU by the AL nurse and caregiver. Upon returning Resident #205 to the unit, LPN #330 left the unit and Resident #205 fell out of the chair and onto the floor. The DON stated LPN #300 was alerted of Resident #205 falling from the chair and did not respond. Review of the personnel file of LPN #300 on 11/17/25 at 2:25 P.M., revealed a hire date of 08/12/25. LPN #300 signed the Abuse Policy on the date of hire, and all background checks were completed as required. LPN #300 received a verbal warning on 11/05/25 for an incident, which occurred on 11/01/25, where LPN #300 did not evaluate a resident's fall/change in condition in a timely manner. The resident had fallen in the hallway; the nurse was informed and did not evaluate the resident. Interview on 11/17/25 at 4:28 P.M., the Administrator who stated LPN #300 was written up because she did not assess Resident #205 for a change in condition following a fall on 11/01/25. The Administrator verified there was no entry on the incident log or fall investigation for Resident #205's fall on 11/01/25. Interview on 11/18/25 at 10:52 A.M., Hospitality Aid (HA) #360 stated on 11/01/25 at approximately 3:30 P.M., she and HA #350 were summoned to the AL unit to assist Resident #205. HA #360 stated the AL staff had lifted Resident #205 into a wheelchair and handed him off to HA #350 and #360. HA #360 stated the wife was pushing the wheelchair and HAs #350 and #360 each held a leg, as the resident was weak and could not hold his legs up. Once through the door, Resident #205 started to slip out of the chair and HAs #350 and #360 assisted Resident #205 by lowering him to the ground. HA #360 stated she left HA #350 with Resident #205 and his wife while she went to alert LPN #300 of Resident #205's fall. HA #350 stated she alerted LPN #300 of Resident #205's fall and the need for assistance and, as she and LPN #300 were walking toward the memory care unit, LPN #300 turned in a different direction and never came to the unit. HA #360 stated LPN #300 did not come to assess Resident #205, did not speak with Resident #205's wife, nor gave any report to EMS. HA #360 stated HA #350 stayed with Resident #205 as he continued to lay on the floor for approximately 20 to 30 minutes before EMS arrived and took Resident #205 to the hospital. Interview on 11/18/25 at 11:27 A.M., HA #350 stated, on 11/01/25, Resident #205 was brought through the MCU doors when she and the other aide were gathering residents for dinner. HA #350 stated Resident #205 was brought through the door by his wife. HA #350 stated Resident #205 slid out of the wheelchair onto the floor on his bottom. HA #350 stated HA #360 went to get the nurse (LPN #300) while Resident #205's wife called her son to come help. Resident #205's son arrived approximately 10 to 15 minutes later. HA #360 returned without LPN #300. Resident #205's son attempted to lift Resident #205 off the ground and was unable, so Resident #205's wife called 911. HA #350 stated the squad arrived and took Resident #205 and LPN #300 did not come to the unit to assess Resident #205 at any point before the squad left with Resident #205, approximately 30 minutes after Resident #205 initially fell out of the chair. Interview on 11/18/25 at 12:03 P.M., LPN #330 stated she was administering medications to residents on the AL unit when staff came to her and said they could not find the nurse for the MCU (LPN #300). LPN #330 stated she went to the sitting area on the AL unit and, with the help of another aide, assisted Resident #205 into a wheelchair. LPN #330 stated Resident #205 was agitated, so she had the aide alert the MCU staff (HAs #350 and #360) of the need for assistance. LPN #330 stated the wife was pushing the wheelchair while she (LPN #330) held Resident #205's feet. They walked through the doors of the memory care unit and HAs #350 and #360 came to them and took the resident. LPN #330 stated she then left the unit to return to her medication pass and, approximately 20 minutes later, she saw EMS and let them through the MCU doors. LPN #330 stated she saw Resident #205's wife and asked her what happened and the wife told her the resident was on the ground. LPN #330 stated she did not provide any further assistance as she was not asked by staff. Review of the facility policy titled Falls/Fall Risk ManagementBased on medical record review, staff interview, personnel file review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely care following a fall and failed to thoroughly investigate a fall. This affected one (#205) of the four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 85.
Findings include:
Review of the medical record of Resident #205 revealed an admission date of 03/29/25. The resident transferred to the hospital on 11/01/25 and did not return to the facility. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder.
Review of the incident log from 08/17/25 to 11/17/25, revealed there was no incident listed for Resident #205 on 11/01/25.
Review of the Resident Evaluation and Level of Care, dated 09/25/25, revealed the resident was independent with bathing, eating, mobility, transfers, and toileting. The resident was noted to be alert and oriented.
Review of a statement dated 11/05/25 at 9:22 A.M., authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300, revealed she was dealing with another issue on the unit with another resident while passing medications and was under the impression Resident #205 was okay after they had gotten him up. LPN #300 stated staff asked her to print the resident's face sheet and medications because the wife had called 911 after the resident had fallen when he returned to the Memory Care Unit (MCU). LPN #300 stated she had to leave the unit and print everything off and, by the time she did that, Resident #205 had already left with Emergency Medical Services (EMS).
Review of a progress note dated 11/01/25, authored by LPN #300, revealed the resident's wife took him off the MCU and staff were later called to a sitting area on the Assisted Living (AL) unit as the resident was unable to get off the couch. A caregiver was sent to assist and walked the resident back to the MCU where he sat down on the ground and was unable to be assisted to stand. The resident's wife called the son, who was unable to get the resident to his feet. The resident's wife then called 911 and EMS transported the resident to the hospital for evaluation.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 2:18 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated LPN #300 was recently written up for a delay in responding to Resident #205's fall on 11/01/25. The DON stated Resident #205 had to be lifted, by a caregiver and AL nurse (LPN #330), from a couch on the AL and was brought back to the MCU by the AL nurse and caregiver. Upon returning Resident #205 to the unit, LPN #330 left the unit and Resident #205 fell out of the chair and onto the floor. The DON stated LPN #300 was alerted of Resident #205 falling from the chair and did not respond.
Review of the personnel file of LPN #300 on 11/17/25 at 2:25 P.M., revealed a hire date of 08/12/25. LPN #300 signed the Abuse Policy on the date of hire, and all background checks were completed as required. LPN #300 received a verbal warning on 11/05/25 for an incident, which occurred on 11/01/25, where LPN #300 did not evaluate a resident's fall/change in condition in a timely manner. The resident had fallen in the hallway; the nurse was informed and did not evaluate the resident.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 4:28 P.M., the Administrator who stated LPN #300 was written up because she did not assess Resident #205 for a change in condition following a fall on 11/01/25. The Administrator verified there was no entry on the incident log or fall investigation for Resident #205's fall on 11/01/25.
Interview on 11/18/25 at 10:52 A.M., Hospitality Aid (HA) #360 stated on 11/01/25 at approximately 3:30 P.M., she and HA #350 were summoned to the AL unit to assist Resident #205. HA #360 stated the AL staff had lifted Resident #205 into a wheelchair and handed him off to HA #350 and #360. HA #360 stated the wife was pushing the wheelchair and HAs #350 and #360 each held a leg, as the resident was weak and could not hold his legs up. Once through the door, Resident #205 started to slip out of the chair and HAs #350 and #360 assisted Resident #205 by lowering him to the ground. HA #360 stated she left HA #350 with Resident #205 and his wife while she went to alert LPN #300 of Resident #205's fall. HA #350 stated she alerted LPN #300 of Resident #205's fall and the need for assistance and, as she and LPN #300 were walking toward the memory care unit, LPN #300 turned in a different direction and never came to the unit. HA #360 stated LPN #300 did not come to assess Resident #205, did not speak with Resident #205's wife, nor gave any report to EMS. HA #360 stated HA #350 stayed with Resident #205 as he continued to lay on the floor for approximately 20 to 30 minutes before EMS arrived and took Resident #205 to the hospital.
Interview on 11/18/25 at 11:27 A.M., HA #350 stated, on 11/01/25, Resident #205 was brought through the MCU doors when she and the other aide were gathering residents for dinner. HA #350 stated Resident #205 was brought through the door by his wife. HA #350 stated Resident #205 slid out of the wheelchair onto the floor on his bottom. HA #350 stated HA #360 went to get the nurse (LPN #300) while Resident #205's wife called her son to come help. Resident #205's son arrived approximately 10 to 15 minutes later. HA #360 returned without LPN #300. Resident #205's son attempted to lift Resident #205 off the ground and was unable, so Resident #205's wife called 911. HA #350 stated the squad arrived and took Resident #205 and LPN #300 did not come to the unit to assess Resident #205 at any point before the squad left with Resident #205, approximately 30 minutes after Resident #205 initially fell out of the chair.
Interview on 11/18/25 at 12:03 P.M., LPN #330 stated she was administering medications to residents on the AL unit when staff came to her and said they could not find the nurse for the MCU (LPN #300). LPN #330 stated she went to the sitting area on the AL unit and, with the help of another aide, assisted Resident #205 into a wheelchair. LPN #330 stated Resident #205 was agitated, so she had the aide alert the MCU staff (HAs #350 and #360) of the need for assistance. LPN #330 stated the wife was pushing the wheelchair while she (LPN #330) held Resident #205's feet. They walked through the doors of the memory care unit and HAs #350 and #360 came to them and took the resident. LPN #330 stated she then left the unit to return to her medication pass and, approximately 20 minutes later, she saw EMS and let them through the MCU doors. LPN #330 stated she saw Resident #205's wife and asked her what happened and the wife told her the resident was on the ground. LPN #330 stated she did not provide any further assistance as she was not asked by staff.
