19
Inspections
17
Deficiencies
0
Actual Harm or Above
2
Occurrences
July 21, 2026
Last Inspection
S/S A/B Minimal potential

The most recent inspection of EDDIE'S HOUSE on record is dated July 21, 2026. Across 19 published inspections, state surveyors cited 17 deficiencies, none of which reached the actual-harm level.

Colorado publishes inspections on a rolling window, so older surveys may no longer appear. Citation codes 0000 and 9999 are the surveyor's opening and closing comments, not deficiencies, and are excluded from the counts above. Where the state required one, the facility's own plan of correction is shown beneath the finding it answers.

Provider Information

Status
Active
Facility Type
Assisted Living Residence/Alternative Care Facility (Medicaid)
Administrator
Aragon, Alicia
Owner
TRIPLERRR LLC
Phone
(719) 560-9415
Payor Source
Medicaid, Private Pay
City
PUEBLO
ZIP
81004

Inspections & Citations

19 inspections · 17 deficiencies
7/21/2026Licensure (Re-licensure) · ID 1SND11No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
An administrative relicensure survey was completed on 7/27/2026. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
5/4/2026Licensure Complaint · ID A7R4113 deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A licensure complaint survey, prompted by #CO42166 and #CO42171, was conducted on 5/11/26 with three deficiencies cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
1110Res Care Srvs-Min Srvs Res AgrS/S A
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to provide personal services sufficient to meet the needs of the resident, affecting one sample resident (#1) of 12 residents. Findings include:1. Record ReviewReview of a blank resident agreement, approved on April 2023, revealed language in pertinent part; "Through its certified staff, Provider will administer Resident ' s medications and Resident ' s medications, (unless there is a self administer order signed by a physician), will be stored in a locked, and properly labeled cabinet, if medications are not approved for self administration. All medications will be stored, administered and/or monitored in accordance with Colorado State laws."A record review for Resident #1 revealed an oxygen order reading,"Portable oxygen concentrator with oxygen mask for diagnosis of hypoxia, shortness of breath and cough." The order did not specify specific elements such as dose, liters per minute (LPM) and when to use. Additionally, the order expired on 11/6/25.2. InterviewsAn interview was conducted with the medication manager on 5/4/26 at 1:48 p.m. She said the order should have the dose and frequency indicated, and if the medication is expired. She added that it should have included more information than it had. A second interview was conducted on 5/5/26 at 8:58 a.m. with the medication manager. She said the order did not meet her or the agency's expectation of a complete order. She said the order did not look like other orders she had seen in the past. The medication manager said, "It does not meet my expectations. It doesn't look like other oxygen orders that I have seen". An interview with the administrator on 5/5/26 at 1:40 p.m. revealed the administrator was aware of what a correct medication order would include. The administrator acknowledged that the oxygen order was not appropriately written and that it had expired.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Goals for CorrectionEnsure Compliance with Resident Care Regulations: All personal care services must meet the outlined requirements under 6 CCR 1011-1, ensuring a safe and supportive environment. Enhance Staff Training: Equip staff with the knowledge necessary to recognize and address incomplete or expired medical orders and to properly manage resident care. Establish a System for Monitoring Orders: Implement a regular review system for medication and treatment orders to ensure they meet resident needs consistently. Corrective ActionsReview and Update Medical Orders:Action: Conduct a comprehensive review of all residents' medical orders to ensure completeness and compliance with regulations. Specifically, the oxygen order for Resident #1 will be updated to include necessary details such as dosage, liters per minute (LPM), and usage instructions. Timeline: Complete review and update by May 15, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager and Administrator. Staff Training:Action: Develop and conduct mandatory training sessions for all nursing and medication management staff on the requirements for complete medication orders, the importance of monitoring expiration dates, and the system for identifying and reporting resident concerns. Timeline: Initial training to be completed by May 20, 2026, with refresher training scheduled every six months. Responsible Party: Administrator in collaboration with the training coordinator. Implementation of Monitoring System:Action: Establish a systematic process for regularly reviewing and updating all medication and treatment orders. This system should include:A checklist for staff to verify the completeness of orders. A schedule for reviewing orders every 30 days to ensure they remain current and compliant with regulations. Timeline: Implementation of the system by May 25, 2026. Responsible Party: AdministratorDocumentation Protocol:Action: Review and revise documentation protocols to ensure that all staff members are aware of the procedures for handling expired orders and the steps required to obtain new orders promptly. Timeline: Complete revisions by May 30, 2026. Responsible Party: Administrator. Quality Assurance Measures:Action: Conduct monthly audits of medication orders and treatment plans to ensure compliance with 6 CCR 1011-1 and to identify any discrepancies or issues that need addressing. Timeline: Start audits by June 1, 2026, and report findings monthly. Responsible Party: AdministratorMonitoring and EvaluationMonthly Review: Monitor the effectiveness of the corrective actions through monthly evaluations and audits of medication orders and treatment plans (quality assurance). Monitoring is ongoing
1410Res Rts-Inv Ab/Neg Alleg or Inj Unk Org A/NS/S B
Findings
Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to investigate allegations of abuse in accordance with the residence's written policy, affecting 12 current residents. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence's policy,"Abuse: Neglect", undated, read specific in part, "The residence is to document all injuries of a known or unknown source." The policy further noted the following instructions for an investigation to occur, "Who- identify the resident (s) involved, staff observers or staff who may be involved or implicated. Review staff schedules to ascertain that all possible individuals that may have knowledge of the event are interviewed." However, the policy was missing the required elements: - Reporting requirements to the appropriate agencies such as the Adult Protection Services of the appropriate county Department of Social Services, and to the assisted living residence administrator;- A requirement that the assisted living residence notify the legal representative about the allegation within 24 hours of the assisted living residence becoming aware of the allegation; - A requirement that the resident shall be protected from potential future abuse and neglect, and/or exploitation while the investigation is being conducted; - A requirement that if the alleged neglect or abuse is verified, the assisted living residence shall take appropriate corrective action; and - A requirement that a copy of the report with the investigation findings shall be retained by the facility and available for Department review. The administrator responded to an email request for all investigations of abuse and neglect on 5/4/26 at 11:51 a.m. noting, "Per policy, we have not had any grievances reported to owner or admin. There has been no abuse reported to the owner or admin for investigations to log."2. InterviewsThe house manager said law enforcement came to the residence on 4/4/26 due to allegations of a staff member not being able to care for residents because she was incapacitated. The house manager stated staff #2 was found on the sofa unable to respond and the house manager was notified by graveyard shift staff who came in to relieve staff #2. She stated the law enforcement officer did not seem concerned when he arrived and the residence did not investigate further into the potential neglect allegation. In a later interview , the house manager said if there was an allegation of abuse or neglect, the residence was required to investigate, however, she did not think there were any allegations. An interview with confidential individual #3 revealed a law enforcement officer had asked the house manager about her pushing a resident, and confidential individual #3 acknowledged that the house manager did not mention that part of the conversation when describing the officer's visit to the administrator, and that the house manager had not been truthful to the administrator regarding the details of why the police had been there. On 5/5/26 at 8:53 a.m., the house manager and the medication manager stated that law enforcement officers showed up to the residence on 4/4/26 due to reports of a staff member being under the influence of drugs and unable to care for residents. On 5/5/26 at 1:40 p.m., the administrator confirmed law enforcement was at the residence on 4/4/26 due to the allegation of caregiver neglect (a caregiver being incapacitated). The administrator said the residence did not conduct an investigation because there was no concern from law enforcement and the residence staff had not been aware of any allegations of abuse. The administrator said she had observed the residents on 4/4/26 and they all seemed ok so she believed it wasn't necessary. She stated she did not request a report because the house manager told her what had happened. An interview with the house manager was conducted on 5/5/26 at 8:58 a.m. She said the police were called about an issue with the staff and residents, but there was nothing that the police could pursue. The officer looked into the t.v. room and asked if everyone was okay, they said yes and he left. The house manager said she did not conduct an investigation because she did not know who was involved. She said "I didn't think anything happened. To investigate we have to know who is involved no names were given."On 5/5/26 at 12:00 the house manager was interviewed again and stated "if an allegation of abuse was made, I would need to investigate and would reach out to the administrator."
