11
Inspections on file
19
Deficiencies cited
4
Visits with none
0
Substandard care
0
Immediate jeopardy

The most recent inspection on file for Otterbein Sunset House took place on May 1, 2025. Across the 11 inspections published by the Ohio Department of Health, surveyors cited 19 deficiencies.

A deficiency is a rule the surveyor found the facility was not meeting. Ohio inspects against two rule books at once, so most findings carry a federal code and an Ohio code for the same problem; each is counted once here, the way the state counts it. Correction dates are the state's confirmation that the issue was fixed.

This report reproduces what Ohio publishes and nothing else. Of the 11 inspections listed, the state publishes the surveyor's written findings for 7; for the other 4 it publishes only the date, the type of visit and the number of deficiencies - 4 of which found none.

Facility Details

Administrator
Brian Soller
Director of nursing
Alana Worden
Phone
(419) 536-4645
Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
CMS overall rating
3 of 5
CMS health inspection
3 of 5
CMS quality measures
5 of 5
CMS staffing
1 of 5

Inspections

11 on file · 19 deficiencies
May 1, 2025Certification survey · 92.16% of codes compliant (state average 88.48%)8 deficiencies▼
F-0584Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike EnvironmentFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0506, N-0350 · correction confirmed 05/30/2025▼
What the surveyor found

Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident toilet facilities were maintained in a sanitary manner. This affected one of 14 residents (#125) reviewed for environmental and housekeeping services. Facility census was 14.

Findings include:

Resident #125 admitted to the facility on 04/25/25 with diagnoses including, nondisplaced right femur fracture, paranoid schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, depression, coronary artery disease and heart failure.

According to the functional abilities assessment dated 04/25/25 assessed Resident #125 to require substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living. On 04/26/25 skilled nursing charting assessed Resident #125 as alert and oriented to person and place, received oxygen via nasal cannula, continent of bowel and bladder, and unable to bear weight with unsteady gait.

On 04/28/25 at 12:10 P.M. observation in Resident #125's private restroom located inside the resident room discovered a soiled bedpan placed on top of the toilet. The bedpan contained a yellow liquid substance pooling in the pan. The toilet had particles of brown substance clinging to the toilet bowl. Located on the floor of the restroom next to the toilet noted a brown substance on the floor tile.

Interview with Housekeeper #211 on 04/29/25 at 7:58 A.M. verified the soiled restroom contained in Resident #125 room on 04/28/25. Housekeeper #211 further stated frequently following weekends the resident restrooms are discovered with soiled debris.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0727RN 8 Hrs/7 days/Wk, Full Time DONFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0202 · correction confirmed 05/30/2025▼
What the surveyor found

Based on staff interview and review of facility staffing documentation, the facility failed to ensure the facility was staffed with sufficient Registered Nursing staff each day. This affected all residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 14.

Findings include:

Review of facility nursing schedules between 04/21/25 and 04/27/25 revealed the schedule lacked documentation indicating a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled to work in the facility on 04/26/25 and 04/27/25.

On 04/30/25 at 1:37 P.M. interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) during a review of the nurse staffing scheduled between 04/21/25 and 04/27/25 verified the facility was not staffed with a Registered Nurse on 04/26/25 or 04/27/25. The Administrator stated the DON was on call on 04/26/25 and 04/27/25. However, the DON did not report to the facility on either date.

On 05/01/25 at 7:50 A.M. review of facility weekly staffing sheet between 04/21/25 and 04/27/25 during interview with the DON confirmed no Registered Nurse was working in the facility on 04/26/25 and 04/27/25.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0756Drug Regimen Review, Report Irregular, Act OnFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0540 · correction confirmed 05/30/2025▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident pharmacy medication regimen reviews were conducted monthly. This affected two of five sampled residents (#4, #1) reviewed for unnecessary medications and related pharmacy services in a facility census of 14.

Findings include:

1. Resident #4 admitted to the facility on 03/26/14 with the diagnosis including, cerebral infarction resulting in hemiplegia and hemiparesis right side, dysphagia, abnormal posture, coronary artery disease, hypokalemia, congestive heart failure, glaucoma, atrial fibrillation, major depression, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. According to the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 03/14/25 Resident #4 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, no behaviors, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and received scheduled pain medications.

Review of Resident #4's medical record noted current physician orders for 17 medications including oral, topical, eye, and inhalation.

According to progress notes on 04/05/25 at 6:39 P.M. a pharmacy review was completed including the resident's medication regimen and have noted any irregularities and/or observations on a separate report to the Director of Nursing (DON) and prescriber. No documentation contained in the medical record indicated information related to the result of the medication regimen review.

On 04/30/25 at 7:35 A.M. interview with the DON verified no documentation contained in the medical record was available indicating the results of the pharmacist monthly medication review or specific medication adjustments.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0757Drug Regimen is Free From Unnecessary DrugsFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0439 · correction confirmed 05/30/2025▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychoactive medication recommendations were implemented as directed by the physician. This affected one of five sampled residents (#4) reviewed for the provision of unnecessary medication administration in a facility census of 14.

Findings include:

Resident #4 admitted to the facility on 03/26/14 with diagnoses including, cerebral infarction resulting in hemiplegia and hemiparesis right side, dysphagia, abnormal posture, coronary artery disease, hypokalemia, congestive heart failure, glaucoma, atrial fibrillation, major depression, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. According to the most current Minimum Data Set assessment dated 03/14/25 Resident #4 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, no behaviors, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and received pain medications.

On 12/13/16 a nursing plan of care was initiated to address Resident #4 risk for side effects from psychotropic medication use for diagnosis of depression. Interventions included the following; Administer Effexor medication as ordered by doctor. Discuss with resident and family potential side effects of the drug Venlafaxine. Monitor and record resident behaviors. Observe resident for adverse side effects, document if noted, notify resident physician. The pharmacy consultant will review medication every month, and make recommendations as needed.

On 05/07/24 a physician order was initiated for the administration of Venlafaxine HCl ER 37.5 milligrams (mg) to be administered related to major depressive disorder.