Review of the facility policy titled Falls/Fall Risk Management
R-0645Resident-activated call system▼
Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure an effective call system for all residents. This affected three (#10, #11, and #71) of the four residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 83.
Findings include:
1) Review of the medical record of Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 06/16/18. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, Parkinson's disease, and dizziness.
Review of the Service Plan for Resident #71 dated 04/15/25, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to dizziness and medication use. Interventions included ensuring a call light was in reach and to encourage the resident to use the call light for assistance as needed.
Review of the Resident Evaluation and Level of Care dated 09/24/25, revealed the resident was independent with bathing, eating, mobility, transfers, and toileting. The resident was alert and oriented.
Review of the Fall Risk Assessment for Resident #71 dated 09/24/25, revealed the resident was at a moderate risk for falls.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 10:25 A.M., Resident #71 stated she did not have a call light. Resident #71 stated, if she needed help, she had to go to the door of her room and call for staff to help, or, if she can't get to the door, she would have to lay and wait.
Observation on 11/17/25 at 10:27 A.M., revealed a call light box on Resident #71's nightstand, which was next to Resident #71's bed. The call light button was activated by the surveyor. A light illuminated on the call light box; however, there was no other visual notification of the call light observed. Continuous observation between 10:27 A.M. and 10:40 A.M., revealed no staff responded to Resident #71's activated call light.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 10:40 A.M., Hospitality Aid (HA) #320 stated she was not aware Resident #71's call light was activated. HA #320 stated call lights are connected to a pager system, so when a call light is activated, staff are alerted via the pager. HA #320 confirmed Resident #71 could use a call light and stated she had worked in the facility approximately seven months and she had not been trained in answering call lights or utilizing the call light system. HA #320 stated she was not carrying a pager as she was informed they needed to be re-programmed. HA #320 stated activated call lights also show up on a computer system in the nurse's station. HA #320 stated she checked on residents throughout her shift and would occasionally check the computer screen in the nurse station to see if call lights were activated.
Observation and interview on 11/17/25 at 10:45 A.M., revealed the computer in the nurse's station showed Resident #71's call light had been activated at 10:27 A.M. HA #320 confirmed Resident #71's call light was activated at 10:27 A.M. Further observation revealed a shelf on the wall in the nurse's station, which contained five pagers. HA #320 then picked up a pager, looked through it, saying there were several alerts on the pager; however, there was not an alert for Resident #71's call light. Continued observation revealed, at 10:47 A.M., the pager vibrated to alert of the call light being activated in Resident #71's room.
2) Review of the medical record of Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/16/25. Diagnoses included dementia, hypertension, and hallucinations.
Review of the Resident Evaluation and Level of Care for Resident #11 dated 09/23/25, revealed the resident was independent with bathing, eating, mobility, transfers, and toileting. The resident had moderately impaired cognition.
Observation on 11/17/25 at 11:10 A.M. revealed Resident #11's room did not have any call lights. There were call light holders on the wall in the bedroom and bathroom; however, neither contained a call light. Further observation revealed Resident #11 was in the hallway outside of his room and did not have a call pendant.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 11:10 A.M., HA #325 verified Resident #11's room did not have a call light. HA #325 further verified Resident #11 could utilize a call light.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 11:17 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #370 verified Resident #11 did not have a call pendant.
3) Review of the medical record of Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 02/01/24. Diagnoses included osteoporosis, breast cancer, dementia, and a history of falling.
Review of the Service Plan for Resident #10 dated 04/15/25, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to confusion, unaware of safety needs, and diuretic use. Interventions included ensuring a call light was within reach and to encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed.
Review of the Resident Evaluation and Level of Care for Resident #10 dated 09/21/25, revealed the resident required staff assistance with eating, mobility, transfers, and was dependent with bathing and toileting. The resident had a severe cognitive impairment.
Review of the Fall Risk Assessment for Resident #10 dated 09/21/25, revealed the resident was at a moderate risk for falls.
Observation on 11/17/25 at 11:11 A.M., HA #325 activated the call light in Resident #10's bedroom. The light on the box did not illuminate. HA #325 did not receive an alert on her pager. Further observation revealed there was no call light in Resident #10's bathroom.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 11:11 A.M., HA #325 verified the call light in Resident #10's bedroom did not alert her pager nor light up when it was activated. HA #325 further verified Resident #10's bathroom did not have a call light. HA #325 stated the battery on the call box was probably dead.
Observation on 11/17/25 at 11:20 A.M., HA #380 was assisting Resident #10 in her bathroom. Resident #10 was not observed to be wearing a call pendant.
Interview on 11/17/25 at 11:20 A.M., HA #380 verified Resident #10 did not have a call pendant. HA #380 stated Resident #10 was likely not capable of utilizing a call light, however she would use a call light/pendant to alert other staff if she was in the resident's room and in need of another staff member's assistance.
This violation represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00168790.