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Goals for CorrectionEnsure Continued Resident Satisfaction: Maintain an environment where all residents feel safe, respected, and valued. Enhance Staff Training: Equip staff with the necessary skills and knowledge to provide high-quality care. Establish Effective Feedback Mechanisms: Foster open communication between residents and staff to quickly address any concerns. Corrective ActionsOngoing Monitoring:Action: Implement a schedule for regular follow-up interviews with residents to monitor satisfaction and identify any new concerns. Timeline: Initiate follow-ups starting May 15, 2026, with subsequent interviews every three months. Responsible Party: House Manager. Staff Training:Action: Develop and conduct a comprehensive training program for staff focusing on resident care, communication skills, and recognizing signs of neglect or abuse. Timeline: Complete initial training by June 1, 2026, and schedule refresher courses every six months. Responsible Party: Administrator in collaboration with a training coordinator. Feedback Mechanism:Action: Establish a structured feedback system that includes:Regular surveys to assess resident satisfaction. Suggestion boxes placed in common areas to encourage anonymous feedback. Timeline: Implement by May 20, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager. Regular Staff Meetings:Action: Conduct bi-weekly staff meetings to discuss resident feedback, care strategies, and areas for improvement. Encourage team collaboration and open discussions about resident needs. Timeline: Begin meetings on May 10, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager. Enhance Reporting Procedures:Action: Review and improve existing reporting procedures for any resident concerns, ensuring that all staff members are aware of their responsibilities in reporting and addressing issues. Timeline: Complete review by May 30, 2026. Responsible Party: Administrator. Monitoring and EvaluationMonthly Review: Monitor the effectiveness of the corrective actions through monthly evaluations of resident feedback and staff performance. This process will be ongoing**********************************************************************************************************************************************Investigation Process for Allegations of AbuseImmediate Response:Safety First: Upon receiving a concern from a resident, immediate steps are taken to ensure their safety and well-being. Documentation: Staff must record the concern in detail, including the date, time, and nature of the allegation. Adherence to Policy:The agency follows a defined protocol, which includes:Reporting Requirements: Allegations must be reported to relevant authorities, such as adult protection services. Notification of Legal Representatives: The resident's legal representative is informed within 24 hours of learning about the allegation. Investigation Protocols: The facility's written policy outlines specific steps for conducting investigations. Investigation Steps:Data Collection: Identify and interview individuals involved (residents, staff, witnesses). Thorough Documentation: Capture all relevant details following the "who, what, when, where, how, and why" framework. Objective Analysis: Evaluate evidence, including medical records and incident reports, to determine the validity of the claims. Conclusion and Reporting:A summary is prepared to indicate whether the allegations were substantiated, along with any corrective actions taken. Documentation of the investigation is retained for review by regulatory bodies. Policy UpdatesThe facility recognized gaps in its policies and took the following steps to address them:Inclusion of Essential Elements: Updated definitions of abuse and neglect, clarified reporting protocols, and specified investigation procedures. Regulatory Compliance: Ensured that all policy updates align with state and federal regulations. Staff Training on Policy UpdatesStaff training on the revised policies was conducted. This training included:Specific instructions on the new definitions of abuse and neglect. Detailed procedures for responding to allegations, conducting investigations, and documentation requirements. Emphasis on protecting residents during investigations and understanding their rights.
2112Fd/Din Srvs-M/Dr/Sn M Incld/SubS/S B
Findings
Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to ensure meals were nutritionally balanced with sufficiently available nutritional options to satisfy resident appetites, affecting 12 current residents. Findings include:1. ObservationOn 5/4/26, at 5:13 p.m. the dinner consisted of macaroni noodles with ground meat mixed in, a slice of bread, and a serving of corn. Observations failed to reveal any fruit or additional vegetables as a substitute were offered. On 5/5/26, breakfast was listed on the menu as cereal with a side of fruit. At 8:46 a.m. observation revealed three boxed cereals on the countertop. Milk and a canister of sugar were observed on the counter. No fruit or vegetable was observed to be offered. On 5/5/26 at 10:40 a.m. the medication manager was unable to locate any fruit to serve to the residents, including what the menu indicated should have been served at breakfast. On 5/5/26 and 5/6/26, the choice of snacks in-between meals being provided were microwave popcorn or a "Cup of Noodle" instant soup. On 5/5/26 at 11:49 a.m., lunch consisted of the macaroni noodles with ground meat mixed in, and a slice of white bread. The macaroni and meat was similar to what was observed being served for dinner on 5/4/26, except peas and carrots were mixed in for the 5/5/26 lunch serving. 2. Record ReviewA resident agreement with a finalized date of April 2023, read in part, "Meals and Snacks: Three (3) nutritionally well-balanced meals per day are included in Resident ' s Basic Services Rate. Healthy snacks would be readily available."3. InterviewAn interview was conducted on 5/5/26 at 10:40 a.m. with the medication manager and the house manager. The medication manager said the residence had no fruit cups available. She said the only fruit available at that time was a single can of applesauce, however, there was no can opener available to open it. The house manager said she created the meal plans for the residence and the plans were created from the resident input only. The house manager said a healthy meal consisted of a protein, vegetable, a side of fruit and a starch. On 5/5/26 at 1:40 p.m. the administrator said a healthy meal included meat, vegetables and a starch.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Goals for CorrectionEnsure Nutritional Compliance: All meals and snacks will meet nutritional standards as outlined in resident agreements. Enhance Meal Variety: Implement a diverse menu that includes a variety of fruits and vegetables. Improve Resident Satisfaction: Engage residents in meal planning to better meet their dietary preferences and needs. Corrective ActionsMenu Revision:Action: Revise weekly menu to include at least one serving of fruit and one serving of vegetables at each meal. Timeline: Complete by June 15, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager and Administrator. Stocking of Nutritional Options:Action: Ensure that fresh fruits (e.g., apples, bananas, oranges) and vegetables are available daily. Timeline: Inventory and restock by June 14, 2026. Responsible Party: Kitchen Manager. Training for Staff:Action: Conduct training sessions for kitchen and caregiving staff on nutritional guidelines and meal preparation. Timeline: Schedule training by June 20, 2026. Responsible Party: Administrator. Implementation of Snack Options:Action: Introduce a variety of healthy snacks (e.g., yogurt, nuts, whole-grain options) alongside current offerings. Timeline: New snacks available by June 15, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager and AdministratorResident Feedback Sessions:Action: Organize monthly meetings with residents to gather input on meal preferences and satisfaction. Timeline: First meeting scheduled by June 1, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager. Inventory and Equipment Check:Action: Conduct an inventory of kitchen supplies, including can openers and utensils, to ensure all necessary tools are available for meal preparation. Timeline: Inventory completed by June 10, 2026. Responsible Party: Kitchen Manager. Monitoring and EvaluationMonthly Review: Conduct monthly reviews of meal offerings and resident satisfaction surveys until compliance is met. This action will be ongoing
5/4/2026Licensure Complaint · ID 0P8E112 deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A certification complaint, prompted by #CO42170 and #CO42165, was completed on 5/11/26. Three deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0158Ind Rts-Adtl Crit-Prov Own/Ctrl-Res-Food
Findings
Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to ensure meals were nutritionally balanced with sufficiently available nutritional options to satisfy resident appetites, affecting 12 current residents. Findings include:1. ObservationOn 5/4/26, at 5:13 p.m. the dinner consisted of macaroni noodles with ground meat mixed in, a slice of bread, and a serving of corn. Observations failed to reveal any fruit or additional vegetables as a substitute were offered. On 5/5/26, breakfast was listed on the menu as cereal with a side of fruit. At 8:46 a.m. observation revealed three boxed cereals on the countertop. Milk and a canister of sugar were observed on the counter. No fruit or vegetable was observed to be offered. On 5/5/26 at 10:40 a.m. the medication manager was unable to locate any fruit to serve to the residents, including what the menu indicated should have been served at breakfast. On 5/5/26 and 5/6/26, the choice of snacks in-between meals being provided were microwave popcorn or a "Cup of Noodle" instant soup. On 5/5/26 at 11:49 a.m., lunch consisted of the macaroni noodles with ground meat mixed in, and a slice of white bread. The macaroni and meat was similar to what was observed being served for dinner on 5/4/26, except peas and carrots were mixed in for the 5/5/26 lunch serving. 2. Record ReviewA resident agreement with a finalized date of April 2023, read in part, "Meals and Snacks: Three (3) nutritionally well-balanced meals per day are included in Resident ' s Basic Services Rate. Healthy snacks would be readily available."3. InterviewAn interview was conducted on 5/5/26 at 10:40 a.m. with the medication manager and the house manager. The medication manager said the residence had no fruit cups available. She said the only fruit available at that time was a single can of applesauce, however, there was no can opener available to open it. The house manager said she created the meal plans for the residence and the plans were created from the resident input only. The house manager said a healthy meal consisted of a protein, vegetable, a side of fruit and a starch. On 5/5/26 at 1:40 p.m. the administrator said a healthy meal included meat, vegetables and a starch.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Goals for CorrectionEnsure Nutritional Compliance: All meals and snacks will meet nutritional standards as outlined in resident agreements. Enhance Meal Variety: Implement a diverse menu that includes a variety of fruits and vegetables. Improve Resident Satisfaction: Engage residents in meal planning to better meet their dietary preferences and needs. Corrective ActionsMenu Revision:Action: Revise weekly menu to include at least one serving of fruit and one serving of vegetables at each meal. Timeline: Complete by June 15, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager and Administrator. Stocking of Nutritional Options:Action: Ensure that fresh fruits (e.g., apples, bananas, oranges) and vegetables are available daily. Timeline: Inventory and restock by June 14, 2026. Responsible Party: Kitchen Manager. Training for Staff:Action: Conduct training sessions for kitchen and caregiving staff on nutritional guidelines and meal preparation. Timeline: Schedule training by June 20, 2026. Responsible Party: Administrator. Implementation of Snack Options:Action: Introduce a variety of healthy snacks (e.g., yogurt, nuts, whole-grain options) alongside current offerings. Timeline: New snacks available by June 15, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager and AdministratorResident Feedback Sessions:Action: Organize monthly meetings with residents to gather input on meal preferences and satisfaction. Timeline: First meeting scheduled by June 1, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager. Inventory and Equipment Check:Action: Conduct an inventory of kitchen supplies, including can openers and utensils, to ensure all necessary tools are available for meal preparation. Timeline: Inventory completed by June 10, 2026. Responsible Party: Kitchen Manager. Monitoring and EvaluationMonthly Review: Conduct monthly reviews of meal offerings and resident satisfaction surveys until compliance is met (quality assurance). This action will be ongoing
0796PA Req-P/P-MANE
Findings
Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to investigate allegations of abuse in accordance with the residence's written policy, affecting 12 current residents. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence's policy,"Abuse: Neglect", undated, read specific in part, "The residence is to document all injuries of a known or unknown source." The policy further noted the following instructions for an investigation to occur, "Who- identify the resident (s) involved, staff observers or staff who may be involved or implicated. Review staff schedules to ascertain that all possible individuals that may have knowledge of the event are interviewed." However, the policy was missing the required elements: - Reporting requirements to the appropriate agencies such as the Adult Protection Services of the appropriate county Department of Social Services, and to the assisted living residence administrator;- A requirement that the assisted living residence notify the legal representative about the allegation within 24 hours of the assisted living residence becoming aware of the allegation; - A requirement that the resident shall be protected from potential future abuse and neglect, and/or exploitation while the investigation is being conducted; - A requirement that if the alleged neglect or abuse is verified, the assisted living residence shall take appropriate corrective action; and - A requirement that a copy of the report with the investigation findings shall be retained by the facility and available for Department review. The administrator responded to an email request for all investigations of abuse and neglect on 5/4/26 at 11:51 a.m. noting, "Per policy, we have not had any grievances reported to owner or admin. There has been no abuse reported to the owner or admin for investigations to log."2. InterviewsThe house manager said law enforcement came to the residence on 4/4/26 due to allegations of a staff member not being able to care for residents because she was incapacitated. The house manager stated staff #2 was found on the sofa unable to respond and the house manager was notified by graveyard shift staff who came in to relieve staff #2. She stated the law enforcement officer did not seem concerned when he arrived and the residence did not investigate further into the potential neglect allegation. In a later interview , the house manager said if there was an allegation of abuse or neglect, the residence was required to investigate, however, she did not think there were any allegations. An interview with confidential individual #3 revealed a law enforcement officer had asked the house manager about her pushing a resident, and confidential individual #3 acknowledged that the house manager did not mention that part of the conversation when describing the officer's visit to the administrator, and that the house manager had not been truthful to the administrator regarding the details of why the police had been there. On 5/5/26 at 8:53 a.m., the house manager and the medication manager stated that law enforcement officers showed up to the residence on 4/4/26 due to reports of a staff member being under the influence of drugs and unable to care for residents. On 5/5/26 at 1:40 p.m., the administrator confirmed law enforcement was at the residence on 4/4/26 due to the allegation of caregiver neglect (a caregiver being incapacitated). The administrator said the residence did not conduct an investigation because there was no concern from law enforcement and the residence staff had not been aware of any allegations of abuse. The administrator said she had observed the residents on 4/4/26 and they all seemed ok so she believed it wasn't necessary. She stated she did not request a report because the house manager told her what had happened. An interview with the house manager was conducted on 5/5/26 at 8:58 a.m. She said the police were called about an issue with the staff and residents, but there was nothing that the police could pursue. The officer looked into the t.v. room and asked if everyone was okay, they said yes and he left. The house manager said she did not conduct an investigation because she did not know who was involved. She said "I didn't think anything happened. To investigate we have to know who is involved no names were given."On 5/5/26 at 12:00 the house manager was interviewed again and stated "if an allegation of abuse was made, I would need to investigate and would reach out to the administrator."
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Investigation Summary: No substantiated claims of neglect were found after interviews with fourteen residents. However, actions for continued oversight and improvements have been identified. Goals for CorrectionEnsure Continued Resident Satisfaction: Maintain an environment where all residents feel safe, respected, and valued. Enhance Staff Training: Equip staff with the necessary skills and knowledge to provide high-quality care. Establish Effective Feedback Mechanisms: Foster open communication between residents and staff to quickly address any concerns. Corrective ActionsOngoing Monitoring:Action: Implement a schedule for regular follow-up interviews with residents to monitor satisfaction and identify any new concerns. Timeline: Initiate follow-ups starting May 15, 2026, with subsequent interviews every three months. Responsible Party: House Manager. Staff Training:Action: Develop and conduct a comprehensive training program for staff focusing on resident care, communication skills, and recognizing signs of neglect or abuse. Timeline: Complete initial training by June 1, 2026, and schedule refresher courses every six months. Responsible Party: Administrator in collaboration with a training coordinator. Feedback Mechanism:Action: Establish a structured feedback system that includes:Regular surveys to assess resident satisfaction. Suggestion boxes placed in common areas to encourage anonymous feedback. Timeline: Implement by May 20, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager. Regular Staff Meetings:Action: Conduct bi-weekly staff meetings to discuss resident feedback, care strategies, and areas for improvement. Encourage team collaboration and open discussions about resident needs. Timeline: Begin meetings on May 10, 2026. Responsible Party: House Manager. Enhance Reporting Procedures:Action: Review and improve existing reporting procedures for any resident concerns, ensuring that all staff members are aware of their responsibilities in reporting and addressing issues. Timeline: Complete review by May 30, 2026. Responsible Party: Administrator. Monitoring and EvaluationMonthly Review: Monitor the effectiveness of the corrective actions through monthly evaluations of resident feedback and staff performance. This process will be ongoing. This training was conducted 5/12/2025.*********How will the facility investigate allegations of abuse if resident responses indicate concerns? How does the agency plan to follow its policy? How did the facility update its policy missing the necessary elements? When did staff receiving training on these policy updates?Response:All these elements are in our current policy, and I quote as I pulled the wording directly from the regulation and cited it:Requirements:(E) It is required that a resident shall be protected from potential future abuse and neglect while the investigation is being conducted,(F) It is required that if the alleged neglect or abuse is verified, the assisted living residence shall take appropriate corrective action, and(G) It is required that a copy of the report with the investigation findings shall be retained by the facility and available for Department review. Is the injury “suspicious” because of ANY of the following?The extent of the injuryThe location of the injury (the injury is in an areanot vulnerable to trauma)The number of injuries observed at one point.in timeThe incidence of injuries over a periodDEFINITIONS -13.11 The assisted living residence shall investigate all allegations of abuse, neglect, or exploitation of residents in accordance with section 5 and its written policy which shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (A) Reporting requirements to the appropriate agencies such as the adult protection services of the appropriate county Department of Social Services and to the assisted living residence administrator,(B) A requirement that the assisted living residence notify the legal representative about the allegation within 24 hours of the assisted living residence becoming aware of the allegation,(C) The process for investigating such allegations, CODE OF COLORADO REGULATIONS 6 CCR 1011-1 Chapter 7 Health Facilities and Emergency Medical Services Division 41(D) How the assisted living residence will document the investigation process to evidence the required reporting and that a thorough investigation was conducted,(E) A requirement that the resident shall be protected from potential future abuse and neglect while the investigation is being conducted,(F) A requirement that if the alleged neglect or abuse is verified, the assisted living residence shall take appropriate corrective action, and(G) A requirement that a copy of the report with the investigation findings shall be retained by the facility and available for Department review. Serious Bodily Injury: Section 2011 (19)(A) of the Affordable Care Act provides that “serious bodily injury” is defined as an injury with:extreme physical pain.with the possibility of loss or impairment of a bodily member, mental faculty, or organ.a risk of death; orthat may require surgery, hospitalization, or rehabilitation. When in doubt about whether an injury qualifies as “serious bodily injury” report using the earlier timeline. Abuse: The willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Thisincluded deprivation of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Physical Abuse: Hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. Also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. From 483.13(b)(c)Neglect: The failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. From 483.13 (b)(c). Misappropriation of resident property: The deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident’s belongings or money without the resident’s consent. From Administrative Rules of COLORADO (ARSD). All Others:any death resulting from other than natural causes originating on facility property such as accidents, abuse, negligence, or suicide.any missing resident– individual away from facility without staff knowledge of department or exit time and destination.any fire with structural damage or where injury or death occurs.any partial or complete evacuation of the facility resulting from natural disaster; orany loss of utilities, such as electricity, natural gas, telephone, emergency generator, fire alarm, sprinklers, and other critical equipment necessary for the operation of the facility for more than 24 hours. CONDUCTING AND DOCUMENTING AN INVESTIGATION -When conducting and documenting an investigation, focus on the “problem.” Clearly identify it, stay on message, say it clearly, and keep it simple. Use simple terminology whenever possible. Answer the following:Who – identify resident(s) involved (please use names not initials or numbers), staff observers or staff who may be involved or[+] implicated ([+]please provide Date of hire, Social Security Number, Date of birth, Address, and Phone contact information, Licensure or Certification information, Any previous disciplinary action, Date of termination if applicable) , family or other visitors. Review staff schedules to ascertain that all possible individuals that may have knowledge of the event are interviewed. What – describe the event, use all senses, be objective. See/Sight – pallor, sweating, deformities, bruises, edema, redness, body fluid color, pupil reaction. Feel – dampness, localized heat, localized coldness, pulses. Hear – complaints of pain, moaning, breathing pattern, heart sounds, blood pressure. Smell – fruity odors, fecal or urine odors, foul smelling drainage, alcohol breath. When – document the time. Accuracy is critical. If taking information from the electronic medical record (EMR) ensure, when entries are made later, staff record the actual time of the occurrence as the EMR system time stamps the entry time. Where – document the location, be as descriptive as possible. How – description of how the event may have occurred with the acquired information from those interviewed if there were no witnesses and/or the individual is not a good historian. Do review the resident’s BIMs score. Why – other particulars such as care plan not followed, staff not available, resident contributing factors, etc. These are areas that may be fruit for litigation, but also a great opportunity for review of the system and education. Conclusion – This is a summary statement that indicates an allegation or suspicion of abuse/neglect was either substantiated or not substantiated. Termination of an employee or having them terminate themselves does not automatically indicate whether the provider was able to substantiate an allegation; for example– With completion of internal investigation, we were able to substantiate the allegation that (name) made inappropriate advances toward (name), it was our administrative decision to terminate (name’s) employment and the Board of Nursing was notified; the provider made changes to a policy/procedure; education/re-education was provided to staff; care plans were reviewed/revised as necessary; a plausible explanation was gained for how an injury of unknown source occurred, personal property was found or restitution was made. In the event reporting of other reportable events, these are times where a staff “debriefing” needed and is an opportunity to evaluate system.processes and provide a learning/education opportunity.************************************************************************************************************************************************************The facility has established a comprehensive process for investigating allegations of abuse when resident concerns arise. Here is a detailed breakdown of how these investigations will be conducted, adherence to agency policy, and the updates to existing procedures:Investigation Process for Allegations of AbuseInitial Response to Concerns:Immediate Action: If a resident express concerns about potential abuse, staff must ensure the resident's safety and provide necessary support. Documentation: All concerns must be documented promptly to maintain an accurate record. Policy Adherence:The facility follows specific regulatory requirements, including:Reporting to appropriate agencies (e.g., adult protection services). Notifying the resident's legal representative within 24 hours of the allegation. Conducting a thorough investigation as per the established policy. Investigation Steps:Gather Information: Identify individuals involved (residents, staff, witnesses) and gather relevant details. Interview Process: Conduct interviews with all parties involved, ensuring a non-biased approach. Objective Documentation: Document the findings clearly, focusing on who, what, when, where, how, and why aspects of the incident. Analysis of Evidence: Review medical records, incident reports, and any other relevant documentation. Conclusion of Investigation:Summarize findings in a clear statement indicating whether the allegations were substantiated and outline any corrective actions taken. Ensure that the findings are retained within the facility for review by relevant departments. Policy UpdatesThe facility updated its policies to include essential elements that align with regulatory requirements. This included:Enhanced definitions of abuse and neglect. Clarification of reporting protocols and investigation processes. Procedures for protecting residents during investigations. Staff Training on Policy UpdatesStaff received training on the updated policies. This training focused on:Understanding the definitions and implications of abuse and neglect. The steps to take when allegations arise, including documentation and reporting. The importance of protecting residents during the investigation process.
12/5/2025Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID DJ8312No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A revisit survey was completed on 12/5/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 7/23/25. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
12/5/2025Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID ET0N12No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A revisit survey was completed on 12/5/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 7/23/25. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
7/22/2025Revisit: Licensure and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID 5U0C12No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A Relicensure Survey and Complaint Revisit was completed on 7/23/25 for all previous deficiency cited on 9/3/24. The residence is in compliance with all regulations surveyed.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note
Findings
Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
7/22/2025Licensure Complaint · ID DJ83111 deficiency
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38635, was completed on 7/23/25. A deficiency was cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0290LicProc-DeptOvrst-Srvy/Inspct Ensr Cmply-POCS/S A
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to provide, upon request, copies of the resident records requested by the department affecting 1 former sample resident (#4). Findings Include:On 7/22/25 at approximately 12:30 p.m., Resident #4's records were requested. On 7/22/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m., the administrator stated that Resident #4's records were unavailable because the file room was inaccessible due to construction in the facility's basement.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Former residents #4 historical files were temporary inaccessible because of construction. All active residents files were available. The construction project has been completed, contractors materials/equipment have been removed, and access to resident filesIn the future the files archived will be kept accessible if these files are needed for review. Construction projects will be better directed so that their materials do not obstruct access to our archived files. In the future archived files will be kept accessible in our EMAR system so that these files can be accessed via our computers. Monitoring plan record:The residence will provide better direct construction projects to better locate their construction matters as to NOT block staff access to our archived files.(a) The facility will review and mark off areas that will not cause an obstruction to our archived files.(b) Access to these areas be monitored daily during the construction project until completion of the project.(c) This QMP will continue during active construction projects. There are no active construction projects.(d) This action will continue as a monitoring practice within our operations. The construction storage areas will be reviewed as apart of this monitoring during an active construction project. Access will be monitored daily during an active construction project. We will take a log of any construction obstructions on a log during an active construction project. This will be monitored until 1/1/2026. This action will continue as a monitoring practice within our operations.
