6
Inspections
5
Deficiencies
0
Actual Harm or Above
5
Occurrences
May 11, 2026
Last Inspection
S/S A/B Minimal potential
The most recent inspection of RIVARIA VISTA GRANDE on record is dated May 11, 2026. Across 6 published inspections, state surveyors cited 5 deficiencies, none of which reached the actual-harm level.
Colorado publishes inspections on a rolling window, so older surveys may no longer appear. Citation codes 0000 and 9999 are the surveyor's opening and closing comments, not deficiencies, and are excluded from the counts above. Where the state required one, the facility's own plan of correction is shown beneath the finding it answers.
Provider Information
Status
Active
Facility Type
Assisted Living Residence (Licensed Only)
Administrator
Gamet, Patricia
Owner
VOP VISTA GRANDE, LLC
Phone
(719) 598-0400
Payor Source
Private Pay
City
COLORADO SPRINGS
ZIP
80918
Inspections & Citations
6 inspections · 5 deficiencies5/11/2026Licensure Complaint · ID C9QS11No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38749, was completed 5/12/26. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
4/9/2026Licensure (Re-licensure) · ID 9DQ511No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
An administrative relicensure survey was completed on 4/9/26. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
2/3/2025Revisit: Licensure and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID POJW12No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A revisit survey was completed on 2/3/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/25/24. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/24/2024Revisit: Licensure Complaint · ID 0HSR12No deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A complaint revisit was completed on 9/25/24 for all previous deficiencies/the previous deficiency cited on 1/12/23. The residence setting is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. The regulations governing Assisted Living Residences were revised, and the new regulations were implemented on 7/1/24.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/24/2024Licensure and Licensure Complaint (Combined) · ID POJW113 deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A relicensure survey with complaint #CO34912, #CO34516, #CO34191, #CO34052, #CO32747, and #CO31775 was completed on 9/25/24. Deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0732Stf Req-First Aid 1 Stf Onsite CrtfdS/S B▼
Findings
Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure that there was at least one staff member onsite at all times certified in first aid, affecting 40 current residents. (Cross-reference S0734) Findings include:On 9/25/24 at 7:30 a.m., first aid certification for all staff was requested from the administrator. On 9/25/24 at 11:00 a.m., the certifications were provided. However, the first aid certifications revealed Staff #1-#9 did not have current certification from a nationally recognized organization. The September 2024 staff schedule revealed the following shifts did not have at least one person certified in first aid as follows:6:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. shift on 9/6, 9/7, 9/17, and 9/18/24.2:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m. shift on 9/2-9/4, 9/9-9/11, 9/14, 9/17, 9/18, and 9/23-9/25/24.10:00 p.m.- 6:00 a.m. shift from 9/1-9/25/24. On 9/25/24 at 12:00 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware each staff member's first aid certification was not obtained from a nationally recognized organization. She stated the residence was providing a CPR/First Aid certification course for residence staff on 9/26/24, and had she known the above staff did not have a valid first aid certification, she would have provided the course sooner.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
POC: (Cross-reference S0734)Re-education was provided to the Executive Director and scheduling coordinator on 9/25/24 regarding the regulation 8.6 that states “Each assisted living residence shall have at least one staff member onsite at all times who has current certification in first aid from a nationally recognized organization such as the American Red Cross, the American Heart Association, National Safety Council, or American Safety and Health Institute. The certification shall either be in Adult First Aid or include Adult First Aid.” This education was documented on an in-service form with signatures of everyone in attendance. A First Aid class was held on 9/26/24 and 10/1/24 to certify staff in first aid that so there is a staff member onsite at all times who has current certification in first aid. To monitor for ongoing compliance, for a period of 3 months, the Executive Director or designee will perform audits of the schedule to check that there is a staff member onsite at all times who has current certification in first aid. This monitoring will be documented on an audit sheet which will be added to the community’s QAPI process.
0734Stf Req-First Aid 1 Stf Onsite CPRS/S B▼
Findings
Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure that there was at least one staff member onsite at all times certified in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), affecting 40 current residents. (Cross-reference S0732)Findings include: On 9/25/24 at 7:30 a.m., CPR certification for all staff was requested from the administrator. On 9/25/24 at 11:00 a.m., the certifications were provided. However, the CPR certifications revealed Staff #1-#9 did not have current certification from a nationally recognized organization. The September 2024 staff schedule revealed the following shifts did not have at least one person certified in CPR as follows:6:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m. shift on 9/6, 9/7, 9/17, and 9/18/24.2:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m. shift on 9/2-9/4, 9/9-9/11, 9/14, 9/17, 9/18, and 9/23-9/25/24.10:00 p.m.- 6:00 a.m. shift from 9/1-9/25/24. On 9/25/24 at 12:00 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware each staff member's CPR certification was not obtained from a nationally recognized organization. She stated the residence was providing a CPR/First Aid certification course for residence staff on 9/26/24, and had she known the above staff did not have a valid CPR certification, she would have provided the course sooner.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
(Cross-reference S0732)Re-education was provided to the Executive Director and scheduling coordinator on 9/25/24 regarding the regulation 8.6 that states “Each assisted living residence shall have at least one staff member onsite at all times who has current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and obstructed airway techniques from a nationally recognized organization (e.g., the American Red Cross, the American Heart Association, the National Safety Council or the American Safety and Health Institute) or a training curriculum that meets the American Heart Association's Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) or International Consensus on Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation (ILCOR) guidelines. The certification shall either be in Adult CPR or include Adult CPR in its curriculum and shall include a skills assessment observed and evaluated by an instructor.” This education was documented on an in-service form with signatures of everyone in attendance. A CPR class was held on 9/26/24 and 10/1/24 to certify staff in CPR so that there is a staff member onsite at all times who has current certification in CPR.To monitor for ongoing compliance, for a period of 3 months, the Executive Director or designee will perform audits of the schedule to check that there is a staff member onsite at all times who has current certification in CPR. This monitoring will be documented on an audit sheet which will be added to the community’s QAPI process.
1352Res Rghts Rts/Rspn-Choice/Invlv Cr/Svc-CommS/S B▼
Findings
Based on interview, and record review, the residence failed to cooperation with residents to achieve maximum degree of benefits from services provided by the residence which include responding timely to call lights, affecting four current residents (15, #18, #19, #22). Findings include:1. Record reviewOn 9/24/24 at 8:20 a.m., call light logs for the months of July 2024 to September 2024 were requested. A review of the provided call light logs revealed late response times by staff which resulted in several incidents where residents who required urgent assistance were left unattended. Examples include:On 9/8/24, Resident #15 called for assistance at 7:33 p.m., staff responded after one hour, 24 minutes and 20 seconds. On 9/22/24, Resident #18 called for assistance at 9:46 p.m., staff responded after one hour, 10 minutes and 49 seconds. On 9/8/24, Resident #21 called for assistance at 3:12 p.m., staff responded after one hour, four minutes and 47 seconds. On 9/8/24, Resident #21 called for assistance at 6:03 a.m., staff responded after 52 minutes and 58 seconds. On 9/8/24, Resident #15 called for assistance at 10:19 a.m., staff responded after 41 minutes and 45 seconds. On 9/4/24, Resident #18 called for assistance at 2:39 p.m., staff responded after 35 minutes and 34 seconds. On 8/27/24, Resident #18 called for assistance at 3:57 p.m., staff responded after 33 minutes and 14 seconds. On 9/7/24, Resident #19 called for assistance at 4:57 a.m., staff responded after 31 minutes, 22 seconds. 2. InterviewOn 9/24/24 at 1:40 p.m., Resident #15 said he sat in bed in his own feces for over 40 minutes because staff did not respond in time to assist him to the bathroom. On 9/24/24 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #21 said the average response time to call lights by staff was 10 to 15 minutes but he was left sitting in the bathroom for more than one hour. He added he did not have his cell phone in the bathroom to notify other staff for help. On 9/24/24 at 1:20 p.m., Resident #18 stated, "I do not like their (staff) response time. I do not know if they take very long or if I am impatient. Sometimes they leave me on the commode for a long time. This morning, I wanted a shower and I was in the bathroom for so long."On 9/24/24 at 1:30 p.m., Resident #19 said there were times when she had received prompt responses, she also said at other times, it took so long before staff would respond. On 9/24/25 at 3:18 p.m., the residential care coordinator confirmed the late response times by staff to calls for assistance by residents. She also said some pendants were old and did not function properly. On 9/24/25 at 3:30 p.m., Staff #2 confirmed there were incidents of staff late responses to the residents' call lights. She also said staff did their best to ensure prompt responses to the residents' calls for assistance but on busy days, response time could be longer. On 9/24/24 at 3:30 p.m., Staff #6 confirmed there were incidents of staff late responses to the residents' call lights. She acknowledged the situation as a challenge because staff was overwhelmed with calls on some days.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
On 9/26/24, the Executive Director and Leadership Team were re-educated on resident rights and the policies and systems to respond to resident calls and requests in a manner to achieve maximum degree of benefits from services provided to residents. This education was documented on an in-service form with signatures of everyone in attendance. The issue of call light response times for residents 15, 18, 19, and 22 have been addressed with staff and is currently resolved. The Executive Director and Health and Wellness Director will provide re-education to staff by 11/9/24 on using pagers and walkie-talkies to communicate and coordinate care, and if an associate is unable to respond timely, how he or she should request assistance from another associate. This education was documented on an in-service form with signatures of everyone in attendance. The Executive Director or designee will review call light time responses and investigate and address concerns. To monitor for ongoing compliance, for a period of 3 months, audits will be performed of call light response times twice weekly for one month, then once a week thereafter for 3 months. These audits will be documented on a spreadsheet and will added to the QAPI process and reviewed quarterly.
