LA SONORA AT DOVE MOUNTAIN

Assisted Living Center | Assisted Living

Facility Information

Address 5250 West Dove Centre Road, Marana, AZ 85658
Phone 5202620301
License AL11858C (Active)
License Owner DOVE MOUNTAIN RESIDENCES, LLC
Administrator Rebecca Allison
Capacity 116
License Effective 8/17/2025 - 8/16/2026
Services:
11
Total Inspections
28
Total Deficiencies
11
Complaint Inspections

Inspection History

INSP-0160610

POC
Date: 9/29/2025
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-11-12

Summary:

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00145732, 00145700, 00104411, 00146051, 00146047, 00104285, and 00104208, conducted on September 29, 2025:

Deficiencies Found: 1

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-817.B.3.a-c. Medication Services<br> B. If an assisted living facility provides medication administration, a manager shall ensure that: <br>3. A medication administered to a resident: <br>a. Is administered by an individual under the direction of a medical practitioner, <br>b. Is administered in compliance with a medication order, and <br>c. Is documented in the resident’s medical record.
Evidence/Findings:
<p>Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure medication was administered to a resident in compliance with a medication order. </p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p>1. A review of R2’s medical record revealed a medication order for “Amlodipine Besylate 5 MG TAB Take 1 tablet by mouth daily, check Bp q day, and hold if SBP < 115.” Further review revealed a medication administration record (MAR) for documenting the administration of medications during September 2025, including “Amlodipine Besylate 5 MG TAB Take 1 tablet by mouth daily, check Bp Daily, and hold if Sbp Less Than 115.” The record reflected R2 refused administration of Amlodipine every day, from September 2 through September 19, 2025. In addition, R2’s medical record contained an order to discontinue Amlodipine, which was dated September 19, 2025.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>2. A review of facility documentation revealed a written request from E2 to R2’s primary care provider, dated September 15, 2025. The request was for an order to discontinue R2’s Amlodipine due to R2’s refusal to take the medication.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>3. In an interview, E2 advised efforts were not made to contact R2’s primary care provider regarding R2’s refusal to take Amlodipine as ordered until September 15, 2025. E2 acknowledged Amlodipine had not been administered to R2 as ordered for eighteen days before the facility received an order from R2’s primary care provider to discontinue administration of Amlodipine.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>4. <span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.</span></p>
Temporary Solution:
HSD [nurse] immediately reviewed medications to ensure no other resident had refusals that had not been address with healthcare provider and responsible parties.
Permanent Solution:
HSD [nurse] conducted training with all Med Techs instructing them to report all medication refusals. HSD is contacting health care providers and responsible parties (if applicable) when refusal happens on 3rd day in a row. Orders or instructions will be requested and followed up on.
Person Responsible:
Rebecca Allison, Executive Director

INSP-0160346

Enforcement
Date: 9/23/2025
Type: Complaint;Compliance (Annual)
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-10-22

Summary:

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint 00145543, conducted on September 23, 2025:

Deficiencies Found: 4

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-806.A.8.a-b. Personnel<br> A. A manager shall ensure that: <br>8. A manager, a caregiver, and an assistant caregiver, or an employee or a volunteer who has or is expected to have more than eight hours per week of direct interaction with residents, provides evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis: <br>a. On or before the date the individual begins providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility, and b. As specified in R9-10-113;
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an employee provided documentation of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility, as specified in R9-10-113, for two of nine employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;">1. A review of E4’s personnel record revealed evidence of documentation of baseline assessment of risk of exposure to active TB; however, the risk assessment was not signed by a registered nurse, medical provider, or local health authority. Further review revealed evidence of a baseline assessment of E4’s signs and symptoms of active TB was unavailable for review. </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;">2. A review of E5’s personnel record revealed evidence of documentation of a two-step skin test for TB. The documentation indicated the second step skin test was initiated on May 19, 2025, but the reading was conducted on June 13, 2025, more than 72 hours after the test was initiated. </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;">3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided. E1 agreed E4’s personnel record did not contain evidence of baseline screening, and E5’s second step skin test was not evaluated within between 48 and 72 hours after being initiated. E1 acknowledged E4 and E5 did not provide appropriate documentation of freedom from infectious TB, as specified in R9-10-113, on or before the date E4 or E5 began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility.</span></p>

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-807.A.1-2. Residency and Residency Agreements<br> A. Except as provided in R9-10-808(B)(2), a manager shall ensure that a resident provides evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis: <br>1. Before or within seven calendar days after the resident’s date of occupancy, and <br>2. As specified in R9-10-113
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on record review and interview, for four of seven residents sampled, the manager failed to ensure a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) within seven calendar days after the resident’s date of occupancy</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1. Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113(A)(2)(a)(i-ii) states: “a. For each individual who is…admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, baseline screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious [TB], ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of [TB].”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2. A review of R6’s medical record revealed evidence of documentation of a negative TB skin test. However, evidence of baseline screening for signs, symptoms, and risk of exposure to TB was unavailable for review. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3. A review of R3’s, R4’s, and R7’s medical records revealed evidence of baseline screening for signs, symptoms, and risk of exposure to TB. However, evidence of documentation of a negative skin or blood test for TB was unavailable for review.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">4. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> In an interview, E1 advised </span><span style="font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">R3, R4, R6 and R7 had all been accepted into the facility by the facility's former manager, and before E1's date of hire. E1 </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">acknowledged R3, R4, R6, and R7 had not provided evidence of freedom from infectious TB as specified in R9-10-113, before or within seven calendar days of their respective dates of occupancy.</span></p>

Deficiency #3

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-810.B.2.i. Resident Rights<br> B. A manager shall ensure that: <br>2. A resident is not subjected to: <br>i. Restraint;
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was not subjected to restraint. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black;">The deficient practice posed a risk as it violated a resident's rights. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="background-color: white; font-size: 12pt;">1. A review of E5’s personnel record revealed a document titled “Disciplinary Action Record.” The document included a section titled “Detailed Description:” which alleged a resident reported a caregiver had “pushed,” “slapped,” and “grabbed both…arms” of the resident. The report also indicated the resident had a bruise on their right lower arm, above the wrist. In addition, the document included a section titled “Employee Statement” to document the employee’s response to any allegation. The section indicated E5 “put my arm as weight on [the resident’s] wrist,” because the resident was not allowing E5 to clean the resident.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; background-color: white;">In an interview, E2 advised R4 had told a caregiver on September 18, 2025, that E5 had beaten R4 while bathing R4 on September 16, 2025. E2 </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">stated the</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">caregiver had been determined to be E5. According to E2, E5 had verbally admitted to</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">grabbing R4’s wrist, and E4 had written the statement noted in the Employment</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Statement of the Disciplinary Action Report, admitting E5 had used their arm as</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">a weight to restrain R4, who was resisting care. E2 advised E5 was placed</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">on suspension, pending E1’s investigation into the allegation.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3. In an interview, E1 advised E4’s employment was terminated, in part, based on E4’s admission of restraining R4. E1 acknowledged R4 had been subject to restraint by E5’s own admission.</span></p>

Deficiency #4

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-820.A.11. Environmental Standards<br> A. A manager shall ensure that: <br>11. Poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility are maintained in labeled containers in a locked area separate from food preparation and storage, dining areas, and medications and are inaccessible to residents;
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the assisted living facility were maintained in labeled containers in a locked area separate from food preparation and storage, dining areas, and medications, and were inaccessible to residents. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1. During a tour of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a caregiver work area that was open and unoccupied. The Compliance Officer freely entered the work area and observed multiple cabinets, each affixed with locking mechanisms which required a key to secure and open. Several of the cabinets were left unsecured, and the Compliance Officer was able to open them with little effort. Inside one of the cabinets, the Compliance Officer observed a can of “Raid Ant Killer” and a clear plastic bottle containing a blue liquid. The bottle and liquid were reminiscent of mouthwash; however, when removed from the cabinet, the Compliance Officer discovered the bottle was labeled “Mr. Clean Multi-Surface Cleaner.” Each of the containers was marked “CAUTION KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN.” Upon discovery, E1 had all of the cabinets in the work area secured by a caregiver who was passing by, and had a key.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> E1 acknowledged the </span><span style="font-size: 16px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">poisonous or toxic materials </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">were not kept in a secure area, inaccessible to residents.  </span></p>

INSP-0137633

Complete
Date: 7/29/2025
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-09-05

Summary:

No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00137797 conducted on July 29, 2025.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.