7/22/2025Licensure Complaint · ID ET0N111 deficiency
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A certification complaint, prompted by #CO38636, was completed on 7/23/25. A deficiency was cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0740PA Req-Cert/DeCert/Term-Decertification
Findings
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide, upon request, copies of the member's records requested by the department affecting 1 former sample member (#4). Findings Include:On 7/22/25 at approximately 12:30 p.m., Member #4's records were requested. On 7/22/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m., the administrator stated that Member #4 records were unavailable because the file room was inaccessible due to construction in the facility's basement.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Former residents #4 historical files were temporary inaccessible because of construction. All active residents files were available. The construction project has been completed, contractors materials/equipment have been removed, and access to resident filesIn the future the files archived will be kept accessible if these files are needed for review. Construction projects will be better directed so that their materials do not obstruct access to our archived files. In the future archived files will be kept accessible in our EMAR system so that these files can be accessed via our computers. Monitoring plan record:The residence will provide better direct construction projects to better locate their construction matters as to NOT block staff access to our archived files.(a) The facility will review and mark off areas that will not cause an obstruction to our archived files.(b) Access to these areas be monitored daily during the construction project until completion of the project.(c) This QMP will continue during active construction projects. There are no active construction projects.(d) This action will continue as a monitoring practice within our operations. The construction storage areas will be reviewed as apart of this monitoring during an active construction project. Access will be monitored daily during an active construction project. We will take a log of any construction obstructions on a log during an active construction project. This will be monitored until 1/1/2026. This action will continue as a monitoring practice within our operations
7/22/2025Revisit: State Certification and State Certification Complaint (Combined) · ID QECS12No deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
A Recertification Survey and Complaint Revisit was completed on 7/23/25 for all previous deficiency cited on 9/3/24. The facility is in compliance with all regulations surveyed.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/3/2024Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID LM2Z12No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A complaint revisit was completed on 9/3/24, for all previous deficiencies cited on 12/14/22 The residence is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. The regulations governing Assisted Living Residences were revised, and the new regulations were implemented on 7/1/24.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/3/2024Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID XWSZ12No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A complaint revisit was completed on 9/3/24, for all previous deficiencies cited on 12/22/24. The facility is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. The regulations governing Alternative Care Facilities were revised and the new regulations were implemented on 11/30/23.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/3/2024State Certification and State Certification Complaint (Combined) · ID QECS111 deficiency
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A recertification survey with complaint #CO36720 was completed on 9/3/24. A deficiency was cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0626Acf-Prov Role/Resp Env Stnds
Findings
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide easily accessible common areas and a physical environment that meets the needs of any participant needing support, affecting four current participants (#1-#4). Findings include:1. ObservationsOn 9/3/24 at 9:30 a.m., the basement of the facility had broken walls, broken windows, broken doors, clutter and broken pieces of wood laying loosely on the floor. The basement was unsafe with the potential of tripping hazards to residents. Additionally, the basement had a strong mildew odor.b. On 9/3/24 at 10:00 a.m., a broken sink filled with stains from chewed tobacco products was observed in Participant #2's room. It emitted an unpleasant odor. 2. Interviewsa. On 9/3/24 at 10:00 a.m., the house manager (HM) said the basement was undergoing reconstruction after a flooding incident had occurred. She confirmed the residents frequently entered the basement to access the washer and dryer. The HM added that the condition of the basement was unsafe and unsanitary.b. On 9/4/24 at 10:05 a.m., the HM stated that she submitted a work order on an unknown date but the work had not been completed by the day of the on-site investigation.c. On 9/3/24 at 10:15 a.m., Resident #3 stated he did his laundry in the basement of the residence. He also said that we wished the basement was safer.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
The basement was under construction when state arrived and was already noted in our maintenance and construction guide. The area was also roped off with construction tape. Resident 2:The resident was continuously spitting his tobacco in the sink and after numerous warnings an order was put in to remove the sink which was 2 days before the inspection. The work order to remove the sink was showed to the inspector while onsiteThe sink has now been removed. The completion of the construction is scheduled for 12/1/2024 but the monitoring will continue until 3/31/2025******************************************What exactly is being done in the basement (construction). The floor was being renovated and is now completed. Please edit your monitoring plan for this deficiency. The monitoring must capture how will residents will be kept safe while construction is underway. (Not after construction has ended). The construction of the floor has been completed. Exactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring;If there is another construction project we will monitor access in these construction areas by temporarily restricting access during construction for the resident's safety. How often the monitoring will occur;We will monitor daily. How the monitoring will be documented;We will monitor in our construction access log daily. The total minimum length of time the monitoring will continue (a minimum of 3 months is required); andThe floor construction project has completedHow the monitoring will be included in the QAPI process. N/A
9/3/2024Revisit: State Certification and State Certification Complaint (Combined) · ID 1DKX13No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A recertification survey and complaint revisit was completed on 9/3/24 for all previous deficiencies cited on 4/4/23. The facility is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. The regulations governing Alternative Care Facilities were revised and the new regulations were implemented on 11/30/23.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/3/2024Revisit: CHOW and Licensure (Re-licensure) and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID KPYF13No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A relicensure survey and complaint revisit was completed on 9/3/24 for all previous deficiencies cited on 4/4/23. The residence is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. The regulations governing Assisted Living Residences were revised, and the new regulations were implemented on 7/1/24.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/3/2024Licensure and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID 5U0C111 deficiency
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A relicensure survey with complaint #CO36719 was completed on 9/3/24. A deficiency was cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
1110Res Care Srvs-Min Srvs Res AgrS/S B
Findings
Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to make available, either directly or indirectly through a resident agreement, a safe and sanitary environment including, but not limited to, measures to reduce the risk of potential hazards in the physical environment, affecting four current residents (#1-#4). Findings include:1. Referencea. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 2.45, defines "Personal services" as those services that an assisted living residence and its staff provide for each resident including, but not limited to:(A) An environment that is sanitary and safe from physical harm."2. ObservationsOn 9/3/24 at 9:30 a.m., the basement of the residence had broken walls, broken windows, broken doors, clutter and broken pieces of wood laying loosely on the floor. The basement was unsafe with the potential of tripping hazards to residents. Additionally, the basement had a strong mildew odor.b. On 9/3/24 at 10:00 a.m., a broken sink filled with stains from chewed tobacco products was observed in Resident #2's room. It emitted an unpleasant odor. 3. Interviewsa. On 9/3/24 at 10:00 a.m., the house manager (HM) said the basement was undergoing reconstruction after a flooding incident had occurred. She confirmed the residents frequently entered the basement to access the washer and dryer. The HM added that the condition of the basement was unsafe and unsanitary.b. On 9/4/24 at 10:05 a.m., the HM stated that she submitted a work order on an unknown date but the work had not been completed by the day of the on-site investigation.c. On 9/3/24 at 10:15 a.m., Resident #3 stated he did his laundry in the basement of the residence. He also said that we wished the basement was safer.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
The basement was under construction when state arrived and was already noted in our maintenance and construction guide. The area was also roped off with construction tape. Resident 2:The resident was continuously spitting his tobacco in the sink and after numerous warnings an order was put in to remove the sink which was 2 days before the inspection. The work order to remove the sink was showed to the inspector while onsite. The sink has now been removed. The completion of the construction is scheduled for 12/1/2024 but the monitoring will continue until 3/31/2025. Addendum:The floor was being renovated and is now completed. The construction of the floor has been completed. If there is another construction project we will monitor access in these construction areas by temporarily restricting access during construction for the resident's safety. We will monitor daily. We will monitor in our construction access log daily.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note
Findings
THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary. The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7, part 9.3.9.3 The assisted living residence shall have an involuntary discharge grievance policy that complies with Section 25-27-104.3, C.R.S., and includes, at a minimum:(A) The individual designated by the assisted living residence to receive involuntary discharge grievances.(B) The ability for any of the persons the assisted living residence is required to notify in accordance with Part 11.16 to file a grievance challenging the involuntary discharge and/or reasons for the discharge with the individual designated in subpart (A), above, within 14 calendar days after written notice of the involuntary discharge is provided by the assisted living residence.(C) The ability for the resident, or other person allowed to file a grievance to receive assistance in preparing and filing a grievance without interference from the assisted living residence.(D) A requirement that grievances related to involuntary discharge be submitted to the individual designated by the facility in accordance with subpart (A) as follows:(1) In writing, or(2) Orally submitted to the individual designated in accordance with subpart (A), above. In the case of an oral submission, the assisted living residence shall ensure the individual submitting the grievance retains proof of the oral submission through a witness or other evidence.(a) If the grievance is orally submitted and witnessed, the assisted living residence shall ensure that the resident or other person filing the grievance has the witness ' s name and contact information, and shall keep that information as part of the grievance documentation.(E) A requirement that no later than 5 business days after the submission of a grievance in accordance with subpart (D), above, the individual designated by the assisted living residence to receive involuntary discharge grievances shall provide a response to the grievance as follows:(1) A written response shall be provided to the individuals required to receive notice in Part 11.16, the state long-term care ombudsman, and the designated local ombudsman.(2) An oral explanation of the written response shall be provided to the resident and/or person filing the grievance, as appropriate.(3) The written response shall include the following statement regarding the filing of an appeal:"If the resident, or other person that submitted this grievance is dissatisfied with this response, they may file an appeal to the executive director of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment within 5 business days after receiving this written response. The appeal must include the original grievance, the original notice of involuntary discharge and supporting documentation given to the resident as part of that notification, and any additional information or documentation."(F) Acknowledgement that if the resident, the individual filing the grievance, or the assisted living residence is dissatisfied with the findings and recommendations of the Department related to an appeal, they may request a hearing conducted by the Department pursuant to Section 24-4-105, C.R.S.(G) A requirement that the assisted living residence not take any punitive or retaliatory action against a resident due to the resident filing a grievance or appeal pursuant to this Part.(H) A requirement that the assisted living residence continue to assist with planning a discharge or transfer of the resident while the grievance or appeal to the Department is pending.(I) A requirement that the resident be allowed to return to the assisted living residence if all of the following apply:(1) The stated reason for the involuntary discharge in the notice of involuntary discharge provided in accordance with Part 11.17 is nonpayment of monthly services or room and board,(2)The assisted living residence discharged the resident on or after the 31st day after the written notice of involuntary discharge was provided to the resident, and(3) The resident substantially complied with payments due to the residence, as determined through the grievance and appeal process.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