1/11/2023Licensure Complaint · ID 0HSR112 deficiencies▼
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note▼
Findings
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO28553, #CO29070 and #CO30500 was completed on 1/12/23. Deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
1160Res Care Srvs-Care CoordS/S A▼
Findings
Based on observation, interview and record review, the residence failed to be responsible for the coordination of resident care services with known external service providers, affecting one of six sample residents (#3). Findings include:1. Residence Policiesa. The residence's undated handbook read in part; "Transportation. Most communities offer scheduled transportation to stores and doctor appointments within a designated service area. We can help make arrangements if you need transportation outside of our regular schedule or service area."b. The residence's Transportation policy, dated August 2022, read in part; "Associates will assist residents to maintain their community involvement and to meet scheduled appointments as needed. Families and/or responsible party are the first transportation resource. Public transportation options are next. The assisted living community's vehicle should be the last choice."2. Resident #3 was admitted to the residence on 12/30/16.a. ObservationOn 1/11 and 1/12/23, Resident #3 was absent from the residence, due to a hospitalization.b. Record ReviewJanuary 2023 progress notes for Resident #3 read, in part:On 1/4/23, Resident #3 was transferred to the hospital for nausea, vomiting and loose stool. On 1/4/23, Resident #3 returned to the residence and was diagnosed with acute urinary retention and a catheter was placed. On 1/9/23, Resident #3's catheter bag was cloudy with sediment thick secretions. Resident #3 was transported to the hospital for evaluation. A hospital summary note, dated 1/4/23, for Resident #3 read, in part, "It would seem your symptoms today are related to urinary retention. Your bladder was extremely full and distended which can be quite uncomfortable. There was no evidence of infection when we changed your urine ... Maintain the Foley catheter that is in place until follow-up over the next 2-4 days with urology. Your facility or yourself can call the office of (Practitioner) at the number provided in this packet for a clinic visit to remove the Foley catheter and try to urinate without it ... Diagnoses: Lower abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting ... acute urinary retention."c. InterviewsOn 1/12/23 at 12:37 p.m., a family member of Resident #3 stated the health and wellness director (HWD) was supposed to schedule an appointment for Resident #3 to see the urologist after her recent hospitalization on 1/4/23. She stated the follow up appointment was not scheduled because the residence bus was not working and the residence had no transportation. On 1/12/23 at approximately 1:00 p.m., the HWD stated when Resident #3 was at the hospital on 1/4/23 she had a catheter placed and the residence was trying to schedule a follow-up urologist appointment. She added the appointment could not be scheduled until the residence transportation issues could be sorted out. On 1/12/23 at 2:00 p.m., the district director of clinical services (DDCS) stated he expected the HWD to follow up with a resident's family member to schedule an appointment if a follow up appointment was required. On 1/12/23 at 2:00 p.m., the administrator stated she expected the HWD to follow up and collaborate with the family to schedule an appointment. She added, "Overall there should be improved communication between (the residence nurses) ... Check in on residents. Communicating with family. Coordinating care is important."
