SILVER SPRINGS

Assisted Living Center | Assisted Living

Facility Information

Address 500 West Camino Encanto, Green Valley, AZ 85614
Phone 5203993620
License AL9379C (Active)
License Owner SILVER SPRINGS SUBTENANT LLC
Administrator CATHLEENE J DABNEY
Capacity 107
License Effective 3/1/2025 - 2/28/2026
Services:
5
Total Inspections
2
Total Deficiencies
2
Complaint Inspections

Inspection History

INSP-0135844

Complete
Date: 7/21/2025
Type: Modification
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-07-26

Summary:

An on-site modification inspection to reduce the level of care to personal and increase the licensed capacity was completed on July 21, 2025.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.

INSP-0136435

Complete
Date: 7/21/2025
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-09-02

Summary:

No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00108085 and 00132248 conducted on July 21, 2025.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.

INSP-0087772

Complete
Date: 8/1/2024
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2024-09-16

Summary:

An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00183356 was conducted on August 1, 2024, and the following deficiencies were cited :

Deficiencies Found: 2

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
F. A manager of an assisted living facility authorized to provide directed care services shall ensure that:
2. There is a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that meets one of the following:
a. Provides access to an outside area that:
i. Allows the resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility, and
ii. Controls or alerts employees of the egress of a resident from the facility;
Evidence/Findings:
Based on document review, observation, and interview, for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility that controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a potential elopement risk to residents.

Findings include:

1. A review of Department documentation revealed the facility was licensed for 107 directed care level beds.

2. During the inspection, the Compliance Officer observed the premises was not secured. The Compliance Officer observed the residential units open directly to the facility grounds. The Compliance Officer observed no system to alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.

3. In an interview, E1 reported the facility did not accept directed care residents and was unsure why the facility had a license for directed care.

4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the facility was authorized to provide directed care services and did not have a means to control egress or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility.

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
B. If an assisted living facility provides medication administration, a manager shall ensure that:
3. A medication administered to a resident:
b. Is administered in compliance with a medication order, and
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication administered to a resident was administered in compliance with a medication order, for two of seven resident records reviewed.

Findings include:

1. A review of R3's medical record revealed a signed medication order, dated July 22, 2024, for Trazadone 50 mg - Take 25 mg by mouth Qhs".

2. A review of R3's medical record revealed a Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated July 2024. The MAR revealed Trazadone (half tablet) 25MG was administered at 8pm and at 9pm on July 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, and 31, 2024.

3. A review of R7's medical record revealed a signed medication order, dated July 12, 2024, for "Novolog Insulin, Inject 5 units 10 minutes before lunch unless blood sugar is below 100, hold until Dinner, check blood sugar and give 5 units if above 100."

4. A review of R7's MAR dated July 2024, revealed R7 was administered 5 units of insulin, on July 21, 2024 at 4:30pm when R7's blood sugar was 97 and on July 22, 2024 at 11:30amwhen R7's blood sugar was 95. Further review revealed on July 29, 2024 R7's blood sugar was 101 and E2 held the insulin.

5. In an interview, E1 acknowledged medications had not been administered to R3 and R7 in compliance with the medication orders.

INSP-0087771

Complete
Date: 3/8/2024
Type: Compliance (Annual)
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2024-03-11

Summary:

Based on Arizona Revised Statutes, \'a736-424(B) and Arizona Administrative Code, R9-10-109(E), the Department may not conduct an onsite compliance inspection during the time of the accreditation report. The licensee submitted to the Department the current accreditation report from the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF), valid from March 9, 2021 through May 31, 2024. If the health care institution's accreditation report is not valid for the entire licensing fee period of March 1, 2024 through February 28, 2025 the Department may conduct a compliance inspection of the health care institution during the time period the department does not have a valid accreditation report for the health care institution.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.

INSP-0087770

Complete
Date: 4/17/2023
Type: Compliance (Annual)
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2023-04-17

Summary:

Based on Arizona Revised Statutes, \'a736-424(B) and Arizona Administrative Code, R9-10-109(E), the Department may not conduct an onsite compliance inspection during the time of the accreditation report. The licensee submitted to the Department the current accreditation report from the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF), valid from March 9, 2021 through May 31, 2024. If the health care institution's accreditation report is not valid for the entire licensing fee period of March 1, 2023 through February 28, 2024 the Department may conduct a compliance inspection of the health care institution during the time period the department does not have a valid accreditation report for the health care institution.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.