INSP-0136905

POC
Date: 7/24/2025
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-09-10

Summary:

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint 00137001 conducted on July 24, 2025:

Deficiencies Found: 3

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-803.J.1-6. Administration<br> J. If a manager has a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46- 454, to believe abuse, neglect or exploitation has occurred on the premises or while a resident is receiving services from an assisted living facility’s manager, caregiver, or assistant caregiver, the manager shall: <br>1. If applicable, take immediate action to stop the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; <br>2. Report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454; 3. Document: <br>a. The suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; <br>b. Any action taken according to subsection (J)(1); and <br>c. The report in subsection (J)(2); <br>4. Maintain the documentation in subsection (J)(3) for at least 12 months after the date of the report in subsection(J)(2); <br>5. Initiate an investigation of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation and document the following information within five working days after the report required in subsection (J)(2): <br>a. The dates, times, and description of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; <br>b. A description of any injury to the resident related to the suspected abuse or neglect and any change to the resident’s physical, cognitive, functional, or emotional condition; <br>c. The names of witnesses to the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; and <br>d. The actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation from occurring in the future; and <br>6. Maintain a copy of the documented information required in subsection (J)(5) for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated.
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on documentation review and interview, after having a reasonable basis to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a resident had occurred, the manager failed to immediately report the incident according to </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">A.R.S. § 46-454. </span>The deficient practice posed a potential safety risk for residents and a potential rights violation due to a delay in reporting alleged abuse, neglect, or exploitation.<span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1. A review of facility documentation revealed an incident report, dated July 16, 2025, at “11:28 PM” which documented an incident of alleged physical abuse and resident rights violation involving E6 and R1. The report indicated R1 had “repeatedly told [E6] that [E6] was hurting [R1]. The report also indicated R1 felt E6 was trying “…to make [R1] feel ashamed of being incontinent.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2. A review of facility documentation revealed an investigative report, mostly compliant with R9-10-803(J)(1-6). The documentation included a report to Adult Protective Services (APS); however, the report to APS included documentation which indicated the report was not made until “July 17, 2025,” at “3:54 PM.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the report to APS was not made immediately as required per R9-10-803(J)(2), according to </span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">A.R.S. § 46-454.</span></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"><span class="ql-cursor"></span>This is a repeat citation from a complaint investigation conducted on February 27, 2025.</span></p>
Temporary Solution:
Health & Wellness Director [HWD] at the time of incident being reported to her by staff, failed to report to APS immediately the suspected abuse [07/16/25]. The HWD left the employ of the community unexpectedly on 07/16/25. When it was discovered the incident had not been reported to APS, the Executive Director immediately reported [07/17/25].
Immediately-All alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation is reported immediately to APS or law enforcement by the HWD, ED or designee with date and time proof of report becoming part of the investigation record.
Permanent Solution:
9/23/25-Re-training was provided during All Staff meetings and policy redistributed to all staff regarding reporting suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation.
10/2/25- 24/7 APS contact information posted at all nursing stations and administrative offices as well as verification ED and HWD have this information programmed in cell phones.
________________________________________
Person Responsible:
Rebecca Allison, Executive Director

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-806.A.4.a-b. Personnel<br> A. A manager shall ensure that: <br>A caregiver’s or assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge are verified and documented: <br>a. Before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provides physical health services or behavioral health services, and <br>b. According to policies and procedures;
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services for one of eight caregivers sampled. </span><span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black;">The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were unable to meet a resident's needs.</span><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1. A review of facility policy and procedures, last reviewed October 1, 2024, revealed a policy titled “Employee Training & In-Service.” The policy read, in part, “The community will ensure that caregivers are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents’ needs…”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2. A review of staff schedules for July 2025 revealed E4 worked numerous shifts throughout the month.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3. A review of E4’s personnel record revealed E4 was hired as a caregiver. Further review revealed evidence E4’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before E4 provided physical health services were unavailable for review.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged evidence of documentation of verification of E4’s skills and knowledge was unavailable for review.</span></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><span class="ql-cursor"></span>This is a repeat citation from a complaint investigation conducted on February 7, 2025.</span></p><p><br></p><p><br></p>
Temporary Solution:
On 7/25/2025: Identified Caregiver who was missing the checklist from her file had completed a skills checklist; document was found amongst another caregiver’s new hire paperwork. Prior to finding the paperwork the Caregiver was required to complete a new Skills Checklist with a Certified Caregiver.
Permanent Solution:
All Caregiver and Assistant Caregiver personnel files were reviewed to identify missing skills verification documentation. Ensured no caregiver provides services for which they lack documented skills.
Community will continue to follow the ongoing policy of:
1. Skills verification checklist completion mandatory before first day of providing resident care
2. Orientation period extended to include skills verification and competency demonstration
3. Mentorship program pairing new hires with experienced staff during skills verification period
4. Probationary period contingent on successful skills verification
New additional step prior to Caregiver providing care to residents unsupervised/without mentor:
5. Health & Wellness Director will verify completion and sign checklist document prior to new employee working without a mentor and before submitted to Caregiver and Assistant Caregiver’s personnel file.
Person Responsible:
Rebecca Allison, Executive Director

Deficiency #3

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-810.B.1. Resident Rights<br> B. A manager shall ensure that: <br>1. A resident is treated with dignity, respect, and consideration;
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration</span><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">. </span><span style="color: black;">The deficient practice posed a risk of injury and violated a resident's rights. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1. A review of facility documentation revealed an incident report, dated July 16, 2025, at “11:28 PM” which documented an incident of alleged physical abuse and resident rights violation involving E6 and R1. The report indicated R1 had “repeatedly told [E6] that [E6] was hurting [R1]. The report also indicated R1 felt E6 was trying “…to make [R1] feel ashamed of being incontinent.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2. A review of facility documentation revealed an investigative report, which included a report to Adult Protective Services (APS). The investigative report included an untitled and unsigned document, dated July 16, 2025, which indicated the facility Health and Wellness Director notified the Executive Director of the incident at 9:09 AM on July 16, 2025. The report included a typed and signed statement from R1, dated July 16, 2025. which indicated R1 felt E6 was cleaning R1 “…really rough…”, was “hurting” R1 and E6 continued treating R1 this way after R1 “…told [E6] to stop…” The statement also indicated R1 felt E6 was punishing R1 for being incontinent.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3. A review of the facility report to APS revealed the report regarding the incident involving E6 and R1 was not made until July 17, 2025, at 3:54 PM.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E6 had not treated R1 with dignity, respect, or consideration. E1 also acknowledged the mandatory report was not made immediately, but rather more than 24 hours after the executive director was made aware.</span></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">This is a repeat citation from a complaint investigation conducted on February 27, 2025.</span></p>
Temporary Solution:
The Manager [ED] was out of the community at the time the report of alleged abuse was made to her. The Health & Wellness Director [HWD] stated at that time she would report to APS and conduct investigation of allegation; she had already interviewed R1 and would interview E6 when she reported to work. The ED instructed HWD to immediately suspend E6 after collecting her statement pending full investigation.
At that time no injury was identified and the safety of R1 had been established and no ongoing danger to this resident or others was evident.
E6 was suspended immediately after being interviewed and escorted from premises prior to having access to any resident; she was then subsequently terminated despite the allegation not being substantiated by APS.
The Health & Wellness Director at the time of incident being reported to her by staff, failed to report to APS immediately the suspected abuse [07/16/25]. The HWD left the employ of the community unexpectedly on 07/16/25. When it was discovered the incident had not been reported to APS, the Executive Director [ED] immediately reported [07/17/25].
Immediately-All alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation is reported immediately to APS or law enforcement by the HWD, ED or other designee with date and time proof of report becoming part of the investigation record.
Permanent Solution:
9/24/25-Re-training was provided during All Staff meetings and policy redistributed to all staff regarding reporting suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation.
10/2/25- 24/7 APS contact information posted at all nursing stations and administrative offices as well as verification ED and HWD have this information programmed in cell phones.
Arizona Resident Rights posted in the ED office, HWD office and nurses’ stations on all floors.
________________________________________
Person Responsible:
Rebecca Allison, Executive Director

INSP-0130851

Complete
Date: 5/30/2025
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-07-07

Summary:

No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00129545 conducted on May 30, 2025.

✓ No deficiencies cited during this inspection.

