15
Inspections
15
Deficiencies
1
Actual Harm or Above
21
Occurrences
May 21, 2026
Last Inspection
S/S D/E/F Potential for harmS/S G Actual harm

The most recent inspection of CENTRE AVENUE HEALTH AND REHAB LLC on record is dated May 21, 2026. Across 15 published inspections, state surveyors cited 15 deficiencies, 1 of which reached actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

Colorado publishes inspections on a rolling window, so older surveys may no longer appear. Citation codes 0000 and 9999 are the surveyor's opening and closing comments, not deficiencies, and are excluded from the counts above. Where the state required one, the facility's own plan of correction is shown beneath the finding it answers.

Provider Information

Status
Active
Facility Type
SNF/NF Dual Certification
Administrator
Dale, Clinton C.
Owner
CENTRE AVENUE HEALTH AND REHAB LLC
Phone
(970) 494-2140
Payor Source
Medicare, Medicaid, Private Pay
City
FORT COLLINS
ZIP
80526-1844

Inspections & Citations

15 inspections · 15 deficiencies
5/21/2026Complaint Survey · ID 232DF3-H11 deficiency
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
A complaint survey, prompted by #CO 2793925, #CO 2998974, Incident #2641250, Incident #3019425, Incident #3019489 and Incident #3019596 was completed on 5/20/26 to 5/21/26. One deficiency was cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0760Residents are Free of Significant Med Errors
Findings
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#1 and #20) of six residents out of 20 sample residents were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Prevent Resident #20 from a missed administration of a rapid-acting insulin dose; and,-Prevent Resident #1 from receiving the wrong dose of a long-acting insulin. Findings include:Record review and interviews confirmed the facility corrected the deficient practice prior to the onsite investigation on 5/20/26 to 5/21/26, resulting in the deficiency being cited as past noncompliance with a correction date of 4/27/26. I. Incidents of insulin administration failures for Resident #20 and Resident #1On 4/8/26 at 7:00 a.m. registered nurse (RN) #2 failed to check Resident #20's blood sugar before breakfast and did not administer three units of insulin aspart (a rapid acting insulin with a duration lasting three to five hours), as ordered by the physician. Due to RN #2’s failure to monitor and administer the physician ordered insulin, Resident #20's blood glucose level (measure of the amount of sugar present in the blood) increased to 600 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) later that afternoon (4/8/26). On 4/24/26 at 7:40 p.m. RN #1 obtained Resident #1's blood sugar, which was 127 mg/dl, and administered the resident’s scheduled dose of three units of insulin glargine (a long lasting insulin with a duration of 24 hours). However, RN #1 inadvertently administered 30 units of insulin glargine instead of the physician ordered dose of three units. Due to RN #1’s failure to ensure the correct dose of insulin was administered to Resident #1, the resident’s blood glucose level decreased to 60 mg/dl and the resident experienced lethargy and difficulty staying awake. II. Facility plan of correctionThe corrective action plan the facility implemented in response to the incidents of the missed insulin administration for Resident #20 on 4/8/26, and the administration of the wrong dose of insulin for Resident #1 on 4/24/26 was provided by the chief nursing officer on 5/21/26 at 10:37 a.m. The corrective action plan documented the following: A. Immediate action for affected residents included the following:RN #2 notified the provider Resident #20’s missed administration of the resident’s morning insulin dose on 4/8/26. RN #2 was educated on 4/9/26 to prioritize diabetic medications in the morning and to ask for assistance if running behind on work. On 4/24/26 the facility notified the provider, the resident’s representative and the director of nursing (DON) regarding Resident #1 receiving the wrong dose of insulin on 4/24/26. Resident #1 was notified of the medication error on 4/24/26 and was educated on signs and symptoms of low blood sugar and the use of glucagon (an emergency treatment for low blood sugar). Resident #1 was given orange juice, peanut butter, crackers and candy in response to the incorrect insulin administration. Resident #1 was placed on alert charting highlighting blood glucose checks every three hours initially and then increased to every one hour blood glucose checks. Education in response to the insulin medication error was provided to RN #1 by the DON on 4/24/26. RN #1 was observed during insulin administration on 4/25/26 to ensure she followed safe practices. Education was provided to charge nurses on 4/25/26 which included reviewing insulin orders in detail prior to administration. The medical director was notified on 4/25/26 by the on-call nurse practitioner of the insulin overdose administered to Resident #1 (on 4/24/26). B. Identification of other residents having the potential to be affected by the deficient practiceThe facility documented 11 additional residents that required insulin for treatment of diabetes mellitus. C. Measures or systemic changes to ensure the deficient practice will not recurThe facility documented the completion of a house wide audit on 4/25/26, which included a review of all current residents’ insulin orders to determine if insulin had been correctly administered. The facility documented nursing staff education was completed on 4/25/26. The education included the rights of medication administration and a review of critical medications and documentation of online training titled “The Dangers of Medication Administration.” The nursing staff education additionally included the implementation of the use of a second nurse for verification of insulin orders during medication administration. The facility documented completion of insulin administration audits and competencies on 4/25/26 for nursing staff who were at the facility at the time and who routinely administered insulin. The facility plan included audits of insulin orders, insulin administration documentation and second nurse verification of insulin administration documentation daily for twelve weeks. The facility documented an ad hoc (spontaneous discussion scheduled to address an unexpected concern) quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) meeting on 4/27/26 with the medical director (MD), the nursing home administrator (NHA), the DON, the social services director (SSD) and the clinical manager determined the necessary re-education of all nursing staff which included: -Education about critical medication and insulin dosing before administration and the10 Rights of Medication Administration; -The addition of supplemental documentation which included second nurse verification; -Staff education (Rights of Medication Administration, critical medications), and through the online education (The Dangers of Medication Administration); and,-Insulin administration audits and competencies were initiated for nursing staff who routinely administered insulin. D. Plan to monitor for sustained complianceThe facility documented nursing leadership would be auditing residents’ insulin orders and administration documentation and second nurse verification of insulin administration daily for 12 weeks. Nurses would be observed administering insulin by the DON or the pharmacist or designee. The facility documented the initiation of a QAPI Performance Improvement Project (PIP) on 4/27/26 for monitoring corrective action and the facility’s plan was to review findings at the monthly QAPI meeting for a minimum of three months. The facility documented adjustments would be made to the plan to ensure sustained compliance. E. The facility documented the date of compliance was 4/27/26. III. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Administration policy, revised 5/6/26, was provided by the chief nursing officer on 5/21/26 at 4:59 p.m. It read in pertinent part,“Ensure that the six rights of medication administration are followed: right resident, right drug, right dosage, right route, right time, and right documentation.“Review medication administration records (MAR) to identify medication to be administered. The Medication Errors policy, implemented 4/11/26, was provided by the chief nursing officer on 5/12/26 at 4:59 p.m. It read in pertinent part, “It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors. “The facility will ensure medications will be administered according to physician orders.“Significant medication error means one which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his/her health and safety.” IV. Resident #20 A. Resident statusResident #20, age 89, was admitted on 10/30/25. According to the May 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, long term use of insulin, glaucoma, scoliosis and chronic lower back pain. The 4/30/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment identified Resident #20 was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The MDS assessment revealed the resident used a wheelchair, and required assistance with transfers, bathing, dressing and her vision was highly impaired. The MDS assessment indicated the resident received insulin injections. B. Resident interviewResident #20 was interviewed on 5/21/26 at 2:00 p.m. Resident #20 said she had diabetes for many years and always wanted to know her blood glucose levels and insulin dosages so she could keep track of her diabetes. She said she sometimes had felt symptoms of high or low blood sugars and she would let the nurses know when she had felt symptoms. C. Record reviewThe diabetes care plan, initiated 11/24/25, revealed Resident #20’s potential for complications, including hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) related to diabetes mellitus. Interventions included administering medications and blood sugar checks as ordered and as needed. A review of Resident #20’s April 2026 CPO revealed revealed the following physician’s orders: Blood glucose monitoring before meals and at bedtime related to type 1 diabetes. Call the provider if blood glucose is less than 70 mg/dl or greater than 400 mg/dl, ordered on 11/19/25. Inject three units of insulin aspart subcutaneously (under the skin) one time a day before breakfast for type 1 diabetes mellitus, ordered on 3/22/26. Review of Resident #20’s April 2026 MAR revealed no blood glucose level was recorded and no insulin aspart was documented as being administered to the resident on 4/8/26 at 7:00 a.m. On 4/8/26 at 1:38 p.m. the April 2026 MAR revealed Resident #20's blood glucose level was 191.0 mg/dl. On 4/8/26 at 3:28 p.m. the April 2026 MAR revealed Resident #20's blood glucose level had increased to 600 mg/dl. A nursing progress note, dated 4/8/26 at 3:28 p.m. revealed the physician was notified about Resident #20’s elevated blood glucose level. The note documented the physician ordered monitoring of Resident #20 for signs and symptoms of high blood glucose and checking Resident #20’s blood glucose one hour later. The note documented a new physician’s order to inject insulin aspart subcutaneously before meals per a sliding insulin scale in addition to the scheduled insulin aspart dose. On 4/8/26 at 6:27 p.m. the April 2026 MAR revealed Resident #20's blood glucose level was 352 mg/dl. On 4/9/26 at 7:14 a.m. the April 2026 MAR revealed Resident #20's blood glucose level was 162 mg/dl. A medication/treatment error incident investigation, signed by RN #2 on 4/9/24, documented RN #2 did not check Resident #20's blood sugar before breakfast and did not administer insulin aspart three units as ordered by the physician. D. Staff interviewRN #2 was interviewed on 5/21/26 at 2:14 p.m. RN #2 said she usually worked on the first floor of the facility, but on 4/8/26 she was scheduled to work on the second floor where Resident #20's room was located. RN #2 said on 4/8/26 she worked the 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. shift and there were a lot of residents to check for blood glucose levels on that morning. RN #2 said she got behind that morning and did not catch up in time for checking Resident #20's blood glucose level and administering the resident’s morning insulin dose. RN #2 said she reported the missed blood glucose level check and missed morning insulin aspart dose to the DON on 4/8/26 at approximately 2:00 p.m. RN #2 said she additionally reported the missed administration to the oncoming nurse at the change of shift. RN #2 said she should have recognized earlier that she was getting behind with her medication administration and she should have notified the charge nurse at that time so Resident #20 would receive her scheduled insulin. V. Resident #1A. Resident Status Resident #1, age 66, was admitted on 4/21/26 and discharged to home on 5/11/26. According to the May 2026 CPO, diagnoses included diabetes, right sided weakness as result of a previous stroke and right hip and right knee pain after a recent fall at home. The 4/24/26 MDS assessment identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13 out of 15. The MDS assessment revealed the resident was dependent for assistance with sitting to standing and transfers, and required substantial assistance with bathing, toileting, and lower body dressing. The MDS assessment indicated the resident received insulin injections. B. Record Review The diabetes care plan, initiated 4/21/26, revealed Resident #1 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Interventions included administering medications as ordered and monitoring for signs and symptoms of high blood sugar and low blood sugar. A review of Resident #1’s April 2026 CPO revealed the following physician’s order:Inject three units of insulin glargine subcutaneously one time a day for type 2 diabetes, ordered 4/21/26. Review of Resident #1’s April 2026 MAR revealed RN #1 documented the administration of three units of insulin glargine to Resident #1 on 4/24/26 at 7:46 p.m. An on-call nurse practitioner’s progress note, dated 4/24/26 at 9:11 p.m. revealed the nurse practitioner was notified about a medication error for Resident #1. The note documented Resident #1 had received 30 units of Lantus (insulin glargine) and the correct dose for administration was three units. The note documented the nurse practitioner was concerned for low blood sugars and blood glucose checks were ordered for 12:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. A nursing progress note, dated 4/24/26 at 10:14 p.m., revealed Resident #1’s blood sugar level at 7:40 p.m. was 127 mg/dl. After obtaining the resident’s blood sugar, RN #1 later returned to the resident’s room to administer the resident’s insulin. After administering the resident’s insulin, RN #1 returned to her medication cart to chart the insulin administration and realized the amount of insulin she administered was incorrect (RN #1 administered 30 units of glargine insulin instead of 3 units of insulin - see RN #1 interview below) RN #1 returned to Resident #1, explained the insulin overdose to Resident #1, provided orange juice to the resident and directed Resident #1 to call if he experienced signs or symptoms of low blood sugar. RN #1 continued to monitor Resident #1 and the resident’s representative and the on-call nurse practitioner were notified. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 2:50 a.m. revealed Resident #1's blood glucose level was 60 mg/dl on 4/24/26 at 11:30 p.m. and glucose and orange juice were provided to Resident #1. Resident #1's blood glucose level recheck 15 minutes later (11:45 p.m.) was 90 mg/dl. The note documented Resident #1 was lethargic and had a difficult time staying awake. The note documented the on-call nurse practitioner was notified again and ordered continued monitoring of Resident #1’s blood glucose levels. Resident #1’s blood glucose level at 2:30 a.m was 111 mg/dl and Resident #1 was provided protein snacks. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 6:40 a.m., revealed Resident #1 was alert in bed and his blood glucose level was 60 mg/dl. The resident was given yogurt and 240 ml (milliliter) of orange juice with four sugars added. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 7:00 a.m. revealed Resident #1 was alert and was transferred to the toilet and had a large loose bowel movement. The note documented Resident #1's blood glucose level was 65 mg/dl and an Ensure shake was administered to the resident. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 7:24 a.m., revealed Resident #1 was awake and alert and his blood glucose level was 88 mg/dl. The resident’s vital signs were stable. A call was placed to the DON to inform him of the medication error. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 8:00 a.m., revealed Resident #1 was eating breakfast and his blood glucose level was 86 mg/dl. The RN charge nurse was made aware of the situation and the provider was notified with instructions to continue frequent monitoring of the resident. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 10:32 a.m., revealed Resident #1 was checked on every 15 to 20 minutes and the resident's blood glucose levels were checked every 30 to 60 minutes. The note documented Resident #1's regular nurse practitioner was notified and a physician’s order was received for monitoring blood glucose levels every hour, calling the nurse practitioner at 1:00 p.m for an update, and also to call the nurse practitioner and send the resident to the emergency room if Resident #1 was symptomatic. The resident’s representative was called to update her on the resident’s status. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 11:06 a.m., revealed Resident #1's blood glucose level was 66 mg/dl and peanut butter and crackers were provided to the resident. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 1:37 p.m, revealed Resident #1's blood glucose level at 1:00 p.m was 95 mg/dl. The note documented Resident #1's nurse practitioner was notified and orders were received to continue checking the resident’s blood glucose levels every hour and place a call back to the nurse practitioner with a report of the resident’s status at 5:00 p.m. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 4:13 p.m., revealed Resident #1's blood glucose level was 70 mg/dl and glucose tabs were administered to the resident. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 5:17 p.m., revealed Resident #1's blood glucose level was 75 mg/dl and the resident’s dinner was being served. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 5:18 p.m., revealed Resident #1 had multiple stools due to all of the food and juice. The note documented Resident #1 said he was not happy that he had been in bed most of the day because his blood glucose levels were not stable enough for him to get up. The resident verbalized understanding that it was for his safety. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 5:25 p.m., revealed Resident #1's nurse practitioner was notified and orders were received for continuing the resident’s blood glucose level checks every hour until 9:00 p.m., at which time the nurse practitioner was to be called with an update of resident status. The note documented Resident #1’s insulin was to be held until 4/27/26. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 6:01 p.m., revealed Resident #1's blood glucose level was 146 mg/dl and he was tired but alert. A nursing progress note, dated 4/25/26 at 11:29 p.m., revealed Resident #1's blood glucose level was stable, he had eaten a nutritious snack prior to going to sleep and he was resting comfortably in bed. The resident’s blood glucose levels would continue to be monitored throughout the night. The facility’s medication error report, dated 4/24/26, revealed RN #1 called Resident #1's representative on 4/24/26 at 9:08 p.m. and she notified the on-call nurse practitioner on 4/24/26 at 9:11 p.m. C. Frequent visitor interview A frequent visitor to the facility was interviewed on 5/20/26 at 10:43 a.m. The frequent visitor said she met with Resident #1 on 5/1/26. The frequent visitor said Resident #1 told her he felt awful the night of the insulin overdose and that staff kept waking him up, but he did not feel unsafe at the facility. The frequent visitor said the facility’s prevention plan was to re-educate RN #1 and the facility had a plan to re-educate all nursing staff. D. Staff interviewsRN #1 was interviewed on 5/21/26 at 10:04 a.m. RN #1 said she did not usually work on the floor where Resident #1 resided. She said 4/24/26 was the first time she administered insulin to Resident #1. RN #1 said on 4/24/26 at 7:55 p.m. she looked at the physician’s order for Resident #1 and dialed in 30 units on the Semglee (insulin glargine) insulin pen. RN #1 said she administered the 30 units of Semglee insulin with the insulin pen to Resident #1 on 4/24/26 at 7:55 p.m. RN #1 said when she went back to document the insulin dose, she realized the physician’s order was for 3 units of Semglee insulin and not the 30 units of Semglee insulin she had administered. RN #1 said she immediately got orange juice and candy for Resident #1, told the resident what had happened and stayed with Resident #1 for 15 minutes. RN #1 said shechecked the resident’s blood glucose level and the resident said he was feeling okay. RN #1 said she contacted the nurse practitioner on call who gave orders to monitor Resident #1' s blood glucose levels and treat the resident for low blood glucose. RN #1 said she called the DON to inform him of the situation. RN #1 said she spoke with Resident #1’s representative 30 minutes later, after Resident #1 had texted the representative about the insulin overdose. RN #1 said the resident’s representative was upset and RN #1 said she understood this was upsetting to the family. RN #1 said she checked Resident #1's blood glucose level and gave him peanut butter and crackers before she left the facility at the end of her shift. RN #1 said Resident #1 was doing okay when she left. Certified nurse aide (CNA) #1 was interviewed on 5/21/26 at 11:14 a.m. CNA #1 said she worked the evening shift on 4/24/26 when the insulin overdose administration occurred with Resident #1. She said she was told by RN #1 that Resident #1 needed to be monitored for symptoms of low blood sugar every five minutes. CNA #1 said she observed Resident #1 for symptoms of a change in alertness during the evening. CNA #1 said Resident #1 did not report symptoms of low blood sugar to RN #1. VI. Additional staff interviews The DON was interviewed on 5/21/26 at 5:45 p.m. The DON said he became aware of Resident #20's missed insulin dose through a record review, as he was not the DON at the time of the incident. The DON said RN #2 should have recognized that she was getting behind on her medication administration and notified the charge nurse immediately, at the time Resident #20's insulin was not administered on time according to the physician’s orders. The DON said RN #1 notified him of Resident #1's insulin overdose on 4/24/26 at about 9:00 p.m., after she had notified the on-call nurse practitioner and Resident #1's representative. The DON said RN #1 should have contacted him right away for a significant insulin medication administration error, where the physician’s order was not followed and ten times the insulin dose was administered to the resident. The DON said the nursing staff provided updates on the resident’s status to him during the night and the next day. He said Resident #1 was tired during the next day and returned to baseline later the following day (on 4/25/26). The DON said an insulin overdose of ten times the dose ordered could have caused hospitalization, organ failure and adverse outcomes. Resident #1's primary care physician was interviewed on 5/21/26 at 2:58 p.m. The primary care physician said he was in the facility on 4/9/26 and spoke to Resident #20 about her intake of candy during lunchtime on 4/8/26. PCP #1 said he monitored Resident #20’s condition after the missed insulin dose and said Resident #20's diabetes was difficult to control. The primary care physician said he was notified the next day about the incident with Resident #1 by the on-call provider service. The primary care physician said it was within the possibility that there could likely be harm when someone received ten times the dose of 30 units of insulin when someone was used to receiving only three units of insulin. The primary care physician said prevention for recurrence of this type of incident included staff education and this was primarily the responsibility of the medical director (MD). The MD was interviewed on 5/21/26 at 03:35 p.m. The MD said she was notified of Resident #20's missed insulin dose and blood glucose check. She said Resident #20's diabetes was difficult to control. The MD said she was notified of Resident #1's insulin overdose on 4/25/26 by the nurse practitioner on call and she was aware of Resident #1's status through 4/27/26, when she checked in with Resident #1. The MD said she routinely reviewed the facility’s medication errors and assisted in providing staff education. The MD said she participated in the 4/27/26 QAPI meeting to review Resident #1’s insulin medication error and the facility’s corrective action plan.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