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Resident Care Services – Care Coordination Plan of Correction:The statements made on this plan of corrections are not an admission to and do not constitute an agreement with the alleged deficiencies herein. To remain in compliance with all Federal and State regulations, the community has taken or will take the actions set forth in the following plan of correction. In response to citation tag Q1160 Resident Care Services – Care Coordination 12.11. The assisted living residence will comply with holding responsibility for the coordination of resident care services with known external service providers. The Business Office Coordinator provided all residents and their families with Brookdale’s transportation policy, local transportation resources, and how to coordinate transportation with Brookdale. In addition, the transportation binder that residents utilize to seek transportation was updated and all associates will be re-educated on the policy. Lastly, Vista Grande received a new ADA compliant bus specifically for this site and has an associate dedicated to provide transportation as needed. To ensure coordination of resident care services with external service providers associates have been instructed to bring any transportation requests / appointments details to the daily morning meeting to coordinate resident needs. The Health and Wellness Director and Health and Wellness Coordinator will be conducting a formal in-service training with all clinical associates to review the policy and procedural guidelines regarding care coordination / transportation and their signatures will be noted indicating training completion. To monitor for compliance, beginning January 2023, care coordination will be reviewed in Collaborative Care Review meetings, daily morning meetings, QAPI meetings, and during care conferences with residents and their families. Monitoring will be documented in meeting minutes for the above mentioned meetings for a minimum of 90 days.
1468Med/Med Adm-Ordrs Cmpy w/OrdrsS/S A▼
Findings
Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to be responsible for complying with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration except for those medications which a resident self administers, affecting one of four sample residents (#2). Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence's Medication and Treatments policy, dated August 2022, read in part; "The community is responsible for obtaining newly ordered medication or refills for mediation and treatment orders ... Trained and/or licensed associates may administer or assist the resident with medication management or medication administration and treatments per physician/health care provider order and as per state regulation."2. Resident #2 was admitted to the residence on 6/8/34.a. LorazepamA written practitioner's order, dated 11/21/22, read to discontinue lorazepam oral concentrate 2 mg/ml three times daily. However, the December 2022 and January 2023 electronic medication administration record (eMAR) for Resident #2 read the medication was still administered on 12/23-12/24/22 8:00 p.m. dose, 12/28/22 8:00 a.m. dose, 12/30/22 8:00 p.m. dose, 1/6/23 8:00 p.m. dose and 1/7/23 8:00 a.m. dose, for a total of six additional doses administered. On 1/12/23 at 1:23 p.m., the health and wellness director (HWD) acknowledged the lorazepam was discontinued and should not have been administered. b. ProtonixA written practitioner's order, dated 11/21/22, read to discontinue protonix 40 mg once daily. However, the December 2022 and January 2023 eMAR for Resident #2 read the medication was administered on 12/19/22, 1/9/23 and 1/11/23, for a total of three additional doses. On 1/12/23 at 2:16 p.m., the HWD acknowledged the protonix should have been discontinued in November 2022. 3. InterviewsOn 1/12/23 at approximately 1:00 p.m., the HWD stated the checked boxes on the eMAR's indicated the medications were administered. On 1/12/23 at 2:00 p.m., the district director of clinical services stated multiple orders were sent from an external service provider over the weekend on 12/11/22. On 1/12/23 at 2:00 p.m., the administrator stated she expected the residence to administer or discontinue residents medications, as ordered.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Medication and Medication Administration Plan of CorrectionThe statements made on this plan of corrections are not an admission to and do not constitute an agreement with the alleged deficiencies herein. To remain in compliance with all Federal and State regulations, the community has taken or will take the actions set forth in the following plan of correction. In response to citation tag Q1468 Medication and Medication Administration – Orders 14.21. The assisted living residence will comply with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration except for those medications which a resident self-administers. A Medication Cart audit was conducted and completed by the Resident Care Coordinator and reviewed by the Health and Wellness Coordinator on 1.12.2022. It is confirmed that resident #2 and all other residents have availability of all of their medications, from their chosen pharmacy. In addition, all medications have been discontinued where appropriate. The Health and Wellness Coordinator reviewed, covering the Medication Administration Policy, and the correct way to order medications with all QMAP associates. All QMAPS were instructed that medication must be ordered when there is only a 7 day supply left and to check the pharmacy fax machine after ordering medications to verify there is no complication with the order or script. Staff have been re-educated on calling the pharmacy to follow up on medications that have been ordered, but not yet received by the community within in a 24 hour period from the date ordered. The Health and Wellness Director, or designee, will be conducting a formal in-service training with all clinical associates and nothing their signature of training completion. To monitor for compliance, beginning January 2023, medication cart audits will be conducted and documented weekly for a period of 90 days and re-assessed at that point. The Health and Wellness Director or designee will run a report to review for any missed medications once per week for a period of 90 days. This metric will be reviewed monthly during a Safety Committee Meeting for a period of 90 days and re-assessed at that point.