INSP-0099685

POC
Date: 2/27/2025
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2025-04-04

Summary:

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00120754 and 00120753 conducted on February 27, 2025:

Deficiencies Found: 3

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-803.C.1.g. Administration<br> C. A manager shall ensure that policies and procedures are: <br> 1. Established, documented, and implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident that: <br> g. Cover how a caregiver will respond to a resident's sudden, intense, or out-of-control behavior to prevent harm to the resident or another individual;
Evidence/Findings:
<p>Based on document review and interview, the manager failed to ensure policies and procedures were established and implemented to protect the health and safety of a resident, which covered how a caregiver will respond to a resident’s sudden, intense, or out-of-control behavior to prevent harm to the resident or another individual The deficient practice posed a potential risk to the health and safety of residents.</p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68);"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">1. A review of facility policies and procedures, last reviewed June 20, 2024, revealed a policy titled “2.H. Emergency Response.” The policy stated, in part, “1. Medical Emergencies – </span><strong style="font-size: 12px;">Call 911</strong><span style="font-size: 12px;">. 2. Psychiatric Emergency - </span><strong style="font-size: 12px;">Call 911</strong><span style="font-size: 12px;">; and to the extent possible, keep the resident experiencing the emergency, and other residents and staff safe by: a. One on one monitoring of the resident experiencing the psychiatric emergency by: Moving the resident to a familiar, quiet place if they are willing to do so. C. Remove/relocate other residents to a point distant from the resident experiencing the psychiatric emergency such as to their own apartment, the dining room etc. …4. Criminal Situation – To the extent possible, ensure safety of residents and staff,</span><strong style="font-size: 12px;"> Call 911.”</strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">2. The Compliance Officer requested a more specific policy pertaining to how a caregiver will respond to a resident’s sudden, intense, or out-of-control behavior to prevent harm to the resident or another individual. However, evidence of documentation of another policy was unavailable for review.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">3. A review of facility “Charting Notes,” pertaining to R1 and entered between June 5, 2024, and January 7, 2025, revealed the following entries on the dates noted:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-June 20, 2024, “[R1] attempted to touch another resident inappropriately in the elevator. Writer redirected resident and separated them from other resident;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">- June 25, 2024, “After multiple reports of inappropriate conduct, ED spoke with resident who acknowledged </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1's]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> behavior and states </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> will stop making suggestive comments and touching residents and staff. Additionally, ED discussed [R1’s] desire to pleasure </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1's self] </span><span style="font-size: 12px;">while being showered and [R1] states this will also cease. POA aware;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 10, 2024, “[</span><span style="font-size: 16px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">Employee</span><span style="font-size: 12px;">] reported [R1] grabbed [employee</span><span style="font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">'s</span><span style="font-size: 12px;">] bottom while [employee] was in the hallway. [R1] was immediately told it was inappropriate and to not do that in the future. [R1] did it a second time about 30 minutes later. ED notified. [ED] stated it was reported the previous evening by [another employee] that [R1] tried to grab [another employee's] chest. IR was completed and POA was informed. [POA] will have a discussion with [R1] again, as will ED, PCP also notified;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 13, 2024 “ALERT CHARTING: [R1] placed on Alert Charting after a phone call from MT reporting [R1] expressed inappropriate sexual behaviors to another resident. [R1] said [R1] was ‘going to go to [other resident’s] room to sleep with [other resident] and if [other resident] didn’t want it, [R1] would be taking it or or (sic) doing it anyways.’ This was witnessed by [employee] as well as reported by the [other resident].”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 15, 2024, “ALERT CHARTING: Resident called for staff to change brief and already had shorts taken off, [was visibly sexually aroused] and expected and demanded that staff put a new brief on [R1]. Staff handed resident a new brief and resident stated ‘aren’t you going to put in on me?’ [R1] dresses [R1’s self] every morning and was encouraged to do the same with brief while staff monitored [R1] didn’t fall;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 16, 2024, HIGH RISK MEETING: CC Completed with Resident, POA, ED and SHD regarding inappropriate sexual conduct in the community. [R1] acknowledges understanding and states [R1] will no longer create this type of attention towards [R1’s self]. [R1] has </span><em style="font-size: 12px;">no cognitive decline</em><span style="font-size: 12px;"> (emphasis added). Staff will be cautious of not placing themselves in arms reach of inappropriate touching, have two caregivers present during cares and sit [R1] with [same sex] residents during meals to limit these opportunities. Resident on alert charting to be aware of the sexual conduct and monitor behaviors. ISP created;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 23, 2024, “ALERT CHARTING: Resident exhibited inappropriate behaviors towards [</span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">Staff member</span><span style="font-size: 12px;">], redirected;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 25, 2024, “[R1] touched my buttocks once during shift and I told [R1] it was unacceptable and made me uncomfortable [R1] responded byt (sic) saying ‘let me touch your butt.' [R1] also tried to grab me 3 other times near elevator and once witnessed by co-worker during bedtime bedtime (sic) med pass. [R1] also asked if my [spouse] was ‘[explitive]’:”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 29, 2024, “IR created post incident on 7/25/24 – inappropriate touching. Contacted PCP and [POA] to inform them of continued behaviors. ED was also notified. [ED] will have further discussion with [R1];”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-August 4, 2024, “[R1] reached and swiped staff buttocks as [R1] walked passed to walk to breakfast. [R1] was told to keep [R1’s] hands to [R1’s self] and that [R1’s] behavior was inappropriate. Community Nurse and POA were made aware of incident;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-September 3, 2024, “c/o [R1] asking a [</span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">staff member</span><span style="font-size: 12px;">] how big [their significant other's] [expletive] is during meals. [S</span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">taff member</span><span style="font-size: 12px;">] immediately walked away and reported the incident. Message left for [POA] to discuss ongoing concerns;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-September 23, 2024, [Unidentified Resident] came into [E6’s] office to inform me [Unidentified Resident] was just in the elevator with [R1] and [R1] reached over and grabbed [Unidentified Resident’s] chest. [Unidentified Resident] was very offended. [E6] went to the dining room and pulled [R1] aside in a private location and discussed the inappropriateness of the situation and [R1] was to keep [R1’s] hands and [R1’s] inappropriate comments to [R1's self]. [R1] acknowledged. Later in the day, [POA] & [POA's sibling] were in the building and [R6] discussed what occurred. They apologized and said they would also speak with [R1];</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-September 23, 2024, [R1] came to [E6’s] office to reassure me to (sic) [R1] would keep [R1’s] hands to [R1’s self] and apologized. Then [R1] asked [E6] not to ‘say anything to [POA]’. [E6] informed [R1] ‘[POA]he already knows’. [R1] said ‘OK’ and walked off. CC to be scheduled with resident and [POA] regarding the inappropriate comments and touching;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-September 26, 2024, “CC complete with RN, ED, [R1], [POA] and [POA's sibling]…on the phone…[R1] acknowledged [R1’s] actions and states </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> and [R1's spouse] had a very active sex life and [R1's spouse] left </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> to move to [another state]. [R1] is missing the sexual interaction. [POA's sibling and POA] said [R1] was always been a [person] with upstanding morals and are shocked by [R1’s] behavior. [POA's sibling] then stated [R1’s spouse] left [R1] for similar behaviors when [R1] grabbed [another individual] at a club…[R1] acknowledged understanding of the need to modify [R1’s] behavior and any further concerns may result in [R1] being discharged from the community. Family has agreed with plan;” and</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-November 7, 2024, “ALERT CHARTING: Another residents family has filed complaint against [R1] stating ‘As I came out of elevator with my parents, [R1] grabbed my butt. This was the second time, [R1] did this at Happy hour (sic) on Monday. This person told this resident ‘Stop touching me.’ [R5] yelled at [R1] and told </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> to ‘never touch [R5's child] again.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">4. A review of facility documentation titled “Observations,” revealed the following charting note entries on the dates noted:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-January 9, 2025, Resident called after mt went in to administer meds, 2 staff went into the room to check on resident, [R1] stated </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> lost his pants, staff showed </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> a pair of pants, then </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> stated </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> lost his panties, uncovered [R1’s self] and exposed </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1's self]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> to staff and kept repeating about needing help with </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1's]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> panties, grabbed </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1's]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> groin and stated it hurts. Staff informed </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> was able to change on </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1's]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> own. </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> said </span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[R1]</span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> was unable to;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">- February 23, 2025, “resident was touched inappropriately by [R1] as [R1] was walking back to [R1’s] room from dinner. [R2] was waiting outside [R3’s] room so they can go to dinner but was inappropriately touch and decided to stay in for the night [R2] got a room tray for the night Location: Hallway Day & Time: 2/23/2025 4:20 PM.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">5. A review of facility incident reports revealed nine incident reports created between June 20, 2024 and February 23, 2025, documenting incidents of R1’s inappropriate sexual behaviors, “suggestive language,” and inappropriate touching of [opposite sex] staff and residents on the buttocks, [chest] and groin areas. Each incident report included documentation of immediate action to prevent the behavior from occurring in the future as follows:</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-June 20, 2024, regarding [R1] trying to grab a caregiver’s [chest] and grabbing their buttock, “take another person in there with me;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 10, 2024, regarding [R1] grabbing a [</span><span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">staff member</span><span style="font-size: 12px;">] buttock for a third time, “was immediately told [R1] cannot do that;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">- July 13, 2024, regarding [R1] using suggestive language and inappropriate behavior, “[R1] was spoken to about the inappropriate behavior. Both residents were separated;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">- July 15, 2024 regarding [R1] calling caregiver into room, requesting a brief change while [R1] was exposed and [was sexually aroused], “ED spoke w/[R1] re: appropriate behaviors;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-July 25, 2024, regarding [R1] touching the buttock of a caregiver, trying to grab the caregiver on three prior occasions, and using inappropriate language, “Spoke w/ resident regarding behaviors, ED spoke w/ resident;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-August 4, 2024, regarding [R1] touching the buttock of [staff] member, “ongoing concern being handled by ED;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-September 19, 2024, regarding [R1] grabbing a [resident’s chest], “discussed w/ resident to keep hands to [R1's self];”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">-November 7, 2024, regarding [R1] grabbing the buttock of another resident’s [child] for the second time, “Continue to monitor behaviors. Discussion with resident was given with terms to discontinue behaviors…;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">6. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a document titled “Interim Service Plan,” dated May 15, 2024. The document identified a “Concern/Need” for R1 of “Inapprop Behavior.” The document, created and signed by E6, listed interventions as “Resident can get ‘handsy’ and touch other residents & staff,” “Redirect [R1] – discourage behavior,” Place @ meal table w/ [same sex] residents only,” and Monitor that [R1] doesn’t go into [opposite sex] resident’s rooms (has asked for one’s room #).</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px;">7. In an interview, E1 agreed R1’s behavior was out-of-control. E1 acknowledged the facility’s policy and procedure was not sufficient to cover how a caregiver will respond to a resident’s sudden, intense, or out-of-control behavior to prevent harm to a resident or another individual.</span></p>
Temporary Solution:
The Manager [ED] at the time of the Inspection visit (02/2025) is not the current Manager/Executive Director. Nor is it the same Management Company. It is unknown what their immediate and/or temporary action was to prevent reoccurrence.
Permanent Solution:
9/24/25-Re-training was provided during All Staff meetings and policy redistributed to all staff regarding reporting suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation.