4/4/2023Revisit: State Certification and State Certification Complaint (Combined) · ID 1DKX121 deficiency
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A certification revisit was completed on 4/4/23 for the previous deficiency cited on 9/1/22. A deficiency was cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0630Acf-Prov Role/Resp-Svc Req Med admn Pol/PrS/S B
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the facility (residence) failed to comply with written policies and procedures for the administration of medication in accordance with 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter VII, affecting 14 of 14 sample residents (participants) (#1, #3, #6-#17). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure and complaint survey 9/1/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include: Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 14.31, requires the administrator and the QMAP supervisor to, on a quarterly basis, audit the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records, controlled substance list, medication error reports, and medication disposal records. Any irregularities shall be investigated and resolved. The results of the audits shall be documented and routinely included as part of the assisted living residence's Quality Management Program assessment and review. On 4/4/23 at 7:58 a.m., the residence's medication audits were requested from the house manager. The residence's medication audits were not provided. On 4/4/23 at approximately 8:50 a.m., the house manager stated Former Staff #6 had been responsible for the residence's medication audits. She added Former Staff #6 may have taken the audits with her when she left the residence. On 4/4/23 at 11:23 a.m., the house manager stated the operations manager reported to her that the operations manager conducted medication audits at the residence approximately a week prior to the onsite visit. However, she stated the operations manager informed her that the operations manager had put them in a folder Former Resdient #6 had taken. On 4/4/23 at 12:10 p.m., discrepancies arose when Former Staff #6 stated she did not have the residence's medication audits. On 4/4/23 at 1:31 p.m., the administrator stated the residence completed their medication audits; however, he stated Former Staff #6 had taken some of the residence's records. On 4/4/23 at approximately 1:31 p.m., the operations manager stated the medication audits from herself and the administrator had been completed; however, the medication audits were not in the file at the residence.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Staff 6 was a former employee and separated from the company very close to the time of the state surveyor arriving to the ALF. The documents requested were with the documents requested. These documents were removed from the files that were onsite. Staff 6 was a co-med supervisor. We have since appointed and trained a new med supervisor that does audits during the week. The operation manager and/or the admin do the med audits at least monthly. The med audits are documented and logged. We have evidence of these logs onsite. Evidence can also be found in our survey binder. The OM and/or Admin will conduct audits monthly that will include the following checkpoints:Cycle date for this location:_____________________ Any discontinued meds in cart?____________________If so reason?___________________________was it addressed?______ Any expired meds in cart?_______If so reason_____________________________ was it addressed?_______ Any discharged/deceased residents meds in cart?________________ All medications ordered were present?________________________If any missing ,was it addressed?_______________________ Any missing initials from mars?____________ Were prn’s/refusals documented?______________ Any medications needed to be reordered prior to cycle date?____If so for whom and was it resolved?______________________________ Any meds left unattended on med cart?____________________ Name of person completed audit:________________________Title:________________________ Does the mar, order, and medication match?Yes – All currently match Monitoring plan. The OM and Admin will conduct audits monthly that will include the list mentioned above. This will be ongoingExactly how and what will be reviewed as part of the monitoring; We are checking information listed above. Process improvement:We have our med supervisor that conducts her audits weekly. The OM and myself conducts a med audits at least monthly. In the event that we observe discrepancies or med errors are found they are to be addressed, corrected, communicated to management, and included assisted living residence's Quality Management Program assessment and review. The monitoring will be documented in our weekly and monthly med audit which are onsite. The monitoring will be ongoing.
9999Final observationsSurveyor note
Findings
Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
4/4/2023State Certification Complaint · ID 5BBW11No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A certification complaint, prompted by #CO31358 and #CO31360, was completed on 4/4/23. No deficiencies were cited
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
4/4/2023Revisit: CHOW and Licensure (Re-licensure) and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID KPYF127 deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A licensure revisit was completed on 4/4/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/1/22. Deficiencies were cited
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0172LicProc-IntlApp CAPSS/S B
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to show compliance with the Colorado Adult Protective Services Data System (CAPS Check), prior to hiring staff who provided direct care to at-risk residents, affecting three of three sample residents (#1, #3, #6). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure and complaint survey 9/1/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include: 1. References a. According to Colorado Revised Statutes (2017) Title 26 Human Services Code, " ... individuals receiving care and services from persons employed in programs or facilities ... are vulnerable to mistreatment, including abuse, neglect, and exploitation. It is the intent of the general assembly to minimize the potential for employment of persons with a history of mistreatment of at-risk adults in positions that would allow those persons unsupervised access to these adults. As a result, the general assembly finds it necessary to strengthen protections for vulnerable adults by requiring certain employers to request a CAPS check by the state department to determine if a person who will provide direct care to an at-risk adult has been substantiated in a case of mistreatment of an at-risk adult."b. C.R.S. 26-3.1-101 (1.8) reads a "CAPS check" means a check of the Colorado adult protective services data system pursuant to section 26-3.1-111.c. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 2.7, defines an "At-risk person" as any person who is 70 years of age or older, or any person who is 18 years of age or older and meets one or more of the following criteria: (D) Is a person with an intellectual and developmental disability as defined in Section 25.5-10-202, C.R.S.; (E) Is a person with a mental health disorder as defined in Section 27-65-102(11.5), C.R.S.d. Section 27-65-102(11.5), C.R.S defines "Mental health disorder" means one or more substantial disorders of the cognitive, volitional, or emotional processes that grossly impairs judgment or capacity to recognize reality or to control behavior. 2. Record Reviewsa. Personnel Files The residence's personnel file for Staff #4 read she was hired by the residence on 12/10/22. The personnel file for Staff #6 did not contain proof of a request for a CAPS check. The residence's personnel file for Staff #5 read he was hired by the residence on 2/14/23. The personnel file for Staff #5 did not contain proof of a request for a CAPS check. b. Staff SchedulesThe March and April 2023 staff schedules read Staff #4 worked at the residence: 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on 3/4-3/6/23, 3/11-3/13/23, 3/18-3/20/23, 3/25-3/27/23, and 4/1-4/3/23. 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on 3/9-3/10/23, 3/16-3/17/23, 3/23-3/24/23, and 3/30-3/31/23 The March and April 2023 staff schedules read Staff #5 worked at the residence from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. on 3/6-3/10/23, 3/13-3/17/23, 3/20-3/24/23, 3/27-3/31/23, and 4/3/23. b. Review of the face sheets for Residents #1, #3, and #6 revealed the following:Resident #1 had diagnoses of bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #3 had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Resident #6 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. 3. InterviewsOn 4/4/23 at 10:18 a.m., the house manager stated the CAPS check for Staff #5 had not yet been received at the residence. She confirmed Staff #5 had already worked at the residence. On 4/4/23 at 1:53 p.m., the administrator stated he and the operation manager shared the duty of ensuring CAPS check requests were completed for staff members. He stated he knew the residence had completed the CAPS check requests as required; however, they had not been put into the staff files. On 4/1/23 at approximately 1:53 p.m., the operations manager stated it was her responsibility to run CAPS checks for new hires. She stated she was not aware the residence did not have the CAPS check request for Staff #4 in her personnel file at the residence. She confirmed she was aware the residence did not have a CAPS check request onsite at the residence for Staff #5 because the CAPS check request had not been completed for him.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
All employee file are now compliant. All documentation is required for all employees before start date. The OM and admin have audit and provided a checklist for each employee file to ensure all active employee files are compliant. Current files are complete. All employee files must be complete before their start date which include written documentation regarding the following items: (A) A description of the employee or volunteer duties; (B) Date of hire or acceptance of volunteer service and date duties commenced; (C) Orientation and training, including first aid and CPR certification, if applicable; (D) Verification from the Department of Regulatory Agencies, or other state agency, of an active license or certification, if applicable; (E) Results of background checks and follow up, as applicable; and (F) Tuberculin test results, if applicable. Monitoring plan. The OM and Admin will conduct audits monthly that will include the list mentioned above. This will be ongoingWe are checking information listed above. Process improvement: The OM and myself will conduct audits at least monthly. In the event that we observe discrepancies or med errors are found they are to be addressed, corrected, communicated to management, and included assisted living residence's Quality Management Program assessment and review. We will especially review new employee's files moving forward. The monitoring will be documented on our auditing tool. The monitoring will be ongoing.