5/21/2026Licensure Complaint Survey · ID 232DF6-H1No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A survey with #CO 2793927 was completed on 5/20/26 to 5/21/26. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/3/2025Complaint Survey · ID 1D5AB1-H1No deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
A complaint survey, prompted by #CO2603280 and Incident #2602908 was completed on 9/2/25 and 9/3/25. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
6/5/2025Complaint Survey · ID 3BO211No deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
A complaint survey, prompted by #CO39833, #CO40165 and Incident #39994 was conducted on 6/4/25 to 6/5/25. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
2/12/2025Revisit: Recertification Survey · ID 895W22No deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
A document revisit was completed with all deficiencies being corrected with the exception of any waived deficiency or deficiencies. All waived deficiencies will be corrected at a later date as per the approved waiver. A plan of correction is not required.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
12/5/2024Complaint Survey · ID TH6711No deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
A survey prompted by #CO38175 was conducted on 12/4/24 to 12/5/24. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
10/29/2024Recertification Survey · ID 895W217 deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
INITIAL COMMENTS (ID Prefix Tag #K000) are informational only and a representation of the facility's general characteristics. This survey was conducted in accordance with the Federal Register at Section 42 CFR 483.70(a). The facility is a two-story, Type II (111) construction. The facility is protected throughout by a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13 automatic fire suppression system and is classified as Fully Sprinkled. The facility was constructed in 2000 and is licensed for 90 beds. This re-certification survey, conducted on October 29th, 2024, was conducted to comply with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 101) Life Safety Code (2012) "Chapter 19, Existing Health Care Occupancies". The deficiencies cited were discussed with the Administrator and Maintenance Director during the exit conference conducted at the end of the on-site survey. The Administrator reported the daily census to be 76 residents on October 29th, 2024.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0211Means of Egress - GeneralS/S F
Findings
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange and maintain the means of egress in accordance with Life Safety Code Section 19.2 and Chapter 7. 1. Propane being stored in the path of egress from therapy needs to be removed. 2. Storage in the stairwell near the kitchen needs to be removed. NFPA 101, 7.1.10.1* General. Means of egress shall be continuously maintained free of all obstructions or impediments to full instant use in the case of fire or other emergency. NFPA 101, 19.2.1 General. Every aisle, passageway, corridor, exit discharge, exit location, and access shall be in accordance with Chapter 7This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors throughout the facility. The administrator and maintenance director discussed deficient items at the exit conference.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe facility removed the propane tanks and cleared the kitchen stairwell of itemsProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection of all means of egress to ensure they are continuously maintained free of all obstructions or impediments. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by the Maintenance Director for three months. The maintenance Director or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly monitoring of the corridors will be reported by the Administrator to the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting following the implementation of the POC and for three months following. TitleThe Maintenance Director is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of CorrectionDate10/30/24
0321Hazardous Areas - EnclosureS/S E
Findings
Based on observation and staff interview during the course of the survey it was determined the facility failed to maintain hazard areas in accordance with NFPA 101 1. Combustible storage is in the elevator room, containing boxes containing COVID tests and the building plans. 2. Basement storage needs fire stopping is needed for sprinkler pipe 3. The activity storage room has ceiling penetrations 7.14.6.2* Elevator machine rooms associated with occupant evacuation elevators shall be used for no purpose other than elevator machine rooms. 10.19.5.1 Combustible material shall not be stored in boiler rooms, mechanical rooms, or electrical equipment rooms. NFPA 101, 8.3.1.2 Fire barriers shall comply with one of the following:(1) The fire barriers are continuous from outside wall to outside wall or from one fire barrier to another, or a combination thereof, including continuity through all concealed spaces, such as those found above a ceiling, including interstitial spaces.(2) The fire barriers are continuous from outside wall to outside wall or from one fire barrier to another, and from the floor to the bottom of the interstitial space, provided that the construction assembly forming the bottom of the interstitial space has a fire resistance rating not less than that of the fire barrier. 8.3.2.3 Interior walls and partitions of nonsymmetrical construction shall be evaluated from both directions and assigned a fire resistance rating based on the shorter duration obtained in accordance with ASTM E 119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, or ANSI/UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials. When the wall is tested with the least fire-resistive side exposed to the furnace, the wall shall not be required to be subjected to tests from the opposite side. 8.3.1.3 Walls used as fire barriers shall comply with Chapter 7 of NFPA 221, Standard for High Challenge Fire Walls, Fire Walls, and Fire Barrier Walls. The NFPA 221 limitation on percentage width of openings shall not apply. This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors throughout the facility. The maintenance Director discussed deficient items at the exit conference.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe facility removed the items from elevator room, administered fire stopping in basement storage for sprinkler pipe and in the activity storage room ceiling penetration. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection of the elevator room and fire barriers to ensure compliance. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by the Maintenance Director for three months. The maintenance Director or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly monitoring of the corridors will be reported by the Administrator to the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting following the implementation of the POC and for three months following. TitleThe Maintenance Director is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of CorrectionDate10/30/24
0324Cooking FacilitiesS/S E
Findings
Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the kitchen hood suppression system as required by NFPA 96, (Chapter 12, Section 12.1.2.3.1) and cooking appliance restraint as required by NFPA 54, 9.6.1.2. 1. Only half of the cooking appliances have wheel chaulks, or means for the cooking appliances to return to proper locations underneath Hood Suppression System. NFPA 96 (2011) Section 12.1.2.3.1: An approved method shall be provided that will ensure that the appliance is returned to an approved design location. NFPA 54 -2012 Fuel and Gas Code 9.6.1.2 Restraints. Movement of appliances with casters shall be limited by a restraining device installed in accordance with the connector and appliance manufacturer installation instructions. This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Administrator at the exit conference.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe facility installed wheel chaulks for the cooking appliances that were missing them. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection of the cooking appliances to monitor them for floor chaulks. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by the Maintenance Director for three months. The maintenance Director or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly monitoring of the wheel chaulks will be reported by the Administrator to the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting following the implementation of the POC and for three months following. TitleThe Maintenance Director is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of CorrectionDate11/06/24
0341Fire Alarm System - InstallationS/S F
Findings
Based on observation during the course of the survey it was determined the facility failed to notify DFPC for installation of a new FACP. This is evident through NFPA 101 and NFPA 72.1. Fire panel was replaced on 8/22/24 need to come in for a plan reviewNFPA 10119.3.4 Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems. 19.3.4.1 General. Health care occupancies shall be provided with a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 9.6.9.6.1.3 A fire alarm system required for life safety shall be installed, tested, and maintained in accordance with the applicable requirements of NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, unless it is an approved existing installation, which shall be permitted to be continued in use. NFPA 7210.18.1 Approval and Acceptance. 10.18.1.1 The authority having jurisdiction shall be notified prior to installation or alteration of equipment or wiring. 10.18.1.2* At the authority having jurisdiction ' s request, complete information regarding the system or system alterations, including specifications, type of system or service, shop drawings, input/output matrix, battery calculations, and notification appliance circuit voltage drop calculations, shall be submitted for approval. 10.18.1.3 Before requesting final approval of the installation, if required by the authority having jurisdiction, the installing contractor shall furnish a written statement stating that the system has been installed in accordance with approved plans and tested in accordance with the manufacturer ' s published instructions and the appropriate NFPA requirements. 10.18.1.4* The record of completion form, Figure 10.18.2.1.1, shall be permitted to be a part of the written statement required in 10.18.1.3. When more than one contractor has been responsible for the installation, each contractor shall complete the portions of the form for which that contractor had responsibility. 10.18.1.5 The record of completion form, Figure 10.18.2.1.1, shall be permitted to be a part of the documents that support the requirements of 10.18.2.4. This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include staff and visitors within the basement level. Deficient items were discussed with the Administrator and Maintenance Director at the exit conference.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe facility contacted the third-party installation company to request they complete the notification process and request DCFP to complete the review process for the new FACP.ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to communication with Meridian Fire and DCFP for correct notification and approval for completion of work. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by the Maintenance Director. The maintenance Director or designee will communication with Meridian and DCFP to meet compliance. The Administrator will report to the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting following the implementation of the POC.TitleThe Maintenance Director is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of CorrectionDate12/05/24
0353Sprinkler System - Maintenance and TestingS/S F
Findings
Through observation during the documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the protection requirements in accordance with NFPA 101, 25, and 13.1. Room 139, the laundry room, and the walk-in freezer have a corroded sprinkler head 2. There are wires on the sprinkler pipe in the Fire Riser room and in the basement storage room. 3. The freezer and walk-in cooler sprinkler heads need to be intermediate temperature sprinkler heads. 19.3.5.1 Buildings containing nursing homes shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, unless otherwise permitted by 19.3.5.5. NFPA 25 5.2.1.1.2 Any sprinkler that shows signs of any of the following shall be replaced: (1) Leakage, (2) Corrosion, (3) Physical damage, (4) Loss of fluid in the glass bulb heat responsive element, (5)* Loading (6) Painting unless painted by the sprinkler manufacturer. NFPA 25 5.2.2.2 Sprinkler piping shall not be subjected to external loads by materials either resting on the pipe or hung from the pipe. NFPA 13 8.3.2.58.3.2.5* The following practices shall be observed to provide sprinklers of other than ordinary-temperature classification unless other temperatures are determined or unless high-temperature sprinklers are used throughout, and temperature selection shall be in accordance with Table 8.3.2.5(a), Table 8.3.2.5(b), and Figure 8.3.2.5:(1)Sprinklers in the high-temperature zone shall be of the high-temperature classification, and sprinklers in the intermediate-temperature zone shall be of the intermediate-temperature classification.(2)Sprinklers located within 12 in. (305 mm) to one side or 30 in. (762 mm) above an uncovered steam main, heating coil, or radiator shall be of the intermediate-temperature classification.(3)Sprinklers within 7 ft (2.1 m) of a low-pressure blowoff valve that discharges free in a large room shall be of the high-temperature classification.(4)Sprinklers under glass or plastic skylights exposed to the direct rays of the sun shall be of the intermediate-temperature classification.(5)Sprinklers in an unventilated, concealed space, under an uninsulated roof, or in an unventilated attic shall be of the intermediate-temperature classification.(6)Sprinklers in unventilated show windows having high-powered electric lights near the ceiling shall be of the intermediate-temperature classification.(7)Sprinklers protecting commercial-type cooking equipment and ventilation systems shall be of the high- or extra high–temperature classification as determined by use of a temperature-measuring device. (See 7.10.6.)(8)Sprinklers protecting residential areas installed near specific heat sources identified in Table 8.3.2.5(c) shall be installed in accordance with Table 8.3.2.5(c).(9)Ordinary-temperature sprinklers located adjacent to a heating duct that discharges air that is less than 100°F (38°C) are not required to be separated in accordance with Table 8.3.2.5(a).(10)Sprinklers in walk-in type coolers and freezers with automatic defrosting shall be of the intermediate-temperature classification or higher. These deficiencies can potentially affect occupants, including residents, staff, and visitors throughout the facility. The administrator and maintenance director discussed deficient items at the exit conference.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe facility will replace the identified corroded sprinkler heads, remove wiring on sprinkler piping and replace walk in cooler heads to intermediate. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection of all sprinkler heads to ensure they are continuously maintained free of all corrosion and to monitor for wires to be kept off sprinkler piping. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by the Maintenance Director for three months. The maintenance Director or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly monitoring of the sprinkler head will be reported by the Administrator to the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting following the implementation of the POC and for three months following. TitleThe Maintenance Director is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of CorrectionDateScheduled Maintenance Date: 11/21/2024
0363Corridor - DoorsS/S E
Findings
Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain corridor doors in accordance with NFPA 101 and NFPA 80. 1. 242 door gapping greater than ½ inch on the floor 2. Doors 245, 120 and 127 do not fully latchNFPA 80 5.2.1* Fire door assemblies shall be inspected and tested not less than annually, and a written record of the inspection shall be signed and kept for inspection by the AHJ.NFPA 101 7.2.1.3.3 Thresholds at door openings shall not exceed 1/2 in. (13 mm) in height. NFPA 101, 19.3.6.3.1* Doors protecting corridor openings in other than required enclosures of vertical openings, exits, or hazardous areas shall be doors constructed to resist the passage of smoke and shall be constructed of materials such as the following: (1) 13/4 in. (44 mm) thick, solid-bonded core wood(2) Material that resists fire for a minimum of 20 minutesNFPA 101, 19.3.6.3.5* Doors shall be provided with a means for keeping the door closed that is acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, and the following requirements also shall apply:(1) The device used shall be capable of keeping the door fully closed if a force of 5 lbf (22 N) is applied at the latch edge of the door.(2)Roller latches shall be prohibited on corridor doors in buildings not fully protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 19.3.5.7. This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the administrator and maintenance director at the exit conference.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe facility fixed the door in room 242 to meet code with a gap not exceeding ½ inch in height. Rooms 120, 127, and 245 were corrected to fully latch. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection of all fire doors to ensure they are continuously maintained to fully latch and meet the requirement for clearance between bottom of door and floor to not exceed ½ inch. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by the Maintenance Director for three months. The maintenance Director or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly monitoring of the doors will be reported by the Administrator to the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting following the implementation of the POC and for three months following. TitleThe Maintenance Director is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of CorrectionDate11/20/24
0511Utilities - Gas and ElectricS/S D
Findings
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain wiring in accordance with NFPA 101, 99 and NFPA 70.1. Room 237 has string lights around the room. NFPA 101 9.1.2 Electrical Systems. Electrical wiring and equipment shall be in accordance with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, unless such installations are approved existing installations, which shall be permitted to be continued in service. NFPA 99 6.3.2.1.1 Distribution system arrangements shall be designed to minimize interruptions to the electrical systems due to internal failures by the use of adequately rated equipment. 590.3 Time Constraints.(B) 90 Days. Temporary electric power and lighting installations shall be permitted for a period not to exceed 90 days for holiday decorative lighting and similar purposes. This deficiency can potentially affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within this area of the smoke compartment of the facility. Deficient items were discussed with the administrator and maintenance director at the exit conference
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe facility removed the string lights from resident room 237. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection of all resident rooms to ensure they meet life safety requirements pertaining to string lights. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by the Maintenance Director for three months. The maintenance Director or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly monitoring of the resident rooms will be reported by the Administrator to the Quality Assurance and Assessment meeting following the implementation of the POC and for three months following. TitleThe Maintenance Director is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of CorrectionDate10/30/24
10/3/2024Complaint, Recertification Survey · ID 895W11No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note2 building records
Findings · record 1 of 2
A recertification survey with complaint #CO37582 was completed on 9/30/24 to 10/3/24. No deficiencies were cited.