10/2/25- 24/7 APS contact information posted at all nursing stations and administrative offices as well as verification ED and HWD have this information programmed in cell phones.

Monthly training from Resident Rights and Abuse Prevention Policies and Procedures Manual (specific policy for Deficiency and entire Manual is attached)
Person Responsible:
Rebecca Allison, Executive Director

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-803.J.1-6. Administration<br> J. If a manager has a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454 , to believe abuse, neglect or exploitation has occurred on the premises or while a resident is receiving services from an assisted living facility's manager, caregiver, or assistant caregiver, the manager shall: <br> 1. If applicable, take immediate action to stop the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; <br> 2. Report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454; <br> 3. Document: <br> a. The suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; <br> b. Any action taken according to subsection (J)(1); and <br> c. The report in subsection (J)(2); <br> 4. Maintain the documentation in subsection (J)(3) for at least 12 months after the date of the report in subsection(J)(2); <br> 5. Initiate an investigation of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation and document the following information within five working days after the report required in subsection (J)(2): <br> a. The dates, times, and description of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation;<br> b. A description of any injury to the resident related to the suspected abuse or neglect and any change to the resident's physical, cognitive, functional, or emotional condition; <br> c. The names of witnesses to the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; and <br> d. The actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation from occurring in the future; and <br> 6. Maintain a copy of the documented information required in subsection (J)(5) for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated.
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Based on document review, record review and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to document the report made to a peace officer or to the adult protective services central intake unit. The deficient practice posed a potential safety risk for residents and a potential rights violation if alleged abuse, neglect, or exploitation was not documented as required.</span> </p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">1. A review of a facility incident report dated February 23, 2025 revealed an incident of "inappropriate touching" of R2 by R1. The incident report reflected R2 was in the hallway and R1 was walking back to R1's apartment when R1 touched R2 on [R2's] buttocks and groin area. The report indicated the incident occurred at approximately 4:20 p.m., was not "immediately reported to local law enforcement," and the incident was not "a result of abuse or neglect."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a progress note, entered on February 23, 2025, at 9:10 p.m., which read, "Resident reported that [R2] was inappropriately touched by another resident and may feel the need for increased safety reassurance. A second entry on February 24, 2025, at 6:04 p.m., read, "resident was upset when [R2] found out [R2] lives a couple of doors down from [R1] it made resident upset to the point that [R2] wanted to call the police and [R2's sibling] did go try to talk to [E1] before [E1] left for the day resident did seem to calm down but was still upset about the situation."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">3. In an interview, E1 reported being advised of the incident between R1 and R2 on February 23, 2025 at approximately 8:00 p.m. E1 advised E1 reported the incident to Adult Protective Services (APS) and conducted an investigation into the matter. E1 stated they spoke with R1, R2, R3, and R1's representative, and other witnesses regarding the incident; however, E1 did not document those actions or interviews. E1 said R1's representative was given a verbal notice of termination of residency without notice, on February 24, 2025, and R1 was placed on observation every two hours. </span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">4. A review of R2's medical record revealed progress notes entered on February 24, 2025, at "6:04 PM," which read, "resident was upset when [R2] found out [R2] lives a couple of doors down from [R1] it made [R2] upset to the point that [R2] wanted to call police and [R2's] sister [R2] did try to talk to [E1] before [E1] left for the day resident did seem to calm down but was still upset about the situation."</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">5. A request was made to review the documented report E1 had made to APS, which E1 produced. The documentation indicated the report was made to APS on February 24, 2025, at "9:01 PM." </span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;">6. In an interview, E1 advised that R1 had been placed on hourly checks after the incident. E1 advised R1 was also made to dine in R1's residential unit to prevent further interaction with [opposite sex] residents. E1 indicated R1's power of attorney was contacted on February 24, 2025 and informed R1's residency was terminated immediately; however, R1 was not removed from the facility until February 26, 2025. E1 stated they had conducted their investigation as required per R9-10-803(J)(5); however, E1 agreed they had failed to document the investigation as required per </span><span style="font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(68, 68, 68);">R9-10-803(J)(6).</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></p>
Temporary Solution:
The Manager [ED] at the time of the Inspection Visit (02/27/2025) is not the current Manager/Executive Director. Nor is it the same Management Company. It is unknown what their immediate and/or temporary action was to prevent reoccurrence.
Permanent Solution:
9/24/25-Re-training was provided during All Staff meetings and policy redistributed to all staff regarding reporting suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation.
10/2/25- 24/7 APS contact information posted at all nursing stations and administrative offices as well as verification ED and HWD have this information programmed in cell phones.
Arizona Resident Rights posted in the ED office, HWD office and nurses’ stations on all floors.
Person Responsible:
Rebecca Allison, Executive Director

