10
Inspections
25
Deficiencies
0
Actual Harm or Above
15
Occurrences
June 17, 2026
Last Inspection
S/S A/B/C Minimal potentialS/S E Potential for harm
The most recent inspection of WILLOWBROOK PLACE on record is dated June 17, 2026. Across 10 published inspections, state surveyors cited 25 deficiencies, none of which reached the actual-harm level.
Colorado publishes inspections on a rolling window, so older surveys may no longer appear. Citation codes 0000 and 9999 are the surveyor's opening and closing comments, not deficiencies, and are excluded from the counts above. Where the state required one, the facility's own plan of correction is shown beneath the finding it answers.
Provider Information
Status
Active
Facility Type
Assisted Living Residence (Licensed Only)
Administrator
Prahl, Lebana
Owner
Littleton Kipling 5275, LLC
Phone
(303) 948-3838
Payor Source
Private Pay
City
LITTLETON
ZIP
80127
Inspections & Citations
10 inspections · 25 deficiencies6/17/2026Licensure (Re-licensure) · ID Y14S11No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
An administrative relicensure survey was completed on 06/24/26. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
3/17/2026Licensure Complaint · ID 4MW3117 deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO41796 and #CO41799, was completed on 3/18/26. Deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0680Prsnl-PCW Obs/Doc CmptS/S B▼
Findings
Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to observe and document personal care worker (staff) had demonstrated their ability to completely perform every personal task assigned (comp-check), and each time a worker is assigned a new task, for two (#1, #2) of six sampled staff files, affecting 32 current residents. (Cross-reference U3074)Findings Include:A review of staff files revealed that Staff #1, hired 2/28/24, and Staff #2, hired 1/16/26, did not have a documented competency check by a designated supervisor. A review of the February and March 2026 staff schedule revealed that Staff #2 worked performing personal tasks independently for 29 shifts. In an interview with Staff #6 on 1/27/26 at 8:00 a.m., she explained that Staff #1 is "the jack of all trades." Who helped out with everything from caregiving to maintenance. Staff #1 stated in an interview that on 3/17/26 at 9:44 a.m., she was in fact hired as a housekeeper and was not provided the initial caregiver training. She explained that she received the training as new tasks were added. She stated that she had worked many caregiver shifts, including overnights. During an interview with Staff #2 on 3/17/26 at 10:15 a.m., she explained that the staff is provided a pamphlet for every new resident that goes over all of their care needs, and they sign off that they were informed, but this does not happen when there is a change to the care and services to a resident. The administrator acknowledged that Staff #1 did work as a caregiver and confirmed that Staff #1 and #2 did not have documented comp-checks in an interview on 3/17/26 at 1:44 p.m.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
1. Corrective Action Taken for Affected Staff:Staff #1 and Staff #2 were immediately removed from independent caregiving duties. Both staff completed full competency evaluations for all personal care tasks under direct observation by a designated supervisor. Staff #1 was reassigned to housekeeping until all competencies were completed. 2. Systemic Changes Implemented:A standardized Resident Care Assistant Competency Validation Checklist was implemented for all RCAs. No staff may be scheduled independently until all required competencies are documented and signed. 3. Measures to Prevent Recurrence:Staff Development Director will verify competency documentation before any staff member is added to the schedule. Supervisors will complete competency checks each time a new task is assigned, as required by regulation. 4. Monitoring:The Administrator or designee will audit 100% of new hire files weekly for 90 days, then monthly thereafter. Results will be reviewed during monthly QA meetings. Completion Date: 05/30/2026
0684Prsnl-PCW Cmply P/PS/S B▼
Findings
Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to ensure that each personal care worker (staff) complied with all assisted living residence policies and procedures, as well as their job description and residents' care plan, for two (#1, #3) of six sampled staff files, affecting 32 current residents. (Cross-reference U1352)Findings Include:1. ReferencesThe residence's staff standards of conduct policy, undated, read in part: "The standards set forth are examples of conduct that may lead to disciplinary action, possibly including immediate termination. ... Falsification, Alteration, or Dishonesty regarding medical information, records, or any other document(s) ... Failure to follow instructions or Company policies and/or procedures ... Dishonesty."The residence's "Ongoing Resident Evaluation" policy, dated 5/20/22, read in part: "All staff members informally monitor residnets a regular basis throughout the course of normal daily activities, and to report any changes in condition that are identified."2. Resident Record ReviewResident #2 was admitted to the residence on 12/31/25 with diagnoses of vascular dementia, severe seizure disorder, coronary artery disease, type two diabetes mellitus, pulmonary hypertension, alcohol dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and osteoporosis. A progress note dated 3/12/26 at 8:44 p.m. read in part: "Resident ok after readmission. She had been good today up until bedtime when (husband) left, she proceeded to scream the whole evening, but calmed down after lying down in bed. The next progress note, dated 3/13/26 at 1:55 p.m., read in part: "At 1130 when the resident awoke for the day, a 2-inch bruise/lump was discovered on the left side of the head. Reported to CSD/POA (interim wellness nurse/husband). Advised by POA to call non-emergency to evaluate the resident. Resident sent out via EMS at 1300 to ED for further evaluation."3. Personnel Files Reviewa. Staff #3Staff #3 hired on 3/17/25, a "Job Coaching Meeting" transcript, which read in part: Staff #3 received a "Final Written Notice" on 10/6/25 for documenting that she had conducted resident checks and performed care tasks for residents on 10/3/25, when in fact three residents were found to be soiled and unchecked. "This action/inaction put our residents at risk of harm and/or injury."A review of the March 2026 staff schedule revealed that Staff #3 worked the overnight shift on 3/12/26 into 3/13/26 and on 3/13/26 into 3/14/26. A "Workplace Investigation Report" dated 3/14/26 read in part: "On the morning of March 13, 2026, I reported to my Job as a caregiver at 6 am. I came in to do crossover and was informed by the overnight caregiver that all the residents had been changed, including the resident in room [217] (Resident #2). She can be difficult at times, but had been changed. I did go in to check her, and she was sleeping, so I did a visual check, and she was dry. I noticed that there was a lot of urine on the floor at the bottom of the bed next to a ripped-up floor mat, so I cleaned the floor, picked up the floor mat, and took it to the trash room. I went back to the common room next to the kitchen, and the caregiver had left the qmap asked me if we could go and make sure that the resident in the next room had been changed because her family and nurse were on their way, so we went in to check and had to change her as well. I proceeded to my next resident, and he was also very wet. He is a two-person assist, so the qmap helped me get him up and changed. I went on to my next resident she was also wet, which required her to get a shower. It was time to go back to the kitchen to serve breakfast, so I did go back to room [217] (Resident #2) to check on the resident and ask her if she would like to eat she said no I asked her if she would like to get up ans she said no i did check to see fi she was we she was sent so I let her sleep. I did go in around 10, and she was still sleeping. I went in one more time, and she was still sleeping. Her husband came in around 11. I told him she was still sleeping, and he said that she did that quite often when she was home. That was fine. I went to lunch, and when I came back, her husband said she was awake and that I could go in and get her up. I went and got her up, took her to the restroom, and proceeded to get her read for the day, and that is when I noticed the big goose egg on the right side of her head. I called the qmap over, and she called the nurse (Interim wellness nurse). The nurse did some visual, and with some discussion, the nurse and husband sent her out."In an electronic communication sent by Staff #6 to the administrator on 3/14/26 at 11:40 a.m., read in part: "On the morning of 3/13 at 0600, I went into room 217 (Resident #2) with the caregiver on duty. The room was in disarray urine on the floor. Checked on the resident with the caregiver to make sure the resident's depend was dry and left. Due to the combative nature of the resident, and the fact that the resident had just returned from the hospital, did not want to awaken the resident. The caregiver proceeded to tidy up the room. I was not present in the room during this time. At 1130 I was called into room 217. The resident was already in a wheelchair, and I was shown a large lump and bruise on the side of her head by caregiver on staff and POA (husband). CSD (Interim wellness nurse) had already been notified at that point. Husband and the nurse determined the resident to be sent out non-emergency."The interim wellness nurse (IWN) sent an electronic communication, titled "Employee Concern" to the administrator on 3/14/26 at 3:12 p.m., which read in part: "[Staff #8] has informed me that today (and also most days), [Staff #3] does not want to round and tells her that everyone is clean and dry, then leaves. [Staff #6] backed her up and said that they both refused to sign off on the shift crossover forms because of this. This reason is such an issue, especially today, because of [Resident #2] having what appears to be a pretty significant fall last night and [Staff #3] not knowing it. [Staff #6] said when she checked all the residents on her pod this morning, they were all wet, and [Staff #3] specifically said 'even [Resident #2] is clean and dry'; however, she was not. ... I'm concerned that no one knew that [Resident #2] hit her head, and they assumed because she was sleeping that they were going to leave her alone. I'm sure she has a concussion at least."b. Staff #1A review of the file for Staff #1 revealed a hire date of 2/28/24. The file included a "HOUSEKEEPER" job description which read in part: "Under general supervision, performs a variety of custodial/housekeeping duties for residents; sweeps, mops, and uses vacuum cleaners to clean floors; dusts, cleans bathroom fixtures and floors". The Job description did not include any personal care worker duties. 4. InterviewsStaff #6 on 3/17/26 at 8:00 a.m., she explained that Staff #1 is "the jack of all trades." Who helped out with everything from caregiving to maintenance. Staff #1 stated on 3/17/26 at 9:44 a.m., she was in fact hired as a housekeeper and was not provided the initial caregiver training. She explained that she received the training as new tasks were added; however, no documentation was provided. She stated that she had worked many caregiver shifts, including overnights. The administrator on 3/17/26 at 1:44 p.m. acknowledged that Staff #1 did work as a caregiver. On 3/18/25 at 12:15 p.m., the administrator confirmed that the events that occurred on 10/3/25 were the "second of three strikes" for Staff #3. Additionally, the administrator confirmed that all of the details provided by Staff #6 and #8 were provided as part of an ongoing investigation. He further added that Staff #3 had been suspended pending the investigation. He explained that the communication from the IWN was her report to him about the report from the two staff members. Finally, the administrator stated that if it were determined that Staff #3 falsified documentation, she would have violated the residence's policies and procedures. He also added that this determination had not yet been made by the residence and that the investigation was still pending.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective Action Taken:Staff #1 was reassigned to housekeeping until fully trained and validated. Staff #3 was suspended pending investigation. Documentation audits were initiated immediately. Systemic Changes Implemented:All staff job descriptions were reviewed, updated, and reissued. Staff signed acknowledgments confirming understanding of their roles and scope of practice. The shift-to-shift verification form was reviewed with staff and staff signed acknowledgement of the shift-to-shift procedure. Measures to Prevent Recurrence:Supervisors will verify that staff are working within their assigned roles each shift. Staff will receive retraining on documentation expectations and care plan adherence. Monitoring:Random audits of 10% of shift documentation weekly for 12 weeks will be conducted. All shift-to-shift verification forms will be reviewed upon submission for 90 days, then weekly thereafter. Any discrepancies will result in corrective action. Completion Date: 05/30/2026What is the residence's plan to ensure staff are completing all tasks as required, and not just documenting completion?The residence will ensure staff are completing required tasks by implementing the following:Direct supervisory observation each shift to confirm that care tasks listed in the care plan are being performed as written. Real-time comparison of documentation to observed care, including spot checks of resident status, room conditions, and care outcomes. Shift-to-shift verification, already referenced in the POC: “The shift-to-shift verification form was reviewed with staff and staff signed acknowledgement of the shift-to-shift procedure.”Immediate corrective action when discrepancies are identified, consistent with the POC statement: “Any discrepancies will result in corrective action.”How will the residence ensure staff are providing resident care, as required?The residence will ensure staff provide required resident care by:Supervisors verifying that staff are working within their assigned roles each shift, as stated in the POC: “Supervisors will verify that staff are working within their assigned roles each shift.”Retraining staff on care plan adherence, ensuring they understand and follow individualized resident needs: “Staff will receive retraining on documentation expectations and care plan adherence.”Using the shift-to-shift verification form to confirm that required care tasks were completed and communicated. Conducting random audits of shift documentation, which helps identify gaps in care delivery: “Random audits of 10% of shift documentation weekly for 12 weeks will be conducted.”The monitoring plan must identify all of the following:Exactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring;The residence will review:Shift documentation for accuracy, completeness, and alignment with resident care plans. Shift-to-shift verification forms to ensure required tasks were completed and communicated. Direct observation findings, comparing observed care to documented care. Care plan adherence, ensuring staff actions match resident-specific requirements. The sample, representative of the facility census, included in the monitoring;A 10% sample of all shifts will be reviewed weekly. The sample will include all three shifts, weekdays and weekends, and a mix of staff roles (RCAs, QMAPs, etc.). Residents included in the review will represent varying care needs (ADL assistance, medication support, memory care, etc.). How often the monitoring will occur;Weekly review of 10% of shift documentation for at least 12 weeks (as stated in the POC). Daily review of shift-to-shift verification forms for the first 90 days, then weekly thereafter. How the monitoring will be documented;A Shift-to-Shift Verification Review Log. A Direct Observation Record completed by supervisors. All findings will be stored in the QA binder. Each entry will include date, shift, staff reviewed, findings, corrective actions, and follow-up. The total minimum length of time the monitoring will continue (a minimum of 3 months isrequired)Monitoring will continue for:120 days of documentation audits120 days of shift-to-shift form reviewHow the monitoring will be included in the QAPI process. All audit results will be reviewed during monthly QA meetings, consistent with the facility’s existing QA structure. Trends, deficiencies, and corrective actions will be documented in the QAPI dashboard. Persistent issues will trigger root cause analysis and additional staff training. QAPI will determine whether monitoring can be reduced, continued, or expanded.