Findings · record 2 of 2
An Emergency Preparedness survey was conducted from 9/30/24 to 10/3/24. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
9/9/2024Complaint Survey · ID ZQ4811No deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
A complaint survey, prompted by #CO37235 was conducted on 9/9/24. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
6/26/2023Revisit: Recertification Survey · ID LVBC22No deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
All Tags have been corrected and facility now complies.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
6/21/2023Revisit: State Licensure Survey · ID 5Z2V12No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A revisit survey was completed on 6/21/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 4/18/23. The facility is in compliance with all regulations surveyed.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
6/21/2023Revisit: Recertification Survey · ID LVBC12No deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A revisit survey was completed on 6/21/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 4/18/23. The facility is in compliance with all regulations surveyed.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
5/11/2023Recertification Survey · ID LVBC213 deficiencies
0000INITIAL COMMENTSSurveyor note
Findings
INITIAL COMENTS (ID Prefix Tag #K000) are informational only and a representation of the facility's general characteristics. This survey was conducted in accordance with the Federal Register at Section 42 CFR 483.70(a). The facility is two story, Type II (111), construction. The facility is protected throughout by a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13 automatic fire suppression systems and is classified as Fully Sprinklered. The facility was constructed in 2000 and is license for 90 beds. This re-certification survey conducted on May 11, 2023 was for compliance with the National Fire Protection Association, (NFPA 101) Life Safety Code (2012) "Chapter 19, Existing Health Care Occupancies". The deficiencies cited were discussed with the Administrator and Maintenance Director during the exit conference conducted at the end on-site survey. The Administrator reported the daily census to be 78 residents on May 11, 2023.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0345Fire Alarm System - Testing and MaintenanceS/S F
Findings
STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based review of the records and discussion during the survey, it was determined the facility failed to inspect and test the fire alarm system per NFPA 101, Chapter 9 (Section 9.6 Paragraph 9.6.1.4) and NFPA 72, (Chapter 7, Paragraph 7-1.2.2). Failure to maintain and test the fire alarm system has the potential to harm all occupants, staff and visitor in the build if the fire alarm system failed to operate if a fire was to occur. During the review of the records, with the Administrator, documentation was not available to verify the sensitivity testing of the smoke detectors per NFPA 101 2012 Edition 19.3.4.1, 9.6.1.3, NFPA 72 7-3 and 7-3.2.1. The Administrator acknowledged the condition of testing the fire alarm system during the record review.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
Corrective ActionThe annual inspection for the sensitivity testing of the smoke detectors will be conducted by Meridian Fire Safety on before June 26, 2023. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform the biennial inspection through a contracted provider and for the maintenance supervisor to keep a written record sensitivity testing of the smoke detectors provided by the vendor. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed upon the next biennial inspection of the smoke detectors, by having the administrator sign-off on the continuance of the recurring scheduled maintenance. The maintenance supervisor or designee will keep a written record of each inspection and any maintenance records provided by the vendor. The annual testing of the will be reported by the maintenance supervisor or designee to the Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) meeting following the implementation of the POC and following the next annual inspection. All results and maintenance documented by the vendor will be reported. TitleThe maintenance supervisor or his/her designee is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of Correction. Completion Date06/26/2023
0363Corridor - DoorsS/S F
Findings
STANDARD is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and staff interview during the course of the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain corridor doors in accordance with the Life Safety Code Section 19.3.6.3. This deficient practice could affect all residents within the smoke compartments should the egress become untenable, due to smoke and heat transfer via the non-latching corridor doors. This was evidenced by the following: Corridor doors were not maintained to close and positively latch, as required. Door opening in the cross-corridor 2nd floor Library to dining would not latch and close completely into the door frames creating a rated barrier. The Director of Maintenance acknowledge the corridor door condition during the facility tour. The Life Safety Code Section 19.3.6.3.2 requires that corridor doors be provided with the means suitable for keeping the door closed that is acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction. Doors must be unobstructed from closing and positively latching into the door frame. Section 19.3.6.3.1, Exception #2 requires that corridor doors installed within sprinklered protected smoke compartments be constructed to resist the passage of smoke.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
K3071. Corrective ActionThe door opening in the cross-corridor 2nd floor Library to dining would not latch and close completely into the door frames creating a rated barrier. The door was serviced on 5/12/2023 to latch and close completely, creating a smoke barrier. 2. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection on the cross-corridor doors to each patient care wing, six in total, to ensure that the smoke barrier doors properly latch and close. 3. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by having the Environmental Services Director sign-off on the continuance of the recurring scheduled inspection, as well as any necessary maintenance. The maintenance supervisor or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly testing of the door latching mechanism will be reported by the maintenance supervisor or designee to the Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) meeting following the implementation of the PoC, and for three months following. All results and maintenance will be reported. 4. TitleThe Environmental Services Director or designee is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of Correction. 5. Completion Date05/12/2023
0511Utilities - Gas and ElectricS/S F
Findings
Based on observation and staff interview during the course of the survey conducted on March 1, 2018, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the building services for gas equipment in accordance with NFPA 101, 19.5, 19.5.1.1, 9.1.1, including NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code. The following evidenced this:During the walk through of the facility with the Maintenance Director;The Dryer vents had been assembled using screws:NFPA 54 10.4.4.2 Ducts for exhausting clothes dryers shall not be assembled with screws or other fastening means that extend into the duct and that would catch lint and reduce the efficiency of the exhaust system.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
1. Corrective ActionThe door opening in the cross-corridor 2nd floor Library to dining would not latch and close completely into the door frames creating a rated barrier. The door was serviced on 5/12/2023 to latch and close completely, creating a smoke barrier. 2. ProcedureThe procedure for implementing the corrective action is to perform an inspection on the cross-corridor doors to each patient care wing, six in total, to ensure that the smoke barrier doors properly latch and close. 3. MonitoringThe monitoring of the procedure will be completed monthly by having the Environmental Services Director sign-off on the continuance of the recurring scheduled inspection, as well as any necessary maintenance. The maintenance supervisor or designee will perform the inspections and keep a written record of each. The monthly testing of the door latching mechanism will be reported by the maintenance supervisor or designee to the Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) meeting following the implementation of the PoC, and for three months following. All results and maintenance will be reported. 4. TitleThe Environmental Services Director or designee is responsible for the implementation of the Plan of Correction. 5. Completion Date05/12/2023
4/18/2023State Licensure Survey · ID 5Z2V111 deficiency
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note
Findings
A licensure survey was completed on 4/12/23 to 4/18/23. One deficiency was cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0704Res Care - Accident Prevention and Attention
Findings
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (#53, #16 and #33) of eight residents reviewed for accidents out of 32 sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent an accident/hazard. Resident #53 was known to be at risk for falls on admission as he had fallen at home. The facility failed to implement effective interventions. The resident fell two times on 2/17/23, with the first fall resulting in a head wound with active bleeding where the resident was sent to the emergency department for treatment and the head wound was glued. Observations revealed fall interventions were not consistently implemented. In addition, the facility failed to:-Implement effective fall interventions for Resident #16; and, -Implement interventions when Resident #33 obtained a skin tear during a transfer to prevent it from occurring again. Findings include:I. Resident #53A. Facility policy and procedure The Skilled Nursing Facility Fall Management policy and procedure, revised on 2/8/23, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/13/23 at 4:52 p.m. It read in pertinent part: "Residents have a right to a safe environment, while maximizing their independence. Fall prevention seeks to balance resident's safety from falls while respecting individual rights and preservation of dignity. It is the facility's goal to reduce falls and injury related falls. "Admitting Nurse will complete the Fall Risk Observation upon admission. Individualized interventions will be implemented to minimize potential fall occurrence dependent upon the resident's risk. "Additional interventions for residents identified to be at greater risk: anticipate needs by observing normal routines and times of increased risk, obtain consults as appropriate, encourage adequate rest periods to prevent over tiring, and increase staff observation and avoid self isolation. Encourage inclusion in activities and social interaction." The Fall Prevention Philosophy, dated 2/1/23, was received by the clinical nurse consultant on 4/18/23 at 11:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part:"Call lights: We strive to meet each resident's needs prior to them having to use their call light. If a call light is used, it will be answered promptly and courteously by the first available staff person. "Purposeful rounding is rounding routinely to meet the resident's needs before they ask, is proactive rather than reactive, prevents falls and other injuries, takes less time than answering call lights, and is done by all nursing department staff."With each round offer toileting/check incontinence products, reposition for comfort, offer, encourage, and assist with fluids, ask about pain or discomfort, ask if there are any personal items they need or an activity they would like to participate in. Look at the environment: ensure call lights are in reach, ensure water is available and in reach, and ensure the room is free of clutter and a neat appearance."B. Resident statusResident #53, age 87, was admitted on 10/8/22. According to the April 2023 computerized physician order (CPO), the diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, repeated falls, unspecified dementia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding inside the skull) with loss of consciousness, attention and concentration deficit, cognitive communication deficit and frontal lobe and executive function deficit. The 4/3/23 facility assessment revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of three out of 15. He required extensive assistance of two persons for dressing and toileting, extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assistance of one for personal hygiene and the supervision of one person for eating. The resident was also identified to be at high risk for falls. C. Resident representative interviewThe resident was not interviewable due to his cognitive communication deficit. The resident's spouse was interviewed on 4/12/23 at 11:34 a.m. She said she was with the resident all the time because she was responsible for all choices/decisions regarding the resident's care. She stated the resident had problems understanding things. She said he fell at home in the bathroom and hit his head that caused his brain to bleed. She said after she was admitted to the facility. She said the resident had been different ever since the fall, he had a poor memory and could not carry a conversation. She said she encouraged the resident to press the call light but he did not remember and the call light was always within his reach when he was sitting in the wheelchair. She said she had concerns the resident had fallen out of his wheelchair during the night. She said the staff were not consistent with rounding, it depended who was working and varied everyday. D. ObservationsOn 4/12/23 at 2:49 p.m. the resident was in his wheelchair in his room without the call light within reach. The resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses. The resident had heel protectors on his feet that were resting on foot rests with no non-skid footwear. On 4/13/23 at approximately 9:00 a.m. to 10:05 a.m. the resident was observed in his room sitting in a wheelchair, he was dozing and abruptly woke up and cried out for his wife to take him home. No staff member entered the resident's room during that time period. The resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses, or non-skid footwear on both feet. The call light was hanging over the right armrest of the wheelchair resting on the floor. On 4/18/23 at 8:22 a.m. to 8:32 a.m. the resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses. At 9:29 a.m. the resident was yelling for help. A certified nurse assistant (CNA) arrived and attempted to calm the resident. The resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses. The call light was on his bed and the CNA tucked the call light between the gel seat cushion and left side of the wheelchair before exiting the room. At 12:42 p.m. the resident was sitting in the wheelchair in his room without a call light within reach.-The resident was not able to consistently use the call light (see family interview) and it was not placed properly for use, did not have his glasses on and often did not wear non-skid footwear. E. Record reviewThe resident was admitted to the hospital from 9/28/23 to 10/3/22 status post fall at home resulting in subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), an 8th left rib fracture, increase in impaired mobility and generalized weakness. Care planThe care plan, revised on 1/5/23, read in pertinent part: the resident was at risk for falls related to a history of falls, decreased mobility, decreased balance, advanced age, and weakness. Interventions start date 10/8/22 date included PT, OT consults, strength training, toning, positioning, transfer training, gait training, and mobility devices. The resident was not a candidate for rehabilitation service due to presenting symptoms and the resident's spouse opted for hospice care. The care plan dated 1/5/23 continued with: keep call light and personal items and frequently used items in reach. Provide the resident with an environment free of clutter. Orient resident when there has been new furniture placement or other changes in environment. If falls occur, analyze resident's falls to determine pattern/trend. Give resident verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance, provide resident with proper well-maintained footwear. Encourage the resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, handrails. Assure the floor is free of glare, liquids, and foreign objects. Assure the resident was wearing glasses and they were clean. Toileting program, 12/28/22, read as follows: assure the resident is sitting upright in his wheelchair. Interdisciplinary team to review medication regimen, padding to gap in bed and bed extenders, and included offer distraction measures updated on 1/31/23. Interdisciplinary team: ensure resident has proper footwear over heel protectors when up in wheelchair updated 2/21/23. Care plan after 2/21/23 included the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to complete root cause(s) of fall events and establish and recommend interventions. Falls Two fall events occurred on 2/17/23 at 7:15 p.m. and at 11:53 p.m. The fall at 7:15 p.m. was unwitnessed and occurred in the hallway as the resident stood upright from his unlocked wheelchair and fell backward hitting his posterior head against the floor. The resident reported he was trying to find his wife. The resident was last toileted at 5:30 p.m. and was incontinent of urine at the time of the fall. Neurological checks were completed on 2/17/23 from 7:15 p.m. through 9:00 p.m. The spouse and medical provider were notified of the fall. At approximately 9:55 p.m. the resident's head wound started to actively bleed and the provider ordered an emergency room evaluation and computed tomography (CT) scan which was negative. The head wound was glued closed and the resident was returned to the facility. The investigation of the fall revealed the resident was not wearing non-skid footwear. Purposeful rounding stopped at 6:45 p.m. (30 minutes before the first fall). Root cause per interdisciplinary team (IDT): Urine incontinence. Interventions: proper footwear, educate the resident on importance of using call light, rearrange room.