Deficiency #3

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-810.B.1. Resident Rights<br> B. A manager shall ensure that: <br> 1. A resident is treated with dignity, respect, and consideration;
Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 14px;">Based on record review, document review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. </span><span style="font-size: 14px;">The deficient practice posed a resident rights violation if the resident was subjected to abuse.</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 14px;">Findings include:</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">1. A review of R1’s medical record revealed a document titled “Physician’s Report,” dated May 10, 2024, which indicated R1 was experiencing “Mild Cognitive Impairment.” The document also indicated R1 required “Personal care services,” rather than Directed care services. Further, the document contained a section for documenting R1’s “Mental Condition.” The section reflected R1 was “Able to follow Instructions,” and “Able to Communicate Needs.” In addition, the section indicated R1 was not, “Confused/Disoriented,” and did not display “Inappropriate Behavior.” Further review of R1’s medical record revealed a document titled “Interim Service Plan,” dated May 15, 2024. The document identified a “Concern/Need” for R1 of “Inapprop Behavior.” The document, created and signed by E6, listed interventions as “Resident can get ‘handsy’ and touch other residents & staff; Redirect him – discourage behavior; Place @ meal table w/ [same sex] residents only,” and Monitor that [R1] doesn’t go into [opposite sex] resident’s rooms (has asked for one’s room #).”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">2. A review of R1’s service plan, dated May 27, 2024, revealed R1 received personal care services. The plan included a section titled “Dining,” which contained a note reading, “[R1] will dine with other [same sex] residents to limit opportunities for inappropriate touching.” The plan included another section titled “Redirection,” which stated, “…[R1] will be redirected for inappropriate touching of staff and other residents by using gentle reminders to not touch others. [R1] will dine with [same sex] residents to limit opportunities.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">3. A review of facility “Charting Notes,” pertaining to R1 and entered between June 5, 2024 and January 7, 2025 revealed the following entries on the dates noted:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-June 20, 2024, “[R1] attempted to touch another resident inappropriately in the elevator. Writer redirected resident and separated them from other resident;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">- June 25, 2024, “After multiple reports of inappropriate conduct, ED spoke with resident who acknowledge [their] behavior and states [they] will stop making suggestive comments and touching residents and staff. Additionally, ED discussed [R1’s] desire to pleasure [R1's self] while being showered and [R1] states this will also cease. POA aware;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 10, 2024, “[Staff member] reported [R1] grabbed [s</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">taff member's</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">] bottom while [s</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">taff member</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">] was in the hallway. [R1] was immediately told it was inappropriate and to not do that in the future. Resident did it a second time about 30 minutes later. ED notified. [ED] stated it was reported the previous evening by a [s</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">taff member</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">] that [R1] tried to grab [staff member's] chest. IR was completed and POA was informed. [POA] will have a discussion with [R1] again, as will ED, PCP also notified;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 13, 2024 “ALERT CHARTING: [R1] placed on Alert Charting after a phone call from MT reporting [R1] expressed inappropriate sexual behaviors to another resident. [R1] said [R1] was ‘going to go to [other resident’s] room to sleep with [other resident] and if [other resident didn’t want it, [R1] would be taking it or or (sic) doing it anyways.’ This was witnessed by [employee] as well as reported by the [other resident].”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 15, 2024, “ALERT CHARTING: Resident called for staff to change brief and already had shorts taken off, was sexually aroused, and expected and demanded that staff put a new brief on [R1]. Staff handed resident a new brief and resident stated ‘aren’t you going to put in on me?’ [R1] dresses [R1’s self] every morning and was encouraged to do the same with brief while staff monitored [R1] didn’t fall;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 16, 2024, HIGH RISK MEETING: CC Completed with Resident, POA, ED and SHD regarding inappropriate sexual conduct in the community. [R1] acknowledges understanding and states [R1] will no longer create this type of attention towards [R1’s self]. [R1] has </span><em style="font-size: 14px;">no cognitive decline</em><span style="font-size: 14px;"> (emphasis added). Staff will be cautious of not placing themselves in arms reach of inappropriate touching, have two caregivers present during cares and sit [R1] with [same sex] residents during meals to limit these opportunities. Resident on alert charting to be aware of the sexual conduct and monitor behaviors. ISP crated;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 23, 2024, “ALERT CHARTING: Resident exhibited inappropriate behaviors towards [</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Staff member</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">], redirected;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 25, 2024, “[R1] touched my buttocks once during shift and I told [R1] it was unacceptable and made me uncomfortable [R1] responded (sic) byt saying ‘let me touch your butt.; [R1] also tried to grab me 3 other times near elevator and once witnessed by co-worker during bedtime bedtime (sic) med pass. [R1] also asked if my [spouse] was ‘[explitive]’:”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 29, 2024, “IR created post incident on 7/25/24 – inappropriate touching. Contacted PCP and [POA] to inform them of continued behaviors. ED was also notified. [ED] will have further discussion with [R1];”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-August 4, 2024, “[R1] reached and swiped staff buttocks as [R1] walked passed to walk to breakfast. [R1] was told to keep [R1’s] hands to [R1’s self] and that [R1’s] behavior was inappropriate. Community Nurse and POA were made aware of incident;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-September 3, 2024, “c/o [R1] asking a [s</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">taff member</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">] how big [s</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">taff member's</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">] significant other's [expletive] is during meals. [S</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">taff member</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">] immediately walked away and reported the incident. Message left for [POA] to discuss ongoing concerns;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-September 23, 2024, [Unidentified Resident] came into [E6’s] office to inform me [Unidentified Resident] was just in the elevator with [R1] and [R1] reached over and grabbed [Unidentified Resident’s]. [Unidentified Resident] was very offended. [E6] went to the dining room and pulled [R1] aside in a private location and discussed the inappropriateness of the situation and [R1] was to keep [R1’s] hands and [R1’s] inappropriate comments to [R1's self]. [R1] acknowledged. Later in the day, [POA] & [POA's sibling] were in the building and [R6] discussed what occurred. They apologized and said they would also speak with [R1]</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-September 23, 2024, [R1] came to [E6’s] office to reassure me to (sic) [R1] would keep [R1’s] hands to [R1’s self] and apologized. Then [R1] asked [E6] not to ‘say anything to [POA]’. [E6] informed [R1] ‘[POA] already knows’. [R1] said ‘OK’ and walked off. CC to be scheduled with resident and [POA] regarding the inappropriate comments and touching;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-September 26, 2024, “CC complete with RN, ED, [R1], [POA] and [POA's sibling]…on the phone…[R1] acknowledged [R1’s] actions and states [R1] and [R1's spouse] had a very active sex life and [R1's spouse] left [R1] to move to [another state]. [R1] is missing the sexual interaction. [POA's sibling and POA] said [R1] was always been a [person] with upstanding morals and are shocked by [R1’s] behavior. </span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">[POA's sibling]</span><span style="font-size: 14px;"> then stated [R1’s spouse] left [R1] for similar behaviors when [R1] grabbed [another person] at a club…[R1] acknowledged understanding of the need to modify [R1’s] behavior and any further concerns may result in him being discharged from the community. Family has agreed with plan;” and</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-November 7, 2024, “ALERT CHARTING: Another resident's family has filed complaint against [R1] stating ‘As I came out of elevator with my parents, [R1] grabbed my butt. This was the second time, [R1] did this at Happy hour (sic) on Monday. This person told this resident ‘Stop touching me.’ [R5] yelled at [R1] and told [R1] to ‘never touch [R5's child] again.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">4. A review of facility documentation titled “Observations,” revealed the following charting note entries on the dates noted:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-January 9, 2025, Resident called after mt went in to administer meds, 2 staff went into the room to check on resident, [R1] stated [R1] lost [R1's] pants, staff showed [R1] a pair of pants, then [R1] stated [R1] lost [R1's] panties, uncovered [R1’s self] and exposed himself to staff and kept repeating about needing help with his panties, grabbed [R1's] genatalia and stated it hurts. Staff informed [R1] was able to change on [R1's] own. [R1] said [R1] was unable to;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">- February 23, 2025, “resident was touched inappropriately by [R1] as [R1] was walking back to [R1’s] room from dinner. [R2] was waiting outside [R3’s] room so they can go to dinner but was inappropriately touched and decided to stay in for the night [R2} got a room tray for the night Location: Hallway Day & Time: 2/23/2025 4:20 PM.”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">5. A review of facility incident reports revealed nine incident reports created between June 20, 2024 and February 23, 2025, documenting incidents of R1’s inappropriate sexual behaviors, “suggestive language,” and inappropriate touching of [opposite sex] staff and residents on the buttocks, chest and groin areas. Each incident report included documentation of immediate action to prevent the behavior from occurring in the future as follows:</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-June 20, 2024, regarding [R1] trying to grab a caregiver’s chest and grabbing their buttock, “take another person in there with me;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 10, 2024, regarding [R1] grabbing a [</span><span style="font-size: 14px; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">staff member's</span><span style="font-size: 14px;">] buttock for a third time, “was immediately told [R1] cannot do that;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">- July 13, 2024, regarding [R1] using suggestive language and inappropriate behavior, “[R1] was spoken to about the inappropriate behavior. Both residents were separated;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">- July 15, 2024 regarding [R1] calling caregiver into room, requesting a brief change while [R1] was exposed and [was sexually aroused], “ED spoke w/[R1] re: appropriate behaviors;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-July 25, 2024, regarding [R1] touching the buttock of a caregiver, trying to grab the caregiver on three prior occasions, and using inappropriate language, “Spoke w/ resident regarding behaviors, ED spoke w/ resident;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-August 4, 2024, regarding [R1] touching the buttock of [staff member], “ongoing concern being handled by ED;”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-September 19, 2024, regarding [R1] grabbing a resident’s chest, “discussed w/ resident to keep hands to [R1's self];”</span></p><p><br></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">-November 7, 2024, regarding [R1] grabbing the buttock of another resident’s [child] for the second time, “Continue to monitor behaviors. Discussion with resident was given with terms to discontinue behaviors…;”</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">6. In an interview, E3 advised it was common knowledge among staff R1 was inappropriate with [opposite sex] staff and residents. E3 reported they did not know if the current manager, E1 was aware of R1’s inappropriate behavior. E3 stated the previous manager was aware of R1's inappropriate behavior. E3 said they became aware of the incident between R1 and R2 on February 24, 2025. E3 indicated they had found a hand-written note from R2 as well as a typed note from R3 in the medication cart, describing an incident on February 23, 2024, in which R1 had purportedly touched R2’s buttock and groin area. E3 reported they were not working on February 23, 2024 and did not know who put the notes in the medication cart. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 14px;">7. In an interview, E1 reported their date of hire was February 1, 2025, and advised R1 became aware of R1’s behaviors on February 23, 2024, after E1 was informed of an incident of “inappropriate touching” of R2 by R1. E1 acknowledged the incident was not reported immediately to law enforcement or Adult Protective Services. E1 said they were waiting for instructions from E1’s immediate supervisor before reporting the incident as required. After reviewing R1’s history of inappropriate touching of [opposite sex] staff and residents, E1 acknowledged R1’s behaviors and presence at the facility placed all [opposite sex] residents and staff at risk of being accosted by R1. E1 expressed the previous manager was certainly aware of R1’s behaviors and allowed R1 to remain at the facility instead of terminating R1’s residency. E1 agreed R1 being allowed to remain at the facility after having accosted numerous [opposite sex] staff and residents was a violation of every [opposite sex] resident’s right to be treated with dignity, respect, and consideration, while R1 was present at the facility.</span></p>
Temporary Solution:
The Manager [ED] at the time of the Inspection visit (02/2025) is not the current Manager/Executive Director. Nor is it the same Management Company. It is unknown what their immediate and/or temporary action was to prevent reoccurrence.
Permanent Solution:
9/24/25-Re-training was provided during All Staff meetings and policy redistributed to all staff regarding reporting suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation.
10/2/25- 24/7 APS contact information posted at all nursing stations and administrative offices as well as verification ED and HWD have this information programmed in cell phones.
Arizona Resident Rights posted in the ED office, HWD office and nurses’ stations on all floors and poster sized versions were posted in AL ad MC resident common areas(attached).
Person Responsible:
Rebecca Allison, Executive Director