According to pharmacy recommendation note to attending physician/prescriber dated 01/10/25 Consultant Pharmacist listed current psychiatric medication to include the administration of Effexor ER 37.5 mg QD since at least 05/07/24. The Consultant Pharmacist requested the physician consider a possible gradual dose reduction (GDR). Please complete the form indicating any change in medication (med) orders or documentation as to why you (physician) consider a GDR is not indicated at this time. Physician response dated 01/31/25 documented to involve psych (psychiatry/psychology). No documentation contained in the medical record indicated the physician response was implemented.

On 04/30/25 at 7:35 A.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) during a review of pharmacy the recommendation 01/31/25 confirmed the physicians response had note been implemented.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0759Free of Medication Error Rates of 5% or MoreFederal citation · correction confirmed 05/30/2025▼
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were provided as ordered by the physician and without error. This resulted in three errors of 37 medications being administered with a 8.11% error rate. This affected one of three residents (#20) observed for medication administration in a facility census of 14.

Findings include:

Resident #20 admitted to the facility on 03/18/25 with diagnoses including, pneumonia, hypoxemia, fluid overload, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long term use insulin, polyneuropathy, glaucoma, chronic kidney disease, hypertension and depression. According to the most current Minimum Data Set assessment dated 03/22/25 assessed Resident #20 with moderately impaired cognition, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, vision adequate with corrective lenses, and incontinent of urine.

Review of physician orders noted the following; 03/18/25 Cilostazol Oral Tablet 100 milligrams (mg) (Cilostazol)

Give 1 tablet by mouth every morning and at bedtime for claudication. On 03/18/25 Dorzolamide HCl Ophthalmic Solution 2 % (Dorzolamide HCl) Instill 1 drop in both eyes every morning and at bedtime for glaucoma. On 03/20/25 Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.2 % (Brimonidine Tartrate)

Instill 1 drop in left eye every 12 hours for glaucoma.

Observation on 04/29/25 at 9:22 A.M. noted Registered Nurse (RN) #207 gathering medications for Resident #20. Medications included brimonidine 0.2% eye drops and dorzolamide 2% eye drops. At the time of observation RN #207 stated the medication cilostzol 100 milligrams (mg) was not available and would not be administered. RN #207 then proceeded to Resident #20's room and administered several medications mouth. At 9:31 A.M. RN #207 placed one drop of brimonidine 0.2% into Resident #30 left eye. After 30 seconds RN #207 placed one drop of dorzolamide 2% into each eye. No pause between eye drop medications was attempted.

On 04/29/25 at 9:40 A.M. interview with RN #207 verified eye drops were given one after another with no pause between. In addition the medication cilostazol 100 mg was to be administered twice daily and the morning dose would be omitted due to not being available at the facility.

According to medication administration procedure revised November 9, 2021. Medications are administered only by licensed nursing, medical, pharmacy or other personnel authorized by state laws and regulations to administer medications. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician or physician extender. Medications are administered within one hour before or one hour after scheduled time.

According to facility medication administration procedure for eye drop administration dated May 2022. The time for optimal eye drop absorption is approximately 3 to 5 minutes. If another drop of the same or different medication is prescribed for administration in the same eye at the same time, wait 3 to 5 minutes. In the case of administering levobunolol, timolol, brinzolamide, or dorzolamide, wait 10 minutes before administering additional drops.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0760Residents Are Free of Significant Med ErrorsFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0533 · correction confirmed 05/30/2025▼
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered to prevent the occurrences of significant medication errors. This affected two of four sampled residents (#20, #125) reviewed for the administration of medications in a facility census of 14.

Findings include:

1. Resident #20 admitted to the facility on 03/18/25 with diagnoses including, pneumonia, hypoxemia, fluid overload, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long term use insulin, polyneuropathy, glaucoma, chronic kidney disease, hypertension and depression. According to the most current Minimum Data Set assessment dated 03/22/25 assessed Resident #20 with moderately impaired cognition, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, vision adequate with corrective lenses, and incontinent of urine.

Review of physician orders noted the following; 03/18/25 Cilostazol Oral Tablet 100 milligrams (mg) (Cilostazol)

Give 1 tablet by mouth every morning and at bedtime for claudication. On 03/18/25 Dorzolamide HCl Ophthalmic Solution 2 % (Dorzolamide HCl) Instill 1 drop in both eyes every morning and at bedtime for glaucoma. On 03/20/25 Brimonidine Tartrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.2 % (Brimonidine Tartrate)

Instill 1 drop in left eye every 12 hours for glaucoma.

Observation on 04/29/25 at 9:22 A.M. noted Registered Nurse (RN) #207 gathering medications for Resident #20. Medications included brimonidine 0.2% eye drops and dorzolamide 2% eye drops. At there time of observation RN #207 stated the medication cilostzol 100 milligrams (mg) was not available and would not be administered. RN #207 then proceeded to Resident #20 room and administered several medications mouth. At 9:31 A.M. RN #207 placed one drop of brimonidine 0.2% into Resident #30 left eye. After 30 seconds RN #207 placed one drop of dorzolamide 2% into each eye. No pause between eye drop medications was attempted.

On 04/29/25 at 9:40 A.M. interview with RN #207 verified eye drops were given one after another with no pause between. In addition the medication cilostazol 100 mg was to be administered twice daily and the morning dose would be omitted due to not being available at the facility.

According to facility medication administration procedure for eye drop administration dated May 2022. The time for optimal eye drop absorption is approximately 3 to 5 minutes. If another drop of the same or different medication is prescribed for administration in the same eye at the same time, wait 3 to 5 minutes. In the case of administering levobunolol, timolol, brinzolamide, or dorzolamide, wait 10 minutes before administering additional drops.

2. Resident #125 admitted to the facility on 04/25/25 with diagnoses including, nondisplaced right femur fracture, paranoid schizophrenia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, alzheimer's disease, dementia, depression, coronary artery disease and heart failure.