1150Res Care Srvs-Res CPS/S A▼
Findings
Based on record review and interviews, the residence failed to ensure the care plan for Former Resident #6 (FR#6) was developed with input from the resident's representative (RR). Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to ensure that care plans were developed with the input of the resident's representative, affecting one of the two former sample residents (#6). Findings Include:A review of the care plan for Former Resident #6 (FR#6), dated 1/20/26, failed to include any evidence that the resident's representative had input into the development of the care plan. Meeting notes written by the resident representative for FR#6 of a meeting with the former administrator on 1/13/26 read in part: "I would like to be part of the development of his care plan. I think it is being created now."In an interview with the RR on 3/17/26 at 9:49 a.m., she stated, "I was not involved in the care planning. I don't even know if they got around to developing a full one."On 3/18/26 at 12:15 p.m., the administrator stated that he was aware of the requirement that resident care plans be developed with input from the resident's representative. He explained that they had regular care conferences with the residents' representatives, and normally, there would be a document signed by all present parties. He added that this had not been happening as required.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective Action Taken:All current resident care plans were reviewed to ensure representative involvement. Representatives were contacted to confirm participation and provide input. Systemic Changes Implemented:The Care Plan Conference Form requiring signatures of all participants was reviewed and will be utilized for any care plan adjustments. Care plan meetings will occur at admission, bi-annually, and with any significant change. Measures to Prevent Recurrence:The administrator will be notified immediately by the Clinical Services Director when a new assessment is completed that adjusts a resident’s care plan. The administrator will schedule a Care Conference with the resident representative immediately upon notification of these changes. Care plans will not be finalized in the EHR until representative input is documented. Monitoring:The Clinical Services Director will audit 10 care plans monthly for 6 months. Completion Date: 05/30/2026Exactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring;The Clinical Services Director (CSD) will review:Care plans to verify that representative input is documented before finalization. Care Plan Conference Forms, ensuring all required signatures (resident, representative, staff) are present. “The Care Plan Conference Form requiring signatures of all participants was reviewed and will be utilized…”EHR care plan revision history, confirming no care plan was finalized without representative involvement. Communication logs (phone logs, emails, meeting notes) to confirm representatives were contacted and given the opportunity to participate. Assessment-to-care-plan workflow, ensuring that: “Care plans will not be finalized in the EHR until representative input is documented.”Each audit will check for:Representative notificationRepresentative participation or documented attemptsCompleted signaturesTimely scheduling of care conferencesAlignment between assessment changes and updated care plansThe sample, representative of the facility census, included in the monitoring;10 care plans per month, as stated in the POC. “The Clinical Services Director will audit 10 care plans monthly…”The sample will include:Residents from all care levels (independent, assisted, memory care). Residents with recent assessments, significant changes, or new admissions. A mix of residents with active representatives and those with limited or hard-to-reach representatives. This ensures the sample reflects the full resident population and care-planning needs. How often the monitoring will occur;Monthly audits, consistent with the POC. “Audit 10 care plans monthly…”Additional spot checks will occur whenever a new assessment triggers a care plan change. How the monitoring will be documented;A Care Plan Representative Involvement Audit Tool, capturing:Resident nameDate of assessmentDate representative was contactedMethod of contactRepresentative participation (yes/no)Signatures present on Care Plan Conference FormWhether the care plan was finalized only after representative inputCorrective actions takenAll completed audits will be stored in the QAPI binder and electronically in the facility’s shared drive. Documentation will include trends, deficiencies, and follow-up actions. The total minimum length of time the monitoring will continue (a minimum of 3 months isrequired)Monitoring will continue for 6 months: “Audit 10 care plans monthly for 6 months.”How the monitoring will be included in the QAPI process. Audit results will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meetings. The QAPI meetings will:Track trends in representative participationIdentify barriers (e.g., unreachable representatives, scheduling issues)Recommend corrective actions or policy adjustmentsDetermine whether additional staff training is neededPersistent issues will trigger a root cause analysis and targeted interventions. QAPI will determine when monitoring can be reduced or must be extended beyond 6 months.
1352Res Rghts Rts/Rspn-Choice/Invlv Cr/Svc-CommS/S C▼
Findings
Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to provide maximum degree of benefit, affecting one current resident (#2). (Cross-reference U0684)Specifically, the residence failed to coordinate "face-to-face" safety checks to ensure Resident #2 remained "safe from any harm" and two-hour checks while sleeping, as directed in the care plan dated 3/7/2. Progress notes showed Resident #2 had increased behaviors including, suicidal ideations on 3/10/26, "behaviors" on 3/11/26, "screaming the whole night" on 3/12/26, and a "2-inch" head injury of an unknown origin that went undiscovered from 3/12/26 at 8:44 p.m. to 3/13/26 at 11:30 a.m. Additionally, documentation showed Staff #3 was reprimanded for failure to provide care services on 10/3/25 and was suspended for alleged failure to provide care services on 3/13/26. Findings Include:1. ReferencesThe residence's "Ongoing Resident Evaluation" policy, dated 5/20/22, read in part: "All staff members informally monitor residnets a regular basis throughout the course of normal daily activities, and to report any changes in condition that are identified."2. Resident Record ReviewResident #2 was admitted to the residence on 12/31/25 with diagnoses of vascular dementia, severe seizure disorder, coronary artery disease, type two diabetes mellitus, pulmonary hypertension, alcohol dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and osteoporosis. The care plan for Resident #2, dated 3/7/26, read in part: "[Resident #2] will remain safe from any harm. Safety Check. Face-to-face check on resident status. [Staff] to check on the resident and address any needs. ... Fall Risk. Staff to check the resident every 2 hours when sleeping." The care plan was updated again on 3/13/26 to read, "conduct visual checks on resident every two hours while asleep". No documentation of safety checks being performed was provided. A progress note dated 3/10/26 at 6:22 p.m., read in part: Resident #2 returned to the residence via medical transport and was positioned comfortably in bed. A progress note dated 3/10/26 at 9:57 p.m., read in part: Resident #2 was stating "she would kill herself". A progress note dated 3/11/26 at 5:29 p.m., read in part: Resident #2 was having "behaviors", ordering staff around, yelling at them, and trying to fire them. A progress note dated 3/12/26 at 8:44 p.m., read in part: "Resident ok after readmission. She had been good today up until bedtime when (husband) left, she proceeded to scream the whole evening, but calmed down after lying down in bed. The next progress note, dated 3/13/26 at 1:55 p.m., read in part: "At 1130 when the resident awoke for the day, a 2-inch bruise/lump was discovered on the left side of the head. Reported to CSD/POA (interim wellness nurse/husband). Advised by POA to call non-emergency to evaluate the resident. Resident sent out via EMS at 1300 to ED for further evaluation."The next progress note, dated 3/13/25 at 6:59 p.m., read in part: "Late Entry from 3/13/26 11:45 a.m.: Nurse (interm wellness nurse) notified by resident's POA (husband) of presence of bruising and swelling on right side of head. Upon visual inspection, the resident appears to have a large hematoma on the right side of the forehead/scalp area. She denies pain or headache. Neuro exam conducted by nurse (interm wellness nurse) without deficit. No other injuries noted, and the resident is responding appropriately. Discuss with POA (husband) to review the policy for head strike, and resident was sent out via non-emergent transport to [emergency department (ED)] for evaluation. At 5:30 p.m., a call was received from a representative of the ED to notify that the resident has been assessed and all scans are negative."An additional progress note, dated 3/13/26 at 10:16 p.m., read in part: Resident #2 attempted to try and grab the staff's hair, and an additional staff member was called to assist in redirecting her. Six progress notes marked at "Late Entry" were entered on 3/13/26from 10:41 p.m. to 10:48 p.m. by the interim wellness nurse (IWN). The "Late Entry" dates ranged from 2/17/26 to 3/7/26, and all stated, "Fall intervention added to care plan", followed by an individualized intervention. 3. Personnel Files ReviewStaff #3 hired on 3/17/25, a "Job Coaching Meeting" transcript, which read in part: Staff #3 received a "Final Written Notice" on 10/6/25 for documenting that she had conducted resident checks and performed care tasks for residents on 10/3/25, when in fact three residents were found to be soiled and unchecked. "This action/inaction put our residents at risk of harm and/or injury."A review of the March 2026 staff schedule revealed that Staff #3 worked the overnight shift on 3/12/26 into 3/13/26 and on 3/13/26 into 3/14/26. Staff #3 was suspended from caregiver work pending the investigation, starting 3/14/26. A "Workplace Investigation Report" dated 3/14/26 read in part: "On the morning of March 13, 2026, I reported to my Job as a caregiver at 6 am. I came in to do crossover and was informed by the overnight caregiver that all the residents had been changed, including the resident in room [217] (Resident #2). She can be difficult at times, but had been changed. I did go in to check her, and she was sleeping, so I did a visual check, and she was dry. I noticed that there was a lot of urine on the floor at the bottom of the bed next to a ripped-up floor mat, so I cleaned the floor, picked up the floor mat, and took it to the trash room. I went back to the common room next to the kitchen, and the caregiver had left the qmap asked me if we could go and make sure that the resident in the next room had been changed because her family and nurse were on their way, so we went in to check and had to change her as well. I proceeded to my next resident, and he was also very wet. He is a two-person assist, so the qmap helped me get him up and changed. I went on to my next resident she was also wet, which required her to get a shower. It was time to go back to the kitchen to serve breakfast, so I did go back to room [217] (Resident #2) to check on the resident and ask her if she would like to eat she said no I asked her if she would like to get up ans she said no i did check to see fi she was we she was sent so I let her sleep. I did go in around 10, and she was still sleeping. I went in one more time, and she was still sleeping. Her husband came in around 11. I told him she was still sleeping, and he said that she did that quite often when she was home. That was fine. I went to lunch, and when I came back, her husband said she was awake and that I could go in and get her up. I went and got her up, took her to the restroom, and proceeded to get her read for the day, and that is when I noticed the big goose egg on the right side of her head. I called the qmap over, and she called the nurse (Interim wellness nurse). The nurse did some visual, and with some discussion, the nurse and husband sent her out."In an electronic communication sent by Staff #6 to the administrator on 3/14/26 at 11:40 a.m., read in part: "On the morning of 3/13 at 0600, I went into room 217 (Resident #2) with the caregiver on duty. The room was in disarray urine on the floor. Checked on the resident with the caregiver to make sure the resident's depend was dry and left. Due to the combative nature of the resident, and the fact that the resident had just returned from the hospital, did not want to awaken the resident. The caregiver proceeded to tidy up the room. I was not present in the room during this time. At 1130 I was called into room 217. The resident was already in a wheelchair, and I was shown a large lump and bruise on the side of her head by caregiver on staff and POA (husband). CSD (Interim wellness nurse) had already been notified at that point. Husband and the nurse determined the resident to be sent out non-emergency."The IWN sent an electronic communication, titled "Employee Concern", to the administrator on 3/14/26 at 3:12 p.m., which read in part: "[Staff #8] has informed me that today (and also most days), [Staff #3] does not want to round and tells her that everyone is clean and dry, then leaves. [Staff #6] backed her up and said that they both refused to sign off on the shift crossover forms because of this. This reason is such an issue, especially today, because of [Resident #2] having what appears to be a pretty significant fall last night and [Staff #3] not knowing it. [Staff #6] said when she checked all the residents on her pod this morning, they were all wet, and [Staff #3] specifically said 'even [Resident #2] is clean and dry'; however, she was not. ... I'm concerned that no one knew that [Resident #2] hit her head, and they assumed because she was sleeping that they were going to leave her alone. I'm sure she has a concussion at least."4. InterviewsOn 3/18/25 at 12:15 p.m., the administrator confirmed that Staff #3 had received a final written warning in October for failing to provide care to residents and for falsifying documentation. Additionally, the administrator stated that the investigation into what happened during this situation was still underway and that he could not yet say for sure, adding that Staff #3 had been suspended. He confirmed that if it were determined that Staff #3 had failed to check on Resident #2 throughout the night, the residence would have failed to provide the maximum degree of benefit. The administrator elaborated that Resident #2 can be very resistant to care as well as aggressive, which presented unique challenges for staff.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective Action Taken:All staff were retrained on Resident #2’s care plan requirements, including face-to-face safety checks and two-hour sleeping checks. Resident #2’s safety plan was updated to include enhanced monitoring. Systemic Changes Implemented:A new Safety Check Log requiring real-time documentation was implemented. Supervisors will verify completion of checks each shift. Measures to Prevent Recurrence:Residents with behavioral or fall-risk interventions now have highlighted alerts in the EHR and 24-hour binder. Monitoring:Daily review of safety check logs for 30 days, then weekly for 60 days. Completion Date: 04/30/2026Exactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring;The Administrator or designee will review:Safety Check Logs for accuracy, completeness, and real-time documentation. “A new Safety Check Log requiring real-time documentation was implemented.”Face-to-face safety checks and two-hour sleeping checks to ensure they were completed as required in Resident #2’s care plan. “All staff were retrained on Resident #2’s care plan requirements, including face-to-face safety checks and two-hour sleeping checks.”Supervisor verification records confirming that checks were completed each shift. “Supervisors will verify completion of checks each shift.”EHR alerts and 24-hour binder alerts for residents with behavioral or fall-risk interventions to ensure staff followed highlighted requirements. “Residents with behavioral or fall-risk interventions now have highlighted alerts in the EHR and 24-hour binder.”Each review will check for:Timeliness of checksMissing or late entriesConsistency between documentation and resident conditionSupervisor sign-offsAny deviations from the care plan or safety planThe sample, representative of the facility census, included in the monitoring;The monitoring sample will include:All residents with behavioral interventions, fall-risk interventions, or enhanced monitoring requirements, not only Resident #2. A mix of residents across all shifts, including nights, when safety checks are most critical. A minimum of 10% of all residents with safety-related care plan interventions reviewed weekly after the initial 30-day period. This ensures the sample reflects the facility’s overall risk profile and census. How often the monitoring will occur;Consistent with the POC:Daily review of all safety check logs for the first 30 days. Weekly review of safety check logs for the following 60 days. “Daily review of safety check logs for 30 days, then weekly for 60 days.”Additionally:Supervisors will continue shift-by-shift verification throughout the entire monitoring period. How the monitoring will be documented;Monitoring will be documented using:A Safety Check Audit Tool, capturing:Resident nameRequired check frequencyActual check timesStaff completing checksSupervisor verificationAny missed or late checksCorrective actions takenA Weekly Safety Monitoring Summary prepared by the Administrator or designee. All documentation will be stored in the QAPI binder and electronically in the facility’s shared drive. Each entry will include date, shift, findings, and follow-up. The total minimum length of time the monitoring will continue (a minimum of 3 months isrequired)Monitoring will continue for a total of 90 days, which exceeds the required minimum of 3 months. “Daily review… for 30 days, then weekly for 60 days.”How the monitoring will be included in the QAPI process. All audit findings will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meetings. QAPI will track:Missed or late safety checksTrends in staff complianceEffectiveness of the new Safety Check LogResident outcomes related to safety interventionsPersistent issues will trigger root cause analysis, additional staff training, or revisions to the safety plan process. QAPI will determine whether monitoring can be reduced after 90 days or must be extended.
2214HIR-Gen P/PS/S B▼
Findings
Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to implement a policy and procedure for an effective information management system that allowed for effective continuity of care, affecting 32 current residents. (Cross-reference U2230)Findings Include:On 3/17/26 at 8:05 a.m., all investigations into resident deaths from February and March 2025 were requested from the administrator by electronic communication. At approximately 10:00 a.m., the administrator provided page 8 of 8 from an emergency department (ED) report dated 2/4/26. At approximately 3:00 p.m., the full report was requested from the administrator. At approximately 4:00 p.m., he provided a full ED report for a different resident. In an interview with Staff #2 on 3/17/26 at 10:15 a.m., she explained that the electronic health record (EHR) was not "the best" and does not alert staff when there are changes to the care plans. She explained that the staff will often learn about a new care task at the end of their shift when it is time to document, unless we go looking for changes. She stated that in other residences, their system had a dashboard system that allowed her to see all changes first thing. Staff #2 further explained that they are sometimes informed of changes in person during shift crossover meetings. She added that this did not always result in the accurate transmission of information from one shift to the next. On 3/17/26 at 4:20 p.m., the administrator stated in an interview that staff were updated by the interim wellness nurse (IWN) when changes to resident care plans were made, and that information was included in the "24-hour Binder," which staff are directed to review at the beginning of each shift. The administrator confirmed in an interview at 4:24 p.m. that he was unable to locate the ED report from the investigation of the death of a resident. He explained that the residences no longer had possession of any external provider notes (EPNs) due to a directive from the corporate owner. The administrator stated that he was informed that the corporate owner had deleted all of the digital EPNs. He explained that they were in the process of developing a new process to retain all new EPNs.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective Action Taken:A new process for storing external provider notes (EPNs) was implemented. All available EPNs were re-requested from providers. Systemic Changes Implemented:A Care Plan Change Notification Procedure was implemented, including electronic communication alerts, binder updates, and shift huddle announcements. Measures to Prevent Recurrence:EPNs will be reviewed weekly by the Administrator and cross referenced with sign in logs to verify that all residents seen by a provider have a corresponding EPN in the binder. Administrator will follow up with providers for all missing EPNs. Monitoring:Weekly audits of EPNs and care plan updates for 90 days. Completion Date: 05/30/2026Please provide additional information regarding staff notification of care plan/support changes. To ensure all staff are consistently notified of care plan and support changes, the residence has strengthened and clarified its communication workflow. Building on the systemic changes already described in the POC: “A Care Plan Change Notification Procedure was implemented, including electronic communication alerts, binder updates, and shift huddle announcements.”The following additional details apply:Electronic Alerts: When a care plan or support need changes, the Clinical Services Director (CSD) immediately updates the EHR. The system generates an alert visible to all staff at login. 24-Hour Binder Updates: The CSD or designee updates the binder within 1 hour of any change. Updated pages are highlighted for quick identification. Shift Huddle Announcements: Supervisors announce all care plan/support changes at the beginning of each shift. Staff must verbally confirm understanding. Staff Acknowledgment: Staff sign a Care Plan Change Acknowledgment Log confirming they have reviewed and understand the updated information. Cross-Referencing With Provider Visits: “EPNs will be reviewed weekly by the Administrator and cross referenced with sign in logs to verify that all residents seen by a provider have a corresponding EPN in the binder.” This ensures staff are notified whenever an external provider visit results in a care plan change. These steps ensure that every care plan or support change is communicated through three channels (electronic, written, verbal) and verified through staff acknowledgment. Exactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring;The Administrator or designee will review:All care plan changes entered into the EHR during the audit period. Care Plan Change Notification Procedure compliance, including:Whether electronic alerts were generatedWhether the 24-hour binder was updatedWhether shift huddle announcements were documentedWhether staff signed the Care Plan Change Acknowledgment LogExternal Provider Notes (EPNs) to ensure they were received, filed, and incorporated into care plans. “A new process for storing external provider notes (EPNs) was implemented.”Cross-reference of provider sign-in logs with EPNs to ensure no care plan changes were missed. “Administrator will follow up with providers for all missing EPNs.”Each audit will check for timeliness, accuracy, and completeness of staff notification. The sample, representative of the facility census, included in the monitoring;The monitoring sample will include:All residents who had a care plan change during the audit period. All residents seen by external providers, as identified through sign-in logs. A minimum of 10% of all residents each week, even if no changes occurred, to ensure system-wide compliance. This ensures the sample reflects the full range of resident needs and provider interactions. How often the monitoring will occur;Weekly audits for the entire monitoring period, consistent with the POC: “Weekly audits of EPNs and care plan updates for 90 days.”How the monitoring will be documented;Monitoring will be documented using:A Care Plan Change Audit Tool, capturing:Resident nameType of changeDate/time of changeWhether electronic alerts were issuedWhether binder updates were completedWhether shift huddle announcements were documentedStaff acknowledgment signaturesWhether EPNs were received and filedAny discrepancies and corrective actionsA Weekly Information Management Summary Report prepared by the Administrator. All documentation will be stored in the QAPI binder and electronically in the facility’s shared drive. The total minimum length of time the monitoring will continue (a minimum of 3 months is required)Monitoring will continue for 90 days, which meets and exceeds the required minimum of 3 months. “Weekly audits… for 90 days.”How the monitoring will be included in the QAPI process. Audit results will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meetings. QAPI will track:Timeliness of staff notificationMissing or late EPNsTrends in communication failuresStaff compliance with acknowledgment requirementsPersistent issues will trigger:Root cause analysisAdditional staff trainingRevision of the Care Plan Change Notification ProcedureQAPI will determine whether monitoring should continue beyond 90 days.
2230HIR-Cntnt IncldS/S B▼
Findings
Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to ensure resident records contained documentation of ongoing services provided by external service providers, as well as obtain the final disposition for one former resident (#5), affecting four out of four current sample residents (#1, #2, #3, #4). (Cross-reference U2214)Findings Include:On 3/17/26 at 11:52 a.m., all external provider notes (EPNs) from February and March 2026 for each of the four current sample residents and none were provided. Additionally, the final disposition for Former Resident #5 (FR#5) was requested and not received. In an interview with the administrator on 3/17/26 at 4:24 p.m., he acknowledged that FR#5's file did not have his final disposition, and no EPNs were available. He explained that the residences no longer had possession of any EPNs due to a directive from the corporate owner. The administrator stated that he was informed that the corporate owner had deleted all of the digital EPNs. He explained that they were in the process of developing a new process to retain all new EPNs.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective Action Taken:Final disposition for Former Resident #5 was obtained and added to the record. Providers were contacted to resend missing EPNs. Systemic Changes Implemented:A Resident Record Checklist was implemented for all admissions, discharges, and deaths. Measures to Prevent Recurrence:All external provider notes will be added to the EPN binder within 24 hours of receipt. Monitoring:Monthly audits of 20% of resident records for 6 months. Completion Date: 05/30/2026Exactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring;The Administrator or designee will review the following components of each selected resident record:Resident Record Checklist for completeness at admission, discharge, or death “A Resident Record Checklist was implemented for all admissions, discharges, and deaths.”External Provider Notes (EPNs) to ensure all notes have been received, filed, and entered into the record “Providers were contacted to resend missing EPNs.”Final disposition documentation for any resident who has discharged or expired “Final disposition for Former Resident #5 was obtained and added to the record.”Care plan updates, ensuring all required documents are present and filed in the correct sectionsTimeliness of documentation entry (within 24 hours of receipt, as stated in the POCD for EPNs) “All external provider notes will be added to the EPN binder within 24 hours of receipt.”Each audit will check for missing documents, incomplete sections, misfiled items, and delays in documentation. The sample, representative of the facility census, included in the monitoring;The monitoring sample will include:20% of all active resident records each month, as stated in the POCDA mix of residents who:Were recently admittedRecently dischargedRecently seen by external providersHave complex care plans or multiple providersAt least one record involving a discharge or death each month (if applicable), ensuring the checklist is being used consistentlyThis sample ensures representation across the full range of resident statuses and documentation types. How often the monitoring will occur;Monitoring will occur monthly, consistent with the POCD “Monthly audits of 20% of resident records for 6 months.”How the monitoring will be documented;Monitoring will be documented using:A Resident Record Audit Tool, which will include:Resident nameDate of reviewRequired documents present or missingConfirmation that EPNs were received and filedConfirmation that final disposition documentation is present (if applicable)Verification that the Resident Record Checklist was completedAny discrepancies foundCorrective actions takenA Monthly Resident Record Audit Summary, prepared by the Administrator or designeeAll documentation will be stored in the QAPI binder and electronically in the facility’s shared driveThe total minimum length of time the monitoring will continue (a minimum of 3 months is required)Monitoring will continue for 6 months. “Monthly audits… for 6 months.”How the monitoring will be included in the QAPI process. Audit results will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meetingsQAPI will track:Trends in missing or late documentationFrequency of missing EPNsCompliance with the Resident Record ChecklistTimeliness of final disposition documentationPersistent issues will trigger:Root cause analysisAdditional staff trainingRevision of the Resident Record Checklist or filing proceduresQAPI will determine whether monitoring should continue beyond 6 months based on trends and compliance levels
3074Sec Env-Stff Tr Wrk IndepS/S B▼
Findings
Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to document that each staff member was trained on each resident's care plan, for the five current staff files sampled (#1-#5), affecting 32 current residents. (Cross-reference U0680)Findings Include:On 3/17/26 at 11:52 a.m., a request for the files for Staff #1-#5 to include documented training on each resident's care plan was sent to the administrator via electronic communications. A review of files for Staff #1-#5 revealed no documented training on each resident's care plan. A review of the February and March 2026 staff schedule revealed that Staff #2-#5 had worked consistently, providing care and services to residents. In an interview with Staff #6 on 1/27/26 at 8:00 a.m., she explained that Staff #1 is "the jack of all trades." Who helped out with everything from caregiving to maintenance. Staff #1 stated in an interview that on 1/27/26 at 9:44 a.m., she was in fact hired as a housekeeper and was not provided the initial caregiver training. She explained that she received the training as new tasks were added. She stated that she had worked many caregiver shifts, including overnights. During an interview with Staff #2, she explained that the staff would be provided a pamphlet for every new resident that goes over all of their care needs, and they sign off that they were informed, but this does not happen when there is a change to the care and services to a resident. The administrator acknowledged that Staff #1 did work as a caregiver and confirmed that Staff #2-#5 did not have documented training on each resident care plan and their updates in an interview on 1/27/26 at 1:44 p.m.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective Action Taken:All current staff completed documented training on every resident’s care plan relevant to their duties. Systemic Changes Implemented:A Care Plan Training Log was implemented. New hires must complete care plan training before their first shift. Measures to Prevent Recurrence:Care plan updates now trigger mandatory staff retraining with sign-off. Monitoring:Weekly audits of training logs for 60 days, then monthly. Completion Date: 05/30/2026Exactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring;The Administrator or designee will review:Care Plan Training Logs to verify that all current staff have completed training on every resident’s care plan relevant to their duties. “A Care Plan Training Log was implemented.”New hire files to confirm care plan training was completed before the first shift, as required. “New hires must complete care plan training before their first shift.”Retraining documentation to ensure staff completed mandatory retraining after any care plan update. “Care plan updates now trigger mandatory staff retraining with sign-off.”EHR care plan update history to confirm that training occurred promptly after each change. Staff schedules to ensure no staff member is assigned to resident care before completing required training. Each audit will check for completeness, timeliness, accuracy, and proper staff sign-off. The sample, representative of the facility census, included in the monitoring;The monitoring sample will include:All staff whose duties involve resident care, including RCAs, QMAPs, and supervisors. All new hires during the monitoring period. All residents whose care plans were updated, ensuring staff training was completed for each update. A minimum of 20% of all staff files each month after the initial 60-day period. This ensures the sample reflects the full range of staff roles and resident care needs. How often the monitoring will occur;Consistent with the POCD:Weekly audits of training logs for the first 60 days. “Weekly audits of training logs for 60 days…”Monthly audits thereafter for the remainder of the monitoring period. “…then monthly.”How the monitoring will be documented;Monitoring will be documented using:A Care Plan Training Audit Tool, capturing:Staff nameDate of initial trainingDate of retraining (if applicable)Care plans coveredVerification that training occurred before first shift (for new hires)Verification that retraining occurred after care plan updatesAny discrepancies and corrective actionsA Monthly Training Compliance Summary prepared by the Administrator or designee. All documentation will be stored in the QAPI binder and electronically in the facility’s shared drive. The total minimum length of time the monitoring will continue (a minimum of 3 months is required)Monitoring will continue for a minimum of 3 months, but the facility’s plan already exceeds this requirement:60 days of weekly auditsFollowed by monthly audits “Weekly audits… for 60 days, then monthly.”This meets and exceeds the regulatory minimum. How the monitoring will be included in the QAPI process. Audit results will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meetings. QAPI will track:Staff compliance with initial and ongoing care plan trainingTimeliness of retraining after care plan updatesTrends in missed or late trainingImpact on resident outcomes and care qualityPersistent issues will trigger:Root cause analysisAdditional staff trainingRevision of the Care Plan Training Log or training proceduresQAPI will determine whether monitoring should continue beyond the initial period.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note▼
Findings
THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary. The residence was advised to review and maintain the following processes in accordance with the existing program regulations at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.10.1 The assisted living residence shall have readily available a roster of current residents, their room assignments and emergency contact information, along with a facility diagram showing room locations.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/23/2025Licensure Complaint · ID 070511No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO40971, was completed on 9/23/25. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/23/2025Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID MELF12No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A complaint revisit was completed on 9/23/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 12/24/24. The residence is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. The deficiencies cited for Event MELF11 were cited prior to the regulation revision that was implemented on 7/1/25.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
5/7/2025CHOW and Licensure (Re-licensure) and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID PDRZ11No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO39972 and #CO39986, was completed on 5/7/25. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
12/18/2024Licensure Complaint · ID MELF115 deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38599, was completed on 12/24/24. Deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0664Prsnl-Prsnl Files RqS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence's personnel files failed include first aid certifications for two of three sample staff (#4, #7). On 12/18/24 at 3:07 p.m., a request was made to the administrator or verification of first aid certification for Staff #4, #6 and #7. At 4:07 p.m., the administrator provided a first aid certification for #6 and said human resources was retrieving the remaining two. On 12/19/24 at 9:00 a.m., the administrator said the residence did not have first aid certifications for Staff #4 and #7 and was in the process of obtaining certifications directly from Staff #4 and #7. The administrator added they were aware personnel files were required to include this information.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
NOTE: IDR has been submitted to dispute this deficiency. ActionsStaff Development Director will audit of all current personnel files by January 24th to identify those staff members without CPR and First Aid training. Staff Development Director has scheduled First Aid and CPR training on February 17th and February 20th for all care staff who do not have current CPR and First Aid certificatesCopies of CPR and First Aid certificates will be kept in Personnel files in Staff Development Office and a separate binder in the Executive Director’s officeHow and what will be reviewedED binder containing CPR and First Aid Certificates will continue to be maintained and reviewed with SDD for accuracy. Clinical Staff Schedule will continued to be reviewed to ensure at least 1 staff member with CPR/FA certification is scheduled at all times. Sample included in monitoringMonitoring will cover all QMAPs and Care StaffHow often monitoring will occurED Binder will continue to be reviewed following each CPR/First Aid class held at community. How the monitoring will be documentedMonitoring will continued to be documented on SDD/ED Weekly Meeting notes. How long will monitoring continueMonitoring has been a permanent part of SDD/ED weekly meetings. How will monitoring be part of QAPI processMonitoring will be documented in the monthly QAPI (CQI) notes. ADDENDUM:What process is the agency putting in place to ensure new staff have CPR certification as required? With each clinical staff new hire, SDD and ED will review all certification. If new hire does not have CPR certification, SDD will schedule a new CPR class for all new hires needing certification. ED and SDD will review schedule monthly and with every call off to ensure that there is always a minimum of 1 staff member CPR/First Aid certified in the community.