INSP-0076396

Complete
Date: 11/5/2024
Type: Complaint;Compliance (Annual)
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2024-12-05

Summary:

The following deficiencies were found during the compliance inspection and investigation of complaint AZ00217907 and AZ00217423 conducted on November 05, 2024:

Deficiencies Found: 9

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
36-420.04. Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge document
A. An assisted living center or assisted living home that contacts an emergency responder on behalf of a resident shall provide to the emergency responder a written document that includes all of the following:
1. The reason or reasons the emergency responder was requested on behalf of the resident.
2. Whether the resident receives medication services and, if the resident has provided this information to the assisted living center or assisted living home, a list of all the resident's prescription and over-the-counter medications, their dosages and how frequently they are administered.
3. The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy.
4. A list of any known allergies to any medications, additives, preservatives or materials like latex or adhesive.
5. The name and contact information for the resident's primary care physician and power of attorney or authorized representative.
6. Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history, such as having diabetes or a pacemaker or experiencing frequent falls or cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, as well as dates of recent episodes, if known.
7. The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home, including the telephone number, if available, cell phone number and email address. A point of contact must be available to respond to questions regarding the information provided twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
8. A copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living center or assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge. This paragraph does not preclude a resident from revoking the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act r
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the assisted living facility failed to provide the required documentation to an emergency responder, for four of four sampled residents for whom an emergency responder had been contacted and the resident was transported to a hospital.

Findings include:

1. A review of facility documentation revealed four incident reports between October 1, 2024 and October 31, 2024 in which emergency medical services were called and residents were transported to the hospital. The Compliance Officer requested to review the standardized form and documentation provided to emergency medical services prior to each resident's transportation. However, evidence of such documentation was unavailable for review.

2. In an interview, E1 reported being aware of the implementation of A.R.S. 36-420.04. E1 advised all of the information required per A.R.S. 36-420.04 had been provided to emergency responders. However, E1 advised the facility did not have a standardized form used for each resident as required. E1 stated a copy of the documentation of what was given to the emergency responders for each resident was not available for review.

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
A. A governing authority shall:
9. Ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. \'a7 36-411, for three of eight personnel members sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if E4, E8 or E9 was a danger to a vulnerable population.

Findings include:

1. A review of E4's personnel record revealed E4 was hired as Dietary Aide in August 2024. The record included evidence of employment history and a photocopy of a valid fingerprint clearance card. However, evidence of good faith efforts to contact prior employers to obtain information or recommendations relevant to E4's fitness to work in a health care institution were not available for review.

2. A review of E8's personnel record revealed E8 was hired as a housekeeper in June 2023. The record included evidence of employment history and a photocopy of a valid fingerprint clearance card. However, evidence of good faith efforts to contact prior employers to obtain information or recommendations relevant to E8's fitness to work in a health care institution were not available for review.

3. A review of E9's personnel record revealed E9 was hired as a Medication Technician in September 2024. The record included evidence of employment history and a photocopy of a valid fingerprint clearance card. However, evidence of good faith efforts to contact prior employers to obtain information or recommendations relevant to E9's fitness to work in a health care institution were not available for review.

4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E4's, E8's, and E9's personnel records did not contain evidence of good faith efforts to contact all prior employers.

Deficiency #3

Rule/Regulation Violated:
A. A manager shall ensure that:
4. A caregiver's or assistant caregiver's skills and knowledge are verified and documented:
a. Before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provides physical health services or behavioral health services, and
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, document review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver's skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver provided physical health services or behavioral health services for one of four certified caregivers sampled.

Findings include:

1. A review of E9's personnel record revealed E9 was hired as a caregiver on September 24, 2024. However, evidence of documentation E9's skills and knowledge were observed and verified before E9 provided physical health services was unavailable for review.

2. A review of the caregiver schedule for October 2024, revealed E9 was scheduled to work the "6am - 2pm" shift on October 9, 10, 12, 15-19, 22-24, 29-31.

3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged there was no evidence available for review to show E9's skills and knowledge had been verified prior to providing physical health services.

Deficiency #4

Rule/Regulation Violated:
A. A manager shall ensure that:
10. Before providing assisted living services to a resident, a manager or caregiver provides current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification specific to adults.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review, record review and interview the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provides current documentation of first aid training and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training certification specific to adults, prior to providing assisted living services to a resident for one of ten personnel members sampled.

Findings include:

1. A review of facility staffing schedule for October 1, 2024 through October 31, 2024, revealed E2 was scheduled to work numerous shifts between the date range.

2. A review of E2's personnel record revealed E2 was hired as a Medication Technician on August 22, 2022. E2's personnel record contained evidence of documentation indicating E2 completed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training on April 12, 2022. The documentation indicated E2 needed to renew their CPR training by April 2024. Evidence of current documentation indicating E2 completed CPR training was not available for review.

3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E2 did not possess current documentation of CPR training and was providing assisted living services to residents.

Deficiency #5

Rule/Regulation Violated:
F. A manager of an assisted living facility authorized to provide directed care services shall ensure that:
2. There is a means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort that meets one of the following:
a. Provides access to an outside area that:
i. Allows the resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility, and
ii. Controls or alerts employees of the egress of a resident from the facility;
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the means of exiting the facility for a resident who does not have a key, special knowledge for egress, or the ability to expend increased physical effort, controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident.

Findings include:

1. A review of the license issued by the Department revealed the facility was authorized to provide directed care services.

2. During a tour of the facility's secure memory care unit, the Compliance Officer observed a door leading out to a courtyard which allowed residents to be a least 30 feet away from the facility. The door was not equipped with a locking mechanism, and could be opened by pushing on the push bar mechanism. The door was equipped with a device intended to alert employees to the egress of a resident to the outside area, however the device did not sound an alert when the Compliance Officer pressed the push bar and opened the door with little effort.

3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged there was a means of exiting the facility which allowed residents to be at least 30 feet away from the facility, which did not control or alert employees of the egress of a resident.

Deficiency #6

Rule/Regulation Violated:
A. A manager shall ensure that:
2. The disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) is reviewed at least once every 12 months;
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the disaster plan required in subsection (A)(1) was reviewed at least once every 12 months. The deficient practice posed a risk as a disaster plan reinforces and clarifies standards expected of employees.

Findings include:

1. A review of facility documentation revealed evidence of a disaster plan review dated September 6, 2023. However, evidence of documentation of an annual disaster plan review in 2024 was unavailable for review.

2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged a disaster plan was not reviewed at least once every twelve months.

Deficiency #7

Rule/Regulation Violated:
A. A manager shall ensure that:
5. An evacuation drill for employees and residents:
a. Is conducted at least once every six months; and
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure an evacuation drill for employees and residents was conducted at least once every six months and documented.

Findings include:

1. A review of facility documentation revealed documentation of evacuation drills conducted in July 2023 and January 2024. However, evidence of documentation of an evacuation drill for employees and residents conducted in July 2024 was not available for review.

2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged an evacuation drill for employees and residents was not conducted at least once every six months and documented as required.

Deficiency #8

Rule/Regulation Violated:
D. When a resident has an accident, emergency, or injury that results in the resident needing medical services, a manager shall ensure that a caregiver or an assistant caregiver:
2. Documents the following:
a. The date and time of the accident, emergency, or injury;
b. A description of the accident, emergency, or injury;
c. The names of individuals who observed the accident, emergency, or injury;
d. The actions taken by the caregiver or assistant caregiver;
e. The individuals notified by the caregiver or assistant caregiver; and
f. Any action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documented an event in which a resident had an accident, injury or emergency and needed medical services, as required per R9-10-818.D.2.

Findings include:

1. A review of facility documentation from October 1, 2024 through October 31, 2024 revealed an incident report dated October 3, 2024, which indicated R8 had been found unresponsive to care staff and was transported to the hospital. The report contained most documentation required required per R9-10-818.D.2; however, it failed to include documentation of notification of R8's primary care provider.