0246LicProc-IssueLic Cond LicS/S B
Findings
Based on observation, record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with conditions imposed by the department on the license, affecting 14 current residents. Findings include:1. RecordsDepartment records read the residence was currently required to retain a consultant for six months. Following the completion of Event LM2Z11 on 12/14/22, a complaint investigation, the department imposed a consultant for six months to address the cited deficiencies and to also ensure compliance with all other pertinent regulations. The intermediate condition read the consultant was required to complete the following, during the first month of the contract period:- Review each of the cited deficiencies identified in the Deficiency List, for Event LM2Z11 and dated December 14, 2022, with the Administrator, and evaluate the Residence's current compliance with corresponding regulations as outlined in 6 CCR 1011-1 Chapters 2, 7, and 24, where applicable. The consultant was required to complete the following, during the first two months of the contract period:- Evaluate the residence's compliance with the other regulations in Chapters 2, 7, and 24, and provide recommendations to the Administrator on any additional areas of noncompliance. The Consultant would also implement a monitoring program, to be completed at least monthly, to ensure the Residence remains in compliance with previously cited deficiencies. The monitoring program will be incorporated into the Residence's ongoing quality management program (QMP), in accordance with 6 CCR 1011-1 Chapter 2, Section 4. The Consultant will make certain that the QMP was designed to improve resident safety and well-being, and promoted continued quality improvement to enhance service delivery. The consultant was required to complete the following, during the first two months of the contract period:- Conduct onsite visits at least weekly, increasing the frequency as necessary to assist the Residence in maintaining compliance with 6 CCR 1011-1 Chapter 2, Chapter 7, and Chapter 24 and, to prepare the Administrator to independently manage the residence. The consultant was required to complete the following, during the third, fourth and fifth month of the contract period: - Conduct onsite visits at least twice a month, increasing the frequency as necessary to assist the Residence in maintaining compliance with 6 CCR 1011-1 Chapter 2, Chapter 7, and Chapter 24. During these visits, the consultant will provide adequate training, mentoring, and monitoring, and prepare the Administrator to independently manage the Residence. The consultant was required to complete, during the sixth and final month of the contract period: - Prepare the Administrator to independently manage the Facility to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations governing assisted living residences. The Consultant shall make certain that the Administrator has tools and resources in place to maintain compliance. Additionally, the consultant was required to ensure, during the entire six month contract period, for each of the deficiencies identified in the Deficiency List, for Event LM2Z11 and dated December 14, 2022, as well as any other areas of identified deficient practice, that the Administrator had a process in place to correct the identified deficiencies, which included utilizing the above-referenced monitoring program to ensure the deficient practice did not reoccur. The Consultant will make certain that the monitoring identified the scope of review, how a sample was identified for monitoring purposes, the total length of time the monitoring would continue, and how the monitoring would be documented. The consultant was required to submit a final report to the department, following the end of the contract period, that contained the prior information as well as the actions taken to ensure the administrator has tools and resources in place to maintain compliance. Department records read the following deadlines were required for this intermediate condition:- Letter to department to identify possible consultant, due by 3/9/23.- Submit executed consultant contract to the department, due by 3/17/23. - Submit final consultant report, due by 9/15/23. Department records read the residence had communicated on 3/13/23, 3/23/23 and 3/29/23 with the department regarding the intended consultants. On 3/13/23, the administrator had identified a possible consultant; however, the department was unable to approve the consultant. As of the date of the onsite visit, the residence had not yet chosen a consultant. 2. Current deficient practiceDuring the 4/4/23 complaint investigation and revisit, the investigation established there was current deficient practice. Six deficiencies were cited: 540, 664, 1514, 2132, 172, and 1228. (Q0540, Q0664, Q1514, Q2132, B0172, B1228) 3. InterviewsOn 4/4/23 at 2:09 p.m., the administrator stated the residence had been looking for a consultant; however, they were not able to locate one for the area where the residence was located. He stated the residence may have found a consultant but the consultant was not yet confirmed. The administrator stated he was not aware that while under an intermediate condition the residence was expected to not receive additional deficiencies.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
My consultant was not approved and in place until 5/18/223. I worked very closely with program surveyor throughout the process so she is aware. We are currently engaged in the intermediate conditions imposed from the department. A few reports have now been sent and the facility is tracking well on our get well plan. Our consultant is meeting conditions as follows:Evaluate the residence's compliance with the other regulations in Chapters 2, 7, and 24, and provide recommendations to the Administrator on any additional areas of noncompliance. The Consultant would also implement a monitoring program, to be completed at least monthly, to ensure the Residence remains in compliance with previously cited deficiencies. The monitoring program will be incorporated into the Residence's ongoing quality management program (QMP), in accordance with 6 CCR 1011-1 Chapter 2, Section 4. The Consultant will make certain that the QMP was designed to improve resident safety and well-being, and promoted continued quality improvement to enhance service delivery.
0540Admin-Dts RespS/S B
Findings
Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure the administrator complied with all applicable state laws to help prevent the possible development and transmission of coronavirus (COVID-19) and failed to ensure the administrator was responsible for the day-to-day operation of the residence, affecting 14 current residents. Findings include: The Assisted Living Residences and Group Homes Mitigation and Outbreak Guidance, updated 2/22/23, required residences to keep a current COVID-19 ongoing vaccination and treatment plan and for the plan to be presented for review upon request during health facility inspections. On 4/4/23 at 7:58 a.m., the residence's COVID-19 vaccination plan was requested from the house manager. A COVID-19 vaccination plan was provided by the house manager; however, the document was blank. On 4/4/23 at 2:02 p.m., the administrator stated the residence had provided the COVID-19 vaccination plan; however, only a blank one was provided. He added the residence had submitted their COVID-19 vaccination plan to the department. On 4/4/23 at 2:02 p.m., the operations manager stated she was not aware of the residence's COVID-19 vaccination plan.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
I believe the guidance and requirements have been amended and not mandatory reporting is required.
0664Prsnnl-Prsnnl Files RqS/S B
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure personnel files contained all of the elements required, affecting two of three sample staff (#3 and #5). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure and complaint survey 9/1/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include: 1. Record ReviewReview of the residence's personnel files revealed the following: Staff #3's personnel file did not contain a date of hire or orientation and training. Staff #5's personnel file did not include orientation or tuberculin test results. 2. InterviewOn 4/4/23 at 2:05 p.m., the operations manager stated the house manager was responsible for ensuring staff files were updated. Further, she stated the residence was not compliant because there had been water damage to the office where the personnel records had been located. She stated the residence was not compliant due to to being unable to locate the records following the items being removed from the office. On 4/4/23 at approximately 2:05 p.m., the administrator stated the residence was going through documents, such as the staff files, and performing audits to follow up on noncompliance.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
All employee files are now compliant. All documentation is required for all employees before start date. The OM and admin have audit and provided a checklist for each employee file to ensure all active employee files are compliant. Current files are complete. All employee files must be complete before their start date which include written documentation regarding the following items: (A) A description of the employee or volunteer duties; (B) Date of hire or acceptance of volunteer service and date duties commenced; (C) Orientation and training, including first aid and CPR certification, if applicable; (D) Verification from the Department of Regulatory Agencies, or other state agency, of an active license or certification, if applicable; (E) Results of background checks and follow up, as applicable; and (F) Tuberculin test results, if applicable. This requirement and monitoring is ongoing.