According to the functional abilities assessment dated 04/25/25 assessed Resident #125 to require substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living. On 04/26/25 skilled nursing charting assessed Resident #125 as alert and oriented to person and place, received oxygen via nasal cannula, continent of bowel and bladder, unable to bear weight with unsteady gait, and intact skin.

Review of physician orders dated 04/26/25 noted Vilazodone 20 milligrams (mg) to be administered in the morning related to depression.

Review of Medication Administration Records (MAR) between 04/26/25 and 04/28/25 noted the medication documented as not administered. No further documentation contained evidence indicating the medication was administered or the physician being notified of the omission.

On 05/01/25 at 9:34 A.M. interview with Director of Nursing following medical record review verified Resident #125 did not receive Vilazodone 20 mg on 04/26/25, 04/27/25, 04/28/25 due to medication not available in facility.

According to medication administration procedure revised November 9, 2021, medications are administered only by licensed nursing, medical, pharmacy or other personnel authorized by state laws and regulations to administer medications. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician or physician extender. Medications are administered within one hour before or one hour after scheduled time.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0880Infection Prevention and ControlFederal citation · correction confirmed 05/30/2025▼
What the surveyor found

Based on interview, facility documentation, and a policy for water management, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient water management program based on an accurate risk assessment. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 14. Findings include: Review of a document titled Legionnaire's Risk Assessment revealed the document was undated, unsigned, and did not include the name of the facility. Interview on 05/01/25 at 9:15 A.M. with Administrator and Environmental Services Director #233 confirmed the risk assessment did not include the date of the assessment, a signature, or the name of the facility. Both denied knowledge of when the risk assessment was completed and by whom. Review of policy titled, Water Management Program for Legionella Risk ReductionBased on interview, facility documentation, and a policy for water management, the facility failed to ensure a sufficient water management program based on an accurate risk assessment. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 14.

Findings include:

Review of a document titled Legionnaire's Risk Assessment revealed the document was undated, unsigned, and did not include the name of the facility.

Interview on 05/01/25 at 9:15 A.M. with Administrator and Environmental Services Director #233 confirmed the risk assessment did not include the date of the assessment, a signature, or the name of the facility. Both denied knowledge of when the risk assessment was completed and by whom.

Review of policy titled, Water Management Program for Legionella Risk Reduction

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0921Safe/Functional/Sanitary/Comfortable EnvironmentFederal citation · correction confirmed 12/24/2024▼
What the surveyor found

Based on staff interview and review of fire drill reports, corrective action plans, and a state fire marshal report, the facility failed to conduct fire drills across all shifts during the twelve-month review period preceding the survey. This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 14.

Findings include:

Interview on 05/01/25 at 9:15 A.M. with the Administrator and Environmental Services Director (ESD) #233 revealed fire drills were not conducted on first or third shift in the first quarter of 2024, and no fire drill was conducted on third shift in the third quarter of 2024.

Follow-up interview on 05/01/25 at 1:15 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the state fire marshal issued a violation on 07/25/24 for failure to conduct fire drills across all shifts during each quarter.

Review of the Emergency and Disaster Plan, last reviewed 11/26/24, confirmed fire drills are to be conducted monthly and rotated so drills are conducted on each shift at least once per quarter.

The deficient practice was corrected on 12/24/24 when the facility implemented the following corrective actions:

On 08/22/24 and 08/23/24, the facility educated all staff, including maintenance staff, on fire safety.

On 10/01/24, the (former) Environmental Services Director was educated by the Administrator on conducting fire drills. This employee was later terminated for continued failure to perform job duties, including those pertaining to fire drills.

The facility conducted fire drills on 10/12/24 on third shift, on 11/12/24 on first and second shifts, on 12/12/24 on third shift, on 12/16/24 on first shift, and on 12/19/24 on second shift. These drills met the state fire marshal's required corrective actions.

The Administrator conducted audits of fire drill documentation on 10/12/24, 11/12/24, 12/16/24, and 12/19/24 and found no further deficiencies.

On 11/26/24, a representative from the Toledo Fire Prevention Bureau and the Administrator reviewed the facility's Emergency and Disaster Plan and deemed it satisfactory.

On 12/24/24, the Division of State Fire Marshal Code Enforcement Bureau conducted an onsite inspection and determined the facility had corrected the drill violation, effective 12/24/24.

Since the date of correction on 12/24/24, the facility conducted fire drills on 01/17/25, 02/27/25, 03/20/25, and 04/18/25.

Review of the fire drill reports for drills conducted since the 12/24/24 correction, confirmed the facility has had no further deficiencies with fire drills.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
October 30, 2024Complaint survey1 deficiency▼
F-0600Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and ExploitationFederal citation · correction confirmed 10/11/2024▼
What the surveyor found

THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.

Based on record review, review of the facility policy, staff interview, and review of the facility self-reported incident, the facility failed to prevent staff-to-resident physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 15.

Findings include:

Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/14/17. Diagnoses included peripheral venous insufficiency, polyarthritis, macular degeneration right and left eye, dementia, chronic kidney disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral vascular accident. An additional diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis was added on 10/21/24.

Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/09/24 Resident #1 was highly impaired visually and had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toilet hygiene, bathing and bed mobility and required the physical assistance of two people for transfers using a lift device. Resident #1 was also incontinent of bowel and bladder.

Review of the care plan for Resident #1 revealed an activities of daily living (ADL) deficit due to impaired cognition and hemiparesis. Interventions included for caretakers to provide assistance without rushed care, anticipate needs, allow of rest periods with care and to ensure a safe environment.

Review of the skin assessment completed on 09/18/24 at 4:35 P.M. revealed Resident #1 had bruising to the right hand and wrist. The skin assessment completed on 09/19/24 at 5:30 P.M. revealed Resident #1 had bruising to bilateral forearms. Additional skin assessments completed on 09/19/24 and 09/20/24 revealed bilateral forearm bruising.

The provider progress note dated 09/19/24 revealed Resident #1 had bruising to the right and left arm and wrist. The left forearm bruise was darkening, and the right wrist continued to improve.