1180Res Care Srvs-Fall Mgt PrS/S C▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to establish a fall management program which included detailing in each resident's care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risks related to deficits in strength and balance, affecting three of five sample residents (#2-#4). Specifically, the care plan for Resident #4, dated 8/7/24, read Resident #4 required fall risk safety checks with an expected outcome of Resident #4 remaining in a safe environment. The resident sustained a fall in September 2024. The residence subsequently failed to implement and document fall interventions in the care plan. The resident fell on 12/7/24, which resulted in a broken arm and broken ribs. The residence again did not add individualized fall interventions to the care plan. The resident subsequently fell two more times on 12/11/24 and 12/13/24. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence's fall policy, dated 5/20/22, read in part: "Should a resident experience a fall, staff will provide or arrange for necessary emergency care, and will follow up with necessary (care) plan updates."2. Record ReviewResident #4 was admitted to the residence on 8/7/24, with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, seizures, and mild cognitive impairment. A care plan, dated 8/7/24, read Resident #4 required fall risk safety checks; the expected outcome was Resident #4 remaining in a safe environment. There were no documented fall interventions or individualized approaches for fall prevention in Resident #4's care plan. An incident report, dated 12/7/24 at 5:00 a.m., read Resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall in his bedroom, possibly slipping while exiting the bathroom. Resident #4 was transported to the emergency department for a potential left arm fracture. Contributing factors were identified as wet floor, dementia, lacking safety awareness and needing to use the bathroom. Follow-up and prevention were identified as leaving bathroom door ajar to provide lighting, providing a night light in the room for improved visibility, and offering toileting more frequently. An incident report, dated 12/11/24 at 9:35 p.m., read Resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall in his bedroom and informed staff he was trying to get up. Resident #4 reported having no injuries and was assisted back to bed without further complications. Contributing factors were identified as increased weakness, declining alertness, dementia, impaired mobility, lacking safety awareness, self transferring without assistance. Follow-up and prevention included environmental checks and ruling out environmental factors, positioning the bed in its lowest position, utilizing a motion sensor and continuing frequent rounds. An incident report, dated 12/13/24 at 8:30 a.m., read Resident #4 had an unwitnessed fall in his bedroom, provided staff no information, and only asked to be assisted off the floor. Resident #4 reported having no injuries and was assisted without further complications. Contributing factors were identified as dementia, impaired mobility, impulsivity, lacking safety awareness and transferring without assistance. Follow-up and prevention included environmental checks and ruling out environmental factors, using assistive devices, and implementing fall reduction interventions. 3. InterviewsOn 12/18/24 at 8:30 a.m., Staff #5 said they believed Resident #4 had fallen twice in the past three months but the residence added no individualized services or interventions in Resident #4's care plan to prevent future falls. On 12/18/24 at 8:40 a.m., Staff #8 said they knew of one fall for Resident #4 and closely monitored him. Staff #8 said they knew Resident #4 had fallen from being told verbally by other staff members. On 12/19/24 at 8:24 a.m., Staff #9 said they started working at the residence two weeks prior to the onsite investigation and were not aware of any fall interventions for Resident #4. On 12/19/24 at 11:10 a.m., the clinical services director (CSD) said she was responsible for updating resident care plans. The CSD said she should have added information about resident falls and personalized interventions to prevent falls in the care plan so that staff had access to current fall interventions. On 12/24/24 at 11:39 a.m., Resident #4's responsible party said Resident #4 had fallen at the residence in September 2024 which resulted in a knee injury staff were aware of. 4. Similar deficient practice was found for Residents #2 and #3.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
NOTE: IDR has been submitted to dispute this deficiency. Actions ED will re-educate the Clinical Services Director and Asst. Clinical Services Director on Anthem Falls Reduction Plan and Fall Reduction Protocol by February 14, 2025. CSD or ACSD will continue to revise all care plans that are found to be missing individualized approaches necessary to address fall risks related to deficits in strength and balanceED and CSD or ACSD will continue to review Care Plans weekly for each resident who has sustained a fallED will continue to periodically review resident files to ensure that Fall Reduction Plan is followed for every fall, including but not limited to ensuring care plans are updated with individualized approaches necessary. How and what will be reviewedCare plans for each resident who hassustained fall in the last 3 months. Sample included in monitoringMonitoring will cover all residents with fallsHow often monitoring will occurMonitoring will take place after every documented fall. How the monitoring will be documentedED will monitor compliance with Fall Reduction Program using checklist for every step to be completed with every fall. How long will monitoring continueMonitoring is a permanent part of CSD/ED weekly meetings. How will monitoring be part of QAPI processMonitoring will continue to be documented in the monthly QAPI (CQI) notes. ADDENDUM:Has the care plan for Resident #2-4 been updated to address the individualized approach necessary to address falls risks? Yes, the care plans were updated as necessary in our electronic health record system. What is the agency's plan to train staff on updated care plans? Updated care plans and coordinating services are updated automatically through our electronic healthcare systems: ElderMark and Point of Care. Care Staff access specific service tasks at each shift through Point of Care on their electronic devices.
1192Res Care Srvs-Lift As Tr StffS/S E▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to evaluate whether a resident could be assisted in a safe manner and provided lift assistance to a resident who was experiencing pain, had a change in their physical baseline status, and requested that staff call 911, affecting 49 current residents living in the secure environment. Specifically, on 11/29/24, Staff found Resident #2 lying on the floor of her room asking for help getting up, requesting to be transported to the emergency department, and had an abrasion on her right forearm. The resident verbalized pain when staff attempted to move her. Staff #2 notified the power of attorney (POA), who instructed Staff #2 to await his arrival prior to taking further action. Three staff then assisted with lifting the resident from the floor to her recliner, during which the resident continued to verbalize pain. Ultimately, the residence called 911 the following day (11/30/24) related to Resident #2's uncontrolled pain. Emergency responders transported the resident to the emergency department where she was diagnosed with a fractured femur. The residence failed to call emergency services on 11/29/24 to assess the resident for injury and continued lifting the resident. This failure created an immediate jeopardy risk regarding appropriate lift assistance when a resident's physical status had declined from baseline for 49 current residents living in a secure environment. On 12/19/24, the department directed the residence to provide written evidence that the risk had been removed. Findings include:1. Residence PoliciesThe residence's fall policy, dated 5/20/22, read in pertinent part: "Should a resident experience a faII, staff will provide or arrange for necessary emergency care, and will follow up with necessary service plan updates. Should the resident have trauma resulting in deformity, exhibit any change in level of consciousness, receive obvious head or significant trauma the clinical services director or designee, or (staff) summon emergency medical services (call 911). (Staff) do not move the resident, except to protect against further injury, as in the case of a dangerous environment."The Residence's Medical Emergencies policy, dated 5/20/22, read in pertinent part: "(Staff) immediately summon the (residence) clinical services and/or (administrator) and/or their immediate supervisor should a resident exhibit signs and symptoms of a medical emergency. The clinical services director or designee determines the severity of the situation. The (residence) summons emergency medical services by calling 911, when the resident exhibits signs and systems of distress and/or emergency condition. Examples include, but are not limited to: Fall with deformity, severe pain or head injury. The (residence) staff are not required to obtain permission from the family/responsible party before summoning emergency medical services."2. Record ReviewResident #2 was admitted to the secure environment on 9/9/24 with diagnoses of dementia and osteoporosis. A progress note, dated 11/29/24, read that Resident #2 was screaming for help and lying on the floor on the right side of her body; she screamed in pain when moved. Resident #2's POA was notified and refused to send the resident out to the emergency department (ED) and instructed staff to await his arrival. Resident #2's POA arrived and checked the resident for injury, saw an abrasion on right forearm and asked Resident #2 if she was in pain, and Resident #2 responded yes. Resident #2's POA declined having the resident transported to the ED and instructed Staff #1 to administer pain medication as needed. If she continued to experience pain the following morning the POA would transport her to the ED. The progress note read Resident #2's POA "refused to send her or saying it is too much of a hassle, and that all they will do for her is get an X-ray and tell her she bruised herself."The 11/29/24 at 5:41 p.m., an electronic message from Staff #1 to the clinical services director (CSD) read in part: Resident #2 was found on the floor, it was unknown if the resident had hit head. Resident #2 was bleeding from her forearm and wanted to go to the ED. The POA was on his way to the residence and refused emergency medical services. A progress note, dated 11/30/24, read Resident #2 was transported to the ED at 10:18 a.m., after POA agreed to send her out when staff reported that Resident #2 was in extreme pain whenever staff attempted to provide incontinence care. A progress note, dated 12/4/24, read Resident #2 returned to the residence with a diagnosis of a broken pelvis sustained from the fall at the residence on 11/29/24. 3. InterviewsOn 12/19/24 at 11:00 a.m., the CSD stated Staff #1 notified her that staff found Resident #2 on the floor; the resident was bleeding from her forearm. She stated that Resident #2 refused staff assistance and requested to be transported to the emergency department (ED), but Resident #2's family member instructed staff not to allow transport to the ED. The CSD stated that because the residence was a secure environment, staff often took direction regarding whether a resident required transport to the ED from the residents' responsible parties. On 12/19/24 at 11:10 a.m., Staff #1 said Resident #2 was unable to independently get off the floor. Staff #1 said Staff #2 and #3 provided physical assistance while lifting Resident #2 from the floor to her recliner. Staff #1 said Resident #2 was saying "ouch ouch ouch" throughout the process. Staff #1 said providing lift assistance to residents depended on how much pain they were in but she was instructed by Resident #2's POA not to call emergency service. Staff #1 said every resident was diagnosed with dementia and staff frequently followed the direction of the residents' responsible parties. Staff #1 stated that she administered pain medication at the family member's request. On 12/19/24 at 11:30 a.m., the administrator said any resident verbalizing pain or unable to participate in being assisted off the floor should not be lifted by staff. The ED said 9-1-1 should have been called for further evaluation and determination if Resident #2 needed hospitalization. The ED said if 9-1-1 had determined Resident #2 needed to be seen at the hospital and POA declined services, 9-1-1 had a process for a POA or responsible signing a refusal of services with 9-1-1 directly. On 12/19/24 at 1:00 p.m., Staff #2 said on 11/29/24 she notified Staff #1 that Resident #2 was on the floor. Staff #1 said she was trained to inform a qualified medication administration personnel (QMAP) or nurse anytime a resident was found on the floor. Staff #2 said it was the responsibility of the QMAP or nurse to evaluate if a resident hit their head or was having pain. Staff #2 said staff lifted residents off the floor depending on how much pain they were experiencing. Staff #2 said when there was a lot of pain she followed instructions from the QMAP or a nurse. On 12/19/24 at 1:15 p.m., Staff #4 said QMAPs were responsible for evaluating residents observed on the floor. Staff #4 said she was trained that calling 911 depended on the severity of the resident's pain. Staff #4 said if a resident requested to go to the hospital after being observed on the floor it was up to the POA, if the POA said not to send them to the hospital the resident would be assisted to bed and provided an as needed pain medication if one was prescribed. On 12/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., Staff #3 said he assisted in the process of lifting Resident #2 into her recliner from the floor. He said Resident #2 verbalized pain and was unable to physically participate transferring from the floor to her recliner. Staff #3 said Resident #2 was grinding her teeth and saying "my back, my back" while transferring. 4. Immediate Jeopardy Risk - Written Evidence, Immediate CorrectionThe investigation established that the findings above placed all 49 residents in the secure environment at immediate jeopardy risk for not getting medical assistance timely and/or sustaining injury or additional injuries when staff lifted a resident who experienced pain and had a decline in physical status and did not call 911 at the residents request. The residence was directed to provide the department with written evidence that the risk had been removed. Part 3.13 of Chapter VII regulations requires residences to immediately correct the circumstances that gave rise to the immediate jeopardy situation. On 12/19/24 at 4:32 p.m., the administrator submitted written evidence that read in part: The clinical services director, the administrator, or designee would provide training to the staff on 12/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., and daily thereafter, until all staff had received training. All staff will receive the policy on medical emergencies, and the administrator or designee will verbally communicate the policy with staff at each shift change. The medical emergencies policy will be posted in medication rooms and staff who have not completed training by 1/22/25 will be removed from the schedule. Staff will call the clinical service director or administrator for all medical emergencies, and they will specifically ask staff about resident pain. This process will be applied to all incidents indefinitely. The medical emergencies policy will be reviewed by the vice president of clinical services.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