-There was no documentation the second fall on 2/17/23 at 11:53 p.m. was investigated. A third unwitnessed fall occurred on 3/20/23 at 1:35 a.m. The resident was found on the floor at his bedside, stating he wanted to "go out." No injury noted. Neurological checks were completed immediately after the fall through 3/22/23 on the evening shift (time not documented). The resident was incontinent of urine at the time of the fall. Last toileting/brief changed at 12:30 a.m. The spouse, hospice, and the medical provider were notified. Root cause per IDT: No root cause documented. Interventions: Staff implemented fall protocol, rearrange room, place bed against wall. A fourth unwitnessed fall occurred on 4/2/23 at 8:45 p.m. The resident was found on the floor leaning against his wheelchair facing the television. No injury noted. Neurological checks were completed immediately after fall through 4/5/23 on the evening shift (time not documented). The resident was not incontinent of urine at the time of the fall. Last toileting brief change at 5:45 p.m. Wife and medical provider were notified. Root cause per IDT: Believed to be agitation. Interventions: Post Void Residual Volume (no progress note related to post void residual volume output). An assisted fall occurred on 4/4/23 at 7:00 a.m. as a certified nurse assistant (CNA) was assisting the resident with a transfer from bed to wheelchair and the resident's knees buckled. The CNA lowered the resident to the floor. No injury noted. The resident was not incontinent at the time of the assisted fall. Last toileting/brief change at 5:30 a.m. Root cause per IDT: increased weakness. Interventions: Collaborate with hospice to request physical therapy for strengthening related to comfort/fall prevention (no progress note to support collaborative practice with hospice/physical therapy). F. Staff interviewsCNA #2 was interviewed on 4/13/23 at 2:10 p.m. He said the toileting program was knowing the resident's bowel and bladder habits and taking the resident to the toilet before they were incontinent. He said he used the Kardex (an abbreviated directive) to make sure he knew when to toilet residents but said it was "way too much" when he was the only CNA on the unit. CNA #1 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 9:46 a.m. She said purposeful rounding was checking on residents every two hours to make sure they were okay and respond to their needs in a timely manner. She further explained, she was assigned to 15 residents and many were dependent on her for transfers but if she could not find help then she could not always round. The NHA was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:15 a.m. The NHA said the toileting program was located on the Kardex. The Kardex was generated every morning/evening (if needed) for the CNAs to offer toileting to residents because continence was a priority. The clinical nurse consultant (CNC) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 11:20 a.m. The CNC said purposeful rounding was focused on answering call lights. The CNC stated there was no mechanism in place to assure purposeful rounding was consistently done, and no documentation to support purposeful rounding was completed. The CNC said all nursing staff were educated on fall prevention and purposeful rounding on hire and annually. II. Resident #16A. Resident status Resident #16, age 61, was admitted on 3/11/23 and discharged on 3/28/23 to the hospital. According to the March 2023 CPO, the diagnoses include displaced fracture of left femur, subsequent closed fracture, unsteadiness on feet, pain in left hip and left knee, history of falling, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, kidney transplant, history of infections of the central nervous system-cryptococcal meningitis, history of sepsis (infection) and bacteremia (bacteria in bloodstream), pseudomonas (infection), type two diabetes and encephalopathy (altered mental status). The 3/17/23 facility assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15. He required one person assistance with transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. He used a walker and a wheelchair. It indicated that he had a fracture related to a fall within the last six months. B. Record review The fall risk care plan, revised on 3/28/23, documented the resident was at risk for falling related to history of falls, decreased mobility, decreased balance and a hip fracture. The interventions included assure resident is wearing eyeglasses, assure eyeglasses are clean and in good repair, assure the floor is free of glare, liquids and foreign objects, encourage resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, hand rails,etc, keep call light and personal items within reach, occupy resident with meaningful distractions, provide assistance as needed for ADLs and mobility, provide toileting assistance/toileting plan. The initial social services progress note on 3/13/23 at 5:07 p.m. indicated that the resident was independent with all ADLs with no need of mobility. -There was no intervention in his fall risk care plan related to residents identified to be at greater risk. The activities of daily living (ADL) function status/rehabilitation potential care plan, initiated on 3/12/23, documented the resident will attain and maintain the highest practicable functional level and complications will be minimized. The interventions included providing an occupational and physical therapy evaluation, enforce weight bearing restrictions as ordered, instruct in use of assistive device and monitor for correct use, provide assistance for ADL's and mobility as needed, and teach safety measures and monitor resident's safety. The 3/13/23 fall assessment documented at 9:08 p.m. the resident told the nurse he tried to roll in the bed and fell down on the floor. The nurse's progress note on 3/13/23 at 10:11 p.m. documented "the CNA informed the nurse that they came in the patient's room to help him to bed. Patient told the CNA he can't sleep and he needs his wife or someone (sic) to sleep with (sic) him in the room. The nurse told the resident that no one can be (sic) in his room during the night. Later the resident pressed the call light many times and asked the CNA if she can stay with him. There was no documentation that the staff asked the resident if they should call his wife nor did they attempt to reach the resident's wife at nightime. The facility attempted to reach the wife on 3/14/23 at 8:55 a.m. to inform the wife of the fall at night. They were unsuccessful in reaching thewife. They notified the son about the fall and he said he would visit the morning of 3/14/23." -There were no additional interventions added to the actual fall care plan related to the resident's need for increased supervision. The nurse's progress note on 3/21/23 at 12:09 p.m. documented the resident was asking for percocet for his pain. He has confusion at times. The 3/21/23 fall assessment documented at 8:08 p.m. the resident told the nurse that he slid out of his wheelchair and was lying on the floor at the end of the hall in front of the wheelchair. The care plan revealed the following intervention was added: encourage resident to become more involved in facility activities. The 3/22/23 fall assessment documented at 5:45 p.m. the resident told the nurse that he was trying to go to the bathroom. The CNA found the resident in between the toilet and the wall. The care plan revealed the following intervention was added: continue with PT/OT, social work to speak with family about changing room closer to nurse's station and explore post dialysis activities during peak time of confusion. The nurse's progress note on 3/22/23 at 5:30 p.m. documented the resident told the CNA that he saw a woman with a dog and was going after the dog. When asked by the nurse, resident said he was trying to go up a three to four run ladder. The nurse's progress note on 3/22/23 at 11:59 p.m. documented the resident complained of pain to whole body. The interventions used were low bed, appropriate footwear or grippy socks. The nurse's note on 3/23/23 at 2:03 p.m. documented the night shift night nurse reported that resident complained of right lower extremity pain overnight after his fall. The nurse's progress note on 3/23/23 at 2:46 a.m. documented the interventions used were purposeful rounding, appropriate footwear or grippy socks and toileting programs. The resident was educated to not stand up by himself. Resident was upset with nurse stating he was not in a concentration camp. The nurse reminded the resident that he was in rehabilitation for his broken hip and the facility has safety regulations. The nurse reminded him about his falls. The 3/27/23 fall assessment documented at 8:56 p.m. documented the resident told the nurse he was trying to get to the wheelchair from his bed. He was found on his knees in his room. The nurse's progress note on 3/27/23 at 9:55 p.m. documented the resident sustained a skin tear to the left outer forearm. The nurse's progress note on 3/28/23 at 7:00 a.m. documented "the resident was very confused throughout the night. He was alert and oriented to self only. Resident had three falls since 8:00 p.m. last evening. The resident vacillated from very agitated and lethargic. When awake and restless (sic) and agitated, he continues to take off his clothes and attempting to grab staff and get up. Temperature started at 99.8 degrees F and went up to 100.2 degrees F. Tylenol was provided. Resident assisted to chair and back to bed but has remained unsafe and closely monitory. Heart rate was tachycardia but regular. Provider was notified after first fall and again this morning with orders to send to emergency room to evaluate and treat." The nurse's progress note on 3/28/23 at 9:54 a.m. documented "called hospital emergency room for resident's disposition. Resident is being admitted for altered mental status, generalized abdominal pain, urinary retention, blood in urine, urinary tract infection, elevated white blood cells, elevated potassium of 7."-The care plan revealed the following interventions were added: sent to ER for evaluation on 3/28/23, room rearranged related to falls and purposeful rounding. -The facility failed to put effective interventions into place to prevent Resident #16 from continued falls. C. Staff interviewsLicensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 was interviewed on 4/17/23 at 11:53 a.m. He said purposeful rounding was to go to the resident's door say hello and seeing if the resident needed anything. The nurse would see if the resident was in distress or pain. LPN #1 was unable to answer how often purposeful rounding should be completed. CNA #3 was interviewed on 4/17/23 at 11:48 a.m. She said purposeful rounding was to check on all residents every 60-90 minutes. She said she did not know what purposeful rounding was if a resident had an intervention. She stated the toileting program was to check on the resident every two hours to see if they needed incontinence assistance. A copy of the facility's purposeful rounding policy was requested on 4/17/23. The clinical services manager (CSM) #1 did not have a policy. She provided a presentation on purposeful rounding. -The presentation did not state what the frequency of rounding should be when ordered. Admission coordinator (AC) #1 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 11:58 a.m. She said she notified the nurse and therapists when a new resident was a high fall risk. She stated new residents identified as a fall risk should have maximum assistance, have a sling in the room and be close to the nurse's station. The fall risk was communicated through email to all disciplines and the admission coordinator would give a report in person. III. Resident #33A. Resident observationsOn 4/12/23 at 1:24 p.m., the resident sat in a wheelchair in her room. She had a bandage on her left lower extremity (shin). The bandage was dated 4/12/23. B. Family interviewAn interview was conducted with the resident's daughter on 4/12/23 at 1:24 p.m. She said on 4/2/23, the resident hit her left shin on a metal part of her wheelchair while she was in the bathroom with a staff member. The resident received a skin tear to her left shin. C. Resident statusResident #33, age 92, was admitted on 1/17/23. According to the April 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, history of falling, lack of coordination, chronic kidney disease stage 3, malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the breast, history of sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, frontal lobe and executive function deficit. The 1/23/23 facility assessment, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 with no behaviors. The resident required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers (two plus staff physical assist), dressing, eating, toileting (two plus staff physical assist), and personal hygiene. The resident had functional limitations in range of motion impairment on both sides of her lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, or foot). The resident had occasional moderate pain that did limit her day to day activities. D. Record reviewCare plan for a skin tear was started on 2/23/23. The pertinent interventions included for staff to apply dressings according to physician and wound care team orders. Staff were to consult with the facility wound care team to follow and guide the resident's treatment. Staff were to report signs of cellulitis (localized pain, redness/swelling/tenderness/drainage, fever); sepsis (fever/malaise/change in mental status, tachycardia/hypotension, nausea/vomiting); osteomyelitis (pain/redness/swelling, muscle spasms, fever). Wound care would be managed by a hospital wound clinic, facility wound care team and the resident's family. Event report by licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 dated 2/20/23 at 8:45 a.m., revealed to monitor a skin tear to the resident's left lower extremity (shin) related to contact with her wheelchair footplates upon transferring. The skin tear was vertical measuring 2 centimeters (cm) on the left lower shin. There was no pain associated with the skin tear and no signs or symptoms of infection. Staff were to monitor the skin tear daily for any change in condition. -The resident's physician and family representative were not notified. Wound note dated 2/23/23 at 8:30 a.m., by a registered nurse (RN)revealed skin tear/laceration to the left shin. The wound bed had granulated and epithelial tissue with heavy sanguineous (blood) exudate. The surrounding skin was bruised. Resident reported no pain to the area. Resident was at baseline for movement, strength, sensation, temperature and edema (water retention) for the extremity wound. Physician order dated 2/23/23 revealed a skin tear to the left middle shin. Wound care team to cleanse with saline or wound cleanser, pat dry, apply xeroform (cut to fit) followed by foam dressing every other day and as needed.-After the resident obtained the skin tear on 2/20/23, there was no subsequent education with staff or preventative measures put in place to prevent recurrence. E. Staff interviewsThe assistant director or nursing (ADON) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 8:40 a.m. He said the resident's lower extremity wound occurred when her left was bumped on her wheelchair during a transfer by staff. The wound nurse (WN) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 12:10 p.m. She said on 2/20/23 from a skin tear that occurred during a transfer with staff. She said a staff member was transferring the resident and her shin came into contact with the wheelchair pedals that were folded up and to the sides of the wheelchair. She said she felt this was an accident and the transfer was completed according to facility policy. She acknowledged that there was no evidence the resident's family nor her physician were notified of the incident on 2/20/23 and they should have been notified. LPN #1 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 2:46 p.m. He said he was told by a certified nurse aide (CNA) that the resident had hit her shin on the wheelchair foot pedals. He said the food pedals were flipped up and she nicked her shin on the metal. He said it was a small skin tear and she did have some edema at the time. He said it was bleeding a little at the time. He said he could not remember if he notified the resident's family or physician. He said for changes of condition, falls, head injuries and unwitnessed falls the family and physician should be notified.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
1. How the corrective action will be accomplished for identified affected individuals. a. On 4/27/23 #53, #16, and #33 were all assessed for fall risk and accident prevention measures. This included reviewing care plans, individual John Hopkins assessments and fall prevention interventions, Braden assessments and skin breakdown interventions including prevention of skin tears. i. #53 has had no falls/accidents since 4/4/23 ii. #16 discharged the facility 3/28/23 iii. #33 has had no falls/accidents (skin tears) since 4/13/23 2. How will other individuals with the potential to be affected or in similar situations be identified and protected? a. On 4/27/23 an audit of current residents with a Braden score of high risk was completed by Nurse Managers to ensure interventions are in place to prevent skin breakdown including skin tears/bruising. i. 100% of residents (76) were audited. 15 residents were identified with a high-risk Braden assessment. Of those, 13 residents had effective interventions. 2 of those residents had their care plans updated. 1. MR#:?10435-01–Interventions updated. 2. MR#10440-01: Interventions updated. Resident d/c 5/3 b. On 4/27/23 an audit of current residents with extensive staff assistance for bed/chair mobility was completed by Nurse Mangers to ensure interventions are in place to prevent skin alterations/breakdown. i. 100% of residents (76) were audited. 30 residents were identified to need extensive staff assistance with bed/chair mobility. Of those, 29 residents had appropriate interventions in place and did not have any updates. 1 of those residents had new interventions put into place and added to the resident care plan. 1. MR#:?10435-01-Updated interventions c. On 4/27/23 an audit of current residents with high fall risk noted from their individual John Hopkins assessment was completed by Nurse Managers to ensure interventions are in place to prevent falls or accidents. i. 100% of residents (76) were audited. 33 residents were identified to be high fall risk as identified by the John Hopkins individual assessment. Of those, 28 residents had effective interventions in place and did not have any updates. 5 of those residents had new interventions put into place and added to the resident care plan. 1. MR#:?9734-03-Updated interventions 2. MR#10397-01-Updated interventions. 3. MR#10002-Updated interventions 4. MR#10088-Updated interventions 5. MR#10305-Updated interventions 3. Systemic changes will ensure that the deficient practice will not recur. a. Policies reviewed by Nurse Manager team and given to all nursing staff to review on 4/27/23. b. Education provided to all nursing staff on 4/27/23 by SDC and DON (Director of Nurses) to include fall prevention implementation utilizing the yellow safety program for frequent fallers and high fall risk resident identified on admission or with a change of condition. c. Education provided to all staff on 4/27/23 by SDC and DON on yellow safety program guidelines. d. Education provided to all nursing staff on 4/27/23 by SDC and DON to include ways to maintain skin integrity to prevent skin tears and bruising. e. Process changes i. In depth the IDT meeting started to review falls extensively including med changes, new and current interventions, vital signs, care plans and RCA (Root Cause Analysis). 1. Therapy Director, Social Services Director, neighborhood social worker, Director of Nursing, MDS coordinator/Nurse Manager, Wound care nurse/Nurse Manager, Restorative Nurse Manager, Dietician, Activities Director, and Nursing Home Administrator will attend. CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) will attend fall discussion when able. 4. How the facility will monitor its corrective actions/performance a. Nurse Managers will audit all new admissions and any resident with a change of status daily to identify a high John Hopkins score. These daily audits will be completed for 1 month. If no concerns are identified a nurse manager will audit three random admissions and/or change of status per week for 2 months. b. Nurse Managers will audit all new admissions and any resident with a change of status daily to identify a high skin risk assessment. These daily audits will be completed for 1 month. If no concerns are identified a nurse manager will audit three random admissions and/or change of status per week for 2 months. c. Audits conducted by Nurse Managers will be submitted and reviewed weekly by the DON. DON will implement any changes at the time of the review as applicable. DON will summarize these audits and present monthly in QAA meeting for further review and recommendations. 5. When will corrective action be accomplished? 4/27/23
4/18/2023Recertification Survey · ID LVBC113 deficiencies
0000Initial CommentsSurveyor note2 building records
Findings · record 1 of 2
A recertification survey was completed from 4/12/23 to 4/18/23. Three deficiencies were cited.
Findings · record 2 of 2
An Emergency Preparedness survey was conducted from 4/12/23 to 4/18/23. No deficiencies were cited.
Plan of correction
The state did not require a plan of correction for this citation.
0580Notify of Changes (Injury/Decline/Room, etc.)S/S E
Findings
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his/her authority, the resident's representative when there was a change of condition for three (#33, #59 and #64) of eight residents out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician and/or the resident's legal representative related to:-Resident #33's skin tear to the left lower extremity;-Resident #59's falls on 1/26/23 and 2/27/23; and,-Resident #64's falls on 2/20/23 and 3/9/23. Findings include:I. Facility policy and proceduresThe Change of Condition with Resident policy, revised on 7/7/22, was provided by the clinical services manager (CSM) #1 on 4/18/23 at 12:42 p.m. The policy revealed a change of condition with a resident was a multi-disciplinary approach and might be observed by any member of the team. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) reviewed residents routinely and might identify a change of condition. The IDT should monitor residents on-going, for a change of condition/change in status. Upon identification of a change of condition, an event will be opened in (charting program) and interventions implemented immediately. The registered nurse (RN) or the licensed practical nurse (LPN) was responsible for notifying the provider and the resident's power of attorney (POA) of a significant change of condition. Documentation of notification should be made in the medical record. Except in a medical emergency, a resident should not be transferred or discharged, or his/her treatment radically altered without consultation with the resident/POA and the provider. II. Resident #64A. Resident statusResident #64, age 86, was admitted on 1/31/23. According to the April 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (altered mental status), cognitive communication deficit, history of falling, permanent atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, presence of cardiac pacemaker, frontal lobe and executive function deficit. The 4/1/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of four out of 15 with no behaviors. The resident required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility and dressing. The resident required limited staff assistance for transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. B. Record reviewCare plan for falls related to the resident's history of falls, decreased mobility, decreased balance and lack of understanding of surroundings was initiated on 1/31/23. The pertinent interventions were staff to provide ongoing education to use call light for assistance prior to getting out of bed or off the toilet. Ensure the resident was wearing eyeglasses. Ensure the floor was free of glare, liquids, and foreign objects. Encourage the resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips and hand rails. Provide the resident verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance and encourage the resident to assume a standing position slowly. Provide the resident with proper and well-maintained footwear. If falls occur, analyze the resident's falls to determine the pattern/trend. Ensure the call light, personal items and frequently used items were within reach. Provide the resident an environment free of clutter. Staff were to orient the resident when there has been new furniture placement or other changes in environment. Staff were to provide the resident with assistance as needed for activities of daily living and mobility. Staff were to provide toileting assistance. C. Fall on 2/20/23Event report revealed an unwitnessed fall on 2/20/23 at 6:00 p.m., in his room. The resident did not exhibit or complain of pain related to the fall. There were no signs of injury. The resident was able to perform ranges of motion on all extremities without limitations or pain. There was no observed rotation, deformity or shortening of extremities. The resident was alert and oriented at times two. The resident had a history of falls, movement problems or unsteady gait and an orthopedic condition. -The resident's physician and legal representative were not notified. The post fall investigation revealed the resident had a fall on 2/20/23 at 6:00 p.m. The resident was found lying on the floor in front of his recliner and said he was trying to go to bed. There were no observed injuries. The wound nurse (WN) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:40 a.m. She acknowledged the resident's family nor physician were notified of the resident's fall on 2/20/23. She said they both should have been notified about the fall. E. Fall on 3/9/23The family interview was conducted on 4/12/23 at 2:23 p.m. The daughter of the resident said the resident fell while going to the bathroom during the night of 3/9/23 and the facility staff did not notify them. She said she learned about the fall from the resident's physician the next day on 3/10/23 at 9:30 a.m. She said the resident fell and hit his head on the corner of the in room sink. She said the resident had a contusion to the back of his head, a bruise on his forehead, a bruise on the back of his neck and his left knee was hurting. She said he was sent to the hospital emergency department according to their request. Event report dated 3/9/23 at 11:15 p.m., revealed the resident had an unwitnessed fall at 9:55 p.m., in his room. The resident did not exhibit or complain of pain related to the fall. The resident's ranges of motion for all extremities were without any limitations or pain. There was no rotation, deformity or shortening of the extremities. The resident was alert and oriented at times one. The resident had a history of falling. The safety measures at the time of the fall were to ensure the call light (paddle) was in reach, bed in lowest position, walker, wheelchair and non-slip socks. -The resident's physician and legal representative were not notified. Fall investigation revealed on 3/9/23 at 9:55 p.m., the resident had an unwitnessed fall. A certified nurse aide (CNA) heard the resident fall and found him on the floor in his room. The resident wore regular socks. The resident said he was leaving. The resident had a hematoma to the base of the skull, minor injury of a skin tear or major bruise depending on the hospital's evaluation. The resident was educated on the use of the all light. Nurse note dated 3/10/23 at 10:24 a.m., by a RN revealed the resident's physician was notified the resident had a fall overnight. The resident was unable to bear weight on his left knee and was walking yesterday. The resident had a hematoma to the base of his skull and was going to the hospital for evaluation. Hospital note dated 3/10/23 at 11:12 a.m., revealed no acute osseous abnormality or intracranial processes. There was ecchymosis (contusion or bruise) to the occiput. There was no discomfort elicited upon the range of motion of the left knee or hip. The resident reported tenderness on palpation to the proximal aspect of the left femur and the lateral aspect of the proximal portion of left tibia/fibula. The WN was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:40 a.m. She acknowledged the resident's family was not notified of the resident's fall on 3/9/23. She said the resident's family should have been notified immediately due to his head injury and subsequent delayed transportation to the hospital emergency department. She acknowledged the resident's physician was not notified until 3/10/23 at 10:24 a.m. She acknowledged the resident's physician should have been notified immediately due to the resident's head injury. III. Resident #33A. Resident statusResident #33, age 92, was admitted on 1/17/23. According to the April 2023 CPO, diagnoses included need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, history of falling, lack of coordination, chronic kidney disease stage 3, malignant neoplasm of the breast, history of sepsis (infection), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, frontal lobe and executive function deficit. The 1/23/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 with no behaviors. The resident required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers (two plus staff physical assist), dressing, eating, toileting (two plus staff physical assist), and personal hygiene. The resident had functional limitations in range of motion impairment on both sides of her lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, or foot). The resident had occasional moderate pain that did limit her day to day activities. B. Record reviewEvent report by licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 dated 2/20/23 at 8:45 a.m., revealed to monitor a skin tear to the resident's left lower extremity (shin) related to contact with her wheelchair footplates upon transferring. The skin tear was vertical measuring 2 centimeters (cm) on the left lower shin. There was no pain associated with the skin tear and no signs or symptoms of infection. Staff were to monitor the skin tear daily for any change in condition. -The resident's physician and family representative were not notified. Care plan for a skin tear was started on 2/23/23. The pertinent interventions included for staff to apply dressings according to physician and wound care team orders. Staff were to consult with the facility wound care team to follow and guide the resident's treatment. Staff were to report signs of cellulitis (localized pain, redness/swelling/tenderness/drainage, fever); sepsis (fever/malaise/change in mental status, tachycardia/hypotension, nausea/vomiting); osteomyelitis (pain/redness/swelling, muscle spasms, fever). Wound care would be managed by a hospital wound clinic, facility wound care team and the resident's family. C. Staff interviewThe WN was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 12:15 p.m. She acknowledged the resident's family nor physician were notified of the skin tear to the resident's left lower extremity on 2/20/23. She said they both should have been notified about the skin tear. IV. Resident #59A. Resident statusResident #59, age 78, was admitted on 7/1/22. According to the April 2023 CPO, diagnoses included dementia, depression, lack of coordination, attention/concentration deficit, symbolic dysfunctions, history of falling, muscle weakness, frontal lobe and executive function deficit. The 2/16/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15 with no behaviors. The resident required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. B. Record reviewCare Plan for falls related to the resident's history of falls, decreased mobility, decreased balance and poor decision making was revised on 2/20/23. The pertinent interventions were to ensure the resident wore the proper anti-slip footwear, educate the resident to call staff prior to getting up independently and for the maintenance staff to assess for anti-roll back mechanism on the wheel chair. Ensure the resident's bathroom was free of clutter, and the light in the bathroom was tested and worked appropriately. Keep the resident's bed in the lowest position. Ensure the resident was wearing glasses. Ensure the floor was free of glare, liquids, and foreign objects. Encourage the resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, and handrails. Provide the resident with verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance and encourage the resident to assume a standing position slowly. If falls occurred, analyze the resident's falls to determine pattern/trend. Ensure the call light, personal items and frequently used items were within reach. Staff were to provide the resident an environment free of clutter. Staff were to orient the resident when there has been new furniture placement or other changes in environment. Staff were to provide assistance as needed for activities of daily living and mobility. Staff were to provide toileting assistance. C. Fall on 1/6/23Event report revealed on 1/6/23 at 6:45 p.m., the resident had a witnessed fall in their room. The resident said "I fell backwards cause my legs got wobbly." The resident was being transferred with staff assistance. The resident was able to move all extremities without pain. There was no observed rotation, deformity of the extremities. The safety measures that were in use at time of fall were the resident's bed was in the lowest position, paddle call light in reach, gait belt, shoes, and wheelchair.-The resident's physician and family representative were not notified of the fall. The post fall investigation for the fall on 1/6/23 at 6:45 p.m., revealed the resident was assisted to the bathroom, the resident's legs became weak and gave out from under her. The fall was witnessed and the resident hit the back of her head during the fall. The resident had slight pain to the area, and no other injuries were noted. The WN was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:05 a.m. She acknowledged the resident's family nor physician were notified of the resident's fall on 1/6/23. She said they both should have been notified about the fall. D. Fall on 2/27/23Event report revealed on 2/27/23 at 5:40 p.m., the resident had an unwitnessed fall with no injuries in the resident's room. The resident said "I was trying to get in the wheelchair and slipped." Prior to fall, the resident was sleeping in bed. The resident did not exhibit or complain of pain related to the fall. The resident was able to move all extremities without pain. There was no observed rotation or deformity of the extremities. The resident had a history of falls. The safety measures that were in use at time of fall were the resident's bed was in the lowest position, paddle call light in reach, cane, gait belt, low bed, shoes, walker and wheelchair. -The resident's physician and family representative were not notified of the fall. The WN was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:05 a.m. She acknowledged the resident's family nor physician were notified of the resident's fall on 2/27/23. She said they both should have been notified about the fall. V. Administrative interviewCSM #1 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 12:40 p.m. She said a resident's family and physician should be notified if a resident experienced a change of condition, falls or pressure ulcers.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
1. How the corrective action will be accomplished for identified affected individuals. a. Resident #33 skin tear to LLE- i. Per floor LPN family was at bedside on 2/20/23 when this incident occurred. On 4/25/23 family was notified of the status of LLE ST by Wound care RN. A family care conference was held on 4/27/23 by the social services team and the Wound care RN. Pro Health MD was notified and treated skin tear to LLE on 3/9/23. b. Resident #59s falls on 1/26/23 and 2/27/23 i. There is no fall for resident #59 on 1/26/23 ii. The nurse manager called to ensure the family was notified of falls for 1/6/2023 and 2/27/23. Multiple attempts made without call back. Fall investigation form checked that notification had occurred at the time of fall. Medical Director was notified of the fall on 4/18/23. c. Resident #64 falls on 2/20/23 and 3/9/23 i. Resident discharged from facility 4/13/23. 2. How will other individuals with the potential to be affected or in similar situations be identified and protected? a. On 4/27/23 all skin tear and fall events were audited to determine if the resident’s physician and family were notified. i. 4 open fall events were audited. The resident's family was notified of all 4 fall events. The provider was notified of 3 out of the 4 fall events. ii. 7 open skin tear events were audited. The resident’s family and provider were not notified of any of the 7 events. 3. Systemic changes will ensure that the deficient practice will not recur. a. Education was completed by SDC on 4/27/23 to all nurses to ensure that families and providers are notified of any events and/or changes of condition and documented in the resident medical record. 4. How the facility will monitor its corrective actions/performance a. 10 event audits will be completed weekly by Nurse Managers to determine if the family and provider was notified and documented appropriately. These audits will be completed for 1 month. If no concerns are identified, nurse managers will audit 5 events weekly for 2 months. b. Audits conducted by Nurse Managers will be submitted and reviewed weekly by the DON (Director of Nurses). DON will implement any changes at the time of the review as applicable. DON will summarize these audits and present monthly in QAA meeting for further review and recommendations. 5. When will corrective action be accomplished? 4/27/23
0684Quality of CareS/S E
Findings
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#18 and #16) residents out of 32 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #18 and Resident #16 were administered medications according to the physician's orders. Findings include:I. Facility policy The Medication and Treatment policy, revised 6/23/22, was provided by the clinical nurse consultant (CNC) #1 on 4/18/23 at 11:55 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, "all medications and treatments will be administered with a provider order in a timely manner. If an order cannot be followed, the provider will be notified and the situation will be documented in the resident order."Timely administration of medications/treatments means the medication/treatment is administered as close to the scheduled time as possible. One hour before or after the schedule time or range is acceptable. Ideally, medications are administered at the time scheduled; if unable, reasoning will be documented."Residents have the right to refuse medications/treatments. If a resident refuses a medication/treatment, the following will occur. After the nurse's assessment of refusal, if it is determined that the medication/treatment being refused has the ability to cause a significant adverse event, the provider will be notified by midnight of the next calendar day.""If there is a pattern of refusal (three consecutive refusals) the provider and the responsible party shall be notified. The type and purpose of the medication/treatment shall be taken into consideration and nursing judgment shall be used." II. Resident #18 A. Resident status Resident #18, age 79, was admitted on 10/17/22. According to the April 2023 computerized physician order (CPO), the diagnoses include Alzheimer's, type two diabetes, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, congestive heart failure and syncope. The 1023/223 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 10 out of 15. She required two person assistance with transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. B. Record review The April 2023 CPO physician orders revealed: - Cinacalcet 30mg (milgrams) once a day for hyperparathyroidism (parathyroid gland overactive) secondary to chronic renal failure with dialysis, start on 1/25/23. The November 2022 medication administration record (MAR) showed the following medications were not administered per physician orders:On 11/12/22 Cincalcet 30mg was not administered as resident refused. The December 2022 MAR showed the following medications were not administered per physician orders:On 12/17/22, 12/23/22 and 12/29/22, Cincalcet 30mg was not administered as resident refused. The January 2023 MAR showed the following medications were not administered per physician orders:On 1/2/23, 1/4/23, 1/6/23, 1/13/23 and 1/16/23, Cincalcet 30mg was not administered as resident refused. The February 2023 MAR showed the following medications were not administered per physician orders:On 2/1/23, 2/2/23, 2/8/23, 2/12/23, 2/20/23, 2/22/23 and 2/28/23 Cincalcet 30mg was not administered as resident refused. The March 2023 MAR showed the following medications were not administered per physician orders:On 3/8/23, 3/14/23, 3/15/23, 3/21/23, 3/24/23 and 3/31/23 Cincalcet 30mg was not administered as resident refused. The April 2023 MAR showed the following medications were not administered per physician orders:On 4/7/23, 4/8/23, 4/9/23 and 4/10/23 Cincalcet 30mg was not administered as resident refused. The progress notes revealed that on 4/7/23 the dialysis center notified the facility that there was a concern for intact parathyroid hormone levels. The resident's level was 2,819 with a goal range of 160 to 720. It documented the resident was on cinacalcet 30 mg. -The Cinacalcet medication was used to produce less parathyroid hormone. There was an event created on 4/11/23 to monitor for medication refusals, document interventions and effectiveness. There was no documentation under the notification section of the event that the provider was notified. III. Resident #16 A. Resident status Resident #16, age 61, was admitted on 3/11/23 and discharged on 3/28/23. According to the March 2023 CPO, the diagnoses include end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, kidney transplant, history of infections of the central nervous system-cryptococcal meningitis, history of sepsis (infection) and bacteremia (bacteria in bloodstream), pseudomonas (infection), type two diabetes and encephalopathy (altered mental status). The 3/17/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15. He required one person assistance with transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. B. Record review The March 2023 CPO physician orders: -Eliquis 5mg twice a day for deep vein thrombosis, start on 3/11/23. -Insulin glargine solution 100 unit/mL 10 units twice a day for type two diabetes, start on 3/11/23.