Review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) dated 09/18/24 revealed on 09/18/24 at approximately 4:00 P.M., a family member of Resident #1 reported to the Director of Nursing that State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #75 was rough when providing care on the midnight shift. The facility's investigation revealed the family's video camera footage was reviewed and found STNA #75 did provide improper care and had disrespectful communication with Resident #1.

Interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 10/30/24 at 11:00 A.M. stated Resident #1's family showed video footage from the video camera in Resident #1's room. The ED stated on 09/18/24, STNA #275 crossed Resident #1's across the resident's chest, pulled the resident's shirt up over the crossed arms of Resident #1 and secured the shirt over the resident's shoulders, limiting the resident's movement. Additionally, STNA #275 mocked Resident #1 when the resident was moaning during care.

Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Mistreatment, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
August 30, 2024Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
✅
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
June 24, 2024Complaint survey1 deficiency▼
F-0812Food Procurement,Store/Prepare/Serve-SanitaryFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0559▼
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to seal and date opened food items in the freezer. This had to potential to affect all 19 residents residing in the facility.

Findings include:

Observation on 06/24/24 of the kitchen's freezer from 7:20 A.M. to 7:45 A.M. revealed an opened, unsealed, undated bag of Alaskan polluck, an opened, unsealed, undated bag of turkey sausage, an opened, unsealed, undated bag of seasoned beef patties. Interview on 06/24/24 at 7:25 A.M. with Dietary Cook #202 verified the finding.

Interview on 06/24/24 at 1:26 P.M. with the Administrator stated all residents were getting food from the kitchen and there were no residents nothing by mouth.

Review of the facility's Food Storage and Policy and Procedure

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
April 1, 2024Complaint survey1 deficiency▼
N-0734Informed of basic rate and changesOhio citation · correction confirmed 04/30/2024▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, review of admissions documents, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure admission agreements were provided and signed timely for newly admitted residents. This affected three (#10, #11, and #12) of three residents reviewed for admissions. The facility census was 20.

Finding Include:

1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/02/24 and a discharge date of 02/18/24. Diagnoses included sepsis, prostate cancer, type II diabetes, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and acute respiratory infection.

Review of Resident #10's admission agreement revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on 02/02/24. The admission agreement form contained the services the facility would provide, cost of services and payor sources, resident rights, bed hold notification, consent for ancillary services, and a consent to treat. Resident #10 was not provided his agreement for signature until 02/11/24, nine days after his admission to the facility.

2. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/02/24 and a discharge date of 02/14/24. Diagnoses included fracture of the right clavicle subsequent encounter, urinary tract infection, anxiety disorder, heart disease, spinal stenosis, and cognitive communication deficit.

Review of Resident #11's admission agreement revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on 02/02/24. The admission agreement form contained the services the facility would provide, cost of services and payor sources, resident rights, bed hold notification, consent for ancillary services, and a consent to treat. Resident #11 was not provided his agreement for signature until 02/11/24, nine days after his admission to the facility and three days prior to his discharge.

3. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/05/24 and a discharge date of 02/13/24. Diagnoses included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, obesity, atrial fibrillation, ventral hernia, long term use of anticoagulants, and cognitive communication deficit.

Review of Resident #12's admission agreement revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on 02/05/24. The admission agreement form contained the services the facility would provide, cost of services and payor sources, resident rights, bed hold notification, consent for ancillary services, and a consent to treat. Resident #11 was not provided his agreement for signature until 02/12/24, seven days after his admission to the facility and one day prior to his discharge.

Interview on 04/01/24 at 10:02 A.M. with Admissions Director (AD) #237 revealed typically resident admission packets were signed within 72 hours of admission, though there was not defined timeframe for signature. AD #237 Verified Resident #10, #11, and #12 had not signed their admission agreements until seven to nine days after admission to the facility. AD #237 verified the agreements contained the consent to treat, cost of stay, services offered, photo release, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) policy, resident rights, and consent for ancillary services.

Review of the facility policy titled, Admission Policy

Rule
Ohio Administrative Code - nursing home rules
January 22, 2024Complaint survey1 deficiency▼
F-0684Quality of careFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0439 · correction confirmed 02/10/2024▼
What the surveyor found

Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders to obtain daily weights to monitor for fluid overload. This affected two (#20 and #1) of three residents reviewed for daily weights. The facility census was 18.

Findings include:

1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 10/12/23 and a discharge date of 12/18/23. Diagnosis included congestive heart failure (CHF).

Review of the physician orders for Resident #20 revealed an order for daily weight and to notify the physician of a greater than two-pound weight gain in 24 hours, or greater than five pound weight gain in one week.

Review of Resident' #20's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for 10//23 revealed no daily weights were obtained for the following days: 10/17/23, 10/18/23, 1022/23, 10/24/23, 10/25/23, 10/27/23, 10/28/23, 10/29/23, 10/30/23, and 10/31/23.

Review of the TAR for the month of 11/23 revealed revealed no daily weights were obtained for th following days: 11/02/23, 11/04/23, 11/05/23, 11/08/23, 11/09/23, 11/10/23, 11/12/23, and 11/13/23.

Review of the TAR for the month of 12/23 revealed revealed no daily weights were obtained for th following days: 12/04/23, 12/07/23, 12/08/23, 12/09/23, 12/10/23, 12/11/23, and 12/17/23.

2. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/17/19 with a diagnosis of heart failure.

Review of the current physician orders for Resident #1 revealed an order to obtain a daily weight and notify the physician for weight gain of greater than two pounds in 24 hours or greater than five pounds in one week.

Review of the TAR for Resident #1 for 11/23 revealed revealed no daily weights were obtained for the following days: 11/02/23, 11/03/23, 11/05/23, 11/06/23, 11/07/23, 11/08/23, 11/09/23, 11/10/23/11/11/23, 11/12/23, 11/15/23, 11/17/23, 11/20/23, and 11/26/23.

Review of the TAR for Resident #1 for 12/23 revealed revealed no daily weights were obtained for the following days: 12/04/23, 12/09/23, 12/21/23, 12/23/23, 12/24/23, and 12/25/23.

