Evidence/Findings:
<p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;">Based on record review and interview, the Governing Authority failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411 by failing to make documented good faith efforts to contact previous employers to obtain information or recommendations which may be relevant to a person's fitness to work in a residential care institution. </span><span style="color: black; font-size: 10pt;">The deficient practice posed a risk if E4, E5, or E6 were a danger to a vulnerable population.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><strong style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </strong></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;">Findings include:</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13.3333px;">1. A review of E4’s, E5’s, and E6’s personnel records revealed each caregiver had a valid fingerprint clearance card on each employee's respective date of hire.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;">2. A review of E4’s personnel record revealed an employment application dated September 6, 2024. The application included a section for documenting prior work history, which included the names of three prior employers, and respective dates of employment. The application contained a section for documenting contact with “Work or Professional References,” however, the section was completely blank. Further review of E4’s personnel record revealed evidence of documentation of good faith efforts to contact E4’s previous employers was unavailable for review.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;">3. A review of E5’s personnel record revealed an employment application dated February 10, 2025. The application included a section for documenting prior work history, which included the names of three prior employers, and respective dates of employment. The application contained a section for documenting contact with “Work or Professional References.” The section included names of individuals contacted, their opinions of the applicant, and dates of contact. However, the documentation of the individual’s relationship with the applicant, such as a previous manager, supervisor, or other indication they were a previous employer, was unavailable for review. Further review of E5’s personnel record revealed evidence of documentation of good faith efforts to contact E5’s previous employers was unavailable for review.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;">4. A review of E6’s personnel record revealed an employment application dated January 31, 2024. The application included a section for documenting prior work history, which was not completed. The application contained a section for documenting contact with “Work or Professional References,” which was also blank. E6’s personnel record did contain a resume which included names of previous employers and respective dates of employment. However, further review of E6’s personnel record revealed evidence of documentation of good faith efforts to contact E6’s previous employers was unavailable for review.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt;">5. In an interview, E1 advised efforts were made to contact E4’s and E6’s previous employers, but those efforts had not been documented. E1 agreed E4’s, E5’s, and E6’s employment records did not include documented good faith efforts to contact previous employers as required in </span><span style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-size: 10pt; background-color: white;">A.R.S. § 36-411.</span></p>
Summary:
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints 00105710 and 00105171 conducted on April 1, 2025: