The most recent inspection on file for Symphony at Olmsted Falls took place on November 5, 2025. Across the 9 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 9 deficiencies.
A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.
This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 9 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 4; for the other 5 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 5 of which found none.
Facility Details
Inspections
9 on file · 9 deficienciesNovember 5, 2025Licensure survey3 deficiencies▼
R-0339Administered meds - given only to and as prescribed▼
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication was given per physician order. This affected one (#12) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission on 05/31/25. Diagnoses included seizure disorder, aortic valve stenosis, and episodic confusion. Review of the Functional Needs Service Plan dated 10/29/25 Resident #12 needed assistance with medication administration. Staff was to administer medications per doctors' orders. Review of the physician orders for Resident #12 revealed an order on 06/05/25 for Azelastine 0.1% spray. Use two sprays in each nostril two times a day. Observation on 11/05/25 at 8:17 A.M. of Medication Technician (MT) #200 administering Resident #12's Azelastine nasal spray revealed only one spray was administered into each nostril. Interview on 11/05/25 at 10:30 A.M. with MT #200 confirmed Resident #12 was to receive two sprays of Azelastine into each nostril and only one was administered. Review of the policy titled Medication AdministrationBased on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication was given per physician order. This affected one (#12) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 45.
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission on 05/31/25. Diagnoses included seizure disorder, aortic valve stenosis, and episodic confusion. Review of the Functional Needs Service Plan dated 10/29/25 Resident #12 needed assistance with medication administration. Staff was to administer medications per doctors' orders.
Review of the physician orders for Resident #12 revealed an order on 06/05/25 for Azelastine 0.1% spray. Use two sprays in each nostril two times a day.
Observation on 11/05/25 at 8:17 A.M. of Medication Technician (MT) #200 administering Resident #12's Azelastine nasal spray revealed only one spray was administered into each nostril.
Interview on 11/05/25 at 10:30 A.M. with MT #200 confirmed Resident #12 was to receive two sprays of Azelastine into each nostril and only one was administered.
Review of the policy titled Medication Administration
R-0559Procure, store, prepare, distribute and serve foods▼
Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure holding food temperatures for special diets were in safe temperature range. This had the potential to affect five (#18,24,28,35,44) residents who receive special diets. The facility census was 45.
Findings include:
Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission on 04/30/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for a mechanical soft diet. Review of the Functional Needs Service Plan dated 12/11/24 revealed Resident #18 was on a mechanical soft diet. Interventions included providing a mechanical soft diet for all meals and snacks.
Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission on 11/15/24. Diagnoses included moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, and asthma. Review of the physician order dated 06/05/25 revealed Resident #24 had an order for a mechanical soft diet. Review of the Functional Needs Service Plan dated 09/02/25 revealed Resident #24 was on a mechanical soft diet. Interventions included receiving a mechanical soft diet for all meals and snacks.
Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission on 05/18/23. Diagnoses included constipation and dementia. Review of the physician order for Resident #44 revealed an order for a puree diet on 04/04/24. Review of the Functional Needs Service Assessment dated 09/10/25 revealed Resident #44 received a puree diet. Interventions included receiving a puree diet for all meals.
Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission on 06/13/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and dementia. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for a puree diet. Review of the Resident Functional Needs Service Plan dated 11/05/25 revealed Resident #28 was on a puree diet. Interventions included receiving a puree diet at all meals.
Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission on 08/14/23. Diagnoses included G
gastroesophageal reflux disorder, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of the physician order for Resident #35 revealed an order on 08/08/25 for a chopped diet. Review of the Functional Needs Service Plan dated 08/08/25 revealed Resident #35 received a chopped diet. Interventions included serving a chopped diet at all meals.
Observation on 11/05/25 at 11:30 A.M. of the second floor kitchenette revealed hot foot was brought up in metal containers and placed on the unused stove. There were no warmers for the food. Also noted was pea salad in separate four ounce containers on a tray.
Observation on 11/05/25 at 11:30 A.M. of Dietary Aide (DA) #300 taking temperature of the pea salad revealed a temperature of 43 degrees Fahrenheit (F), mechanical soft meatloaf at 115 degrees F, and puree meatloaf at 112 degrees F.
Interview with DA #300 on 11/05/25 at 11:35 A.M. revealed there are no steam tables to ensure the food remains warm. DA #300 stated soup is served first then the main meals. DA #300 further stated the residents who receive puree food are both fed by staff and have to wait until staff were in the dining room to eat. DA #300 stated after the second floor is done, the mechanical soft food and the puree food were taken down to the first floor to be served, without placing the food on a warmer. DA #300 confirmed the mechanical soft and puree meat were supposed to be above 140 degrees F, and the pea salad was to be below 41 degrees F.
R-0615Fire drill requirements▼
Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to document the fire monitoring company received the fire alarm pull. The facility also failed to evacuate residents during fire drills. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 45. Findings include: 1. Review of the fire drills on 11/20/24, 12/20/24, 01/30/25, 02/27/25, 03/27/25, 04/28/25, 05/29/25, 06/27/25, 07/21/25, 08/28/25, 09/26/25, and 10/30/25 revealed no documentation of when the fire monitoring station received the fire alarm. Interview with Maintenance Director #100 on 10/05/25 at 10:30 A.M. confirmed there was no documentation of when the fire monitoring station received the fire alarm signal during the fire drills on 11/20/24, 12/20/24, 01/30/25, 02/27/25, 03/27/25, 04/28/25, 05/29/25, 06/27/25, 07/21/25, 08/28/25, 09/26/25, and 10/30/25. Review of the facility policy titled Fire Drill ProcedureBased on record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to document the fire monitoring company received the fire alarm pull. The facility also failed to evacuate residents during fire drills. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 45.
Findings include:
1. Review of the fire drills on 11/20/24, 12/20/24, 01/30/25, 02/27/25, 03/27/25, 04/28/25, 05/29/25, 06/27/25, 07/21/25, 08/28/25, 09/26/25, and 10/30/25 revealed no documentation of when the fire monitoring station received the fire alarm.
Interview with Maintenance Director #100 on 10/05/25 at 10:30 A.M. confirmed there was no documentation of when the fire monitoring station received the fire alarm signal during the fire drills on 11/20/24, 12/20/24, 01/30/25, 02/27/25, 03/27/25, 04/28/25, 05/29/25, 06/27/25, 07/21/25, 08/28/25, 09/26/25, and 10/30/25.
Review of the facility policy titled Fire Drill Procedure
July 16, 2025Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
December 12, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
June 24, 2024Licensure survey1 deficiency▼
R-0624Train all residents in fire drills▼
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure monthly fire safety inspection were conducted. This affected 35 resident residing at the facility.
Findings include:
Review of the monthly safety fire inspection log for 2024 revealed no evidence of fire inspections from January 2024 through June 2024.
Interview with the Executive Director on 06/20/24 at 9:08 A.M. verified monthly self fire safety were not conducted in 2024.