Interview on 01/22/24 at 12:45 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified daily weights were missing for Resident #20 and Resident #1.

This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00149536.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
August 18, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
✅
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
April 6, 2023Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
✅
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.
March 3, 2023Complaint survey2 deficiencies▼
F-0755Pharmacy Svcs/Procedures/Pharmacist/RecordsFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0540 · correction confirmed 03/30/2023▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, staff interview, and drug manufacturer indications for use, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained and administered as prescribed in a timely fashion. This affected one (#1) of five residents reviewed for the provision of medications. The census was 14.

Findings include:

Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on 01/20/23. Diagnoses included a right humerus fracture, COVID-19, coronary artery disease, carotid artery stenosis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, malignant neoplasm of bladder, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebral infarction.

Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 01/24/23 revealed Resident #1 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living.

Review of Resident #1's nursing progress notes on 02/16/23 at 8:12 A.M., Resident #1 tested positive for COVID-19. The Director of Nursing was notified and the resident was placed into droplet isolation. At 10:09 A.M., Resident #1's family member was notified of the positive COVID-19 test result. At 10:42 A.M., the physician was notified and no new orders were obtained. Further review of the nursing progress notes on 02/17/23 at 2:24 P.M. revealed Resident #1's family representative requested to call the physician to obtain a monoclonal (antiviral) medication to reduce COVID-19 symptoms and the nurse noted a voicemail was left for the physician. On 02/19/23 at 10:45 P.M., the nurse indicated the medication Paxlovid (150/100) oral tablet therapy pack give 150 milligrams (mg) by mouth every morning and at bedtime every five days was ordered, but the the medication was not in stock and the facility was awaiting arrival from pharmacy. The order was changed for Resident #1 to start the medication in the morning on 02/20/23. Review of a nursing progress note dated 02/20/23 at 7:54 A.M. revealed the nurse documented Resident #1's Paxlovid was not available. A nursing progress note was written on 02/20/23 at 1:47 P.M. that Resident #1's Paxlovid medication was delivered and was given after lunch. There was no further documentation contained in the medical record noted the medication was administered. Review of a a nursing progress note on 02/23/23 at 11:53 A.M. revealed the nurse noted having the Paxlovid in the computer, but it was not on the electronic medication administration record (EMAR) to allow for administration. The nurse communicated the concern with the Director of Nursing and updated the family that the medication was available; however, the medication could not be given until it was transcribed to the EMAR. Resident #1 received the medication during the evening medication administration of 02/23/23.

Review of the February 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #1 did not receive the first dose of Paxlovid 150 milligrams (mg) until the evening of 02/20/23 and another dose was not given until 02/23/23 due to a transcription error.

Interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing(DON) on 03/03/23 at 11:35 A.M. confirmed Resident #1 did not receive the medication Paxlovid from the pharmacy in a timely manner. The physician was notified of the medication request on 02/17/23 and did not respond until 02/19/23. One dose of the medication was administered during the evening of 02/20/23 and not administered again until 02/23/23 in the evening due to a transcription error. The DON verified the primary pharmacy was unable to obtain the medication and attempted to contact a secondary pharmacy that was unable to obtain the medication. No communication from the pharmacy was provided to the facility until 02/19/23 regarding the status of the medication.

Review of Paxlovid manufacturer indications for use, revised February 2023, instructed to initiate Paxlovid treatment as soon as possible after diagnosis of COVID-19 and within five days of symptom onset.

This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00140774.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0760Residents Are Free of Significant Med ErrorsFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0533 · correction confirmed 03/30/2023▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, staff interview, and drug manufacturer indications for use, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained and administered as prescribed by the physician. This affected one (#1) of five residents reviewed for the provision of medications. The census was 14.

Findings include:

Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on 01/20/23. Diagnoses included a right humerus fracture, COVID-19, coronary artery disease, carotid artery stenosis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, malignant neoplasm of bladder, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebral infarction.

Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 01/24/23 revealed Resident #1 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living.

Review of Resident #1's nursing progress notes on 02/16/23 at 8:12 A.M., Resident #1 tested positive for COVID-19. The Director of Nursing was notified and the resident was placed into droplet isolation. At 10:09 A.M., Resident #1's family member was notified of the positive COVID-19 test result. At 10:42 A.M., the physician was notified and no new orders were obtained. Further review of the nursing progress notes on 02/17/23 at 2:24 P.M. revealed Resident #1's family representative requested to call the physician to obtain a monoclonal (antiviral) medication to reduce COVID-19 symptoms and the nurse noted a voicemail was left for the physician. On 02/19/23 at 10:45 P.M., the nurse indicated the medication Paxlovid (150/100) oral tablet therapy pack give 150 milligrams (mg) by mouth every morning and at bedtime every five days was ordered, but the the medication was not in stock and the facility was awaiting arrival from pharmacy. The order was changed for Resident #1 to start the medication in the morning on 02/20/23. Review of a nursing progress note dated 02/20/23 at 7:54 A.M. revealed the nurse documented Resident #1's Paxlovid was not available. A nursing progress note was written on 02/20/23 at 1:47 P.M. that Resident #1's Paxlovid medication was delivered and was given after lunch. There was no further documentation contained in the medical record noted the medication was administered. Review of a a nursing progress note on 02/23/23 at 11:53 A.M. revealed the nurse noted having the Paxlovid in the computer, but it was not on the electronic medication administration record (EMAR) to allow for administration. The nurse communicated the concern with the Director of Nursing and updated the family that the medication was available; however, the medication could not be given until it was transcribed to the EMAR. Resident #1 received the medication during the evening medication administration of 02/23/23.

Review of the February 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #1 did not receive the first dose of Paxlovid 150 milligrams (mg) until the evening of 02/20/23 and another dose was not given until 02/23/23 due to a transcription error.

