MARAVILLA SCOTTSDALE

Assisted Living Center | Assisted Living

Facility Information

Address 7375 East Princess Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85255
Phone 4805385600
License AL8636C (Active)
License Owner SP SCOTTSDALE, LLC
Administrator RAE L RICHARDSON
Capacity 84
License Effective 5/1/2025 - 4/30/2026
Services:
4
Total Inspections
3
Total Deficiencies
2
Complaint Inspections

Inspection History

INSP-0075587

Complete
Date: 4/26/2024
Type: Compliance (Annual)
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2024-05-24

Summary:

Based on Arizona Revised Statutes \'a7 36-424(B) and Arizona Administrative Code R9-10-109(E), the Department may accept an accreditation report in lieu of an onsite compliance inspection during the time of the accreditation report. The licensee submitted to the Department the current accreditation report from the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) valid from December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2026. If the health care institution's accreditation report is not valid for the entire licensing fee period, the Department may conduct a compliance inspection of the health care institution during the time period the department does not have a valid accreditation report for the health care institution.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.

INSP-0075585

Complete
Date: 3/5/2024
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2024-03-21

Summary:

An on-site investigation of complaints #AZ00194637 and #AZ00204911 was conducted on March 5, 2024 and the following deficiencies were cited :

Deficiencies Found: 1

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
J. If a manager has a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454 , to believe abuse, neglect or exploitation has occurred on the premises or while a resident is receiving services from an assisted living facility's manager, caregiver, or assistant caregiver, the manager shall:
5. Initiate an investigation of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation and document the following information within five working days after the report required in subsection (J)(2):
d. The actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation from occurring in the future; and
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, and interview, for one of two residents reviewed, the administrator failed to document the actions taken to prevent an alleged incident of abuse from occurring in the future, according to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) \'a7 46-454. The deficient practice posed a risk as the Department was unable to assess if there was an immediate health and safety concern for a resident who resided in the assisted living facility.

Findings include:

1. In record review, R1's medical record (received personal care services) included an "Incident Form," which documented, "Informed by visiting P.T. service that resident reported being physically attached by ... spouse... When questioned resident denied any physical alt... emotional abuse only." A "progress note," documented, "4/28/2023... Spoke with PT... as... was reporting resident notified... had been physically attacked by ... spouse. Writer immediately ... spoke with resident to obtain a statement and denied
any physical interactions and reported only emotional and verbal abuse. Resident counseled on utilizing ... pendant to call for assistance, removing ... self from the situation.. reported to APS. Will continue to monitor."

2. During an interview, E1 and E2 reported R1 reported to PT being hit by R1's spouse; however, R1 denied during a follow up interview with E2. The facility reported the allegation to APS, as required; however, did not document actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse from occurring in the future.

INSP-0075583

Complete
Date: 8/30/2023
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2023-09-01

Summary:

An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00198558 was conducted on August 30, 2023, and the following deficiencies were cited.

Deficiencies Found: 2

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
A. Except as required in subsection (B), a manager shall ensure that a resident has a written service plan that:
3. Includes the following:
b. The level of service the resident is expected to receive;
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review and interview, for one resident reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan to include the level of service the resident was expected to receive. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan did not reinforce and clarify services to be provided to a resident.

Findings include:

A.R.S. \'a7 36-401.38 defines "Supervisory care services" to mean general supervision, including daily awareness of resident functioning and continuing needs, the ability to intervene in a crisis and assistance in the self-administration of prescribed medications.

A.R.S. \'a7 36-401.38 defines " Personal care services" to mean assistance with activities of daily living that can be performed by persons without professional skills or professional training and includes the coordination or provision of intermittent nursing services and the administration of medications and treatments by a nurse who is licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 15 or as otherwise provided by law.

A.R.S. \'a7 36-401.38 defines "Directed care services" means programs and services, including supervisory and personal care services, that are provided to persons who are incapable of recognizing danger, summoning assistance, expressing need or making basic care decisions.

1. In record review, R1's medical record included a service plan dated March 24, 2023; however, did not include documentation of the level of service the resident was expected to receive.

2. During an interview, E1 acknowledged R1's service plan did not include the level of service R1 was expected to receive, and that R1 received personal care services.

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
A. Except as required in subsection (B), a manager shall ensure that a resident has a written service plan that:
4. Is reviewed and updated based on changes in the requirements in subsections (A)(3)(a) through (f):
a. No later than 14 calendar days after a significant change in the resident's physical, cognitive, or functional condition; and
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, and interview, for one resident reviewed, the manager failed to ensure a resident had a written service plan that was reviewed and updated after a significant change in the resident's condition. The deficient practice posed a risk to a resident if the service plan did not include a description of the resident's condition, for which services were to be provided.

Findings include:

"Service plan" means a written description of a resident's need for supervisory care services, personal care services, directed care services, ancillary services, or behavioral health services and the specific assisted living services to be provided to the resident.

1. In record review, R1's medical record (received personal care services) included documentation R1 was not feeling well, was hospitalized for a few days, and returned to the facility with Hospice services initiated. R1's record included a service plan, dated March 24, 2023. Based on R1's change of condition, an updated service plan was required.

2. During an interview, E1 reported R1 wasn't feeling well, was sent to the hospital and diagnosed with a "mass." R1 returned to the facility and Hospice services were initiated. E1 reported R1's service plan was not reviewed and updated, and acknowledged a service plan was required no later than 14 days after a resident's change in condition.

INSP-0075582

Complete
Date: 4/3/2023
Type: Compliance (Annual)
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2023-04-12

Summary:

Based on Arizona Revised Statutes \'a7 36-424(B) and Arizona Administrative Code R9-10-109(E), the Department may accept an accreditation report in lieu of an onsite compliance inspection during the time of the accreditation report. The licensee submitted to the Department the current accreditation report from the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) valid from December 1, 2020, through November 30, 2023. If the health care institution's accreditation report is not valid for the entire licensing fee period, the Department may conduct a compliance inspection of the health care institution during the time period the department does not have a valid accreditation report for the health care institution.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.