NOTE: IDR has been submitted to dispute this deficiency. ActionsTraining took place at All Staff Meeting on 12/19/24 @ 2 pm. For employees not in attendance at all staff meetings, further training will occur daily. The training will be presented by the Clinical Service Director, the Executive Director, or designee, until which time all staff have received training. All training conducted will provide opportunities for questions and clarifications as needed. Completion Date: January 2,2025. Effective 12/19/24: All staff will receive the Anthem Medical Emergencies Policy for their review and questions. In addition, the ED or designee will verbally communicate with all staff at each change of shift to ensure that staff are aware of the process to be followed in the event of a fall. Effective 12/19/24: The Medical Emergencies Policy will be posted in Medication Rooms in clear site for further staff review. Any staff who do not complete training upon first shift worked or by 1/2/25 will be removed from the schedule. Staff will be informed that failure to follow policy and procedure will result in discipline action up to and including termination. All new staff will be trained in the Medical Emergencies Policy and Protocol at time of hire. All training will be documented, and a sign-in sheet will be maintained in separate community file for this training. This file will be maintained in the Executive Director’s office and reviewed monthly for compliance. Per policy, Clinical Service Director is to be called for all medical emergencies. In the event the Clinical Services Director is not available, Executive Director will be notified. During this notification, either CSD or ED will specifically ask staff about resident pain. This process to be carried out for all incidents, indefinitely. Medical Emergencies Policy to be reviewed by VP of Clinical Services to remove word “Severe” from definition of pain. How and what will be reviewedSignature sheets for all Medical Emergencies Training will be compared to current staff roster. Sample included in monitoringAll staff will be included in the training processHow often monitoring will occurMonitoring of training will take place after every training session. How the monitoring will be documentedED will monitor compliance using the checklist for every step to be completed with every fall. How long will monitoring continueMonitoring will become a permanent part of CSD/ED weekly meetings. How will monitoring be part of QAPI processMonitoring will be documented in the monthly QAPI (CQI) notes. EMERGENCIES ANDMEDICAL NEEDSAnthem Memory Care Updated May 20, 2022POLICY: Medical EmergenciesThe resident will receive emergency medical care when needed to preventfurther injury or illness. Procedure
1. Caregivers immediately summon the community Clinical Services and/orExecutive Director and/or their immediate supervisor should a residentexhibit signs and symptoms of a medical emergency. 2. The Clinical Services Director or designee, determines the severity of thesituation. 3. The community summons emergency medical services by calling 911),when the resident exhibits signs and systems of distress and/oremergency condition. Examples include, but are not limited to:a. New onset of chest pain;b. Recurrent chest pain, unrelieved in 15 minutes by previouslyordered nitroglycerin given as ordered;c. Unconsciousness;d. Fall with deformity, severe pain or head injury;e. Uncontrolled bleeding;f. First time seizure;g. Recurring seizure which last for more than 1 minute;h. Sudden onset severe pain;i. Shortness of breath;j. Sudden lack of muscle control, ability to communicate, droopingfacial expression or other signs of stroke;k. Low blood sugar (according to physician order parameters, usuallyl. Excessively high blood sugar, according to physician orderparameters;m. Poisoning;n. Fever which is not lowering despite interventions and feverreducing agents;o. Choking;p. Psychiatric crisis. 4. A non-emergency transport is only used when the resident needs urgentbut non-emergency medical care, such as stitches, controlled bleeding,etc. 5. The Executive Director or designee, contacts the family/responsible party,as quickly as possible, once the resident is safely under the care of theparamedics. Unless instructed otherwise by the family/responsible party,this includes anytime, 24-hours a day. 6. The Community staff are not required to obtain permission from thefamily/responsible party before summoning emergency medical services. 7. A staff member remains with the resident until paramedics transport out ofthe community. 8. A copy of the current medication list, Face Sheet, and any POLST/DNRdocuments are given to the paramedics, along with the EmergencyIdentification Form. 9. The actual medications are retained in the community. 10. The staff person observing the transport out of the community will notewhat belongings are going with the resident, such as jewelry, dentures,prosthetic devices, etc. 11. A narrative chart entry is made in the resident’s chart regarding thecircumstances which led up to the call (Data), what care was provided bythe staff, including any first aid (Action), as well as the resident’s responseto the action (Response). 12. An Incident Report is completed. POLICY: FallsShould a resident experience a fall, staff will provide or arrange for necessaryemergency care, and will follow up with necessary service plan updates. Procedure
1. Should the resident have trauma resulting in deformity, exhibit any changein level of consciousness, received obvious head or significant trauma theClinical Services Director or designee, or caregivers summon emergencymedical services (call 911). 2. When a resident falls, caregivers are instructed to summon immediateassistance from the Clinical Services Director or their immediatesupervisor. 3. Caregivers do not move the resident, except to protect against furtherinjury, as in the case of a dangerous environment. 4. The physician is contacted for further instructions if the head was notinvolved in the fall and the resident is able to move all extremities.a. The Clinical Services Director instructs caregivers to provideappropriate care and frequent resident checks. Any change instatus is reported to the Clinical Services Director. 5. An incident report is completed. 6. The Clinical Services Director informs the physician of subsequent fallsand instability. Medical intervention, physical therapy, and/or gait analysisis arranged when Resident/Responsible Person remain a significant riskfor falls. 7. Ongoing falls may require relocation from the community. Fall Reduction PlanFalls are a major threat to the health and independence of older adults aged 65 and older. Each year in the United Sates, nearly one-third of older adults experience a fall. About one in ten falls among older adults results in a serious injury, such as a hip fracture or head injury that requires hospitalization. Inaddition to the physical and emotional pain, many people need to spend at least a year recovering in a long-term care facility. Purpose:To identify fall risk factors for each resident and to eliminate or minimize risk factors and falls. Policy:The community may utilize a multifaceted approach to a Fall Reduction program which may include:• Education of staff and residents about fall risk and fall reduction techniques• Evaluate each new resident’s fall risk factors upon move in• Evaluate each residents fall risk factors quarterly, with a fall event, and with a significant change in condition.• Tailored interventions to reduce as many identified fall risk factors as possible• Physical activity program that provides physical activity/exercise to improve leg strength and balance for all residents based upon each resident’s current health status and interest in participation.• Multi-disciplinary fall risk reduction approach that includes exercise, physical therapy, medication management, pain management, correction/improvement of impaired vision, and environmental modifications. Procedure:• At time of initial evaluation, discuss and review the fall reduction information packet anddisclosure form.• Complete a fall risk evaluation upon move in, following a fall event, annually and with a significant change of condition.o For any resident with a fall history or at high risk for falls, request a physical therapy evaluation for fall risk, gait testing and transfer safety.o Discuss with physician any health, vision, pain, behavioral or medication related fall risk issues that could be reduced or eliminated.o Update Service/Care plan to include resident-centric interventionso Identify those residents whose room is cluttered, discuss risks with resident/POA and document removal of clutter as agreed to by resident/POA.• Track and trend all falls individually and in aggregate (Using Eldermark Dashboard features)o Analyze falls for patternso Implement alternate interventions as applicable.• Implement routine/daily environmental-focused community walk-throughs to identify factorsthat could contribute to falls such as raised area of carpeting, uneven flooring, slippery surfaces, missing or loose handrails/grab bars. Anthem Memory Care Communities policy indicates that no employee, acting alone, will assist a fallen resident off the floor. ProcedureIf a resident has fallen, the following steps should be taken:1. Evaluate the resident to determine if severe pain exists and if he/she can move. The resident should not be moved if he/she has severe pain. Instead, emergency services should be summoned. 2. Determine if the resident is weight bearing and can assist staff members in getting up from the floor. 3. If the resident feels he/she can bear weight, two employees can provide standby assistance to help the resident get up from the floor. If possible, staff members should provide reassurance and calmly talk to residents throughout the process. 4. If the resident cannot assist and is unable to bear weight, make the resident as comfortable as possible and call emergency services. Offer pillows for support, blankets for comfort. 5. Stay with the resident at all times until emergency services arrive. 6. An Incident Report shall be fully completed in Eldermark. 7. Repeated falls by a resident will have follow-up to include a Fall Risk Analysis and progressive measures to help avoid future falls. 8. If resident falls and strikes their head, there is a risk for a closed-head injury and, therefore, need to be sent to ER or seen my MD for evaluation of the injury. If the resident/POA does not agree to sending the resident out for treatment per medical/nursing advice, the responsible party will read and sign a disclosure statement indicating their refusal to adhere to medical/nursing advice.
1412Res Rts-Inv Ab/Neg Alleg or Inj Unk Org IUOS/S B▼
Findings
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin, affecting three of five sample residents (#1, #3 and #5). Findings include:1. Record ReviewResident #1 was admitted to the residence on 5/31/24, with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and restlessness and agitation. A progress note, dated 10/15/24 at 12:30 p.m., read Resident #1 had an abrasion above her left eyebrow and Resident #1 spent a lot of time in the common outdoor courtyard in the trees and bushes digging around. A progress note, dated 10/15/24 at 12:58 p.m., read Skin Condition Change: Resident #1 had a skin tear on her left upper forehead. A progress note, dated 10/17/24 at 10:24 a.m., written by the clinical services director (CSD), read Resident #1 had an observed (left) forehead abrasion and neosporin was applied. An incident report, dated 10/17/24 at 2:00 p.m., read Resident #1's family member alerted staff that the resident was found to have bruises to the left forehead, chin, hands, right abdomen and left knee. A progress note, dated 10/18/24 at 6:07 p.m., read a staff member and an external services provider noticed a scab to the resident's left forehead prior to a shower on 10/15/25 without other bruising, known fall or source of injury. The resident record did not include documentation that the residence investigated any of the above documented injuries. 2. InterviewOn 12/19/24 at 11:00 a.m., the CSD stated Resident #1 was physically active and outside, often digging in raised planters. The CSD said an investigation should have been conducted prior to 10/17/24 to better determine the source of the forehead abrasion. 3. Similar deficient practice was found for Resident #3 and #5.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
NOTE: IDR has been submitted to dispute this deficiency. Actions CSD or designee will re-train all staff on how and when to report bruises and/or any injury of unknown origin by February 14, 2025. CSD or designee will continue to investigate all reports of bruises or injuries of unknown origin within 48 hours of the initial report. Results of the investigation will be documented in the resident chart and communicated to Primary Care Physician and resident representative. ED and CSD or designee will continue to review reported injuries of unknown origin at weekly 1:1 meeting to ensure care plans are updated appropriately. How and what will be reviewedSignature sheets for all Training will be compared to current staff roster. All occurrences of injuries of unknown origin will be reviewed for compliance. Sample included in monitoringAll staff will be included in the training processHow often monitoring will occurMonitoring of training will take place after every training session and after every occurrence. How the monitoring will be documentedED will monitor compliance using the checklist for every step to be completed with every reported injury of unknown origin. How long will monitoring continueMonitoring will become a permanent part of CSD/ED weekly meetings. How will monitoring be part of QAPI processMonitoring will be documented in the monthly QAPI (CQI) notes. ADDENDUM:How will new staff be trained on MANE Requirements?Prior to training on the floor, all staff complete video training including a section titled "Understanding Abuse & Neglect."