Interview with the Administrator and Director of Nursing(DON) on 03/03/23 at 11:35 A.M. confirmed Resident #1 did not receive the medication Paxlovid from the pharmacy in a timely manner. The physician was notified of the medication request on 02/17/23 and did not respond until 02/19/23. One dose of the medication was administered during the evening of 02/20/23 and not administered again until 02/23/23 in the evening due to a transcription error. The DON verified the primary pharmacy was unable to obtain the medication and attempted to contact a secondary pharmacy that was unable to obtain the medication. No communication from the pharmacy was provided to the facility until 02/19/23 regarding the status of the medication.

Review of Paxlovid manufacturer indications for use, revised February 2023, instructed to initiate Paxlovid treatment as soon as possible after diagnosis of COVID-19 and within five days of symptom onset.

This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00140774.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
August 25, 2022Certification survey · 95.1% of codes compliant (state average 88.48%)5 deficiencies▼
F-0677ADL Care Provided for Dependent ResidentsFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0439, N-0360, N-0559 · correction confirmed 10/09/2022▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care and grooming was provided to a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 19.

Findings include:

Medical record review revealed Resident #7 admitted to the facility on 03/21/22 with the diagnoses including, hepatic failure, osteoarthritis, gastrostomy, dysphagia, dementia, protein calorie malnutrition, acute kidney failure, pancytopenia, glaucoma, depression, hypertension, and hypothyroidism.

According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 07/15/22, Resident #7 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for the completion of ADLs.

Review of the care plan dated 07/22/22 revealed Resident #7 had ADL self-care deficit and physical mobility deficit related to decrease in ability to perform ADLs, difficulty with mobility, and increase dependence for most ADLs. Interventions included the following: ensure glasses are clean, assistance with mobility as needed, check nail length, trim and clean on bath day and as necessary and report any changes to the nurse, requires total dependence of one person with bathing, totally dependent to reposition and move in bed with assistance of two persons, assist to choose simple comfortable clothing that enhances ability to dress self, totally dependent with dressing with the assistance of one person, brush teeth, rinse mouth with wash, requires total dependence with assistance of one person for toileting, and encourage to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction.

Review of task completion documentation from 07/26/22 to 08/24/22 noted Resident #7 required full staff performance and was totally dependent upon staff for the completion of maintaining personal hygiene.

Observations on 08/22/22 at 12:51 P.M. and 3:51 P.M. noted Resident #7 in bed wearing a hospital gown. The resident had matted hair to the back of her head, lips with pealing skin and oral cavity with dry mucous membranes, a dark substance under fingernails of both hands, and multiple grey hairs to her chin measuring approximately one inch.

Observations on 08/23/22 at 8:55 A.M., 11:46 A.M., and 3:18 P.M. noted Resident #7 in bed a shirt with an adult brief without pants. The resident had matted hair to the back of her head, lips with pealing skin and oral cavity with dry mucous membranes, a dark substance under fingernails of both hands, multiple grey hairs to her chin measuring approximately one inch.

Observations 08/24/22 at 6:10 A.M. and 9:16 A.M. noted Resident #7 in bed wearing hospital gown. The resident had matted hair to the back of her head, lips with pealing skin and oral cavity with dry mucous membranes, a dark substance under fingernails of both hands, and multiple grey hairs to her chin measuring approximately one inch. The resident had glasses on and the lenses had a film and debris to the lens surface.

Interview and observation on 08/24/22 at 9:30 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #431 verified Resident #7 had long hair on her face, matted hair to her head, dark substance under fingernails to both hands, dry oral cavity with dry skin clinging to the lips and debris to glasses. STNA #431 verified providing care to Resident #7 on 08/23/22 and 08/24/22. STNA #431 stated the resident was resistant to personal care, however, she did not report the resistant interactions to the nurse for further guidance.

Interview on 08/24/22 at 9:20 A.M. with the Director of Nursing verified Resident #7 was dependent upon staff for the completion of ADLs and confirmed the resident was not provided sufficient care to carry out ADLs.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0689Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/DevicesFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0437 · correction confirmed 10/09/2022▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as care planned. This affected one (Resident #10) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 19.

Findings include:

Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/22/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, heart disease, alcohol abuse, depression, protein calorie malnutrition, cognitive communication deficit, and repeated falls.

Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/26/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Resident #10 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #10 displayed no behaviors during the review period. Resident #10 was noted to have had a fall prior to admission but none at the time of the review.

Review of Resident #10's care plan revised 08/01/22 revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit and the resident was at risk for falls. Fall interventions included anticipating needs, ensuring his call light was in reach, and ensure he had access to a working and reachable call light.

Review of Resident #10's Fall Risk Assessment dated 07/22/22 revealed Resident #10 was at high risk for falls.

Observation on 08/22/22 at 10:35 A.M. of Resident #10 found him in his room alone, seated on the front edge of the seat of his wheelchair, leaning forward out of his wheelchair, reaching down toward the floor. Resident #10 was unstable and appeared close to falling. Coinciding interview with Resident #10 revealed he was trying to reach his call light. Resident #10 reported he was looking for it and when he found it, it was stuck under the recliner. Resident #10 stated he was not sure how it got there or how long it was there but he needed to have it. A sign was noted on the wall of Resident #10's room reminding Resident #10 to use his call light for assistance. Closer inspection of the call light found it was stuck in the gears of the recliner.

Interview on 08/22/22 at 10:40 A.M. with Physical Therapist (PT) #454 verified Resident #10 was at risk for falls, his call light was not in reach and the call light was stuck in the gears of his recliner. PT #454 dislodged the call light chord and provided the call light to Resident #10.

Review of the facility policy titled, Falls Management revised 12/03/19 revealed the facility was to institute interventions to prevent a further fall.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0759Free of Medication Error Rates of 5% or MoreFederal citation · also cited by Ohio as N-0533 · correction confirmed 10/09/2022▼
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of the medication administration policy, the facility failed to ensure two medications of 26 were provided within prescribed timeframe's, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69 percent (%). This affected one (Resident #7) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 19.