Reportable Occurrences
5 records12/16/2023Misappropriation of Property · ID 2323053C005Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 12/16/23, a family member of a male resident (A) in his 60s reported resident (A)'s wallet was left in his pants that were taken to be laundered. The family member reported resident (A)’s wallet was returned missing $250.00 that was in there before his pants were washed. On 12/18/23, another family member said they gave resident (A) $200 and placed it in a white envelope in his drawer last week and that money was also missing. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police, family, and Adult Protective Services. The family is not accusing any specific caregiver. Caregiver (1) was assigned to resident (A) on 12/15/23. The caregiver confirmed the resident's laundry was completed but did not see a wallet. Additional caregivers involved with helping resident (A) said they did not see his wallet either. With the resident's permission, a search was conducted for the missing money and none of the mentioned money was found. The facility investigation was unable to identify the location of the missing money or potential assailant. To help prevent a recurrence, resident (A) was educated to keep his valuables in a secure place at all times and to lock his door as an added barrier. The family members were encouraged to add a security camera to his room and consider giving the resident smaller amounts of cash to keep in his possession. Staff were reminded of laundry procedures when personal items are found and to reporting any suspicious activity.
DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
12/13/2023Verbal Abuse · ID 2323053C004Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:
On 12/13/23, Resident A in her 80’s reported to Staff #2, that Staff #1 was verbally abusive, antagonistic, rough and was possibly trying to hurt her and other residents. Resident A also stated Staff #1 was impatient, argumentative and refused to care for her and other residents, and felt unsafe in his/her care. Resident B in her 80’s reported to Staff #3 that Staff #1 was argumentative, refused to provide care, had yelled at her and was not honoring her rights. Resident B described an incident with Staff #1 that left her tearful and emotionally distraught. Two additional residents voiced concerns regarding Staff #1: Resident C in his 80’s and Resident D in her 90’s. The interactions with Staff #1 made Resident D feel bad and to not want to use her pendant to summon assistance.
FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION:
The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police, family/guardians and adult protective services. Staff #1 was suspended and all four residents were assessed by staff #4 and #5. Resident A stated she never wanted Staff #1 to care for her again. She said s/he acted pleasant and caring when others were around, but described that as a front. When alone with her, Staff #1 was hostile and refused to help her with her needs. Staff #1 yelled at her and purposely tried to injure her ulcerated feet by slamming her feet into the couch or bed on multiple occasions. Resident A told Staff #1 that the rough treatment was hurtful. Resident A stated Staff #1 also rushed her to move, despite the resident telling her s/he was hurting her. Resident A stated staff #1 often lied and left trash on the floor that she could easily trip over which made her nervous. Resident A stated she was fearful of divulging these concerns about staff #1. Resident B stated that Staff #1 argued with her no matter what she asked him/her to do. She stated that Staff #1 had told her she was not being nice to the people who were trying to help her, was sweet to other residents, but not to her. Resident B stated that Staff #1 had yelled at her and directed her to go to the bathroom in her pants because s/he did not want to assist her. The resident stated she had to ask someone else to help her because she did not feel she should be yelled at or not allowed to use the toilet. Resident B stated she believed Staff #1 was taking her rights from her. Staff #3 stated s/he had recalled an incident when Resident B had called for assistance and Staff #1 had responded. Resident B wanted to be taken to the restroom, but Staff #1 insisted she go to the bathroom in her pants. Resident B got upset with Staff #1, so Staff #1 radioed for Staff #3 for help. When Staff #3 arrived, Staff #1 stated “You (expletive) deal with this (expletive)” and stormed out of the room, which caused Resident B to cry. Since this incident, Staff #1 had not answered the resident’s calls for assistance. Staff #3 stated that Staff #1 always wore earbuds and during phone conversations while working, s/he used profanity and inappropriate language, even when pushing a resident in a wheelchair, completing care or when in public areas where residents could overhear. Resident C stated that Staff #1 refused to use a gait belt when s/he transferred him, on two or three occasions, despite his reminders and was nearly dropped. Resident C stated Staff #1 was constantly on the phone, wearing earbuds and talking to someone else while caring for him. Resident D stated Staff #1 was rude when showering her, by not listening to her when she told her what she needed. Resident D stated Staff #1 consistently stated how tired s/he was, which made her feel bad and to not want to use her pendant to summon assistance. Staff #1 denied s/he had used profanity to or around residents, was neglectful or had refused to provide care. Staff #1 stated s/he did his/her job well at all times. From the investigation, the facility terminated Staff #1's employment. To help prevent a recurrence, the facility leadership retrained all of its associates on reporting requirements, elder abuse, neglect and policies and procedures.