3060Sec Env-Enhncd Rsdnt CP IncldS/S B▼
Findings
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure the resident care plan met each requirement for each resident in a secure environment, affecting 49 residents residing in a secure unit. Findings include:1. ObservationOn 12/19/24 at 9:00 a.m., the door to Resident #6's room was locked and he was unable to enter. Resident #7 offered Resident #6 to go through his room because the men had a shared bathroom. Resident #7 had a key for his personal room, unlocked the door and Resident #6 was able to gain access to his room. Resident #8 was also unable to open the door to his room because the door was locked. Staff #9 was walking down hallway when Resident #8 asked her to unlock his room door and she did so with a key she had. On 12/19/24 at 8:21 a.m., Staff #5 entered an unknown resident's room and unlocked the bathroom cabinet displaying personal care and hygiene items inside. 2. Record review:Resident #1 was admitted to the residence on 5/31/24, diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, restlessness and agitation. Progress notes from 10/3/24 to 12/11/24 read Resident #1 was agitated, yelling, pacing, dragging their laundry basket of clothes towards exit, attempting to or successfully climbing over kitchen counter, and physically aggressive towards staff on 34 documented occasions. 3. Interviews:On 12/18/24 at approximately 2:30 p.m., Staff #3 said Resident #1 frequently dragged her laundry basket full of clothes down the hallways or tried to climb over the kitchen cabinet. Staff #3 said they observed these actions directly or heard about events from other staff. Staff #3 said the resident was not easily redirected and had a strong personality; staff monitored her activity for safety and informed the qualified medication administrator personnel when a concern arose. On 12/19/24 at 8:21 a.m., Staff #5 said the clinical service director (CSD) assessed residents for their ability to have a room key; residents without keys had to ask for staff assistance when they locked themselves out of their rooms. Staff #5 said bathroom cabinets were locked in all resident rooms regardless of their ability to perform self care and residents had to ask staff to unlock them to access their personal hygiene products. On 12/19/24 at approximately 9:00 a.m., Staff #4 said when residents were observed yelling, agitated, excessively pacing or displaying other behaviors, it was documented in a progress note, written on the 24 hour shift report or verbally communicated between staff. On 12/19/24 at 9:10 a.m., Staff #9 said she was unaware if Resident #6 or #8 had keys to their rooms. Staff #9 said when residents locked themselves out of their rooms they had to find staff to unlock their doors. On 12/19/24 at 11:00 a.m., the CSD said she was aware of the requirement for enhanced care plans but was not aware the residence did not include all required elements in their enhanced care plans. On 12/19/24 at 4:00 p.m., the administrator acknowledged the following components needed to be included in enhanced care plans: known behavioral expressions for residents along with individualized approaches, how residents had independent access to their rooms and were protected from unwanted visitors, documentation of what personal grooming items and hygiene products were safe for individual residents to have in their possession, and storage of items to prevent other residents from accessing them.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
NOTE: IDR has been submitted to dispute this deficiency. ActionsWandering:Each resident's care plan will continue to include a comprehensive description of their wandering patterns and known behavioral expressions. These care plans will be completed by CSD at admission and with change in condition. Care staff will notify CSD and ACSD of these changes using wisdom to act notices. Staff will be re-trained and guided on implementing these approaches to effectively manage and address the resident's specific behaviors. Continuous Independent Access to Individual Rooms:Each resident's care plan will continue to outline how each resident will have continuous independent access to their individual room within the secure environment. The plan will include measures to protect residents from unwanted visitation by other residents. Staff will be re-trained on these measures to ensure that residents' privacy and security are maintained. Staff Oversight, Monitoring, and Accompaniment:Each resident's care plan will continue to identify the type and level of staff oversight, monitoring, and accompaniment needed to meet the needs of the resident within the secure environment and secure outdoor area. The plan will outline specific strategies and protocols for staff to provide appropriate support and supervision to the resident. Personal Grooming and Hygiene Items:Each resident's care plan will continue to identify the personal grooming and hygiene items that are determined to be safe for the resident to have in their own possession for self-care. The plan will include details on how these items are stored to prevent unauthorized access by other residents, ensuring the residents’ safety and maintaining their dignity. Staff Education and Training:Staff members involved in the care of residents within the secure environment will continue to receive comprehensive education and training on the enhanced care plan requirements upon hire and ongoing as needed. Training will cover topics such as understanding wandering behaviors, implementing individualized approaches, protecting privacy, providing appropriate staff oversight and monitoring, and maintaining secure storage of personal grooming and hygiene items. Enhanced Resident Care plan will continue to be completed and reviewed by CSD upon admission, with change in condition, and/or annually. How and what will be reviewed3 care plans will be sampled and audited monthly and ongoing during QAPI meetingsSample included in monitoringAll staff will be included in the training processHow often monitoring will occurMonitoring will take place after every training session. How the monitoring will be documentedMonitoring will be documented in the monthly QAPI notes. How long will monitoring continueMonitoring will be ongoing from this date forward. How will monitoring be part of QAPI process3 care plans will be audited by QAPI committee to ensure they include wandering patterns, known behavior expressions, room access, staff oversight needed for safety, and what grooming items are safe to keep in residents' possession. ADDENDUM:Have the care plans been updated to include the following:(A) A description of the resident's wandering patterns and known behavioral expressions, along with individualized approaches to be implemented by staff to protect the resident and other residents with whom they have contact;(B) A description of how the resident will have continuous independent access to his or her individual room, along with the ALR's plan to protect the resident from unwanted visitation by other residents;(C) Identification of the type and level of staff oversight, monitoring, and/or accompaniment that the ALR deems necessary to meet the needs of the resident within the secure environment and secure outdoor area; and(D) Documentation describing the personal grooming and hygiene items that are determined safe for the resident to have in their own possession for self-care, and how those items are stored to prevent unauthorized access by other residents. Yes, if these issues apply to a resident, it is part of their care plan. How are staff being trained on the current and updated care plans?Updated care plans and coordinating services are updated automatically through our electronic healthcare systems: ElderMark and Point of Care. Care Staff access specific service tasks at each shift through Point of Care on their electronic devices. What is the plan to ensure individuals have continuous independent access to their bedrooms?Residents that are able to use keys for their bedrooms are given keys. If keys are lost, they are replaced. For those residents who cannot manage keys, their rooms are left open for them.
12/18/2023Revisit: Licensure and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID JWGQ12No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note2 building records▼
Findings · record 1 of 2
A revisit survey was completed on 12/18/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/28/23. No deficiencies were cited.
Findings · record 2 of 2
Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note▼
Findings
Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
12/18/2023Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID ZXR313No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A revisit survey was completed on 12/18/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/28/23. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note▼
Findings
Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/28/2023Licensure and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID JWGQ1110 deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A relicensure survey with complaint #CO33334 was completed on 9/28/23. Deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0172LicProc-IntlApp CAPSS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure a Colorado Adult Protective Services Data Systems (CAPS) check was performed prior to hiring one of three sample staff (#33) who provided direct care to at-risk residents, for one of three sample staff (#8), affecting 41 current residents. Findings include:1. References a. According to Colorado Revised Statutes (2017) Title 26 Human Services Code, " ... individuals receiving care and services from persons employed in programs or facilities ... are vulnerable to mistreatment, including abuse, neglect, and exploitation. It is the intent of the general assembly to minimize the potential for employment of persons with a history of mistreatment of at-risk adults in positions that would allow those persons unsupervised access to these adults. As a result, the general assembly finds it necessary to strengthen protections for vulnerable adults by requiring certain employers to request a CAPS check by the state department to determine if a person who will provide direct care to an at-risk adult has been substantiated in a case of mistreatment of an at-risk adult.b. C.R.S. 26-3.1-101 (1.8) reads a "CAPS check" means a check of the Colorado adult protective services data system pursuant to section 26-3.1-111.c. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 2.7, defines an "At-risk person" as any person who is 70 years of age or older, or any person who is 18 years of age or older and meets one or more of the following criteria: (D) Is a person with an intellectual and developmental disability as defined in Section 25.5-10-202, C.R.S.; (E) Is a person with a mental health disorder as defined in Section 27-65-102(11.5), C.R.S..2. Record Review On 9/28/23, face sheets for Residents #14-#21 were provided and read all residents were over the age of 70, which indicated they were defined as at-risk persons. Review of the personnel file for Staff #8 revealed a hire date of 7/26/23; however, the file contained no evidence a CAPS check had been completed. The residence's August and September 2023 schedule revealed the following:Staff #8 worked on 8/6-8/7/23, 8/13-8/14/23, 8/20-8/21/23, 8/27-8/28/23, 9/4/23, 9/10-9/11/23, 9/17-9/18/23 and 9/24-9/25/23. On 9/28/23 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the completed CAPS check for Staff #8 was requested from the staff development director; however, he was unable to provide the documentation. 3. InterviewsOn 9/28/23 at 1:18 p.m., the administrator stated she was aware CAPS checks were required to be completed prior to hire. However, she confirmed the personnel file for Staff #8 had not contained a CAPS check as required.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0610Prsnnl-Crmnl HX Rcrd ChcksS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure a name-based criminal history record check that was conducted by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was completed for each prospective employee prior to staff hire, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Staff #8 revealed a hire date of 7/26/23; however, the file contained no evidence a name-based criminal background check had been completed. Review of the personnel file for Staff #9 revealed a hire date of 8/29/23 and contained a name-based criminal background check that included a report conducted by the CBI, dated 9/28/23. The background check was performed after the initial staff member's date of hire. Review of the personnel file for Contracted Staff #10 revealed a hire date of 9/24/23 and contained a name-based criminal background check that included a report conducted by the CBI, dated 9/28/23. The background check was performed after the initial staff member's date of hire. The residence's August and September 2023 schedule revealed the following:Staff #8 worked on 8/6-8/7, 8/13-8/14, 8/20-8/21, 8/27-8/28, 9/4, 9/10-9/11, 9/17-9/18 and 9/24-9/25/23. Staff #9 worked on 9/6-9/7, 9/10-9/14, 9/17-9/21 and 9/24-9/25/23. Contracted Staff #10 worked on 9/24 and 9/25/23. On 9/28/23 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated she was aware the name-based criminal background checks were expected to be completed prior to hire. Additionally, she could not confirm if the backgrounds checks had been completed prior to hire; therefore, they were completed on the day of the onsite visit (9/28/23) for Staff #9 and Contracted Staff #10.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Executive Director and/or Staff Development Director will audit each employee file for background checks for all personnel members and ensure that the results are properly documented in their personnel files over the next 30 days. In cases where background checks were not previously conducted, we will perform the required checks. Staff Development Director will be retrained on the steps required prior to hiring all employees. For the next 3 months prospective employee files will be audited for completion of all required background checks prior to hire. Completed audits will be documented on the audit tracker and reviewed by the ED at the weekly SDD and ED meetings. Ongoing a minimum of 2 employee files will be audited each month and results reviewed at the QAPI meeting each month.