Findings include:

Observation on 08/23/22 at 11:40 A.M. noted Registered Nurse (RN) #429 obtained Resident #7's medications from the medication cart to prepare them for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) administration. Medications included omeprazole suspension two milligrams (mg) per (/) one milliliter (ml) equaling 10 ml in a medication cup and Lorazepam 0.5 mg crushed and placed into a medication cup. RN #429 proceeded to Resident #7's room and administered the medications via G-tube. Interview with with RN #429 revealed the medications were ordered twice daily by the physician and were scheduled for 10:00 A.M. However, RN #429 was running behind.

Review of Resident #7's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/06/22 for omeprazole suspension two milligrams (mg) per (/) one milliliter (ml) equaling 10 ml to be administered every day shift between and evening shift.

No specified times were included. Continued review revealed an order dated 08/16/22 for Lorazepam 0.5 mg administered two times a day for anxiety and restlessness. Scheduled times were 10:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M.

Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the omeprazole suspension was scheduled for 6:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. and Lorazepam was scheduled for 10:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M.

Interview on 08/24/22 at 3:05 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified Resident #7's medications were not administered within established timeframes.

According to medication administration policy revised on 08/30/16, medications ordered two times daily are administered at 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. with an hour time before and after the designated times.

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0812Food Procurement,Store/Prepare/Serve-SanitaryFederal citation · correction confirmed 10/09/2022▼
What the surveyor found

Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure frozen food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner and ventilation ducts were kept clean. This had the potential to affect all 19 residents in the facility. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Observation on 08/22/22 at 9:33 A.M. of the walk in freezer found ice build up along the edge of the door, preventing the door from closing properly. Ice was built up on the inside of the door and covered the bars and racks on the shelving unit along with the boxes of food items on the shelves. The food items were not able to be identified due to the ice build up. Removal of some of the ice crystals from the front of the boxes found they contained breadsticks, pretzel buns, burritos, strawberry rhubarb pie, cherry pie and whipped topping. Also, boxes were found being stored on the floor containing chicken and tiramisu desserts. In addition, a large box of frozen peas was found to be open, uncovered, and unlabeled. Interview on 08/22/22 at 9:36 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #419 verified the peas were not in use and were most likely left open from the day before, the boxes of chicken and tiramisu were stored on the floor and there was ice built up on the side of the door, the shelves, and food boxes. DM #419 reported the seal on the door most likely needed to be replaced again or one of the staff did not ensure it was closed tightly. Observation on 08/23/22 at 9:56 A.M. of the walk in freezer found ice build up continued to be on the inside of the door, the shelves, and breadsticks, pretzel buns, burritos, strawberry rhubarb pie, cherry pie, and whipped topping. 2. Observation on 08/22/22 at 9:27 A.M. of the ceiling ducts above the preparation area in the kitchen and dishwashing area, found dusty-brown/gray buildup, consistent with the appearance of dust, on the ventilation slats of the duct work. Interview on 08/22/22 at 9:30 A.M. with DM #419 verified there was dust build up on the ventilation duct work. DM #419 reported the local health department had completed an inspection and noted the same concern. DM #419 reported maintenance completed the cleaning of the vents and she would make a report again to have them address the dust as she did not think it had been taken care of from the previous inspection. Interview on 08/25/22 at 12:15 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the walk in freezer was last serviced on 06/30/22. The Administrator showed photographs of the ventilation ducts having been cleaned of dust. The Administrator provided documented training that was held on 06/09/22 which included a server cleaning schedule and cook duties. None of the training included cleaning of the walk in cooler/freezer or the vents. The Administrator reported they had no food borne illnesses, and no complaints from resident council regarding food. Review of the Food Inspection Report dated 04/21/22 revealed the local health department had a non-critical finding of build up on the shelving in the the walk in cooler and observed build up on fan and ceiling in the dish wash area. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage and ProcurementBased on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure frozen food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner and ventilation ducts were kept clean. This had the potential to affect all 19 residents in the facility. The facility census was 19.

Findings include:

Observation on 08/22/22 at 9:33 A.M. of the walk in freezer found ice build up along the edge of the door, preventing the door from closing properly. Ice was built up on the inside of the door and covered the bars and racks on the shelving unit along with the boxes of food items on the shelves. The food items were not able to be identified due to the ice build up. Removal of some of the ice crystals from the front of the boxes found they contained breadsticks, pretzel buns, burritos, strawberry rhubarb pie, cherry pie and whipped topping. Also, boxes were found being stored on the floor containing chicken and tiramisu desserts. In addition, a large box of frozen peas was found to be open, uncovered, and unlabeled.

Interview on 08/22/22 at 9:36 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #419 verified the peas were not in use and were most likely left open from the day before, the boxes of chicken and tiramisu were stored on the floor and there was ice built up on the side of the door, the shelves, and food boxes. DM #419 reported the seal on the door most likely needed to be replaced again or one of the staff did not ensure it was closed tightly.

Observation on 08/23/22 at 9:56 A.M. of the walk in freezer found ice build up continued to be on the inside of the door, the shelves, and breadsticks, pretzel buns, burritos, strawberry rhubarb pie, cherry pie, and whipped topping.

2. Observation on 08/22/22 at 9:27 A.M. of the ceiling ducts above the preparation area in the kitchen and dishwashing area, found dusty-brown/gray buildup, consistent with the appearance of dust, on the ventilation slats of the duct work.

Interview on 08/22/22 at 9:30 A.M. with DM #419 verified there was dust build up on the ventilation duct work. DM #419 reported the local health department had completed an inspection and noted the same concern. DM #419 reported maintenance completed the cleaning of the vents and she would make a report again to have them address the dust as she did not think it had been taken care of from the previous inspection.

Interview on 08/25/22 at 12:15 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the walk in freezer was last serviced on 06/30/22. The Administrator showed photographs of the ventilation ducts having been cleaned of dust. The Administrator provided documented training that was held on 06/09/22 which included a server cleaning schedule and cook duties. None of the training included cleaning of the walk in cooler/freezer or the vents. The Administrator reported they had no food borne illnesses, and no complaints from resident council regarding food.