DEPARTMENT FINDINGS:
In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed.
The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 1/22/2024 · released to the public 1/22/2024.
11/16/2023Misappropriation of Property · ID 2323053C003Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:
On 11/16/23, a director of an independent living (IL) came to the facility to visit with Resident A in her 80’s. The resident used to reside in that community. During the visit, the director told Resident A she needed to move back to the independent living. The director proceeded to type up a 30-day discharge notice for this facility and had her sign it. The director also asked for her checkbook saying she owed money to the independent living. Allegedly, the director wrote out a check for the amount owed and directed Resident A to sign it. The resident reported she was unsure of what she signed in the director's presence. In addition, there was a report of another provider from the same community showing up and trying to get the resident to sign up for home care services associated with the IL community. Upon being notified of these actions, an investigation of financial exploitation and misappropriation of property was started for the resident, who was identified as an at-risk adult.
FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION:
The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police, family/guardian, physician and adult protective services. Attempts were made to speak to the director on multiple occasions, but the calls were not returned. The resident’s physician told the IL director that Resident A was not appropriate for an independent living situation. The facility staff were directed to monitor the visitors coming to see Resident A and to alert the administrator if visitors arrived. The facility was working with the resident, social workers, physician and the resident’s family member to secure a power of attorney or guardian, due to the resident’s mental status. Resident A stated a man came to her room and told her to sign multiple items, but she did not know what she signed. Resident A’s family member gained access to her financial documents and discovered multiple checks were written, not in Resident A’s handwriting, for services she was not receiving previously at the IL. The total amount of checks were approximately $32,000. Additionally, a car belonging to Resident A was no longer on the premises when the family member of Resident A went to the IL to retrieve it. From the investigation, the facility substantiated Resident A’s property had been misappropriated and were waiting to determine if a legal authority could be established for Resident A to prevent a future occurrence. The family member became more involved to assist with plans to ensure the safety of Resident A. The local police were aware of the allegations and investigating the missing money and car.
DEPARTMENT FINDINGS:
In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed.
The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 1/19/2024 · released to the public 1/19/2024.
4/29/2023Missing Person · ID 2323053C002Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:
On 4/29/23 the facility received a call from a local restaurant stating that they had a patron at their site that lived at the facility. The resident was a female resident (A) in her 70s who at the restaurant and the facility was unaware she had left.
FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION:
The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the physician, and families/guardians. The facility contacted resident (A)’s family and they went to pick her up from the local restaurant. Resident (A) had been gone for eight hours. Resident (A) has a diagnosis of dementia. Resident (A) was doing well when she returned to the facility and hourly checks were implemented. The facility investigation concluded resident (A) left the facility without letting anyone know. No previous elopement was indicated. To help prevent a recurrence the staff were provided with education again on the sign in and out process and to ensure the proper checklists were used. Resident (A) was provided with one-to-one staff until she is moved to a memory care as discussed with family.
DEPARTMENT FINDINGS:
In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed.
The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 9/25/2023 · released to the public 9/25/2023.
3/29/2023Sexual Abuse · ID 2323053C001Reported on time: Yes▼
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:
On 03/29/23 female resident (B) reported male resident (A) had inappropriately touched her. Resident (B) said resident (A) had done the same thing to female residents (C) and (D). Residents (A) and (B) were in their 80s. Resident (A) had some cognitive impairment.
FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION:
The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police and families/guardians. Resident (C), in her 70s, had significant cognitive decline. She was out of the facility at the time this was reported and could not be interviewed. Resident (C)'s seat in the dining room was to be changed upon her return to separate her from resident (A). A safety plan for resident (C) will be developed. Resident (D) was in her 60s and cognitively intact. She was interviewed and reported the same issues as resident (B). She said resident (A) speaks to them inappropriately and has touched them inappropriately. Resident (A) denied the allegation. The facility determined that the allegation was substantiated. Resident (A) will have a staff member monitoring him at all times. He will only go to the gym when there are no female residents present. Seating arrangements in the dining will be rearranged to ensure the residents' safety. Care conferences were scheduled for all of the victims and will be updated upon their conclusion.
DEPARTMENT FINDINGS:
In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed.
The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 4/25/2023 · released to the public 4/28/2023.