2. In an interview, E1 agreed the incident report did not contain all documented required per R9-10-818.D.2.

Deficiency #9

Rule/Regulation Violated:
R9-10-113. Tuberculosis Screening
A. If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that:
2. Include:
a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, baseline screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of:
i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis,
ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and
iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1);
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to implement tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities including baseline screening, for four of eight personnel members sampled.

Findings include:

1. A review of E3's personnel record revealed evidence of documentation of baseline screening was not available for review.

2. A review of E1's, E4's, and E9's personnel record revealed evidence of documentation of baseline screening for signs and symptoms of TB. However, the documentation did not include assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious TB.

3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the personnel file provided for E3 did not include documentation of baseline screening for TB. E1 acknowledged the personnel files provided for E1, E4, and E9 did not include documentation of baseline screening for TB, to include assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis.

INSP-0076394

Complete
Date: 7/22/2024
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2024-07-29

Summary:

An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00202016, AZ00203812, AZ00211859, AZ00213003, were conducted on July 22, 2024, and the following deficiencies were cited :

Deficiencies Found: 1

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
B. A manager shall ensure that:
1. A resident is treated with dignity, respect, and consideration;
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review, observation and interview the manager failed to ensure a resident is treated with dignity, respect, and consideration. The deficient practice posed a potential resident rights violation if residents were subject to abuse and were subjected to ridicule, demeaning, or derogatory remarks.

Findings include:

A.R.S. 46-451 "Abuse" means: (a) Intentional infliction of physical harm; (b) Injury caused by negligent acts or omissions; (c) Unreasonable confinement; (d) Sexual abuse or sexual assault; (e) Emotional abuse.

Incident involving R3:

1. A review of documentation dated July 11, 2024, revealed the facility made the following report: "The reporting source (RS) states that the adult victim (AV) is abused by multiple alleged perpetrators (AP). The AV has bilateral injuries to both their left and right wrist. It is reported the AV was held by their wrist by the AP and stripped off their clothes and briefs by the overnight staff from 10 PM - 6 AM. The AP's have been suspended as of July 11, 2024". The Marana Police Department was notified on July 11, 2024.

2. A review of documentation provided by E1 revealed a timeline investigation of this incident. On July 11, 2024, E4 went to E1 and reported that E12 had shared the following information. E12 was concerned that R3 was being held down on the bed by caregivers by holding R3's wrists to change R3's brief. E1 reached out to E12 who confirmed the actions stating it's due to R3 being combative during care and they needed multiple care staff to assist with brief changes. E12 reported that E10 changed the brief while E12, and E11 held onto R3's wrists.

3. On July 11, 2024, O1 from the Marana Police Department arrived to see R3 and interview the caregivers. During the interviews, O1 had been told E7 was involved in holding R3 down. E7 then reported to O1 that E8, and E9 had also been involved.

4. O1 was escorted to R3's room in the memory care section of the facility. O1 reported R3 was pleasant and cooperative during conversation and willingly to allow O1 to view and take photographs of bilateral bruising areas. In the timeline, O1 observed the bruising on R3's wrists. O1 expressed concerns with the bruising on the right forearm-3 small bruises spaced approximately 1/4" to 1/2" and noting significant bruising.

5. E8, E9, E10, E11, and E12 have been put on suspension until the investigation is completed.

Incident involving R1:

6. A review of documentation provided by Adult Protective Services (APS) dated November 22, 2024, revealed the facility made the following report: "The client was yelled/cursed at by another staff member".

7. A review of documentation revealed a document dated November 19, 2023/November 20, 2023. The document was a statement prepared by E14. E14 reported overhearing E6 yell and curse the following to R1 "Get the [expletive] out of my face". During the investigation, E1 asked E13 about the incident. E13 reported overhearing the yelling and cursing of E6 to R1. Two other caregivers E4 and E15 reported overhearing E6 be unkind to R1 and other residents. E6 was suspended during the investigation. E6's employment was terminated.

8. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged reporting, investigating, and documenting both of the incidents and cooperating with O1 in the Marana Police Department's investigation.

INSP-0076392

Complete
Date: 10/10/2023
Type: Complaint;Compliance (Annual)
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2023-10-19

Summary:

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00198721, AZ00199088, AZ00199411, AZ00199413, AZ00199414, AZ00199651, AZ00200011, and AZ00201696 were conducted on October 10, 2023:

Deficiencies Found: 4

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
B. A manager shall ensure that:
2. A resident is not subjected to:
k. Misappropriation of personal and private property by the assisted living facility's manager, caregivers, assistant caregivers, employees, or volunteers; and
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident was not subjected to misappropriation of personal and private property by the assisted living facility's caregiver for three of seven residents sampled.

Findings:

1. A review of R1's medical record revealed, R1 was receiving personal care services.

2. A review of documentation revealed on July 19, 2023, R1's POA reported to E1 that fraudulent transactions had been made on R1's credit card. E1 notified the Marana Police Department, and The Adult Protective Services on July 19, 2023. The total amount was approximately $500.

3. A review of R7's medical record revealed, R7 was receiving personal care services.

4. A review of documentation revealed on July 19, 2023, R7 reported to E1 that fraudulent transactions had been made on R7's credit card. E1 notified the Marana Police Department, and The Adult Protective Services on July 19, 2023. The total amount was approximately $783.42.

5. A review of R5's medical record revealed, R5 was receiving directed care services.

6. A review of documentation revealed on July 26, 2023, R5 reported to E1 that fraudulent transactions had been made on R5's credit card. E1 notified the Marana Police Department, and The Adult Protective Services on July 26, 2023. The total amount was approximately $687.44.

7. A review of documentation provided by The Marana Police Department revealed, E8 was positively identified by video tapes from the facility, local restaurants, gas stations, and hardware stores. E8 had physically taken R1, R5, and R7's credit cards and was using them for self-purchases.

8. In an interview, E1, and E2 reported E8 had been discharged by the facility on July 10, 2023, for other offenses. E1, and E2 acknowledged E8 had misappropriated personal and private property from R1, R5, and R7.

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
F. In addition to the requirements in R9-10-808(A)(3), a manager shall ensure that the service plan for a resident receiving personal care services includes:
1. Skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections;
2. Offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration;
3. Incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting; and
4. If applicable, the determination in subsection (B)(2)(b)(iii).
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan for a resident receiving personal care services included skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections; offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration; and incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintained the highest practicable level of independence when toileting, for three of three residents sampled receiving personal care services.

Findings include:

1. A review of R1's, medical record revealed documentation of a current written service plan for personal care services dated September 4, 2023, did not contain the following:

- Skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections;
- Offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration; and
- Incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting.

2. A review of R2's medical record revealed documentation of a current written service plan for personal care services dated August 25, 2023, did not contain the following:

- Skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections;
- Offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration; and
- Incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting

3. A review of R3's medical record revealed documentation of a current written service plan for personal care services dated August 25, 2023, did not contain the following:

- Skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections;
- Offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration; and
- Incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting.

4. In an interview, E1, and E2 acknowledged that R1, R2, and R3's service plans did not include documentation of skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections; incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting; and offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration.

Deficiency #3

Rule/Regulation Violated:
C. In addition to the requirements in R9-10-808(A)(3), a manager shall ensure that the service plan for a resident receiving directed care services includes:
1. The requirements in R9-10-814(F)(1) through (3);
2. If applicable, the determination in R9-10-814(B)(2)(b)(iii);
3. Cognitive stimulation and activities to maximize functioning;
4. Strategies to ensure a resident's personal safety;
5. Encouragement to eat meals and snacks;
6. Documentation:
a. Of the resident's weight, or
b. From a medical practitioner stating that weighing the resident is contraindicated; and
7. Coordination of communications with the resident's representative, family members, and, if applicable, other individuals identified in the resident's service plan.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the service plan for a resident receiving directed care services included the requirements in R9-10-815(C)(1-5), for two of three directed care residents sampled.

Findings include:

1. A review of R4's medical record revealed documentation of a service plan dated August 16, 2023, indicating R4 was receiving directed care services. However, the service plans did not contain the following:

- Incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting;
- Cognitive stimulation and activities to maximize functioning;
- Strategies to ensure a resident's personal safety;
- Encouragement to eat meals and snacks; and
- Documentation of the resident's weight, or from a medical practitioner stating that weighing the resident is contraindicated.

2. A review of R6's medical record revealed documentation of a service plan dated July 11, 2023, indicating R6 was receiving directed care services. However, the service plans did not contain the following:

- Incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting;
- Cognitive stimulation and activities to maximize functioning;
- Strategies to ensure a resident's personal safety;
- Encouragement to eat meals and snacks; and
- Documentation of the resident's weight, or from a medical practitioner stating that weighing the resident is contraindicated.

3. In an interview, E1, and E2 acknowledged the service plans did not contain all of the requirements for directed care residents.