-Prednisone 5mg once a day in the morning for kidney failure, start on 3/11/23. -Vancomycin 125 mg twice a day for c-difficile prophylaxis, start on 3/14/23. The March 2023 MAR showed the following medications were not administered per physician orders:-3/15/23 Eliquis 5mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note documented the resident was at dialysis.-3/17/23 Eliquis 5mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note documented the resident was at dialysis.-3/15/23 Insulin glargine solution 100 unit/mL was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note documented the resident was at dialysis.-3/17/23 Insulin glargine solution 100 unit/mL was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note documented the resident was at dialysis.-3/15/23 Prednisone 5mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note did not give any additional information. -3/17/23 Prednisone 5mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note documented the resident was at dialysis.- 3/15/23 Vancomycin 125mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note documented the resident was at dialysis. - 3/17/23 Vancomycin 125mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note did not give any additional information. -3/20/23 Vancomycin 125mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note did not give any additional information. -3/22/23 Vancomycin 125mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. the progress note documented the resident was at dialysis. -3/24/23 Vancomycin 125mg was not administered as resident was unavailable. The progress note did not give any additional information. -There was no documentation in the resident's medical record that indicates the physician was notified when the prescribed medications were not administered. IV. Interviews Licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 for Resident #16 and #18 was interviewed on 4/18/223 at 10:35 a.m. He said that if a resident did not receive medication, the doctor should be notified. The charge nurse (CN) #2 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:40 a.m. She stated that if a resident has dialysis, the time should be readjusted so the resident receives the medication before or after dialysis. If a resident refused, it was the resident's right to refuse. She would educate the resident and call the family. For Resident #18, she stated they would call the husband to help encourage the resident to take the medication and the charge nurse would review. The assistant director of nursing (ADON) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:51 a.m. He said that if a medication was not administered, it should be noted in the chart and the charge nurse should be notified. If the resident was at dialysis, the timing should be readjusted so the resident gets the medication before leaving for dialysis. If the resident refused and there was a pattern, an event should be opened. When an event was opened, that would trigger notifying the provider.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
How the corrective action will be accomplished for identified affected individuals. -The Medical Director was notified of medication refusals for resident #18 4/18/23 -The Medical Director was notified of medications not administered due to resident unavailable at dialysis for #16 on 4/18/23. How will other individuals with the potential to be affected or in similar situations be identified and protected? -On 4/27/23 nurse managers audited all residents to determine if a pattern of refusals or a pattern of medications held was identified and the provider was notified. -There were 10 residents that had a pattern of medication refusals. Of those, 2 residents had an event opened to monitor refusals and had providers notified. The other 8 did not have documentation that the provider was notified. Education was complete for these refusals. Systemic changes will ensure that the deficient practice will not recur. -Education was completed by the SDC on 4/27/23 to all nurses to ensure they are notifying the provider with any pattern of medication refusals. Nurses were also educated on the importance of giving all medications as ordered by the provider instead of documenting resident unavailable. -Charge nurses will now monitor medication compliance weekly. -IDT members will review all Expressions of Needs events weekly. How the facility will monitor its corrective actions/performance -Nurse managers will perform weekly audits of 30 residents to determine if a pattern of refusals was identified, and the provider was notified. These audits will be completed for 1 month. If no concerns are identified, nurse managers will perform weekly audits of 15 residents for 2 months. -Audits conducted by Nurse Managers will be submitted and reviewed weekly by the DON (Director of Nurses). DON will implement any changes at the time of the review as applicable. DON will summarize these audits and present monthly in QAA meeting for further review and recommendations. When will corrective action be accomplished? 4/27/23
0689Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/DevicesS/S G
Findings
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (#53, #16 and #33) of eight residents reviewed for accidents out of 32 sample residents received adequate supervision to prevent an accident/hazard. Resident #53 was known to be at risk for falls on admission as he had fallen at home. The facility failed to implement effective interventions. The resident fell two times on 2/17/23, with the first fall resulting in a head wound with active bleeding where the resident was sent to the emergency department for treatment and the head wound was glued. Observations revealed fall interventions were not implemented. In addition, the facility failed to:-Implement effective fall interventions for Resident #16; and, -Implement interventions when Resident #33 obtained a skin tear during a transfer to prevent it from occurring again. Findings include:I. Resident #53A. Facility policy and procedure The Skilled Nursing Facility Fall Management policy and procedure, revised on 2/8/23, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/13/23 at 4:52 p.m. It read in pertinent part: "Residents have a right to a safe environment, while maximizing their independence. Fall prevention seeks to balance resident's safety from falls while respecting individual rights and preservation of dignity. It is the facility's goal to reduce falls and injury related falls. "Admitting Nurse will complete the Fall Risk Observation upon admission. Individualized interventions will be implemented to minimize potential fall occurrence dependent upon the resident's risk. "Additional interventions for residents identified to be at greater risk: anticipate needs by observing normal routines and times of increased risk, obtain consults as appropriate, encourage adequate rest periods to prevent over tiring, and increase staff observation and avoid self isolation. Encourage inclusion in activities and social interaction." The Fall Prevention Philosophy, dated 2/1/23, was received by the clinical nurse consultant on 4/18/23 at 11:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part:"Call lights: We strive to meet each resident's needs prior to them having to use their call light. If a call light is used, it will be answered promptly and courteously by the first available staff person. "Purposeful rounding is rounding routinely to meet the resident's needs before they ask, is proactive rather than reactive, prevents falls and other injuries, takes less time than answering call lights, and is done by all nursing department staff."With each round offer toileting/check incontinence products, reposition for comfort, offer, encourage, and assist with fluids, ask about pain or discomfort, ask if there are any personal items they need or an activity they would like to participate in. Look at the environment: ensure call lights are in reach, ensure water is available and in reach, and ensure the room is free of clutter and a neat appearance."B. Resident statusResident #53, age 87, was admitted on 10/8/22. According to the April 2023 computerized physician order (CPO), the diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, repeated falls, unspecified dementia, traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding inside the skull) with loss of consciousness, attention and concentration deficit, cognitive communication deficit and frontal lobe and executive function deficit. The 4/3/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of three out of 15. He required extensive assistance of two persons for dressing and toileting, extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility and transfers, and extensive assistance of one for personal hygiene and the supervision of one person for eating. The resident was also identified to be at high risk for falls. C. Resident representative interviewThe resident was not interviewable due to his cognitive communication deficit. The resident's spouse was interviewed on 4/12/23 at 11:34 a.m. She said she was with the resident all the time because she was responsible for all choices/decisions regarding the resident's care. She stated the resident had problems understanding things. She said he fell at home in the bathroom and hit his head that caused his brain to bleed. She said after she was admitted to the facility. She said the resident had been different ever since the fall, he had a poor memory and could not carry a conversation. She said she encouraged the resident to press the call light but he did not remember and the call light was always within his reach when he was sitting in the wheelchair. She said she had concerns the resident had fallen out of his wheelchair during the night. She said the staff were not consistent with rounding, it depended who was working and varied everyday. D. ObservationsOn 4/12/23 at 2:49 p.m. the resident was in his wheelchair in his room without the call light within reach. The resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses. The resident had heel protectors on his feet that were resting on foot rests with no non-skid footwear. On 4/13/23 at approximately 9:00 a.m. to 10:05 a.m. the resident was observed in his room sitting in a wheelchair, he was dozing and abruptly woke up and cried out for his wife to take him home. No staff member entered the resident's room during that time period. The resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses, or non-skid footwear on both feet. The call light was hanging over the right armrest of the wheelchair resting on the floor. On 4/18/23 at 8:22 a.m. to 8:32 a.m. the resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses. At 9:29 a.m. the resident was yelling for help. A certified nurse assistant (CNA) arrived and attempted to calm the resident. The resident was not wearing his prescribed glasses. The call light was on his bed and the CNA tucked the call light between the gel seat cushion and left side of the wheelchair before exiting the room. At 12:42 p.m. the resident was sitting in the wheelchair in his room without a call light within reach.-The resident was not able to consistently use the call light (see family interview) and it was not placed properly for use, did not have his glasses on and often did not wear non-skid footwear. E. Record reviewThe resident was admitted to the hospital from 9/28/23 to 10/3/22 status post fall at home resulting in subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), an 8th left rib fracture, increase in impaired mobility and generalized weakness. Care planThe care plan, revised on 1/5/23, read in pertinent part: the resident was at risk for falls related to a history of falls, decreased mobility, decreased balance, advanced age, and weakness. Interventions start date 10/8/22 date included PT, OT consults, strength training, toning, positioning, transfer training, gait training, and mobility devices. The resident was not a candidate for rehabilitation service due to presenting symptoms and the resident's spouse opted for hospice care. The care plan dated 1/5/23 continued with: keep call light and personal items and frequently used items in reach. Provide the resident with an environment free of clutter. Orient resident when there has been new furniture placement or other changes in environment. If falls occur, analyze resident's falls to determine pattern/trend. Give resident verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance, provide resident with proper well-maintained footwear. Encourage the resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, handrails. Assure the floor is free of glare, liquids, and foreign objects. Assure the resident was wearing glasses and they were clean. Toileting program, 12/28/22, read as follows: assure the resident is sitting upright in his wheelchair. Interdisciplinary team to review medication regimen, padding to gap in bed and bed extenders, and included offer distraction measures updated on 1/31/23. Interdisciplinary team: ensure resident has proper footwear over heel protectors when up in wheelchair updated 2/21/23. Care plan after 2/21/23 included the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to complete root cause(s) of fall events and establish and recommend interventions. Falls Two fall events occurred on 2/17/23 at 7:15 p.m. and at 11:53 p.m. The fall at 7:15 p.m. was unwitnessed and occurred in the hallway as the resident stood upright from his unlocked wheelchair and fell backward hitting his posterior head against the floor. The resident reported he was trying to find his wife. The resident was last toileted at 5:30 p.m. and was incontinent of urine at the time of the fall. Neurological checks were completed on 2/17/23 from 7:15 p.m. through 9:00 p.m. The spouse and medical provider were notified of the fall. At approximately 9:55 p.m. the resident's head wound started to actively bleed and the provider ordered an emergency room evaluation and computed tomography (CT) scan which was negative. The head wound was glued closed and the resident was returned to the facility. The investigation of the fall revealed the resident was not wearing non-skid footwear. Purposeful rounding stopped at 6:45 p.m. (30 minutes before the first fall). Root cause per interdisciplinary team (IDT): Urine incontinence. Interventions: proper footwear, educate the resident on importance of using call light, rearrange room.-There was no documentation the second fall on 2/17/23 at 11:53 p.m. was investigated. A third unwitnessed fall occurred on 3/20/23 at 1:35 a.m. The resident was found on the floor at his bedside, stating he wanted to "go out." No injury noted. Neurological checks were completed immediately after the fall through 3/22/23 on the evening shift (time not documented). The resident was incontinent of urine at the time of the fall. Last toileting/brief changed at 12:30 a.m. The spouse, hospice, and the medical provider were notified. Root cause per IDT: No root cause documented. Interventions: Staff implemented fall protocol, rearrange room, place bed against wall. A fourth unwitnessed fall occurred on 4/2/23 at 8:45 p.m. The resident was found on the floor leaning against his wheelchair facing the television. No injury noted. Neurological checks were completed immediately after fall through 4/5/23 on the evening shift (time not documented). The resident was not incontinent of urine at the time of the fall. Last toileting brief change at 5:45 p.m. Wife and medical provider were notified. Root cause per IDT: Believed to be agitation. Interventions: Post Void Residual Volume (no progress note related to post void residual volume output). An assisted fall occurred on 4/4/23 at 7:00 a.m. as a certified nurse assistant (CNA) was assisting the resident with a transfer from bed to wheelchair and the resident's knees buckled. The CNA lowered the resident to the floor. No injury noted. The resident was not incontinent at the time of the assisted fall. Last toileting/brief change at 5:30 a.m. Root cause per IDT: increased weakness. Interventions: Collaborate with hospice to request physical therapy for strengthening related to comfort/fall prevention (no progress note to support collaborative practice with hospice/physical therapy). F. Staff interviewsCNA #2 was interviewed on 4/13/23 at 2:10 p.m. He said the toileting program was knowing the resident's bowel and bladder habits and taking the resident to the toilet before they were incontinent. He said he used the Kardex (an abbreviated directive) to make sure he knew when to toilet residents but said it was "way too much" when he was the only CNA on the unit. CNA #1 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 9:46 a.m. She said purposeful rounding was checking on residents every two hours to make sure they were okay and respond to their needs in a timely manner. She further explained, she was assigned to 15 residents and many were dependent on her for transfers but if she could not find help then she couldnot always round. The NHA was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 10:15 a.m. The NHA said the toileting program was located on the Kardex. The Kardex was generated every morning/evening (if needed) for the CNAs to offer toileting to residents because continence was a priority. The clinical nurse consultant (CNC) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 11:20 a.m. The CNC said purposeful rounding was focused on answering call lights. The CNC stated there was no mechanism in place to assure purposeful rounding was consistently done, and no documentation to support purposeful rounding was completed. The CNC said all nursing staff were educated on fall prevention and purposeful rounding on hire and annually. II. Resident #16A. Resident status Resident #16, age 61, was admitted on 3/11/23 and discharged on 3/28/23 to the hospital. According to the March 2023 CPO, the diagnoses include displaced fracture of left femur, subsequent closed fracture, unsteadiness on feet, pain in left hip and left knee, history of falling, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, kidney transplant, history of infections of the central nervous system-cryptococcal meningitis, history of sepsis (infection) and bacteremia (bacteria in bloodstream), pseudomonas (infection), type two diabetes and encephalopathy (altered mental status). The 3/17/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15. He required one person assistance with transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. He used a walker and a wheelchair. It indicated that he had a fracture related to a fall within the last six months. B. Record review The fall risk care plan, revised on 3/28/23, documented the resident was at risk for falling related to history of falls, decreased mobility, decreased balance and a hip fracture. The interventions included assure resident is wearing eyeglasses, assure eyeglasses are clean and in good repair, assure the floor is free of glare, liquids and foreign objects, encourage resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, hand