0664Prsnnl-Prsnnl Files RqS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure each personnel file included orientation and training and results of background checks, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents. Findings include:The residence's personnel files for Staff #8 and Contracted Staff #10 revealed no documentation of training as required. On 9/28/23 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the staff development director was requested to provide the completed training for Contracted Staff #10; however, he was unable to provide the documentation. On 9/28/23 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the staff development director confirmed the residence did not have the training for Staff #8 and Contracted Staff #10, as required. On 9/28/23 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated she was aware of the required items that each personnel file should have contained.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0910Em Pr-P/P Res InfoS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure there was a readily available roster of current residents along with a diagram showing room locations, affecting 41 current residents. This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include:On 9/28/23 at 8:07 a.m., a resident roster was requested. On 9/28/23 at 8:28 a.m., the administrator provided a list of residents, their room numbers and emergency contact information. However, there was no diagram that showed room locations. On 9/28/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware that a residence diagram showing room numbers was required to be included with a resident roster. She added, she was not aware of the requirement, therefore, the previous deficient practice was not corrected.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Our staff has created a comprehensive roster of current residents, including their names and room locations. A diagram showing room locations will also be developed and updated at least monthly. Placement of Roster and Diagram: The roster of current residents and room location diagram will be placed in a readily accessible behind the front desk. This has been completed. All facility staff will be trained on the locations of the resident roster and room location diagram. Monthly audits will be completed by ED to ensure presence and accuracy of the resident roster and room location diagram
1060Res Ad/D/C-D/C RqS/S C▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to arrange discharge to a resident who posed a danger to self and the assisted living residence was unable to sufficiently address those issues through therapeutic approach and needed more services than could be routinely provided by the assisted living residence or an external service provider, affecting one former resident (#23). Specifically, Former Resident #23 from approximately 7/4-8/15/23 had 10 falls and seven of those falls resulted in pain or injuries. Despite the residence's therapeutic approaches and routine services provided, Former Resident #23 continued to fall. The administrator said she would not consider discharging a resident if the residence was faced with a similar situation. Although the residence documented and implemented numerous therapeutic approaches and interventions, the resident continued to fall, which posed a danger to self. The administrator stated, "We were trying everything."Findings include:1. References and Residence Policiesa. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, defines "Discharge" as termination of the resident agreement and the resident's permanent departure from the facility.b. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 11.11, requires that the assisted living residence shall arrange to discharge any resident who exhibits conduct that poses a danger to self or others and the assisted living residence is unable to sufficiently address those issues through therapeutic approach and needs more services that can be routinely provided by the assisted living residence or an external service provider.c. The residence's Move-Out policy, dated May 2017, read in part, "Residents may move out of the community for a variety of reasons, such as increased need for healthcare services, a change in condition."d. The residence's undated resident agreement, read, in part, "Termination by community. (Residence) may terminate this agreement at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice to the resident representative if any of the following events occur: Failure by the resident or resident representative to comply with state assessment requirements including but not limited to having a physician's report completed prior to admission, at least annually and whence the community notifies resident representative that resident has undergone a significant change in condition. Changed circumstances. If circumstances create imminent danger of death or serious harm to resident or others, the community may terminate this agreement without prior notice. In addition, if community determines that resident is unable to remain at the community because of the level of care required for the resident exceeds community capabilities, resident will be asked to move from the community, and this agreement will terminate."2. Former Resident #23 was admitted to the residence on 8/23/21 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Former Resident #23 passed away on 8/19/23. A practitioner's progress note in Former Resident #30's record, dated 6/29/23 read Former Resident #30 was seen at the residence for a previous unwitnessed fall where he was found on the floor in his room with a skin tear on his right elbow; Former Resident #23 had a history of multiple falls. Progress notes for July and August 2023 for Former Resident #23 revealed the following:On 7/4/23, Former Resident #23 fell in the morning, cut his right eyebrow and received approximately 30 stitches. On 7/21/23, Former Resident #23 fell off his recliner and bumped the left side of his head and had a skin tear on his back. On 7/27/23, Former Resident #23 had increased anxiety and agitation. On 7/31/23 at 6:02 a.m., Former Resident #23 had a fall which required staff to bandage his head. On 7/31/23 at 1:06 p.m., Former Resident #23's head would not stop bleeding since he cut his head from the fall in the morning. He would not stay sitting in his wheelchair. On 7/31/23 at 9:48 p.m., Former Resident #23 was extremely agitated, unstable and was shaking. An external hospice representative administered an as needed anxiety and pain medication for Former Resident #23. On 8/1/23, Former Resident #23 showed signs of agitation and possible terminal restlessness. "(Family member) is aware of CSD (clinical services director) and hospice RN (registered nurse) concerns for resident's safety given his impaired decision making, inability to remain seated or still, recent trauma from fall and signs of possible terminal changes ... Resident remains bruised from fall on 7/31 and has (sic) scabbed laceration at rt (right) eyebrow that he will not leave bandage on."On 8/1/23 at 10:06 p.m., Former Resident #23 fell out of a chair in the common area. Anxiety medication adjusted by an external hospice representative every six hours. On 8/2/23 at 10:02 p.m., Former Resident #23 was restless and agitated. He needed someone to stay by his side. A staff member had to sit with him at dinner. On 8/3/23, Former Resident #23 stood up and fell. On 8/4/23, Former Resident #23 came out of his room and had another laceration on his right eyebrow. On 8/5/23, Former Resident #23 had been restless and had fallen. On 8/5/23 at 8:55 p.m., Former Resident #23 was found on the floor in the hallway of the residence. A therapeutic approach was provided by administering Former Resident #23 a as needed pain medication. The medication provided no relief to Former Resident #23's pain. On 8/5/23 at 9:09 p.m., Former Resident #23 would not sit in his bed or in the living room. On 8/6/23 at 1:37 p.m., Former Resident #23 was very agitated, tried to get out of his chair and would not sit still. He kept trying to stand and walk. His elbow kept bleeding and would not keep his bandages on. On 8/7/23 at 2:04 p.m., Former Resident #23 would not stay seated. He had to be watched all day by staff to make sure he did not walk. He was unsteady and leaned forward. On 8/8/23, Former Resident #23 was unsteady and agitated. Staff sat with him at dinner until he went to bed. On 8/9/23, Former Resident #23 fell during dinner in the common area and was extremely agitated. He had an abrasion on his forehead. The wound was cleaned and steri-strips placed. As needed anxiety and pain medication was administered. On 8/10/23, Former Resident #23 had a witnessed fall outside the community kitchenette. Former Resident #23 stood up, stepped sideways and fell to his right side. Former Resident #23 sustained a skin tear to his elbow. On 8/11/23, Former Resident #23 walked around all day and leaned forward. He tripped over his shoes when he walked. On 8/12/23, Former Resident #23 would not sit still, was unsteady on his feet and leaned forward. On 8/14/23, Former Resident #23 was agitated and tried to get out of bed and required one on one with staff to help him eat dinner. On 8/15/23, Former Resident #23 was not able to eat and was lethargic. A care plan in Former Resident #23's record, dated 8/1/23, read he was a fall risk and required staff to provide a fun diversional activity, take him for a walk, offer fluids or provide one on one activities. Former Resident #23 required two hour checks for safety and, "On 6/13/23: High fall risk; encourage resident to wear protective ball cap daily. Care staff will ensure that bump cap insert is present in his cap and remind (Former Resident #30) to keep it on ... care staff will perform frequent checks due to recent falls." Although the residence documented all falls and attempted to implement interventions to prevent falls, the former resident continued to fall with injury. On 9/28/23 at 3:08 p.m., the CSD said, "High fall risk means they don't need skilled (care at a skilled nursing facility). But doesn't put them outside the scope. Family was happy with placement here. He was ambulatory up until the last two days of his life ... (we were) trying to be conservative in prescribing anxiety meds (medications). He couldn't stay seated. We had meetings with family to discuss how to handle this. Family wasn't necessarily open to sedation. (Family) wanted him to get up to move ... (family member) did not want him medicated ... He had every intervention that we could think of. (We) shifted our focus to prevention of falls to prevention of serious injury. Tried a padded ball cap. (Former Resident #23's) falls were forward and involved face strikes ... We do not have the capability to provide one on one sitters." The CSD said they had not considered discharging Former Resident #23 because he did not require skilled care due to his falls; however, she acknowledged the former resident required more services than could be routinely provided by the residence. The CSD asked the surveyors what else the residence could have done. On 9/28/23 at 3:46 p.m., the administrator said, "We devised a special hat for him (Former Resident #23) to wear to prevent head injuries. Tried fall mats, toileting schedule. Lowered the bed." The administrator stated she believed the residence provided every intervention they could to ensure the former resident remained safe and uninjured. However, she confirmed the interventions did not prevent the resident from continued injuries. She added, "We had multiple care conferences. Family did not want to put a sitter in place. His room was close to the main area. Short of wrapping him in bubble wrap, no. We worked closely with medications so they were not over sedating. We did all that together as a team. We were trying everything."
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
1110Res Care Srvs-Min Srvs Res AgrS/S A▼
Findings
Based on interview and record review the residence failed to, either directly or indirectly, through a resident agreement, provide personal services, affecting one of seven sample residents (#16). Findings include:1. Reference and Residence Policiesa. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, in part two, defines "Personal Services" as those services that an assisted living residence and its staff provide for each resident including, but not limited to, assistance with activities of daily living.b. The residence's Basic Care Services, dated May 2017, read in part, "Personal care will be provided to all residents on an individual basis according to findings from admission appraisals and subsequent re-appraisals ... Incontinent care is given as necessary to residents requiring assistance every two hours." c. The residence's Incontinence policy, dated May 2017, read in part, "Residents suffering with incontinence will receive care and management aimed towards restoring continence whenever possible and preventing incontinence related problems ... The administrator instructs caregivers to track episodes of incontinence ... Unless contraindicated, residents receive incontinent care and brief changes every two hours, or more often as needed, to keep the resident clean and dry."d. The residence's undated resident agreement read, in part, "Resident service plan. With guidance from the physician's report and the community's assessment, and with input from the resident representative, the community will develop a service plan for resident. The service plan will outline what services resident is to receive ... Basic personal assistance with care. As part of basic services, the community will assist resident with the following activities, as needed ... toileting. 2. Resident #16 was admitted to the residence on 6/4/22. A care plan for Resident #16, effective 6/3/22, read, "(Resident #16) requires assistance of 1 caregiver for toileting. 1 care staff will assist (Resident #16) with toileting needs during the day. Offer toileting at least every two hours and as needed ... Every 2 hours during the day ask resident if they need to use the bathroom, guide and cue as needed."On 9/28/23 at 11:15 a.m., Staff #16 said when he arrived on shift Resident #16 was saturated with urine some of the time. On 9/28/23 at 12:13 p.m., a family member of Resident #16 said in the last two months the care staff were unqualified and untrained. He added, in the last two months he had visited Resident #16 and he found her wet with urine. He added she was required to be taken to the bathroom every two to three hours by care staff. The family member said he would find her soiled frequently when he came to visit and that he did not think the residence staff was following the resident's incontinence plan because she was soiled almost every day. On 9/28/23 at approximately 3:00 p.m., the clinical services director (CSD) said Resident #16 required staff to take her to the bathroom every two to three hours. She added staff notified her that Resident #16 resisted assistance with the bathroom at times and was incontinent frequently. On 9/28/23 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator said she expected care staff to provide residents personal care services according to their care plans.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
1224Res Care Srvs-Res Enggmnt PostS/S B▼
Findings
Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to place notices of planned resident engagement offerings in a central location readily accessible to residents, affecting 41 current residents. Findings include:The residence had two separate secure environments; East and West side. On 9/28/23 from approximately 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., there was no posting of planned resident engagement offerings readily accessible to residents in either the east or west side of the residence. On 9/28/23 at 3:40 p.m., Staff #11 said there was no engagement calendar posted in the west side of the residence. On 9/28/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated there were copies of the engagement calendar located adjacent to the receptionist desk in the main lobby area that should have been posted in each of the secure environments. She acknowledged there was not a readily accessible calendar placed in a central location for residents in the east or west wing, as required.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
The Executive Director will retrain the Life Engagement Director on the required notices for planned resident engagement offerings and notifications of any changes. This training will occur within 30 days and documented on a training sign off sheet. Notices of planned resident engagement offerings will be created to inform residents, relatives, and the public about upcoming activities and events. These notices will include the date, time, location, and description of each offering. Notices will be posted in each neighborhood (West and East), which will be readily accessible to residents, relatives, and the public. The notices will be clearly visible and easily readable. Copies of all notices will be retained and accessible in the ED office for at least six months. LED and ED will review these postings weekly for 3 months to ensure compliance. The review will be documented in the weekly ED/LED meetings.
1350Res Rghts-Intrnl Griev/Compl Res PrS/S B▼
Findings
Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to place in a visible on-site location the residence's internal process for raising and addressing grievances and complaints, along with full contact information for required agencies, affecting 41 current residents. Findings include:The residence consisted of a main lobby area with two separate secured environments; East and West. On 9/28/23 from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., there was no process for addressing grievances and complaints placed in a visual onsite location along with full contact information for the following agencies:The Adult Protection Services for the appropriate countyThe area's agency on agingThe Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment The Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and FinancingOn 9/28/23 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator acknowledged there was not a visible on-site location for the residence's internal process for raising and addressing grievances and complaints, along with full contact information for required agencies. She further stated she was unaware of the posting requirement.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
1468Med/Med Adm-Ordrs Cmpy w/OrdrsS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration, affecting three of six sample residents (#14, #17, #20). Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence's Basic Care Services policy, dated May 2017, read in part, "Medications are to be given according to physician orders."2. Resident #17 was admitted to the residence on 7/31/23. A written practitioner's order, dated 8/1/23, directed the residence to administer acetaminophen 500 mg three times daily. However, the September 2023 MAR for Resident #17 read the medication was pending pharmacy delivery and not administered in the morning on 9/1, 9/2, 9/3, 9/5, 9/6, 9/8, 9/9, 9/10, 9/11, 9/12 and 9/13/23, in the afternoon on 9/1, 9/2, 9/3, 9/5, 9/6, 9/8, 9/9, 9/10, 9/11, 9/12 and 9/13/23, on 9/4 and 9/7/23, for a total of 28 missed doses. On 9/28/23 at approximately 5:10 p.m., the CSD stated there were discrepancies between the external service provider and the residence on which were to supply the medication for Resident #17. She confirmed the medications were not administered to Resident #17.3. Resident #20 was admitted to the residence on 9/12/23. A written practitioner's order, dated 8/31/23, directed the residence to administer fluticasone 50 mcg two sprays in each nostril twice daily. However, the September 2023 MAR for Resident #20 read the medication was pending pharmacy delivery and not administered on 9/13 evening, 9/14, 9/15 morning, 9/16 morning, 9/17, 9/19 morning, 9/19, 9/20 evening, 9/21 and 9/22/23 morning, for a total of 14 missed doses. On 9/28/23 at 5:04 p.m., the CSD confirmed the medication was not administered to Resident #20. 4. Resident #14 was admitted to the residence on 11/8/21 with a diagnosis of heart failure. A written practitioner's order, dated 9/20/23, directed the residence to administer torsemide 40 mg once daily. However, the September 2023 medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #14 read the medication was pending pharmacy delivery and not administered on 9/23 and 9/24/23, for a total of two missed doses. On 9/28/23 at 5:04 p.m., the clinical services director (CSD) confirmed the medication was not administered for Resident #14 for two days in September. 5. InterviewOn 9/28/23 at 4:45 p.m., the administrator stated she expected the qualified medication administration persons (QMAPS) to notify the CSD or the Assistant CSD when medications were pending pharmacy delivery or unavailable. She further stated she expected the physician orders to be followed.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
1496Med/Med Adm-Med Prep/Hnd Tr ICS/S B▼
Findings