1228FluImmuEmp/Con-GenProv 90 percent vacc-DocsS/S B
Findings
Based on record review and interviews, the residence failed to maintain proof of staff's influenza immunization or medical exemption, affecting 14 current residents. This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure and complaint survey 9/1/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include:1. References and Residence Policy Chapter II regulations governing assisted living residences, part 1.31, defines "influenza season" as November 1 through March 31 of the following year, or as otherwise defined by the Division of Disease Control and Public Health Response within the Department. Chapter II regulations governing assisted living residence, part 1.51, defines "Proof of immunization" as an electronic entry in the Colorado Immunization Information System (CIIS) or an immunization record from a licensed healthcare provider who has administered an influenza vaccine to an individual who provides services for the facility or agency, specifying the vaccine administered, name and title of the person who administered the vaccine, address of the location where the vaccine was administered, and the date it was administered. The residence's undated Infection Control policy read in part: "During flu season staff will be required to obtain a flu vaccine or will have to bring in a doctor note stating why they cannot receive a flu vaccine. This will be kept on file in the employees record for three (3) years, which will be maintained on site at all times."2. Record Review Review of the residence's personnel file for Staff #5 revealed it did not contain documentation of influenza vaccination or medical exemption for the 11/1/22-3/31/23 influenza season. On 4/4/23 at 10:59 a.m., Staff #5's documentation of influenza vaccination or a medical exemption was requested from the house manager. She was unable to provide the documentation. The March and April 2023 staff schedules read Staff #5 worked at the residence from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. on 3/6-3/10/23, 3/13-3/17/23, 3/20-3/24/23, 3/27-3/31/23, and 4/3/23. 3. Interviews On 4/4/23 at 2:00 p.m., the operations manager stated she was unaware why Staff #5's influenza vaccination was not in his file. She stated at the time of hire, Staff #5 reported he had been vaccinated. On 4/4/23 at 2:00 p.m., the administrator stated he expected staff to have proof of influenza vaccination or medical exemption documentation. The administrator was unable to answer why the residence was not compliant after the residence had been cited for the deficiency on a previous visit.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
All employee fileS are now compliant. All documentation is required for all employees before start date. The OM and admin have audit and provided a checklist for each employee file to ensure all active employee files are compliant. Current files are complete. All employee files must be complete before their start date which including the ability to demonstrate that the ninety percent (90%) rate has been meet, facilities and agencies shall: (C) Maintain for three (3) years the following documentation that may be examined by the Department in a random audit process: (1) Proof of immunization, as defined at Part 1.46 of this Chapter, or (2) A medical exemption signed by a physician, physician assistant, advanced practice nurse, or certified nurse midwife licensed in the State of Colorado stating that the influenza vaccination for the employee or direct contractor is medically contraindicated as described in the product labeling approved by the FDA.
1514Med/Med Adm-Rcrd Kpng Qrtly AuditS/S B
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure the administrator and a qualified medication administration person (QMAP) conducted quarterly audits of medication administration records, controlled substance list, medication error reports, and medication disposal records, affecting 14 of 14 current residents (#1, #3, #6-#17) who were administered medications. This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure and complaint survey 9/1/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include: On 4/4/23 at 7:58 a.m., the residence's medication audits were requested from the house manager. The residence's medication audits were not provided. On 4/4/23 at approximately 8:50 a.m., the house manager stated Former Staff #6 had been responsible for the residence's medication audits. She added Former Staff #6 may have taken the audits with her when she left the residence. On 4/4/23 at 11:23 a.m., the house manager stated the operations manager reported to her that the operations manager conducted medication audits at the residence approximately a week prior to the onsite visit. However, she stated the operations manager informed her that the operations manager had put them in a folder Former Resdient #6 had taken. On 4/4/23 at 12:10 p.m., discrepancies arose when Former Staff #6 stated she did not have the residence's medication audits. On 4/4/23 at 1:31 p.m., the administrator stated the residence completed their medication audits; however, he stated Former Staff #6 had taken some of the residence's records. On 4/4/23 at approximately 1:31 p.m., the operations manager stated the medication audits from herself and the administrator had been completed; however, the medication audits were not in the file at the residence.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Staff 6 was a former employee and separated from the company very close to the time of the state surveyor arriving to the ALF. The documents requested were with the documents requested. These documents were removed from the files that were onsite. Staff 6 was a co-med supervisor. We have since appointed and trained a new med supervisor that does audits during the week. The operation manager and/or the admin do the med audits at least monthly. The med audits are documented and logged. We have evidence of these logs onsite. Evidence can also be found in our survey binder. The OM and/or Admin will conduct audits monthly that will include the following checkpoints:Cycle date for this location:_____________________ Any discontinued meds in cart?____________________If so reason?___________________________was it addressed?______ Any expired meds in cart?_______If so reason_____________________________ was it addressed?_______ Any discharged/deceased residents meds in cart?________________ All medications ordered were present?________________________If any missing ,was it addressed?_______________________ Any missing initials from mars?____________ Were prn’s/refusals documented?______________ Any medications needed to be reordered prior to cycle date?____If so for whom and was it resolved?______________________________ Any meds left unattended on med cart?____________________ Name of person completed audit:________________________Title:________________________ Does the mar, order, and medication match?Yes – All currently match Monitoring plan. The OM and Admin will conduct audits monthly that will include the list mentioned above. This will be ongoing. We are checking information listed above. Process improvement:We have our med supervisor that conducts her audits weekly. The OM and myself conducts a med audits at least monthly. In the event that we observe discrepancies or med errors are found they are to be addressed, corrected, communicated to management, and included assisted living residence's Quality Management Program assessment and review. The monitoring will be documented in our weekly and monthly med audit which are onsite. The monitoring will be ongoing.
2132HIR-Cntnt AnnllyS/S B
Findings
Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure face sheets contained required information affecting three of three sample residents (#1, #3, #6) and one former resident (#18). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure and complaint survey 9/1/22. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include:Review of face sheets in resident records revealed the following items were missing: Resident #1: case manager information Resident #3: religious preference and case manager information Resident #6: religious preference and case manager information Former Resident #18: religious preference, language spoken, and case manager information On 4/4/23 at 2:03 p.m., the operations manager stated she and the house manager were responsible for ensuring face sheets had all of the required information. She stated the face sheets should have been updated to include language and religion but stated case manager information may not have been updated on face sheets. On 4/4/23 at approximately 2:03 p.m., the administrator stated face sheets should have been updated to include all required information.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
All resident's face sheets are now compliant. All items required to be included on the Face sheet have now been added including:(A) Resident's full name, including maiden name, if applicable; (B) Resident's sex, date of birth, and marital status; (C) Resident's most recent former address; (D) Resident's medical insurance information and Medicaid number, if applicable; (E) Date of admission and readmission, if applicable; (F) Name, address and contact information for family members, legal representatives, and/or other persons to be notified in case of emergency; (G) Name, address, and contact information for resident's practitioner and case manager, if applicable; (H) Resident's primary spoken language and any issues with oral communication; (I) Indication of resident's religious preference, if any; (J) Resident's current diagnoses; and (K) Notation of resident's allergies, if any. The OM and admin have audited and provided a checklist for each resident's face sheet to ensure all active residents face sheet are compliant. The admin has provided an auditing tool to verify and checkoff each component to be included on the face sheet. Monitoring plan. The OM and Admin will conduct audits monthly that will include the list mentioned above. This will be ongoingWe are checking information listed above. Process improvement:The OM and myself will conduct audits at least monthly. In the event that we observe discrepancies or med errors are found they are to be addressed, corrected, communicated to management, and included assisted living residence's Quality Management Program assessment and review. We will especially review new resident files moving forward. The monitoring will be documented on our auditing tool. The monitoring will be ongoing.
9999Final ObservationsSurveyor note
Findings
Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
4/4/2023Licensure Complaint · ID Q2QJ11No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO31357 and #CO31359, was completed on 4/4/23. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.

Reportable Occurrences

2 records
8/23/2023Sexual Abuse · ID 23230662002Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 8/23/23, three male residents (A, B, and C) alleged another male resident (D) touched their buttock area without consent. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police, families, ombudsman and physician. Residents (A), (B), and (C) all stated they felt safe and refused an assessment. Resident (D) admitted to the incident. The facility investigation substantiated an allegation of inappropriate touching. Management issued a discharge notice to resident (D) and staff assisted him to look for an alternate placement. Resident (D) was seen by his physician for any medication adjustments. Staff have been made aware of the actions to be taken to monitor resident (D)’s behavior until he moved out. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence section of the Department. The provider reports the information submitted to the Department is accurate and complete. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed by the State Agency. The occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe. The facility/agency complied with licensing standards for conducting an internal investigation of this occurrence event and submitting a report of the findings to the Department.
Publication
Sent to facility 7/25/2024 · released to the public 8/1/2024.
3/8/2023Physical Abuse · ID 23230662001Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 3/7/22 a female resident (A) in her 40s physically assaulted staff members. The police were called a few times and stated they could not remove resident (A) from the facility. The facility contacted the crisis center who also did not remove resident (A) from the facility. During this time, a male resident (B) in his 50s came forward to report that resident (A) had placed her hands around his neck and told him to move. This happened two days prior. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police, Adult Protective Services and ombudsman. The police had been called a number of times to the facility as staff had to barricade themselves because of being physically assaulted by resident (A). It was revealed that other residents were fearful of resident (A) and did not come forward to report and were being bullied. Resident (A) denied the allegations even though there were several witnesses. Resident (A) reportedly fled the facility and had not returned. The facility investigation concluded resident (A) is a threat to herself and others, and a restraining order was implemented. To help prevent a recurrence all staff and other residents have been notified of the restraining order in place and to notify management if resident (A) is near the facility. A meeting was held with the remaining residents to ensure they felt safe and were encouraged to report safety concerns to staff as needed for support DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 10/5/2023 · released to the public 10/12/2023.