Review of the Food Inspection Report dated 04/21/22 revealed the local health department had a non-critical finding of build up on the shelving in the the walk in cooler and observed build up on fan and ceiling in the dish wash area.

Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage and Procurement

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
F-0880Infection Prevention and ControlFederal citation · correction confirmed 10/09/2022▼
What the surveyor found

Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure facility staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when in contact with a resident on Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). This affected one (Resident #12) of two residents reviewed for TBP. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on 07/24/22 with the diagnoses including, gangrene to right leg, right foot amputation, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, hypothyroidism, history of venous thrombosis and embolism, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lymphedema, macular degeneration, and myocardial infarction. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 07/28/22, Resident #12 was alert, oriented, and able to make needs known. The resident was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation indicating Resident #12 was vaccinated for COVID-19. Review of Resident #12's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/18/22 for Resident #12 to be placed in COVID-19 isolation per facility protocol due to unvaccinated status. Observation on 08/22/22 at 3:47 P.M. noted Resident #12 in their room with a sign posted on the door noting the resident was in droplet isolation. There was a cabinet with PPE placed outside the door. Observation on 08/23/22 at 1:10 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #429 was observed in Resident #12's room, standing at the bedside. RN #429 was wearing a face shield and N95 mask. RN #429 was not wearing any additional PPE, including gloves or a gown. The droplet isolation sign was still posted to Resident #12's door. Interview on 08/23/22 at 3:50 P.M. with RN #429 confirmed when in Resident #12's room, staff were to wear full PPE due to the resident being in droplet isolation. RN #429 stated she was unaware full PPE was required when in the residents room. Interview on 08/24/22 at 8:03 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified RN #429 was required to wear full PPE (gown, gloves, eye protection, and N95 mask) when entering and working with Resident #12. The DON indicated due to the resident being unvaccinated for COVID-19 and going out to appointments in a healthcare setting on 08/22/22, the resident was in droplet isolation for seven days. Additional observation on 08/25/22 at 6:14 A.M. noted State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #440 in Resident #12's room assisting the resident at the bedside. STNA #440 was wearing surgical gloves, an N95 mask, and a face shield applied. STNA #440 was not wearing a gown. Interview on 08/25/22 at 6:20 A.M. with the DON verified STNA #440 should have applied all PPE, including a gown due to Resident #12 being placed on droplet isolation. According to the facility's COVID-19 policy dated 02/07/22 revealed new residents or those that have been readmitted and are not up to date with vaccines, are required to quarantine in their private room with transmission based precautions on the appropriate unit, for 10 days or seven days with a negative test within 48 hours or longer if showing signs and symptoms. Place precaution signage on resident door. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required includes: Gloves, isolation gowns, facemask, respiratory protection N95 masks or equivalent are recommended, eye protection that covers both the front and sides of the face, hand hygiene using Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer before and after all patient contact, contact with infectious material and before and after removal of PPE, including gloves if hands are soiled, washing hands with soap and water is required for at least 20 seconds. Review of CDC guidance titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) PandemicBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure facility staff wore proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when in contact with a resident on Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). This affected one (Resident #12) of two residents reviewed for TBP. The facility census was 19.

Findings include:

Medical record review revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on 07/24/22 with the diagnoses including, gangrene to right leg, right foot amputation, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, hypothyroidism, history of venous thrombosis and embolism, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lymphedema, macular degeneration, and myocardial infarction.

According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 07/28/22, Resident #12 was alert, oriented, and able to make needs known. The resident was dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living.

Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation indicating Resident #12 was vaccinated for COVID-19.

Review of Resident #12's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/18/22 for Resident #12 to be placed in COVID-19 isolation per facility protocol due to unvaccinated status.

Observation on 08/22/22 at 3:47 P.M. noted Resident #12 in their room with a sign posted on the door noting the resident was in droplet isolation. There was a cabinet with PPE placed outside the door.

Observation on 08/23/22 at 1:10 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #429 was observed in Resident #12's room, standing at the bedside. RN #429 was wearing a face shield and N95 mask. RN #429 was not wearing any additional PPE, including gloves or a gown. The droplet isolation sign was still posted to Resident #12's door.

Interview on 08/23/22 at 3:50 P.M. with RN #429 confirmed when in Resident #12's room, staff were to wear full PPE due to the resident being in droplet isolation. RN #429 stated she was unaware full PPE was required when in the residents room.

Interview on 08/24/22 at 8:03 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified RN #429 was required to wear full PPE (gown, gloves, eye protection, and N95 mask) when entering and working with Resident #12. The DON indicated due to the resident being unvaccinated for COVID-19 and going out to appointments in a healthcare setting on 08/22/22, the resident was in droplet isolation for seven days.

Additional observation on 08/25/22 at 6:14 A.M. noted State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #440 in Resident #12's room assisting the resident at the bedside. STNA #440 was wearing surgical gloves, an N95 mask, and a face shield applied. STNA #440 was not wearing a gown.

Interview on 08/25/22 at 6:20 A.M. with the DON verified STNA #440 should have applied all PPE, including a gown due to Resident #12 being placed on droplet isolation.

According to the facility's COVID-19 policy dated 02/07/22 revealed new residents or those that have been readmitted and are not up to date with vaccines, are required to quarantine in their private room with transmission based precautions on the appropriate unit, for 10 days or seven days with a negative test within 48 hours or longer if showing signs and symptoms. Place precaution signage on resident door. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) required includes: Gloves, isolation gowns, facemask, respiratory protection N95 masks or equivalent are recommended, eye protection that covers both the front and sides of the face, hand hygiene using Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizer before and after all patient contact, contact with infectious material and before and after removal of PPE, including gloves if hands are soiled, washing hands with soap and water is required for at least 20 seconds.

Review of CDC guidance titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

Rule
42 CFR 483 - federal nursing home requirements
August 16, 2022Complaint survey · listed in Ohio's index; no findings report publishedNo deficiencies▼
✅
No deficiencies cited
Ohio lists this visit in its inspection index with no deficiencies. The state publishes a findings report only when a visit cites something, so there is no further detail to show.