Deficiency #4

Rule/Regulation Violated:
D. A manager shall ensure that:
2. A current toxicology reference guide is available for use by personnel members.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a current toxicology reference guide was available for use by personnel members.

Findings include:

1. The Compliance Officer requested the facility's toxicology reference guide. However, a toxicology reference guide was not provided for review.

2. In an interview, E1, and E2 acknowledged the facility's toxicology reference guide or electronic format was not available for review.

INSP-0076390

Complete
Date: 7/24/2023
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2023-08-08

Summary:

An on-site investigation of complaints AZ00193437, AZ00193917, AZ00194972, AZ00193461, AZ00193600, AZ00193459, AZ00196831, AZ00198305, was conducted on July 24, 2023 and the following deficiencies were cited .

Deficiencies Found: 2

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
J. If a manager has a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454 , to believe abuse, neglect or exploitation has occurred on the premises or while a resident is receiving services from an assisted living facility's manager, caregiver, or assistant caregiver, the manager shall:
1. If applicable, take immediate action to stop the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation;
2. Report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454;
3. Document:
a. The suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation;
b. Any action taken according to subsection (J)(1); and
c. The report in subsection (J)(2);
4. Maintain the documentation in subsection (J)(3) for at least 12 months after the date of the report in subsection(J)(2);
5. Initiate an investigation of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation and document the following information within five working days after the report required in subsection (J)(2):
a. The dates, times, and description of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation;
b. A description of any injury to the resident related to the suspected abuse or neglect and any change to the resident's physical, cognitive, functional, or emotional condition;
c. The names of witnesses to the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; and
d. The actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation from occurring in the future; and
6. Maintain a copy of the documented information required in subsection (J)(5) for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. \'a7 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises or while the resident was receiving services, the manager failed to document the suspected abuse, maintain the documentation in subsection (J)(3) for at least 12 months after the date of the report in subsection(J)(2), and include actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse, and maintain a copy of the documentation required in subsection (J)(5) for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated.

Findings include:

1. A review of documentation provided by Adult Protective Services (APS) revealed the following allegations of suspected abuse occurred involving R1, R2, R3, R7, and R8:

2. A review of documentation dated June 10, 2023 from APS revealed O1 had reasonable basis to believe abuse had occurred on the premises while a resident was receiving services from the assisted living facility and report it. O1 reported the following allegations involving R1, and E7. R1 reported E7 had been abrasive, insensitive, and rough when providing care to R1. The managers investigation of these allegations determined E7 was being rough with the resident. A review of the investigation document revealed the following was missing from the investigation document:

-actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse from occurring in the future.

3. A review of documentation provided by APS to the department dated March 31, 2023, revealed allegations of abuse between R2 and E7. The following was missing from the investigation document:

-actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse from occurring in the future.

4. A review of documentation provided by APS to the department dated April 4, 2023, allegations of abuse were reported that someone punched R2. R2 had a cut on the top of R2's hand and some bruises. A review of documentation provided by E1 revealed APS did an investigation on April 5, 2023, on these allegations. The following was missing from the investigation document:

- no documentation was provided to show an investigation of these allegation had taken place.

5. A review of documentation provided by APS to the department dated March 29, 2023, revealed allegations of abuse took place between R3 and E7. The following was missing from the investigation document:

-actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse from occurring in the future.

6. A review of documentation provided by APS to the department dated March 31, 2023, revealed allegations of abuse between R3 and E7. The following was missing from the investigation document:

- no documentation was provided to show an investigation of these allegation had taken place.

7. A review of documentation provided by APS to the department dated February 8, 2023, allegations of abuse, and neglect was reported. R7 had been left in the bathroom by a caregiver. R7 suffered a laceration on forehead and possible broken ribs. The following was missing from the investigation document:

- no documentation was provided to show an investigation of these allegation had taken place.

8. A review of documentation provided by APS to the department dated March 19, 2023, allegations of abuse were reported. R8 had bruises on body and arms. The following was missing from the investigation document:

- no documentation was provided to show an investigation of these allegation had taken place.

9. In an interview, E1 reported unable to locate investigation reports from APS investigations for R2, R3, R7, and R8, and acknowledged reports for R1, R2, and R3 were missing actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse from occurring in the future.

This is a repeat citation from the complaint survey conducted on March 27, 2023.

Deficiency #2

Rule/Regulation Violated:
D. When a resident has an accident, emergency, or injury that results in the resident needing medical services, a manager shall ensure that a caregiver or an assistant caregiver:
2. Documents the following:
a. The date and time of the accident, emergency, or injury;
b. A description of the accident, emergency, or injury;
c. The names of individuals who observed the accident, emergency, or injury;
d. The actions taken by the caregiver or assistant caregiver;
e. The individuals notified by the caregiver or assistant caregiver; and
f. Any action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident has an accident, emergency, or injury that results in the resident needing medical services, a manager shall ensure that a caregiver or an assistant caregiver documents the date and time of the accident, emergency, or injury, a description of the accident, emergency, or injury, the names of individuals who observed the accident, emergency, or injury, actions taken by the caregiver or assistant caregiver, the individuals notified by the caregiver or assistant caregiver, and any action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk.

Findings include:

1. A review of documentation provided by E1 revealed an incident report for R2 who received medical services for a cut on top of the hand and some bruises from a fall. The document is missing the following:

- any action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future.

2. A review of documentation provided by Adult Protective Services (APS) revealed R7 received medical services for a laceration on forehead and possible broken ribs. The document is missing the following:

- no documentation available to review on this incident resulting in an injury to a resident.

3. A review of documentation provided by Adult Protective Services (APS) revealed R8 received medical services for bruises on the body and arms. The document is missing the following:

- no documentation available to review on this incident resulting in an injury to a resident.

4. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the residents received medical services. R2's document was missing any action taken to prevent the accident, emergency, or injury from occurring in the future, and no documentation was provided for review on the incidents involving R7, and R8.

INSP-0076388

Complete
Date: 3/27/2023
Type: Complaint
Worksheet: Assisted Living Center
SOD Sent: 2023-04-10

Summary:

An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00190954 was conducted on March 28, 2023, and the following deficiencies were cited:

Deficiencies Found: 1

Deficiency #1

Rule/Regulation Violated:
J. If a manager has a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. § 46-454 , to believe abuse, neglect or exploitation has occurred on the premises or while a resident is receiving services from an assisted living facility's manager, caregiver, or assistant caregiver, the manager shall:
1. If applicable, take immediate action to stop the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation;
2. Report the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of the resident according to A.R.S. § 46-454;
3. Document:
a. The suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation;
b. Any action taken according to subsection (J)(1); and
c. The report in subsection (J)(2);
4. Maintain the documentation in subsection (J)(3) for at least 12 months after the date of the report in subsection(J)(2);
5. Initiate an investigation of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation and document the following information within five working days after the report required in subsection (J)(2):
a. The dates, times, and description of the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation;
b. A description of any injury to the resident related to the suspected abuse or neglect and any change to the resident's physical, cognitive, functional, or emotional condition;
c. The names of witnesses to the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation; and
d. The actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation from occurring in the future; and
6. Maintain a copy of the documented information required in subsection (J)(5) for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated.
Evidence/Findings:
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, after the manager had a reasonable basis, according to A.R.S. \'a7 46-454, to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation had occurred on the premises, the manager failed to document the suspected abuse, maintain the documentation in subsection (J)(3) for at least 12 months after the date of the report in subsection(J)(2), and include the dates, times, and description of the suspected abuse, a description of any injury to the resident related to the suspected abuse, and any change to the resident's physical, cognitive, functional, or emotional condition, the names of witnesses to the suspected abuse, and actions taken by the manager to prevent the suspected abuse, and maintain a copy of the documentation required in subsection (J)(5) for at least 12 months after the date the investigation was initiated.

Findings include:

1. A review of documentation provided by The Adult Protective Services (APS) revealed an incident occurred involving R1, R2, and R3. The allegation was suspected abuse by E2. This document was sent to the Department on February 1, 2023.

2. A review of R1, R2, and R3's medical records revealed all residents were receiving directed care services.

3. In an interview, E1 reported APS, and the The Tucson Police Department came to the facility and did an investigation on this incident.

4. A review of two documents provided by E1 revealed a document titled "Incident Form" dated January 18, 2023, this document was an incident investigation report involving R1 and E2. This document had all the requirements in R9-10-803.J. A review of the second documented titled "Incident Form" dated January 26, 2023, revealed an incident investigation report involving R2 and E2. This document had all the requirements in R9-10-803.J.

5. The Compliance Officer asked E1 for the incident report for the investigation of R3 and E2. E1 reported doing an investigation however, did not do a incident report. No documentation was provided to show an investigation was completed on the incident involving R3 and E2, as required in R9-10-03.J.

6. In an interview, E1 acknowledged an investigation report was not completed for R3 as required in R9-10-803.J.