rails,etc, keep call light and personal items within reach, occupy resident with meaningful distractions, provide assistance as needed for ADLs and mobility, provide toileting assistance/toileting plan. The initial social services progress note on 3/13/23 at 5:07 p.m. indicated that the resident was independent with all ADLs with no need of mobility. -There was no intervention in his fall risk care plan related to residents identified to be at greater risk. The activities of daily living (ADL) function status/rehabilitation potential care plan, initiated on 3/12/23, documented the resident will attain and maintain the highest practicable functional level and complications will be minimized. The interventions included providing an occupational and physical therapy evaluation, enforce weight bearing restrictions as ordered, instruct in use of assistive device and monitor for correct use, provide assistance for ADL's and mobility as needed, and teach safety measures and monitor resident's safety. The 3/13/23 fall assessment documented at 9:08 p.m. the resident told the nurse he tried to roll in the bed and fell down on the floor. The nurse's progress note on 3/13/23 at 10:11 p.m. documented "the CNA informed the nurse that they came in the patient's room to help him to bed. Patient told the CNA he can't sleep and he needs his wife or someone (sic) to sleep with (sic) him in the room. The nurse told the resident that no one can be (sic) in his room during the night. Later the resident pressed the call light many times and asked the CNA if she can stay with him. There was no documentation that the staff asked the resident if they should call his wife nor did they attempt to reach the resident's wife at nightime. The facility attempted to reach the wife on 3/14/23 at 8:55 a.m. to inform the wife of the fall at night. They were unsuccessfulin reaching the wife. They notified the son about the fall and he said he would visit the morning of 3/14/23." -There were no additional interventions added to the actual fall care plan related to the resident's need for increased supervision. The nurse's progress note on 3/21/23 at 12:09 p.m. documented the resident was asking for percocet for his pain. He has confusion at times. The 3/21/23 fall assessment documented at 8:08 p.m. the resident told the nurse that he slid out of his wheelchair and was lying on the floor at the end of the hall in front of the wheelchair. The care plan revealed the following intervention was added: encourage resident to become more involved in facility activities. The 3/22/23 fall assessment documented at 5:45 p.m. the resident told the nurse that he was trying to go to the bathroom. The CNA found the resident in between the toilet and the wall. The care plan revealed the following intervention was added: continue with PT/OT, social work to speak with family about changing room closer to nurse's station and explore post dialysis activities during peak time of confusion. The nurse's progress note on 3/22/23 at 5:30 p.m. documented the resident told the CNA that he saw a woman with a dog and was going after the dog. When asked by the nurse, resident said he was trying to go up a three to four run ladder. The nurse's progress note on 3/22/23 at 11:59 p.m. documented the resident complained of pain to whole body. The interventions used were low bed, appropriate footwear or grippy socks. The nurse's note on 3/23/23 at 2:03 p.m. documented the night shift night nurse reported that resident complained of right lower extremity pain overnight after his fall. The nurse's progress note on 3/23/23 at 2:46 a.m. documented the interventions used were purposeful rounding, appropriate footwear or grippy socks and toileting programs. The resident was educated to not stand up by himself. Resident was upset with nurse stating he was not in a concentration camp. The nurse reminded the resident that he was in rehabilitation for his broken hip and the facility has safety regulations. The nurse reminded him about his falls. The 3/27/23 fall assessment documented at 8:56 p.m. documented the resident told the nurse he was trying to get to the wheelchair from his bed. He was found on his knees in his room. The nurse's progress note on 3/27/23 at 9:55 p.m. documented the resident sustained a skin tear to the left outer forearm. The nurse's progress note on 3/28/23 at 7:00 a.m. documented "the resident was very confused throughout the night. He was alert and oriented to self only. Resident had three falls since 8:00 p.m. last evening. The resident vacillated from very agitated and lethargic. When awake and restless (sic) and agitated, he continues to take off his clothes and attempting to grab staff and get up. Temperature started at 99.8 degrees F and went up to 100.2 degrees F. Tylenol was provided. Resident assisted to chair and back to bed but has remained unsafe and closely monitory. Heart rate was tachycardia but regular. Provider was notified after first fall and again this morning with orders to send to emergency room to evaluate and treat." The nurse's progress note on 3/28/23 at 9:54 a.m. documented "called hospital emergency room for resident's disposition. Resident is being admitted for altered mental status, generalized abdominal pain, urinary retention, blood in urine, urinary tract infection, elevated white blood cells, elevated potassium of 7."-The care plan revealed the following interventions were added: sent to ER for evaluation on 3/28/23, room rearranged related to falls and purposeful rounding. -The facility failed to put effective interventions into place to prevent Resident #16 from continued falls. C. Staff interviewsLicensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 was interviewed on 4/17/23 at 11:53 a.m. He said purposeful rounding was to go to the resident's door say hello and seeing if the resident needed anything. The nurse would see if the resident was in distress or pain. LPN #1 was unable to answer how often purposeful rounding should be completed. CNA #3 was interviewed on 4/17/23 at 11:48 a.m. She said purposeful rounding was to check on all residents every 60-90 minutes. She said she did not know what purposeful rounding was if a resident had an intervention. She stated the toileting program was to check on the resident every two hours to see if they needed incontinence assistance. A copy of the facility's purposeful rounding policy was requested on 4/17/23. The clinical services manager (CSM) #1 did not have a policy. She provided a presentation on purposeful rounding. -The presentation did not state what the frequency of rounding should be when ordered. Admission coordinator (AC) #1 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 11:58 a.m. She said she notified the nurse and therapists when a new resident was a high fall risk. She stated new residents identified as a fall risk should have maximum assistance, have a sling in the room and be close to the nurse's station. The fall risk was communicated through email to all disciplines and the admission coordinator would give a report in person. III. Resident #33A. Resident observationsOn 4/12/23 at 1:24 p.m., the resident sat in a wheelchair in her room. She had a bandage on her left lower extremity (shin). The bandage was dated 4/12/23. B. Family interviewAn interview was conducted with the resident's daughter on 4/12/23 at 1:24 p.m. She said on 4/2/23, the resident hit her left shin on a metal part of her wheelchair while she was in the bathroom with a staff member. The resident received a skin tear to her left shin. C. Resident statusResident #33, age 92, was admitted on 1/17/23. According to the April 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, history of falling, lack of coordination, chronic kidney disease stage 3, malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the breast, history of sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, frontal lobe and executive function deficit. The 1/23/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 with no behaviors. The resident required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers (two plus staff physical assist), dressing, eating, toileting (two plus staff physical assist), and personal hygiene. The resident had functional limitations in range of motion impairment on both sides of her lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, or foot). The resident had occasional moderate pain that did limit her day to day activities. D. Record reviewCare plan for a skin tear was started on 2/23/23. The pertinent interventions included for staff to apply dressings according to physician and wound care team orders. Staff were to consult with the facility wound care team to follow and guide the resident's treatment. Staff were to report signs of cellulitis (localized pain, redness/swelling/tenderness/drainage, fever); sepsis (fever/malaise/change in mental status, tachycardia/hypotension, nausea/vomiting); osteomyelitis (pain/redness/swelling, muscle spasms, fever). Wound care would be managed by a hospital wound clinic, facility wound care team and the resident's family. Event report by licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 dated 2/20/23 at 8:45 a.m., revealed to monitor a skin tear to the resident's left lower extremity (shin) related to contact with her wheelchair footplates upon transferring. The skin tear was vertical measuring 2 centimeters (cm) on the left lower shin. There was no pain associated with the skin tear and no signs or symptoms of infection. Staff were to monitor the skin tear daily for any change in condition. -The resident's physician and family representative were not notified (cross-reference F580). Wound note dated 2/23/23 at 8:30 a.m., by a registered nurse (RN) revealed skin tear/laceration to the left shin. The wound bed had granulated and epithelial tissue with heavy sanguineous (blood) exudate. The surrounding skin was bruised. Resident reported no pain to the area. Resident was at baseline for movement, strength, sensation, temperature and edema (water retention) for the extremity wound. Physician order dated 2/23/23 revealed a skin tear to the left middle shin. Wound care team to cleanse with saline or wound cleanser, pat dry, apply xeroform (cut to fit) followed by foam dressing every other day and as needed.-After the resident obtained the skin tear on 2/20/23, there was no subsequent education with staff or preventative measures put in place to prevent recurrence. E. Staff interviewsThe assistant director or nursing (ADON) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 8:40 a.m. He said the resident's lower extremity wound occurred when her left was bumped on her wheelchair during a transfer by staff. The wound nurse (WN) was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 12:10 p.m. She said on 2/20/23 from a skin tear that occurred during a transfer with staff. She said a staff member was transferring the resident and her shin came into contact with the wheelchair pedals that were folded up and to the sides of the wheelchair. She said she felt this was an accident and the transfer was completed according to facility policy. She acknowledged that there was no evidence the resident's family nor her physician were notified of the incident on 2/20/23 and they should have been notified. LPN #1 was interviewed on 4/18/23 at 2:46 p.m. He said he was told by a certified nurse aide (CNA) that the resident had hit her shin on the wheelchair foot pedals. He said the food pedals were flipped up and she nicked her shin on the metal. He said it was a small skin tear and she did have some edema at the time. He said it was bleeding a little at the time. He said he could not remember if he notified the resident's family or physician. He said for changes of condition, falls, head injuries and unwitnessed falls the family and physician should be notified.
Plan of correction · submitted by the facility
1. How the corrective action will be accomplished for identified affected individuals. a. On 4/27/23 #53, #16, and #33 were all assessed for fall risk and accident prevention measures. This included reviewing care plans, individual John Hopkins assessments and fall prevention interventions, Braden assessments and skin breakdown interventions including prevention of skin tears. i. #53 has had no falls/accidents since 4/4/23 ii. #16 discharged the facility 3/28/23 iii. #33 has had no falls/accidents (skin tears) since 4/13/23 2. How will other individuals with the potential to be affected or in similar situations be identified and protected? a. On 4/27/23 an audit of current residents with a Braden score of high risk was completed by Nurse Managers to ensure interventions are in place to prevent skin breakdown including skin tears/bruising. i. 100% of residents (76) were audited. 15 residents were identified with a high-risk Braden assessment. Of those, 13 residents had effective interventions. 2 of those residents had their care plans updated. 1. MR#:?10435-01–Interventions updated. 2. MR#10440-01: Interventions updated. Resident d/c 5/3 b. On 4/27/23 an audit of current residents with extensive staff assistance for bed/chair mobility was completed by Nurse Mangers to ensure interventions are in place to prevent skin alterations/breakdown. i. 100% of residents (76) were audited. 30 residents were identified to need extensive staff assistance with bed/chair mobility. Of those, 29 residents had appropriate interventions in place and did not have any updates. 1 of those residents had new interventions put into place and added to the resident care plan. 1. MR#:?10435-01-Updated interventions c. On 4/27/23 an audit of current residents with high fall risk noted from their individual John Hopkins assessment was completed by Nurse Managers to ensure interventions are in place to prevent falls or accidents. i. 100% of residents (76) were audited. 33 residents were identified to be high fall risk as identified by the John Hopkins individual assessment. Of those, 28 residents had effective interventions in place and did not have any updates. 5 of those residents had new interventions put into place and added to the resident care plan. 1. MR#:?9734-03-Updated interventions 2. MR#10397-01-Updated interventions. 3. MR#10002-Updated interventions 4. MR#10088-Updated interventions 5. MR#10305-Updated interventions 3. Systemic changes will ensure that the deficient practice will not recur. a. Policies reviewed by Nurse Manager team and given to all nursing staff to review on 4/27/23. b. Education provided to all nursing staff on 4/27/23 by SDC and DON (Director of Nurses) to include fall prevention implementation utilizing the yellow safety program for frequent fallers and high fall risk resident identified on admission or with a change of condition. c. Education provided to all staff on 4/27/23 by SDC and DON on yellow safety program guidelines. d. Education provided to all nursing staff on 4/27/23 by SDC and DON to include ways to maintain skin integrity to prevent skin tears and bruising. e. Process changes i. In depth the IDT meeting started to review falls extensively including med changes, new and current interventions, vital signs, care plans and RCA (Root Cause Analysis). 1. Therapy Director, Social Services Director, neighborhood social worker, Director of Nursing, MDS coordinator/Nurse Manager, Wound care nurse/Nurse Manager, Restorative Nurse Manager, Dietician, Activities Director, and Nursing Home Administrator will attend. CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) will attend fall discussion when able. 4. How the facility will monitor its corrective actions/performance a. Nurse Managers will audit all new admissions and any resident with a change of status daily to identify a high John Hopkins score. These daily audits will be completed for 1 month. If no concerns are identified a nurse manager will audit three random admissions and/or change of status per week for 2 months. b. Nurse Managers will audit all new admissions and any resident with a change of status daily to identify a high skin risk assessment. These daily audits will be completed for 1 month. If no concerns are identified a nurse manager will audit three random admissions and/or change of status per week for 2 months. c. Audits conducted by Nurse Managers will be submitted and reviewed weekly by the DON. DON will implement any changes at the time of the review as applicable. DON will summarize these audits and present monthly in QAA meeting for further review and recommendations. 5. When will corrective action be accomplished? 4/27/23

Reportable Occurrences

21 records
3/22/2026Misappropriation of Property · ID 2602R209003Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 3/23/26, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a misappropriation of property event. Client (A) reported $40 missing from their room. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity conducted a search and interviews. Management offered a lockbox to help secure their valuables. Staff located $36 in the laundry and upon review of client (A)'s account showed a recent withdrawal of $36. The money was returned, and the event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 5/28/2026 · released to the public 6/4/2026.
2/6/2026Brain Injury · ID 2602R209002Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 2/7/26, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a brain injury event. Staff observed client (A) on the floor with a head injury. Client (A) was transported to the hospital for further evaluation. Diagnostic test results showed two brain bleeds, rib fracture, spinal fractures, and a skull fracture. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity conducted a post fall review, record review and interviews. The facility concluded the client got up by self without calling for assistance and fell. Safety measures were in place. Upon their return from the hospital, staff reassessed client (A)'s fall safety needs, provided education to call for staff assistance and reassessed her toileting plan. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 4/27/2026 · released to the public 5/4/2026.
12/18/2025Sexual Abuse · ID 2502R209008Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 12/18/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a sexual abuse event. Client (A) alleged she had been raped by a staff member. The alleged incident occurred several months earlier, and she was only reporting it now. Emotional support was provided. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity conducted an assessment and interviews, reviewed care needs, notified the police, and implemented two-person female care when addressing personal needs. A forensic evaluation occurred at the hospital, which did not identify any signs of sexual trauma. Staffing schedules were reviewed and staff interviewed. No assailant matching client (A)’s description could be identified. Review of physician orders for client (A)’s care needs identified two invasive treatments involving her private area were in place, which management indicated these treatments could be contributing to client (A)’s allegation of being violated. A trauma informed care plan was initiated for client (A). Treatment orders were changed to minimize invasive interventions. Client (A)’s allegation was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 2/19/2026 · released to the public 2/26/2026.
12/12/2025Misappropriation of Property · ID 2502R209007Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 12/12/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a misappropriation of property event. After client (A) transferred to the hospital, client (A)’s family reported client (A)’s air pod earphones were missing. A phone search indicated the pods were initially at the facility, and then the location changed to an apartment. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity conducted a search and interviews. With the address provided for the current location of the air pods, management reported none of the staff addresses matched that location. The missing property could not be recovered, and the person responsible was not identified. The facility reimbursed the family. A new process was implemented for securing client belongings when they are transferred out of the facility. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 2/19/2026 · released to the public 2/26/2026.