Based on observation, record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure qualified medication administration persons (QMAPs) followed national recognized protocols for basic infection control and prevention when preparing and administering medications, affecting three of three sample residents (#14, #21,#22) during medication pass. Findings include: 1. Residence Policy a. The residence's Standard Precautions Policy, dated May 2017, read in part: "Standard precautions shall apply to all residents in all situations ... Perform hand hygiene before having direct contact with residents ... after contact with non intact skin ... after contact with a resident's intact skin ... after contact with inanimate objects in the immediate vicinity of the resident ... after removing loves ... avoid unnecessary touching of surfaces in close proximity to the resident to prevent both contamination from environmental surfaces and transmission of pathogens from contaminated hands to surfaces". 2. ObservationOn 9/28/23 between 7:20 a.m. and 7:58 a.m., Staff #8 prepared medications for Resident #14 wearing gloves. Staff #8 touched the computer, medication cup, a water pitcher located in the dining room area, a plastic cup, medication cart drawers, medication door and her keys. Staff #8 administered medications to Resident #14. She did not remove her gloves or perform any hand hygiene afterwards. Staff #8 prepared medications for Resident #22. Staff #8 touched the computer, medication cup, a plastic spoon, a pudding cup, the medication room door, nose spray and the medication cart drawers. Staff #8 administered medications to Resident #22. She did not remove her gloves or perform any hand hygiene before or afterwards. Staff #8 prepared medications for Resident #21. Staff #8 touched her keys, computer, medication cup, a pen, a water pitcher located in the dining room area, a pudding, a plastic spoon, the medication room door and the medication cart drawers. Staff #8 administered medications to Resident #21 and applied cream to the top of Resident #21's head. Staff #8 removed her gloves and did not perform any hand hygiene before she put on a new pair of gloves. On 9/28/23 at 1:15 p.m., Staff #8 stated she was trained on infection control and performing hand hygiene during medication administration. She acknowledged she should have performed hand hygiene during the medication administration to Residents #14, #21 and #22. 3. Interview On 9/28/23 at 1:18 p.m., the administrator stated she expected the QMAPs to perform hand hygiene after each resident whose medications were administered.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Immediate Training and Education: Training and education have been provided to all QMAPs and caregivers with a specific focus on infection control when preparing and administering medications and providing care. This training has been conducted to ensure that all staff are aware of best practices in hand hygiene, the proper use of personal protective equipment, medication preparation, and other relevant topics. Monthly training sessions will be completed with a strong emphasis on infection control and medication administration best practices, monthly training sessions will be held for all staff, including QMAPs and caregivers. These sessions will be conducted by qualified trainers with expertise in the field. Content of Monthly Training: Each monthly training session will cover a range of topics related to infection control, including but not limited to:Proper hand hygiene techniquesCorrect use of personal protective equipmentMedication preparation and administration proceduresNational and state regulations and guidelines for infection controlReporting of concerns and incidents related to infection control. We will maintain records of each monthly training session, including attendance, topics covered, and any questions or concerns raised by staff. This documentation will be reviewed regularly to ensure that all staff are receiving consistent and up-to-date training. CSD/ACSD/CSC will conduct monthly audits on QMAPs with a random sampling of 3 per month.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note▼
Findings
THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary. The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.7.8 The assisted living residence shall ensure that each staff member and volunteer receives orientation and training, as follows:(A) The assisted living residence shall ensure each staff member or volunteer completes an initial orientation prior to providing any care or services to a resident. Such orientation shall include, at a minimum, all of the following topics: (1) The care and services provided by the assisted living residence; (2) Assignment of duties and responsibilities, specific to the staff member or volunteer; (3) Hand Hygiene and infection control; (4) Emergency response policies and procedures, including: (a) Recognizing emergencies, (b) Relevant emergency contact numbers, (c) Fire response, including facility evacuation procedures (d) Basic first aid, (e) Automated external defibrillator (AED) use, if applicable, (f) Practitioner assessment, and (g) Serious illness injury, and/or death of a resident. (5) Reporting requirements, including occurrence reporting procedures within the facility; (6) Resident rights; (7) House rules; (8) Where to immediately locate a resident ' s advance directive; and (9) An overview of the assisted living residence ' s policies and procedures and how to access them for reference. 14.20 The assisted living residence shall contact the authorized practitioner for clarification of any orders which are incomplete or unclear and obtain new orders in writing. 25.8 Once a resident moves into a secure environment, the assisted living residence shall comply with the following: (B) The assisted living residence shall ensure that admission to and continuing residence in a secure environment is the least restrictive alternative available and is necessary for the physical and psychosocial well-being of the resident. 17.14 Staff who assist feeding a resident shall be trained in the proper techniques for supporting nutrition and hydration by a licensed or registered professional qualified by education and training to assess choking risks, such as a registered nurse, speech language pathologist, or registered dietitian.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/28/2023Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID ZXR3123 deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A licensure revisit was completed on 9/28/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 10/5/22. Deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0610Prsnnl-Crmnl HX Rcrd ChcksS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure a name-based criminal history record check that was conducted by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was completed for each prospective employee prior to staff hire, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents. This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Staff #8 revealed a hire date of 7/26/23; however, the file contained no evidence a name-based criminal background check had been completed. Review of the personnel file for Staff #9 revealed a hire date of 8/29/23 and contained a name-based criminal background check that included a report conducted by the CBI, dated 9/28/23. The background check was performed after the initial staff member's date of hire. Review of the personnel file for Contracted Staff #10 revealed a hire date of 9/24/23 and contained a name-based criminal background check that included a report conducted by the CBI, dated 9/28/23. The background check was performed after the initial staff member's date of hire. The residence's August and September 2023 schedule revealed the following:Staff #8 worked on 8/6-8/7, 8/13-8/14, 8/20-8/21, 8/27-8/28, 9/4, 9/10-9/11, 9/17-9/18 and 9/24-9/25/23. Staff #9 worked on 9/6-9/7, 9/10-9/14, 9/17-9/21 and 9/24-9/25/23. Contracted Staff #10 worked on 9/24 and 9/25/23. On 9/28/23 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated she was aware the name-based criminal background checks were expected to be completed prior to hire. She further stated the previous deficient practice was not corrected because she could not produce the background checks. Additionally, she could not confirm if the backgrounds checks had been completed prior to hire; therefore, they were completed on the day of the onsite visit (9/28/23) for Staff #9 and Contracted Staff #10.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Executive Director and/or Staff Development Director will audit each employee file for background checks for all personnel members and ensure that the results are properly documented in their personnel files over the next 30 days. In cases where background checks were not previously conducted, we will perform the required checks. Staff Development Director will be retrained on the steps required prior to hiring all employees. For the next 3 months prospective employee files will be audited for completion of all required background checks prior to hire. Completed audits will be documented on the audit tracker and reviewed by the ED at the weekly SDD and ED meetings. Ongoing a minimum of 2 employee files will be audited each month and results reviewed at the QAPI meeting each month.
0664Prsnnl-Prsnnl Files RqS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure each personnel file included orientation and training and results of background checks, for three of three sample staff (#8-#10), affecting 41 current residents. This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include:The residence's personnel files for Staff #8 and Contracted Staff #10 revealed no documentation of training as required. On 9/28/23 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the staff development director was requested to provide the completed training for Contracted Staff #10; however, he was unable to provide the documentation. On 9/28/23 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the staff development director confirmed the residence did not have the training for Staff #8 and Contracted Staff #10, as required. On 9/28/23 at 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated she was aware of the required items that each personnel file should have contained. She further stated the previous deficient practice was not corrected because she was unaware contracted staff required training documentation and that the prior administrator did not ensure the files were completed and contained the required items.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
The Staff Development Director will conduct a thorough audit of all personnel files of permanent and agency staff to identify any missing orientation and training documentation and background check results. This review will be completed within the next 30 business days. For personnel files lacking the required documentation, we will collect the missing documentation. This will include obtaining copies of orientation and training certificates and any missing background check results. Orientation and Training that was missed will be provided within 30 days of finding the deficitate. Staff Development Director will be retrained on the steps required prior to hiring all employees or staffing an agency employee. All newly hired staff, including all agency staff will be promptly oriented and trained as part of our regular onboarding process prior to working on the floor. For the next 3 months prospective employee files will be audited for completion of all required background checks prior to hire. Completed audits will be documented on the audit tracker and reviewed by the ED at the weekly SDD and ED meetings. Ongoing a minimum of 2 employee files will be audited each month and results reviewed at the QAPI meeting each month.
0910Em Pr-P/P Res InfoS/S B▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure there was a readily available roster of current residents along with a diagram showing room locations, affecting 41 current residents. This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/5/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include:On 9/28/23 at 8:07 a.m., a resident roster was requested. On 9/28/23 at 8:28 a.m., the administrator provided a list of residents, their room numbers and emergency contact information. However, there was no diagram that showed room locations. On 9/28/23 at approximately 4:30 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware that a residence diagram showing room numbers was required to be included with a resident roster. She added, she was not aware of the requirement, therefore, the previous deficient practice was not corrected.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Our staff has created a comprehensive roster of current residents, including their names and room locations. A diagram showing room locations will also be developed and updated at least monthly. Placement of Roster and Diagram: The roster of current residents and room location diagram will be placed in a readily accessible behind the front desk. This has been completed. All facility staff will be trained on the locations of the resident roster and room location diagram. Monthly and ongoing audits will be completed by ED to ensure presence and accuracy of the resident roster and room location diagram.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note▼
Findings
Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
Reportable Occurrences
15 records3/13/2026Neglect · ID 2623B432003Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 3/13/26, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported neglect of a client. Client (A)'s representative discovered an injury on client (A)'s head and reported it to the staff. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity suspended staff (1) and (2), contacted police and medical providers, conducted interviews, and reviewed records. Client (A) was admitted to the emergency department for evaluation, and treatment was provided. Both staff confirmed checking on client (A), but not completing a full visual inspection safety check per policy. Both staff failed to follow the facility's policy and procedures, with the potential for harm. The facility determined a malfunction in their fall alert system and fixed it. Client (A) returned to the facility, and the following was implemented: frequent checks, encouragement to use assistive devices, non-skid footwear, and placing items within reach. The facility retrained both staff on completing a full visual check and ensured compliance. Both staff returned to their assigned duties. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 5/15/2026 · released to the public 5/22/2026.
10/28/2025Neglect · ID 2523B432006Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 10/28/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported neglect of a client. Client (A) was found on the floor by staff and reported falling and experiencing pain and a head injury. Staff (1) failed to report the incident according to policy, causing significant potential harm to client (A). During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity suspended staff (1), contacted police, reviewed records, and conducted interviews. Client (A)'s medical provider assessed and treated their injuries. Staff (1) confirmed not following policy after a client fell with an injury. Staff (1)'s employment was terminated on 10/29/25. The facility increased monitoring of client (A), retrained staff on fall policy and procedures, and confirmed their compliance. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 3/27/2026 · released to the public 4/7/2026.
4/11/2025Neglect · ID 2523B432005Reported on time: No▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 4/16/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event of neglect. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity assessed the client, conducted interviews and record review. The event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. The department review of the occurrence investigation was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was/was not submitted within the required timeframe. In addition, this event has been identified for further investigation by the Department. An onsite investigation was conducted by a representative from the State agency. For results of that on-site investigation, please reference https://cdphe.colorado.gov/find-and-compare-facilities, specifically the inspection dated 5/7/25, Event ID #PDRZ11.
Publication
Sent to facility 11/5/2025 · released to the public 11/12/2025.
3/30/2025Physical Abuse · ID 2523B432004Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 3/31/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported physical abuse of a client. Client (A) was found on the floor in the hallway with Client (B) kicking them in the back. During the course of the investigation the healthcare entity ensured the clients were separated before the police were notified. Client (A)’s injuries were treated. Client (A) stated Client (B) pushed them, and punched them as well. Client (B) has cognitive impairment and could not be interviewed. Client (B)’s medications were adjusted and their behavioral care plan was updated with interventions. Both clients were placed on increased monitoring. Staff trained again on de-escalation and redirecting clients. The event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 8/28/2025 · released to the public 9/4/2025.
1/11/2025Physical Abuse · ID 2523B432003Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 1/11/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported physical abuse of a client. Reportedly, client (A) pushed client (B) to the ground causing them to hit their head. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity separated the clients prior to notifying law enforcement, completed an assessment, and conducted interviews. Client (B) was transported to the hospital for evaluation and no injuries were noted. Due to cognitive impairments, neither client could provide additional detail about the event. Staff did not witness the event, but heard client (B) yell out and when they arrived found them on the ground and client (A) standing in the area taunting client (B). Client (B) was moved to a new room. Client (A) received a medication adjustment and increased supervision. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 8/1/2025 · released to the public 8/8/2025.
1/6/2025Physical Abuse · ID 2523B432002Reported on time: No▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 1/6/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported physical abuse of a client. Staff witnessed client (A) push client (B) onto the couch after client (B) hit the couch with their cane. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity separated the clients prior to notifying law enforcement and conducted assessments and interviews. Due to cognitive impairment neither client could recall the event. The facility implemented increased safety monitoring, a room change for client (B), medication review for client (A), and staff education. While physical contact occurred, the client did not sustain an injury. The event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was not submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 7/16/2025 · released to the public 7/23/2025.
12/19/2024Physical Abuse · ID 2423B432007Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 12/19/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a physical abuse event. Reportedly, client (A) struck client (B) with his walking device, and in return, client (B) pushed client (A). Client (A) fell and hit his head with a visible injury. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity called 911 and client (A) was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. Once medically cleared, he returned. Staff indicated client (A) was agitated and happened to cross paths with client (B), which led to a physical altercation. A medical and medication review was requested due to behavioral changes. Staff started safety monitoring and the event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 6/24/2025 · released to the public 7/2/2025.
8/29/2024Physical Abuse · ID 2423B432005Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 8/30/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported physical abuse of a client. During the course of the investigation the healthcare entity ensured the clients were separated before the police were notified. Client (B) was witnessed holding onto Client (A) against their will causing a skin tear to client (A)’s hand. First aid provided. Client (B) was evaluated at the hospital for behaviors and their medications were adjusted. One-to-on supervision provided to Client (B) before Client (B) moved to another facility. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 5/6/2025 · released to the public 5/13/2025.
6/2/2024Physical Abuse · ID 2423B432004Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 6/2/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported physical abuse of a client. During the course of the investigation the healthcare entity ensured the clients were separated before the police were notified. The staff witnessed Client (A) and (B) in a physical altercation with Client (B) being the aggressor which resulted in Client (B) punching Client (A) in the face. Client (A) sustained redness to their face. Both clients were placed with increased supervision to include a sitter. Client (B) was seen by their physician to address changes in behavior. The staff will monitor for non-verbal communication of unmet needs that may trigger behaviors and address them accordingly. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 3/26/2025 · released to the public 4/7/2025.
5/2/2024Physical Abuse · ID 2423B432003Reported on time: No▼
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:
On
FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION:
The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police, physician, families/guardians and ombudsman.
DEPARTMENT FINDINGS:
In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed.
The agency/facility's response to this occurrence violated licensing standards by failing to report the occurrence within the required timeframes.
Publication
Sent to facility 3/7/2025 · released to the public 3/14/2025.