8/22/2025Death · ID 2502R209006Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 8/21/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event of death. Client (B) expired in the facility post complications associated after a choking incident. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity conducted interviews from involved staff, reviewed diet orders and care plan needs and conducted a record review. The facility indicated the client received the proper diet and assistance with his meal, which resulted in an unfortunate choking incident, comfort measures and death. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. The department review of the occurrence investigation was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe. In addition, this event has been identified for further investigation by the Department. An onsite investigation was conducted by a representative from the State agency. For results of that on-site investigation, please reference https://cdphe.colorado.gov/find-and-compare-facilities, specifically the inspection dated 9/3/25, Event ID 1D5AB1-H1.
Publication
Sent to facility 9/11/2025 · released to the public 9/18/2025.
4/28/2025Equipment Misuse · ID 2502R209005Reported on time: No
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 5/2/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported an equipment misuse event. Reportedly, staff found client (B)’s air mattress not inflated at the proper setting for pressure relief. Client (B) had recently developed an unstageable pressure ulcer and an air mattress was added to his treatment plan. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity checked the functionality of the mattress system, conducted audits on other air mattresses, and conducted a record review, wound assessment, and staff interviews. Staff indicated the setting had been altered for about three hours that day. No one could identify what happened to cause the change in the settings. There was no reported adverse finding to the current wound. The facility concluded there was no intentional misuse of equipment, and the pressure settings did not result in an adverse outcome. Educational reminders were provided to staff on the manufacturer’s guidelines with air mattresses and to continue monitoring the settings every shift. The event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was not submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 9/3/2025 · released to the public 9/10/2025.
4/17/2025Brain Injury · ID 2502R209004Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 4/18/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable brain injury event. Client (B) fell hitting her head and suffered a laceration. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity provided first aid treatment until she could be transferred to the hospital for further evaluation of uncontrolled bleeding from the head laceration. Family declined diagnostic tests at the hospital. The laceration was closed via sutures, and she returned on continued hospice services. Staff reported the client’s mental and physical status changed post fall. Her safety plan was reassessed. The facility determined the client fell when attempting to transfer self. The brain injury event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. The department review of the occurrence investigation was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe. In addition, this event has been identified for further investigation by the Department. An onsite investigation was conducted by a representative from the State agency. For results of that on-site investigation, please reference https://cdphe.colorado.gov/find-and-compare-facilities, specifically the inspection dated 6/5/25, Event ID 3BO211.
Publication
Sent to facility 7/10/2025 · released to the public 7/17/2025.
3/2/2025Brain Injury · ID 2502R209003Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS:On 3/3/25, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to help prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a brain injury event. Reportedly, client (B) fell and then experienced unresponsive episodes the following days. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity conducted post fall assessments and reassessed client (B)’s safety needs. Client (B) remained in the facility as the focus was comfort care. She transitioned to hospice services. The facility determined client (B) accidentally rolled out of bed when trying to reach her call light that had fallen on the floor. Due to neurological changes, a brain injury event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 7/23/2025 · released to the public 7/30/2025.
10/8/2024Neglect · ID 2402R209009Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 10/8/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a neglect event. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity reported staff #1 transferred client (B) with an incorrect mechanical lift resulting in a fall with upper extremity bruising. Re-education occurred with staff on reading the information sheets, mechanical lifts, and safe transfers. The facility concluded staff #1 did not utilize her resident information sheet and incorrectly transferred the client using the wrong equipment. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 3/19/2025 · released to the public 3/26/2025.
9/23/2024Death · ID 2402R209007Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 9/23/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a death event involving client (A). During the course of the investigation, the health care entity reported staff discovered the client on the floor with abnormal vital signs. This happened five hours post admission. Staff called 911, and while on the phone, the client’s vital signs ceased. He was a DNR and expired. A review of nursing notes, admission assessments and staff interviews occurred. The facility determined all policies and procedures were followed correctly. Client (A)’s medical provider concluded the death was related to his acute complex diagnoses and co-morbidities and not related to the fall. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 2/6/2025 · released to the public 2/13/2025.
8/7/2024Verbal Abuse · ID 2402R209006Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 8/7/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a verbal abuse event. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity reported client (A) made a threatening gesture toward client (B); using a fork in a stabbing motion. Staff kept the clients separated and started frequent safety checks. Client (B)’s spouse indicated the client said he was fearful. However, the facility reported he said he was fine later. Client (B) indicated client (A) had been harassing him, but due to a cognitive impairment with client (A), she could not participate in a follow up interview. Management asked client (B) not to approach client (A) and seating arrangements were changed in the dining room. The event was substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 3/25/2025 · released to the public 4/1/2025.
5/13/2024Misappropriation of Property · ID 2402R209003Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 5/13/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a misappropriation of property event. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity reported client (A) said her cellphone was missing, which could not be located. Management concluded the item was most likely misplaced in her cluttered room and could not determine that it was deliberately taken. Lock boxes are offered to clients to safeguard their valuables. Although the cell phone was still missing, the allegation of a theft event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 2/25/2025 · released to the public 3/4/2025.
5/13/2024Misappropriation of Property · ID 2402R209002Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 5/13/24, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported a misappropriation of property event. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity reported client (A) said her nightgowns were missing and she felt like someone stole them. Through follow up interviews, the client’s version changed from one missing gown to three gowns. Management conducted a search and the lost items were not found. Clients, staff and families were reminded to ensure all personal items were properly labeled. The facility was unable to determine what happened to the missing gowns or that they were deliberately taken. Management decided to reimburse for replacement gowns. The event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 2/25/2025 · released to the public 3/4/2025.
3/5/2024Neglect · ID 2402R209001Reported on time: No
Occurrence summary
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: On 03/13/2024, the healthcare entity investigated a reportable event. The facility acted appropriately to protect their clients by taking immediate protective actions, investigating the event, and implementing a plan to prevent a future recurrence. The healthcare entity reported neglect of a client. During the course of the investigation, the healthcare entity notified the police. The staff member was moved to another hall and did not work with the client. The client was assessed without skin issues. Staff and clients were interviewed, and documentation was reviewed. Education was completed with the staff member. The staff member was monitored with the provision of care and documentation. Although the staff member did not follow the policies and procedures to check and change the client every two hours, the event was not substantiated. This public occurrence summary was provided in accordance with 25-1-124, C.R.S., and was based on the report and investigation provided by the licensed healthcare entity. Department investigation of this occurrence was conducted off-site. The healthcare entity’s occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe.
Publication
Sent to facility 5/12/2025 · released to the public 5/19/2025.
11/29/2023Physical Abuse · ID 2302R209008Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:On 11/29/23, a resident in their 90’s, alleged CNA (1) provided rough care resulting in a golf ball size bruise to their left arm. The resident also alleged they were "yanked" out of bed by their wrists and had to stand while CNA (1) remade the bed. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION:The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police, physician, family, ombudsman, adult protective services and the board of nursing. The facility immediately removed CNA (1) from the schedule and blocked their profile from being able to see or request shifts at the facility. The resident was assessed and found to have a flat, purple bruise slightly larger than a golf ball to their left dorsal forearm. The resident reports CNA (1) came in with the light off, rolled them over and changed the sheets without asking. Resident states bruising occurred while CNA was rolling him. Resident stated he did not feel safe. In a follow up interview, the resident stated they had their call light on for someone to empty the urinal. The resident felt half of the liquid missed the urinal. When CNA (1) came in they said there was nothing in the urinal and then walked out of the room without saying anything more. The resident said they placed their call light on again to ask for a wet cloth for their eyes. CNA (1) came in and was "upset." CNA (1) returned and prepared to remake the resident’s bed because it was wet. The resident stated CNA (1) “yanked” him up out of bed by his wrists and had him stand while he remade the bed. The RN stated that she didn't feel CNA (1) was doing a good job and wasn't answering his call lights in a timely manner. The nurse said CNA (1) had to be notified of every light that was theirs and needed to be answered. The nurse felt CNA (1) demeanor seemed nice but made the comment that they were never coming back to the facility again. CNA (2) worked on the same floor as CNA (1) and did not report any concerns with CNA (1), except that they kept dozing off and CNA (2) had to remind them when their call lights were going off. The facility concluded the allegation of physical abuse was substantiated as met by two elements needed including the alleged assailant acting recklessly and the resident sustaining bodily injury. CNA (1) did not return to the facility. The agency orientation packet was reviewed and a process for agency shift orientation with staffing coordinator was discussed. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS:In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site review of this reportable event submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on investigative findings provided by the licensed entity to the Occurrence section of the Department. The provider reports the information submitted to the Department is accurate and complete. The occurrence report was submitted within the required timeframe. The facility/agency complied with licensing standards for conducting an internal investigation of this occurrence event and submitting a report of the findings to the Department. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence event will be reviewed by the State Agency.
8/5/2023Brain Injury · ID 2302R209007Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 8/5/23, staff found a resident lying on the floor in his room. The wheelchair was close and the brakes were unlocked. Staff observed a large egg-sized hematoma and swelling on his forehead. As he received blood thinners, the resident was transported to the emergency department for an evaluation. Diagnostic test results showed the presence of a brain bleed and pneumonia. He was admitted for treatment and monitoring. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the family, and physician. Once he was medically cleared, he returned. There were no reported changes to his baseline level of cognition or function. Staff reassessed his care and safety needs. The fall safety care plan was updated and he was added to the fall monitoring program. When reviewing the event of the fall, staff reported the resident had been sitting up in the wheelchair one hour earlier and did not call for assistance. The facility concluded the resident’s fall was not witnessed and he suffered injuries. Staff reportedly followed his plan of care at the time of the fall. Staff continued monitoring the resident per his revised plan of care until he discharged home with family on 8/10/23. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 7/29/2024 · released to the public 7/29/2024.
7/10/2023Brain Injury · ID 2302R209006Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 7/10/23, staff found a resident, in her 80s, on the floor after an unwitnessed fall. The resident struck her head and complained of pain to her posterior head, neck, right hip, and lower back. She suffered a skin tear to her elbow. First aid was provided until emergency personnel arrived. She was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. Diagnostic test results showed the findings of a subdural hematoma and no fractures. She was admitted for medical monitoring. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the family/guardian and physician. When reviewing the events of the fall, staff reported the resident attempted to transfer herself and fell. She had a history of falls and a fracture prior to her admission two days earlier. The facility reported safety interventions were in place, but the resident got up without calling for staff assistance. Once she was medically stable, she returned. Staff reassessed her safety and mobility needs. The facility concluded the resident experienced an accidental fall with a brain bleed. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 12/21/2023 · released to the public 12/21/2023.
5/27/2023Diverted Drugs · ID 2302R209005Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 5/30/23, two nurses reported suspicious findings to administration regarding documentation discrepancies and missing medications. There was a report of one nurse (1) administering as needed Oxycodone pain medications to multiple residents on multiple occasions without supporting documentation. The initial findings showed the nurse (1) administering the medication at a higher frequency than other nurses or other shifts. This nurse (1) also failed to document the administration of medications in the resident’s records. In addition, there were allegations of nursing initials being documented in the narcotic book, which did not match any current employees. Narcotic sheets had also been altered and count discrepancies were noted. Management noted this pattern with one nurse (1). Due to the suspicious findings, the facility submitted a report of alleged drug diversion by nurse (1). Three residents were involved in the findings: Resident (A) had expired on 5/2/23. Resident (B) was in his 60s and discharged home on 5/3/23. Resident (C) was in his 40s and had no cognitive deficits. The facility reported there appeared to be at least seven - 5 mg pills of oxycodone and 73 - 10 mg pills of oxycodone taken. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police. Management removed the nurse (1) from the schedule pending the investigation. This nurse had been identified in a previous drug diversion report (refer to Occurrence ID#2302R209001 for further information). Eleven pills were unaccounted for with resident (C). Despite having an order to receive 10-milligram tablets of Oxycodone four times a day, the resident (C) received nine pills one day. There was no associated entries in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Records showed resident (B) received five doses of Oxycodone one shift, and he stated he never takes more than three doses. Records showed eight pills had been subtracted from the narcotic book for resident (A); however, the MAR showed only three pills as given. Even with the findings, no residents reported having any issues with pain management. The nurse (1) denied being involved with the findings and denied taking any medications. The nurse (1) reported s/he was aware of documentation expectations when administering medications but could not account for the missing or altered documentation. The facility substantiated the allegation of Oxycodone pain medications being deliberately diverted. Management discovered documents had been altered by nurse (1) and nursing standards of practice for medication administration had not been followed. Management terminated nurse (1)’s employment and reported him/her to the Board of Nursing. New protocols were put in place for nursing staff to help with medication handling and accountability. In addition, management planned to conduct random audits with nursing staff and discontinued medications. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 12/4/2023 · released to the public 12/4/2023.
3/9/2023Neglect · ID 2302R209003Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 3/9/23, the facility filed a report of alleged staff neglect. A staff member transferred a resident into the bathtub, placed the plug and turned on the water to fill up the tub. The staff member exited the room and left the resident unattended. The resident reported she got concerned that the tub would overflow and used her foot to dislodge the plug. She called for assistance. The resident was in her 80s and required stand by assistance from staff for her mobility needs and safety. She was identified as an at-risk adult with no cognitive impairment. Per facility policy, staff should not leave residents unattended in the bath. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the family/guardian and staffing agency. A nurse assessed the resident and reported no adverse findings. The facility reported the resident expressed no fear. The staff member identified in the allegation worked for a staffing agency. The person stated they left the room to obtain supplies and left the resident in a safe position. Education was provided to the staff member regarding the supervision expectations and safety protocol. A decision was made to terminate the staff member’s work contract on this day. Although the staff member did not follow safety policy, management concluded that due to the low risk for harm, the allegation of staff neglect was unsubstantiated. Management reminded all staff on the bathing safety policy. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 10/4/2023 · released to the public 10/4/2023.
1/24/2023Diverted Drugs · ID 2302R209001Reported on time: Yes
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 01/24/23 four tablets of Ritalin were determined to be missing during a narcotic count. The medication had been prescribed for a female resident in her 70s. The medication had been discontinued. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the physician. Nurse (1) had counted narcotics with nurse (2) when s/he came onto his/her shift. The count was correct. When nurse (1) counted narcotics at the end of the shift with nurse (3), the count was off. Four tablets of Ritalin were missing. An audit of narcotics did not reveal any other discrepancies. Drug testing was ordered for the involved staff and they did not work during the investigation. The tests were negative for the nurses. The facility was not able to determine what happened to the Ritalin or if it was actually missing. Nurse managers will audit narcotic books and will do spot checks to ensure the narcotic counts are correct. A new narcotic count sheet was implemented that included an inventory of the pages/cards/bottles. The facility also implemented a stamp for the narcotic books for when staff remove discontinued narcotics. Nurses were educated on the narcotic count/destruction policy. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the agency/facility acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 8/2/2023 · released to the public 8/9/2023.
1/24/2023Diverted Drugs · ID 2302R209002Reported on time: No
Occurrence summary
DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: On 01/25/23 the facility determined three packages of oxycodone, containing thirty two tablets, were missing. The medications had been discontinued so residents were without their pain medications. FACILITY / AGENCY ACTION: The facility conducted an internal investigation and notified the police. The facility conducted an audit of all narcotics and determined no current ordered medications were missing. All medications administration staff were drug tested. The results were negative. None of the staff were allowed to work until a negative test result was received. During the investigation, inconsistencies with controlled substance book processes were identified. The facility made several changes to their processes including audits of narcotic books, spot checks of narcotic counts, a new inventory log and implementing a stamp to be used when removing discontinued narcotics. Nursing staff were educated on facility narcotic count and destruction policy. DEPARTMENT FINDINGS: In accordance with Colorado Revised Statute 25-1-124, the Department conducted an off-site investigation of this reportable event and investigative findings submitted by the agency/facility. This public summary is based on information provided by the agency/facility to the Occurrence Section of the Department and is accurate and complete at this time. Prior to the next onsite investigation of the agency/facility, this occurrence will be reviewed. The occurrence report indicated the facility/agency acted appropriately in response to this occurrence by complying with licensing standards of reporting and investigating this occurrence.
Publication
Sent to facility 8/2/2023 · released to the public 8/9/2023.